The Washington Post Links To American Renaissance!

Alexander Hart writes for VDARE:

Well, now, the Establishment. Left and Right, is paying attention to race realists—but they aren’t laughing at us, we’re laughing at them. Over the past few months, snarky right wingers have popularized the term “cuckservative”—a portmanteau of cuckold and conservative—on social media and message boards, most notably the website and Facebook group, The Right Stuff, My Posting Career, and twitter accounts like @Cuckservative and Snark Enlightenment. [VDARE.com note: This marks the first time the term has appeared on VDARE.com, because of Editor Peter Brimelow’s notorious prudishness]

Some of these memes were vulgar and even more Politically Incorrect than sites like VDARE and American Renaissance. Yet many were original, funny, and struck at the truth of the Republican Party and Conservatism Inc.’s failure to actually conserve the people who created and support it. A couple of examples:

  • “Cuckservatives… A person who wishes for America’ return to 1950’s values/strength, without admitting the nation was 90% white then”
  • White children need to become a minority and the USA a third world country through LEGAL, not illegal immigration
  • “Immigration isn’t a winning issue, let’s talk about tax cuts for corporations with rainbow avatars instead.” –

[Important: Roundup of #Cuckservative articles and memes, Occam’s Razor Mag, July 26, 2015]

While most of this was tongue-in-cheek, Alfred Clark published a serious definition of it on Radix Journal: a white conservative or libertarian “who thinks he’s promoting his own interests but really isn’t.” He further noted that the cuckservative will try to attack the Left by calling Democrats “the real racists” or by suggesting that abortion is “racist” because blacks and Hispanics disproportionately choose to have the procedure. And in contrast to opposition to abortion or strident support for Israel,

…the cuckservative feels uncomfortable about issues like immigration. If the cuckservative is not an outright open-borders shill, he will only give lip service about “securing the border” or “opposing illegal but favoring legal immigration” but he will never talk about immigration very much. After all, immigration has very serious implications for Western Civilization, so it doesn’t concern the cuckservative.

[“Cuckservative,” A Definition, July 16, 2015]

After inquiring why people called him a “cuckservative,” RedState’s Erick Erickson stumbled upon the Radix Journal article and described it as “a slur against Christian voters coined by white-supremacists.” Erickson doubled down on this interpretation without finding a single quote from anti-cuckservative activists critical of Christianity. Instead he cited various quotes like “anyone voting to destroy Christian lands by importing or breeding a horde of hostile minorities is a cuckold” and “you’re like Esau selling his birthright for a bowl of pottage” as proof of anti-Christian animus. [Cuckservative” is a Racist Slur and an Attack on Evangelical Christians, July 29, 2015]

The Daily Caller’s Matt Lewis was at least capable of looking up cuckold on Wikipedia and wrote,

A cuckold, of course, is a legitimate word for the husband of an adulterous wife — but that doesn’t really do justice to what they’re suggesting here, either. The people who throw this term around are most likely referencing a type of pornography whereby a (usually, white) man is “humiliated” (or ironically thrilled) by being forced to watch his wife having sex with another (usually, black) man.

Lewis argued that his critics believed that “by supporting immigration reform, criminal justice reform, etc., a white conservative is therefore surrendering his honor and masculinity (and it won’t be long before his women folk are compromised, as well!).” [What’s Behind The ‘Cuckservative’ Slur?, July 23, 2015]

This prompted the same Leftists who enthusiastically embraced much more vulgar terms like “Teabagger” pompously to psychoanalyze the supposed sexual insecurities of “white supremacists”. For example, Buzzfeed noted that the point was to allude “to a genre of porn in which passive white husbands watch their wives have sex with black men, it casts its targets as impotent defenders of white people in America.” [Joseph Bernstein, Behind The Racist Hashtag That Is Blowing Up Twitter, July 27, 2015] Mediaite said the users of the word were both “racist” and “sexually anxious.” [Trump Fans Target ‘Mike Cuckabee’ for Being a ‘Cuckservative,’ By Tommy Christopher, July 29, 2015] The New Republic did the most psychoanalyzing of the joke:

the term cuckservative is popular because it pushes psycho-sexual hot buttons. Racism and sexism have always been connected, with one of the prime justifications for racial hierarchy being the supposed need to protect white women from black men and also, more implicitly, to keep black women sexually submissive to white men. A cuckservative thus conjures up one of the supreme nightmares of the white supremacist imagination, the fear that white men will assume a submissive role (or position) in the sexual hierarchy.

Conservatives Are Holding a Conversation About Race, By Jeet Heer, July 26, 2015

Meanwhile, Matt Lewis became completely unhinged in the Daily Beast, describing his twitter antagonists as “evil and primitive.” Even worse, many of them “have Confederate flag avatars”! After this preening, Lewis got to his point.

I think it’s fair to say that we on the center-right have been defending ourselves and our movement against charges of racism for so long that we’ve forgotten that, well, our side has some racists…whereas they were once confined to the nether regions of the Internet, now Twitter allows them to spread their pernicious message, and Trump has given them a candidate to get behind.

Lewis then declared his goal to purge them: “I can’t police the left, but my hope in writing this is to sound the alarm on the right.” [Twitter’s Right-Wing Civil War, July 28, 2015].

Yet unlike the past victims of would-be right wing excommunicators, Lewis’s targets are largely anonymous and independent. Rather than marginalizing the Dissident Right, he and his other cuckservative allies have merely given it more attention.

And not all the attention has been un-objective. Dave Weigel of the Washington Post just published a piece that gave Radix Journal Editor Richard Spencer an opportunity to explain the insult in an intelligent and reasonable manner:

The ‘cuck’ slur is vulgar, yes, but then piercingly accurate. It is the cuckold who, whether knowingly or unknowingly, loses control of his future. This is an apt psychological portrait of white ‘conservatives,’ whose only identity is comprised of vague, abstract ‘values,’ and who are participating in the displacement of European Americans — their own children.

[‘Cuckservative’ — the conservative insult of the month, explained, July 29, 2015]

Weigel also linked (!) to an American Renaissance article that explained: “While cuckservatives claim to adhere to abstract principles, wiser men and women understand that ideology is often the echo of racial, cultural, and ethnic interests. And since cuckservatives no longer bother concealing they care nothing for their own white supporters, frustrated whites are looking for alternatives.” [What is a Cuckservative? by Gregory Hood, July 24, 2015]

Moreover, not all mainstream conservative outlets are following Lewis and Erickson’s lead. While distancing himself from more of its extreme proponents, Milo Yiannopoulos defended the term in a lead Breitbart.com Op Ed, noting that

cuckservative memes are about GOP spinelessness on immigration, lies the political left tells about racism in America today, or simple frustration with the perceived limp-wristedness of the right-wing Establishment in the face of the vast left-wing smear machine.

[‘Cuckservative’ Is a Gloriously Effective Insult That Should Not Be Slurred, Demonized, or Ridiculed, July 28, 2015]

Instead of marginalizing the Dissident Right, the cuckservatives have exposed hundreds of thousands, if not millions of conservatives to intelligently-expressed heterodox opinions that undermine Conservatism Inc.’s basic premises and conceptualize it as a problem. The comment threads suggest this is resonating.

Posted in Conservatives | Comments Off on The Washington Post Links To American Renaissance!

There Should Be Zero Jobs That Whites Won’t Do

I want to live in an America where white people pick up the trash, use leaf blowers, clean toilets, work as janitors, hookers, fruit pickers, mechanics, gardeners, maids just as I want the same for Israel with Jews doing these basic tasks. Nationalism for everyone!

A white South African was “someone who would rather be murdered in his bed than make it.” We know how that turned out. Best for every group to blow their own leaves, and to make their own beds.

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on There Should Be Zero Jobs That Whites Won’t Do

IQ & Race

Chaim Amalek writes:

All talk of IQ is just another trap for the unwary white, and another path to becoming a cuckservative. After all, if IQ defines the merit of a population group, then you should cheer the conquest of the white race by East Asians. Whites lose. And if some subset of black suddenly started scoring higher than whites, would you want them to displace whites? Of course not. Whites would again lose. The argument is to support your group not because it is smarter or more ethical than other groups (although in some regards it may be), but because it is your group, and you want your group, your race, your people and your kin to succeed even if it means others will fail.

Also, you don’t see Jews making this mistake, at least not racially/tribally conscious torah yidden like Luke Ford. They don’t support one another because they score higher on IQ tests, but because they are Jews and goyim are not.

Finally, the forward-thinking white knows that a stupid, low-IQ immigrant, provided he is denied welfare and is heavily policed, is less of a threat to the white man of above average intelligence than is the brilliant immigrant from India or Korea who can handle whatever job he may be doing for less cost, and thus drive him to penury.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on IQ & Race

WaPo On The Cuckservative Insult

Dave Weigel writes: Late last week, a neologism was born. Twitter was the incubator. “Cuckservative,” a portmanteau of “conservative” and “cuckold” (i.e. a man whose wife has cheated on him) burned up Twitter as fans of Donald Trump’s politicking warred with the movement conservatives who opposed it.

RedState.com’s Erick Erickson, the Daily Caller’s Matt Lewis, and the team at the well-read conservative blog Ace of Spades were among the critics suddenly deluged with accusations of cuckservatism.

Below, we explain.

What is “cuckservatism?”

I’ll defer to Richard Spencer, president of the white nationalist National Policy Institute.

“#Cuckservative” is a full-scale revolt, by Identitarians and what I’ve called the ‘alt Right,’ against the Republican Party and conservative movement,” Spencer explained in an e-mail. “The ‘cuck’ slur is vulgar, yes, but then piercingly accurate. It is the cuckold who, whether knowingly or unknowingly, loses control of his future. This is an apt psychological portrait of white ‘conservatives,’ whose only identity is comprised of vague, abstract ‘values,’ and who are participating in the displacement of European Americans — their own children…

According to Spencer, “Trump is a major part of the ‘cuckservative’ phenomenon — but not because he himself is an Identitarian or traditionalist. His campaign is, in many ways, a backward-looking movement: ‘Let’s make America great again!’ Why Trump is attractive to Identitarians and the alt Right is: a) he is a tougher, superior man than ‘conservatives’ (which isn’t saying much), and b) he seems to grasp the demographic displacement of European-Americans on a visceral level. We see some hope there.”

…The white nationalism represented by Spencer has struggled to find footing. Youth for Western Civilization, a student group that attempted to bring millennials on campus into the “traditionalist” cause, burned brightly for a few years, then went inactive.

If you’re asking how many people might agree with the underlying argument — that the conservative movement has accommodated the cultural left for too long — the answer might be millions. As many as 45 percent of self-identified “conservative Republicans” oppose any legal status for undocumented immigrants — i.e., they oppose the establishment Republican position, as represented by Jeb Bush and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Obviously, most of the people on the “kick ’em out” side of the ledger would hardly consider that an expression of white nationalism. “Cuckservative” is a frame that might be bigger than its founders intended.

Posted in Conservatives | Comments Off on WaPo On The Cuckservative Insult

Trump Cornering Market On White Voters

Reuters: In Trump’s case, he appears to be cornering the market on white voters, the backbone of the current Republican Party, the poll shows. Republicans need as many white votes as possible to offset demographic shifts in the United States that have handed Democrats an electoral advantage in the last two presidential elections.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump Cornering Market On White Voters

Why My Biracial Son Doesn’t Want To Date Jewish Girls

Ayanna Nahmias writes: Any man I’m with has to be committed to raising my son as his own. It’s very hard for a man to do that if he can’t see himself in a child — and that would be the case with most Ashkenazi men and my biracial son. Depending on who’s looking, my son is seen as either Latino or Israeli. But no one will ever mistake him for an Ashkenazi.

…It’s not just that the process has been difficult for me — my son has suffered because his mother was “not yet” Jewish, and because he is biracial. Bullied from kindergarten until he left Hebrew school, he was often excluded from events like birthday parties or sleepovers, and he never really made friends. He missed out on opportunities to develop the social skills that are practiced during these formative years. It was painful for him, and excruciating for me to watch him go through this, though I tried to protect him as much as I could so that he’d continue to get an Orthodox Hebrew education.
During all this, we kept on attending Orthodox synagogues — mostly Chabad, sometimes Modern Orthodox. But after my conversion was complete and we were fully Jewish, I noticed that my 13-year-old son was starting to look at non-Jewish girls his age. I confronted him: Why didn’t he like the girls at synagogue?
Because of the rejection he experienced, and the fact that he never saw himself reflected in the community, he observed that Jewish girls were “very pretty, but they all look the same.”
When he told me that he needed diversity, needed to see people from all different parts of the world — including Jews who looked like him — I explained that he could find that in Israel one day, but that we couldn’t make aliyah at the moment. He was firm: He wanted to see himself and he wanted to be seen.

Daniel de Porto comments:

The Forward jumps at every opportunity to make the orthodox community look bad. First of all, at 13, this boy should not be dating for marriage. Second, I don’t know where or in what decade this article was written, but in LA, where I live, which is the largest Jewish community west of NY, I look around and see a lot of diversify. There are bi-racial and fully racial Asian and black Jews, besides those of middle eastern descent. Gone forever are the days you walk down a major street in my neighborhood on Shabbos and only see Ashkenazim. Where is she living? Borough Park? Who knows? The Forward conveniently left that out.

I have visited orthodox Jewish elementary schools where racially diverse kids are fully accepted by their peers. So I’m gonna guess that this kid may have social or psychological issues that is causing his inability to blend with his peers. Young people these days, more than ever, are color blind and easily accept those who look different. But liberal rags, like the Forward, and race baters want to believe that the problems are all about the religious pale face’s inability to accept diversify.

As far as this woman’s difficulty in dating, it’s just too easy to blame the men for not accepting a bi racial son. An interview with any Ashkenazi middle aged woman with a fully Ashkenazi son will expose the difficulty even they have of finding any man who is willing to take on the responsibility of raising another man’s child. Marriage is a big step for anyone. I’m sure most women would also avoid a situation that would force them to accept an instant family.

But this rag was determined to, once again, paint orthodox Ashkenazim as intolerant racists. So they avoided inconvenient information that might present another side to this story and, thereby, got the outcome they desired.

Posted in Conversion, Race | Comments Off on Why My Biracial Son Doesn’t Want To Date Jewish Girls

What to Do When Your App Is Racist

Paul Ciotti: Andrew Marantz seems really pissed at the idea of SketchFactor, which he clearly thinks was almost blatantly racist. Okay fine. He may be right. (I wasn’t able to find it to test it). He’s even mad that the creator had the effrontery to leave the App up even though no one is apparently downloading it. What makes me mad though is that Marantz doesn’t recommend any other Apps to help people unfamiliar with a town avoid “sketchy” (possibly dangerous) neighborhoods. There is a need for an App (or something else) in that kind of situation. What’s his advice for helping people not get hassled or mugged? Or doesn’t he care? I suspect the latter.

ANDREW MARANTZ WRITES:

…Crain’s ran an article about SketchFactor, an app that was set to launch the next day. It would allow users to report having seen or experienced something “sketchy” in a particular location; these reports would then be geotagged and overlaid on a Google map, creating a sketchiness heat map of a neighborhood or city. The idea was to help urban walkers be more street-smart, but the implications seemed insensitive at best, racist at worst. Allison McGuire, the app’s co-creator, had recently moved from Washington, D.C., to the West Village. Both she and her co-founder, Daniel Herrington, were white and in their twenties. At one point, the Crain’s reporter asked McGuire whether her company “could be vulnerable to criticisms regarding the degree to which race is used to profile a neighborhood.”

Posted in Race | Comments Off on What to Do When Your App Is Racist

Diversity Destroys Trust

From Chateau Heartiste: Mass non-white immigration to white countries erodes social trust, which decreases the support for wealth redistribution to groups of swarthies who act and look very differently than your friends and family, hence increased “economic freedom”.

Related: A reader forwards this ROK piece by Roosh:

The Western elite, especially in Europe, got into power by pushing peace, harmony, equal opportunity, and multiculturalism, but beneath these feel-good concepts includes the blueprint for destruction of the very force that threatens their power: nationalism. Introducing massive numbers of Muslims, Mexicans, or destitute Somalian refugees into your nation reduces the likelihood that you will look to your neighbor and see someone like you, a brother-in-arms who can help you rise up against the cyclical inevitability of a corrupt government ruling over you.

Now that you see a dozen different colors surrounding you on the subway and in the Starbucks, some of whom are looking at you suspiciously, you feel distrustful of these outsiders because they have a different background and belief system than you do. You find yourself in a diluted world culture with standardized gadgets, entertainment, and government-friendly talking points conveniently disseminated by all media outlets. Now instead of looking to your neighbor to help fight against governmental oppression, you will seek comfort in your own amusements, Facebook feeds, internet memes, and legalized marijuana. You turn inwards to satisfy your hedonistic needs while allowing the government to run over your rights and push policies that you feel increasingly helpless to fight in your social isolation.

This is all done by design. The liberal governments of the West will allow the collateral damage of terrorist acts because they need those immigrants to defeat the greater threat to their power: national identity. Destroy the culture and you remove a citizen’s motivation to fight for a nation he would have given his life for not three generation ago. Immigration must not stop because the liberal elite must maintain their power, and the useful idiots in the media and academia will continue spinning the narrative required to ensure that happens. The death of twelve lives or 1,200 is inconsequential.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on Diversity Destroys Trust

Mattress Girl Made A Porno

Chateau Heartiste: This is a Nimitz Class Attention Whore (and Control Freak; she wants to shove her smelly snatch in men’s faces and sadistically deny their male sexuality by demanding their desexualized consideration). And there’s no doubt she’s the type of chick (there are an uncomfortably large number of them) who gets off dreaming about a rapist having his way with her.

In the past, attention whores of this magnitude would violate only a handful of people’s lives… those closest to them. And they would be discarded once their friends and family caught on to their sickness and gave up showering them with the sympathetic ardor they crave. We see with the rise of the internet and social media that the insufferable attention whore has a new lease on her vampiric, emotion-sucking malevolence. The online world has enabled her like no BFF or doting mother could; it has not created a monster, but turned a monster into a contagion, devouring cultures whole.

Posted in Feminism | Comments Off on Mattress Girl Made A Porno

How Men And Women Treat Those With Low SMV (Sexual Market Value)

From Reddit Redpill:

* Look at the language different genders use for those they find unattractive.

If a man sees a woman with low SMV, he will only judge her on a skin deep level. Ugly, butterface, small tits, fatass, etc. Since we don’t find women sexually attractive because of their personality, being unattractive does not make them a bad person to us. We won’t call an ugly woman a creep, we won’t call a woman with small breasts pathetic. They may become invisible to us, but there is no real inner hatred for them.

But a woman? When a woman sees a man with low SMV, it’s personal. Creep, loser, pathetic. These are all words flung around by even the sweetest of women at men they find unattractive. Since women are attracted to what to more than just surface level physical attraction, an unattractive man isn’t just ugly, fat, or any of that. He’s a bad person. This is why it’s so easy for women to treat low SMV men like shit, to manipulate and despise them. Low SMV men aren’t just unattractive or invisible, they’re dirt.

Feminists may say this is what they want, to be judged for their actions and personality rather than on a purely physical level. However, once again, the watch what she does and not what she says principle applies. Why? Because there is one thing men do that absolutely infuriates women. Slut shaming. This is a direct attack on women’s character for actions they’ve done in the past, and they can’t stand it. Once again proving that women want all the good things about being a man with absolutely none of the negatives.

* The mere presence of a low SMV man is not offensive to women, because low-SMV men are literally invisible to women; they literally do not even see an invisible low SMV man…

…until he hits on her. Then, that is when his presence becomes “offensive”. And it is “offensive”, because it forces a woman to perform self-introspection; i.e., she begins thinking to herself, “is this the caliber of man I attract?” “Am I putting on weight?” “Did I put on my makeup this morning?”

She starts looking at a low-SMV man hitting on her as an affront to her own SMV. So in order to avoid taking agency for her own self, she projects those disgusting feelings onto the low-SMV man hitting on her. He’s a bad person because he made her feel like a low SMV girl.

* It’s biological; this argument is extremely simplistic, but a natural represents good DNA. Good, masculine looks and a healthy upbringing led him to be confident as a kid, which led him to make friends and be a leader of his friend group, and his positive behaviors were reinforced and got him attention. He was always one of the cooler kids, so he never had problems getting a girl, so he developed confidence with women as a result of always being able to have someone around due to his physical and social value. He’s not necessarily “good DNA”, but chances are, the golden boy natural playboy statistically represents better, stronger DNA as well as ability to provide for that DNA.

The guy who was a loser, say he naturally was weak, spindly, and bullied (aka physically inferior to other guys), developed loser habits, like extreme self consciousness, aversion to risk taking, fear of confrontation, etc. Even though someone with perfectly robust DNA could wind up in this situation, in our primitive minds, we know it’s statistically likely that the guy who’s a loser has bad “nature” as well as bad “nurture”. Being low SMV is fine; you get ID’d as suboptimal DNA. When you improve your SMV, you are walking shit-tier DNA that is wearing the clothes of superior DNA.

You are essentially the most risky trap a woman can fall on, something that in caveman times would endanger her life, and more importantly, her lineage. Old aversions do not die, even though times have changed to the point where plenty of people with poor DNA are naturals and people with good DNA are losers. The loser who improves is odious to her subconscious not because he himself is repulsive or immoral, but because he actually threatens her biological function (to get the best genes she can get).

When you make it to the top, torch your past. Burn all your old pics, nuke your social media. Your climb means everything to you, but to women, it’s a “L” branded onto your forehead.

* If you want to get a real, possibly painful, introduction to your SMV, then take a job in a public environment with a steady stream of new college girls forced to interact with you. This happened to me about 3 years ago and its been brutal. All my life I had experienced the quick eye lock, look away maneuver from pretty girls. But when you work in a cubicle or construction site, you don’t have to own it everyday. Once it starts happening several times a day, you either change for the better, or wilt. Actually one of the best things that’s happened to me in several years.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on How Men And Women Treat Those With Low SMV (Sexual Market Value)