* Look at the language different genders use for those they find unattractive.
If a man sees a woman with low SMV, he will only judge her on a skin deep level. Ugly, butterface, small tits, fatass, etc. Since we don’t find women sexually attractive because of their personality, being unattractive does not make them a bad person to us. We won’t call an ugly woman a creep, we won’t call a woman with small breasts pathetic. They may become invisible to us, but there is no real inner hatred for them.
But a woman? When a woman sees a man with low SMV, it’s personal. Creep, loser, pathetic. These are all words flung around by even the sweetest of women at men they find unattractive. Since women are attracted to what to more than just surface level physical attraction, an unattractive man isn’t just ugly, fat, or any of that. He’s a bad person. This is why it’s so easy for women to treat low SMV men like shit, to manipulate and despise them. Low SMV men aren’t just unattractive or invisible, they’re dirt.
Feminists may say this is what they want, to be judged for their actions and personality rather than on a purely physical level. However, once again, the watch what she does and not what she says principle applies. Why? Because there is one thing men do that absolutely infuriates women. Slut shaming. This is a direct attack on women’s character for actions they’ve done in the past, and they can’t stand it. Once again proving that women want all the good things about being a man with absolutely none of the negatives.
* The mere presence of a low SMV man is not offensive to women, because low-SMV men are literally invisible to women; they literally do not even see an invisible low SMV man…
…until he hits on her. Then, that is when his presence becomes “offensive”. And it is “offensive”, because it forces a woman to perform self-introspection; i.e., she begins thinking to herself, “is this the caliber of man I attract?” “Am I putting on weight?” “Did I put on my makeup this morning?”
She starts looking at a low-SMV man hitting on her as an affront to her own SMV. So in order to avoid taking agency for her own self, she projects those disgusting feelings onto the low-SMV man hitting on her. He’s a bad person because he made her feel like a low SMV girl.
* It’s biological; this argument is extremely simplistic, but a natural represents good DNA. Good, masculine looks and a healthy upbringing led him to be confident as a kid, which led him to make friends and be a leader of his friend group, and his positive behaviors were reinforced and got him attention. He was always one of the cooler kids, so he never had problems getting a girl, so he developed confidence with women as a result of always being able to have someone around due to his physical and social value. He’s not necessarily “good DNA”, but chances are, the golden boy natural playboy statistically represents better, stronger DNA as well as ability to provide for that DNA.
The guy who was a loser, say he naturally was weak, spindly, and bullied (aka physically inferior to other guys), developed loser habits, like extreme self consciousness, aversion to risk taking, fear of confrontation, etc. Even though someone with perfectly robust DNA could wind up in this situation, in our primitive minds, we know it’s statistically likely that the guy who’s a loser has bad “nature” as well as bad “nurture”. Being low SMV is fine; you get ID’d as suboptimal DNA. When you improve your SMV, you are walking shit-tier DNA that is wearing the clothes of superior DNA.
You are essentially the most risky trap a woman can fall on, something that in caveman times would endanger her life, and more importantly, her lineage. Old aversions do not die, even though times have changed to the point where plenty of people with poor DNA are naturals and people with good DNA are losers. The loser who improves is odious to her subconscious not because he himself is repulsive or immoral, but because he actually threatens her biological function (to get the best genes she can get).
When you make it to the top, torch your past. Burn all your old pics, nuke your social media. Your climb means everything to you, but to women, it’s a “L” branded onto your forehead.
* If you want to get a real, possibly painful, introduction to your SMV, then take a job in a public environment with a steady stream of new college girls forced to interact with you. This happened to me about 3 years ago and its been brutal. All my life I had experienced the quick eye lock, look away maneuver from pretty girls. But when you work in a cubicle or construction site, you don’t have to own it everyday. Once it starts happening several times a day, you either change for the better, or wilt. Actually one of the best things that’s happened to me in several years.
