‘Trump is a White version of Ali.’

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Who’s Trump’s Sonny Liston then? Bill Kristol?

* It is funny to know that Bill Kristol has already made such an ass of himself that someone will just have to play him in any film about Trump’s road to the White House.

* Having Negro style masculinity is bad if you want to stay out of trouble with the police and want to live a drama free life. But I recommend for East Asian men and White men to adopt Negro style masculinity only for trying to pick up women.

Adopt the positive aspects of Negro masculinity, but none of the negative aspects of it. If you do that, you basically get Italian masculinity.

Italian men aggressively pursue women just like Black men do, but commit crime at the level of WASP men. It’s a perfect balance, it’s the best of both worlds.

* Incidentally, his daughter married a white man. I wonder if it was her way of rebelling.

* Many of Ali’s opponents came to sticky ends, besides Liston. Sonny Banks knocked him down in their 1962 bout, and was killed in a 1965 bout with Leotis Martin. Zora Folley was found in a motel pool with massive head injuries. Oscar Bonavena was very unhappy with the refereeing of their 1970 match, his only inside the distance loss, and was shot dead in Nevada in 1975.
Ken Norton won all 3 fights against Ali, though he only got the decision in one. Victim of an unexplained single vehicle car accident, and in a coma for 5 years. Trevor Berbick was killed with an axe in 2006. Alejandro Lavorante was another opponent who died from injuries received in a later bout.

* The key character development of the movie “Creed” was from beating up black guys outside the ring to beating up white guys inside the ring:

The hero in Creed basically has three main obstacles he must overcome:

a) He must stop beating up black guys outside the ring and start beating up white guys inside the ring.

b) He must become part of an authentically black community, in an authentically black city (Philly), by winning the love of an authentically Philly woman.

c) He must make peace with his father, Apollo Creed, and his legacy.

Hey– an alienated son of privilege must make peace with his father’s ghost and become a leader of his race by joining the community of a large black-dominated American city and winning the love of one of that city’s native daughters: I think I’ve read that book before.

Michael Jordan, the actor playing the title role, played Wallace in “The Wire,” the prototypical callow black youth caught in forces beyond his control. And in contrast to Carl Weathers, who really looked like he could have been a champion in the original Rocky, Jordan comes across as pretty callow here. But it works. In almost every scene, Adonis Creed seems less grounded than any of the other, usually older actors around him, but in a way this suits his role as an all-purpose vehicle for hopes (his own and others’) rather than a person with an intense inner life…

Creed, though wrapped in the flashy boxing robe of the big-ticket Rocky franchise, feels like an elegiac repurposing of the myth of Obama himself for the era of Black Lives Matters and the closing year of his presidency.

* OT: a nice quote by Tila Tequila, former porn star and now twitter nazi, on ‘Fash the Nation 42′ (https://radio.therightstuff.biz/2016/06/04/fash-the-nation-week-42/), ~89:30. She came back to Houston after it’d been diversified. She says the intent of section 8 is to put blacks on their best behavior, get them out of their bad environments, but that “that’s not how it works, they dominate the neighborhood and chase out the nice people” (paraphrase). Promises good times for Obama’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.

* Real boxing doesn’t look much like a Rocky movie, where everything is telegraphed so viewers can follow what’s going on.

Boxing is kind of like hockey where the action tended to be too quick to really follow on pre-HD television. I watched a lot of Olympic boxing on TV in 1976, but I had a hard time following who was winning from what I was seeing.

Did they have instant replay set up for the closed circuit telecast?

Former champ James J. “Cinderella Man” Braddock was in the front row and told a reporter: “I have a feeling that this guy (Ali) is a lot better than any of us gave him credit for,” Braddock said. “It isn’t the knockout punch that sticks in my mind as much as a punch he let go (earlier)….It was a right to Liston’s jaw and it shook him to his shoetops. For all we know, it could have been the one that set up the knockout.”

* In Madmen the old secretary, Miss Blankenship, expresses no interest in Clay-Liston and says “If I wanted to watch 2 negroes fight I’d throw a dollar out the window.” Which is a great line and an example of Weiner having it both ways, as the audience can laugh and say it’s laughing at how awful people used to be.

* Some economists studied the Houston Section 8 lottery; the applicants who won the lottery and received the housing voucher committed more crimes, mostly assaults. Men who won the lottery were twice as likely to get arrested than men who applied for Section 8 but lost. Basically, since spending the voucher is fungible with other spending, you can get drunk (or high, perhaps) more often if you win than if you don’t, and consequently get in more fights. The voucher had no effect on women’s propensity to commit crimes.

This is consistent with other findings that transfers fungible with cash tend to increase crime in the short term (aside from any increases in the long term due to “welfare dependency,” change in culture, etc.)

* For fraction of the money Soros has wasted on BLM, he could have funded surveillance cameras for Chicago’s most violent neighborhoods.

I would like to know what percentage of Chicago homicides take place outside and could be captured on video.

The gang murder trial I was a juror on that ended in an acquittal due to gross lack of evidence happened out in the middle of the street in front of a crowd on a hot summer’s night.

If you watch The First 48, a large number of the shootings involving blacks that are resolved had video evidence. I imagine the show’s producers choose not to waste time attempting to track cases involving AAs that do not have either video, audio or social media evidence simply because the “no snitch” mentality makes the cases poor odds for resolution.

Of course the last thing TWMNBN would want is more video that would end up on WSHH, SBPDL or Colin Flaherty’s Youtube channel.

But improving the CPD murder case conviction rate by just 10% could dramatically lower the carnage.

MORE COMMENTS:

* What happens to all the hatred bottled up inside someone like Ali when he dies? Is it released back into the environment?

Is there some kind law of conservation of hatred like that in physics for the conservation of energy or angular momentum?

Ali even hated his fellow negroes taunting poor Joe Frazier for being too simian-like:

from the Washington Post:

We remember Ali calling Frazier “ugly,” an “Uncle Tom” and, especially, a “gorilla.” And even those of us too young to have stayed up to learn the result of a 15-round prizefight in the 1970s recall how black people laughed and laughed at this.

“I’m cringing in my car right now just thinking about it,” says Janks Morton Jr. He visited Frazier in Philadelphia in the early 1970s with his dad, Janks Morton Sr., who trained Sugar Ray Leonard and was close friends with Frazier’s sparring partner, heavyweight champ-to-be Ken Norton. “I can still see [Ali] sitting next to Howard Cosell punching that [rubber] black gorilla, saying, ‘It’s going to be a thrilla in Manila when I kill that gorilla.’”

* When confronted by the press about his low IQ score, Ali said “I always said I was the greatest, not the smartest.” When he was training for his second match against Sonny Liston in Boston (a match that had to be postponed and rescheduled for Lewiston, Maine because Ali got hit with an appendicitis attack), I went with a college buddy to the small gym where he was working out. He was the most beautiful man I have ever seen. To see him spar in the ring with his sparring partner was truly impressive. He was so quick and graceful. Truly “floated like a butterfly and stung like a bee.” It was a small gym and we were about the only people watching, which meant we were about 25 feet away from the sparring ring. I was also stunned to see how big he was after reading all the stories in the press about how Sonny Liston towered over him with his scowl. Ali was two inches taller, had several inches in reach over Liston and outweighed Liston by a good 15 pounds when I saw him. No wonder my college friend from Louisville cleaned up on the first fight betting a good deal of money at 7 to 1 odds. Later, when Ali met Frazier in their first fight, I happened to be skiing in Innsbruck, Austria with my girlfriend. Because of budgetary constraints, we were staying in a pension with no TV. The night of the fight we checked into a hotel with a TV in the lobby and got a wakeup call around 3 am (because of the time difference) and joined a fairly large crowd in the lobby to watch the fight. I was cheering for Ali all the way but realized that the judges’ decision at the conclusion of the fight was the right one. It was the most memorable and exciting sporting event I have ever watched, in person or on TV. During his career, I always rooted for Ali, but after he retired I concluded that Joe Frazier was the much better man. He put up with all that crap from Ali with a great deal of dignity, and, based on what I read, he conducted himself the same way in all aspects of his life.

BTW I rather enjoyed John McEnroe’s antics when he played and saw the humor in what he did. Apparently, he did too based on the commercials he made after he retired. I was also a big McEnroe fan because of his artistry as a tennis player.

* According to the NYT obit he failed the Army’s mental ability test which I’m assuming is NYT speak for IQ test. It was only after the minimum score was lowered that he became eligible to be drafted.

* Muhammad Ali strikes me as evidence that Jensen’s “Level 1″ intelligence is better understood as heuristic-based or subconscious processing than as literal recall. Ali could be insightful, even creative, within a narrow band of topics and situations, but presumably had no ability to abstract outside that, the Level 2 intelligence that IQ tests evaluate. I also think there might be some tradeoffs between fast visual processing of 3D objects and fast 2D processing, that might have made him especially predisposed to illiteracy. The IQ test was correct as far as it went, but everything’s not IQ.

My wife saw him in Times Square once- the stretch limo pulls up, the window goes down, an enormous head with a big smile leans out, the crowd of people waiting to cross 42nd street goes suddenly wild.

Roger Ebert’s essay about watching Rocky 2 with Ali is quite good, and doesn’t have the hagiographic quality that things written more recently have.

* His celebrity status helped popularize the so-called ‘Black Muslims’, a hate white people group who preached that whites were literally the devil. It’s believed this group spawned murder cults such as the Zebra murderers and others across the country. The NOI (Nation of Islam), currently headed by Farrakhan has been on public access television at various slots for years in the Chicago area. This would never have been tolerated were it to be a white nationalist type group but blacks always get a pass no matter. The nasty taunting of Frazier for being darker is a window to the inherent race obsessions of blacks, such as light vs dark feelings and other forms of hating everybody. Generally, the vast majority of blacks are united in their hatred of whitey and masochistic, simpering whites just suck it up and ask for more.

* Ali was punchy long before Parkinson’s set in. Back in the 80s and 90s Howard Stern would have Frazier into the studio for interviews and would joke between them how dopey Ali was, how dazed in later days Ali was and snicker about how Frazier beat Ali stupid. Ali was brain dead and underwater for decades.

Ali kicked off everything that is idiotic about Black athletes today and rare indeed is the Black sports star who, in the end zone, acts as if he’s been there before, as they say. Ali was also the beginning of the era of Black-Man-Does-No-Wrong-That-We-Print-Or-Portray media. Ali was the beginning of the tolerance of Black-onWhite racism and the beginning of the shuttling aside of a man’s moral and intellectual shortfalls because of his Black skin, especially if he was a celebrity. Little known factlet, 4 wives, by various accounts from seven to a dozen children that we know of, and dozens or hundreds of groupies, a particularly egregious record, even for Blacks in the 60s and 70s. From Ali onward, are you Black? Promiscuous? Unsupported children? No problem, just a Black thing. You wouldn’t understand. It all started down the hill with Ali.

* ‘Ali was, in the words of famed sportswriter Frank Deford, “the original trash talker.” He liberated athletes in most sports (other than golf) from the code of the British gentleman.’

No. He liberated blacks from the oppressive chains of good sportsmanship. White athletes, for the most part, still display good sportsmanship no matter the sport.

* If Ali had a low IQ then this seems to clearly demonstrate in an HBD sense blacks folk’s have something else that compensates to some extent. A white person with the same IQ could not riff like that. Rappers can be pretty clever with the phrases too. Mike Tyson seems to be kind of an idiot yet insightful at the same time. Low IQ whites are just dull. What is going on?

* Right, blacks seem to be more talkative than most people, and they have a tendency to string together words and phrases they pick up from the environment into utterances that don’t make much sense semantically or logically. The words and phrases seem to be put together for the purposes of sound and rhythm.

A lot of sports broadcasting and commentary is now virtually unwatchable because they tend to have black commentators on every panel and broadcasting crew. It’s embarrassing and cringe inducing to watch. Cable news is increasingly like this as well, although not as bad yet. They now tend to always include one or more black commentators.

* If you spend any time around black people, you will hear a lot of very amusing and entertaining trash talk. When I was younger and more naive, I knew a very witty black woman obviously much brighter than her black peers. I was amazed when she showed me the DFS paperwork relating to her having lost custody of her children. Her IQ was listed as 99. I couldn’t believe it was so low. In retrospect, it seems spot on to me.

* After Ali won the title again in 1974, it became “In” to hero-worship him. I recall in 1976, Ali was on CBS Face the Nation, of all things. A reporter asked him who he favored in the Presidential race. Ali said he liked Gerald Ford, who had invited him to the White House, which Ali liked very much.

I was a bit surprised, but that’s what he said. I believe Ali endorsed Reagan in 1984.

* The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica had a different explanation. Interestingly, this section has been expunged from some of the on-line versions.

Mentally the negro is inferior to the white. The remark of F. Manetta, made after a long study of the negro in America, may be taken as generally true of the whole race: “the negro children were sharp, intelligent and full of vivacity, but on approaching the adult period a gradual change set in. The intellect seemed to become clouded, animation giving place to a sort of lethargy, briskness yielding to indolence. We must necessarily suppose that the development of the negro and white proceeds on different lines. While with the latter the volume of the brain grows with the expansion of the brainpan, in the former the growth of the brain is on the contrary arrested by the premature closing of the cranial sutures and lateral pressure of the frontal bone.

* The late David Halberstam thought Ali had the most astute analysis of the Vietnam War of anyone. Halberstam also declared Ali sacrificed more due to the war than anyone.

An example of the fawning over blacks, and Ali in particular, common to people (literary and otherwise) of Halberstam’s milieu.

Posted in America | Comments Off on ‘Trump is a White version of Ali.’

Google: We’re Not Rigging ‘Crooked Hillary’ Searches

Breitbart: The all-powerful Internet search engine company Google says that it is not rigging its system to reduce the visibility of the term “Crooked Hillary.”

Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land discovered that there is no Automatic Recommendation in the Google Search bar for “Crooked Hillary.” In contrast,”Lying Ted” comes up as a recommendation as soon as people started typing “Lying.”

Is Google, led by chairman and major Clinton booster Eric Schmidt, trying to keep “Crooked Hillary” from going viral in the same damaging way as Trump’s other nicknames?

COMMENTS:

* I tested on Bing and Yahoo searches and they tried to complete “crooked Hillary” for me. So the google organization is obfuscating and lying.

Posted in Google, Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on Google: We’re Not Rigging ‘Crooked Hillary’ Searches

I Love Going To Writer Parties

A friend of a friend once said at a party that her husband’s occupation was “writing literature.”

Posted in English | Comments Off on I Love Going To Writer Parties

What is neo-reaction?

Tyler Cowan writes:

Here is a list of propositions, noting that these are an intellectualized summary of a somewhat imagined collective doctrine, and certainly not a statement of my own views:
1. “Culturism” is in general correct, namely that some cultures are better than others. You want to make sure you are ruled by one of the better cultures. In any case, one is operating with a matrix of rule.
2. The historical ruling cultures for America and Western Europe — two very successful regions — have largely consisted of white men and have reflected the perspectives of white men. This rule and influence continues to work, however, because it is not based on either whiteness or maleness per se. There is a nominal openness to the current version of the system, which fosters competitive balance, yet at the end of the day it is still mostly about the perspectives of white men and one hopes this will continue. By the way, groups which “become white” in their outlooks can be allowed into the ruling circle.
3. Today there is a growing coalition against the power and influence of (some) white men, designed in part to lower their status and also to redistribute their wealth. This movement may not be directed against whiteness or maleness per se (in fact some of it can be interpreted as an internal coup d’etat within the world of white men), but still it is based on a kind of puking on what made the West successful. And part and parcel of this process is an ongoing increase in immigration to further build up and cement in the new coalition. Furthermore a cult of political correctness makes it very difficult to defend the nature of the old coalition without fear of being called racist; in today’s world the actual underlying principles of that coalition cannot be articulated too explicitly. Most of all, if this war against the previous ruling coalition is not stopped, it will do us in.
4. It is necessary to deconstruct and break down the current dialogue on these issues, and to defeat the cult of political correctness, so that a) traditional rule can be restored, and/or b) a new and more successful form of that rule can be introduced and extended. Along the way, we must realize that calls for egalitarianism, or for that matter democracy, are typically a power play of one potential ruling coalition against another.
5. Neo-reaction is not in love with Christianity in the abstract, and in fact it fears its radical, redistributive, and egalitarian elements. Neo-reaction is often Darwinian at heart. Nonetheless Christianity-as-we-find-it-in-the-world often has been an important part of traditional ruling coalitions, and thus the thinkers of neo-reaction are often suspicious of the move toward a more secular America, which they view as a kind of phony tolerance.
6. If you are analyzing political discourse, ask the simple question: is this person puking on the West, the history of the West, and those groups — productive white males — who did so much to make the West successful? The answer to that question is very often more important than anything else which might be said about the contributions under consideration.

…The most significant neo-reaction thinker today probably is Steve Sailer, who often comments on this blog in addition to writing his own.

COMMENTS:

* Steve Sailer: Reaction is less of a political philosophy than an art form, one conducive to creating the best satire. …
Personally, I’m a realist reformer in the tradition of Benjamin Franklin. But Franklin, while amusing, wasn’t as enduringly comic as, say, the reactionary Swift.

>Conservatism is a strain of liberalism.
Reaction is that part of conservatism that is *not* a strain of liberalism.

Sailer: That’s an interesting question: whether the right has much self-awareness except in response to the left?
Burke, for example, was mostly a little left of center Whig (e.g., wanted to reconcile with the Americans and less exploit the Hindus) until challenged by the French Revolution to define his position as a conservative.
Similarly, Conservative Judaism was a quite late innovation of the 19th Century.
The postmodernist argument that Hinduism didn’t exist as a self-aware entity until confronted by, say, Buddhism or Islam or Christianity is glib, but still interesting.

I’m not particularly inclined toward political philosophy, but I did outline citizenism a decade ago:

“It’s important to note that citizenism applies to present citizens, “to ourselves and our Posterity” as the Preamble to the Constitution says. In this, the demands of citizenism are analogous to the fiduciary duty of corporate managers.
When I was getting an MBA many years ago, I was the favorite of an acerbic old finance professor because he could count on me to blurt out all the stupid misconceptions to which overconfident students are prone. One day he asked the class: “If you were running a publicly traded company, would it be acceptable for you to create new stock and sell it for less than it was worth?”
““Sure,” I smugly announced. “Our legal duty is to maximize our stockholders’ wealth. While selling the stock for less than it’s worth would harm our present shareholders, it would benefit our new shareholders who buy the underpriced stock, so it all comes out in the wash. Right?”
““Wrong!” He thundered. “Your obligation is to your current shareholders, not to somebody who might buy the stock in the future.”
“That same logic applies to the valuable right to live in America. Just as the managers of a public company have a responsibility to the existing stockholders not to diminish the value of their shares by selling new ones too cheaply to outsiders, our politicians have a moral obligation to the current citizens and their descendants to preserve the scarcity value of their right to live in America.
“The American people’s traditional patrimony of relatively high wages and low land prices, the legacy of a lightly populated landscape, has made this a blessedly middle-class country. Uncontrolled immigration, however, by driving up the supply of labor and the demand for housing is importing Latin American levels of inequality into immigrant-inundated states such as California.”

* Steve Sailer is definitely the most prominent person on the alt right. Moldbug is really just another technocrat, while the real energies on the alt right are with questions of race, religion etc.

* “We should not oppress other races, but we should not oppress our own minds either.”
Well said.
The conventional wisdom appears to be that that’s impossible — either we must whip our minds or whip our slaves — but I’m deeply skeptical of that assumption. I think it’s quite possible to work out a win-win solution via Burkean prudence.
Obviously, however, the first step when you find yourself in a hole is to stop digging. Granted, the conventional wisdom is to dig harder, but that just seems kind of hysterical.

My impression is that the growth of a culture of individuals on the Aspergers / autism / nerdism spectrum is one of the most unexpected and significant of my lifetime, but the cause, whether nature, nurture, or merely perception, remains uncertain.

Posted in Alt Right, Dark Enlightenment | Comments Off on What is neo-reaction?

‘Red State’ Editors Support Democrat Mob Attacks on American Trump Supporters: ‘Deserve to be Beaten’

From Breitbart: Embittered “#NeverTrump” consultants and bloggers are ragging on American voters who support presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, telling them they “deserve to be beaten,” as Americans are chased down and assaulted for merely attending a U.S. political rally.

Neil Stevens, a contributing editor to the “Red State” blog, believes that Americans should be attacked by Mexicans for supporting a candidate who promises to enforce U.S. immigration laws.

Stevens complained Trump supporters “deserve to be beaten” by Democrat hordes and illegal aliens burning the American flag, and that Trump is a “Nazi.”

Similarly, “Red State” contributing editor Ben Howe sneered at a woman who supported Trump attacked by a mob:

Like most of the “Never Trump” lickspittles, Stevens and Howe appear to exhibit aggressiveness mostly towards voters who protest against mass illegal immigration and the severe criminal, cultural, and economic problems it brings to America.

How any state in America can exist a “red state” after uncontrolled Third World migration takes place remains unclear.

Posted in America | Comments Off on ‘Red State’ Editors Support Democrat Mob Attacks on American Trump Supporters: ‘Deserve to be Beaten’

Let’s Make Pico-Robertson Great Again!

Friend: “Truth be told, I hate that place. I hate Pico, it’s dirty, overcrowded, smoggy and I don’t like most of the people there. The only good thing is walking distance to shul and convenience of kosher items. I’m also tired of “orthodoxy” in general. It seems more like an “act” that people like to play over their beards and wigs, but under their hypocrisy and insensitive emotions. Sadly, people act like “Pico” is the bright light of the country….the place to be. All its bug infested 6 blocks strip of land. A world wonder.”

Posted in Pico/Robertson | Comments Off on Let’s Make Pico-Robertson Great Again!

Under-Earning Thinking

I just spotted some of my under-earning thinking. As I was reaching into my pocket for my keys, I found myself thinking, “Wouldn’t it be cool if they weren’t there so I would have to knock on the door and somebody would take care of me.”

At other times, I have the thought, “Wouldn’t it be cool if I collapse so someone will take care of me.”

Or, “Now they’ll really have to take care of me.”

From ACA: The Problem

Many of us found that we had several characteristics in common as a result of being brought up in an alcoholic or dysfunctional household. We had come to feel isolated and uneasy with other people, especially authority figures. To protect ourselves, we became people-pleasers, even though we lost our own identities in the process. All the same we would mistake any personal criticism as a threat. We either became alcoholics (or practiced other addictive behavior) ourselves, or married them, or both. Failing that, we found other compulsive personalities, such as a workaholic, to fulfill our sick need for abandonment.

We lived life from the standpoint of victims. Having an overdeveloped sense of responsibility, we preferred to be concerned with others rather than ourselves. We got guilt feelings when we stood up for ourselves rather than giving in to others. Thus, we became reactors, rather than actors, letting others take the initiative. We were dependent personalities, terrified of abandonment, willing to do almost anything to hold on to a relationship in order not to be abandoned emotionally. Yet we kept choosing insecure relationships because they matched our childhood relationship with alcoholic or dysfunctional parents.

These symptoms of the family disease of alcoholism or other dysfunction made us “co-victims”, those who take on the characteristics of the disease without necessarily ever taking a drink. We learned to keep our feelings down as children and kept them buried as adults. As a result of this conditioning, we confused love with pity, tending to love those we could rescue. Even more self-defeating, we became addicted to excitement in all our affairs, preferring constant upset to workable relationships.

This is a description, not an indictment.

Posted in Addiction | Comments Off on Under-Earning Thinking

Muhammad Ali: Never the White Man’s Negro

America and blacks are far better off for this aggressive change in attitude, right?

New York Times: “In Chicago over Memorial Day weekend, 64 people were shot, six fatally.”

Joyce Carol Oates writes:

When Muhammad Ali was a young man, the best black boxers were expected to be cautious and restrained. But Ali would have none of it….

White male anxieties were, evidently, greatly roiled by the spectacle of the strong black man, and had to be assuaged. The greater the black boxer (Joe Louis, Archie Moore, Ezzard Charles), the more urgent that he assume a public role of caution and restraint. Kindly white men who advised their black charges to be a “credit to their race” were not speaking ironically.

And yet, the young Cassius Clay/Muhammad Ali refused to play this emasculating role. He would not be the “white man’s Negro” — he would not be anything of the white man’s at all. Converting to the Nation of Islam at the age of 22, immediately after winning the heavyweight championship from Sonny Liston, he denounced his “slave name” (Cassius Marcellus Clay, which was also his father’s name) and the Christian religion; in refusing to serve in the Army he made his political reasons clear: “I ain’t got no quarrel with them Vietcong.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Muhammad Ali: Never the White Man’s Negro

Muhammad Ali’s IQ

From VDARE: A few thoughts apropos of Steve Sailer’s post, which included Muhammad Ali’s IQ, 75 and linked to Phillippe Rushton’s piece, which explained how mystified college professors are when seemingly engaged, prepared, intelligent, garrulous and entertaining black students fail objective tests that measure learning.

Rushton called this the “winning personality,” and I called it a “cocktail party personality” in my piece about newsman Vester Flanagan’s murder of two white colleagues, who worked with him at a television station in Roanoke, Va.

Also linking back to Rushton, the piece explained that many blacks in the news business are in over their heads; that is, they are mismatched, meaning hired for jobs that do not match their skills or intelligence. They are hired not only because of affirmative action but also because they possess that winning or cocktail party personality. The most successful black journalist I’ve hired was quite the opposite. He was surly and morose. He did not have a winning personality.

Anyway, when self-awareness kicks in, and a black employee realizes he cannot do the job, the first instinct, particularly given the anti-white hate the media spew every day, is to blame whitey. Then, to maim or kill. The Man must be punished.

Of course, the glib Muhammed Ali achieved great success, despite his IQ of 75, which psychiatrists call “borderline intellectual functioning” and is just a notch above mildly retarded. Such an IQ used to be called “borderline deficiency” and was only a hair above what the professionals used to call a moron.

One wonders what would have happened to Ali if he hadn’t been a boxer, but instead had been pushed through college and into a job requiring even moderate intelligence. In the ring, he had only to fight and could release his frustrations. In college and then an office, he would have had to think, and would have been frustrated much of the day.

Would that have led to another Disgruntled Minority Massacre?

COMMENTS AT STEVE SAILER:

* Even as far back as 1996 (google his interview with Ed Bradley), Ali could barely mutter a few words.

I wonder how Ali (when he was young) would’ve reacted if he was a shown a video of himself as an older man.

* M.A. in 1971 – Life is too short for me to be catching hell for something like that, I’d rather be with my own, and have a beautiful daughter, beautiful wife, both look like me and we are all happy and I don’t have no trouble. I ain’t that in love with no women to go through all that hell, there’s no one woman that good. You understand?

Interviewer – I understand, I do understand, I think it’s sad ….

M.A. – (Interrupting) It ain’t sad because I want my child to look like me, every intelligent person wants their child to look like them, I’m sad because I want to blot out my race and lose my identity? Chinese love Chinese they love the little slanty eye, pretty brown skin babies. Pakistani love their culture, Jewish people love their culture, a lot of catholic wanna be with Catholics and want the religion to stay the same… who would want to spot up yourself and kill your race? You’re a hater of your people if you don’t want to stay who you are. You ashamed of what god made you? You think he made a mistake when he made you?

Interviewer – I think that’s a philosophy of despair, I really do

M.A. – Philosophy of despair? Here let me tell you, listen. No woman on this earth, not even a black woman in Muslim countries can please me and cook for me and socialize with me like my American black woman, no woman, and last is a white woman… can really identify with me and my feelings, and the way I act, and the way I talk…. it’s just nature, you can do what you want, but it’s nature to want to be with your own, I want to be with my own.

Posted in Blacks, IQ, Race | Comments Off on Muhammad Ali’s IQ

Trump & The Judge II

Bill Kristol tweets: “Simple question for the sophisticated accommodators of Trump: Why aren’t Trump’s comments on Judge Curiel simply disqualifying?”

John Rivers replies: “La Raza is a racial advocacy group. Hey, Bill, are you in any racial advocacy groups?

It’s fine for hispanics to be in groups called The Race. What’s racist is for white people to notice.

It’s so racist to notice that a judge is in a racial advocacy group called The Race. Disgusting!”

Peter Brimelow writes:

Of Course Trump Is Right About Minority Judges—Remember The “Wise Latina”?

The more I think about it, the more I like James Kirkpatrick‘s contention that the Main Stream Media, not the Democratic Party or any political organization, is now the Official Keeper (and enforcer) of the Cultural Marxist Narrative. A few moments ago, I googled on “Wise Latina + “Donald Trump” and found that there’s only one (1) reference: WashPost Unleashes on Trump, The Mexican-American Judge, and the ‘Wise Latina’, by Jeffrey Lord (whom we’ve praised before), Newsbusters, June 4, 2016:

Let’s recall that the Washington Post endorsed then-federal judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court. During her confirmation hearings it came to light that Sotomayor regularly gave some version of the following quote in her speeches:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion.”

Got that? Sotomayor was explicitly saying that her view of judicial decision-making was related not to the law and the Constitution but her ethnic/racial heritage as a “wise Latina.”

And yet? And yet the Washington Post endorsed that, in this editorial headlined: “Confirm Sonia Sotomayor.”

It takes an impressive amount of discipline to avoid noticing that, if a Supreme Court Justice openly congratulates herself for making decisions based on her race, Donald Trump has every reason to be concerned about the impartiality of a professional Mexican like U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel.

VDARE.com has long argued that, given the U.S. now has legislating judges, they should be compelled to face elections i.e. impeachment. If you follow that link, you will see that a high proportion of the legislating judges we have exposed have been various sorts of minorities. (There is the occasional honorable exception).

Diversity is not strength, and it above all is not an impartial judiciary. That requires a degree of cultural consensus that post-1965 immigration policy has destroyed.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump & The Judge II