Do The Democrats Have A Lock On The Presidency?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* All throughout 2012 I convinced myself the polls must be biased. It was a cute theory that explained a lot and turned out to be 100% wrong. A simpler explanation of the polls and election results is that we are rapidly approaching (or whizzed past without realizing) the point where the Democrats efforts to elect a new people have made the Democrats the permanent ruling party. Kind of like Sovier Russia but at least there you could understand what their end game was. Here the PC crazy train has no brakes.

* I think while undergraduate affirmative action works mostly the way you’d expect it to (i.e., it puts black students in schools that are too competitive for them, but the colleges are still mostly grabbing the best black students they can get), affirmative action at other levels is actually more irrational still. I’ve seen quite weak students get into top grad schools because they knew how to talk the intersectionality lingo just right, while strong students, if they applied to fields like literature where there’s a fair amount of black applicants, struck out because they made the mistake of acting like they wanted to study Dostoevsky and Kipling instead of comic books and Chimamanda Adichie.

Coates was a quite good magazine journalist, within his narrow beat- his 2007 Cosby article and 2008 Michele Obama article were both fine, and I even liked Fear of a Black President. But there was an enormous pent-up desire for an authentically black public intellectual who said the things people wanted to hear- no wishy washy Glenn Loury or John McWhorter or Roland Fryer. (It was a lot like how Piketty became a #1 bestseller with a quite boring book saying the same thing as any number of magazine articles about inequality, simply because he was an Official Economist saying it.) All the better that Coates was a college dropout, and one from West Baltimore at that- the one ghetto neighborhood in America that, thanks to the Wire, every Goodthinking journalist in America knows well.

(A lot of the Ta-Nehisi Coates phenomenon of 2009-2015 was about how he related to other journalists. I think if you hang out on Twitter you realize there are twelve quadrillion journalists and would-be journalists all sweating each other, terrified that they’re going to get fired, jealous of every big “piece” that comes out but anxious to be seen as praising it, and so on. Ta-Nehisi Coates is, well, “like crack” to that precise demographic; he’s black and authentic when they’re white and all went to Vassar or Brown; he reads long books about distant history while they are all hysterical about the news of the last minute; he writes lyrically and is willing to make calls and interview sources while they all use the same jokey Vox/Buzzfeed/Slate lexicon, short sentences and do most of their interviewing by e-mail; he had a convivial (and then hagiographic) relationship with his blog readers and commenters while they are constantly shouted down by thousands of angry anonymous comments. Undoubtedly, he also offers something to the broader culture, but you have to see him as a choice of other journalists first (in a time when, due to the changing economics of media, journalists have more readers but less money and security than ever before.) The last piece is that he was unusual among journalists in talking with historians, and his blog had a lot of historians commenting for a while; it gave him a particular cheering section within academia that could expand rapidly.)

* What I find fascinating about Sotomayor invoking “the talk” is the sheer cluelessness (alternatively, patronizing lecturing tone) of such recitation. If Sotomayor feels especially ‘put out’ by the existence of “the talk,” it might behoove her to know (white) parents have been raising their children to conduct themselves with propriety when in public and to show respect for police officers (authority figures, adults), so there is no need for “the talk” as it is built in to their upbringing and character.

Perhaps the Latina is not so wise after all.

* Coates is a fucking retard and so is the wise Latina. Only reason they are where they are is their race. They know it, everyone knows it. And this is what we have, retarded intellects all over the courts, schools and ruling class. Puppetheads of color doing the bad-guys’ bidding. Those bastards were brilliant using the morons against us.

* I just saw a video of a speech made by Stephen Miller introducing Trump that was pretty remarkable in its clarity and power. (I generally hate listening to speeches, but this one easily kept my full attention.)

I of course wish Trump himself possessed the same level of focus and sharpness in his speeches, but you get what you get. Obviously nobody would be listening to Stephen Miller if there were no Donald Trump.

* Steve, Shows what a lean source of black references Sotomayor has when she quotes Teh Genius Coates , James Baldwin and W.E.B. DuBois in a legal ruling. There were no pertinent quotes from James Brown, or Little Richard or more currently Lil Wayne? And seeing she is Latino, no Latino sources? Thurgood Marshall would cry with shame.

* The reason most cops act like jerks is because basically they are vulnerable and they want to be in control of the situation and not have anyone question their authority. And they pretty much treat everyone the same way.

As cops get older and more experienced they start to get better cues about the people they are dealing with and that’s where you get the more laid back type cops, once they have you typed as OK. I would bet that 90% of the needless shootings by cops are by guys or gals who haven’t been doing it long enough to feel secure in what they are doing.

For this reason the best way to deal with a police officer is to let him know he is in charge. Call him officer or sir, keep your hands in plain sight, bow your head, comply with commands, no sudden movements, engage in non-hostile dialog. That can change the interaction right there. Even if you have a point however it’s advisable not to talk too much during a stop. They can’t process all of that when they are trying to process you and the environment, and if they get overloaded they will get a threat feeling and turn into a jerk again.

I know most of the local cops where I live so I never have a problem with them. Out of state, if I see an officer doing something I will approach slowly, call him officer, and ask if he needs assistance. Never any problem there, either.

You are right that if black kids are always “taught” that the cops are out to get them they are likely to go into any stop by a police officer with a big chip on their shoulder. And that can get bad really quick.

* It’s amazing how much you can defuse a tense situation with the police with a simple yes sir/no sir or a yes ma’am/no ma’am. Of course it is hard for those with low-impulse control to use this kind of behavior.

* I never got “the talk” in one sitting, but had a father who more effectively dropped his pearls of wisdom along the way. Upon seeing a guy in an overcoat in July, “anyone wearing that much coat in summer is crazy, carrying a sawed-off, most likely both.” Entering an eatery, “never sit up front, sit further back, along the wall if possible, to view the whole room. Know all your exits. Someone looks all antsy before walking in, be ready to book.” “Never go to a bar where you know no one, good way to get your self beat or at the least robbed, at least overcharged by the bartender. Only go with someone known there.” “Going to a ball game or concert with your buddies? What if they ditch you? Pin $100 in your shorts and you can hail a cab home or put up in a hotel for the night and phone for a ride in the morning.”

Cops? Assume bad and corrupt until they prove otherwise. They all have one name: Officer. Some are jerks out of the fun of it, others because they’re as scared as you. The street is no place to dispute a ticket. Court is, and find a lawyer as crooked as the judge.

He didn’t push the stupid people in stupid places doing stupid things, or nothing good happens after 10 p.m. memes, just never get under the influence in strange places so you can keep your wits sharp and cut out when the going gets weird and the weird turn pro (again, the $100 Get out of Dodge money in your undies for the cab to the Holiday Inn). And when walking through ghettoes, stand tall and look everyone in the eye. They’ll think you’re a cop, nuts, or both, and not horse with you.

Posted in Affirmative Action, America | Comments Off on Do The Democrats Have A Lock On The Presidency?

Why Are Jews So Successful?

IQ accounts for most of it.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* You can say that’s a result of them being smarter than the rest of us, but that explanation just doesn’t hold water when you take into account what a small percentage of the population Jewish people are.

* Actually, you can run the numbers and you’d be surprised. Take the average American IQ (100) and standard deviation (15), an estimate for the average Jewish American IQ (115) and standard deviation (15) and the percentage of Jews in the population (say 2%) and just by doing an itegral of a Gaussian function you can calculate the percentage of Jews among people above a certain IQ. The numbers are:

IQ Percent of pop. above that IQ that is Jewish:
120 8.1
130 13.7
140 25.2
145 35.3

Pick a profession in which you think Jews are overrepresented and think about what the minimum IQ to enter that profession is. With something like a leading scientist it is probably around 145, and so you would expect from IQ effects alone that Jews would be 35.3% of leading scientists. This sounds about right. Then there are all the effects of working hard, a culture where parents expect achievement, etc, and so high numbers of Jews in these various positions need not be attributed to nepotism.

Posted in IQ, Jews | Comments Off on Why Are Jews So Successful?

David Suissa: Republicans must dump Trump

David Suissa writes in the Jewish Journal that Republicans must dump Trump because he’s a narcissist, and because he’s “offensive and reckless.” And because he’s unraveling (while he rises in the polls since the Orlando attack). And he’s vulgar and divisive.

Comments at JewishJournal.com:

* Trump does indeed worry me. A lot. But Hillary worries me even more.

Her supreme court picks will destroy democracy in favour of judge made law – and always in alignment with left wing thinking.

Her open borders policy will ensure increased crime, terrorism, and welfare state cost. Above all, as she intends, it will demographically change the nation forever into one that will always vote left wing, thereby destroying the founding philosophy of government, individual responsibility and rights based on tbe individual rather than collective.

Better train wreck Trump, who will do much right and whose wrongs the nation will survive, than Hillary, whose wrongs will kill the nation as it was founded and bas been such a huge force for good – no matter its mistakes and flaws.

* Dumpimg Trump would be like just handing Hilary the Election. The alternative other than Trump meaning Hilary would be 1000X worse than Trump being Elected and the chances of the GOP being able to dump Trump are Slim and None and just in case they were able do it, that would cause so much caos which would just totally destory the Republican Party. Can you imagine if Hilary gets elected the Supreme Court Judges she would appoint. There would no justice in America and might even wind up worse than it is now with the BHO Regime. There has been no Justice for the last 7 1/2 years and having Hilary it will even be worse. Hilary Crimes and her lying and being such a dishonest person makes Watergate like a Kiddy Game. This Lady belongs in Jail.

* Trump will do some good and some bad.

Hillary will do virtually all bad. She’ll weaponize every federal agency to destroy her opposition. She’ll make Lerner, Koskinen, Lynch, and Holder look like pikers. And SCOTUS will become a rubber-stamp for her neo-Marxist, neo-fascist ideology.

I’m a conservative who wanted Walker and then Cruz. But they both lost. Like it or not, Trump is now all I’ve got. I’m hoping he’ll “turn around”, but it’s not looking good.

Posted in America | Comments Off on David Suissa: Republicans must dump Trump

That’s Not Who We Are!

Michael Scheuer writes:

A good friend of mine, a retired Colonel, recently asked if I had noticed that each time Obama, Clinton, Biden, Warren, Sanders, or any other senior Democrat says “that’s not who we are”, it always is in an effort to stop or denigrate – probably on the orders of George Soros — something that would increase the republic’s social cohesion, reduce its debt, improve its security, and strengthen its independence and sovereignty.

Having thought about it, I think the Colonel is on to something; namely, that the word “we” in the phrase refers not to Americans but to the theory-addicted, profligate, Ivy League-educated, amoral, and pro-tyranny elite of the Democratic Party and its fellow cretins in the media and the academy. In fact, when these people use the phrase, what they really are saying is that “you Americans are not who we [your intellectual superiors and pro-tyranny rulers] are, and so we care not for what benefits the republic, but only for that which benefits our egos, political power, and personal fortunes. You Americans are here only to serve as guinea pigs upon whom we can experiment with our social engineering theories.” A few examples of the phrase in action follow.

–When anyone questions the wisdom of the diktats that have imposed the policies of diversity and multiculturalism, the response is that the questioner is a racist and “that’s not who were are”. This silences questions, and that silence allows the madness and illogic at the core of the policies – that is, dividing Americans endlessly and pitting them against each other makes the republic stronger – to proceed unopposed in executing the destruction of the republic for which they were devised.

–When a person asks why we are spending hundreds of millions of borrowed dollars to bring unwanted, unneeded, often anti-American, and not assimilable migrants to the United States, the asker is told he or she is a xenophobe, nativist, and anti-Muslim, and “that’s not who we are”, and so the migrants keep coming to build the unquestioning, unthinking, mostly non-white and non-English speaking, and block-voting peasant class that the Democrats require to finish installing their tyranny.

–When a man asks why American military veterans are being required to go without medical care for so long that some die, while billions of borrowed dollars are spent to give comfortable lives, the internet, and cellphones to illegal aliens, the response damns the questioner as racist, uncaring, and nationalistic, and “that’s not who we are”, and so veterans keep waiting and dying.

–When a woman or a man asks why it takes the so-called “right” to legally murder infants – and to sell their body parts – to make a woman equal to a man, the female questioner is blistered as unmodern, conservative, and submissive, the male as a cruel, domineering, and conservative misogynist, and “that’s not who we are”, and so the total of post-1973 abortions climbs past 60 million.

–When anyone asks why Obama, through executive orders, illegal wars, and using government agencies against political foes, and Clinton, through influence peddling, blithe and narcissistic treason, and lust to delete the 2nd Amendment, are treated as if they are above the law, the questioner is termed a racist, a misogynist, and a right-wing conspirator, and “that’s not who we are”, and so the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and equality before the law lay dying.

–When a woman asks why our sons and daughters are being sent to be killed or maimed in unnecessary wars the national government starts, others in which America is not at risk, to defend Arab and other anti-American tyrannies, and to defend nations whose existence are irrelevant to the republic’s security, she is scathingly denounced as an isolationist, an anti-Semite, and, again, a nationalist, and “that’s not who we are”, and so unnecessary and interventionist wars continue, and kids keep dying or hobbling through the rest of their lives for the ego and world-government ambitions of American fascists.

Posted in America | Comments Off on That’s Not Who We Are!

Bring The Troops Home

Michael Scheuer writes:

Now is the time – listen up, Mr. Trump – for the United States to get out of the Middle East as quickly and completely as possible, certainly before the IS post-cities insurgency resumes in Iraq and Syria. There is nothing left in that theater for the United Sates except additional costly and U.S. Marine-killing defeats. While we are at it, the republic should both withdraw from Afghanistan – the prototypical “lost cause” — and recall each of the numerous penny-packets of U.S. Special Forces from Africa that Obama has deployed for domestic political impact and not anti-Islamist military affect.

The U.S. national government’s war against the Islamists – overseas and perhaps at home — is clearly lost, and just as clearly out of either its control or the control of any Western power or Russia. As Obama and his NATO sidekicks remain bore-sighted on Iraq and Syria, for example, Islamist forces – both IS and al-Qaeda – are gaining power in the Balkans, the North Caucuses, Egypt, Indonesia, Malaysia, Yemen, and Pakistan, and are building manpower and organization in Europe, western China, India, and Bangladesh. Moreover, IS and al-Qaeda are waging war and contesting for power in Libya, the other North African states, West Africa, Somalia, Kenya, and Tanzania, and appear to be gaining toeholds in central and Southern Africa.

A three-continent war against the growing Islamist movement is something only a delusional madman would want to ensnare the republic, so naturally that is exactly what Obama and Hillary Clinton did. Fortunately, the entire Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama-made mess can be sidestepped by the national government if it would do the only thing it is elected to do – protect America and its citizenry first and stay out of other peoples’ wars. And the first requirement of that duty is fourfold; (a) close and control U.S. borders; (b) end all immigration to the United States for five-to-ten years, thereby negating the simpering, teary-eyed cries of discrimination made by clueless people like Paul Ryan, all Democrats, and most pundits and academics; (c) bring U.S. forces home to prepare to fight the Islamists domestically in what will be a tough, costly struggle against a foe that already has killed or wounded many more U.S. civilians inside the continental United States than were killed in all of America’s wars since 1917; and (d) urge all Americans to arm themselves with the most powerful weapons they can afford, having seen how Obama’s administration has made it impossible to cope with the domestic Islamist threat via law-enforcement agencies alone.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Bring The Troops Home

‘Fixer’ bribed cops into closing Lincoln Tunnel lane: feds

New York Post: Cops shut down a lane in the Lincoln Tunnel so a visiting businessman could be escorted through it at the behest of a major de Blasio fundraiser, federal prosecutors charged Monday.

The outrageous move was revealed as part of damning criminal indictments unveiled Monday against four NYPD officers and the shady “fixer’’ who allegedly arranged it.

The stunning arrests marked the first time cops have been charged in the sweeping 3½-year corruption investigation rocking the department and Mayor Bill de Blasio’s office, which is being probed for its fundraising.

Federal prosecutors allege that the civilian behind the closure, Borough Park businessman Jeremy Reichberg, and his pal, real estate investor Jona Rechnitz, spent more than $100,000 on police bribes between 2012 and 2015.

“They got, in effect, a private police force for themselves and their friends — effectively they got cops on call,” Manhattan US Attorney Preet Bharara said.

The criminal indictments alleged that in one instance, “Reichberg, using his connections in local law enforcement agencies, was able to arrange for the closure of a lane in the Lincoln Tunnel and a police escort down that lane for a businessman visiting the United States.”

…With Rechnitz’s help, Reichberg arranged free “flights, hotel rooms, prostitutes, expensive meals, home improvements, and prime seats to sporting events, among other things,” for the cops, court documents say.

In exchange, Grant and Harrington arranged police escorts for the businessmen, handled their personal business disputes, gave them VIP access to events such as New Year’s Eve and the Marathon and provided them with NYPD cards that got them out of traffic tickets, prosecutors allege.

Reichberg was even caught on an early 2015 wiretap indicating that his NYPD connections were so tight that he “was dispensing advice on promotions to members of the NYPD and taking steps to facilitate promotions.’’

Posted in New York, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on ‘Fixer’ bribed cops into closing Lincoln Tunnel lane: feds

Orthodox ‘Christmas Elf’ Arrested in Sprawling New York Bribery and Corruption Probe

Forward: On Christmas Day three years ago, two Orthodox businessmen dressed as Christmas elves knocked on the door of the Staten Island home of a high-ranking officer in the New York City police department.
The elves came bearing gifts, according to a criminal complaint unsealed this morning in federal court in Manhattan: A video game system for the officer’s children and jewelry for his wife.
All told, the officer’s alleged Christmas haul was worth $1,000.
The new details come amid a fresh wave of arrests in the federal corruption investigation connecting high-ranking members of the New York Police Department with the Christmas elves-cum-Orthodox businessmen. Federal wiretaps of the Orthodox businessmen uncovered a system of alleged bribes and payoffs, leading to a sprawling scandal that has already ended or disrupted the careers of a number of police officials and resulted in the indictment on corruption charges of the powerful head of the corrections officers union.
One of the elves, Jeremy Reichberg of Boro Park, was arrested June 20. Court papers do not name the other elf, but press reports identify him as Upper West Side real estate investor Jona Rechnitz. Rechnitz is cooperating with investigators.
In a press statement, U.S. Attorney Preet Bhararah said that in return for bribes, Reichberg had access to “a private police force for [himself and his] friends.”
Reichberg, an ultra-Orthodox businessman, is known in the Boro Park community for flaunting his ties to New York City mayor Bill de Blasio. Rechnitz is a scion of a prominent Orthodox family.

According to the complaint, Reichberg and Rechnitz were so tied in to the police department that they recommended Grant for his job leading the Upper East Side precinct. When a department leader called to inform Grant of his promotion, Reichberg and Rechnitz were on the line.
The complaint lists a litany of favors performed by Grant and Harrington for Reichberg and Rechnitz, including securing them special access to events like parades, police escorts, and helping with investigations related to their businesses. Reichberg and Rechnitz also had Harrington send police cars to provide extra security at synagogues and religious sites. In March of 2015, Reichberg told Harrington that a rabbi at a Manhattan synagogue was fearful in the wake of the Paris terror attacks, and wanted police protection. Harrington told Reichberg that they were “gonna try” to send a car over, and that there would “definitely” be a car there the next day.
The Manhattan synagogue is not identified in the complaint, but Chabad Lubavitch of Midtown Manahttan is located at the intersection described. The synagogue’s rabbi did not respond to an inquiry about whether he had called Reichberg to ask for additional police presence.
According to the complaint, Rechnitz flew Reichberg and Grant to Las Vegas for a vacation in 2013. A prostitute accompanied them on their trip. “GRANT and other took advantage of her services,” the complaint asserts.
The police contacts also pulled strings to get a lane closed on the busy Lincoln Tunnel so a visiting pal of Reichberg could be whisked into Manhattan, the New York Post reported.

COMMENTS:

* This article sickens me. These guys are supposed to be Orthodox Jews. Where is their sense of ethics and honor. They bring shame to all Jews.

* There is zero connection between religious observance and ethical behavior. For example the religious party Shas in Israel has had, by far, the highest percentage of it’s elected officials sent to jail than any other political party.

* A Torahitic injunction is “k’doshim teheyu”. We are to be held to a higher moral and ethical standard than the rest of the world. We are supposed to be a “mamlechet Kohanim”.
Therefore it is a newsworthy abomination when we dress the part but don’t act accordingly.

Posted in New York, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Orthodox ‘Christmas Elf’ Arrested in Sprawling New York Bribery and Corruption Probe

When Orthodox Jews visit the Islamic Center for Ramadan

The story is a good reminder that there are no permanent friends or enemies in the world. Everything is time and context. In some times and contexts, Jews and Muslims have much in common. At other times, they are at war.

Almost no Orthodox shul would meet at a mosque let alone a church.

Julie Fax writes:

For several years, I have been part of an ongoing Muslim-Jewish dialog between the Islamic Center and Congregation B’nai David-Judea (BDJ). Our group was born some five years ago of the shared vision of Imam Jihad Turk, then head of the Islamic center and now president of Bayan Claremont, an Islamic seminary and graduate school, and Rabbi Yosef Kanefsky of BDJ. The Iftar gathering expanded the group from its core 20 or so to our larger communities. In October, BDJ will host both communities at a Sukkah party.
The date had been set long ago, before anyone could have imagined it would be just days after Omar Mateen, claiming allegiance to Islam, killed 49 people at a gay night club in Orlando. Imam Turk told the group that our friendship had even deeper resonance at a time when the Muslim community had once again been pulled under by someone claiming to act in its name.
Turk also noted that while the Islamic Center has relationships with other synagogues, only B’nai David is Orthodox among them, and that commitment to observance adds another layer of connection…

We separated the room into areas for men and women — a convention no Jew or Muslim in the room blinked at.

Posted in Islam, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on When Orthodox Jews visit the Islamic Center for Ramadan

Talking To Children Is Good Practice For Talking To Women

From the Chateau:

There’s another way the behavior of children holds the key to successfully flirting with grown women. The conversation style that elicits peals of joy from children is pretty similar to the conversation style that elicits squeals of arousal from women.

Allow me. When you talk to a kid, they will react in one of two ways: escalating excitement, or boredom. Kids don’t have a “neutral listening gear” like adult men do. When a kid is excited, he’ll show it. When he’s bored, ditto. And there’s no faster way to bore a kid than indulging in long-winded, detail-oriented replies to the myriad questions with which kids love to bombard adults. It’s not that kids don’t want answers to their burning questions; it’s that they don’t want dry answers that aren’t painted with the brute force rhetoric of the primary colors.

Kids expect short answers because kids have underdeveloped attention spans and a hunger for amusement. Just like women. Therefore, kids, (just like women), will zone out on long explanations. And they will positively engage with pithy, sarcastic jibes that merely brush with a sufficient answer to the questions.

Posted in Dating, Feminism | Comments Off on Talking To Children Is Good Practice For Talking To Women

Rhetoric Vs Dialectic: How Game Principles Apply To Politics

From the Chateau:

There’s no question the Trump Temptresses are more attractive than the Hillary Harpies. The photographic evidence accumulates with every rally and selfie. Trump women flaunt hourglass figures and bubble with estrogen. Hillary Hags bomb the retinas with volumetric flask-like waistlines and attitudes dripping caustically with androgen overload.

So it is with no surprise that supporters of TheCunt can be so easily triggered merely by holding up a mirror to them. They know their visages say more about their worldview than any 12,000-word New York Beta Times article could glowingly conceive for them.

CH Maxim #200: Pointing out a feminist’s masculine, ugly physiognomy or a manlet’s androgynous physiognomy is reliable shorthand for their politics.

(One Twatterlord put it pith-wise, “You can tell a man’s politics from his upper body strength. A woman’s by her waist size.”)

Swinging this around to the topic of Game and politics, reader Freereel forwards,

[H]ere’s a great strategy cribbed from the blog Poseidon Awoke:

“Let’s face it, Bernie and Hillary have a terrible branding problem: their supporters are just not attractive. Have you seen Hillary supporters? Lena Dunham is a perfect example. Yuck.

On the other hand, beautiful women love Trump and masculine men want to be Trump. I’ve even seen some predictions of a Trump-inspired baby-boom, which is certainly possible.

As I’ve said before, I spend some of my time in the Trenches meme-ing things into reality. And a Trump presidency is one of those things. I’ve also been learning from Vox Day about the difference between rhetoric and dialectic. When someone attacks Trump with some nonsense charge, a dialectician will attempt to counter with a logical argument, facts and reason. However, humans are rarely persuaded by dialectic. Humans are persuaded by rhetoric. So, I have a new kill shot for those who attack Trump. I post a picture of a hot Trump supporter.

Because Hillary and Bernie supporters are cat-ladies and low-T bronies, they are unattractive, so they have no response. Images like these arouse normal males to want the girl that supports Trump. It’s just animal instinct. Women want to be like the women that men want, so they want to be this girl. This is rhetoric in action. No words, just a picture of a hot Trump supporter. Luckily, there are millions of hot Trump supporters.

It’s a kill shot.

Pickup and politics are kissing cousins. Both utilize the principles of seduction to win the hearts of women and of voters. One paramount Game concept — amused mastery — is the courtship equivalent of meme-worthy rhetoric. In practice, amused mastery manifests as quippy retorts to women’s shit tests, or quasi-juvenile observations of a woman or her surroundings, or dismissive indifference to a woman’s tantrums and dramatics. This is the stuff of ZFG alpha males, and women LOVE LOVE LOVE it.

Amused mastery in the political sphere would appear as a photo of a fat bluehair Hillary voter or a raging, arm-flapping SJW feminist in id-carving response to some shitlib regurgitating boilerplate shitlibbery. The brutalist juxtaposition is a nuke to her anti-antifragile ego. It’s like when a potential date you’re texting starts asking you what you can do for her and talks about the cool guys she knows, and you reply with a Birthday Cat emoji. A rapport break like that can’t be answered. All she can do is laugh with growing desire at your alpha impudence.

Dialectic is the preferred form of communication when level-headed White men are drawing up policies to ensure prosperity for their nation and a future for their posterity. But we don’t live in that world anymore. Our world is tribal wagon-circling and feral women. Dialectic falls on deaf ears in an Idiocracy and in a Jizzocracy.

Rhetoric has the stage now. The beta male who patiently and thoroughly explores all the logical implications of a woman’s emotional extemporizing will bore her to tears. No sex for him. As it is in 2016 American politics; the cuckservative who patiently and thoroughly explores all the Constitutional implications of a liberal’s destructive anti-White animus will ostracize himself from the public discourse. No influence for him.

The ideal set-up for the alt-right rebel is rhetoric + dialectic. Get your kill shot in, then cow the others with an unanticipated foray into informed dialectic. This is a war that needs its meme MOABs as much as its persuasion personnel.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Rhetoric Vs Dialectic: How Game Principles Apply To Politics