Rich Lowry: Heed Trump’s Warning

Rich Lowry writes: One of Donald Trump’s political skills is giving widely condemned speeches.
His post-Orlando jeremiad fit the pattern, but the speech was a little like Wagner’s music as described in the famous Mark Twain line: Not as bad as it sounds. There is something so inherently inflammatory in Trump’s delivery that he could read the Gettysburg Address and some listeners would wonder how he could possibly say such a thing.

The kernel of Trump’s speech was rather obvious: “The bottom line is that the only reason the killer was in America in the first place was because we allowed his family to come here. That is a fact, and it’s a fact we need to talk about.”
The reaction of much of the opinion elite was nearly instantaneous: Whatever we do, let’s not talk about that fact.
Countless articles have been written on how much better we are at assimilating Muslim immigrants than Europe is, usually with a heavy element of back-patting over our openness and fluidity as a society in contrast to the self-defeating insularity of a country like France.
This may well be true, but the assumption that we have the magic formula is, at the very least, under stress now that we’ve repeatedly suffered mass killings by second-generation immigrants. Read on.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Rich Lowry: Heed Trump’s Warning

Voting to Leave Europe Is the Most un-Jewish Thing You Can Do

Jews tend to prefer a strong central government because Jews have rarely been popular and have survived for millennia in the diaspora by cutting deals with elites.

Ramzpaul: “It is very anti-Semitic of you to imply that British Jews are Jews first.”

Anshel Pfeffer writes for Haaretz:

It betrays the fortunate legacy of British Jews to hope that a Brexit will deny other refugees of war and dictatorship the sanctuary our great-grandparents received.
Like the overwhelming majority of British Jews, I am the descendant of ancestors who fled countries where persecution and pogroms were the norm. Put simply, if they had failed to find a safe haven in Britain, their descendants would not be alive today.
I find it hard to contain the shame that next Thursday, in the referendum on Britain’s membership in the European Union, many Jews will vote to leave. For all the talk of sovereignty and democracy being used to justify the escape from the grasp of the venal, nonelected bureaucrats in Brussels, the real motive of those voting to leave will be a fear of immigrants.
It doesn’t matter if you’re black-hatted frum or a bacon-eater who hasn’t seen the inside of a shul for decades, and it’s got nothing to do with your politics or how supportive or critical you are of Israel. There can be no more complete betrayal of the fortunate legacy of British Jews than to leave Europe in the hope that this will deny other refugees of war and dictatorship the sanctuary our great-grandparents received. Any attempt to justify it is rank hypocrisy bordering on racism.
There is of course a legitimate concern over the fact that many of the potential immigrants today are Muslims, coming from countries where crude anti-Semitic propaganda is a major staple of the daily diet. It would be foolish to deny the need for vigilance by the security services and the media. Does that mean human beings who had the misfortune to be born in countries where despots use Israel and the Jews as scapegoats for their own crimes should be left to their fate?
Few of the millions of immigrants arriving in Britain over the last century came from model democracies. Our grandparents certainly didn’t. And yet Britain is a more tolerant and open society than ever and, thanks to this tolerance, no minority has prospered more than British Jews.
Double historical burden
And yet, according to a Jewish Chronicle poll conducted last month, over a third of the Jews in Britain are planning to turn their backs on their heritage and vote for a Brexit. Of course, about half are voting to remain (and 17 percent were still undecided), but it beggars belief that it’s not just a few misfits and oddballs – at least 34 percent have no shame.
Jews cannot afford the luxury of having short historical memories. British Jews bear a unique double historical burden. They’re members of the one European minority that suffered more than any other throughout two millennia of mass murder, systematic discrimination and forced conversion. And they’re citizens of the one country in the last century to fight the entire duration of two world wars and the Cold War to rid Europe of dictatorships – Nazism and Communism.
Many of the British complaints over the EU’s restrictions and flawed policies are fully justified, but for all its Francophone dysfunction, today’s Europe – which has enjoyed seven decades of peace and trades in one single market – is more than anything the victory of British values won through immense British sacrifice. And while many Jews justly feel that the EU’s diplomats unfairly focus on criticizing Israel (which in real terms enjoys the most EU trade and cooperation in investment and research among non-European countries), how can they ignore the work done by the Union’s institutions in both fighting anti-Semitism and safeguarding Jewish culture in Europe?
In the company of Le Pen and Putin
Look around; there are still people among us who were alive back when nearly the entire continent was a hunting ground for Jews. Seventy years later, Jews have never been such equal and even honored citizens of Europe as they are today in the EU.

Judaism provides very little guidance for how Jews should vote in gentile elections so saying a vote against the EU is “unJewish” is hyperbole. There’s also nothing in Torah mandating that Jews vote in gentile elections to provide refugees with safe harbor. Judaism is almost entirely concerned with the preservation and welfare of Jews. It has very little to say about gentiles. Remember the story about the goy’s teeth?

The Goy's Teeth (scene from A Serious Man) from Diegech on Vimeo.

I agree with the author that the primary reason some British Jews will vote to leave the EU is fear of immigrants.

“Any attempt to justify it is rank hypocrisy bordering on racism.”

There is no halacah (Jewish law) against racism. Judaism holds, after all, that the Jews are God’s Chosen People.

“Does that mean human beings who had the misfortune to be born in countries where despots use Israel and the Jews as scapegoats for their own crimes should be left to their fate?”

The Torah does not have much to say about such gentile policy questions. Torah certainly does not advocate that a Jewish state accept such people. From the Torah perspective, there is no room for non-Jewish citizenship in the Jewish state. So why should Jews in the diaspora advocate that their particular gentile host country accept Muslims who are fundamentally at odds with the West?

“Few of the millions of immigrants arriving in Britain over the last century came from model democracies. Our grandparents certainly didn’t. And yet Britain is a more tolerant and open society than ever and, thanks to this tolerance, no minority has prospered more than British Jews.”

Anglos create the best countries (examples include the United States, Canada, England, Australia, and New Zealand). When you diminish the Anglo portion of these countries, they go downhill.

“British Jews bear a unique double historical burden. They’re members of the one European minority that suffered more than any other throughout two millennia of mass murder, systematic discrimination and forced conversion. And they’re citizens of the one country in the last century to fight the entire duration of two world wars and the Cold War to rid Europe of dictatorships – Nazism and Communism.”

Jews have suffered more than any other minority?

Posted in England, EU, Europe, Jews | Comments Off on Voting to Leave Europe Is the Most un-Jewish Thing You Can Do

Brooklyn’s Private Jewish Patrols Wield Power. Some Call Them Bullies.

Chaim Amalek: “The obvious way out of this problem is staring us in the face: diversity. Let’s compel the Shomrim to admit as many black goyim as their numbers warrant. Diversity! Is there nothing it can’t do?”

New York Times: Last month, two men linked to the shomrim in Williamsburg admitted taking part in the assault of a black man in their neighborhood. And in April, as part of a federal investigation, a former member of the Borough Park shomrim was arrested on charges of trying to secure handgun permits by offering bribes to the police.

That investigation led last week to the arrest of Norman Seabrook, the powerful head of the New York City correction officers’ union, who had dealings with an Upper West Side real-estate developer with ties to the New York Police Department and to Mayor Bill de Blasio. Several police officials who have come under scrutiny in the investigation had at one time or another held high-ranking posts in the 66th Police Precinct, which covers Borough Park and has in the past come under pressure from the Orthodox community.

In 1978, a mob angry over the murder of an elderly Hasidic man stormed the station house demanding better protection. Thirty years later, a similar crowd destroyed two police cars after a Jewish caterer was arrested during a traffic stop…

…a member of a Crown Heights shomrim group called the Shmira fled to Israel to escape charges of beating a black man with a nightstick; and a decade before that, when two men from another Crown Heights shomrim were convicted of assaulting another a black man with their radios.

The tensions play out in the crowded ethnic landscape of central Brooklyn, where blacks and Hasidim have lived in proximity for decades. Critics of the shomrim say the groups have leveraged this friction: In one of their recruitment videos, ordinary scenes from Borough Park — people shopping, a young boy learning Torah — are intercut with the image of a black man walking through the neighborhood and eventually stealing a woman’s purse…

In many Hasidic neighborhoods, shomrim groups court the police, honoring them at breakfasts at kosher bakeries and attending — sometimes planning — retirement affairs for officials who are leaving the department. When Stephen McAllister took command of the 66th Precinct in 2002, a crowd of Hasidic men, many from the shomrim, stood in line for hours at the station house to welcome him.

“It was a weird, but great, experience,” said Mr. McAllister, now the police commissioner in Floral Park, N.Y. “All of them came in saying: ‘Hi, I’m so-and-so. I’m the most important guy around. Don’t pay any attention to the next guy.’”

Posted in Brooklyn, Shomrim | Comments Off on Brooklyn’s Private Jewish Patrols Wield Power. Some Call Them Bullies.

Belgium Before & After The Muslim Invasion

ClKj2WaWEAAaAUh

ClKj2WaWgAE2uIY

Heretic tweets: “Conservatives never give a single conservative reason for opposing Muslim immigration.”

John Rivers responds: “Muslims are mean to gays, a danger to drunk club girls, and will make Tranny Bathrooms harder to implement.”

Posted in Belgium, Islam | Comments Off on Belgium Before & After The Muslim Invasion

The Rise of “Kamikaze Killers”

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* I note once again that since the Age of Reagan, the US has seen a net gain of some 100 million (that we know about) in one generation, and all of it due to immigration. 229 million 1981, 324 million 2016, and close to 10% of the latter foreign born.

http://www.susps.org/overview/immigration.html

Plus we know that second-generation immigrants tend in the direction of anger, frustration, etc., when they find themselves in environments at odds with their genetic dispositions. (Which for some reason is now the main reason for bringing them in as “refugees”….)

We would surely expect to see a corresponding shift in what the nature of used to be called crimes of passion.

* Yet we still have the same number of Senators (100) and Representatives (435) we had 100 or even 150 million people ago. So your vote is definitely being watered down and your congressional districts are significantly larger, which means your congressman cares even less about you than he did fifty years ago.

The US was fully populated at 150 million. We fought WW2 with about 140 million which was enough to put 12 million into uniform and fill our factories with enough workers to crank out 300K airplanes and all the assorted kit needed to win the largest war in history.

Incidentally if we still had 140 million today, we’d be the 9th or 10th most populous nation on Earth depending upon whether the EU is counted as one entity. And looking at the other nations that would top us at that level would bring no cause for envy. Pretty much all the nations above 140 million are shit holes. In fact outside of Japan the six or so nations that would follow us are shit holes too.

Maybe our leaders should look at the population list and see how the overwhelming majority of the top twenty are all pretty much shit holes. It might, I say might, give them pause.

* Hollywood and the video game industry have acted as a feedback loop amplifying the fascination with lone mass killers amongst alienated men.

* Intimate forms of serial killing are much more difficult to sustain, now, thanks to DNA identification and other forms of modern forensics.

* What we have going on in this country is a “slow, rolling Jihadist Zombie Apocalypse.” By that I mean you can never know when that nice young Muslim boy next store is going to show up at your door screaming “Allahu Akbar” and waving a machete.

This man is a pious young Muslim who attends the Mosque frequently and is quite Religious. He may or may not be outspoken about his beliefs. Unfortunately, there are thousands of Muslims in this country that fit that description and we can’t tell which ones will go ‘Zombie” on us.

Our best bet to ID them is to cut the population of this type of person as much as possible. Start by eliminating all Muslims coming into the country except for those on Diplomatic Passports and spouses. Deport all non-citizen Muslims that we can.

Then make it tough on Muslim families and Mullahs who suspect they might go bad and give them an incentive to turn them in. Do this by deporting all Families that we can of Jihadists who act on their beliefs and closing the Mosques they worshiped at. Put the word out that this will happen.

To do the above will take a change of the POV in DC. A lot more of us will have to die before their attitude will change.

* The serial killer heyday of the 70s and 80s had some characteristics that have declined or disappeared from society. These include hitch hiking, people’s willingness to interact with strangers, street prostitution, the ability of a person working odd jobs to afford a detached house with a basement, and potential victims not leaving a constant trail of their whereabouts with text masseages, selfies, and tower pings. It’s hard to be a psycho killer these days.

* The only good thing that came out of America going from a high trust society to a low trust society is that it has made it a lot harder for serial killers to ply their trade.

* The response to the Orlando massacre sounds like it was a fiasco. One off-duty cop was there when it started and exchanged shots with the Afghan. 14 cops were there at 2:15am, 14 v. 1 (as far as we know), and the killing continued until 5am?

What percentage of the victims do you think were shot by cops?

* [Charles] Whitman [Texas bell tower shooter) tried to get help ahead of time and told medical people he wasn’t right in the head anymore.

But that kind of goes a long with the idea that kamikaze killing wasn’t much at all part of American culture up through the mid-1960s. The seminal event was a guy with a massive medical problem. But that injected the meme of the kamikaze killer into American culture.

Stuff like that had happened before in America, but it didn’t really become part of culture. I’d be interested in reading a study of news coverage of the Whitman shooting. There were big technological advancements in television news around that time, and they may have played a role, along with the rise of the Baby Boomers, in why so much of current social history seems to start right around the time of JFK’s assassination / the Beatles on Ed Sullivan.

* Technology has played a role in both the decline of serial killers and the rise of spree killers. Semiautomatics are far more widely available than they were in the past, which makes spree killing easier. Spree killers also crave attention, which they get far more of now than 50 years ago.

Serial killing is harder thanks to cell phone use, widespread use of security cameras, DNA and other forms of forensic evidence, media, better cooperation and sharing of evidence across jurisdictions, etc. Ted Bundy was probably one of the smartest serial killers ever, and yet he would’ve been caught rather quickly if he were trying to commit his murders in the same manner today.

* Sailer’s description of a ‘Christian’ ethnicity might be valid. Think of how they describe people in Iraq. They have Kurds, Sunni and Shia. Supposedly the Sunni and Shia are both ethnic Arabs, but are classed differently due to religion. Or consider Bosnia where you have Bosniaks (muslims) and Serbs. Bosniaks are probably genetically identical to Serbs, but are treated as a different ethnic group.

You could say they are really treated differently due to religion, but since religion takes on so many features of ones’ diet, holidays, culture, etc., they are effectively treated as different ethnic groups.

* I’d like to think there was some correlation between belief in the afterlife and being judged, and that that would explain why we have so many mass killers in our society today, rather than yesterday, but it just doesn’t work. In the first place I don’t think that mass killings are common in faiths such as Hinduism, Buddhism, or whatever faiths are most common in China and Japan. So there has to be some reason why it is so common that doesn’t have to do with a doctrine of salvation/damnation.

Serial killers presuppose a degree of urbanization and fragmentation. But even so, people like Hamilton Fish, Belle Gunness, the Lonely Hearts Killers, as well as the ones you mentioned were active well before the 1960′s.

I think the reason serial killers took off in the ’60′s up through the early ’90′s (e.g., Joel Rifkin, Jeffrey Dahmer) is because people, usually women but always (cf. John Wayne Gacy, Dahmer, Wayne Williams) were floating around anonymously and were easy to kill without anyone noticing.

In addition to serial killers however you have also spree killers like the Starkweather-Fugati dyad in 1957. They are not exactly the same thing.

Mass killers like Charles Whitman probably start there, but as a grace note I should say that Whitman was preceded by the shocking murder of the 8 nurses in Chicago by Richard Speck, which took place about two weeks earlier. I remember the Whitman case unfolding on the radio that day, I don’t recall there being any significant TV coverage. At any rate, the latter was I guess a spree killing, rather than a “kamikaze killing.”

As for kamikazes the Japanese in WW2 were not the only ones to do this, the Balinese did it several times against the Dutch in the early 20th Century. (and they are Hindus.) And we also know that modern suicide bombing began in Sri Lanka, the Tamil Tigers, and they, too, are Hindus, I believe.

It’s really hard to connect up all of these types of killings.

I would agree that the Orlando killings, the VA Tech killings, 9/11, Sandy Hook, Columbine, Bataclan, the Aurora theater shootings, and others, might fit this typological setting of “Kamikaze killings,” except even there there are differences; most of those were brought on by anger and a desire to take the world with them, while three of them were clearly motivated by Islamic rewards. Except: some of the Bataclan killers tried to flee, as did the Charlie Hebdo killers, so we are back at square one. Also, we have to include the Bath School Disaster in this enumeration, even though it happened 80 years ago, and was motivated by nothing more complicated than raised taxes and a lost election. And we can’t forget the various terrorist and anarchist bombings, either.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Rise of “Kamikaze Killers”

Ilana Mercer: In Order To Survive, Perhaps Christians Should Consider Converting To Judaism?

Ilana Mercer writes: There’s none of this turn-the-other-cheek, love-your-enemy, expiate-for-enemy’s-sins stuff in The Hebrew Bible and in Judaism, generally. There’s justice. Be just to your enemies, yes! But love them, welcome them into your home, let them walk all over you, even kill you when The Prophet moves them? Never!
In order to survive, perhaps Christians should consider converting to Judaism?

Posted in Christianity | Comments Off on Ilana Mercer: In Order To Survive, Perhaps Christians Should Consider Converting To Judaism?

Growing Up

Most of my addictions feel related to my unwillingness to grow up and take on adult responsibility. I prefer the easy way out.

Certain people, umm like me, just develop the mentality that others will take care of them.

Many parents modify their wills to take care of their loser kids who won’t care for themselves and leave zero dollars to successful kids. I understand the allure of under-functioning and relying on others to over-function and take care of me.

* Friend who mocks the Alexander Technique tweaked his neck moving stuff. Wanted to say to him, “Shame you don’t know the Technique, bro.”

* Luke proclaims: “I don’t judge!”
Friend: “You don’t care.”

* I hate it when the cool kids find me uncool. I talk too much and give myself away.

* I’m helpless before my willful need to hunt people down to hear my jokes. My name is Omar, I go to gay bar, I have AR-15, Allahu Akbar (not even my joke).

* When you’re making out with a girl for the first time and she asks, “What are you looking for?” What do you say? Asking for a friend.

Ragged: @lukeford is that what she means?–in life? So hot that she asked you that. I’d say: “a sovereign white nation state.”

* With the time I saved by color coding my keys, I’ve become fluent in Pashtun.

* That vegan nut lasagna in my fridge from Shuvuot is screaming my name!

* AsianConservativeMan ‏@aconman_ Jun 15:
Top retorts to any Trump policy:
• it goes against our values
• it’s not who we are
• we’re better than that
• are you kidding me
• just wow

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Growing Up

R. Mordechai Finley: My experience of an active shooter incident

Rabbi Finley writes:

Sometime in 1979 (I actually forget exactly when), my ex-wife and I were at LAX picking up her sister and brother in law from a flight from Israel. I seem to recall that what is now the international terminal was under construction, so we met them at the baggage claim around where Terminal 3 is today.
While we were standing at baggage claim, I – we all – heard shots. I looked through the large plate-glass window, and on the other side I saw a woman holding what seemed to be an enormous handgun, shooting at people.
We – everyone – ran and hid. I pushed my then wife under a bench, and then I slid in beside her. Within a few seconds, though, my military training kicked in. I was just three years out of the Marines, and I distinctly remember thinking, “I am not going to get shot and killed here, hiding, lying down.” I decided to fight. I got up and went toward the sound of the gunfire.
I remember thinking the moment I got up that the sandals I was wearing were noisy. They flapped. I kicked them off and snuck toward the plate-glass window. (I have rarely worn sandals since).
I saw the woman stop shooting. I saw one wounded person through the glass; the rest had fled the hall. I then saw the woman walking out from the terminal to the sidewalk with gun in hand, make a right and head our way. I yelled at everyone who was hiding in the baggage claim area to get out quick. People seemed frozen in place. I yelled again for everyone to get out.
I hid on the side of the entrance to the baggage claim with my back to the narrow wall holding the plate glass, next to the sidewalk, determined to attack her when she turned the corner. A young Marine in uniform was tentatively approaching me from the side. I looked at the insignia on his upper sleeve, and said “Lance Corporal, when she turns this corner, you and I are going to take her down.”
Maybe when he saw me go toward the window it inspired him to join me. Not enough. I am sad to say that he thought for a brief second, then ran. I remember feeling alone.
She indeed came down the sidewalk and turned the corner. She was about my height (5’9”), or even taller. A big, heavy woman. She turned and faced me and still had the handgun in her hand right hand, but it was not (yet) pointed at me. I found myself staring into her eyes for what was probably a fraction of a second but seemed much longer. The white of her eyes (the sclera, to use the right word) were yellow. I saw what I could only describe as craziness. I felt mesmerized, swallowed up. Again, I think my military training kicked in, and I forced myself to into action.
I lunged at her before she could raise her gun. A man nearby, short but stocky, sprang up from his hiding place under some luggage right after I engaged her, bashing her with a suitcase. He and I got her down and pinned her. I seem to recall that I had her torso and he had her hands. When she slammed into the sidewalk, the gun spun out of her hand.

Posted in R. Mordecai Finley | Comments Off on R. Mordechai Finley: My experience of an active shooter incident

The Left’s Hypocrisy on Online Harassment and Anti-Semitism

Mike Cernovich writes: The Internet is a dangerous place, according to Jewish journalists who dislike having (((echoes))) places around their names. Yes, grown men are actually outraged that some trolls will put their last names in parentheses to identify them as Jews. People do (((this))) to me, by the way, too.

There are also plenty of pictures of me in ovens, and I’m told “the day of the rope” won’t be kind to me.

Oh well.

Cry more.

Why does the left cry about online harassment while ignoring the real-life harassment we receive?

When I or my friends attempt to hold a meeting or seminar, do you know what happens? People don’t post mean Tweets or call it a (((conference))). Instead they call in bomb threats to the venue. Or they make up lies about the people giving a seminar in order to no-platform us.

When I set up a Gorilla Mindset seminar, this message was sent to the venue owner:

Message: I believe you are hosting a seminar for Mike Cernovich. I thought you should know that he was tweeting today in favor of the shooting at planned parenthood in Colorado. Never want to see another business get tainted by such people.

This is a direct attack on my income and my reputation. Where was the media outrage?

SJWs have called the Los Angeles Police Department on me to attempt to have me Swatted. Where was the hand wringing from those who bravely signal their opposition to (((online trolls))).

The California State Bar has dealt with multiple false accusations against me.

I was falsely accused of threatening a woman who can’t wipe her own bottom with rape.

Where were their think pieces?

Let’s look at the “harassment” issue rationally.

On the one hand, Jewish pundits have people troll them. Guess what, people troll me every day. If you don’t have a thick skin, don’t share your words and ideas with the world.

Meanwhile I have people call the police on me, report me to the State Bar, and lie about me to prevent me from giving mindset seminars. (They always fail and I always give my seminars, which happen worldwide to rave reviews.)

And as far as my friends go, I have it pretty easy.

Vox Day had to hire private security for our happy hour in Paris France, which was covered in Le Monde.

Milo Yiannopoulos had his talk at DePaul university shut down due to violence:

Milo Yiannopoulos’ event at DePaul University had to be cut short Tuesday night after protesters stormed the stage, blew whistles, grabbed the microphone out of the interviewer’s hand, and threatened to punch Yiannopoulos in the face.

Roosh had entire countries ban him from entry after the dishonest media claimed he was holding seminars on how to rape people.

Where was the outrage from the (((mainstream media)))? Where were the “free speech bloggers”?

To the surprise of no one who follows these issues, the people who virtue signal how appalled they are by “online harassment” were silent.

The left doesn’t care about “harassment.”
They are simply looking to silence the right.

While media pundits complain about (((harassment))), I can’t even announce a seminar venue in advance due to the risk that a bomb threat will be called in, canceling my event.

I’ve had to waste time responding to complaints made to the State Bar.

And I had to leave my house for a weekend after a Swatting attempt was made on me.

The left doesn’t care. You won’t read articles in the New York Times disavowing violence from the left.

Posted in Internet | Comments Off on The Left’s Hypocrisy on Online Harassment and Anti-Semitism

Ann Coulter: Did Anyone Talking About Trump’s Speech Actually Hear It?

Ann Coulter writes: The media have lost their minds after Trump’s magnificent speech on Monday. It’s all hands on deck, no attack is too extreme. Their main point is: DO NOT LOOK AT THAT SPEECH. It has “words that wound.” Much too dangerous even to read it.

Instead of reporting what Trump said, the media give us the “gist” of it (in the sense of an unrecognizable distortion). It was awful, Hitlerian, beneath our dignity as a nation. They lie about what he said and then attack their own lies as if they’re attacking Trump.

The Washington Post’s headline, which got their reporters banned from Trump’s press briefings, was:Donald Trump seems to connect President Obama to Orlando shooting.”

I guess OK, You’re Right, didn’t sound professional, so the Post pretended not to understand Trump’s speech, at all. We can’t makes heads or tails of it, but he seems to be saying …

One thing Trump is not, is unclear.

Contrary to the Post’s headline suggesting that Trump had posited some crazy theory about Obama secretly meeting with Omar Mateen to plot the attack—No, this gun is much better for a mass shooting, Omar—Trump criticized the Obama administration policies that are not keeping us safe. (It’s completely unprecedented to respond to a mass murder by criticizing the policies that allowed it to happen!)

After San Bernardino and Orlando—also, the Boston Marathon, Fort Hood, Little Rock, Chattanooga and Times Square—quite obviously, Trump is right.

Washington Post: We’re confused. What do you mean?

How about: Washington Post seems to Connect President Bush to Abu Ghraib

Washington Post, May 26, 2006: “Bush has … addressed Abu Ghraib the same way he did last night: Expressing regret without responsibility.”

Or: Democrats Seem to Connect President Bush to Anti-Americanism in Muslim World

Washington Post, May 20, 2005: “It is certainly true that the Bush administration, at Guantanamo and at Abu Ghraib, is responsible for a good deal of anti-Americanism in the Muslim world.”

Or: Washington Post Seems to Connect President Bush to Missing WMDs and Katrina Deaths

Washington Post, April 5, 2006: “How much was President Bush personally responsible for taking the country to war under false pretenses, or for the botched response to Hurricane Katrina? To hear the White House tell it, it wasn’t really his fault.”

In his speech, Trump said:

“The killer was an Afghan, of Afghan parents, who immigrated to the United States. His father published support for the Afghan Taliban, a regime which murders those who don’t share its radical views. The father even said he was running for president of that country.

“The bottom line is that the only reason the killer was in America in the first place was because we allowed his family to come here.

“That is a fact, and it’s a fact we need to talk about.

“We have a dysfunctional immigration system which does not permit us to know who we let into our country, and it does not permit us to protect our citizens.”

Immediately after Trump’s speech, MSNBC’s Katie Tur “fact-checked” Trump, announcing that he had incorrectly said Omar was “born in Afghan.”

What did Tur think this meant? “Afghan” isn’t a country. Didn’t she pause for a moment and realize that what she thought he said makes no sense? Journalists with their outsized sense of importance say, No, no, that’s not what I heard. It says in my notes right here, you said, “blue carrots for Eisenhower.” I stand by my notes.

Obviously, what Trump said was that Omar was “born an Afghan.” Which he was.

The media began indignantly informing us that Trump was wrong because—as The Washington Post put it: “The shooter was born in Queens to parents who emigrated from Afghanistan.”

With the media, you’re an “American” when you commit the worst mass shooing in U.S. history, an “Afghan” when you’re applying to college. You’re an “American” when you shoot up the San Bernardino community center, a “Pakistani” when you’re offended by Trump’s remarks. You’re an “American” when you slaughter troops at Fort Hood, a “Muslim” when the Army realizes it can’t fire you.

This can lead to confusion. After the Post snippily corrected Trump on Omar not being an “Afghan” on Monday, on Tuesday, the Post admitted he was. Headline: “Orlando gunman said he carried out attack to get ‘Americans to stop bombing his country,’ witness says.”

The Atlantic’s Ron Fournier, Dispenser of Conventional Liberal Opinion, wrote an article on Trump’s speech titled A Victory Lap in Bloodthat would make any Social Justice Warrior proud.

Like the rest of the media’s reviews of a speech they apparently didn’t read, there were no quotes from Trump’s speech. Instead, Fournier [Send him mail] ran through a string of accusations, SJW-style: “You didn’t call it,” “You are helping ISIS recruit terrorists,” “You are dividing Americans …”

Trump never claimed he “called it,” but, if he ever does, Fournier has a fantastic takedown:

“You didn’t warn that an American man named Omar Mateen, a well-educated security guard investigated by the FBI for suspected ties to terrorism, would legally purchase a weapon made for warfare and use it to slaughter 49 people at a popular gay nightclub.”

Hillary Clinton is presidential because she wants to dramatically increase the number of unvetted Syrian refugees we bring in. But Trump is an embarrassment because he doesn’t have superhuman powers to know that a “man named Omar Mateen” would attack an Orlando nightclub.

Fournier repeated the fake fact currently sweeping the nation about Trump thinking he deserves congratulations, writing, “Donald Trump wants a pat on the back.”

But then Fournier made the fatal mistake of quoting Trump’s tweet allegedly saying this: “Appreciate the congrats for being right on radical Islamic terrorism, I don’t want congrats, I want toughness & vigilance. We must be smart!”

Fournier’s “Trump wants a pat on the back” was 12 words away from Trump saying, “I don’t want congrats.” Even the most bored reader is probably going to make it that far.

Now you see why reporters aren’t quoting Trump and have to hope you won’t read the speech for yourself.

VDARE.com Note: Here it is, you can read or see for yourselfDonald J. Trump Addresses Terrorism, Immigration, and National Security, Donald J Trump for President, June 13, 2016.

COPYRIGHT 2015 ANN COULTER

DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK

Ann Coulter is the legal correspondent for Human Events and writes a popular syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate. She is the author of ELEVEN New York Times bestsellers—collect them here.

Her book, ¡Adios America! The Left’s Plan To Turn Our Country Into A Third World Hell Hole, was released on June 1, 2015.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Ann Coulter: Did Anyone Talking About Trump’s Speech Actually Hear It?