Diversity Destroys Trust

From Chateau Heartiste: Mass non-white immigration to white countries erodes social trust, which decreases the support for wealth redistribution to groups of swarthies who act and look very differently than your friends and family, hence increased “economic freedom”.

Related: A reader forwards this ROK piece by Roosh:

The Western elite, especially in Europe, got into power by pushing peace, harmony, equal opportunity, and multiculturalism, but beneath these feel-good concepts includes the blueprint for destruction of the very force that threatens their power: nationalism. Introducing massive numbers of Muslims, Mexicans, or destitute Somalian refugees into your nation reduces the likelihood that you will look to your neighbor and see someone like you, a brother-in-arms who can help you rise up against the cyclical inevitability of a corrupt government ruling over you.

Now that you see a dozen different colors surrounding you on the subway and in the Starbucks, some of whom are looking at you suspiciously, you feel distrustful of these outsiders because they have a different background and belief system than you do. You find yourself in a diluted world culture with standardized gadgets, entertainment, and government-friendly talking points conveniently disseminated by all media outlets. Now instead of looking to your neighbor to help fight against governmental oppression, you will seek comfort in your own amusements, Facebook feeds, internet memes, and legalized marijuana. You turn inwards to satisfy your hedonistic needs while allowing the government to run over your rights and push policies that you feel increasingly helpless to fight in your social isolation.

This is all done by design. The liberal governments of the West will allow the collateral damage of terrorist acts because they need those immigrants to defeat the greater threat to their power: national identity. Destroy the culture and you remove a citizen’s motivation to fight for a nation he would have given his life for not three generation ago. Immigration must not stop because the liberal elite must maintain their power, and the useful idiots in the media and academia will continue spinning the narrative required to ensure that happens. The death of twelve lives or 1,200 is inconsequential.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on Diversity Destroys Trust

Mattress Girl Made A Porno

Chateau Heartiste: This is a Nimitz Class Attention Whore (and Control Freak; she wants to shove her smelly snatch in men’s faces and sadistically deny their male sexuality by demanding their desexualized consideration). And there’s no doubt she’s the type of chick (there are an uncomfortably large number of them) who gets off dreaming about a rapist having his way with her.

In the past, attention whores of this magnitude would violate only a handful of people’s lives… those closest to them. And they would be discarded once their friends and family caught on to their sickness and gave up showering them with the sympathetic ardor they crave. We see with the rise of the internet and social media that the insufferable attention whore has a new lease on her vampiric, emotion-sucking malevolence. The online world has enabled her like no BFF or doting mother could; it has not created a monster, but turned a monster into a contagion, devouring cultures whole.

Posted in Feminism | Comments Off on Mattress Girl Made A Porno

How Men And Women Treat Those With Low SMV (Sexual Market Value)

From Reddit Redpill:

* Look at the language different genders use for those they find unattractive.

If a man sees a woman with low SMV, he will only judge her on a skin deep level. Ugly, butterface, small tits, fatass, etc. Since we don’t find women sexually attractive because of their personality, being unattractive does not make them a bad person to us. We won’t call an ugly woman a creep, we won’t call a woman with small breasts pathetic. They may become invisible to us, but there is no real inner hatred for them.

But a woman? When a woman sees a man with low SMV, it’s personal. Creep, loser, pathetic. These are all words flung around by even the sweetest of women at men they find unattractive. Since women are attracted to what to more than just surface level physical attraction, an unattractive man isn’t just ugly, fat, or any of that. He’s a bad person. This is why it’s so easy for women to treat low SMV men like shit, to manipulate and despise them. Low SMV men aren’t just unattractive or invisible, they’re dirt.

Feminists may say this is what they want, to be judged for their actions and personality rather than on a purely physical level. However, once again, the watch what she does and not what she says principle applies. Why? Because there is one thing men do that absolutely infuriates women. Slut shaming. This is a direct attack on women’s character for actions they’ve done in the past, and they can’t stand it. Once again proving that women want all the good things about being a man with absolutely none of the negatives.

* The mere presence of a low SMV man is not offensive to women, because low-SMV men are literally invisible to women; they literally do not even see an invisible low SMV man…

…until he hits on her. Then, that is when his presence becomes “offensive”. And it is “offensive”, because it forces a woman to perform self-introspection; i.e., she begins thinking to herself, “is this the caliber of man I attract?” “Am I putting on weight?” “Did I put on my makeup this morning?”

She starts looking at a low-SMV man hitting on her as an affront to her own SMV. So in order to avoid taking agency for her own self, she projects those disgusting feelings onto the low-SMV man hitting on her. He’s a bad person because he made her feel like a low SMV girl.

* It’s biological; this argument is extremely simplistic, but a natural represents good DNA. Good, masculine looks and a healthy upbringing led him to be confident as a kid, which led him to make friends and be a leader of his friend group, and his positive behaviors were reinforced and got him attention. He was always one of the cooler kids, so he never had problems getting a girl, so he developed confidence with women as a result of always being able to have someone around due to his physical and social value. He’s not necessarily “good DNA”, but chances are, the golden boy natural playboy statistically represents better, stronger DNA as well as ability to provide for that DNA.

The guy who was a loser, say he naturally was weak, spindly, and bullied (aka physically inferior to other guys), developed loser habits, like extreme self consciousness, aversion to risk taking, fear of confrontation, etc. Even though someone with perfectly robust DNA could wind up in this situation, in our primitive minds, we know it’s statistically likely that the guy who’s a loser has bad “nature” as well as bad “nurture”. Being low SMV is fine; you get ID’d as suboptimal DNA. When you improve your SMV, you are walking shit-tier DNA that is wearing the clothes of superior DNA.

You are essentially the most risky trap a woman can fall on, something that in caveman times would endanger her life, and more importantly, her lineage. Old aversions do not die, even though times have changed to the point where plenty of people with poor DNA are naturals and people with good DNA are losers. The loser who improves is odious to her subconscious not because he himself is repulsive or immoral, but because he actually threatens her biological function (to get the best genes she can get).

When you make it to the top, torch your past. Burn all your old pics, nuke your social media. Your climb means everything to you, but to women, it’s a “L” branded onto your forehead.

* If you want to get a real, possibly painful, introduction to your SMV, then take a job in a public environment with a steady stream of new college girls forced to interact with you. This happened to me about 3 years ago and its been brutal. All my life I had experienced the quick eye lock, look away maneuver from pretty girls. But when you work in a cubicle or construction site, you don’t have to own it everyday. Once it starts happening several times a day, you either change for the better, or wilt. Actually one of the best things that’s happened to me in several years.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on How Men And Women Treat Those With Low SMV (Sexual Market Value)

How To Let Go Of Narcissism

Walter emails: I believe I can instruct someone on how to dismantle their own narcissism. Ultimately, it’s you who’s got to do it anyway, That’s why narcs are so impossible to treat. A therapist cannot do it for you. However, at a young age, I had the insight to know what I had and I took a few steps to “self treat” myself. I believe the steps I took worked quite well. The concepts are easy. It may not be easy for a narc to follow the concepts but I got through it just fine.

I believe my narcissism was mostly rooted in genetics. My father was a narc, all four of my siblings are narcs and my only child is a narc. I believe narcissism, sociopathy and psychopathy are all one in the same. I often use these terms interchangeably. If your biologically rooted in psychopathy, that does not mean your a bad person. Most of the narcs in my family are actually good people, although they remain a bit quirky.

Step One: Tell the truth. All narcs lie. All narcs lie all the time. It’s absolutely key that you start brutal honesty with everyone. Of course, you wouldn’t tell an ugly woman she’s ugly. But just short of needlessly hurting someone’s feelings, fess up and let the cards play where they lay. There is a reason why this is key. It’s all about habits. Once you get in the habit of telling truth, it becomes increasingly hard to lie to yourself… and lying to yourself is the bedrock of narcissism. Once you start worshipping the God of truth, you will start to catch yourself in lies you are telling yourself.

We will never be completely normal. However, it is a complete myth that we have anything missing in our brains or personalities. Current research backs this up. Narcs/ Sociopath/ Psychopaths are NOT incapable of empathy. Research and common sense backs this up too. If a narc is after a girl, for example, the narc can be extremely empathetic. Ergo, there is a manual empathy switch that we can flip on anytime we like.

Step 2, practice empathy all the time. Turn that empathy switch on as if you were after a girl and never turn it off. I’ve been “practicing empathy” for over 40 years. I’ve been doing it for so long that in no longer feels alien to me. I own the empathy I practice as if it came naturally… and indeed by now it does come quite naturally. I have transformed myself into a good person. You can too…

I was born to a protestant family but have been a vocal atheist since around age 9. I believe I’ve paid a dear price for my non-conformity but “to thyn own self be true”. Religious dogma has always been a jacket ill fitting and uncomfortable. Roughly half my family are fundamentalist Christian and those folks have shunned me.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Narcissism | Comments Off on How To Let Go Of Narcissism

Do The Strict Ethics Of Torah Make It Difficult For Jews To Compete?

“I know the Torah is pretty clear about certain practices. I know that the Talmud interprets the law in ways that may seem to contradict the letter, if not the spirit of the Torah. I know that business practices by Jews have been shaped not just by the religion, but also by the cultures in which they operate. It may not be fair to contrast American Jews with WASPS. It may be fairer to compare them with non Northern European immigrants to the United States. I don’t know if they are more or less unethical than Greek or Italian immigrants, or for that matter Hungarian or Russian immigrants.” (Friend)

Posted in Ethics, Jews | Comments Off on Do The Strict Ethics Of Torah Make It Difficult For Jews To Compete?

I Stand With Israel

Things Cuckservatives say:

“Sadly, most victims of black crime are other blacks.”
“Unions destroyed Detroit”
“I’m all for legal immigration, just not illegal immigration”
“America is safe and free thanks to our troops.”
“Only terrorists would have a reason to oppose the Patriot Act.”
“America is a nation of immigrants.”
“I don’t agree with everything [Buchanan/Coulter/CH/etc] says, but…”
“I’m not a racist but…”
“I don’t care if you’re black, white, green, or purple, but…”
“Edward Snowden is a traitor”
“I stand with Israel”
“Family values don’t stop at the Rio Grande”
“Putin is the new Hitler”
“There is no room for hate and bigotry in the Republican party”
“We must court the Latino vote to stay relevant”

Posted in Conservatives | Comments Off on I Stand With Israel

The fastest-growing migrant group to the US since 2000 are Africans

Chateau Heartiste: Apparently, President Downlow, in agreement with his predecessor George “Cuckya” Bush, believes America isn’t hurtling toward third world shitstain status fast enough. Fifty million amerindians are great and all, but think about the glorious mocha future we can hasten by throwing in a few tens of millions of Sudanese, Somalis, Ethiopians, and Congolese!

The Econocuck goes out of its race cucking way to contrast African migrants with African-Americans, in which the former do favorably compare. However, the first waves of African migrants are undoubtedly the cream of the dark continent crop. But, as with most self-selecting immigration from “civilizationallly challenged” backwaters, past immigrant performance is no guarantee of future results.

Regression to the mean doesn’t stop operating once it crosses the Atlantic. Expect the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren of today’s immigrant Africans to perform gradually worse on all the social indicators that matter (abilities to twerk and balance a forty on one’s protruding buttocks should stay strong, though).

Worse, even if regression to the mean were dampened by heretofore unidentified contingencies, a larger threat to American unity, or what’s left of it, looms. Once high-performing, “white sheep” African immigrants have a foothold in the US, they will generate a chain migration reaction that hauls in millions more of their less accomplished District Nine-ians. This is the reality of mass migration from shitholes: You can cheat the social destruction of the destination country for a while by selecting for, or being fortunate to have preselected for you, the best of a bad lot, but eventually, given no brakes on the process and the fact that there are only so many high achievers from shitholes to cherry-pick, the depressing heft of the migrants’ third world cesspits heaves and lurches into coterminous first world territory, irretrievably and inexorably fashioning its new host nation into a sad, slummy simulacrum of the corrugated-roofed market bazaar they left behind.

Posted in Africa | Comments Off on The fastest-growing migrant group to the US since 2000 are Africans

Diversity Is Destroying America

Comment to Chateau Heartiste:

Here is the tale of a white woman (25) who had at least two children with a white man. Both children are beautiful white blond/blue specimens. So, for whatever reason, the white woman splits from her white husband (probably because, as a Beta male, he finally succumbed to the fact that you cannot train a whore not to be a whore, despite the Pretty Woman, White Knight fantasies), and gets involved with a black man who does not work, has raped his former gf (probably more), has a long list of violent criminal offenses (those are just the once that he got caught for, that is), and was left the WATCH the two children – the boy just a toddler, and the girl a mere 5-year-old, while she worked at a strip club! Now, did you get that? This stripper left her two small blond/blue children with an unemployed black man who was a violent, drug-addicted rapist.

And so, the boy has now disappeared, and the police say the negro male is lying about someone stealing him out of the car while he went back inside to DO COCAINE before picking up the white trash female.

Where to start (as I want to SCREAM)?
* Did he just kill the blue-eyed devil, or sell him to some pedophile for some easy drug money?
* Get rid of the boy, as no need for him, but keep the girl for sex and future income (prostitute) potential (like her mom)?
* How many times has the blond girl been sexually abused by this negro while left alone with him for hours at a time? Hope the doctors examine her.
* Where is the real father? I would rather kill the mother and go to jail, so that the children go to the grandparents or foster care – where at least they would have had a chance at a decent life.
* Where are the motherly instincts of the woman? Besides all of the obvious arguments regarding her stupid decision to get involved with any black man, let alone a POS like this one, where is her natural protective instincts for her young?

As to the last point, above, I liken this behavior to animals in a zoo, that give birth in unnatural environments and have no parenting skills, sometimes outright killing their young. That sums up this female, and this putrid society that we now live in.

Posted in Crime | Comments Off on Diversity Is Destroying America

Saving Black Bodies

Steve Sailer writes:

I have found that, in the African-American oral tradition, if the words are enunciated eloquently enough, no one examines the meaning for definitive truth.

—Biracial novelist Mat Johnson, Loving Day, 2015

America’s foremost public intellectual, Ta-Nehisi Coates, has published a new best-selling minibook, Between the World and Me, that’s interesting for what it reveals about a forbidden subject: the psychological damage done by pervasive black violence to soft, sensitive, bookish souls such as Coates. The Atlantic writer’s black radical parents forced the frightened child to grow up in Baltimore’s black community, where he lived in constant terror of the other boys. Any white person who wrote as intensely about how blacks scared him would be career-crucified out of his job, so it’s striking to read Coates recounting at length how horrible it is to live around poor blacks if you are a timid, retiring sort.

Coates’ lack of physical courage is a common and perfectly reasonable trait, although writers typically cover it up. For example, Hunter S. Thompson transmuted his recurrent paranoia about impending carnage (which beset him even in venues as family-friendly as the Circus-Circus casino) into hallucinatory comedy in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

Coates, however, is humorless. Worse, his fans have encouraged him to believe he is the second coming of James Baldwin, egging him on to indulge in a prophetic-hysteric-postmodern style that is easier to parody (e.g., just repeat endlessly the phrase “black bodies” and the distractingly stupid formulation “people who believe they are white”) than it is to endure over even the course of Coates’ very short second autobiography. (As with the president, both of Coates’ books are memoirs.)

“Coates has thus elaborated a theory of history in which everything bad ever done by blacks is the fault of American whites (whom he describes—metaphorically, I hope—as ‘cannibals’).”

White writers have seldom had the courage to confess their fear of black violence so fully, at least not since 1963, when Norman Podhoretz responded to the hullabaloo over James Baldwin with an essay about growing up in Brooklyn in the 1930s and 1940s:

And so for a long time I was puzzled to think that…Negroes were supposed to be persecuted when it was the Negroes who were doing the only persecuting I knew about—and doing it, moreover, to me…. A city boy’s world is contained within three or four square blocks, and in my world it was the whites, the Italians and Jews, who feared the Negroes, not the other way around. The Negroes were tougher than we were, more ruthless, and on the whole they were better athletes…. Yet my sister’s opinions, like print, were sacred, and when she told me about exploitation and economic forces I believed her. I believed her, but I was still afraid of Negroes.

In the 52 years since Podhoretz’s “My Negro Problem—And Ours,” overwhelming evidence has piled up validating the prescience of his boyhood traumas at the hands of black juvenile delinquents. But it’s precisely because the scale of black violence over the past half century is so blatantly obvious that white intellectuals have been largely self-silenced on the topic—even as the most cunning minds among today’s liberal whites plot to reverse the mistake their grandparents made in fearfully ceding much of the best urban turf to black criminality.

The central real estate question of this century has become: How can big cities drop their hot potato of poor urban blacks in the laps of naive suburbs and small towns? That helps explain the unhinged reaction among elites to Donald Trump publicly pointing out that Mexico isn’t sending us its highest-quality citizens to be our illegal aliens. The unspoken plan is to continue to use the more docile Hispanics newcomers to shove the more dangerous African-American citizens out of desirable cities; thus, only a class traitor like Trump would dare allude to the unfortunate side effects suffered by the rest of the country.

Despite all the violence Coates has suffered at the hands of other blacks, his racial loyalty remains admirably adamantine. Thus, his ploy, as psychologically transparent as it is popular with liberal whites, is to blame his lifelong petrified unhappiness on the white suburbanites he envied for being able to live far from black thugs.

Unfortunately for Coates’ persuasiveness, white people, unlike blacks, have never actually done anything terribly bad to him. The worst memory he can dredge up is the time an Upper West Side white woman pushed his 4-year-old son to get the dawdling kid to stop clogging an escalator exit. She even had the racist nerve to say, “Come on!”

Coates reacted as unreasonably as a guest star on Seinfeld would. Ever since this Escalator Incident, he’s been dwelling on how, while it might have looked like yet another example of blacks behaving badly, it was, when you stop to think about slavery and Crow (not to mention redlining), really all the fault of whites.

The central event in Between the World and Me is the fatal shooting in 2000 of an acquaintance from Howard U. by an undercover deputy from Prince George County, the country’s most affluent black-majority county. Coates refers to this tragedy repeatedly as proof of America’s demonic drive to destroy black bodies. (The dead man’s family, I found, was eventually awarded $3.7 million in their wrongful-death suit, much like the $3 million awarded to the parents of a teen gunned down by an undercover Obama Administration agent in a shooting that I investigated in 2010. You have never heard of my local police blotter item, though, because the victim was white.)

Since I’m a horrible person, my immediate response to Coates’ tale was…okay…black-run county, affirmative-action hiring, and poor police decision-making…you know, I bet the shooter cop was black.

And sure enough, the Carlton Jones who shot Prince Jones turned out to be black. Coates eventually gets around to briefly admitting that awkward fact, but only after seven pages of purple prose about people who believe they are whites destroying black bodies.

COMMENTS ON TAKIMAG:

* I’m still really creeped out by the obsession with “bodies” in Coates’ rhetoric, and I’ve seen it elsewhere as well. The phrase “black bodies” appears over and over again.

Questions I don’t expect to ever have answered: Why wouldn’t they refer to “black people” or “black human beings”? Why “black bodies?” Do they reject the concept of a soul? How about at least a personality? Is what animates the body somehow useless? Does the phrase “white bodies” ever appear?

It’s just a very strange way of referring to people and persons. It’s dehumanizing. Is that the point, then? Like, evil whites have dehumanized blacks, so they’re just “bodies” to us?

* I think he alludes to the liberal shtick that “race is only skin deep”. There isn’t anything differentiating whites and blacks other than their bodies. “Black people” would also imply a black mind, one that decides to commit crime and whatnot. The “black body” is seen as an external element upon which whites project their prejudice, making it commit crime and whatnot…
In other words, a black is seen as such and such only because he has a “black body”.

* It’s that “soft racism of low expectations” thing. Libs think anyone not in the R1b-L11 haplogroup are passive carbon units who are simply extras, victims, the chorus, or oompa loompas on the world’s stage. They’re just drones waiting to be activated and reprogrammed by the glorious rainbow. Until then, they have no control of their destinies, but are controlled by invisible beams of whiteness.

* “Black body” is a term used in physics. It has a certain poetic resonance, therefore in spite of their knowing nothing about its original meaning, it is a candidate for appropriation by rap artists such as Te Nehisi Coates.

You won’t go far wrong in believing that everything a black person says is for verbal effect only, just nonsensical glitter and sparkle. Don’t expect anything a black man says to hold coherent meaning or correspond to any state or condition in the world. They share this gift for flamboyant, verbal dexterity with their enablers and handlers, Eskimo trial lawyers.

* The “bodies” thing is meant to push the “slavery” button. Low-grade agitprop. They don’t even do propaganda well. Must be whitey’s fault.

* I watched over the decades as the inner city of Milwaukee was destroyed by blacks spreading like locusts and destroying everything in their wake. Now much of the inner city looks like a wasteland. Of course hundreds of millions of millions if not billions of Federal money have been dumped in new construction in these neighborhoods. They still remain hell holes of violence and crime. White people were terrorized out of these stable neighborhoods. Law abiding blacks also met a similar fate.

* I read that article by Podhoretz long ago and remember that his solution to the problem was to use blacks to breed whites out of existence. You see, for Podhoretz and his clan, the problem wasn’t blacks, it was whites since you could simply move out of a black neighborhood:

“I share this hope, but I cannot see how it will ever be realized unless color does in fact disappear: and that means not integration, it means assimilation, it means—let the brutal word come out—miscegenation.”

Whenever a politician endorsed immigration restrictions he brought up “The Holocaust” claiming that any attempt to curtail open immigration would lead to the annihilation of his tribe, his race. The consensus amongst the race of Podhoretz was that “Intolerance” led to “The Holocaust” because Europeans, especially Germans regarded his tribe an “alien, nearly monolithic and subversive force whose main goal is to destroy Western Civilization”. Anyone like Joe Sobran who wanted to preserve Western civilization was of course an intolerant Nazi conspiracy theorist.

Podhoretz had one central fear about the physical safety of his race and articulated a final solution. It was nothing less than the destruction of Christianity and the elimination of whites. The promotion of blacks by organizing them as a force of miscegenation, the desire to flood white countries with third-world immigration and a burning hatred of Christ can’t be denied.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Saving Black Bodies

Russia For Russians

Russians belong in a land whose traditional form of government suits their cunning and brutish ways. And their women are often whores, incapable of feeling human emotion. Unleashed on the West, they are predators.

Posted in Russia | Comments Off on Russia For Russians