How Do We Resist Illegal Immigrants

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* 1. We start by saying that we will never return someone who has fled for their life from their home country to their home country. It would be inhumane.
2. We make an agreement with a country such as North Korea or the Democratic Republic of Congo, or Sudan to take the refugees. They will be paid $1000 for every year that the refugee remains in the country.
3. Every refugee who arrives will have their application automatically accepted and be immediately shipped to the country from step 2.
4. If any refugee has troubles leaving their country of refuge, we will file protests through official channels with the country from step 2 while holding firmly to our no bribery policy.

* What I hear is Australia is becoming Asian very fast via legal immigration. Asians from India, China, Burma, Thailand, Vietnam, every place in Asia but not as many from Muslim nations such as Afghanistan. Most have to pass skills tests? English proficiency? The best thing than can be said is that Australia is allowing in educated Asians while we are the dumping ground for Mexico, Central America and the 3rd world.

I read some Australian propaganda that they must allow in so many Asians to keep ahead technologically. A very high number of Chinese go to university there (similar to the American situation) and how many will return home?

* In Australia there is a large, influential and very noisy leftist minority who are adamantly opposed to the current successful policy that has entirely stopped “irregular maritime arrivals” (to use the official phrase).

The new Prime Minister (Turnbull) tends to share the views of that minority, at least on social issues, notwithstanding he is in (and now leads) a centre-right party (called the Liberal Party, just to confuse our American friends).

Turnbull would most likely restore the status quo ante if he had enough freedom to do so, but he would risk an immediate and violent backlash from his party – and from the majority of the electorate – if he tried it. My money is on his self-interest trumping his heartfelt wish to show all his friends at Eastern Suburbs (of Sydney) dinner parties what a goodwhite he is.

* We have roughly a century of stockpiled firepower, and defense comes down to being willing to use that. A wall or fence is no good if we won’t defend it, the law meaningless if we won’t enforce it. If instead our people are really determined to give their nation away, it really doesn’t matter what the plans are for that. I suppose education about the camp of the saints, and demographics and what they really mean would prove useful, but that is too racist to work.

* The system understands only one language – violence. The rioters of Ferguson were correct and their critics are victims. If you meekly allow yourselves to be robbed, well then you’re going to be robbed. This is the iron way of the world and always has been. Modern justice and democracy are shams that conceal that reality. Any white who doesn’t regard liberals in the same way that inmates in Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia regarded their camp guards is a cuck.

* There’s nothing “subtle” about Camp of the Saints flash mobs, so the prophylactic against them cannot be subtle, so it must be absolute: Zero Tolerance. What’s needed is a fifty years long total ban on all immigration.

Bear in mind that no disincentive can work until the sacred cow of Multiculturalism-Diversity as the All-Highest Good will have been exposed, slain, butchered, and incinerated to ashes.

* Americans need to stop being so damn welcoming and friendly to migrants. Some few will genuinely appreciate it and respond in kind. Most will regard it as what it is–a kindness that so readily shades off into weakness. Just altering one’s demeanor, smiling less often and less widely, making less effort to understand mangled English, making no effort to understand any other language–these all have a cooling effect on foreigners. Even the illiterate ones have gotten the memo–Americans are suckers. No need to be rude but any glad-handing should be avoided. NAMS are especially thin-skinned. They also tend to be bullies and you can almost always bully a bully. Formal and not friendly tends to cause them to back away, if not down completely. Migrants who don’t feel welcome are far less likely to tell their families back home to “Come on in, the water’s fine!”

I base these suggestions on my years spent interacting daily with foreigners from all over the world while living in a college town.

* 1. Elect Trump. In the meantime, make it clear to the world that you support Trump. He is hard line, everyone knows it, and he can move the Overton Window.

2. As others have suggested, set a concrete limit on the total number of immigrants that will be allowed into the US per year. Make it known that “migrants” and “refugees” will count as part of that number, thus reducing visas and opportunities for everyone else’s favorite race or interest group.

3. Also as others have suggested, establish one finite budget for assistance to both migrants and Americans. Make it clear to everyone that migrants will be taking from this budget, thus reducing benefits for every other moocher here.

I can imagine points 2 and 3 as parts of a Trump position statement on his website.

4. Set up a processing area somewhere like northern Alaska. It’s cold up there, and all these scumbags who want to invade European Man’s living space come from warm latitudes (big surprise). Let the world and social media know that we have this place ready, and that everyone will be stuck there for a long time while we inefficiently clear them.

5. Make sure they know that a lot of them will be permanently located up there somewhere, where we can say they will have the opportunity to work and make their homes — in northern Alaska, or North Dakota, or the most remote areas of Wyoming (cold and windy.)

6. (Most subtle and tricky of all) subversively facilitate a healthy dislike for the migrant group and it’s ethnicities. I somehow believe smarter people than me can find ways of making this happen. Make it agitprop or psyop or something. It is perfectly okay not to like people. Let’s start now. Get your Hollywood friends to make them villians in movies and TV shows. Produce Borat 2 and make him a terrorist.

7. Publicize images of the mass of “migrants” as they truly are: aggressive mobs of men. STOP PUTTING BABY PICTURES ON EVERY STORY.

* You’d have to act through civil disobedience–violent acts can be easily targeted by the FBI (and rightly so, violence is violence), but clerks refusing to endorse in-state tuition for illegals a la Kim Davis, massive protests and boycotts against employers using illegal labor, and any other ideas I am not clever enough to come up with. Even if they don’t want to enforce immigration violations, if you deluge DHS with (true!) reports of illegal activity someone else can ask why they have all these reports of illegal activity they’re ignoring, and run an expose. Don’t talk about what you would do if you had the levers of power you don’t have (PSAs, building walls, etc.–a wall would work but it will never be built). Work with the levers of power you do. It’s what the Tea Party does.

I saw Gamergate make the feminists blink. Many Americans from both parties are on our side. Let’s see what we can do.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on How Do We Resist Illegal Immigrants

Scott Walker’s Wife Is 12 Years Older

Comment: “I learned that Scott Walker is married to an older woman. A MUCH older woman. His wife, “Tonette”, is a certifiable old hag. He married her when he was 26, she was 38. What a pitiable man he is. When you’re 26, you can bang a 38 on a lark and laugh about it with your buddies the next day, but you don’t marry it.

When I saw her picture, any shred of respect I had for the governor immediately evaporated.

He’s a first-rate loser.”

* “I hear your wife is a lovely woman.”
Did anyone else pick up on how subtly Trump called Jeb’s wife a whore? The man is slick…

Posted in Politics | Comments Off on Scott Walker’s Wife Is 12 Years Older

Girly Boys At National Review Upset With Ann Coulter

David French writes: In condemning pandering, Coulter is using language that appeals to a microscopic slice of the Twitterverse that is obsessed with the notion that the GOP is full of so-called “cuckservatives” (short for “cuckolded conservative”). Who is a cuckservative? Someone like this:

The cuckservative feels very passionate about issues like abortion, which rarely directly affects his own life. In fact, you might often hear a cuckservative talking about how abortion is “racist” since blacks and mestizos overwhelmingly get more abortions that whites.

On the other hand, the cuckservative feels uncomfortable about issues like immigration. If the cuckservative is not an outright open-borders shill, he will only give lip service about “securing the border” or “opposing illegal but favoring legal immigration” but he will never talk about immigration very much. After all, immigration has very serious implications for Western Civilization, so it doesn’t concern the cuckservative.

And:

The cuckservative is often fanatically in favor of transracial adoption. He sees it as some divine calling. In a sense, this is cuckoldry at its essence, since these whites are usually forgoing their own inclusive fitness to adopt someone from another race. As Heartiste notes, they’re race-cucking their own families.

“Race-cucking their own families.” That’s next-level strange. Then there’s this:

The cuckservative, although never Jewish, often seems vicariously to live through Israel. Since the cuckservative feels that he cannot defend his own ethnic interests, he’ll defend Israel’s. The cuckservative cares more about Israel’s borders than his own. Israel adamantly defends its own ethnic interests and perhaps deep down the cuckservative respects this on some unconscious level.

So, what does Coulter tweet all night? Snide comments about GOP obsessions with abortion, insufficient attention to immigration (especially as compared to support for Israel’s border fence — a “cuckservative” world talking point), and obsession with Israel. In short, she’s pandering — pandering to a very small, very angry crowd that’s far more white nationalist than it is recognizably conservative.

Posted in Ann Coulter | Comments Off on Girly Boys At National Review Upset With Ann Coulter

How Deep Is The Poz?

From Chateau Heartiste: For new readers: “poz” is shorthand for the propagation of culture degeneracy, filth, freakishness, and antipathy toward normal, psychologically healthy humans. The epithet is retrofitted from its original use in the gayfag “bug chaser” sewer, where poz is a term of endearment for HIV positive gay men.

The poz is everywhere in America, but just how deep does it go? We turn our attention to the top five films hailed as “masterpieces” at this year’s Toronto International Film Festival. Synopses of each movie follow.

The Danish Girl – Set in the 1920s, a M2F tranny freak lops off his penis to become a woman. His wife supports him and takes photos of him in erotic poses.

About Ray – Three generations of single moms, bitchy lesbians, and proud sluts create a huge cunty hug box to help guide a F2M tranny freak teen girl through her testosterone therapy and tit chopping surgery.

Freeheld – Brave lesbian cop, compassionate gay rights activist, homophobic county officials, transformations, and payment transfers.

Truth – Historical revisionism recasting Dan Rather as noble truth-teller instead of as the lying, pathologically partisan shitlib in self-denial that he is and always will be.

Spotlight – Hagiography of Boston Globe shitlib journos who reported on child abuse scandal in the Catholic Church. Not mentioned: over-representation of homosexual deviance in the ranks of the priesthood, Bryan Singer’s Hollywood boylove pool parties.

To answer this post title’s question: The poz goes very, very deep. If your girlfriend asks you to accompany her to one of these fruity, implicitly (and sometimes blatantly) anti-straight white man flics, tell her no way. If she insists, tell her you think less of her for wanting to indulge this garbage.

Posted in Homosexuality, Trans | Comments Off on How Deep Is The Poz?

After Diversity

From Chateau Heartiste: Diversity™ erodes the nation-state through invidious psy op mechanisms. You are soothed into a comfort bubble of warm altruistic feels, and then one day you wake up to find yourself robbed blind and left in the street half-naked, with no home to go to for respite from the storm.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on After Diversity

Donald Trump Needs To Move To The Comfort Phase Of His Seduction Of The American Voter

From Chateau Heartiste: Under the classic Game model of picking up girls, Trump has passed through all three stages of the Attraction phase of his seduction of the American voter.

– He has approached the people and opened them.
– He has created attraction and demonstrated his high(er) value to the people through a mix of effective game techniques (anchors, reframes, cocky/funny, body language, AMOGing, push-pull, and storytelling).
– He has forced the other candidates to qualify themselves to him and has refused to comply with the hoops thrown at him by the antagonistic media.

Trump’s Game has been masterful so far. The people are intrigued. Mass Vaginal Tingles (MVT) rocket through the electorate. But this is not enough. It’s one thing to arouse the people to curiosity; it’s quite another to take the people home and bang them silly.

Trump needs to move on now to the Comfort/Trust Phase of his seduction of the American voter. It’s time for him to:

– Build rapport with the people. The Game is played in rapport. This is where Trump must elicit the electorate’s values, mirror those values back to them, and capture and lead their imagination.
– Build an emotional connection with the people. Trump must tap into the deepest fears and hopes and desires of the people and have them believe he is the one who “gets them”.
– Get intimate with the people. At this stage, Trump is speaking past the media gatekeepers directly to the voters, and moving them into position for the final seduction and relinquishment.

The Comfort Phase of Trump’s seduction of the American voter means he has to start spelling out his policy proposals (values) and winning the voters over with promises of something deeper and more intimate than bombastic displays of his alpha sexiness. It shouldn’t be too hard, but it will require some more patience and temperance from him. He’ll have to spend time learning at least cursory details of policies (women) that may otherwise not interest him.

It’s time to “get real” with the people and kiss some babies (women). When he has earned their trust, he will be able to move this glorious love affair to his bedroom for the finishing move — the presidency.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Donald Trump Needs To Move To The Comfort Phase Of His Seduction Of The American Voter

Jezebel Essay: Why I Quit My Dream Newspaper Job After Four Months

I challenge you to try to finish this whine by Devon Maloney. Or you could just look at her picture and get the same idea.

devon maloney

Of course, there were red flags: that nine-month interview process, for one; the fact that one of the oldest, most tumultuous journalistic bureaucracies in the nation hired a twenty-something female editor to manage an all-male, all-older and nearly all-white team should’ve been another.

Posted in Feminism | Comments Off on Jezebel Essay: Why I Quit My Dream Newspaper Job After Four Months

Nuclear Contamination At Brandeis-Bardin Institute

I heard a KNBC TV reporter say on Take Two today that Brandeis Bardin has radiation contamination, that he went to the Jewish camp, that he recently contacted the Jewish institution, they said they had tested everything and it was safe, the reporter asked to see the tests and the camp refused. Thousands of Jewish kids over decades went to a camp with severe contamination.

From the Los Angeles Times in 1997:

SIMI VALLEY — On the eve of a trial that would have questioned whether ground-water pollution resulted from decades of radioactive and chemical testing at Rocketdyne’s Santa Susana Field Lab, the aerospace firm Thursday quietly settled a lawsuit filed against it by the Brandeis-Bardin Institute.

Brandeis-Bardin had accused Rocketdyne of letting its research into rocket engines and nuclear reactors foul the ground water, which ran downhill to the neighboring Jewish studies center in eastern Simi Valley, the suit said.

Jury selection in U.S. District Court was to have begun Tuesday before Judge Audrey B. Collins.

But the institute and the aerospace contractor resolved their differences first in a secret agreement Thursday, said Helen Zukin, attorney for Brandeis-Bardin.

“It was a fair and reasonable settlement from the Brandeis-Bardin Institute’s perspective,” Zukin said. “It is subject to a confidentiality agreement. I can give you no details.”

Rocketdyne spokeswoman Lorie Circle said Thursday evening that she was unable to confirm the suit had been settled.

Brandeis-Bardin filed the federal lawsuit just before Christmas 1995, alleging decades of nuclear and chemical research at Rocketdyne’s field lab had polluted the institute’s water and land.

Despite heavy work on Rocketdyne’s part to clean up the toxic legacy of its work, studies found that chemical and radiological contaminants had seeped onto the Brandeis-Bardin property, the suit said.

Low-level traces of radioactive material and carcinogenic solvents such as trichloroethylene were found near the border separating Rocketdyne from Brandeis-Bardin, far from the main activities of the institute, the studies said.

Yet while no one at Brandeis-Bardin ever uses the ground water, the suit alleged the contamination would lower the value of the property–should the institute ever decide to sell any of its 3,100 acres.

The institute moved from New York to its current site southeast of the field lab in 1947–about the same time rocket research began on “the Hill,” and several years before Atomic Energy Commission scientists began experimenting with nuclear reactors at Rocketdyne.

Rocketdyne designed, built and tested nearly every engine used in the U.S. space race against the former Soviet Union, and still tests satellite-carrying rockets.

The firm also worked with the energy commission from the late 1940s to the early 1960s, operating 16 experimental nuclear reactors–one of which suffered a partial meltdown.

Boeing bought the 2,668-acre field lab from Rocketdyne’s parent company Rockwell International in December, agreeing to assume nearly all the responsibility and legal liability for cleaning up the lab site.

But Boeing has left its Rocketdyne division alone to face any liability for the July 1994 blast that killed two physicists who were illegally blowing up rocket fuel chemicals to get rid of them.

Rockwell pleaded guilty last spring to felony charges of illegal waste disposal and paid a record $6.5-million federal fine in the deaths of physicists Otto K. Heiney and Larry A. Pugh.

And federal prosecutors are preparing to file criminal charges against other Rocketdyne workers in the men’s deaths, sources have told The Times.

Posted in Brandeis University | Comments Off on Nuclear Contamination At Brandeis-Bardin Institute

Steve Sailer: What Plans Should America Have Ready to Stymie a Camp of the Saints Here?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I think this Australian idea of paying Cambodia to take boat people a superb idea. Win-win.

If the boaters are that desperate they should be happy, Cambodia makes money. Would be migrants get sent a terrific message.

This is absolutely what Europe should do. Push them back into holding area in North Africa. It would be expensive but less than the total future costs of taking them in. Of course it has to be done with panache.

Bribery is an under appreciated force for good in world affairs; carefully done. If the price is right some country would act as a holding cum education centre south of the US border. What about paying Mexico to send them there before they reach the border? Combine this with a watered down Marshall program for propaganda affect.

(Of course everywhere in the West are Open Borders crowds that jam sensible solutions but who don’t seem to have as much traction in Oz.)

* France has a good idea to keep refugees away, over whelming bureaucracy staffed by indifferent workers so & stingy benefits. Of course with a socialist in charge that might quickly change.

One thing of note in the article is how social media guides the decisions of migrants. When a country gains a rep of being generous word gets out quickly.

* John O’Sullivan says the new guy in Australia wouldn’t have solved the boat problem if he’d been in instead of Abbott; but he probably won’t go out of his way to actively break what his predecessor fixed.

On the other hand, a lot of things require not just maintenance to keep going but high level enthusiasm.

* Here’s a suggestion which could help solve both the immigration problem and the budget deficit. Currently many if not most of our welfare programs are treated as entitlements. That means that if the number of food stamp recipients double, then so does the amount the government spends on food stamps. Welfare programs are treated like a supposedly bottomless pit of money.

Instead, we should budget a specific amount of money for welfare benefits. If the number of people who qualify for a program goes up, then the value of the benefit for each family or individual goes down. That will incentivize poor voters to want to keep large numbers of other poor people from entering the country.

Another option would be to create a separate income tax for welfare (and perhaps for every government department). Have it apply to every last penny of income, including capital gains, with no deductions. When the number of people using welfare goes up, so do everyone’s taxes. When the value of welfare benefits go up, so do everyone’s taxes.

Our current income tax system is far too opaque, and effectively hides the cost of individual government programs from the taxpayers.

* Send ‘me all to Liberia and Sierra Leone. That’s what those places are for.

Posted in Australia, Immigration | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: What Plans Should America Have Ready to Stymie a Camp of the Saints Here?

Steve Sailer: Q. Is Obama a Muslim? A. He Was Raised to be a Muslimist

Steve Sailer writes: The President of the United States has long claimed to be a believing Christian. For many years, he trumpeted his decades of theological tutelage under his spiritual adviser Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Rev. Wright has made clear that, although he was a Muslim for a while, he espouses “Black Liberation Theology.”

Before finding Rev. Wright, Obama was, according to his Dreams from My Father, a regular reader of the Nation of Islam newspaper The Final Call. But the failure of Rev. Farrakhan’s “POWER” attempt to launch a blacks-only brand of toothpaste and other toiletries convinced Obama there wasn’t enough money in black economic nationalism.

But some people remain skeptical, citing Obama’s formative years in Muslim Indonesia.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Obama is not a Muslim. He reminds me of every other liberal I’ve ever met in my life. That means he’s atheist/agnostic, but favors Islam over Christianity because he favors whatever is seen as Eastern/Brown as opposed to Western/White.

It’s absolutely bizarre, but expected, to watch the media demand that Republicans serve as witnesses to his Christian faith.

* When Barry made his bizarre turn to Chicago in 1985, he had decided to become a professional black man. Not a black professional man, but a professional black-man. To do this, he needed to join a black church.

If blacks were all Mormons, he would have joined a Mormon temple.

The man has no religion. Imagine.

* Keep in mind that Barack Hussein Obama not only carries his father’s name (abjuring “Barry,” which he was once called, for “Barack”), but he called his “autobiography” “Dreams from My Father” despite the fact that his father was out of his life after a couple of months and he had very little contact with him, being raised by his white mother and white grandparents. He didn’t become a Christian until he joined Rev. Wright’s church sometime in the late 80′s, by his own admission. Both his father and step-father were Muslims. So, for some reason, his father played a much greater role on Obama’s life than the facts would justify, and he has more reason to favor Islam over Christianity than what you suggest. There was also that incident when he was being interviewed by a prominent newsman and inadvertently referred to his Islamic faith only to be corrected by the newsman that he meant his Christian faith and Obama quickly said he meant to say his Christian faith. I have never made such a slip-up in my life, and I doubt anybody who was raised a Christian ever made such a verbal slip. (BTW I was raised a Christian, but have been a nonbeliever since I was 13 or 14, despite being dragged to church every Sunday until I graduated from high school and went away to college.) I don’t subscribe to the conspiracy theories that Obama is a “secret Muslim,” but the record is less clear than his most ardent supporters insist.

* Obama strikes me as basically secular, but will spout a gilded veneer sort of a mix of leftist black Christianity and non-fundamentalist Islam for political purposes.

Since Trump is begging this whole discussion (ironically, by not saying anything), notice how quasi-religious Trump is getting.

* At this point is there really any reason left to doubt that Obama has zero respect for Christianity? He takes every opportunity to criticize Christianity for ancient sins while forgiving Islam for both current and past sins.

SFAIK, since leaving the Reverend Wright’s “church” and becoming president he has yet to join any other religious congregation. If he hasn’t done so this late in his presidency, then he never will again.

Speaking of which, when’s the last time Bill and Hillary and Chelsea attended church for anything other than political campaigning? After Bill was defeated for re-election for governor back in the late 70s, he and Hillary took up attending a big church in Little Rock which broadcast its meetings. They sat on the front row every Sunday, where everyone watching the church on the teevee could get a good glimpse of them.

Posted in Barack Obama, Islam | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Q. Is Obama a Muslim? A. He Was Raised to be a Muslimist