This ad from T-Mobile is just one example of the avalanche of miscegenation propaganda that’s been spilling out of the marketing departments of nearly every major American corporation and media organ for the past ten years, and which have been increasing in frequency tremendously since about two years ago.
Why this sudden explosion of commercial, media, and government mongrelization indoctrination?
I can think of four possible reasons why Globo-Homo oligarchies and their paid-for government shills would actively promote miscegenation as selling points for their products/programs.
Corporations have been overrun by SJW board members, executives, and managers. There are “true believers” now running major consumer and media industries, and they push miscegenation because they genuinely believe in its intrinsic value or they genuinely believe in its value as a mindfuck to ostracize and dispirit those (goyim) who aren’t autonomic cheerleaders for the muddy waters narrative.
Corporations are being heavily pressured by SJWs and Numinous Negro shock troops to be more “inclusive” and “fight White privilege”, and the corps are responding by appeasing these freaks, figuring that the small cost in a presumed tiny number of lost irate customers outweighs the larger cost of bad publicity or settling frivolous lawsuits.
Corporate boards have data which shows that miscegenation sells (to their identified market demos)! They push it cynically, to increase their bottom line, feeling no particular emotional attachment to it. If this rationale is true, then that means a growing wedge of American consumers, particularly those with discretionary cash, eat this MiscProp up. Sad!
The ol’ smoke-n-mirrors. Corporations have created a large and avaricious Miscegenation Indoctrination Machine to distract from their 1%er takeover of the American economy. Keep their natural enemies — anti-fat cat shitlibs and low disgust threshold normies — occupied with technicolor hot button agitprop so that their attention is never drawn to the Globo-Homo elites’ championing of open borders, one-way trade agreements, and outsourcing that funnels money into the hands of fewer and fewer mega-wealthy value transferers while gutting the wages of ever more native sons of America.
I don’t know which reason is the most loathsome. All four probably have some salience (I think #2 and #4 are the biggest gears in the Miscegenation Indoctrination Machine). What I do know is that it is Good and Right to call out these Masturbators of the Cuckuverse for their reptilian scheming and attempted brainwashing. The more people that see this anti-White circus for what it is — the gravest show on earth — the more likely that the malevolent purveyors of mongrelization are beaten back to the loony bins where they belong and America can be great again.
PS I object less to authentically in-love mixed couples than I do to the active propaganda by our overlords to shove it down our throats like some twisted creeper’s idea of love.
COMMENTS:
* #5. Liberals that work in marketing selling campaigns to liberals that run corporations. These liberals think they are Rosa Parks every time they put a black person over whites. They also think they can make blacks into Rosa Parks by giving them academic theories of racism and affirmative action advantages. Everyone wants to be Rosa Parks.
* Maybe they know that black male-white female couples turn heads. The first test of the effectiveness of an advertisement is if people actually look at it.
* It is an incredibly powerful way to garner attention; I have read people describe how their head swivelled when they went past such ads. Nor does its use exclude any of the other ways to garner attention you described.
I have never seen anyone else point ‘this rationalization’ out. If it is ‘well-worn’ show me another instance.
Just because we are not supposed to notice race doesn’t mean they can’t take advantage of the fact that we do and they know we do.
* I pointed this out to my teenaged sons again just yesterday when another one of these commercials came on. “Ask yourself why the white father is a pathetic object of ridicule on 95% of these shows. Ask yourself why every “personal color,” in contrast, is wise/unusually capable/the object of desire. I want you to make your judgments based on your actual experiences, boys – not based on some fantasy world that’s being pushed for some reason.”
It’s not the first time I talked to them about this. My older son replied “I know, dad. I see it everywhere. It’s everywhere. I couldn’t not notice it after you started pointing it out.”
They need to understand that they are members of the best only group it is acceptable to hate. They also know that they need to be careful about committing the “crime of noticing” when they’re vulnerable to retaliation.
* And it all starts with the SJW getting into positions of… surprise surprise, HR! They make a stink there first, threatening people with tribunals for think crimes, then it moves outward from there. Same goes for race, religion, sexual orientation stink.
Case in point: a startup company I worked for never had any policies in place. Withing few months of hiring a Pakistani software developer they had everyone take a sensitivity/harassment course, followed by a creation of meditation/prayer/nursing/relaxation room (hint: prayer!).
And don’t even get me started on what women’s presence has done to research and development departments historically filled with men of potty mouths and poor personal hygiene. Everyone is walking on eggshells now? Unless you’re working for a startup, you’re SOL and have to really watch your mouth.
* I recently had an HR recruiter in my company chastise me for dismissing applicants that did not interview well with my team due to lack of humor, not looking in the eye, etc,…
She told me I needed “diversity” and “balance” on my team. No shit, she started using those bullshit words.
The winning blow? I went to her boss and said I “felt very bullied” by her. Use the “feelz” word wherever you can, and fight back with the “bully” moniker as well.
She backed down after that.
* A few years ago, I used to think the magic neegrows on movies were put there as a way to motivate their brethren to improve themselves, but eventually I figured it out it was all propaganda against the white world.
* A few years ago an ADT commercial with a white guy breaking into a black woman’s house. I don’t think in all of human history has that ever happened. Completely unrealistic and absolutely ridiculous.
* “In other instances, curators would inject a story—even if it wasn’t being widely discussed on Facebook—because it was deemed important for making the network look like a place where people talked about hard news. “People stopped caring about Syria,” one former curator said. “[And] if it wasn’t trending on Facebook, it would make Facebook look bad.” That same curator said the Black Lives Matter movement was also injected into Facebook’s trending news module. “Facebook got a lot of pressure about not having a trending topic for Black Lives Matter,” the individual said. “They realized it was a problem, and they boosted it in the ordering. They gave it preference over other topics. When we injected it, everyone started saying, ‘Yeah, now I’m seeing it as number one’.” This particular injection is especially noteworthy because the #BlackLivesMatter movement originated on Facebook, and the ensuing media coverage of the movement often noted its powerful social media presence.”
* It’s not “the corporations,” it’s the ad agencies.
Premise 1: There’s still no good way to evaluate the effectiveness of advertising. Oh, sometimes there will be a campaign which really boosts sales (Grey Poupon, for instance), but by and large companies have an ad budget, they make ad buys, and their sales respond to . . . market conditions and random factors.
Premise 2: Given Premise 1, the Marketing Department of corporations and the ad agencies they buy from have a lot of crossover, and form a more or less self-contained community with little connection to what the corporations actually do. In other words, there’s more common culture among Exxon’s marketing department, Ben & Jerry’s marketing department, and the big ad agencies.
Premise 3: Given the first two, it’s easy to see that ads like this are virtue-signaling on the part of marketing and advertising people. Does showing mixed-race families sell product? No. Does showing mixed-race families help the careers of the people who came up with the ad? Yes.
The 1950s:
