Crevasses in the Classroom

Steve Sailer writes: From my new column in Taki’s Magazine about a huge new database of school achievement test scores that answers the old question: Is there any single place in America where blacks (0r Hispanics) outscore whites on cognitive tests?

Crevasses in the Classroom
by Steve Sailer
May 04, 2016

Where are racial gaps in school test scores worst? Ironically, where liberals are most dominant.

The new national database of school-district test scores created by education researchers at Stanford and Harvard reveals that the single widest white-black racial gap in American public school districts is in the city most synonymous with leftism since 1964: Berkeley, California.

How badly do blacks lag whites in Berkeley public schools? Berkeley’s white-black gap is 1.60 standard deviations. In other words, the median black student would score at only the 5th percentile if he were white.

Yet, Berkeley is ferociously antiracist. It was the first to have a Black Studies Department at the high school level. In the 2012 election, Berkeley voted for Obama over Romney 90 to 5. Berkeley Unified school-district administrators obsess over any data showing that black students get punished more than other races.

Still, the racial gap is bigger in Berkeley than anywhere else. …

The worst white-black gaps tend to be found in old-money liberal towns like Berkeley, Chapel Hill, Shaker Heights, Asheville, and Evanston (the five worst examples of racial inequality in America according to the new Stanford test score database) that can afford a lot of liberal white guilt, which attracts black welfare moms.

Read the whole thing there.

The examples where NAMs score above or just below whites are pretty funny.

I also point out the school district where blacks and Hispanics score highest in all of America, which is pretty ironic.

I love writing these kind of articles where I take an academic’s database, re-sort it, and point out what’s really going on.

COMMENTS:

* In the dark days of the 19th century, when women and minorities were hunted for sport and everybody was wrong about everything, a situation being exactly the same all over the world would have led to scientific conclusions.

* OT, but today’s print UK Guardian features an 8-page souvenir pullout on 5,000-1 outsiders Leicester City winning the English Premier League (footy/soccer).

* In order to make sense of the gaps, you have to look at race AND social class. So in a place where you have high class whites and low class minorities you are going to have a large gap, in a place where you have low class whites and low class minorities you’ll have a smaller gap. In a new city like Frisco where everyone is more or less middle class, the gap will be somewhere in between.

The reason that Berkeley does even worse with black students than a place like Philadelphia is that they are trying to teach blacks in unstructured white liberal learning style. This doesn’t even work that well for whites, but for blacks it is disastrous. I’m sure that they also put the blacks in the same classes as whites out of anti-racism so the black students are unable to keep up with the pace and fall hopelessly behind.

Once they get to the high school level and the hormones kick in, Philadelphia schools are pretty rough places, but at the elementary school level they have made some progress by imposing structure on the kids, especially in the “charter schools”. Most of the public schools require uniforms and they break the material down to a level that blacks can hope to understand, etc. The elementary schools at least are surprisingly orderly places. They are never going to turn out rocket scientists because of the raw material that they have to work with, but they do teach a certain basic level of literacy.

What were the odds against President Trump 2016 at the start of the campaign? I’m looking forward to the Guardian’s souvenir pullout already.

* So you want to take issue with the hate fact promulgated by the Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, whose chart Steve has published in the past, showing that blacks students from families with yearly incomes over $200K have LOWER test scores than white kids with family incomes under $40K?

* “A practice of Gypsy hunting was quite common—a game very similar to fox hunting. Even as late as 1835, there was a Gypsy hunt in Jutland (Denmark) that brought in a bag of over 260 men, women and children.”

—Gypsies of the White Mountains: History of a Nomadic Culture

* I think a lot of educators instinctively know this even if it is never vocalized – hence the hatred of No Child Left Behind and the goal of getting minority students to perform the same on standardized tests as white kids. They knew this would be an impossible goal to realize and that teachers are a convenient scapegoat for underperforming kids, rather than their parents or communities.

I seem to recall a few years back DC proposed abandoning equalizing white and black test scores and just focus on how much of a percentage increase black students could achieve over past benchmarks. It was accompanied with the usual comments about privilege, private tutors, and so on (I honestly don’t know any parents who use private tutors), but it was a surprisingly realistic perspective about what is possible.

* A lot of BHS alums in my family. The first issue is that Berkeley is naturally going to be the public school district for all of the faculty (and grad students and post docs with children) at UC Berkeley (Cal), which is right up the street. It’s also home to a large number of intellectual-High IQ types who work in San Francisco, or wherever (Michael Chabon, doctors, lawyers, CEO’s, CFO’s, etc.) These people are vastly white.

On the other hand, there are neighborhoods to the west near the bay and south leading into Oakland and this is where the black students come from. The area to the West is where there was a Portuguese community (Billy Martin grew up there), but that was supplanted by Latinos and Blacks a long time ago, and the main N-S drag in that part of town, San Pablo, was where the hookers and pimps hung out, catching all the traffic from Richmond down to Oakland (IIRC, the blaxploitation movie, “The Mack” was largely shot there.)

The neighborhoods to the south that bleed into Oakland — remember, there is no barrier or anything, it’s just that at some point in the grid you are no longer in Berkeley, you are in Oakland — used to be a location for a lot of poor blacks also. (The word I get from the West Coast now is that there’s a lot of gentrification all over).

Since the pre-HS schools are mostly locally fed, there probably isn’t a lot of integration in the schools at that level, as a matter of fact. There isn’t such a tradition at the HS, either. Basically what used to happen is that blacks and whites were put on separate academic tracks, so they rarely took the same classes, unless someone went out of their way to cross over. Friends who taught there within the past 20 years or so indicate that this bifurcation simply got more pronounced, Disraeli’s “two nations” comes to mind.

* Honest teachers from diverse districts will tell you Steve is, of course, correct in his interpretation of this data. They endure all the crap programs and unfair evaluations thrown at them in the expectation that natural gaps can be closed. They also have to put up with “vibrant” discipline problems without much backup from politically correct (and often corrupt) administrations. Can’t have “disparate impact” on expulsion numbers, you know.

I have another, related subject:

Even in homogenous white school districts, there is another crevasse teachers are expected to cross: that between “special needs” kids and the rest of the class. Affluent districts, like the one where I live, throw more money every year at the ludicrous idea of “inclusion,” and we pay for it with our outrageous, ever-increasing, property taxes.

The insane idea that everyone is an equivalent blank slate is costing us billions of dollars and robbing students of the opportunity to learn at their own, appropriate levels. It’s also driving good teachers nuts!

It’s all the same, half-century-old, left-wing bullshit — and it’s killing us.

* Berkeley, Chapel Hill, Shaker Heights, Asheville, and Evanston are all university towns: so what that will mean is that the (mostly non-black) universities will strongly bias against the black population.

Why that isn’t an issue in Cambridge, Mass., New Haven, CT, etc. I do not know, probably a zoning issue. I know that most of the Ivy League colleges are sequestered from large minority populations simply by where they are. (Not U Penn, though: but Philly, like New York, is huge.)

O/T but can’t resist: How can any Republican actively support Hillary for president? Impossible, I think. The fact that the National Review is asking for donations because Trump “hates them” just shows that NR is now fully functional irrelevant.

* I love the various school test scores databases. As I explain to liberals, school teachers are not only racist, they are active participants in the largest secret racist conspiracy in the USA.

In the 16000 school systems in America, not a single one–NOT ONE–shows black test scores greater than white test scores. Since “all men are created equal”, the odds of this happening by chance are infinitesimally small.

It must be intentional and it must be coordinated. There is no other explanation.

And then I tell them I will give them $100 if they can find one single school district where blacks score higher than whites.

[There is one city. As best I remember, in a 20+city study of urban schools conducted 10-20 years ago, Detroit black boys scored higher than Detroit white boys.]

* The “average white person” in this country has an IQ of 100. The average black person in this country has a IQ of 85. That’s a hell of a difference. No one has said the average black or white is a “total idiot” or that the average black or white is “dumb.”

What has been said and what IS true is that the mean (or average) in cognitive abilities between population groups differ–that, therefore, there IS a gap one can expect to see in achievement in schools and that we’ve spent time, money, and talent trying to do the impossible, make the damn gap go away so that good little anti-science “Progressives” (god, what a name), can feel better about everybody being the same, or they say, “equal.”

Yeah, as you suggested, “average” ain’t all that bright,but a hell of a lot of average folks have been productive citizens and taxpayers throughout our history. You must also understand that some averages are MUCH higher than others. In other words, averages aren’t “equal.”

Schools would be better if we understood we can achieve some things with “average” and “below average”; we could start by understanding that the more “average” and “below average” kids are, the more structure they need, not less, as stupid anti-science sorts would have you believe.

* The national average racial gap between whites vs. blacks & Hispanics is 2 grade levels, to give you a sense of scale.

http://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/achievement-gap/

So if you figure that the school age population is around 1/2 white, 1/2 other, that means that the average white kid would be around 1 grade level above the average of all races. So the white kids in Berkeley are ANOTHER 1.7 grade levels ahead of the average white kid. If you figure that the average white kid in Berkeley is the child of a professor or other educated professional, this is not impossible. Figure that these kids are either actual Ashkenazi Jews or about as smart as average Ashkenazi Jews – they are a group that is roughly as far ahead of whites in intelligence as whites are of blacks. Because Jews are such a small segment of the population, 3 out of 4 smart people will still be non-Jewish on average.

* I don’t think liberal old money towns have been all that welcoming of poor blacks in the last 30 years or so, but they’re stuck with the descendants of the ones their grandparents welcomed in more optimistic times.

* I seriously doubt if Mexico will ever annex its former territories, because if it did, it would be in as bad shape as the rest of Mexico within a couple of decades. I don’t think the Mexicans want that, and I don’t think the illegal immigrant Mexicans want that, either.

Remember, these Mexicans are not coming to the US in order to squat for reconquista. They are coming here because they can make actual money here, have a decent life here, get social benefits that actually function properly, have an environment where they are physically much safer, and have a better future. It’s like a black couple moving out of the ghetto into a white suburb: they aren’t doing this to be the expeditionary force for some colony ghetto, they are moving there to get away from the ghetto.

* Having been a public school teacher in both Detroit and Richmond CA (just up the road from Berkeley), and currently a teacher in truly one of the nation’s most diverse districts anywhere, I count myself as an absolute authority on all things public schooley:

Chaldean-Americans (Middle-Eastern Iraqi Christians with an incredible amount of ethnocentric tribalism and Old-World conspiracy-mongering thrown in) make up a huge part of the “whites” of Detroit, Sterling Heights and West Bloomfield.

Hard-working at the store or business (open late, much to the academic detriment of the teenage sons who are expected to close the cell-phone store or the liquor store), the Chaldean community is the future of America, I think. Not terribly interested in the kind of effort for real academic achievement, but certainly interested in learning enough to get by.

The girls are usually quite attractive and generally sociable. Many cultures do much worse in protecting their young women from unwanted attention. Chaldean girls do not suffer any unwanted pregnancies. No way. It does not happen, and that is refreshing, given the crude sexual advances that many young black men make toward the black girls.

Most of the boys are quite confident and happy to be in America. If we are looking for a “model” minority, we could do a lot worse than Chaldean-Americans. If they are the future, and maybe they are, then things will be OK.

Not great, just OK.

But, with 4 billion Africans looming on the horizon of the next generation, well, maybe “OK” will have to do.

* And the systemic test cheating in Atlanta has been flushed down the memory hole.

Posted in Blacks, Education | Comments Off on Crevasses in the Classroom

John Rivers: Coulter calls it for Trump on June 19, 2015 and gets laughed out of the room. Who’s laughing now?

Steve Sailer: Screenshot 2016-05-03 20.42.48

From the Daily Caller:

The Man Behind The Hilarious Conservative Pundit Parody Account Speaks Out

Interviewed by Scott Greer

You can follow Conservative Pundit at https://twitter.com/DemsRRealRacist

Screenshot 2016-05-03 20.48.40

COMMENTS:

* This dude is wicked shmart…each tweet is a like precious gem lovingly crafted.

* I’ve been following him for a while. There’s no one as consistently funny as him working in any medium right now. I assumed he writes comedy for a living, but the interview doesn’t give much biographical background beyond “southern evangelical.” So who knows?

* He posts elsewhere as a different name, won’t do anything to identify him but I’ll just say he’s probably an occasional iSteve reader.

* He’s like a more ruthless Mark Steyn.

As Jacques Barzun wrote in his magisterial survey of Western culture (who is fastidious and wannabe high-brow now?) “a decadent culture offers opportunities chiefly to the satirist” and nobody has grabbed those opportunities by the balls quite like CP.

* Greg Gutfeld admitted on The Five that he will not vote for Donald Trump in November.

Which is not surprising because Greg Gutfeld is from San Mateo, California and last time I checked not a lot of real Conservatives come out of San Mateo.

* I used to like Greg Gutfeld but Trump really outed him as a cuck. Gutfeld said he first turned against Trump when Trump said he didn’t consider John McCain a war hero. Apparently this commonsensical observation is appalling to cucks.

I have never been able to stand McCain and when Trump said what he did I thought, “This is a guy I could vote for without holding my nose.”

* Here’s CP’s original pic before WF Buckley. He used one of this guy on the far right:

I like CP’s comment on National Review – “ornate…geriatric…and dying”. LOL.

Genius:

On National Review:

* This was in Daily Caller, and it does say that Tucker Carlson follows DRRR.

I wonder if Tucker Carlson is swallowing the red pill and making his way to Alt-Right.

* Tucker Carlson is the best of all the regular pundits on Fox News. I believe he gets it, but he also gets what he can’t say if he wants to keep his job, which leads to some unfortunate situations, e.g., removing Mickey Kaus from the Daily Caller.

MORE COMMENTS:

* And the audience laughs uproariously, as if she has just suggested that Bozo the Clown will be the nominee, or maybe some B-actor known for making movies with chimps. And the other panelists make faces. He who laughs last laughs best.

* She was clearly the smartest person at the table. And the kicker? The latino says, “Take off the I hate you sign”. While literally Mexicans have been holding up the Mexican flags and screaming fuck you at Americans for forever now starting riots and assaulting the people paying for their Medicare and Welfare checks.

The cuck tried to ask what she wanted to do with all the illegals. The answer is clearly deport. Make it hard, make it swift, make it ugly and they will self deport. Don’t break up families send junior packing with mom and dad.

* Donald Trump needs to win over voters who are obsessed with celebrities and want to see them in positions of power. I am talking about voters who are star struck by the likes of Jesse The Body Ventura & Arnold Schwarzenegger and would have no problem voting for them.

* Wow!
Coulter not only nailed DJT but the Bern too!
Amazingly uncannily uniquely prescient!
She really has her fingers on the radial artery of America like no other.
Except maybe DJT and Bernie themselves.
You can visualize her being correct about the general as well.

* Black politics turned into a culture of complaint. Even white Libs got sick of it even as they kept mum. So, Clinton came up with New Democrats. And people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton were loathed even by white Libs. White Libs kept up the alliance but never would have supported such people.

Obama’s winning touch in 2008 was he wasn’t part of this Culture of Complaint. Or he kept it under wraps with his bogus charm and smiles. He seemed like a clean-cut Negro who wanted to have a conversation than complain and bitch incessantly.

I think after 8 yrs, people have wised up to the fact that he is just a weasel punk.
In a way, Obama didn’t have to complain much since he could coast on the media promoting him, big money being behind him, and the 2008 financial crisis that, on top of Iraq fiasco, dealt the GOP a bad hand.
No political candidate had it so easy as Obama as in 2008. Crisis, money, media, academia, pop culture, cult of hope, and the world(that was sick of Bush II and uneasy about insane McCain) all on his side.

Anyway, Trump’s appeal is different. He is a white guy who complains. Sometimes, he complains loudly, even lewdly. His is a white culture of complaint.

For the longest time, white guys didn’t complain. It was part of Anglo legacy. It seemed improper or gauche for a white man to complain and bitch. In 1992, the media were totally biased against Bush I, but Bush never complained about the media. It just wasn’t his style. It was beneath him to complain and be seen as a sourpuss.
It was the Anglo-American style of being aloof of petty stuff and maintaining decorum. Nixon was hated because he tended to sometimes complain, mostly famously with ‘you won’t have a nixon to kick around anymore.’.

For the longest time, there was no reason for privileged white males to complain. They had just about everything. Their kind had controlled and dominated US history from the beginning. Both the ‘right’ and ‘left’ were all white males.
They were on the dollar bills. They controlled the military and media and banks and academia and so much more.
They could afford to be dignified, mannered, and magnanimous since they held all the cards of power.

But over the yrs, this outlook and stance got thinner and thinner. It was less andless backed by real power, real influence, real reach, real respect.
The elite institutions increasingly came to be taken over by the GLOB.
MLK and even Tubman came to tower over white males as the real moral founders of America.
The Immigrant Narrative eclipsed the Settler Narrative.
White Bashing, esp white male bashing, became a national sport in media and academia.
White males lost in sports and music. Some even debased themselves via cuck culture.

When white males held all the power, prestige, and privilege, they could be above the culture of complaint. Let those with less fortunes in life complain since they had reasons to. As for whites who dominated much of everything, their role was to lead and inspire, not complain.

But white males no longer have prestige. Some have power and privilege but only condition that they work against the identity and interests of their own race.

So, white dignity and magnanimity are now just a hollow charade.
There are REAL BIG problems confronting the white community. It is now time for white complaint.
And Trump tapped into this.

You can’t act high-born and aloof
when your ass is for the GLOB to boof.

If you’re the bitch, you better bitch.

* Notice that everything Paul Manafort predicted came true. All of it.

It seems that Manafort understood the role of momentum in these contests.

Other seasoned observers missed the importance of momentum in a primary. Cruz ran out of friendly states with large hauls of delegates. There was no way he could build momentum through June.

* Trump has been consistently a pro-law and order guy, and he’s gotten endorsements from police unions and the border patrol, and if he has a consistent philosophy, it’s nationalism.

* If Trump is elected, I have little doubt he will build a wall along our southern border. He knows how to build stuff. It will help him get re-elected. It will be much more difficult to get trade deals reworked. It will be easier to accomplish his foreign policy objectives, getting Europe to pay more for NATO, getting Japan to pay more for our defense force. Even banning muslims will be easier than getting NAFTA altered, but he can use the corporate tax code to encourage more firms to invest in the US, by reducing the corporate tax rate for firms that invest in America. Apple alone has $200 billion in foreign bank accounts, they cannot bring this cash back to the US now, but more favorable tax rates would encourage these global firms to bring back the capital and re-invest in America.

* Donald Trump will eventually go down as one of the top 5 most famous Americans of all time. He is well known among Americans from The Greatest Generation, The Silent Generation, Baby Boomers, Generation X, Millennials, and Generation Z.

Even a Hillbilly Hermit living in a rural shack in the middle of nowhere similar to the one Jason Voorhees lived in Friday The 13th, knows who Donald Trump is. Probably the only Americans who have never heard of Donald Trump are the Amish.

* I think it’s okay to call a homosexual a faggot if you put a robust superlative in front of the word faggot, as in “Milo Yiannopoulus is a magnificent faggot.” The rules may be different with lesbians – they aren’t so big on superlatives.

* I do remember when I saw that video 9 months ago or so, I gasped when Ann Coulter answered “Trump” as her pick for the most likely to win. (Did she really say that?…) Saying that looked crazy, provocative, funny (and the crowd certainly laughed), but mostly brave and original. And it made me think. Turns out she was right (though she won’t be fully vindicated unless Trump is elected, of course).

I’ve come to respect Ann Coulter as a brave and original woman, a dissident, to use John Derbyshire’s term. How she manages to buck trends and be laughed at and dismissed and vituperated, day in, day out, I’ll never know. Respect.

* And look what happened to ¡Jeb’s $75 guacamole bowls. What did happen to ¡Jeb’s $75 guacamole bowls? Consigned to the dustbin of cracked pottery?

* Obama is clever. Generally, he gets other blacks to do his complaining for him so he can remain above the fray. Eric Holder and now Loretta Lynch do it for him. When he slips and does the complaining himself he ends up with egg on his face, as in the the Skippy Gates, Trayvon Martin, and Michael Brown cases.

* Certainly immigration was the issue which gave cuckservatives their name, but cuckservativism is a recognizable package of beliefs of which open borders is only one. If you want to know what they are, DemsRRealRacist parodies them with pitch perfect fidelity. The underlying theme is that the natural role of Republicans in America is to be the predesignated losers – Democrats are the Harlem Globetrotters and Republicans are the Washington Generals. Democrats are on the right side of history but sometimes take the train down the tracks a little too fast. The Republicans’ job is not to stop the train of inevitable social progress or God forbid throw it into reverse, but just to lightly tap on the brakes now and then or just to yell out ineffectually, slow down Barack, you’re driving too fast! McCain is their poster boy so naturally a cuck would take offense at someone attacking his war record.

* I think Gutfeld’s schtick is to accept the premises of the Left and then show how he and his exceedingly small band of twenty-somethings to forty-somethings are really the ones who embrace the Left’s libertine ethos. It’s silly, not the least because it just hasn’t really worked.

The cuckservative moniker really boils down to the feeling that conservative opinion-makers and thought leaders are captives of the Left who offer token resistance to the Left but then quickly fold in battle – allowing the Left the appearance of a victory and the ability to quickly consolidate its gains as the “right” in the persons of cuckservatives adopt the radical new change as the new status quo. For example, the cuckservative conventional wisdom postmortem on gay marriage is now that the Right didn’t retreat and surrender earlier, when it could have been bold and gained mainstream respectability (which is doled out by the Left’s media allies and functions like Lucy’s football). Some cuckservatives are actually proposing that gay cakes and tranny bathrooms in kindergartens are only on the menu because the right pissed of the alphabet people by not showing obeisance earlier and making them wait for the Court to impose clown world marriage. They’re the ones clinging to the “Constitution” as if the Left has ever been limited in its objectives by it in the last forty years – the Left has a “living Constitution” that bears as its fruits nearly every one of its democratically unpopular wishlist items and the cuckservative has “original intent” and a menu of canons like stare decisis which serve to make the Left’s extraconstitutional meddling permanent and preclude the right from responding in kind.

The cuckservative sees his role as a well-paid member of the Washington Generals.

* It’s pretty clear that Carlson has been reading paleocon stuff since the Iraq
War went wrong. I haven’t followed his career closely but based on what I’ve casually observed he’s been mostly a conventional conservative since then who occasionally engages in real talk, but not often enough to get himself and his career into serious trouble. After the Chattanooga killings he said the US needed to review Muslim immigration – Link – which I think made him the first mainstream talking head/journalist or whatever he is, to suggest such a thing.

Posted in Ann Coulter | Comments Off on John Rivers: Coulter calls it for Trump on June 19, 2015 and gets laughed out of the room. Who’s laughing now?

Facebook Controlling The Narrative

During the first week, perhaps the first day, Facebook introduced this, I noticed it pushing this anti Ann Coulter story, saying somebody made her look stupid. The perspective was completely biased. I knew then that Facebook would push a left-wing agenda in its news selections.

Comment: It’s just as one might have suspected… what Controlling the Narrative looks like in a post-newspaper age.

“They would regularly avoid sites like World Star Hip Hop, The Blaze, and Breitbart, but were never explicitly told to suppress those outlets.”

News curators also have the power to “deactivate” (or blacklist) a trending topic—a power that those we spoke to exercised on a daily basis. A topic was often blacklisted if it didn’t have at least three traditional news sources covering it, but otherwise the protocol was murky—meaning a curator could ostensibly blacklist a topic without a particularly good reason for doing so. (Those we interviewed said they didn’t see any signs that blacklisting was being abused or used inappropriately.)

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on Facebook Controlling The Narrative

Steve Sailer: But, But … I Kept Reading That the Merkel Youth Were a Financial Windfall?

From Marginal Revolution:

European countries that refuse to share the burden of high immigration will face a financial charge of about €250,000 per refugee, according to Brussels’ plans to overhaul the bloc’s asylum rules. [From the Financial Times:]

The punitive financial pay-off clause is one of the most contentious parts of the European Commission’s proposed revision of the so-called Dublin asylum regulation, due to be revealed on Wednesday …

According to four people familiar with the proposal, this contribution was set at €250,000 per asylum seeker in Monday’s commission draft.

Posted in Europe | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: But, But … I Kept Reading That the Merkel Youth Were a Financial Windfall?

Trump Wins Indiana

Comments:

* I predict Trump wins Indiana by more than the 10 point margin that the latest polls have predicted. Cruz needs smiling lessons. His face seems fixed in a pouting sneer with his angry little lips permanently stuck out. Of course that is a shallow description but you cannot win a presidential election with a face like that. Image trumps substance and frankly the Cruz image is terrible, the american public doesn’t want to look at it anymore.

* Donald Trump is trying to win the Alex Jones fanbase vote by claiming Ted Cruz’s father had something to do with the assassination of JFK.

Poor Ted Cruz, before this he was falsely accused by the Left Wing Negro Larry Wilmore of being The Zodiac Killer.

Why do Ted Cruz haters always try to lump him and his family with famous American killers?

* Shillary vs Trump debates will be all time record breaking TV ratings. They’ll make the Super Bowl ratings look like the Food Network at 3 AM.

* London gets its first Muslim mayor tomorrow. To win, the Left has to be wildly anti-Jewish. Will influential Jews kindly note this and stop making supremely fatuous comments about antiseminism being a long-standing problem among the indigeous Brits, who for some inexplicable reason, voted in a |Jewish PM in 1874? I read the comments at the bottom on a Boston Globe article. PCers really cannot think the abvious without having their heads explode.

Their presence in huge numbers also largely (not wholly) accounts for the petition to ban Trump from entering the UK.

* “Donald Trump is trying to win the Alex Jones fanbase.”

He’s had the Alex Jones fanbase in the bag for a long time.

He did 30 minutes with Jones back in december. Former Campaign advisor Roger Stone is also a regular guest of late.

The conspiracy crowd is perpetually yearning for some kind of outsider force to take power in the US (or anywhere, really). In 2012, for instance the number one candidate on the right wing fringes (/pol/, abovetopsecret.com, stormfront, etc.) was Ron Paul.

Trump doesn’t really fit the mold: they tend to hold extreme libertarian views. But Trump has this amazing quality that allows people to project their most extreme fantasies onto him and really commit to them. You can see this on the left, and among the cuckservatives, too, where it is common to read that trump will be the death blow to the democratic republic and usher in an age of tyranny.

The difference between the two views of trump is that the rightwing fringes believe that we already live in an age of oligarchic tyranny.

* The problem is not that they are anti-semitic, although that is a bit of an issue, rather that they are anti-Western-Civilisation. Since the vast majority of us are committed to living lives fully in Western Civilisation, we might want to pay attention to that.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Trump Wins Indiana

Ellen Pao’s Diversity Crusade

Comments:

* Still no pictures of Pao and her gay black diversity litigant scam artist husband Buddy Fletcher.

* I think the phrase “failing upward” is appropriate here. She’s got the gender and ethnic thing working for her, I guess all that is lacking is actual talent…yet she keeps getting hired for jobs that put her in an income bracket 99% of the country will never experience.

* Why is the diversity limited to ethnicity and race? What about height and weight? What about unattractive people, who often get the shaft? What about bald men? What about women who smell? What about people with bad teeth? The list is endless.

If we’re going to police companies, we should police everything about them, not just one element.

* I think Theranos might have an opening soon. I wouldn’t put it past that cracker jack board to extend an offer to her to replace Elizabeth Holmes.

* PAO! Take that, you cretins! The Asian Vagina strikes again – Ha-Ha!

* The current workforce shares of Hindus and LGBBQ can’t go down because that’d be racism and lgbtphobia. The diversicrats might try going after the workforce share of Asians, at first, but the Asians will quickly learn to protect their “minority” turf. The diversicrats are often very stupid and can’t tell who is jewish, so they will target a few Jews here and there, viewing them as mere “fcking white males”. They will quickly learn that Jews are protected too and they will learn to identify them.

There is thus one kind of silicon valley employee that the diversicrats will be able to go after with very few repercussions : the actual white cisgender male. He’s the one who will be pushed aside to make room for the black and latino same-gender-lovin non-binaries. The white cis male working in silicon valley is often enough of a cuck to gladly go along with this plan.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on Ellen Pao’s Diversity Crusade

Will London Elect A Muslim Mayor?

Steve Sailer writes: There are two nuclear armed Western European powers: the UK and France. Both have growing numbers of Muslim voters. Houellebecq’s Submission sketches out one path by which a Muslim politician might luck into getting his finger on a nuclear button in Europe.

American Jews really ought to start thinking about whether immigration schmaltz and refugee worship might someday in the distant future put Israel at odds with a Muslim-led Western European nuclear power?

But that doesn’t seem to have yet dawned upon organized Jewish interests in America. For example, the Anti-Defamation League is currently pushing its We Were Strangers Too campaign to browbeat the West into taking in more Muslim refugees.

But is it good for the Jews?

COMMENTS:

* This guy called moderate Muslims “Uncle Toms.”

He supports homosexual “marriage,” so it looks like the only part of his tradition he’s hanging on to is the Jew hatred. It should be very interesting to see where all this leads.

* Zac Goldsmith is a lousy candidate. A rich aristocratic socialite trying to appeal to proles and Hindus and Tamils was doomed from the start. People criticize the GOP for being tone-deaf but they ain’t got nothing on the Tories.

* What’s the problem with a muslim mayor!. He supports gay marriage. He has all the right labor opinions. We’ve had Jewish mayors in christian cities for almost a century. Apart from white nationalism or overt religious prejudice (of the Steve Emerson or daniel pipes type), is there a good reason to oppose Muslim politicians in Europe or north America?

* Jews get along better with Muslins (for example-Moorish Spain) than they do Christians, who have been their historical persecutors.

Hopefully, London will elect a Muslim mayor. It would be a start to ending the unfair privileges enjoyed by heterosexual white males in the city.

* “What’s the problem with a muslim mayor!”

Can a Jew, Christian, or Atheist be elected mayor of a city in Iran, Egypt, Yemen, or Saudi Arabia for example?

* I saw a video today about 5 famous refugees – Einstein, Albright, Brin & Freud. I can’t remember the other one but I’m certain they were also Jewish. Somehow the example of these refugees was given as proof as to why Europe should take in more refugees.

Zac has run a bad campaign (and I say this as a Zac) as Boris-lite. Ironically Zac G’s two nephews (Jemima & Imran Khan’s sons) are super-devout Muslims.

The Labour Party is purging the anti-Semitic elements and Ed Miliband was the last leader. I don’t necessarily think it’s bad for the Jews but maybe for Israel (as the old aphorism goes, the left loves the Jews the right Israel).

Apart from naming bikes after himself I have no idea what Boris actually did as mayor and I say this as a Londoner.. He seemed to have simply been sulking that DC’s been PM all this while (the opposition sits on that side of the house but the enemy sits on ours).

I’d like Zac to win (I saw Sadiq voted for a fully elected HoL and I’m a deep believe in the hereditary peerage and their rights to sit in the upper House) but I don’t really care – if anything Zac’s ex-bro-in-law Imran Khan is a far bigger fanatic than Sadiq (who seems a super-moderate sort of chap).

Also it was pretty low of Zac to dredge up those mainly false allegations about Sadiq – race baiting at its worst.

* It’s not just Muslim politicians: white British leftists, such as Jeremy Corbyn, George Galloway, Ken Livingstone are making anti-Zionism respectable in the Labour party.

* The French and British nuclear arsenals should be the concern not just of Jews but of everyone. I have mentioned it on these pages before. I hope the US DoD is thinking about those arsenals. I would guess that Israel thinks about them. I would not place too much hope in US Jewry leading the charge against Muslim immigration though. Most are incurably liberal (2/3) and more importantly their institutions are captured entirely by that 2/3. Their motto and the motto of all liberal immigration proponents is: ” I may not agree with Muslims wanting to kill me, but I will fight to the death in order to protect a Muslim’s right to kill me”.

Posted in Islam, Jews | Comments Off on Will London Elect A Muslim Mayor?

One Cheer For Ted Cruz

Steve Sailer writes: With Ted Cruz apparently dropping out, I have to say that I think Cruz ran a relatively strong campaign from a technical standpoint. He’s not a natural leader of men, so for him to come in second out of almost a dozen and a half candidates shows a cunning and resourceful mind. Nixon would have been impressed. Cruz outlasted Scott Walker, Rick Perry, Jeb Bush, and Marco Rubio plus a whole bunch of people whom I’ve forgotten already.

Cruz early on in the campaign figured out that Donald Trump and the immigration issue were for real, so he did what he could to avoid running headlong into those intertwined juggernauts. Unfortunately for Cruz, Trump figured out fairly early that Cruz was his most formidable opponent and turned his fire on him.

COMMENTS:

* Now the political will get personal and will be about White women and whose side they’re on. Trump versus Hillary is going to be a massive Conversation on that.

* Don’t feel too sorry. In 1956 JFK tried and failed to get the Dems VP nomination. And he was just 7 years younger than Cruz will be in 2020 when he became President. Of course then Cruz’ Dad killed him but that’s another story.

* Cruz and Trump were cordial up to the point Cruz figured most of the heavy lifting was done and he could start playing hardball with Trump.

Yeah, Trump beat Cruz like he’s going to Hillary, but he didn’t do himself any favors running as a Dominionist, much like Hillary isn’t doing herself any favors running on “more violent foreigners and I’m taking your guns”.

If Cruz was the vaunted genius everyone thought, he would have united with Trump and spent 8 years as VP before running in 2024 as the heir to a successful President Trump. But no. He had to have it now.

* It felt as if his encounter with the Trump irregulars across the street was fatal. For average Cruz backers, not the Kool Aid politics-dweeb Twitaholic faction, that clip’s gotta hurt. And I sort of respect what he was quixotically going for there, but man, try to know the moment.

* It is strange how politics doesn’t seem to select for people of natural political ability in the same way that sports selects for people of natural athletic ability. It’s inconceivable that you could meet anyone who isn’t already a professional baseball player, and think “he could replace Mike Trout or Bryce Harper.” Yet I’ve met plenty of non-politicians who I thought would be more appealing presidential candidates than the current lot.

For example, Cruz is highly intelligent and strategically savvy…but isn’t there anyone else just as smart and savvy who also looks and sounds like a movie president?

Trump is “alpha” and very media savvy, but not obviously book smart in the same way that Cruz or Bobby Jindal are (and he’s been depantsed organizationally by Cruz, so his management skills are similarly questionable).

Hillary would never get anywhere near the presidency if “natural political ability” were as necessary to become president as “natural pitching ability” is to win the Cy Young award.

Rubio has a lot of natural political ability, but was mostly done in by his disastrous strategery (and he’s not any sort of intellectual). But it sure seems like in a nation of 300 million people, there ought to be someone of comparable looks/charisma to Rubio who isn’t pro-amnesty, and is just a little bit smarter.

Politics clearly selects for some quality other than the surface qualities of intelligence, looks, charisma, debating ability, etc. Perhaps cravenness, or dumb luck?

* He ran a bit of a copycat campaign. Unfortunately for him, he isn’t very likable. The more people got to know him, the more they didn’t like him. Trump is good at exploiting people’s personal flaws.

* In his defense, he did stand up to the trannies (can you even imagine having to argue this point in 1970, the year he was born?), and was apparently the only candidate in either party to call out the twisted women-in-combat trend.

There might have been a more nuanced way to deal with ethanol subsidies– like limiting them to farmers using ethanol and only ethanol in all their vehicles. But NYC and Chicago developers meet their match in corrupting influences in Iowa farmers.

Posted in Ted Cruz | Comments Off on One Cheer For Ted Cruz

Blacks & Property Values

I remember one Saturday morning at an Orthodox shul in 90035, the speaker during the announcements noted the new soul food restaurant on Pico Blvd, and said that if its owner knew something that we didn’t, we should all sell our homes quickly.

Steve Sailer writes:

From the Washington Post:

‘This can’t happen by accident.’

For generations, African Americans have faced unique barriers to owning a home — and enjoying the wealth it brings. In Atlanta, where predominantly black neighborhoods are still waiting for the recovery, the link between race and real estate fortune is stark.

By Emily Badger Wonkblog May 2, 2016

SOUTH DEKALB COUNTY, Ga. — When the new subdivisions were rising everywhere here in the 1990s and early 2000s, with hundreds and hundreds of fine homes on one-acre lots carved out of the Georgia forest, the price divide between this part of De­Kalb County and the northern part wasn’t so vast.

Now, a house that looks otherwise identical in South DeKalb, on the edge of Atlanta, might sell for half what it would in North DeKalb. The difference has widened over the years of the housing boom, bust and recovery, and Wayne Early can’t explain it.

The people here make good money, he says. They have good jobs. Their homes are built of the same sturdy brick. Early, an economic development consultant and real estate agent, can identify only one obvious difference that makes property here worth so much less.

“This can’t happen by accident,” he says. “It’s too tightly correlated with race for it to be based on something else.”

The communities in South DeKalb are almost entirely African American, and they reflect a housing disparity that emerges across the Atlanta metropolitan area and the nation. According to a new Washington Post analysis, the higher a Zip code’s share of black residents in the Atlanta region, the worse its housing values have fared over the past turbulent housing cycle.

It’s sad, but true: blacks tend to be bad for property values. One reason even in well-kept up, low crime middle class black neighborhoods is because people aren’t just buying a house, they are buying schoolmates for their children. There’s also a bigger danger that a middle class black neighborhood will slip into an underclass neighborhood than in a comparable white neighborhood, since middle class blacks are more likely to have nephews and so forth come live with them, Fresh Prince of Bel-Air style. A foreclosure issue is that blacks have fewer affluent relatives to borrow from to help them get over life’s bumps.

Part of the bursting of the Housing Bubble in 2007-2008 was the unexpected rediscovery that old stereotypes about black and Hispanic neighborhoods being poor investments tend to be true.

COMMENTS:

* Large numbers of whites move to a geographic region, there is an explosion of innovation, new businesses, development. The whole area gentrifies, properties shoot up, etc.

Large numbers of blacks move to an area, government dependency shoots up, low income housing shoots up, the schools go down the tubes, crime jumps, property values drop.

If you control for the individual family, same type of job, same type of income, the family that chooses to move around the gentrifying upwardly mobile types which tend to be more ethnically white will see housing value appreciate, and the family that moves to the ethnically black neighborhood will see housing value drop.

* Just explain to me why when whites move into the neighborhood, it’s bad for black people and when whites refuse to move into the neighborhood it’s also bad for black people. Good luck.

* It’s called free association.

In the old authentic America you had the right to live with people of your choosing.

In the new fraudulent pseudo-America you are forced to live with aliens and hostiles.

The core outrage of all of this is:

Who invented the towns? The neighborhoods? Who invented the water supplies? The power supplies? The entire infrastructure that supplanted the raw wilderness that was there previously?

Whites created it all but now have no claim to it as whites. Which results in —-of course—- white dispossession.

Legalized racial dispossession of the founding stock of any nation on the planet is very rare. It usually only occurs as a result of total defeat on the battlefield.

The amount of white sweat equity that was transferred to aliens in towns across just California in the past thirty years must be a trillion dollars at least. Whole towns invented and hacked out of the wilderness by whites have been transferred to new occupants. This occurred through ethnic cleansing and it wasn’t nonviolent.

* Steve do low crime Black neighborhoods even exist in Los Angeles? From what I have read, even Baldwin Hills has a high crime problem because they are located way too geographically close to The Jungle, which has housing projects like you see in Training Day.

* The same disparity is seen in Montgomery (white) vs. Prince George’s (black) counties of Maryland, both DC suburbs catering to at least middle class DC government employees. Blacks have done well in government employment and these in Prince George’s are the cream of that crop. But still their schools are doing poorly esp. on test results.

* “…middle class blacks are more likely to have nephews and so forth come live with them…”

Uh-huh. Also those same homeowners are likely to have their own children “come to live with them.” And the more successful and affluent those middle-class black parents are, the more salient reversion toward the mean among their offspring will be.

Any potential white buyers can look fifteen years into the future of a new middle-class black suburb and correctly predict the likely swell of boorishness and crime as the aging middle-class black suburbanites lose control of their maturing spawn, flush with the strength of youth and morally liberated by BLM/BAMN/flavor-of-the-week agitators.

* Blacks aren’t necessarily getting a “better deal” finding cheaper homes in black neighborhoods. Yes, life in black neighborhoods will be easier for them that it would be for whites, but those neighborhoods are still much higher in crime, and black criminals are more than happy to target blacks. Blacks who can afford to often try to live in white neighborhoods.

* Tired of the white/black racial duopoly in these msm articles. It’s fraud. All of the other racial groups are magically disappeared from the calculus.

These rotten media outlets will continue the dishonest white/black duopoly until they are forced to include Asians Hispanics etc.

Let’s discuss the Asian/black achievement gap, shall we?

And why aren’t Asians mixing with blacks in all corners of society? Where are the 50-50 Asian-black neighborhoods? Churches? Schools? Businesses?

Dark conclusions come to mind when one notices Asian reluctance to embrace black America.

* Regardless of ethnicity, low property values are good for buyers and bad for owners and sellers. The article is focused on the fact that black home owners aren’t getting the home appreciation benefits that whites are. And this is true.

From a mindset of individual meritocracy, this really isn’t fair. Black individuals are financially punished for choosing to self-segregate with their own ethnic group. White individuals are rewarded for self-segregating. And this isn’t due to individual merit, it’s due to group merit.

From another viewpoint, groups of whites are building better neighborhoods and communities than groups of blacks. It’s not white people’s fault that groups of blacks aren’t building nicer neighborhoods and cultural capital. Groups of Asians are surely building better neighborhoods than groups of blacks and politically, it’s not feasible to blame Asians. Politically, the left will need to find a way to blame white and justify redistribution and robbing Peter to pay Paul.

* Sure, low cost housing is a benefit to new buyers, but it’s bad for long time owners and sellers. And blacks aren’t getting the home value appreciation benefits that whites are. That is real.

However, this is largely because groups of blacks don’t make great neighborhoods that shoot up in value like other ethnic groups. And the liberals are trying to find ways to pin that blame onto whites and justify big government redistribution. Note that they aren’t considering Mexicans or Asians because those ethnic groups aren’t politically viable marks to seize money from.

* …if blacks were building great neighborhoods, people would want to move there, and they would rise in value, and nothing whites or Asians or Mexicans do would stop that.

The problem is that when large numbers of blacks move to a neighborhood, crime goes up, schools go down, government dependence goes up, business innovation goes down, the service industry weakens, and economic growth slows.

* Blacks are bad for property values, who’d a thunk.

A couple of years ago in Newark, New Jersey, people were literally selling their houses for pennies and dollars to get out of Dodge. Newark used to be the most dangerous city in the country, now Camden takes the top spot if I remember correctly, though I think Chicago and their pace for 700 murders this year will dethrone Camden.

When my family first came to America they settled in Newark. It was a completely different city back then. Full of hard-working white immigrants, that is until the 67 or 69 riots I forget which. After that, all perishable food markets left the city and all people had to travel miles out of the city to get food.

Serves them right.

* No matter how ‘respectable’, ‘cultured’, ‘polite’ ‘well-mannered’, ‘well educated’ and ‘well spoken’ any given Afro-American appears to be, you can bet the farm that he is closely related to a stereotypical ghetto thug.

The statistics bear this out. Such a vast proportion of the male African American has been incarcerated at least one time in their lives that by sheer force of random probability you can be sure that *every* Afro-American is closely related to a violent thug.

* OT, but the discovery of marijuana at the homes of the Rhoden family in Pike County, Ohio is now leading to speculation that they were murdered by drug dealers – perhaps members of a Mexican cartel.

If that happens to be the case and the murderers are illegal aliens, it’s interesting to speculate what the political ramifications might be.

* I grew up in Dekalb, back in the 70′s. It was the place to be. Now it’s a third world shit hole, and every night on the news, there’s another grieving black momma/grandmomma in Stone Mountain whose thug son has shot someone or been shot. Or whose whose toddler child/grandchild in Lithonia has been run over by a fleeing thug or by the pursuing cop. Or whose daughter has been raped by a thug in Avondale. Or whose home on Memorial Drive has been burglarized or invaded by thugs. And it’s always in south Dekalb. Some portion of the county government is always under investigation, facing probation or being sanctioned. And they keep sending Cynthia McKinneys and Hank Johnsons to DC. So yes, the South Dekalb situation is very tightly tied to race.

* They are trying to blame the problems of black neighborhoods on white neighborhoods that have had success. The instant you consider successful Asian neighborhoods and Hispanic neighborhoods, the logic becomes absurd.

There is a whole political apparatus setup to blame whites for the ills of the world and seize their communities and assets for redistribution. But, the instant they try to expand blame whitey to blame whitey and Asians and even some Hispanics, they will lose political viability.

From Nelson Mandela’s autobiography:

“Ngabelungu” is a Xhosa expression that means, “It is the whites [fault]”

* The vast majority of Blacks can not afford to purchase a home in affluent predominantly Asian suburbs in California like Arcadia and Cupertino, so does that make Asians anti-Black racists?

* So Blacks are benefiting from cheaper prices for identical housing. Sounds like a good thing.

* I stayed with friends in one of these new, upper middle class majority-black (I saw multiple white families) developments in Atlanta in 2007: the houses really were well built (much nicer than the McMansions I’ve been in in the North from the same period, maybe because of lower cost structures), the woods next to each house were very pretty, the neighbors were excited to visit each other and hang out.

But the combination of greater family instability and reversion of income to a lower mean is a bad one-two punch; and a layoff and an ugly divorce later my friends were short-selling their house three years later, in 2010. I had heard they could hardly get anything for it, relative to what they paid.

* I wish. But the 14th Amendment has been held in various SCOTUS decisions to trump everything that came before it i.e. it’s a new government, a coup by the winners of the War of Northern Aggression. Then SCOTUS came out with further doctrines like “separate isn’t equal enough” and so they restrict your ability to avoid mixing.

* This is just the free market setting the correct price on black-owned homes. The more the government mucks with that, the bigger the problems that are gonna ensue, like the housing bubble explosion.

* Asians are Schrödinger Whites. They’re considered white when doing so helps the left (see: the alleged “diversity deficiency” in Silicon Valley) and considered non-white when that helps the left (“muh cultural appropiation”).

* Black males have a one in three lifetime incarceration risk.
So, the probability of any random black male *not* ever being incarcerated is roughly 0.66.
Consider all the close relations, brothers, nephews, uncles, father, sons, cousins, in-laws etc that each and every black male must have. As a ballpark figure, allow 10 of those all told.
0.66 to the power of 10, the probability of *no* close criminal male relation must be a vanishingly small number.

* You can use this site (among others) to check out all the demographic stats of whatever zip codes you want: zipwho.com.

* In the 1990s NYC cabbies were being slaughtered–35-45 per year.

The cabbies were overwhelmingly NAMs.

The cabbies stopped taking fares from lower Manhattan to the ghetto at night.

Danny Glover complained to the NYC taxi commission about this NAM on NAM discrimination. Giuliani cracked down on cabbies. The slaughter continued.

* That’s why we need to send the Homosexual Gentrifier Shock Troops into the ghetto to drive up house values and create wealth for black homeowners! Just think how wonderful it will be for ghetto dwellers when their house prices double or triple! Think of all the Black Wealth that will be created!

Joking aside, this article points out the silliness of SJW thinking.

If ghetto homes INCREASE in value, SJWs bitch about the “institutional racism” of “unaffordable housing” or “gentrification” and insist that white folks pay for “affordable housing”.

If ghetto homes DECREASE in value, SJWs bitch about the “institutional racism” that depresses the price of ghetto homes and prevents black folks from “accumulating wealth” in their homes.

Mess with their heads. When you read an article like this, circle back on them:

“Wait! So what you are saying is that Atlanta has plenty of ‘affordable housing’ for blacks, but very little ‘affordable housing’ for whites? We need to eliminate this ‘institutional racism’ against whites! Whites need to have a ‘white homebuyers subsidy’ until this housing price disparity is eliminated!”

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Blacks & Property Values

I Want To Smooth Out My Rough Edges

When I send an email or start a conversation, I usually get going with whatever is on my mind, while the people I admire start with, “I trust you are well. I was just thinking about you and wondering how you were doing…”

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on I Want To Smooth Out My Rough Edges