Rigging Elections

Steve Sailer writes:

Ironically, the most far-reaching scheme to rig this and future American elections isn’t being plotted in the Kremlin (as Hillary Clinton and the ruling media warn). Nor is it being hammered out in K Street offices by lobbyists, Democratic operatives, and their press counterparts (as Donald Trump suggests).

Instead, Democrats and their auxiliaries in the media routinely boast of their dream of turning America into a one-party state through changing who gets to vote in American elections.

Strikingly, this vast conspiracy to dilute the sovereignty of American voters by inviting in ringers from abroad is not covered up, nor even excused as aggressive-but-legal political hardball.

Instead, the dilution of the voting power of American citizens is praised lavishly as representing the highest value of “who we are as Americans.”

To protest, or even to notice, the open machinations to adulterate the value of your vote by importing millions of foreigners to increase the numbers of votes cast for the Democrats brands you as a deplorable.

That the Democrats want ever more non-Americans allowed into America so that these immigrants and their descendants can tip American elections toward permanent Democratic rule is something that Democrats are happy to discuss, just so long as Republicans admit that if they aren’t supportive of the Democrats’ scheme, then Republicans deserve their upcoming fate.

The Democrats have enjoyed inviting the more narcissistic and naive GOP politicians, such as Lindsey Graham, John McCain, and Marco Rubio, to join them in promoting the Democrats’ attempts to rig future elections via “comprehensive immigration reform.” As the Democrats point out, the only way Republicans can prove to the onrushing millions of foreigners that Republicans aren’t irredeemable, racist haters on the wrong side of history is by helping the Democrats bring in even more future Democrats…

It took Democrats a while to figure out that their grand strategy ought to be to give up on persuading the American people to elect them and instead for them to elect a new people.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Rigging Elections

ISLAMIZING THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Joseph Klein writes in 2013:

The Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is pressuring public schools in this country to make special accommodations for Muslim students and to deny comparable accommodations for students of other faiths.

For example, CAIR’s instructional material for teachers entitled “An Educator’s Guide to Islamic Religious Practices” advises schools to permit Muslim students who wish to attend Friday congregational worship (known as Jum’ah) to “request a temporary release from school.”

In Michigan, CAIR went beyond dispensing general advice from its guidebook. In April, 2013, it pushed for public schools in Dearborn, Michigan to accommodate Muslim students who wish to comfortably pray on school grounds and to allow Muslim students to leave early on Fridays for Jumu’ah prayers.

The school superintendant caved, and CAIR got its wish.

Just a few months earlier, the same CAIR Michigan branch had complained that a Detroit area elementary school was being too accommodating to Christians when it allowed its teachers to distribute permission slips for parents to sign so that their children could be released to attend off-site Bible studies classes.

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on ISLAMIZING THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

The Left Has No Idea How Naked They Are

Comment:

A First World country (USA, 2017) that is rapidly turning into a Third World country might develop a penchant for a coup or two.

Swiss army Chief of Staff urges citizens to arm themselves against ‘impending social disorder’:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-30/swiss-army-chief-warns-social-unrest-calls-upon-citizens-arm-themselves

High-ranking British general all but threatens a coup. “The general staff would not allow a Prime Minister to jeopardise the security of this country, and I think people would use whatever means possible, fair or foul, to prevent that.”

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/a-very-british-mutiny-corbyn/

French-Jewish writer Eric Zemmour claims military sources tell him the French General staff is preparing contingency plans to ethnically cleanse muslims and take back control of France in an emergency. Says they are secretly being advised by Israelis:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1756879/french-army-has-secret-plan-to-ethnically-cleanse-muslims-from-france-with-the-help-of-israeli-specialists-far-right-writer-claims/

“The U.S. military has zero history of such behavior”

Excepting, of course, the bloodiest war in the country’s history.

As noted previously, Trump (or whoever follows him) already has a strong majority among ‘men with guns’ (military, ex-military, police, border patrol, NRA, etc).

The left are so full of themselves now, they have no idea how naked they are.

I’d love to be a fly on the wall of the officer’s barracks across the Western world these days.

Not that I would ever advocate or condone any such (illegal) activity. Just observing.

“Does Trump have a place of exile picked out?”

Moscow, from which he could lead the resistance.

Because you never march on Moscow (Hillary might try, though. Playing right into the trap).

* While I can imagine that Hillary and her Big Friends in the media would want to pull Trump down legally, I really doubt that they would be able to pull it off, not least because of the political repercussions for them both.

Trump has called for Hillary to be prosecuted, but the public understands his point — they too see how Hillary has skated on being charged over her deletion of the 30K emails and the following lies. There’s no pretending that she wasn’t up to something that either was genuinely criminal or came within an inch of being so.

But Trump has no such potentially criminal history. Even the bizarre, over-the-top condemnations of him don’t allege any actual criminality. They would have to invent a charge from whole cloth to go after him. Of course they could do so, and may try to do so, but the larger public isn’t going to buy it, and his supporters — who will certainly be close to half the nation — will reject it vehemently.

Framing Trump on a contrived charge would be a disaster for the rigged system it would be designed to protect. Nothing could do greater damage to any sense of legitimacy in that system. If it seemed rigged before, how would it seem after it allowed Hillary to skate, while Trump gets prosecuted?

I can’t say with certainty they wouldn’t try to go after Trump, but they would truly be playing with fire if they did.

It would not end well.

* It is not enough to have capable leaders; we must control the mindscape.

Democracy just means rule by mass media and schooling in this technological age. The great populace doesn’t know what it takes to lead – but getting their vote still matters to some extent, and that is the real power base.

The left had the right of it in going after control of the media and academia – we must do the same. This is the age we live in.

* Not only would Cruz have lost badly, he would have done so championing an elitist-lite mantra that would have been a great foil for Hillary: tax cuts for the rich, more wars, flax tax, blah blah blah, Russia-be-evil, giving lip service to irrelevant social issues such as abortion and turning people off with religion talk. It amazes me how anyone out there could really think that guy had any chance of winning.

* Wearing a Trump shirt definitely leads to physical intimidation and ultimately violence against the wearer, here in Los Angeles. No “possibly” about it.

Yes, I have been stupid / brave enough to wear Trump shirts right here in downtown LA, Hollywood, West Hollywood, North Hollywood, Culver City, and even bizarre Christian-hating bigoted Santa Monica.

I have been spit at and threatened — with my small children right there — and one “man” even asked my wife whether she wanted to leave her “fascist dick” husband and get a real man (presumably him, since a real man goes around frightening and embarrassing women and children, as we all know).

Visiting family in New Jersey, I had a large fat slovenly “man” accost me in a pizza parlor (good old Secaucus), bump me with his chest and gut, curse and scream at me in the middle of the restaurant, make lewd comments to my wife, and DIRECTLY THREATEN MY CHILDREN. The owner did nothing, nor did any of the other customers. With these kind of pussies being the “good ” people, evil bullies will certainly grow even bolder and more aggressive.

I’m going to wear the shirt again. I’m an American and a man. Fuck ‘em.

* We may not need to. The following are going to be hard for the MSM to ignore entirely:

look at this: http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/hillary-clinton-lesbian-sex-claims-vince-foster-fixer/ This is my personal favorite. It will be the elephant in the room at the coming debate. If Hillary brings it up as a smear campaign Trump need only reply that she has three weeks to disprove it while it only took him a week to demolish her smear campaign. Then I hope he’ll finally get around to addressing the issues that can win him the election.

and this: http://therightscoop.com/watch-new-bombshell-video-just-released-james-okeefe-mass-voter-fraud/

and this: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-18/wikileaks-releases-another-1894-podesta-emails-part-11-data-dump-total-now-17150

and this: http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/emails-hillary-needs-podium-speak/

Trump and his supporters have begun their counter attack. And I suspect that this is only the beginning. The Clinton corruption and incompetence are well known. I’ll bet Trump’s team didn’t have much trouble uncovering verifiable, indisputable material that should put her in prison until she dies.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Left Has No Idea How Naked They Are

Meet the Alt-Right ‘Spokesman’ Who’s Thrilled With Trump’s Rise – Trump’s campaign has legitimized Richard Spencer’s movement, and Spencer couldn’t be happier about it

Rolling Stone: Just two weeks after Hillary Clinton delivered her August speech decrying Donald Trump’s ties to “an emerging racist ideology known as the ‘Alt-Right,'” the Alt-Right movement’s leaders host a press conference – a coming-out party of sorts – at Washington, D.C.’s tony Willard Hotel. Sponsored by the National Policy Institute, a small non-profit “dedicated to the heritage, identity, and future of people of European descent in the United States,” the conference prominently features the institute’s president, Richard Spencer, a trim and tidily dressed 38-year-old with grandiose ambitions to usher in a white “ethno-state.” Spencer is joined by two older compatriots: Jared Taylor, the founder of the website American Renaissance, which promotes faux science claiming that blacks are intellectually inferior to whites, and Peter Brimelow, who once wrote for Forbes and National Review before founding VDare, an anti-immigrant site named after Virginia Dare, who is said to be the first British child born in the American colonies. The trio spends two hours holding forth on the Alt-Right’s core beliefs and its growing notoriety in the age of Donald Trump.

“We want something heroic. We want something that is not defined by liberalism, or individual rights, or bourgeois norms. We want something that is truly European and truly heroic,” Spencer says at the podium. “That is fundamentally what the Alt-Right is about.” Race, he says, “is real. Race matters, and race is the foundation of identity.”
The Alt-Right prides itself on its leaderless ethos, using social media to spread its ideology through viral memes and anonymous attacks on its enemies, real and imagined. But Spencer coined the term Alt-Right, back in 2010, and has since positioned himself as the movement’s leading intellectual and most visible spokesman.
Post-conference, Spencer invites a cluster of journalists and Alt-Right fans for drinks at the staid hotel, where he relishes being the center of attention.
Spencer says he guesses women comprise only about a fifth of the Alt-Right – an imbalance that’s obvious at the gathering, where there appears to be only one female follower amid the dozen or so men who cycle in and out.
No matter. Spencer tends to see women as manipulative figures who are best when submitting to Alt-Right virility. Women, he tweeted during the first debate between Hillary Clinton and Trump, “should never be allowed to make foreign policy. It’s not that they’re ‘weak.’ To the contrary, their vindictiveness knows no bounds.” Over drinks, he suggests that most women secretly crave Alt-Right boyfriends because they want “alpha genes” and “alpha sperm.” When a man by the bar suggests someone should write a novel about “a liberal feminist studies major falling in love with a Richard Spencer type,” Spencer suggests I write it.
More recently, in a podcast recorded after the exposure of the so-called Trump tape, Spencer scoffed at the “puritanical” criticism of Trump, saying it’s “ridiculous” to call what Trump was talking about sexual assault. “At some part of every woman’s soul,” he said, “they want to be taken by a strong man.” Pointing to how Trump said he had taken Nancy O’Dell furniture shopping, Spencer added, “Is this really the worst thing you’ve ever heard? In a way, he’s like the most gentlemanly, kindly philanderer of all time.”
Spencer has become more enthused as Trump has ramped up his claims about how his campaign represents an “existential threat” to “global special interests.” After Trump’s widely criticized speech in West Palm Beach last week, during which the GOP nominee alleged a “conspiracy” against the American people led by a “global power structure,” Spencer tweeted, “The shackles are off, and Trump is getting radical. We’ve never seen a major postwar politician talk like this.” He later amplified his appreciation of what he characterized as Trump “demystifying ‘racism’ and the financial power structure,” concluding, “No matter what happens, I will be profoundly grateful to Donald Trump for the rest of my life.”
At the Willard in September, over a Mint Julep followed by Manhattans, Spencer, whose free-wheeling style with journalists has made him the Alt-Right’s “it boy,” gabs about white nationalism and his disdain for electoral democracy. He also discusses why he supports Trump, and their shared respect for Vladimir Putin. “I admire Putin too,” he says. “Who wouldn’t?”
“I love empire, I love power, I love achievement,” he goes on, growing animated. Spencer loves imperialism so much, he says, that he’ll sometimes “get a boner” reading about Napoleon.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on Meet the Alt-Right ‘Spokesman’ Who’s Thrilled With Trump’s Rise – Trump’s campaign has legitimized Richard Spencer’s movement, and Spencer couldn’t be happier about it

What’s Wrong With Hillary?

Edward Klein writes for the Washington Times:

Mr. Obama and Ms. Jarrett have been so worried about Hillary’s health that they recently offered to arrange a secret medical checkup for her at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.

Hillary declined their offer because she feared a leak to the media would prove fatal to her presidential campaign. Instead, she has been secretly visiting the New York-Presbyterian Hospital, where she arrives through a private entrance out of public sight and where she can rely on her doctors not to speak to the media.
Sources close to Hillary tell me that her doctors have discovered she suffers from arrhythmia (an abnormal heart beat) and a leaking heart valve. They have recommended that she consider having valve replacement surgery, but Hillary has refused because she does not want to risk the negative political fallout from stories about such a serious operation.
In addition to the arrhythmia and leaking heart valve, Hillary suffers from chronic low blood pressure, insufficient blood flow, a tendency to form life-threatening blood clots, and troubling side effects from her medications.
Her doctors have prescribed Coumadin, a blood thinner, and a beta blocker to treat her condition. However, these medications make her drowsy and tired, lower her blood pressure, and have led to frequent bouts of light-headedness and fainting spells.
Hillary has suffered at least five fainting spells that the public is aware of, including the most recent one at the 15th anniversary memorial service of 9/11.
In addition, there have been many other incidents of fainting that have been hidden from the public.
For example, after her 11-hour testimony before the Trey Gowdy Benghazi committee, Hillary swooned as she walked to her waiting Secret Service SUV and had to be carried into the back seat by her aides.
Among Hillary’s friends, it is common knowledge that she suffers from tension headaches, sits with her feet elevated, nods off to sleep while studying her speeches, gets dizzy and has frequently stumbled and fallen at her home in Chappaqua. She asks her closest aide, Huma Abedin, to rub her shoulders and bring her cold compresses for her neck and forehead.
“Huma always kneels down, whispers to her, rubs her shoulders, and comforts her,” said one of Hillary’s closest friends. “Huma seems genuinely alarmed at her condition, and looks agonized as well.
“Hillary also has a masseuse on call to work on her legs, which give her almost constant pain,” this friend continued. “It reminds me of what I read about Jack Kennedy’s constant back problems and how they were always hidden from the public.
“Hillary’s campaign people are well aware of her problem and are doing everything possible to make her schedule as easy as possible, but it’s hard to run for president and not work hard and spend a lot of time on your feet and constantly get photographed.
“Hillary believes that for the most part the press has been very considerate, withholding the worst pictures of her, particularly the ones of her looking like she is in agony, or worse, simply confused. I’m convinced that if it was up to Bill, he would have shut down the campaign a long time ago. But Hillary would rather die than do that. I think it is fair to say that the biggest issue behind the scenes with the campaign is Hillary’s health.”

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on What’s Wrong With Hillary?

Tabletmag on Jared Kushner: “Does he remain the type of person that others want to do business with, or socialize with, even in New York?”

Oy vey! The social consequences of supporting Donald Trump!

From Tabletmag:

Soon, very soon, barring some succession of events so awful as to surpass even the insanely high bar set this season for civic unpleasantness, Donald Trump will be consigned to the dustbin of American political history. Unless the very real and deep problems that the country is facing today—the onward march of the billionaires, a collapsing press, the spreading effects of technologies that make large sections of the workforce redundant, the decline of American power abroad, a resurgence of identity politics at home, etc.—somehow prove fatally disorienting, he will go slouching back to Mar-a-Lago. Perhaps the specter of a Trump presidency will have a lingering salutary effect on both parties, and the political fevers will break, though probably not.

Other key questions will nevertheless remain. Among those pertinent here: What will become of Jared Kushner, the Trump campaign’s smooth-faced consigliere, who just last week broke his regular observance of the Sabbath for a strategy meeting in Trump Tower to help his father-in-law (in Yiddish, mechutan) deal with a tape of his extraordinarily vulgar remarks about women? Can his role be chalked up to a more-or-­less normal sense of loyalty and ambition? Does he remain the type of person that others want to do business with, or socialize with, even in New York? Or will Kushner be held responsible, in some important ways, for his role in his father-­in­-law’s campaign?

The Times has called Kushner a “de facto campaign manager” for Donald Trump, but in a campaign that often seems rudderless, his real value may be less managerial than sensory. Trump has moderated his tendency toward bigotry and misogyny only slightly since the beginning of election season, and recent revelations have made the change seem especially superficial. Kushner, on the other hand, is a normalizing presence. His hair is a normal color. He signals his aspirations legibly, without being garish. At cocktail parties, he is pleasant. For Trump, he has been an essential go-between—a kind of human balm, useful for preventing or soothing abrasions. Trump reportedly uses him exactly this way, deploying Kushner as an emollient with corporate and political figures, including Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer; Henry Kissinger; Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto; Ronald Perelman; Paul Ryan, and numerous other Republican leaders. This past September, Kushner helped arrange a meeting between Trump and Netanyahu. A former associate of Rupert Murdoch recently told The New Yorker: “I think Jared’s been the key in getting Rupert to come around to the idea of a Trump presidency.”

But the question of what else there is to Jared Kushner remains somewhat mysterious. “It’s interesting, because [Kushner is] just like Trump in a way,” said Michael Gross, a journalist and author who has known Trump for many years. “He had this ambition to cross the river and make a mark. And yet he remained, and remains, something of a cipher. Obviously, the question is: Is there a there there?”

Posted in America | Comments Off on Tabletmag on Jared Kushner: “Does he remain the type of person that others want to do business with, or socialize with, even in New York?”

Univision Bought The Onion In January

That might explain why it is rarely funny anymore.

Comments:

* So… Unavision and The Root are not owned by Hispanics and blacks, but… by a Jew?

…and people wonder where these “Jews-control-the-world” “conspiracy” theories come from.

* “There has to be, I think, some sort of way in which we can sort through information that passes some basic truthiness tests and those that we have to discard, because they just don’t have any basis in anything that’s actually happening in the world,” Obama added.

His remarks came amid an election campaign that has seen Republican candidate Donald Trump repeat ideas and take on key staff from right-wing media outlets.

They also come at the end of an eight-year presidency in which Obama has been plagued by false scandals over his place of birth that have forced him to play media-critic-in-chief.

* Trump touched “right-wing media outlets.” Eew! Cooties!

This reminds me of when Clinton (Bill) went after talk radio shock jocks. Big surprise, progressives don’t like things to the right of them.

* “Bloomberg Businessweek: Hillary’s Billionaire”

Hillary doesn’t have a billionaire. However billionaires have a Hillary.

* I don’t think a certificate of truthiness from Google or the Government will be quite as authoritative as they seem to believe. I think it would develop into the inverse of the old joke about the French Foreign Ministry: “It must be true; the Quai d’Orsay denies it.”

It must be false; the certified fact checkers say it’s true.

* Saban is wanting to take Univision public?

That means, like, I can buy shares in, among other things, the merchandizing of Alicia Machado’s thighs and ass via that sitcom she’s on (“Una familia con suerte,” innit?), right?

Will I be able to call her a porker if she, like, porks up and gets butt-ugly and is no longer a good investment?

I mean, after all, as a shareholder, won’t I own part of her and have a stake in what she does to herself?

Or is the Brave New Univision Telemundo World Order one where you are forced to buy shares in things? And the Sabans and Yellens decide what it will be worth. And you can’t sell if the investment goes sour, you just take your crash after the big boys finish skimming the cream. Plus you have to claim to like the fatsos du jour because they are the BNUTWO’s current objects of worship, and to fail to worship is not only heresy, it’s racist sexist macroaggression hate crime.

I’m almost liking this Bizarro World univision of capitalismo del sud en el norte. It’s almost worthy of the absurdity of central banking, manipulated markets, globalist diversitopian insanity, and forced idiocracy in the service of a bigger, more lucrative Hive of shoppers lugging around their own Skinner Boxes.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Univision Bought The Onion In January

Rapper’s Dead Body Taken To Strip Club For Farewell Party

shawty-lo-rapper-strip-club-dead-body

NEWS: Atlanta rapper Shawty Lo‘s funeral ended just the way he would have liked … with a pit stop at the local strip joint.

Friends and family remembered Lo Friday with a memorial service followed by a procession straight to The Blue Flame Lounge … one of Shawty’s favorite strip clubs.

The video is fantastic. Lo’s hearse pulls up to the club and a mourners/patrons observe a candle-lit moment of silence.

40-year-old Shawty was killed a few weeks back when his 2016 Audi hit a tree — he was posting videos from The Blue Flame hours before his death.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Rapper’s Dead Body Taken To Strip Club For Farewell Party

Hillary & Open Borders

Steve Sailer notes: The WSJ Editorial Page has been using “open borders” to mean unlimited immigration since 1984.

COMMENTS:

* I could see Hillary bringing back HUAC hearings. Prominent racists, xenophobes, Islamophobes, sexists, homophobes, anti-Semites, isolationists, and exposed Russian secret agents would be forced to testify about their “Un-American” activities.

* I always enjoy being preached about community by people who hold the Ghettos to be a representation of assimilation. It really is funny. Has anyone noticed all the preachers of Open Borders have walled compounds with 24/7 security?

Posted in America | Comments Off on Hillary & Open Borders

Is There A Man Who Has Not Made An Unwanted Sexual Advance?

Steve Sailer writes: That raises the question of which heterosexual man never made an “unwanted sexual advance”? Warren Beatty in the year after the release of Bonnie and Clyde? Wilt Chamberlain during the Lakers’ 33-game winning streak? Jimmy Page and Robert Plant during Led Zep’s “Stairway to Heaven” tour of Australia?

Way back in 1992 I pointed out that the conventional definition of illegal sexual harassment as making “unwanted sexual advances” threatened to get President-Elect Bill Clinton impeached eventually:

The word in the orthodox description that especially troubles Americans (and baffles Europeans) is “unwanted.” Logically speaking, we could, like the Khmer Rouge in the Year Zero, try to abolish all sexual advances, unwanted and wanted. Given enough secret policemen, it might almost be doable. But to try to eliminate just the advances that turn out to be “unwanted” while preserving the “wanted” ones, requires not just a police state but a time machine. …

Trust me, few guys like getting rejected. It’s just that no advance is wanted or unwanted until it’s made. Unwanted sexual advances are the price we all pay for the survival of the species. …

Surveys report that a large minority of American women say they have been sexually harassed. What these confirm is that the majority of women don’t take the fundamentalist definition seriously, otherwise the surveys would find not 30% or 40% agreement, but virtually 100% . What self respecting woman would admit that no man had ever made an unwanted sexual advance toward her? She’d be admitting either that no man’s ever made her a sexual advance or that she’s never met a sexual advance she didn’t like.

It’s discouraging that our elites are as dumb about this simple point as they were two dozen years ago the first time a Clinton ran for President.

COMMENTS:

* The rock star Rod Stewart often proudly sported the slogan ‘Sex Police’ at concerts, in videos, stage sets etc. Apparently, it’s a long running in-joke with the aptly named Rod and his entourage.
All stems back tons time in the 1970s when Rod Stewart and his crew were touring Germany, and winded up in Hamburg’s notorious Reeperbahn.
One night, many of Rod’s entourage retired to their hotel rooms with questionable female company. Somehow, Rod Stewart had procured a German police cap and uniform. Suitably attired, Rod kicked down the hotel room doors and barked, in best cod German accent ‘Ve are de Sex Police and have come to arrest you’.

* Well, it can be described as discouraging. We could also call it catastrophic. I think that this is one of the reasons why I like your writing, Steve. You are an optimistic, glass half full type guy.

* Sailer I don’t know why you didn’t go into law, given your reflexive contrarianism.

One vestige of my Catholic upbringing is a general reticence to talk about my sex life with people other than my sexual partners and close friends, but I suppose in this case it’s germane.

I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve made anything that could be construed as an “unwanted sexual advance”, and not for lack of effort or opportunity. I had a high number of sex partners during my more degenerate years (none of which were strictly transactional affairs (just to preemptively shut the trolls up)).

It’s not hard to tell when a woman wants you to ask her out. It’s not hard to tell when a woman wants you to kiss her. It’s not hard to tell when a woman wants you to undress her. It’s not hard to tell when a woman wants you to engage in sexual activity.

And all my “unwanted” advances were arguably not that unwanted at all. All the instances involved women who were clearly sexually aroused but, for whatever reasons, did not want to sate their desires. And frankly that’s never been a big deal for me since my overwhelmingly favorite part of sex has always been the feeling of being desired.

When most people talk about “unwanted sexual advances” they’re talking about advances from guys like Trump with overinflated egos and underdeveloped empathy. If you don’t believe the stories that these women are saying about him, you’re dumb.

* How can a man know whether a sexual advance is wanted before making one? One way is by asking, but this all goes back to wide-spread hypocrisy about the subject. How many women want to be asked first? How many women would respond positively to a verbal query even if they’re interested? Are women that expect and want men to take risk less entitled to their desire than ones that would rather be asked verbally?
Formally it has to be illegal to make a sexual advance, because women are entitled to protection, certainly minors are. But then all assault is illegal, and men still get into bar-brawls, fist fights, etc. They don’t run to mama, to the press or to police every time that happens.
There has to be some leeway where people can act on primal instincts without making a Federal case of it. People who want to cooperate have equal rights to people who don’t, and they’re entitled not to have their ability to cooperate foreclosed by people who don’t want to cooperate.
That’s why men are afraid to publicly come out and state that some of the accusations levelled at Trump, even if true – are insignifcant. It’s not behavior that should be legal – but who gives a sh*t if it happened? There are gray areas in life, and a lot more is at stake than this garbage.
Hillary Clinton is a woman who more than likely has been sexually repressed most of her adult life. Why was her husband chasing so many other women all those years? Where was she getting her sexual needs fulfilled? This pussy-grab-gate agenda isn’t about protecting women. It’s about protecting sexually repressed people of both genders. Clinton assumes everybody is as sexually repressed as her and would give a da*n.

* Yes, I think the allegations are all a distraction from the wikileaks leaks.

Yes, I think the media is all in for HRC. Yes, I also believe all of Bill Clinton’s accusers.

Yes, I think Hillary Clinton is a despicable human and would make a catastrophic president.

No, I would not piss on her if she were on fire.

Yes, I am probably still going to vote for Trump.

But yes, I believe his accusers and I believe there are probably more to come.

* We’ve arrived at the end times of sexual politics in America, an era that started in the 1820′s with women married to men who fell victim to cheap 120 proof beverages, beginning the Temperance movement (the national criticism of male behavior) and the Suffrage movement (the political replacement of disgusting, fallible men with the perfect part of humanity – women).

The female empowerment and male white knighting that resulted has now reached its logical conclusion; all women are victims and we must stand society on its head to offer our infinite contrition.

As Hillary totters spastically toward victory in November with a Botox grimace of joy, we men are left with the feeling that Saurona has got the ring of power and women have won a dismal victory so complete that no man can see its ending, if you’ll forgive my butchery of Tolkien.

MORE COMMENTS:

* In one sense it’s depressing: It’s been 25 years, and yet here we are, still allowing men to exist and interact with women. Join me in signing a petition to ban males from public office.

* I think back on the testimony of Anita Hill, and what a mountain was made about a molehill. Let’s see. . . Thomas is supposed to have asked her out a few times. He mentioned the name of a character in a porno film, “Long Dong Silver.” He saw a kinky hair on the lid of a Coke can and said it looked like a pubic hair. I recall Orrin Hatch reacted to that last one as if it were the most appalling thing he had ever heard. And Orrin was a friend of Teddy Kennedy!

In my corporate years I heard worse nearly every day. As someone observed, “How did Anita Hill survive middle school?” She must have been the original fragile snowflake. Or more likely, the original put-up feminist character assassin.

* Steve, this is why you have to be very careful on WASP cultural worship. I’m mostly descended from them so I can say this, but it’s looking more and more like they’re somewhat of a fluke

Sure, you can admire them all you want for supposedly being the nicest, most civilized, highest civilization or whatever. But does that mean anything if they collapse after such a short time?

Should a husband be applauded for being so nice to his wife, always forgiving her for cheating on her all the time? So much so that you suspect he might be enjoying it, watching it, sneakily driving her to it by being “nice”?

* The field is littered with the dead and bleeding bodies of people who thought they were smarter than Donald Trump. One more to go!

* The Arkansas state troopers reported she and Vince Foster might have been an item.

Maybe Vince was in love with Hillary, but Bill’s election meant they could never be together and that made him suicidally depressed?

It’s almost certainly not true, but it’s the most romantic conspiracy theory ever made up about Hillary.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Is There A Man Who Has Not Made An Unwanted Sexual Advance?