If you found your bedroom filled with poisonous snakes, who would you hate? The snakes or the people who put them there? The Jewish groups in the following story want to fill your community with poisonous snakes. From many a non-Muslim perspective in the West, Muslim immigrants in your country are poison, just as from a Muslim perspective, the Jewish state of Israel is a poison in their midst and no churches or synagogues can be allowed in Saudi Arabia (and non-Muslims have to be segregated).
The friends of my enemies are my enemies. How do Arabs and Muslims feel about their fellow Arabs and Muslims who praise the beauty of the Jewish state of Israel? I suspect that normal Arabs and Muslims would rightly think of them as traitors. How many Arab and Muslim groups are there protesting hatred against the Jewish state of Israel?
For more than 200 years, Jews in the West have consistently sided with the coalition of the fringe against the white Christian core. You rarely find large numbers of Jews in any movement that seeks to strengthen the white Christian core against the fringe.
There is nothing in Torah that mandates how Jews should rally on behalf of other minorities. The Torah is strangely silent on civil rights legislation in gentile countries. The Torah is strangely silent about the great evils of Islamophobia, homophobia, lookism, sexism, bigotry and discrimination. The Jews who are most passionate about such things are the least Jewish, while Jews who are the most Jewish (traditional orthodox Jews) do not care about civil rights and usually vote right-wing.
Many, perhaps most Orthodox Jews in America, would be glad if all the Muslims and blacks around them disappeared. Most Jews wish that all Palestinians disappear.
A lot of Jews tell me that I am the only person they know who loves Donald Trump.
A dozen American organizations team up to support legislation thwarting proposed ban on Muslims entering the US.
From a bid to overcome resistance to building a mosque in New Jersey to defending a Muslim student at a military academy who wants to wear a hijab, Jewish groups this week joined efforts to stop anti-Muslim discrimination.
Nearly a dozen Jewish groups are also backing legislation against banning entry to Muslims, prompted by a proposal for such a ban by presidential candidate Donald Trump.
The American Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists joined the Becket Fund, a conservative group that advocates for religious liberty, in a friend of the court brief filed Wednesday on behalf of Muslims who have been blocked from building a mosque in Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Another of the groups backing the Muslim community in the mosque case is the Interfaith Coalition on Mosques, a group convened in 2010 by the Anti-Defamation League to support Muslim communities seeking to build mosques. “The Islamic Society of Basking Ridge was held to a different standard than every other house of worship in the community, and that is simply unacceptable,” Joshua Cohen, ADL’s regional director, said in a statement.
Also Wednesday, the American Jewish Committee called on The Citadel, a military college in South Carolina, to allow a Muslim student to wear a hijab.
The college president, Lt. Gen. John Rosa, said that deviations from the school’s uniform could detract from leadership training, the Washington Post reported Wednesday, adding that the college otherwise remains committed to diversity.
“The Citadel should reverse its hijab ban as part of its commitment to preparing its students for leadership positions in military service and civilian careers,” Robert Silverman, AJC’s director of Muslim-Jewish relations, said in a statement.
The statement noted that Jewish groups, including the AJC, backed legislation passed in 1988 that allowed servicemen to wear religious garb based on litigation brought in the 1980s by a Jewish Air Force officer who wanted to wear a kippah.
Separately, more than 70 members of the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday introduced legislation that would prohibit religion as a criterion for banning entry to visitors, immigrants or refugees.
Broadsides against Muslims by Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, and other Republican candidates sparked the legislation.
The legislation is backed by at least 11 Jewish groups, including umbrella bodies for the Reform, Conservative and Reconstructionist movements and the public policy umbrella, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, among the more than 30 faith groups that have expressed support for it.
COMMENTS SECTION:
* Shouldn’t these Jew Socialists be focused on helping indigent Jewish elderly in Brooklyn and donating to Maimonides Hospital?
* Jewish groups should stick to discussing Judaism and fighting for the Jewish people. They should quit pretending Islam is the same as Judaism, and actually learn about the doctrines of the Koran which teaches that the Jews are the most corrupt and worst enemies of the true believers, i.e., Muslims. Jewish groups should be confronting Islamic Jew hatred, not foolishly fighting for Islam.
* These self hating Jews should unite to protect Israelis, fellow Jews, Christians, and any non Muslims from Muslim discrimination, It seems to me that Muslims do most of the killing and discriminating in this world. They also do the most whining about being discriminated against.
* Yet no Jews are allowed in any Arab country…where are the muslims protesting that…Liberal Jews are lost in space.
* Sorry liberal jewish groups – but you do NOT have my support or that of many others involved in the mideast conflict. Muslims are NOT welcome in the West and neither I nor anyone else I know support them until they learn how to act like civilized humans on many fronts, including the acceptance of the rights of non-muslims, treatment of non-muslims in the mideast as equals, acceptance of Israel, etc.
Posted inIslam, Jews|Comments Off on JTA: Jewish groups unite to defend Muslims from discrimination
The number of black kids in the schools I went to (prior to college, and even then it was never more than about 5% at UCLA in 1988-1989) was never more than about 2%.
One of the marks of Orthodox Jews is that more than 90% of them send their kids to Orthodox Jewish schools.
In ninth grade, I had a two-hour commute to and from school. It was miserable and the worst school year of my life. I had hives every night. I failed two classes (Spanish, Algebra) my first semester at Forest Lake Christian School. Then I transferred to Placer High School so I could take journalism classes and my grades improved to better than a B average (without taking any honors courses).
I’ve mentioned many times that, in my experience growing up in Los Angeles’s San Fernando Valley in the 1960s and 1970s, white flight from the public schools was pretty much Jewish flight. It can be dated fairly precisely to 1978 to avoid integration due to the mandatory school busing imposed by an ACLU lawsuit on the giant Los Angeles Unified School District.
Why? Back then, Catholics tended to go to Catholic schools, and Protestants lived in independent school districts like Pasadena, San Marino, and in Orange County.
Moreover, San Fernando Valley Jews were highly enthusiastic about public schooling. One of my older memories is hearing from my Jewish teammates on my baseball team at the local park that Catholic schools were kind of un-American. Jews went to public schools to demonstrate their commitment to civic Americanism.
But then, very quickly, they stopped.
Yet that massive historical example that happened 38 years ago at the heart of the world capital of the entertainment industry has largely been lost in the mists of time. Thus, when 27-year-old Atlantic interns denounce all those horrible white people who white flighted away from integrated schools, they tend to picture evil white Southerners who were probably secret Klansmen, meatheaded Catholic ethnics, and snobby WASPs who wouldn’t let their great-grandfathers into their anti-Semitic country clubs, but they don’t picture people much like themselves.
So, I figured I’d better post a rare 21st Century article documenting that I’m not just hallucinating all this history. From the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles seven years ago:
With the many LAUSD schools having spotty reputations, and given the array of private schools to choose from, Jewish support for Los Angeles public schools in recent years has been at best tepid. But that wasn’t always the case.
Jews in L.A. have had a long and textured relationship with the public education system. From the 1890s, when the city first established elementary and high school districts, through to the 1960s, public education was a mainstay of the Jewish community.
But when school demographics began to shift as working class Latino and African American populations burgeoned, many Jewish families pulled out of public schools and migrated to the private realm.
The Jewish exodus from LAUSD reached its peak during the desegregation movement of the 1970s. After the ACLU filed a lawsuit in 1963 to end segregation in L.A. schools, the LAUSD board created voluntary integration programs, introducing magnet schools and giving district schools the option of busing students from lower-performing facilities to higher performing schools. In 1976, the California Supreme Court charged state school districts with enforcing integration. In response, two years later the L.A. school board began a sweeping mandatory busing program that would reassign more than 60,000 students, transferring minority children from downtown and South L.A. to predominantly white schools in the San Fernando Valley and the Westside, and vice versa.
This was a particularly nuts example of the high tide of liberal social engineering since it involved busing kids from the San Fernando Valley over a mountain range — the Santa Monica Mts. / Hollywood Hills — and down to South-Central L.A.
Students often were bused up to an hour away from where they lived, and the move caused a public outcry among both whites and minorities over what many parents saw as “the end of neighborhood schools,” according to former LAUSD school board member David Tokofsky. Racist and classist prejudices also turned some white families away.
In the first year of forced busing, the district lost 25,000 white students, recalled Shel Erlich, the former longtime head of the LAUSD communications office. In the second year, an additional 17,000 left. In 1981, after only three years, California residents voted down all mandatory busing programs and the plan in Los Angeles was suspended.
But the damage had been done – in the late 1970s, Erlich said, the district was about 30 percent white; now, that number hovers below nine percent.
“[Busing] drove a huge number of Jews from the public schools,” said local author and Jewish Journal columnist Bill Boyarsky. “Parents were not comfortable sending their children to a school where their kid might be the only white person in the class.”
Jewish leaders had taken both sides of the busing debate. Educator Jackie Goldberg, who would later win seats on the Los Angeles City Council and the California State Assembly, headed the controversial Integration Project in the late 1970s that pushed for mandatory busing. Activist and later U.S. Congresswoman Bobbi Fiedler, on the other hand, led the vocal Bustop movement in the Valley that fiercely opposed busing and challenged the program in court.
… Private schools flourished; Jewish day schools proliferated in the 1970s and 80s.
So, I wanted to get this on the record because it’s otherwise disappeared down the Memory Hole.
Thus, when the young lady from The Atlantic reads Matthew Weiner, creator of Mad Men, going on and on in interviews about how he could tell there were anti-Semites lurking everywhere in 1981 at ultra-exclusive Harvard-Westlake in the Hollywood Hills (which was then 40% Jewish), she feels a righteous thrill. Meanwhile, it never occurs to her to wonder why Weiner’s parents were paying for him to attend an exclusive school founded by Episcopalians, when just a few years before they would have thought it right and fitting to utilize Los Angeles’s fine public school system. The young lady from The Atlantic could empathize more with the creator of Mad Men more than she can empathize with the Klansmen, Catholic ignoramuses, and the WASP anti-Semite golfers for whom she blames the failure of school integration, but she’s almost never called upon to wonder why Weiner’s Hancock Park parents put him in private school.
It just doesn’t come up. Why would anybody who is professionally interested in the history of white flight from the public schools ever think about something as obscure as America’s second largest school district, which happens to be in the second most televised place in America?
By the way, one of the funnier interviews with Weiner was conducted by David Samuels, who is now being widely denounced by the members of the Obama Administration media echo chamber for inducing Obama speechwriter Ben Rhodes to spill his guts a little too frankly for the Administration’s good.
But Samuels does this to everybody, especially fellow Jews: he’s supersmart about getting inside his subject’s head and getting him to talk about his motivations that he normally keeps under wraps.
COMMENTS:
* Investment tip: buy within walking distance of an Orthodox or Sephardic temple for a steady stream of buyers.
* Diversity is fine when it occurs naturally and with the consent of all parties. Forced, artificial diversity is not “enriching,” it’s insane.
* Still, these posts by Steve are worthwhile. They just might help remind people in the megaphone media that this is a two-way conversation now and they might want to dial down their gas-lighting game. Fifty years of unrelenting guilt-tripping and taunting can get on the collective nerves of others.
* Jews are considered white when doing so helps Jews, and nonwhites when doing so helps Jews. When Jews do things that are not kosher under societal mores (like fleeing areas flooded with undesirable ethnic groups) it’s called “white flight.” Yet Jews simultaneously hold up the Holocaust narrative as The Worst Thing In Human History and use it as the primary excuse for undermining most non-Israeli nationalism.
* Rapper Ice Cube of N.W.A. was bussed from South Central to attend high school more than an hour away in Woodland Hills. Interestingly, Woodland Hills educated Ice Cube left NWA to unleash a series of controversial, anti-Semitic tracks. Ice Cube brought us The Predator album so there were some good things to come out of LA bussing.
* I heard a white guy tell about his experiences with being bused in grade school back in the early 70s. Every year he was sent to a different one, and he always had to deal with being the new kid in class, the outsider. Every year he was torn away from the few friends he’d made the previous year. He soon quit making friends at all because he figured out he’d never be allowed to keep them.
It was the sort of environment where a blazing extrovert might have thrived, but he wasn’t an extrovert, and he says he found it traumatic. He wanted stability, not to be someone else’s social experiment. He said he doubted he added much of any value to the lives of the black kids whose schools he was sent to, and the busing didn’t do him any good, either.
* I think anyone who thinks White America is going to wake up and fight back, should take a long look at Busing in the 1970s and 1980s.
Almost no one ever voted for Busing. It was imposed on people by the courts and the bureaucracy. The Civil rights bill was supposed to ban government mandated segregation, not require Government enforced desegregation across entire school districts.
Reagan campaigned against it, but the republicans would never pass a bill against it. Howard Metzenbaum would get up and say “I’ll filibuster any anti-busing bill” and the Senator majority leader Dole/Baker would go “sorry, we just can’t pass a bill”. And that was that.
And people just took it. Most of them, instead of getting mad and fighting, just ran away. Or as Steve wrote put their kids in private school. In effect paying for their kids education twice, once thru taxes, then thru private school fees.
And this was in the 1970s-1980s when supposedly the country was more “racist” and “right-wing”.
* That’s a very sad story. For $50 I’ll write the screenplay and we can shop it to Hollywood. From experience though I doubt they’ll be interested.
The better Screenplay would be the story of a disadvantaged minority, say a black kid, who was uplifted by a magnanimous benefactor, say a Jew, who took it upon himself to fight the good fight against WASPy gentiles who stood in the way of this good looking, gifted disadvantaged minority kid.
At this point in story developent we should take a look at casting. I have Dustin Hoffman in mind for the beneficient Yidden and Denzel Washington for the disadvantaged minority boy’s father.
Let’s put the backdrop as contemporary Fergusson Mo or a fictionalized variant. We’ll have a NYT reporter covering the unrest and assuredly signaling virtue to the utmost. This is the angle we’ll use: the story will be told amidst the chaos of BLM with a Charles Blow-type homosexual NYT reporter narrating the unfolding drama.
I work cheap, contact me for the screenplay, I can have it done tonight. We’ll make millions.
* >>>Jewish leaders had taken both sides of the busing debate. Educator Jackie Goldberg, who would later win seats on the Los Angeles City Council and the California State Assembly, headed the controversial Integration Project in the late 1970s that pushed for mandatory busing.
From Wikipedia: “Goldberg is openly lesbian[1] and was a founder member of the California Legislative LGBT Caucus. She is one of three openly gay and Jewish members with Carol Migden, and Mark Leno.”
Not surprised. Radical, Jewish, lesbian with no skin in the game heads the “controversial” project.
* I can tell you from personal experience that being a White-Jewish kid in one of these minority schools really sucks. You get the usual bullying from Black and Hispanic kids, while also receiving ostracism from your fellow Jews cause your parents actually sent you to one of these “ghetto” schools. Unsurprisingly, many of fellow Jews went on to become liberal zealots (a few of them work for groups like the ACLU) while I eventually became an admirer of Pat Buchanan and Paul Gottfried. The Cossacks no longer matter to me…
* I lived for a few years in a city where the local high school was heavily black, but there was an honors program created to keep white kids from fleeing the school entirely. There was a far left Jewish family across the street from us. The dad was (literally) a card-carrying ACLU member. His son got kicked out of the honors program. Instead of going to classes at the same high school with the normal (i.e., mostly black) students, the kid somehow transferred to the neighboring high school which (coincidentally!) was about 95% white.
* I wonder how many white people have lost long-term friendships with black people over what I’d call “the interpersonal ferguson effect,” which could basically be described as the white guy not buying the old-timey black narrative of victimization.
I’m white, and I had to cut one loose lately. I got tired of the old-timey neglected negro narrative. He clung to it like a religion, even though he’s had a pretty successful life, thanks to white folks, and never lifted a finger to help black folks. He’s of the “I got mine, let them get theirs” school of ignoring the people he likes to defend almost unconditionally. His town is all white, as is his significant other, and he loves it. But let him see “12 years a slave” and he turns into Samuel Jackson on a bad day. Just bizarre.
* Ze’ev Chafets wrote about Jewish flight from his native Pontiac and other parts of metro Detroit in Devil’s Night. Most moved nearby. The author moved to Jerusalem. Now that’s flight.
* Robert Weissberg nails it:
If you looked around our cultural landscape and tried to find two groups with different values that venerate different things, who worship at different altars, it is hard to find two groups more different than blacks and Jews. Jews are obsessed with education, blacks destroy it. If you’ve gone to school in the inner city, you know that not only do they hate the idea of learning, but they assault their teachers and physically destroy their schools.
When blacks move into a neighborhood, the first people out are Jews. Jews did not invent white flight but we perfected it. As far as intermarriage and social exchange, there’s almost zero. They just don’t mix. Jews are not into crime. The sorts of things that blacks specialize in — muggings, assaults, rapes — are not a Jewish predilection.
How Jews really relate to blacks is something Jews hardly talked about except when they are amongst themselves. When Jews get together in a safe place and talk about blacks, they will use the term “schvartze.” When you go to Leo Rosten’s Joys of Yiddish, he’s very careful in what he says. With “schvartze”, he becomes tight-lipped. “A black person, a negro.” That does not begin to depict what the term means among Jews. There may be a degree of affection, as in, ‘I hear Mrs. Schwartz got a new schvartze.’
It is not necessarily a negative word. It’s not the same thing as nigger. If you inserted the word ‘nigger’ to achieve some lexiconic variety, Jews would be genuinely offended. There can even be a degree of affection in schvartze. As in, ‘Ahh, I heard Mrs. Schwartz got a new schvartze. Oh, how nice.’”
When you use the term ‘schvartze’, it always implies cognitive inferiority. The mental picture of a stupid black embedded in the term schvartze is true even with pro-civil rights [liberal] Jews… Adding the phrase ‘dumb schvartze’ is superflous, reserved only used for the most egregious stupidity. Invisible baggage likewise includes gullibility, emotional excitability, and a weakness for here-and-now conspicuous consumption. Violence, especially inter-personal, alcohol-induced mayhem, is also associated with schvartze. The image that comes to the mind with Jews when you say ‘schvartze’ is simple-minded, impulsive, easily seduced by trinkets. This is extremely close to the traditional Southern image of blacks, almost identical to what many Southerners would privately say about blacks… This is continually reinforced by daily experience, such as in integrated public schools.
We had a procession of cleaning ladies [in New York]. Growing up, I honestly believed that all black people come from a thing called The Agency. We’d hire black cleaning ladies and invariably they’d steal and drink the liquor and my mother would come back and say, ‘I’m calling up The Agency and getting another.’ Very few Jews of my generation had any other contact. We had a procession of handymen and cleaning people come to my house.
It was always believed that any Jew can ultimately out-smart any schvartze except save being confronted by a demented gunman. Despite immense cultural chasms, Jews held themselves as innately capable of finessing blacks thanks to their superior wits, verbal talent, and a mastery of black psychology. The unmatched success of Jewish ghetto merchants and Jewish civil rights leadership positions proclaim this truth. Even today Jews may secretly brag about their success in beguiling blacks in contentious interpersonal relationships. People sometimes ask me, ‘What did you do when they showed up as a demonstration to your office?’ This happened to me one time. A bunch of angry young blacks came to my office… I said, ‘I just relied on the wisdom of my ancestors. I gave them a little rope-a-dope. I moved around. I said this, I said that. Within half an hour, they were fine. I sold one a suit and several new jewelry and they were happy. They got a deal from Mr. Weissberg.’
Where personal manipulation might fail, the storehouse of survival tactics sufficed exceedingly well. Black pathologies were bearable, especially since most black mayhem was self-inflicted. Jews might even profit from these disorders as merchants or nanny state therapists. Threatened Jews can flee deteriorating neighborhoods, enroll their children in private schools, hire security guards, co-opt black leaders financially, or otherwise escape.
Jews see no conflict between righteously defending black criminals as political prisoners and living in fortress-style buildings.
On the one hand, Jews dread blacks physically. When Jews see blacks walking down the street, they feel tremendous fear. Yet they dutifully pay the danegeld (extortion money).
For most Jews, it is the white goyim who pose the most threat. Contrary fact-based argument fall on deaf ears. Like the schvartzes, the Chinese [and Japanese] are never called goyim.
Blacks are incapable of such well-organized horror [as the Holocaust] unless directed by nefarious whites… A full-scale pogrom is beyond their capacity. Can you imagine blacks systemically rounding up thousands of Jews or even keeping tabs on Jewish neighborhoods? Assess enemies by capabilities, not intentions… The schvartze pose minimal risk. They’re too stupid.
* MORE: Some people seem to think that being Jewish is somehow different than being white, in a racial sense anyways. Do those idiots think that blacks somehow perceive a Jew as being different than a white person? No they don’t. Most Jews are caucasian, yeah they have some distant Middle Eastern origins but most Jews of today have resided in Europe for millennia and are nearly genetically identical to most white Europeans, as far as blacks are concerned they have white skin and practicing the Jewish religion doesn’t exempt them from black racist violence. Jews know that and that’s why they leave when there are too many negroes.
* …the entire point of busing wasn’t “racial equality.” It was to deploy political means to destroy white communities and (heterosexual, male-centered) families. The latter obviously involved removing the locus of familial authority from the male and the home to the state and its female lesbian autocrats. A process that continues, on steroids, to this day.
* The forced integration of schools nationwide was the result of court cases initiated by the American Civil Liberties Union ACLU) which had been under Jewish control since its original gentile founders (Roger Baldwin et.al.) had been purged for opposition to the growing influence of the Communist Party in the organization in the early 1940s.. What occurred in San Francisco in particular during this era of busing is both curious and illustrative . The Jews who pushed for integration through groups like the ACLU must have somehow thought (or known) that they would be excluded from it once it came into effect.
San Francisco, up to the period of this busing, had had three academic high schools: Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, and Lowell. For decades all of these three schools had produced thousands students who were accepted at all sorts of high level universities including places like the Ivy leagues and Stanford. Lowell, one of the three high schools, was a magnet for one particular type of student , Jewish. It was so heavily Jewish that I know of someone who transferred out of Lowell to Lincoln High School in the late 1950s specifically because he claimed that his social life was being curtailed the many Jewish girls there wouldn’t date gentile males. (Interestingly the Jewish males were able to date the much more accepting protestant girls. ) Lowell was in effect a defacto Jewish public high school with large percentages of both Jewish students and teachers.
When busing came around a curious thing happened, It was suddenly decided without any public input that Lowell would henceforth be considered the primary high school for college bound students in the city with strict admission criteria to be instituted while Washington and Lincoln were left to accept the bused students and then be left essentially to their own devices (i.e neglected). In the following years both Lincoln and Washington ended up essentially falling apart academically and becoming more and more violent , disrupted, and ghetto like. Lincoln in particular suffered the most from this neglect. I remember seeing police cars almost constantly were circling it during school hours during this period.
This situation continued for several decades before Jews in particular started to feel the pinch of competition from an increasing number of even more academically motivated Chinese. This resulted in an increasing number of Jews who were no longer able to get into Lowell and whose parents then had to choose between the problem ridden Washington or Lincoln high schools or MUCH much more expensive private schools or (gasp) strict Catholic high schools. The recently arrived Russian Jewish emigres in particular were in a quandary because they were simply unable to pay these private school fees. What to do?
It was only then when a move was made to clean up both Lincoln and Washington High Schools.. This was done by, among other things, instituting far more advanced placement classes there, taught by much better teachers,transferring the worst of the teachers and large scale booting out the worst of the trouble makers by pushing them into the newly set up, so called “charter schools” ( the worst of which are essentially nothing more than crypto reform schools with just as active a police presence.) Lincoln and Washington have apparently finally got their full maintenance budget restored as well. So much for integration. Things have improved greatly since then but Lincoln is particular has never really overcome the problems of the past because the Chinese still hold it in such low repute because of it (very) violent past.
At the same time as the aforementioned changes in the high schools occurred another interesting event happened. With Jewish parents in the main leadership roles, the toniest neighborhood of San Francisco, Pacific Heights, tried to preserve its local public elementary school, Ulysses Grant, from busing. What was interesting was that many of these these very same, very liberal Jewish parents had been among the main financial backers of the ACLU which had pushed busing in the first place. Somehow these Jews thought they they would be spared its effects of integration while only the gentile lumpen proletariat would experience it. What hypocrisy.! These parents tried to prevent the busing of their children by using their considerable financial and political muscle and access to the best legal representation. The ultra liberal San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD). tolerated these uppity white folks for a while but then became irritated. A solution was needed.
The school district suddenly decided to bulldoze down the up-to-now beautifully maintained and stately Grant School. It was did it quickly and thoroughly leaving only a totally vacant lot after the bulldozers left. Not even the smallest remnant of a foundation remained. End of problem. The Pacific Heights students now had no choice but to go to another (thoroughly integrated) public school, right! Not quite. Virtually all of these now school-less students were transferred just as as rapidly to private or Catholic schools. Since then, the wealthiest parents in the city no longer had any vested interest in public school their interest in funding them with additional tax increases suddenly waned significantly. They still don’t send their children to public schools. Just like NYC.
Interesting note: I was driving around provincial France in the early 1980s in a rental car while staying in youth hostels and camping. In a small, remote french village I decided to camp in the local campground. The french girl behind the counter at the office counter there spoke to me in very good idiomatic English.I asked her how she had learned such good English. She replied that she had been an exchange student in the United States the previous year. I asked her where and she replied “San Francisco.” I then asked her what high school she had attended. She replied “Abraham Lincoln.” I asked her what she thought of Abraham Lincoln High School. She summed up her opinion in just four words, “It was very violent.” Nothing else was added. This was the most lasting impression she had about an American school.
World heavyweight boxing champ Tyson Fury has unleashed a foul-mouthed religious rant on video.
As he prepares for his rematch with ex-champ Wladimir Klitschko , Fury has reignited the row over some of his beliefs.
Last year he caused anger with his outspoken opinions on homosexuality, abortion and paedophilia.
And in an interview recently posted on YouTube, Fury shows no sign of having mellowed.
In the expletive-littered broadcast he takes aim at paedophiles, bisexuals, sex swap ops, and what he believes is a lack of morals in society.
He said: “It’s like you’re a freak of nature if you’re normal, you’re the odd one out nobody else.
“What’s normal? I’ll just get myself changed into a woman that’s normal isn’t it today call myself Tysina or something like that, put a wig on…”
“I don’t think it’s normal I think they’re freaks of nature.”
He also appears to be critical of Jews, saying: “Everyone just do what you can, listen to the government follow everybody like sheep, be brainwashed by all the Zionist, Jewish people who own all the banks, all the papers all the TV stations. Be brainwashed by them all.”
And he continues: “I think it’ll be perfectly normal in the next ten years to have sexual relationships with your animals at home you know your pets your cats and dogs and all that so that will be legal.
“You are already allowed to marry your animals and stuff.
“It is going to happen though, isn’t it? Whatever you can think of that’s bad, will be made legal, because that’s what the devil wants.”
Posted inBoxing|Comments Off on Chaim Amalek: How shall we destroy this man?
A reader reports: Hijabs are all over Toronto. It’s worse than the Century City mall. I hate it here. One had the full burqa, just a tiny slit for her eyes to see out, and the sun glasses over that, and a denim jacket over her long black hate dress–as if sunglasses and a denim jacket will help her blend in, make us think she’s just like us.
The boss was informed by his accounting firm that he had to update his sexual harassment policy. So he told his assistant to go around with a clip board and tell every employee that if they don’t sign to acknowledge the changes, he’ll **** them up the ***.
This ad from T-Mobile is just one example of the avalanche of miscegenation propaganda that’s been spilling out of the marketing departments of nearly every major American corporation and media organ for the past ten years, and which have been increasing in frequency tremendously since about two years ago.
Why this sudden explosion of commercial, media, and government mongrelization indoctrination?
I can think of four possible reasons why Globo-Homo oligarchies and their paid-for government shills would actively promote miscegenation as selling points for their products/programs.
Corporations have been overrun by SJW board members, executives, and managers. There are “true believers” now running major consumer and media industries, and they push miscegenation because they genuinely believe in its intrinsic value or they genuinely believe in its value as a mindfuck to ostracize and dispirit those (goyim) who aren’t autonomic cheerleaders for the muddy waters narrative.
Corporations are being heavily pressured by SJWs and Numinous Negro shock troops to be more “inclusive” and “fight White privilege”, and the corps are responding by appeasing these freaks, figuring that the small cost in a presumed tiny number of lost irate customers outweighs the larger cost of bad publicity or settling frivolous lawsuits.
Corporate boards have data which shows that miscegenation sells (to their identified market demos)! They push it cynically, to increase their bottom line, feeling no particular emotional attachment to it. If this rationale is true, then that means a growing wedge of American consumers, particularly those with discretionary cash, eat this MiscProp up. Sad!
The ol’ smoke-n-mirrors. Corporations have created a large and avaricious Miscegenation Indoctrination Machine to distract from their 1%er takeover of the American economy. Keep their natural enemies — anti-fat cat shitlibs and low disgust threshold normies — occupied with technicolor hot button agitprop so that their attention is never drawn to the Globo-Homo elites’ championing of open borders, one-way trade agreements, and outsourcing that funnels money into the hands of fewer and fewer mega-wealthy value transferers while gutting the wages of ever more native sons of America.
I don’t know which reason is the most loathsome. All four probably have some salience (I think #2 and #4 are the biggest gears in the Miscegenation Indoctrination Machine). What I do know is that it is Good and Right to call out these Masturbators of the Cuckuverse for their reptilian scheming and attempted brainwashing. The more people that see this anti-White circus for what it is — the gravest show on earth — the more likely that the malevolent purveyors of mongrelization are beaten back to the loony bins where they belong and America can be great again.
PS I object less to authentically in-love mixed couples than I do to the active propaganda by our overlords to shove it down our throats like some twisted creeper’s idea of love.
COMMENTS:
* #5. Liberals that work in marketing selling campaigns to liberals that run corporations. These liberals think they are Rosa Parks every time they put a black person over whites. They also think they can make blacks into Rosa Parks by giving them academic theories of racism and affirmative action advantages. Everyone wants to be Rosa Parks.
* Maybe they know that black male-white female couples turn heads. The first test of the effectiveness of an advertisement is if people actually look at it.
* It is an incredibly powerful way to garner attention; I have read people describe how their head swivelled when they went past such ads. Nor does its use exclude any of the other ways to garner attention you described.
I have never seen anyone else point ‘this rationalization’ out. If it is ‘well-worn’ show me another instance.
Just because we are not supposed to notice race doesn’t mean they can’t take advantage of the fact that we do and they know we do.
* I pointed this out to my teenaged sons again just yesterday when another one of these commercials came on. “Ask yourself why the white father is a pathetic object of ridicule on 95% of these shows. Ask yourself why every “personal color,” in contrast, is wise/unusually capable/the object of desire. I want you to make your judgments based on your actual experiences, boys – not based on some fantasy world that’s being pushed for some reason.”
It’s not the first time I talked to them about this. My older son replied “I know, dad. I see it everywhere. It’s everywhere. I couldn’t not notice it after you started pointing it out.”
They need to understand that they are members of the best only group it is acceptable to hate. They also know that they need to be careful about committing the “crime of noticing” when they’re vulnerable to retaliation.
* And it all starts with the SJW getting into positions of… surprise surprise, HR! They make a stink there first, threatening people with tribunals for think crimes, then it moves outward from there. Same goes for race, religion, sexual orientation stink.
Case in point: a startup company I worked for never had any policies in place. Withing few months of hiring a Pakistani software developer they had everyone take a sensitivity/harassment course, followed by a creation of meditation/prayer/nursing/relaxation room (hint: prayer!).
And don’t even get me started on what women’s presence has done to research and development departments historically filled with men of potty mouths and poor personal hygiene. Everyone is walking on eggshells now? Unless you’re working for a startup, you’re SOL and have to really watch your mouth.
* I recently had an HR recruiter in my company chastise me for dismissing applicants that did not interview well with my team due to lack of humor, not looking in the eye, etc,…
She told me I needed “diversity” and “balance” on my team. No shit, she started using those bullshit words.
The winning blow? I went to her boss and said I “felt very bullied” by her. Use the “feelz” word wherever you can, and fight back with the “bully” moniker as well.
She backed down after that.
* A few years ago, I used to think the magic neegrows on movies were put there as a way to motivate their brethren to improve themselves, but eventually I figured it out it was all propaganda against the white world.
* A few years ago an ADT commercial with a white guy breaking into a black woman’s house. I don’t think in all of human history has that ever happened. Completely unrealistic and absolutely ridiculous.
* “In other instances, curators would inject a story—even if it wasn’t being widely discussed on Facebook—because it was deemed important for making the network look like a place where people talked about hard news. “People stopped caring about Syria,” one former curator said. “[And] if it wasn’t trending on Facebook, it would make Facebook look bad.” That same curator said the Black Lives Matter movement was also injected into Facebook’s trending news module. “Facebook got a lot of pressure about not having a trending topic for Black Lives Matter,” the individual said. “They realized it was a problem, and they boosted it in the ordering. They gave it preference over other topics. When we injected it, everyone started saying, ‘Yeah, now I’m seeing it as number one’.” This particular injection is especially noteworthy because the #BlackLivesMatter movement originated on Facebook, and the ensuing media coverage of the movement often noted its powerful social media presence.”
* It’s not “the corporations,” it’s the ad agencies.
Premise 1: There’s still no good way to evaluate the effectiveness of advertising. Oh, sometimes there will be a campaign which really boosts sales (Grey Poupon, for instance), but by and large companies have an ad budget, they make ad buys, and their sales respond to . . . market conditions and random factors.
Premise 2: Given Premise 1, the Marketing Department of corporations and the ad agencies they buy from have a lot of crossover, and form a more or less self-contained community with little connection to what the corporations actually do. In other words, there’s more common culture among Exxon’s marketing department, Ben & Jerry’s marketing department, and the big ad agencies.
Premise 3: Given the first two, it’s easy to see that ads like this are virtue-signaling on the part of marketing and advertising people. Does showing mixed-race families sell product? No. Does showing mixed-race families help the careers of the people who came up with the ad? Yes.
The 1950s:
Posted inDating|Comments Off on The Miscegenation Indoctrination Machine Is Fully Functional
Mickey Kaus writes: Even apolitical owners of big, mainstream media outlets typically don’t like to bring up the immigration debate. At the very least it’s “divisive.” More important, reporting on, say, support for a border wall could alienate new, growing blocs of ethnic consumers that businesses (especially newspapers) want to reach. But it’s not easy to write long, important thumbsuckers about Trump’s primary victory without even mentioning the issue that both launched his campaign into prominence and fueled its continued rise. Luckily, America’s premier journalists are up to the job. Let’s pause to honor three of them:
— Ron Brownstein of the Atlantic numbs the mind and tests the bladder with “How Trump Rose to Power,” an extensive, tedious listing of which groups went marginally more for Trump and which didn’t, without any hint of why they went one way or another. The word “immigration” only appears in a little sidebar box giving results of poll suggesting it was Trump’s best issue, something Brownstein cleverly ignores. Whatever corporations are funding his elaborate “Next America” boondoggle project should be relieved.
A conservative economics professor and political neophyte named David Brat decided he would challenge the House Republican majority leader Eric Cantor for his Virginia congressional seat. There were few Republicans more powerful than Mr. Cantor, so Mr. Brat’s bid seemed quixotic. Mr. Cantor’s own pollster released numbers days before the election showing a 34-point lead for the congressman, and the closest public poll showed Mr. Cantor up by 13 points.
When Mr. Cantor lost, headlines labeled it an “earthquake” and a “shocker.” And it was, for people who relied solely on polls. It was less so for reporters — like Jake Sherman of Politico, Jenna Portnoy and Robert Costa of The Washington Post and the staff at Breitbart News — who went to Virginia, and talking to actual humans, picked up on the potential trouble for Mr. Cantor.
I don’t know, doesn’t that seem as if those grafs ares missing something … like the biggest issue in the race: the Gang of 8 immigration amnesty bill, denounced by Brat’s supporters — an issue Cantor tried desperately to defuse? But really, there’s no need to mention substance when we can focus on the process. We all have to ask ourselves the question: What would Facebook do? … P.S.: Rutenberg also perpetuates the bogus idea that everyone failed to anticipate Trump’s success: “Wrong, wrong, wrong — to the very end, we got it wrong.” What you mean, “we” …? Lots of people (mainly people who recognized the power of the immigration issue) got it right.
— Howard Kurtz of Fox dashes off a piece on Trump and the “working-class Americans who helped power [his] bid” without mentoning you know what. Of course, “Trump’s appeal to [working class] voters is often described in economic terms,” he notes. But who wants to spend time discussing that (e.g. the waves of immigrants who are plausibly said to have lowered their wages)? The culural aspect is much more interesting! They’re sick of being told to ‘check their privilege’ by Ivy Leaguers, for example.
So who’s the winner of the Omerta Olympics? I’d have to give it to Rutenberg. Kurtz and Brownstein have bosses to please. But Rutenberg’s still in the honeymoon period of his new job; he could have gotten away with a little disruption. Instead, he played it safe, issuing a stirring plea for more “on-the-ground reporting.” (If only they’d sent some reporters to New Hampshire.)
P.S.: Additional nominations accepted. …
P.P.S.: New York‘s Jonathan Chait, like Rutenberg, sets out to explain why “almost everyone” failed to predict Trump’s win. His conclusion: “The Republican Party turns out to be filled with idiots” — e.g. voters who unexpectedly didn’t see through Trump the way, say, Jonathan Chait sees through Trump. Never mind that this isn’t so much an explanation as a restatement of the problem — it’s Chait’s job, after all, to anticipate the behavior of voters whether it’s idiotic or not. Why did they so disappoint him and confound his expectations? It’s a mystery–since Chait doesn’t mention immigration either. …
* None of this indicates that it’s nurture. People with good work ethics and the drive to be successful in any field are generally going to have good genetics, which means they will come from relatively wealthy two-parent homes.
A lot of times, nature and nurture are conflated. That’s why you need to rely on behavioral genetics for your priors before interpreting this kind of data.
To be the best at something requires an innate desire to master it, and I’m really doubtful that parents can instill that given all the research that shows parenting has no effect of anything (see Jayman blog at the side of your screen). Football practice takes a lot of time and energy, and if your 6 foot tall, 180 pound son doesn’t want to do it, he’s not going to.
* If being drafted into the NFL as a QB were not highly dependent on nurture, why would football practice require so much effort?
Steve’s point, I take it, isn’t that being 6 foot 5, strong, with a great arm and a quick mind, isn’t genetic, or that it doesn’t help you get drafted. The point is that, as people compete more and more to develop the particular skills needed for QB, nature will begin to recede in relative importance compared to nurture.
* “Practice” does not mean “nurture.” Your work ethic is genetic, as are your tastes. If environment matters, it’s that kids want to be quarterback to get chicks and be the coolest guy in school, not because of anything their dad did.
Evolution tells us you seek status outside the home, not try to impress the people you live with.
* So Malcolm Gladwell is right – 20,000 hours of practice turns anyone who performs the practice into an expert? – even if quarterback aspirants are short in height and have small mitts?
I don’t think “nurtured” is the right word here. The right words are two: selected for physical requirements and groomed.
And are the quarterback parents “tiger” parents for their intensive grooming of their sons to become proficient quarterbacks?
* I think it’s hard for sports fans — indeed for most of us — to keep in mind just how outrageously talented pro athletes such as NFL quarterbacks really are. They are the standouts who have been selected from an already-elite group of standouts (college QBs) who have been selected from a group of standouts (high school QBs) who were usually so obviously the best players on the field that even the school librarian could pick them out.
In this sense, the ‘nurture’ of an athletically-average boy, no matter how intensive, is going to fall so far short of him being an NFL QB that it’s not even laughable. It just doesn’t happen.
One reasons the position of NFL QB is so endlessly fascinating, I think, is that it’s so incredibly difficult to excel that even armchair QBs like us can see at a glance when a spectacularly-talented actual NFL QB is deficient: missed passes, misreadings of coverage schemes, getting panicky in a disintegrating pocket and throwing a pick — there’s just so much that can go wrong that it’s easy for even casual fans to pile on joyfully in dissecting a ‘poor’ QB’s performance.
* I don’t think you quite grasp the nature of quarterbacking. Minute technical details in footwork and throwing form are huge. That is what the specialized instruction provides. A critique from an expert.
And once you get that knowledge/advice, everything snowballs. Your own practice (with dad) becomes more fruitful. You get the starting job, so more attention from team coaches, reps in practice, and game time experience.
The other skill set essential for a QB is mental. Reading the defense pre-snap, quick decision-making, and anticipation. These aspects seem like they might be tougher to teach, but getting repetition has to help. The 7 v 7 leagues or camps, played in over summers, are basically all passing. The lack of lineman reduces the fog of war providing opportunity to “put it all together”.
* Coaching makes a big difference:
* Kickers and punters are more extreme cases of this phenomenon. There was an article maybe 2-3 years ago that analyzed how recruiting high school kickers/punters to colleges works and the gist was that the top kids have parents who send them to expensive kicking coaches and camps that get them on the radar with scouts for college programs. In an interview with a head coach (who was made to seem representative), he admitted to having no idea how to evaluate kickers and punters, so all of that work was outsourced to professional camps and the kicking gurus who run them. I don’t recall a discussion of relative affluence among the recruits, but it would seem reasonable to expect it to be pretty high. My biggest takeaway from the article was that if I ever have a son my goal is going to be for him to kick for a team like Vanderbilt or Northwestern so that I won’t have to pay his tuition.
* I’ve noticed that blacks dominate free school-based sports that have a strong development system that requires little to no involvement from the parents. The ethnic background of a black athlete’s mother seems to be a major factor in whether or not they will be successful in a sport that requires heavy parental involvement.
Major League Baseball is about 8 percent non-Hispanic black and 2015 was considered a good draft year for blacks. Five of the top nine black players drafted had a non-black mother.
On Wikipedia’s list of black NHL players, about 80 percent of players with an identified ethnicity are bi-racial, the other 20 percent are mostly Caribbean. There is even a Nigerian. Seth Jones, son of NBA’s Popeye Jones, has a white mother.
In regards to outlying black quarterbacks in the story, Jacoby Brissett had Bill Parcells as a mentor. Cardale Jones caught the eye of the high school coach at age 8, had a guardian, and after graduating high school attended Fork Union Military Academy to become academically eligible for college, on scholarship I assume. Coincidentally, Christian Hackenberg, who had involved parents, spent his four years of high school at Fork Union.
* If you listen to the “Move the Sticks” podcast with Daniel Jeremiah and Bucky Brooks, frequent guest coach Brian Billick notes that there are not 32 men on the earth with the talent to play NFL QB. And that size and arm strength while important are not the determining factors (though hosts Jeremiah and Brooks, long time scouts, disagree).
Billick has argued at length past season in multiple appearances that the mental ability to read and pick apart a stout defense under pressure with “enough” arm strength and accuracy are the most important attributes for a QB. Not size and strength. The late Bill Walsh once ran a coaching session with Phil Simms. Simms relates that he was trying to impress Walsh by putting mustard on the ball, and Walsh irately told him to soften the throw, so that the receiver could catch it easily, but put it in a box that meant that only the receiver, and not any defender, could catch it.
Every team would like an Andrew Luck as QB. But the Saints won a Superbowl with a short QB, as did the Seahawks, as did the Montana led 49ers, and Favre led Packers. Heck Peyton Manning was not exactly mobile but managed the game enough to beat all-Universe Cam Newton’s superior arm and mobility (but inferior reads and pass rush management).
Even in the NFL, shortage of talent at the larger heights will allow the Wilsons and Brees to compete. Billick is right — look at last year’s roster and see how many low performing QBs there were, despite having all the right “tools.”
Posted inFootball|Comments Off on ESPN: How NFL Quarterbacks Are Nurtured
* For me, going to paralegal school was the first of a series of several bad decisions that I made.
* The job market for paralegals is, and has been, terrible. Paralegals have lost their jobs. Paralegal work has been farmed out. Clients are becoming more strict by the day as to what they’ll pay for. The jobs are simply not there.
* I called the local paralegal school in my area. The program costs $12,580 if you come in with your general ed done, almost $26k (!!) if you start from scratch. My work always get faxes from this school, a profile of some of their recent grads and their skills and the pay they are seeking – $12-$15/hr. That’s a hellofalot of tuition to pay for such low wages.
To exacerbate all the above, being a paralegal or legal secretary is probably one of the worst jobs out there. The lack of advancement opportunity, but more importantly the hostile environment and abuse make it so not worth it even if the pay were decent.
* Why didn’t you simply go to your local college/university or junior college instead of a proprietary college? They’re WAY cheaper and often carry ABA accreditation as well. Here in Richmond, VA, we have a major university + a community college program, as well as 2 proprietary programs. Only 1, the community college program, is ABA accredited and costs WAY less than any of the other.
* I went to a proprietary paralegal school. You had to already have a bachelors degree to get into the program. It cost $7500 and took 5 months. I got the paralegal certificate 15 years after my bachelors degree. There would have been no point to go to a “real” college because I already had a college degree and it would have taken a lot longer. My bachelors degree cost, I don’t know, at least $50,000 (1980s). The paralegal school I went to was ABA approved.
The certificate led to an entry level career oriented position. I have been in the field 10 years. I don’t find the office abusive at all. It can be challenging. It’s hard trying to always produce perfect flawless work.
Half my paralegal class never found a job working as a paralegal.
* My experience is paralegals spend more time working with clients than attorneys. Paralegals are more accessible to clients than attorneys. But, ultimately, attorneys get all the credit and glory. I think that’s because, bottom line, paralegal is a legal support vocation. I honestly don’t know what legal specialty(ies) would involve animals. But I agree with you. You may find being a veterinary technician to be more satisfying. Vet techs actually work with animals hands-on. Define “great.” Once again, I think paralegal is a tough vocation in a tough industry.
As far as well-paying jobs being hard to come by, at least around here all paralegal jobs are hard to come by. This market is very competitive, even in good times. Very few jobs come open and many excellent people compete for them. No matter how good you think you are, other people will always be better. That can be said, of course, for all vocations.
Perhaps at one time the vocation was wide open; schools would advertise that paralegal is a growth vocation. Now it appears the legal industry has absorbed all the paralegals it can and is now jettisoning many of them because of the economy.
* People often confuse being a legal secretary with being a paralegal, they are two different jobs and require different skills. Some people may be able to walk into a legal secretary position and be trained to perform the job, but it does not work that way in a paralegal position, you are expected to know the law, especially procedure, and be able to jump right in and do the job. The fact is, if you want to work in a decent sized firm that does offer good pay, benefits, and room for advancement you are going to be required to have a degree, be certified, or both. In certain areas of practice such as those involving insurance companies, the clients themselves require certification and/or degrees in order for the paralegal to be approved for billing. As for the pay, it all depends on geography and the type of law you are working in, there are some paralegals making six figure salaries. Yes, it is a stressful business, generally speaking, people’s lives are in the balance, whether literally as with criminal law, monitarily with civil, and of course there should be no need for explanation relative to family law. Duties will vary from lawyer to lawyer and firm to firm, there is no one size fits all opinion or description of a paralegal position.
* For the last year or so, I’ve been considering getting my paralegal certificate. I’ve always been interested in law, worked/interned at a few law offices during college and currently work as a legal assistant. I do a lot of administrative work but have increasingly been doing more like e-filing, reviewing briefs, and being able to do a wider range of tasks. I appreciate the experience I have been getting from this job but hope that a paralegal certification program (ABA approved/part-time/1 year/requires a prior bachelor’s degree) would give me a broader overview of legal research and different areas of law along with improving my resume and opening up a wider range of future jobs.
I recently asked my boss what he thought of such programs since I’ve been considering it but wanted an attorney’s opinion. He said experience is much more important than a certification, he hasn’t found those with certifications to be any more knowledgable or better at their job, and said he would not recommend spending the money for such a program. The money is not a huge concern, but now I find myself questioning if I should be doing the program. From searching online, people’s opinions of paralegal programs seem pretty mixed and I don’t want to waste my time or money if it won’t really mean anything.
* This would depend on your state, as some state bars actually regulate paralegals, but absent a benefit like that, I agree with your boss. I’d give it some weight if I’m between two people with no experience, and one has been through a program, but if you have at least two years of experience as a paralegal in mergers and acquisitions or securities (my practice areas), a paralegal certification means nothing to me. I’d expect someone with the same amount of experience and no certification to be just as competent.
* As someone who has had some exposure to an ABA-approved paralegal certificate program, I say that if you have the time, you have the energy, and the area of the legal community you want to get into is somewhat competitive (i.e. large private law firms), you should seriously consider enrolling in and completing a paralegal certificate program.
Firstly, when you mention that you want to have a better idea of the different areas of law and various research responsibilities you can have as a paralegal, that to me is a good reason to at least enroll in the program. The desire to learn and to discover is more than enough reason to seek out more education. Also, I’m not exactly sure where you are located, but the ABA-approved program at a big university down the street from me attracts instructors that not only want to teach you law, but want to connect you to other professionals and want to help you become an awesome paralegal. Speakers are brought in that talk about the area of law they work in, how they landed their first job, and what inspires them to work so hard in their field.
Second, getting a certificate approved by the ABA could prove to be an advantage. It is true that experience in the field is invaluable, but sometimes that piece of paper is what makes or breaks the deal. Attorneys want to hire someone who is e-filing savvy, can perform discovery, put together docs they need, and do all the other important stuff they can’t get to right away. But in a big city environment like mine, positions in the legal field are competitive. And if you want to be a part of one of the top private law firms, having a paralegal certificate could possibly set you apart from the other guy who has the same level of experience as you and who also interviewed for the exact same position as you. Also, getting a certificate from an ABA-approved program is no easy feat. Not only does completion add weight to your resume, but it shows that you are disciplined in your pursuit and determined to excel as a professional paralegal.
Posted inLaw|Comments Off on Paralegal school – is it worth it? Probably not.
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)