‘Weapons Of Mass Migration’

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* These events should just be called invasions.

Who cares if the invaders aren’t wearing uniforms or carrying guns? They are invading.

They are trespassing.

If someone were to come onto my property uninvited and refuse to leave, I would call the cops, and the trespassers would be removed under threat of force.

* No machine guns in Europe, no destroyers, no atomic bombs? What these foreigners do is irrelevant, this is totally the fault of the white-hating leftist/minority coalition in Western countries and the cucks who tolerate their existence.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on ‘Weapons Of Mass Migration’

Does Jonathan Franzen Belong On The Alt-Right?

Comments at the Chateau:

* Houellebecq, along with Tom Wolfe, are the greatest novelists of our age and, not coincidentally, they are also alt-right, neodark, reactoshivvian crimethinkers and sexual market surveyors of unparalleled keen perception.

The Left’s causes are exhausted, and their art reflects that. The Right’s causes have only just gathered strength, and their art is ascendant. Rebellion has always been a friend to expression.

* Franzen’s ‘Freedom’ is definitely a self-aware effort to extensively explore Evpsych’s cad-dad theories in literary form, and also contains some jabs at NPR-land and its Keillorite kapital in Minnesota.

IMO, ‘Freedom’ is largely successful in that exploration, though Franzen is far from being ‘one of us’ – at most, he’s a man of the Left who has become skeptical, is aware of the artistic power of Evpsych, and has some ability to insert our ideas esoterically into fiction that the reading classes will, well, read.

‘Purity,’ his most recent, is considerably less successful in this regard. It’s essentially gynocentric and progressive in its message, although it has its moments, and there is some good analysis of the cynicism of East German Marxism and the Left, and some tribute to the ability of alpha Game to thrive in any political environment (as it should, since archetype transcends ideology).

* Having studied literature in the leftist halls of academe, I cannot begin to describe how much Tom Wolfe is despised in those precincts. They consider him crass, and declasse.

But he is heir to the great novelistic tradition of Cervantes, Fielding, Dickens, and Trollope. At turns parodic yet penetratingly realistic, his work will be read long after lightweights like Toni Morrison are gathering dust.

I saw him once walking on streets of Manhattan –cape, white suit, fedora, dark shirt with upright color in the early 20th century tradition. The guys is a peacock in every sense.

* Tom Wolfe is absolutely brilliant, I’ve read all his work (multiple times), and the day that I learned he was shunned by academicians was the day I knew I wouldn’t be an academician.

N.B. He considers himself an heir to Zola and Balzac.

COMMENTS TO STEVE SAILER:

* My guess, re Franzen’s politics, is that he’s to the right of the current zeitgeist, but not necessarily a rightest in an absolute sense. A Reagan Democrat sort of guy. Freedom was pretty brutal to neocons and miners (one of the most right-leaning industries, by political donations) but also to environmentalists and NYC cat ladies on the left.

* The late John Updike was blithely unconcerned that many of the more literary members of Official Victim Groups feel oppressed by the fact that white men continue to make up a wildly disproportionate fraction of the most talented writers. Updike’s combination of overwhelming talent and well-adjusted Middle Americanness was particularly enraging to the rising powers.

The new generation, in contrast, has been acutely aware of being hated for who they are, with varying impacts: defiance in the case of Houellebecq, conflictedness and depression in the case of poor [David Foster] Wallace.

Updike worked really hard on The Coup, studying Africa for about a year before writing. Then he worked really hard on Rabbit Is Rich, taking approaching 3 years to write it.

After that, as he was in his 50s, he went to a book a year schedule and didn’t do anything that ambitious again.

Updike was quite convinced that he peaked in his later 40s and then went into steady decline, which he was oddly cheerful about. He didn’t try to stretch out the time between his books to keep up his quality level as he got older. He was kind of like Woody Allen, who peaked at about the same era in the late 1970s-early 1980s, and has stuck to a one movie per year schedule ever since. They had kind of a jock attitude that each year brings a new season and you rack up the best statistics you can, but you’re not going to get better as you get older.

* Franzen and Wallace were friends. With Franzen as the bitter, less-talented friend who relished Wallace’s death as a chance to step out of his shadow and claim the mantle of the Great American Writer of his Generation. Except nobody really cared while DFW is still revered.

* Though he denied it, it is clear from the recent biography that a lot of Updike’s writing was auto-biographical. After he remarried, his 2nd wife kept a much tighter rein on him. His more stable domestic life made him happier but probably a less interesting writer.

* One look at Houellebecq tells you he does not care. Up and coming writers writers, artists or journalists don’t dare say anything not politically correct about immigration, I expect they would be warned about the effect on their careers.

According to Martin van Creveld, France (and Germany) are far more open to anti feminist thought than the UK or US . Houellebecq like several others mentioned is basically an anti feminist writer.

* Like how Norwegian Knausgaard hates the Swedes, Frenchman Houellebecq resents the Anglo-Americans and their ideas such as feminism and free free market economics.

It’s a problem for patriots: how do you keep from annoying neighbors that you agree with over big issues just because they annoy you? One solution is to be big about it, but that takes some maturity. And the globalists can often easily manipulate patriots into snits over Freedom Fries and the like.

Posted in Literature, Tom Wolfe | Comments Off on Does Jonathan Franzen Belong On The Alt-Right?

‘Is throwing blacks off of planes and trains for being rowdy the next big thing?’

Steve Sailer sets the scene.

US-based Spirit Airlines accused of racism after throwing 6 black passengers off plane

Passengers of Spirit Airlines Flight 868 accused the company of racism after an altercation over a seat resulted in three black couples being escorted off of the plane at Los Angeles International Airport.
The confusion Monday night started after the passengers claimed the seat was double-booked. After a white flight attendant accused a member of the group of being a threat, the police came and took the six people off of the plane, witnesses told CBS Los Angeles.

“I’m really humiliated just for the simple fact that you hear about this type of stuff happening in America, discrimination issues and stuff like that, but to actually experience it first-hand,” Alexandria Wright, one of the six passengers in the center of the controversy, told the channel.

“It was more than just us having the conversation. Why is that six black people got kicked off the plane?” Wright asked.

Group of black women kicked off Napa wine train after laughing too loud

The 11 women, all members of the same book club, boarded the Napa Valley Wine Train, excited to sip wine in a historic rail car with the scenic northern California vineyards as a backdrop.

One book club member, Lisa Renee Johnson, shared a video on Facebook.

“We made it, y’all,” she said on the video Saturday morning, beaming as her friends waved in the background. “Look at us. We are getting ready to get on the wine train.”

Johnson continued to chronicle the experience through photographs and videos, showing the members of Sistahs on the Reading Edge, many wearing matching black book club T-shirts, as they clinked wine glasses and ate appetizers.

Then two hours in, the train ride turned sour for the book club from Antioch, Calif.

WOW! They paraded us through 6 cars and none of us are even drunk…the police were waiting?

Posted by Lisa Renee Johnson on Sábado, 22 de agosto de 2015

Another passenger scolded the women, saying, “This is not a bar,” according to Johnson’s Facebook page.

Train workers told the women that they had to leave because they were too loud. About 1 p.m., they were met by police officers and given a bus ride back to the station.

Johnson blames racial bias — all but one of the book club members on the train are African American. The hashtag #laughingwhileblack, which Johnson used on her Facebook page, has taken off on social media, with many vowing to boycott the wine train.

“We sipped wine, enjoyed each other’s company but our trip is being cut short,” Johnson wrote. “If we all laugh at the same time it’s loud!”

According to train officials, the women’s laughter had prompted complaints, and workers asked them three times to quiet down.

“It wasn’t an issue of bias,” train spokesman Sam Singer said, adding that conflicts involving overly boisterous passengers occur about once a month. “It was an issue of noise.”

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on ‘Is throwing blacks off of planes and trains for being rowdy the next big thing?’

Wedding video – Bas Kol – בס-קול חיים שלמה מאיעס

Posted in Hasidim | Comments Off on Wedding video – Bas Kol – בס-קול חיים שלמה מאיעס

Whites In Decline

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The self-extermination of whites via depression and demoralization will continue until morale improves.

* And to think, 50 years ago our best minds were certain that men really wanted out of those horrible factory jobs, so they could pursue self-actualizing dreams instead. You know, write a book, or something.

Truth is, most of us didn’t know what to do with ourselves in the absence of really obvious gifts or ambition. A factory job, a mill job, an office job…whatevs.

* As a society, as a civilization we used to celebrate accomplishments and achievements. Now we celebrate the growing acceptance of degenerate forms of human behavior.

In the past it was the first men in the air; the first man to break the sound barrier; the first man to run the four minute mile; the first man on the moon etc. Now it is the first openly gay person on TV, the first gay kiss, the first “out” athlete in whatever sport; the first transgendered person on the cover of some magazine. The benchmarks by which we now measure our progress are completely inverted from the customary mode by which any previous civilization measured its ascent.

I believe this to be the fundamental difference between the old America and the new America. So the above priorities don’t surprise me in the least.

* I am wondering what the spin is going to be when one of these transgender “girls” sexually assaults a female classmate in the girls’ locker room. It seems inevitable that it’s eventually going to happen.

A mature adult who has had to struggle with the issue for years is one thing. A transgender person who’s willing to pay a significant social cost for being transgender, I can believe. But having once been a heterosexual teenage boy, it seems perfectly plausible to me that a troubled heterosexual teenage boy with a low sexual market value might embrace the chance to go ogle naked girls in the shower just by claiming he “feels like a girl.” If he’s already a nobody, what’s he got to lose by pretending to be even more of a weirdo? From his perspective, there’s just very little cost to saying “I’m really a girl” just to get in the girls’ locker room.

I feel like I’m watching a car crash in slow-motion, and we’re at the part where we can see the crash is unavoidable but there’s no way to step in and stop it from happening.

I guess when it eventually happens, we’ll get some variation of the “well, it would have been just as wrong if it were committed by a cisgender girl” argument. As if the whole episode was just one of those “whaddya gonna do” things that nobody could have possibly foreseen.

You know society is doomed when you have to expend intellectual energy defending the basic principles that prior generations just took as common sense.

* Steve, when are you going to break your silence on THE COYWOLF?

* Haven’t I written about it multiple times over the years? It comes up in “Race Does Not Exist” discussions because here we have not races but legally recognized separate species (wolves have typically been protected by the Endangered Species Act), but the boundaries between the species are fuzzy. You could apply the same standards used to say race does not exist to dogs/coyotes/wolves to say that species don’t exist. But species do exist, although it’s difficult to come up with an all purpose definition.

* Say what you like about Eric Fromm and his Frankfurt School affiliations, but he, at any rate, like the Early Marx and Veblen, stressed the point about how humans need to be productive in their daily endeavors.

By “productive” Fromm, Veblen and Marx meant only that we engage in some-what meaningful work. This work didn’t need to be earthshakingly original or daring, just socially useful and personally rewarding. Of course, they recognized that “personally rewarding” varies with the individual’s capacities and their inherent strengths and weaknesses.

The alternative, Fromm maintained, was a sense of meaninglessness, concomitant anger and destructiveness.

Additionally, Fromm (from insight derived through years of listening to people air their grievances and gripes) came to understand that people need a meaningful “frame of reference” that lent their lives some transcendental order and sense of rightness. “Transcendental” doesn’t necessarily imply a particular organized religion along with its pantheon of hoary gods but it does imply that people need to feel as though they belong to some larger coherent Gestalt in which their lives unfold, interaction with which gives their lives some sense of purpose and value.

We see today the dissolution of society’s answer to both of these essential needs and the tragic consequences. Looking at the unemployment rates among both uneducated, young blacks and middle-aged white workers and it becomes obvious that our society is falling apart. Leading unproductive lives results in their feelings of worthlessness and purposelessness. According to their genetic predispositions the one revenges itself by taking out their anger on society (with innocent “random” whites in particular suffering the brutal consequences of their selfish rage) and the other responds through self-destructive behavior. That this should be surprising to any competent social scientist is itself surprising.

Additionally, the left’s assault on society’s root narratives and myths has deprived people of a transcendent, coherent frame of reference. Their heroes have been slandered and villainised and their cultural icons (statues) have been literally defaced, removed or toppled. Their yearly calendar of religious events has been erased. Memorials to criminal shysters such as MLKing as well as holocaust “museums” defile our sacred public places. The great insights and laws of our Founding Fathers are subjected to “deconstruction” by third-rate minds which have themselves, contributed nothing (comparatively) to the comfort and advancement of the human race. The marvelous inventions (by white men) that have raised the lives of billions of this planet’s people from grinding poverty are reviled as tools of oppression. Everything is topsy turvy as the left rejoices in proclaiming the second coming of a “brown world” and celebrates the elevation to rule of those who, hitherto, have demonstrated no particular talent in conceiving or erecting this mirage-like paradise on Earth–or even a fully functioning democratic, first-world economy.

What do these reformers have to offer except black-demogogue-preacher-revival-style “hope and change”? Certainly no long-term tangible prospects. Just handouts and the immediate gratification provided by reaction to or against an unresponsive Social Order; neither of which provides a productive life nor a meaningful larger frame of reference.

* Maybe there’s an insidious link between drugs and pernicious and cultural destructive ideas, both of which have been aggressively peddled to Western culture? Maybe Lyndon Larouche was on to something in his book Drugs, Inc., where he identifies these peddlers and exposes their ultimate goal.

* It will become increasingly difficult for aging European Americans to pay their medical deductible costs in a system that caters to the fastest growing, least productive segments of the population. Black and brown unwed mothers will get all their baby costs and emergency room visits paid for, while retired Smiths and Joneses who worked all their lives will have a hard time coming up with their share of a hernia operation, hip replacement, or dental care.

Greater and greater numbers of them will see declining real value in their monthly Social Security deposits, forcing them to make tradeoffs for necessities — and in many cases sell their homes in a declining market. (They won’t be able to afford their property taxes in cities that have to pay school personnel to babysit and feed all those brown babies.)

Their retirement investments or pensions will shrink or disappear as more and more states and municipalities go bust under the weight of supporting those same growing, unproductive groups. Their investment advisers will unwisely have them in a bubble. (Look around, you are in a bubble now. See the colorful soapy colors swirling around? Isn’t it beautiful as the DOW keeps rising…)

As they say, getting old sucks — but getting old in a declining civilization sucks even more.

* Trump just did a presser at Trump Tower in NYC. I listened to 75%. It’s great. He hasn’t backed down a bit on immigration, the wall, anchor babies, etc. When he was needled that “walls don’t work” he shot back, “look at Israel.” He’s listening to the drumbeats.

Whatever his flaws, whatever happens, we have to be grateful to him for performing the public service of destroying the taboo against mentioning illegals, anchor babies, and a wall. Without Trump it would be Rubio v. Bush.

* It becomes particularly toxic for whites who lack the ability to put into words what you have eloquently spelled out here, but still innately feel the topsy-turvy nature of the world today. Exacerbating the issue is that they feel inadequate to talk openly about it, for fear of being shamed or losing an argument with someone using words like ‘heteronormative’. Then there’s the shame associated with not defending yourself.

* It seems to me that for a whole bunch of reasons, the backbone of this country has been the vast percentage of this country that was white and not too far from average.

What’s going to happen when America’s vast percentage of white middle class and working class people are no longer a majority, can no longer afford to pay a majority of the taxes, no longer can be counted on to contribute the hours and money to local charities that they once did?

The problem isn’t just that whites are becoming a minority, it’s that they are finally finding themselves being affected and dragged down by the some of the same things that have affected other groups for years. Being white and not a screwup isn’t enough to guarantee a living wage job anymore. Being white and not a screwup isn’t enough to keep social problems like addiction and children who don’t know their fathers, etc. away from most white families door anymore.

I expect that the crime rate for whites will creep up and that we may see that whites start operating gangs or joining those of other groups in significant numbers.

We’ll see lots more whites with chronic problems, low incomes, etc. needing help instead of providing it. As a result, America will have a much higher percentage of needy people and a much lower percentage of workers who are net tax contributors.

As a group, it seems inevitable that whites will start to lose many of their distinctive positive traits and advantages in our society and become more like the various minority groups who historically have not done so well in our country.

I don’t think anybody’s thinking about this or prepared for it.

It’s all a recipe for disaster.

MORE COMMENTS:

* People who read the Book of Proverbs are less likely to put the non-obese of either sex on a pedestal; less likely to grovel to those who make suspiciously pleasant drugs available; less likely to give in to their selfish inclinations. Fewer people now read the Book of Proverbs than in previous years. Consequently, suicidal behaviors are up. That being said, both of my friends who committed suicide (early 80s, late 90s) were, as an earlier comenter said, in “the bottom quartile of attractiveness”, hard as they tried not to be (to brutally simplify – and I am allowed to be brutal about the facts, since I non-brutally pray for the poor guys nearly every day of my life – they were unmistakably in that bottom quartile, despite endless hours at the gym for one of them – well, a few hours, anyway… and for the other one, exhausting attempts at being an accomplished hipster folk singer, that sort of thing). I had moved away from the towns my friends lived in long before their suicides. When obesity rates triple, as they have in recent years, the bottom quarter of male attractiveness is, for those men (and for those lesbians) who idolize the comparative good of sexual pleasure with average or above average women, a very very bad place to be. I wish I had been there for my poor idolatrous friends to talk them out of their idolization problems. I would have explained to them that, with the exception of the morbidly obese, overweight women can be very pleasant sexual partners, within a loving committed relationship. Those who know that are at a lower risk for suicide, I kid you not. Also, and equally important (yes I understand statistics) pleasant drugs and violent dramatic gestures should be repulsive to people who other people care about, one just needs to discover, or rediscover, those people who care about you. Anyway, I too have read the Book of Proverbs and regret not being as true a friend as I should have been. If you don’t want to read the whole book, just pick a number from one to nine and read again and again the chapters ending in that number (1, 11, 21, 31; 2, 12, 22.; my favorites, 7, 17, 27).

* Pathetic. It’s ridiculous when people attribute minority dysfunction to societal factors. It’s just as sad to read all these comments blaming societal trends for the increase in white mortality.

Individuals decide their own fate. If you have a crappy job, work hard to get a better one. If you are overweight, get off the couch and run around the block instead of eating more Fritos. And for Christ’s sake, if you must indulge in an illegal intoxicant, go find yourself a weed dealer instead of smoking meth and popping OxyContin.

None of this stuff is easy (except for finding the weed dealer part). But, who said life was easy? The best things in life are those paid for in toil, sweat and diligence.

* Isn’t this something along the lines of what happened in Russia before Putin? I think Anatoly Karlin had a detailed post a while back indicating that Russia’s demographic problems have largely subsided in the Putin Era, one of the many reasons he has a 90% approval rating and our own elites are sometimes struggling to break 20%.

I’ve been saying for years we should send a delegation of American Notables to Moscow to offer Putin the American Throne. Betcha he’d solve our domestic problems double-quick since he’s had lots of experience handling parasitic Oligarch-types…

* Owing to Open Borders Perpetual Mass Third World Imminvasion and H-1B supplanting of White American workers, massive long-term White unemployment and the concomitant monotonous Megaphonist top-&-bottom-against-the-middle demonization of White Americans seem to be having their desired and intended effects.

Either that, or middle-aged Whites are just obeying Oprah’s exhortation to their old White Racist selves to just “hurry up and die.”

* This must be the “demographic pruning” that Oprah spoke of a few years ago.

* I think this is an artifact of the demographic changing (for people 45-54) that didn’t go to college. In 1999, this included people born in 1945. In 2013, it included people born in 1968.

People that go to college tend to be smarter. Smarter people have lower death rates. We’re probably seeing a change because more people are going to college. Those that don’t go to college aren’t as smart, and the death rate goes up.

In 1967 (1945+22), it wasn’t that big a deal to not have a college degree. In 1990 (1968+22) it was.

* You wonder if that’s a consequence of whites having better healthcare – people are often first exposed to such drugs for legitimate medical reasons. I’ve never used illegal narcotics, but my exposure to hydrocodone, supposedly fairly mild as prescription painkillers go, was enough to convince me of the lure of addiction. Whites with decent health insurance would be able to come up with enough excuses to be prescribed these often enough to start an addiction.

Another factor is that whites tend to have higher expectations of themselves than blacks or Hispanics do. If you’re black or Hispanic you be a mooch for the whole of your life. Expectations are low, and you’ve got plenty of company. Whites who manage not to succeed must feel pretty lonely, by comparison.

Another contributing factor must be the increase in divorce rates, and the rising number of people who reach middle age having never married at all. People are increasingly unwilling to remained hitched to a spouse who has fallen on hard times. Those who reach middle age unmarried must look around and find themselves at something of a dead end. Same goes with those who reach middle age and find themselves professionally unfulfilled.

And finally, the people at or near the bottom are those who benefit most from a “system” – a set of rules to follow that lead to greatest happiness. For the last 40-50 that system has been mocked, undermined, and destroyed. it is gone. There are no rules to follow to attain happiness. You find it on your own, or you don’t.

* Some possible factors for rising white mortality:

Easier access to hard core drugs thanks to increased Asian and Hispanic Immigration and travel (in my part of the world most Class A drugs come from China).

Increasing drug and alcohol use among females

Rural economic stagnation

Widening economic gap between rich and poor whites

White getting increasingly stressed out about economic problems, particularly paying mortgages and farm and business loans (white male farmers are among the most most likely people to commit suicide).

* The problem with the libertarian-style idea of letting these poor whites pass into oblivion because of their bad choices seems not only cruel but a little muddle-headed. Poor whites are the most openly antagonized group in the modern paradigm; the fact that as a group they are failing unto death is not an instance of meritocracy in action. People who can observe the failure of low class whites without any sense of horror are probably following their libertarian principles to the point of absurdity. (Libertarians, why weren’t low class whites failing so spectacularly in the 1950s, for example?)
Noblesse oblige, on the other hand, is a beautiful bit of humanity. Properly, noblesse oblige is not ordered to sustaining the lower classes as parasites forever living off of the higher classes. Rather, I think it is meant to give the low classes the best conditions for whatever limited kind of success they can achieve. Noblesse oblige, the high-minded guidance of the lower classes for the sake of the nation’s common good, is the debt that the innately gifted owe to the nation’s common blood.

* As marijuana becomes more accepted and legal, cartels are pushing heroin instead. Let’s say you’re a regular marijuana user. You go to your dealer and find he has no pot for sale. What do you do? You want a drug. You really really want a drug, but don’t know anyone else who sells. So you buy the heroin anyway even though you know all the warnings. Most drugs users, from pot to heroin or whatever, have the same mentality. If they don’t get their drug, they absolutely have got to substitute another.

I look upon this in a purely Darwinian fashion. People with addictive genes are simply being removed from the white gene pool. This benefits the remaining white society in general. My only regret is that blacks and Mexicans aren’t being culled so quickly as. Heroin use hasn’t really entered these populations to the same extent, but I have no doubt we’ll soon be seeing it hammer these populations hard in the next decade much like crack did the black population back in the 80s. If you thought gang violence was bad in the 80s, just wait until the black and Mexican heroin dealers start fighting over territory in 2016-2026. For all we know, the killing spiral in Baltimore may be a sign that it’s already starting.

* Those of European ancestry are genetically disposed to be empathetic towards a larger community, and have a high level of conscientiousness; things that leave them more prone to suicide and desultory living in the presence of the current propaganda campaign.

* Believe me, I know how they feel, those sick, pissed-off, disappointed, invisible, exploited, forgotten white Americans..

…as my health insurance deductible skyrockets to pay for black and brown parasites, just when I enter the age when I will need it most.

We don’t matter anymore.

This is why I am just maintaining the best life I can for my wife and myself until we die.

This is why I am glad we had no children, who would only suffer further degradation in a declining world.

To those unlucky people who will live in the future: Enjoy your dirty brown planet. I am glad I won’t be here with you.

Anyone who thinks this comment is extreme doesn’t have the frontal lobes to see what’s coming, or the good taste to see what has already disappeared.

* It’s amazing to me how few Americans understand the Social Security system. One of the greatest benefits from SS is the “spousal benefit.” A stay-at-home mom can earn 50% of her husband’s SS benefit because in the 1930s they recognized “housework” as a valuable contribution to society. Americans in that era got tired of seeing little old ladies living out their final years in poverty as widows. Many of today’s “working moms” will not earn a significantly larger SS benefit than they would have received as a spousal benefit, yet they pay all these payroll taxes, income taxes, commuting expenses, day care, fast food, industrial-processed groceries and have too many meals from a red-and-white-striped bucket. No wonder they are drinking themselves to death. That second paycheck isn’t free, in fact, for most families the second income is probably negative over the lifetime of the couple.

* Few if any commenters here or at the NY Times mentioned the negative — and often dramatic — changes that mass immigration has brought to our communities.

Thirty years ago my suburban town was made up mostly of people like me, young white adults striving to raise a family in a good atmosphere. The schools were great and there was a real sense of community. I felt I belonged; most importantly, I felt like I had “made it.”

Today, I go to the grocery store or to a restaurant and I’m alone, surrounded by foreigners who look, talk and act completely different from me. There are few young white couples with children; my generation of whites was the last to see this place as “home.”

We have literally been replaced. And we are supposed to be happy about it, because diversity.

* So a race of people can be demoralized by decades (not even centuries) of all-encompassing negative publicity, to the point where they, collectively start making awful and self-hating decisions?

Posted in America, Whites | Comments Off on Whites In Decline

Steve Sailer: Obama Is a Genetic Determinist When It Comes to Sports Talent

From Steve Sailer:

On GoTrackTownUSA, 3 time All-American female distance runner Alexi Pappas writes:

ALEXI PAPPAS: WHAT THE PRESIDENT SAID

By Alexi Pappas / TrackTown USA

EUGENE, Ore. – My family stood together in the small waiting room just outside the Oval Office, nervously smiling like a group of kids waiting their turn at the top of a waterslide. My brother Louis stood at the front of our pack, ready to walk in first – he had spent the past few years working on President Obama’s staff, and this was his last day on the job. The Oval Office door cracked open and laughter spilled out into the waiting room. The family ahead of us walked out, and there he was: the President of the United States, standing just a few feet away.

We shook his hand one by one. Louis introduced me as a professional runner from Eugene, Oregon. The President’s attention then focused directly on me. First, he told me about his visit to Hayward Field during his 2008 campaign. A wonderful place, we agreed. At that moment, Mr. Obama looked me directly in the eye. “You have a gift,” he said. “You were born with a body that was meant to run long distances, more than the average human.”

I was taken aback. Right away I knew what I wanted to say in response … but dare I risk embarrassing my brother and disagree with Mr. Obama? I started by thanking the President, and then I couldn’t help myself – I added that my performance in the sport is actually a result of hard work, motivation and support from my community.

This was not the answer the President wanted to hear.

“No, no,” he said, “Your body is able to flush out lactic acid better than the average person – running is what you were born to do.” Mr. Obama’s energy and tone were so confident and convincing that he could have told me the moon is really made out of cheese and I would have agreed with him. I nodded and thanked him. Besides, our five-minute meeting time was up. I left the Oval Office feeling very honored, but I also couldn’t stop thinking about what the President had said.

The idea that I was meant to run, that I was born with a special ability, felt like it subtracted from my own willpower and motivation to pursue something to the fullest and at the highest level.

A couple of Christmas-shopping seasons ago, the President was seen buying Sports Illustrated reporter David Epstein’s explicitly HBD book The Sports Gene. The Los Angeles Times reported:

But most of Obama’s choices lean more toward pure escapism.

“The Sports Gene: Inside the Science of Extraordinary Athletic Performance,” by Sports illustrated writer David Epstein, tries to dispel common myths about what makes athletes great.

Personally, I think that studying sports for patterns that are revealing about humanity in general, such as the roles played by nature and nurture, isn’t pure escapism.

COMMENTS TO STEVE SAILER:

* It’s funny how much more clearly people think about sports than about everything else. Like if someone said that the New England Patriots suffered from a lack of diversity people would laugh at them. But no matter how many accomplishments Silicon Valley has, they still would obviously be better with more blacks and women.

* A couple of years ago the New England Patriots actually conducted a drive with not a single black player on offense. I stuck out like a sore thumb. I wondered when was the last time that happened? Sometime in the sixties, I suspect.

* So has Obama ever suggested that his intelligence derives from his extremely high achieving black father and from his white mother’s highly intellectual family? And has he noted that it is likely significant that his brother is a physicist?

* Sailer: One of Obama’s rare op-eds was in 1994 about The Bell Curve.

My impression is that Obama’s life was turned around by acing the LSAT, which allowed him to apply to the law schools at just Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, with no safety schools. A fellow worked out the math a few years ago and figured that Obama scored at the 94th to 98th percentile on the LSAT, which sounds plausible.

His maternal grandfather’s brother Ralph Waldo Emerson Dunham was a Berkeley Ph.D. who worked for the federal government. My extremely vague impression is that he might have worked on testing and hiring for the feds, but I might be mistaken on that: I found some old academic papers citing work on selecting good employees by “Dunham” but that may have turned out to be a different Dunham.

Obama’s maternal grandmother’s sister was a professor of something like nutrition science, where I think she specialized in quantitative methods in research.

(His maternal grandparents were the less educated black sheep of their respective families.)

* Imagine George W saying to a young black male…..”Son, you were born to play basketball”, which would have been twisted into…”you were bred to play sports.”

* The 95th percentile would put his LSAT score somewhere around 167 and his IQ at around 130, which is plausible.

Obama doesn’t strike me as a quant, though, and he doesn’t seem to be particularly analytical. He seems to have more of a verbal intelligence to me.

* Obama has good verbal intelligence. His big feat is he can repeat what people tell him back to them more cogently than they said it in the first place, which is not easy. I imagine it’s one reason his family thought he’d do well in the diplomatic corps, where it’s very important to be able to accurately grasp and then summarize the messages that Washington and foreign capitals want to communicate with each other.

* Even more impressive, Obama’s mother was admitted to U. of Chicago at age 15. She didn’t accept, but would have been in the company of a lot of distinguished people: Jim Watson, Susan Sontag, Robert Silvers, George Steiner, Paul Samuelson.

* Obama is no genius. His two auto bio books are lame. His academic accomplishments are zero.

Obama is the not the great statesman. But he is a good teleprompter reader. His diplomatic initiatives are crap. His military initiatives are crap.

Obama was saved by the mafia who blackmailed John Roberts and served up two hollow men as campaign opponents, McCain and Romney.

* His fans make the mistake of describing him as some world-historical genius. He isn’t. But he’s not quite a dolt, either. He’s moderately intelligent, and has a number of personality flaws and ideological blind spots that work against his success. He’s low energy, and he doesn’t seem to be able to stay “on” for long stretches of time.

I think Steve has said in the past that Obama would have been a good Dean of Diversity at a moderately sized university. That’s about right, as long as the university campus was safe and Obama didn’t have to deal with misbehaving ghetto yutes. Basically, you don’t want the guy in any position where he’s responsible for outcomes that matter. President of the United States is not a good match for his strengths and weaknesses.

* As persons of non-color, it’s certainly very easy to look at stuff like this and get angry. And there is nothing inherently bad about getting upset with ethnocentric blacks and their white libtoid enablers. The problem comes when we expect a large majority of blacks to adopt our cultural and moral norms, and/or expect masochistic or [like in Rodham’s case] evil leftoids to stop enabling blacks’ worst behavior.

Instead of setting unrealistic expectations, we must learn to emulate the rank tribalism of blacks, at least until we can wrest political power back from them. As much as the compassionate side of me would like to believe that whites and blacks can live peacefully and prosperously together without white supremacy, I see very little evidence that this is the case. The last four years or so have demonstrated beyond any remotely reasonable doubt that the average black and the average white inhabit vastly different moral universes and will for the foreseeable future. We’re about Justice, they’re about Just Us.

* Just wanted to say a big thank you to ESPN for playing that “Same Love” commercial at every station break. If they hadn’t done that, why, I could easily have gone five, ten, or even twenty minutes without thinking what a wonderful thing homosexuality is… and that would be horrible.

Posted in Genetics, Sports | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Obama Is a Genetic Determinist When It Comes to Sports Talent

The White Guy Award

REPORT: So, let’s take a look at the past winners. Have they all fallen in line with Love’s “white guy” claim?

2013: Kevin Love (check)
2012: Kevin Love (check)
2011: Kevin Love (check)
2010: Luis Scola (check)
2009: Mehmet Okur (check)
2008: Bruce Bowen
2007: Steve Nash (check)
2006: Steve Nash (check)
2005: Brad Miller (check)
2004: Brian Cardinal (check)

Posted in Basketball, Whites | Comments Off on The White Guy Award

What’s the loneliest place in the world? The Puerto Rican Cultural Center.

* Jewish Friend: When my kids were little, I used to say “what’s the best day to go to the Bronx Zoo?”
Answer: During the Puerto Rican Day Parade.

* Jewish Friend: “You’re very racist today.”
Luke: “I wasn’t like this prior to converting to Orthodox Judaism. I’m the victim here.”
Friend: “Wow.”

* Three Jews have a friendly chat.
Democrat Jew: “Republicans couldn’t handle the CNBC moderators. A bunch of crybabies.”
Independent Jew: “Jews couldn’t handle Hitler. Bunch of crybabies.”
Republican Jew to Democrat Jew: “Go teach a class in how to stab a Jew.”

* My friend has a computer problem.
Luke: “Do we have any chinks around here?”
Friend: “Yeah, you.”

* I grew up in the Australian outback, birds singing, very quiet, no Jews around for a hundred miles.

* A Jew: “That Adventist ministry? Do people get anything out of it?”
Luke: “Yes, assurance of their heavenly salvation.”

* For a very reasonable price, I’m willing to come to your home and talk to your kids about the facts of life.

* This could have been me, but thank god Desmond was a strict father.

* My new book is called “How To Make Love Like A Seventh-Day Adventist Preacher!”

* I told an Orthodox Jew that my new book is called “How to **** Like a Seventh-Day Adventist!” He said: “Probably too G-rated for me.”

* A Jew just yelled at me: “The Vatican’s laundering money!”
Phew.

* Some vendors, when they see a Jew coming, it seems like they double their prices. What did your tradition teach you to do when you see a Jew coming?

* Friend: “My life is so boring compared to yours.”
Luke: “I just didn’t know how to leverage that work experience.”
Friend: “How about over a desk?”

* My friend says a couple of these chairs could take my love life to the next level.

* I find it hard to join a group without immediately scheming how to take it over.

* I walk around yearning for the world to acclaim me for traits and accomplishments I don’t have. So it is very important for me to convince you about the wonders of my false self though the fear of being found out is horrifying.

* I like to start my day smoking a big blatt of gemara.

* Friend: “Can’t you go home?”
Luke: “I got a meeting.”
Friend: “It’s raining. Go home.”
Luke: “I got a disease. It’s like cancer.”

* ABC: FIGHT OVER LAST PIECE OF CHICKEN ENDS IN FATAL STABBING AT HOUSTON APARTMENT

HOUSTON — A fight over dinner has left one man dead, and another man charged with his murder.

At about 11:30 p.m. Friday, police say five men were fixing dinner and drinking in an apartment in the 1400 block of Lakeside Estates. Reinaldo Cardoso Rivera, 38, reportedly became angry when Darwin Perez Gonzalez, 34, took the last piece of chicken.

Police say the argument escalated into a fist fight in the parking lot, where Rivera allegedly stabbed Gonzalez and took off with a knife. Gonzalez died at the scene.

Rivera later returned to the scene and admitted to officers he stabbed Gonzalez. He was taken into custody and charged with murder. Officers say they recovered a kitchen knife in Rivera’s possession.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on What’s the loneliest place in the world? The Puerto Rican Cultural Center.

High IQ Communities

The highest IQ society in history was probably the ancient Greeks around the time of Plato (average of 120 is one guess). Many Ashkenazi communities today would average 120. The average IQ of a Modern Orthodox shul is probably close to 120 with an average household income in America of $120,000.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on High IQ Communities

Gives new meaning to the term ‘Drill sergeant’

I am really glad that we now make it easier for gays to serve in the military.

Just what every straight guy wants in the trenches and the barracks and the showers — a little anal rape.

It was nice to have parts of life that were as desexualized as possible. Now we keep amping up the sexual frustration. More sexual freedom equals more sexual frustration. If you put straight guys in the showers and the barracks and alone in the bushes with young women, they’d be sexually frustrated and rapey as well.

Washington Times:

Far more military men are being raped by other men than is reported by the Pentagon because of the stigma attached to such sexual assaults, says a new study by the American Psychological Association.

“Rates of military sexual trauma among men who served in the military may be as much as 15 times higher than has been previously reported, largely because of barriers associated with stigma, beliefs in myths about male rape, and feelings of helplessness,” the APA said in releasing its findings Tuesday.

The Defense Department issues a biannual report on sexual assaults. Based on Internet emailed surveys it found that more men than women, in pure numbers, are sexually assault victims. Women make up about 14.5 percent of the 1.4 million active force.

“We know that there is under reporting among men and women and hope that this special issue will help to bring awareness and treatment for those that serve and protect us,” said the issue’s co-editor, Michi Fu, a clinical practitioner. “I personally wanted to pull together scholarship after hearing of reports of military sexual trauma being so much more prevalent than in the general population.”

Researchers said that even though the Pentagon survey, done most recently by the Rand Corps, is anonymous, men still are reluctant to disclose they were raped. The APA came to this conclusion by surveying a random group of 180 combat veterans, which led them to believe that the sexual assault rate is 15 times higher.

The rapes come at a cost to the men and the nation according to another survey of 2,042 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Posted in Armed Forces, Rape | Comments Off on Gives new meaning to the term ‘Drill sergeant’