An American perspective: Why is it, that throughout their history, at every opportunity, Russians consistently make the wrong decision? What is it that Russians incorrectly intuit about the world? Why do they have the lowest trust most corrupt nation of all the white peoples? Why is it that Russians are the one white people who have failed.
If any people was ever incapable of self government, it’s Russians. If any people was less capable of governing others. It’s the Russians. What is it about the Russian character that causes them to consistently fail? What metaphysical assumption about the nature of man and his relationship to the world is so flawed that unless tightly bound to europe they contribute nothing to legacy of white people? Why is it that western peoples have dragged the entire world out of ignorance mysticism sickness and poverty, while russians try consistently to reverse the trend by dragging those white people near them into their failed civilization?
Why is it that Russians have nothing to offer the world other than corruption, violence, fear and poverty?
Why are Russians the only white people who have failed?
Forget moral equivalency. Go with the facts. Russians have the market on corruption, brutality, oppression, and have destroyed every white nation that they have touched with their corruption. And murdered more of their own people than any white people in history. Russians have nothing constructive to offer the world, and everything they do causes suffering.
* What really matters is that Jews rule US, and more diversity means more ‘divide and rule’ among diverse goyim. That is what Jews want, and that is what they will get.
Btw, diverse Brazil and South Africa got ‘gay marriage’ before US did.
In both cases, the homo thing got huge backing from globalist Jewish power.
* I would guess that a lot of the Russian-speakers [in the San Fernando Valley] are related by blood or marriage to Israelis and/or Armenians, but it can be pretty tenuous. A lot of the shoppers in the Jon’s Supermarket in North Hollywood look Russian enough that they could pick up some work as flathead bodyguards for Russian bad guys in movies. Or in real life, too.
And then there are the Other Slavs, Ukrainians, Bulgarians, Bosnians, etc.
It’s a pretty interesting phenomenon, but they are a tight-lipped bunch and don’t seem interested in talking to journalists or academics about what is going.
* Portland might be the canary in the multicultural coal mine. They are filling up the greater metro area with Mexicans and Muslims. The city remains mostly white but with a budding Muslim population. In the city many of them are students who will presumably go home. Apparently there’s a lot of money here; I’ve seen at least two high-dollar sports cars with Kuwaiti and I think Emirates plates that a resident vulgarian paid to ship in. And they love to party. All they seem to do is smoke weed, drink and lurk about the females; they embody the first half of the cliche (of the degenerate Muslim dumbass who “self-radicalizes” and straps on a bomb) to a comic tee. God help us.
It’s a good thing we’ve been steadily chipping away at the idea of standards of behavior all these years; someone might get the idea all these poor Muslim Baby Bodies were a bad idea.
When I see the nice families of the other growing ethnic group–Asians–walking around, enjoying the amenities of a fine city, I get the impression they’re somewhat aware they’re going to be running things to a large extent, soon. It’s like they’re touring the grounds of their new colony. I hope they have some appreciation when the time comes.
* It’s pretty easy to tell apart Russians, Ukrainians, etc., who look like narrow-sense Whites and Russian-speaking Caucasians, who do not. Steve is right. Moldova and Ookrayeena are the most corrupt countries in Europe (the difference is especially clear if the Balkans are excluded). The same holds for Moldovans and Ookrayeeneans (for whom Steve’s description of Russians fits best) if Caucasians and Balkan people are excluded. Russians and Belorussians are a little better at self-government, but are still very, very different people from Germans, Balts, Poles and Finns.
The “distance from the Canadian border” rule also applies to Europe (including Eastern Europe), if the Canadian border is re-defined as the North Pole (hunter-gatherer exceptions apply).
Remember, Indo-Europeans came out of southern Russia and the northern Caucasus. Which partly explains Afghanistan today. Of course, other Indo-European people (e.g., Poles) were much more successful. But that may be in a large part due to genetics as well.
* I can’t speak directly to the Valley or greater LA, but if it mirrors the trends that are happening in NYC, then the newest batch of ex-Soviet immigrants are indeed largely Russians, Caucasians, Uzbeks and others from central Asian -stan countries. (I’d say less Russians and more from the other republics.)
Whatever they are — they’re not Jewish. All the Jews who wanted to leave have already done so a long time ago. Even the ground zero of Russian-Jewish immigration, southern Brooklyn, has changed remarkably in recent years with the huge influx of ex-Soviet but non-Jewish immigrants. It’s very noticeable.
The migration has been driven mostly by lower-skilled workers looking to make a few bucks and send the rest home, and by young women looking for husbands. While I think they’re far from the worst people washing up on our shores, I do agree that they will assimilate very poorly, or not at all. (Again, mostly talking about the Caucasians and -stans, and not so much Russians).
* Right, here’s a classic in political science that shows that “public opinion” is pretty much whatever elites want it to be.
The Council of Conservative Citizens is considered crazy and hateful for focusing on black on white crime, while CNN is a respected news source that implies that cops are regularly hunting down young men of color. Most Americans are more scared of ISIS than illegal immigrants, even though the latter kills many more people, as Ann Coulter points out.
The narrative that they’re pushing need not have any connection to reality. And most people will eat it up, because they don’t have the time or inclination to think about these things themselves.
The idea that the descendants of Mexicans are going to rise up and repeal feminist and gay-friendly legislation is laughable. Gay marriage is even legal in Mexico now! And for no other reason than the elites wanted it. “Diversity” on college campuses in California hasn’t stopped them from getting crazier and crazier. It’ll be the same with the larger society.
* I recently moved to Brighton Beach in Brooklyn (“Little Russia by the Sea”). It’s overwhelmingly Jewish-Russian (throw in some Uzbeks as well I suppose). I am still learning the ropes, but I hear lots of little, grand-standing arguments amongst them about “following the rules” with regards to not walking on the grass or not smoking under the awning or whatever. But then I go to the myriad fruit and vegetable shops up and down Bright Ave and I see everyone is paying with EBT cards…and then getting into their Bugattis or Rolls-Royces and driving away. (The phrase I mutter to myself every time is, “Penny compliant; pound criminal.”) I’m curious if you’re seeing anything remotely similar in the San Fernando valley, and whether this is just a Jewish-Russian thing or a [non-hyphenated] Russian thing.
* Like the other hucksters of Conservative Inc. Coulter usually waits until it is safe to stake out her turf. She’s very good at sounding like a heretic, while making it clear she poses no threat to the orthodoxy. This is a woman who goes drinking with Bill Maher on a regular basis, after all.
This is not the wheel turning in our favor. Coulter is the signal that the game is lost.
* She did say in one column:
Adelson himself [told the Los Angeles Times] he wanted to “Put a big fence around our country.”
By “our country,” he, of course, meant Israel. In America, he wants illegal immigrants pouring across the border to provide him with an endless supply of cheap labor.
But she usually steers clear of that factor.
* As for Jim Crow, I once believed it was an appalling oppression of a people and a denial of their basic humanity, solely based on their race. But in light of the increasing amount and savagery of black-on-white crime in the US, denied by the MSM but celebrated by many blacks on WorldStarHipHop, I now believe it was less a cruel and unnecessary measure to oppress blacks and more a necessary evil to protect whites from the blacks in their midst.