How can we stop dumb people from driving?

Psychometrician Linda Gottfredson wrote in 2004: “IQ was the best predictor of the major cause of death, motor vehicle accidents. Vehicular death rates doubled and then tripled at successively lower IQ ranges (100–115, 85–100, 80–85; O’Toole, 1990).”

Perhaps no drivers licenses for people with IQs under 100?

Chaim Amalek writes: “A dangerous slippery slope. What else would you deny us under-100 IQ folk? The right to keep and bear arms? The right to vote? The right to procreate? The right to immigrate? WHERE DOES IT END? What about the right to blog? Or to comment on someone else’s blog? The only way to stop them from driving in America is to hire cleverer foreigners to drive them around at taxpayer expense until such time as Google perfects driverless cars.”

Posted in Cars, Health, IQ | Comments Off on How can we stop dumb people from driving?

When Did I Board The Trump Express?

On June 16, 2015, when Donald Trump announced he was running for president, a friend of mine listened to his speech on the radio. When we met up that morning, he told that I would love Donald Trump. He was saying all the things I was saying about problems such as illegal immigration.

That morning, I had no enthusiasm for the Donald. I didn’t take him seriously. I thought he was a joke. I dismissed my friend’s comments.

On June 28, 2015, my friend Khunrum emailed my email Advisory Committee:

unnamed

Robert: “Sorry. My vote belongs to Larry Flynt.”

Fred: “There was an interesting item in the news–apparently, Trump hired a bunch of actors (extras) to show up and cheer at his announcement that he was running for president. This guy is a real piece of work.”

Robert: “I thought I saw Ron Jeremy in the back waving a sign… Shameless!”

Khunrum: “This must be a celebrity thing…I swear I saw Caitlyn Jenner.”

Robert: “It was a cross promotion for Trump’s new show Lady Boy Apprentis.”

Chaim Amalek: “He’s the only man running who understands our immigration problem and is willing to talk about it. Deep in your heart you know he’s right.”

Khunrum: “If the Don comes in second in a primary or two or even wins one they won’t able to keep him out of the debates. Donald debating the other is something I’d love to see.”

Fred: “Oh, the debates will certainly be interesting to watch.”

Robert: “They should show the debate on Comedy Central.”

Khunrum: “We’re doing our part to keep the laughs rolling here in Texas…We have our former dumbbell governor Rick Perry running (for your entertainment pleasure) and the “intellectual” in the Bush family, brother Jeb. Then there’s Rick Santorum who brought a dead baby home…plus The Donald and others….it’s going to be a gas! gas! gas!”

I didn’t bother to join this email discussion.

On July 4, 2015, I made my first mention of “Donald Trump” on Facebook and Twitter by quoting this from a friend: “The outrage over Trump’s comments is interesting to watch; I’ve seen no one actually try to refute his statement on the facts.”

That same night, I posted: “Until Trump came along all the candidates were avoiding the issue including that prancing clown Walker who was caught several times showing his open borders bonafides.”

I was skeptical that Donald Trump was for real, but I started a “Donald Trump” category on my blog July 9, 2015. From that date on, I guess, I was aboard the Trump Express.

I did not mention Trump on my Facebook from July 4 until July 17, 2015, when I liked this Youtube video (Donald Trump FULL Press Conference with families of people killed by illegal aliens). The same day I liked another video (this one by American Renaissance) entitled, “Why Donald Trump Is Leading the Pack.”

On July 14, in a private FB chat, I wrote: “blowhard trump is tapping into WN sentiments.”

On July 19, I posted on FB a comment I read (probably in the comments section of Steve Sailer’s blog):

Trump could say: “Look, I respect everyone who served, captured or not. But back when America was great and we won wars, our heroes were men who did the capturing, like Alvin York. Let’s make America great again!”

On July 21, I posted on FB a comment I read (probably in the comments section of Steve Sailer’s blog):

“John McCain called Donald Trump supporters a bunch of crazy people. Why are Donald Trump supporters crazy? Because they want to see immigration levels in this country reduced and want to secure our border. John McCain is a shill for cheap 3rd world labor. On Fox And Friends last night they reported that the U.S government lets in over 120,000 Muslim immigrants into the U.S every year. And people wonder why homegrown Islamic terrorism on U.S soil is becoming more common. Why do we need that many Muslims entering the U.S every year? What not enough Falafel restaurants in this country? John McCain talks about how he is concerned about radical Islam becoming a growing threat on U.S soil, but yet he never points the blame on our country’s disastrous immigration system that lets in so many immigrants from Muslim countries who hate America.”

On July 23, 2015, I posted on FB a comment I read (probably in the comments section of Steve Sailer’s blog):

“Trump has pushed the Overton Window so wide, its gaping hole resembles Andrew “RawMuscleGlutes” Sullivan’s prolapsing rectum.”

On July 30, 2015, I posted on FB a comment by a friend:

Trump can win the nomination for sure, unless he does a Perot and runs from his possible destiny. He has a shot at winning the election in November against HRC especially if he points out that a rise in Hispanic power = fall in Black prospects. Whites + Blacks can put Trump in the Oval Office. I don’t know of any other Republican I could vote for. Certainly not Bush. I’d much much rather have Bernie Saunders as president than Bush.

That same day, I posted:

“In Trump’s case, he appears to be cornering the market on white voters, the backbone of the current Republican Party, the poll shows. Republicans need as many white votes as possible to offset demographic shifts in the United States that have handed Democrats an electoral advantage in the last two presidential elections.”

That same day, I posted something I read:

“The term’s connotations are racist. By alluding to a genre of porn in which passive white husbands watch their wives have sex with black men, it casts its targets as impotent defenders of white people in America. Prominent “cuckservatives” include Jeb Bush, John McCain, and Marco Rubio, politicians who have, in the imagination of the term’s promulgators, adopted a false — liberal — consciousness to appeal to the shifting opinions of the American electorate. In this narrative, the anti-cuckservative hero is Donald Trump, who is unafraid to speak a racially inconvenient truth about the dire trajectory of white men.”

On July 31, 2015, I posted:

Manly men are for Donald Trump! Girly men are for Jeb Bush. As my rebbe Chaim Amalek says to the sodomites: “You do not understand the yearnings of the Heterosexual Christian American Man, be he White or Black. Thus, you and many others are in for a surprise or two as the election season unfolds.”

That same day, I posted a comment from Steve Sailer’s blog:

“Trump once told Esquire, “You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.” That’s the kind of winning attitude they like in a leader south of the border.”

A couple of minutes later, I posted from Sailer’s blog:

“Countries where the men still dominate the women don’t face the same existential issues of fertility and border control. DUH. Ladies loved Cecil the Lion!!! His masculinity and dominance elevated him to regal status in the feminine mind. Watch Trump (or somebody like Trump) win the woman vote in 2016.”

And this:

“If some confident and unapologetic person like Trump were to announce that kicking out illegals and stopping mass legal immigration is a litmus test of national loyalty, I think we’d be pleasantly surprised by the number of blacks responding to that nativist appeal and the number of viva-la-raza triumphalists who would find it prudent to shut the hell up. (And, of course, the number of whites voting to save their country.)”

On August 3, I did these retweets:

* David Frum: “Immigration is not the sole reason for the Trump surge, but it is the factor GOP leaders most dislike to acknowledge”

* Mickey Kaus: “Note to Team@realDonaldTrump: Study 1st @Schwarzenegger debate. Funny, firm putdowns. Forceful. Won the day for him.”

On August 4, I posted this quote from Sailer’s blog:

“Scott Walker is another example of a top tier Republican candidate who has all the charisma of a Midwestern vacuum cleaner salesman. Unless Trump stumbles and self-destructs over the next six months, this race increasingly looks like it is going to be a blowout.”

On August 6, I posted a link to Chateau Heartiste with this quote:

“American wife, mother and entrepreneur.” This is how Trump’s HB9 daughter Ivanka describes herself. As a commenter said, note the order. When a daughter happily describes herself first and foremost as an American wife and mother, you know her father is an alpha male. Trump for President. “Make America Alpha Again”

On August 7, I posted a comment from Sailer’s blog:

“It’s pathetic for the party leaders to simultaneously trash the leading, most popular candidate and then question him for his loyalty to them. Trump owes nothing to Reince Preibus and the others, and pledging today to support the eventual winner (who may be ¡Jeb! who comes out for amnesty after securing the nomination) is neither wise nor honest. Trump himself said he doesn’t know his plans–if say a Ted Cruz or Scott Walker secures the nomination and campaigns strongly on illegal immigration and trade (and acts diplomatically toward Trump), I’m sure Donald would bless the nomination and back the GOP candidate. Spinning Trump’s personality traits against him only works if you disregard that he’s also confident, assertive, and patriotic. He gets things done. He knows Mexico is getting the better of us on immigration, China on trade, Japan on imports, etc. His ego is useful in fighting for American jobs and sovereignty issues. It’s hilarious you’d think Trump would waste millions of his own dollars, countless hours, and intense media critique so that he’d be the fall guy for the estranged wife of one of his golfing buddies. Way to read normal human behavior, bro. Yeah that sounds like a typical endeavor for a brash, cocky businessman who even you admit is “self-promoting.””

I then wrote: “The New York Times is an essential read, and the best newspaper in America by a mile. Hilarious article on Trump.”

I then quoted from Sailer’s blog:

“Trump’s best line so far: “If you don’t have a real border, you don’t have a country.” He needs to say it over and over.”

I linked to a VDARE Ann Coulter piece on Trump.

I posted:

Friend: “I don’t understand Ivanka Trump’s Orthodox Judaism”
Luke: “It was a hurdle to marry. There are many paths to the one true God.”

I liked this Youtube video: “Creepy Trump Tells Apprentice Contestant, “Must Be a Pretty Picture, You Dropping to

On August 8, 2015, I posted choice comments from Sailer’s blog:

* “They remind me physically and verbally of Rosie O’Donnell. Wish Trump had been there to say, “Shut up you slobs—by the way. Lay off the Cheetos. You’re pretty damned young to be so hefty.” That would have done my heart good.”

* “Donald Trump would have told them to pound sand and laughed. His refusal to back down to Megan Kelly took more balls than 99% of men can muster. The rest of the GOP field would have wilted and then started mumbling about how much they were against breast cancer or some other groveling gesture.”

On August 10, I posted from Sailer:

“Our rulers are dead afraid of any groundswell of popular political sentiment getting focused into a particular candidate and given voice. This is one reason Trump and Ron Paul have been so viciously attacked. Displays of populist passion don’t present a paradox with political assassination; they explain it. It’s always 1933-1945.”

I put Trump’s name in a headline for the first time August 15, 2015, with a post “Trump Has Game” excerpting Chateau Heartiste.

I made my first mention of “Donald Trump” in a personal Facebook chat on August 16, 2015. On August 17, I pronounced on FB and Twitter: “This election is Trump’s to lose. The powers that be will do everything they can to destroy him.”

On August 21, I watched Trump’s rally in Mobile that afternoon and my life forever changed. This man was for real. I was excited.

I posted on FB:

I’m watching Donald Trump live. He just said he comes from good genes. “Do you believe in genes? I believe in the gene thing.” Nature over nurture!”

On Saturday morning, August 22, 2015, I started telling people at shul that Trump could win and nobody believed me.

On August 23, I posted on FB: “When Donald Trump talks about the people who built this country, is he discussing the goyim or the coalition of the fringe (trannies, homos, blacks, Jews, etc)?”

On August 25, I posted:

* Oh, look, another Jew thinks it’s news that David Duke has an opinion about Trump. Is this a disconnect between Jewish journalism and Americans?

* “Luckily Trump isn’t a deep thinker paralyzed by complicated, or as the faux sophisticates say, complex issues. Mexicans are a lesser breed? Stop importing them! Simple. And more important not suicidal, a la every last position the sophisticates take.” (From Sailer’s blog)

* “Megan Kelly is Ailes/Murdoch PROXY. Wake the hell up. Fox tried to end Trump’s political career that night. There is no bigger opponent for Trump now. Exactly because Trump is an alpha with killer instinct is why he pursues his opponent relentlessly. Trump has the potential to do real damage to the Fox brand and Roger Ailes knows it.” (Sailer’s blog)

A search of my gmail account for “lukeisback” reveals I did not write the words “Donald Trump” in an email until Dec. 17.

Khunrum emails today:

The Donald is still making waves. First he rid us of Jeb Bush, the so called “intellectual” of the family. Actually I think dumb brother Dubya is smarter than Jeb. Then he gave a one two punch to that little weasel Rand Paul. Now he’s going after Hillary. It’s hilarious!

Robert: “It’s only funny until he wins. Then the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are released. Are you right with God, brothers? The time is at hand.”

Posted in Donald Trump, Personal | Comments Off on When Did I Board The Trump Express?

WP: “The quiet impact of Obama’s Christian faith. Why the president’s convictions led him to believe he could unite a divided country — and why he failed.

Comment: Is this an MSM attempt to temper the growing belief that B. Hussein Obama has pro-Islamic (and anti-Western) tendencies by trying to grounded them in Christian charity, i.e. “I know a lot of us are angry at the Muslims and jihad and massacres and all those things … but, as Christ said, ‘Father, forgive them … they know not what they do.’ If we’re not willing to forgive them and … well, go on as if nothing happened, are we really Christian?”

And I know the answer. The Muslims are doing what they are doing to us because we as a people are not Christian enough. We aren’t forgiving enough. WE need to try harder. This is satire, right?

Posted in Barack Obama | Comments Off on WP: “The quiet impact of Obama’s Christian faith. Why the president’s convictions led him to believe he could unite a divided country — and why he failed.

Vision Zero

Wikipedia:

Vision Zero is a multi-national road traffic safety project which aims to achieve a highway system with no fatalities or serious injuries in road traffic. It started in Sweden and was approved by their parliament in October 1997.[1] A core principle of the vision is that ‘Life and health can never be exchanged for other benefits within the society’ rather than the more conventional comparison between costs and benefits, where a monetary value is placed on life and health, and then that value is used to decide how much money to spend on a road network towards the benefit of decreasing how much risk.

Vision Zero is based on four principles:[3]

Ethics: Human life and health are paramount and take priority over mobility and other objectives of the road traffic system
Responsibility: providers and regulators of the road traffic system share responsibility with users;
Safety: road traffic systems should take account of human fallibility and minimize both the opportunities for errors and the harm done when they occur; and
Mechanisms for change: providers and regulators must do their utmost to guarantee the safety of all citizens; they must cooperate with road users; and all three must be ready to change to achieve safety.
Other principles were added to Vision Zero in order to ensure that motorists would comprehend the full extent of the movements purpose:[4]

Traffic deaths and injuries are preventable; therefore, none are acceptable.
·People will make mistakes; the transportation system should be designed so those mistakes aren’t fatal.
·Safety is the primary consideration in transportation decision-making.
Traffic safety solutions must be addressed holistically.

Vision Zero suggests the following “possible long term maximum travel speeds related to the infrastructure, given best practice in vehicle design and 100% restraint use”.[5] These speeds are based on human and automobile limits. For example, the human tolerance for a pedestrian hit by a well-designed car is approximately 30 km/h. If a higher speed in urban areas is desired, the option is to separate pedestrian crossings from the traffic. If not, pedestrian crossings, or zones (or vehicles), must be designed to generate speeds of a maximum of 30 km/h. Similarly, the inherent safety of well-designed cars can be anticipated to be a maximum of 70 km/h in frontal impacts, and 50 km/h in side impacts. Speeds over 100 km/h can be tolerated if the infrastructure is designed to prevent frontal and side impacts.

Posted in Cars | Comments Off on Vision Zero

Steve Sailer: Animal Spirits on the Highway?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The most important, and most expensive, safety feature is mass. Buy the biggest vehicle you can afford to buy gas for. Airbags, stability assist, anti – lock brakes are all pretty standard now. The only unsafe options sold currently are the little tiny boxes that would crumple like a tin can in an accident.

* At the end of the day Steve, it’s all about mass of the vehicle when it comes to safety. Last number I checked was that the average cars weight in 2010 was 4000lbs (it’s probably trending down now). It doesn’t matter if a ‘smart car’ (1800lbs) has a 5 star crash rating if it is run into by a 1992 F250 (6500lbs) with a 1 star rating driven by a Jose… Even though the trend it to make lighter and lighter vehicles (its even creeping into heavy equipment manufacturing) school buses (19,000lbs) still weigh a whole bunch, and mass is the easiest way to engineer safety.

I drive a 3600lb impala (24mpg) here in Houston and my wife drives her Yukon (5000lbs) with my kids in it, and if I had the funds I would send her and the girls out in an up armored HUMVEE for a number of reasons.

Most cars are pretty darn good right now, so in that regard find one that you like that has good reliability record and make sure it weighs as much as you can stand (i.e. afford). Fuel and tires are going to be more expensive of course, but it’s still cheaper than a ride in a helicopter to a hospital.

* There has been a big push by many large companies during that same period to improve driver safety by their employees and thus lower their corporate accident rates and insurance premiums.

My company starting from 2008 now makes us take mandatory on-line driver safety course modules and tests every year. If you don’t pass, you cannot drive a company vehicle or expense a rental car on company business or claim mileage. Further, if you get in an at fault accident at work you will likely now be fired, and every accident, even where you are rear-ended is now a cause for investigation.

My experience is that many people are now driving more safely because of this both at home and work, and that many people benefitted from the driver safety refreshers. Our corporate accident rates have plummeted.

I know this is going on at many companies in the engineering construction industry and also with many of our clients including industrial, petro-chemical, railroads, and more. I suspect it is a very widespread push.

I’ve also seen that some states are now mandating such testing after some traffic violation as a way to lighten the fines and avoiding getting points on your license.

* The burst of the Sand States housing bubble sent many mexican construction workers back home. Maybe that’s why the motor vehicle death rate took a dive at that time.

* Since I felt pretty safe (justifiably) decades ago driving cars which were far less safe in construction and standard (mandatory) equipment than the current models, I don’t think safety is an issue to consider in choosing a modern car. Put simply, the risks are so low and the objective (as oppose to relative) differences so marginal that it just isn’t worth devoting any concern to it.

* If women show their “empowerment’ when they reject all the men they don’t want in their lives, and the rejects have to accept it and go away, then why don’t whites show “empowerment” when we reject the presence of the world’s vagrants we don’t want in our communities and countries?

* Massachusetts increased restrictions on teen drivers around 2007 I believe, such as limiting them to no passengers under 21 in the first six months of driving. Not sure if other states have passed those rules. The stupidest driving I’ve ever done was as a teen with my friends in the car, so if other states followed MA’s example, it could explain it.

* I worked with 70 year old automotive engineers in the 1990′s who all said that just a few simple measures could radically reduce fatalities, but the industry won’t implement them. Like slower speed limits and uniform bumper heights for all vehicles.

* Miles driven went down slightly during the downturn, but it triggered something much bigger. I remember my daily commute going from 1 hour to 20 minutes and talking to coworkers about it. They all saw the same thing. We were all wondering if the economy was really dropping faster then we were being led to believe. The highways in our city were about half full compared to the usual level. Then I read about congestion studies. at just the right levels, a 5-10% drop in the number of daily drivers can result in a 50% drop in the number of cars on the road at any given time. So miles driven dropped slightly, but hours on the road dropped a lot, and number of cars on the road dropped a lot. I could see that saving a lot of lives.

* Cash for clunkers was a Krugman style “pay people to dig holes and lay them to fill them” economic policy so early in the idiocy and scandal sheet of Obama that you’ve forgotten it.

But it did encourage people to get rid of cars that had no airbags. There are no older used cars available anymore. Cash for clunkers took them all away, and people sooner or later, had to replace them with newer cars. The used car market now has all of the major safety improvements like air bags, aide curtain air bags, anti lock brakes.

* What’s interesting about that graphic is that drug overdoses are soaring, but car deaths are declining. In other words, drug use seems to be up (at least pill popping and heroin use anyway) but the addicts aren’t taking their habits out on the rest of us on the road. They’re quietly medicating themselves to death in their domiciles. So to them I offer a hearty thanks!

As for safety features, I think the more bells and whistles that are in your car, the more distracted you become. I recently test drove a 2016 Focus and was rather alarmed at the cockpit. Buttons, gizmos everywhere. The backup camera doesn’t help you when someone is coming at you from the side, only when there’s a stationary object within the camera’s field. Most of these “safety” features unfortunately are aimed at women drivers, who are the real menaces on the road. Ellen Brody comes to mind.

* I can think of a few reasons why road fatalities have gone down. Demographically speaking, the majority of our population consists of the Baby Boomers, and they’re moving into their retirement years. Older people drive smarter than young people, or at least they do until they start becoming senile.

The Cash-for-Clunkers scheme shrank the used-car market dramatically, removing a lot of ‘starter’ cars from the road that the poor used to buy. Consequently, the poor have been forced to take the bus because the price of new cars is so high they can’t afford one.

The price of gas was bouncing around 4 bucks a gallon for a long time, the most expensive it’s ever been, and more people have been staying off the road because of it.

A lot of people have acquired video games, home computers, internet, cell phones, DVD players, big screen TVs, etc., and a lot of bored guys who used to pile into their cars and go joyriding around town looking for action are now at home playing video games, surfing the internet, or watching movies rented from Redbox.

And finally, if you’re the sort of person who couldn’t make your house payments, then you couldn’t make your car payments, either. People who lost their houses in the crash also had their cars repossessed. They also ended taking the bus. This is why owning a car in the ghetto is a bragging point.

In sum, if you can get the poor and dumb off the road, you’ll have fewer accidents. Smart people drive more safely.

* I have a suspicion that the rise in white death rate from opiod overdose has something to do with the medical profession being swarmed by Indian and Pakistani Dr Feelgoods. Immigrant doctors gravitate to the less desirable medical practices but make a lot of money double billing Medicare and Medicaid and have no empathy for their elderly, mentally ill, or financially distressed patients, especially if they are white.

* The pursuit of a career in the Medical profession for Asian/Oriental communities is mostly about status and money, so they will want to get rid of their clients as quick as possible with as little fuss as possible, ergo just prescribe SSRIs or whatever makes the patient feel good and out of the way.

Since Indian/Pakistani doctors come from a culture that doesn’t even care about the less fortunate amongst them, why would they have empathy for White, Black or Hispanic American patients.

* 1) Going from subcompact to compact to midsize yields big safety improvements. The safety improvements really taper off (or go negative!) above mid-size. One of the reasons for that is not obvious: lower volume sales cars have fewer safety features because the car companies trick out the high volume sellers with more options. Mid-size is a very competitive market. Mid-size looks safer than full size. But look at the newer IIHS scores on full size since they’ve improved. Impala has 5 bar score for automated crash prevention for example. Taurus is only 1 bar.

2) SUVs really are safer on average. But some cars do as well as SUVs in death rates.

3) Within a segment the death rates vary greatly. But some have fewer cars sold and so less statistically significant. You need to consider the crash tests too.

4) Rollover death rates are really low. Don’t worry too much about 4 and 5 stars for NHTSA or IIHS roof tests. Electronic stabilization control has made rollovers much less common even among SUVs.

* A quick and dirty test might be to ask yourself, “how would this car hold up if it were T-boned by a speeding SUV?” Getting T-boned is how a lot of people die, or are maimed. The red light runners you don’t expect. That might readjust your decision to buy a cute mini-cooper.

In Steve’s case, since he’s tall, his question might be, “when I sit in this car, is my left leg above, level, or below the steering column?”

He’ll want it to be below the steering column, since if he’s hit hard from the side, the door collapses against his leg, taking it into the steering column turning what was once a functional leg, a bloody goo. Having his leg below the steering column allows it to move towards the center of the car in the event of an ugly side-collision, instead of being crushed between the door and steering column.

The auto collision warning system is a great feature, since it will chirp or gently ring if some problem seems afoot, just like your wife, without the added feature of screaming like a maniac when everything’s under control, like many, many wives.

* As a fellow resident of the metropolitan LA area I like having all the safety technology I can afford. Driving on our freeways and surface streets is very challenging and, as a reminder, you’re not getting any younger, Steve.

We recently bought two Subarus, a 2015 Outback and a 2015 Crosstrek, because they have a lot of safety features and great safety ratings (and reviews) at a very decent price. Both our cars have Eyesight, which is the pre-collision/lane departure system. It has pre-collision warning/braking/throttle management and adaptive cruise control. My husband’s favorite feature is the adaptive cruise control. My sister commutes weekly between states for her job and also loves adaptive cc on her Audi Q7. I’ve had the pre-collision warning give me a heads up on traffic slowing a couple of time when I wasn’t paying close attention on the freeway so I like it a lot. It won’t detect you running into something as narrow as a telephone pole, as someone above noted, but it should have detected the dumpster in his story. The commenter probably wasn’t going fast enough to trigger the system. As for getting inured to the warning beeps, you don’t. The lane departure doesn’t alert as long as you signal before you change lanes, which you should do anyway. The only time the pre-collision wrongly beeps is when a person in front of me is stopped to make a turn and my car thinks I am speeding towards them too fast, when I’ve judged that I can go around them or they’ll be out of my way in time. I’ve only had the brakes kick in once in a case like that.

My Outback also has blind spot detection and rear cross-traffic alert, which is very handy when backing out of parking spots. I find the blind spot detection useful on our freeways when my quick glance over the shoulder can’t tell if a car is in the next lane or farther over. Both cars have steering responsive fog lights that illuminate the corner we’re turning into. I honestly haven’t noticed that feature that much but I think the fog lights do a great job lighting up faded lines on the freeway at night. I have the V6 model of the Outback which also gives me HID lights that my aging eyes like a lot. I find them much brighter with a wider illumination pattern than the lights on my old Sienna minivan. Though not a safety feature, our cars have auto-dimming review and side mirrors which is a feature you don’t think you need but once you have it find it very nice. Our cars also have keyless access/push button start which means I can open doors just by grabbing the handle. As a woman, I find not having to dig for keys in my purse a wonderful, wonderful thing.

The Toyota minivan I traded in for the Subaru was only a 2009 and an upper trim model at that, but my husband and I were surprised how much auto technology had migrated into lower priced cars in that time. You should take a look at Subarus – they’re getting great reviews and we had to order both of ours since they are hot sellers.

Posted in Cars | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Animal Spirits on the Highway?

What Was The Buzziest Trump Media Moment Of 2015?

WP: “Trump calls for ban on Muslim immigrants to the U.S.”

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on What Was The Buzziest Trump Media Moment Of 2015?

Jonathan Allen: Face it: Trump’s the true GOP favorite now

New York Daily News:

There’s something the chattering classes along the Acela Corridor don’t want to say about Donald Trump: He’s the overwhelming favorite to win the Republican presidential nomination.

For the Republican Party’s conservative — in more ways than one — establishment, it’s as if admitting that will make it come true. So instead, they squabble over who the “real” front-runner is, whether it’s Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz. Perhaps, the parlor wisdom holds, a dark horse like Chris Christie can overtake the field at the New Hampshire turn.

For the first few months, the Trump deniers — loud on national television, insistent on Twitter and ever-present in the nation’s leading print and digital outlets — could be called wishful thinkers. With the primaries just around the corner, as many otherwise smart political analysts keep waiting, aching, for conventional order to be restored, it’s time to call them what they are: delusional…

The funniest, saddest theory out there is that Trump — who has been at this more than six months, shows no sign of tiring and clearly craves the limelight, and power — could get so bored of campaigning one day that he exits the race as abruptly as he took command of it. Yeah, and he could replace Tom Brady at quarterback in the Patriots’ first playoff game.

Instead of continuing to fool themselves, Republican pundits should school themselves in what is going on here. Like the last two Republicans who seized the White House from Democratic control, Trump paints in bold, bright colors. He exudes an almost impossible confidence. And he’s speaking directly to deep anxieties and resentments among GOP voters.

That has proven to be a potent combination among an anxious, Obama-weary electorate.

It’s understandable that Republican elites are mortified. A guy they can’t control is taking dead aim at many party orthodoxies, and profiting in the process. A few months ago, GOP insiders regarded a brokered convention as a nightmare. Now, to many, it’s more like a daydream.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Jonathan Allen: Face it: Trump’s the true GOP favorite now

America’s White Murder Rate Is About The Same As For Whites Elsewhere

National Review:

This brings to mind Matt Yglesias’s recent discussion of the white-on-white murder rate in the U.S., an effort to shed light on what some are calling the “fallacy” of talking about black-on-black crime. Yglesias warns that “white-on-white murder in America is out of control,” and to make his point he compares it to white-on-white homicide rates in a number of other countries:

This is not to say that white people are inherently prone to violence. Most whites, obviously, manage to get through life without murdering anyone. And there are many countries full of white people — Norway, Iceland, France, Denmark, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom — where white people murder each other at a much lower rate than you see here in the United States. On the other hand, although people often see criminal behavior as a symptom of poverty, the quantity of murder committed by white people specifically in the United States casts some doubt on this. Per capita GDP is considerably higher here than in France — and the white population in America is considerably richer than the national average — and yet we have more white murderers.

While one can debate what it means for a country to be “full of white people,” it is worth noting that the white share of New Zealand’s population (74 percent) is lower than that of the United States (77.7 percent), and the non-white populations of France and Britain are quite high. Moreover, non-white individuals in these countries are, like non-white individuals in the U.S., more likely to be killed than whites. It is not clear to me how Yglesias calculated the white-on-white murder rate in these societies, but I’m happy to accept that all of them have a lower white-on-white murder rate than the United States.

But if we instead compare the rate of intentional homicides of these countries to the rate for the white population of the U.S., the white U.S. does not in fact look like a dramatic outlier. (I want to stress that I could be getting something wrong here, so please let me know if I’ve gone astray and I will revise accordingly.)

According to statistics gathered by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, the 2011 intentional homicide rates per 100,000 for the countries identified by Matt are as follows: Norway (2), Iceland (1), France (1), Denmark (1), New Zealand (1), and the UK (1). The rate for the U.S. as a whole is 5. As of 2011, there were 3,172 white murder victims in the U.S., according to the FBI. The white population as a whole is 245.5 million, including whites who identify as Latinos. This yields an intentional homicide rate of 1.29, a number almost indistinguishable from those of Iceland, France, Denmark, New Zealand, and the UK and lower than the intentional homicide rate of Norway, Canada (2), Belgium (2), Israel (2), and Finland (2). In contrast, there were 2,695 black murder victims in 2011 against a 2013 black population of 41.7 million, which yields an intentional homicide rate of approximately 6.5., a rate higher than that of Kenya (6) but lower than that of Lithuania (7).

Posted in America, Crime, Whites | Comments Off on America’s White Murder Rate Is About The Same As For Whites Elsewhere

SCENES FROM WEIMERICA

PICTURE: “In Weimerica, instead of exchanging recipes and learning to cook, young women exchange dildos and learn how to perform fellatio.”

COMMENTS:

* What the Alternative Right needs to be worth more than internet bandwidth is for us to meet in groups where the men can learn to fulfill the traditional role of men and women can learn to fulfill the traditional role of women.

* So I did a reverse Google Image Search and the image comes from a (((Russian))) School for “Mastering the Art of Oral Sex”.

Now, of course, the sensible thing would be to get married. In marriage, the woman could “practice” on her husband all she wants and the man would have no problem with it. But, of course, going that route would make sense – and we don’t do things that make sense because… CURRENT YEAR.

* Oral sex is sterile and therefore a perversion, regardless of whether it is done in marriage or not.

* I don’t think we should encourage girls to suck penises, because that just amounts to a form of rejection – anything to keep the penis away from the vagina where it should go in a married sexual relationship.

* The historical enemies of European people and their heritage are doing all they can to corrupt European women by ”normalising” perversion and vice. ”They” are able to do it because of their near total control of media. Art / Culture is in the throes of death as a result.

Said Spengler in his The Decline of West: ”One day the last portrait of Rembrandt and the last bar of Mozart will have ceased to be, though possibly a coloured canvas and a sheet of notes will remain, because the last eye and the last ear accessible to their message will have gone.”

A great reset is needed perhaps. Perhaps we are asking for it.

”I am become Death, the destroyer of Worlds” (The Lord in Bhagvad Gita)

* Even the worst blow job is better than the best soufflé.

* How long before someone complains about lack of color diversity in the dildos?

How long before homos demand that they join too?

How long before dorks get together and practice with plastic vaginas?

* We are told that there is no American race, no American language, no American religion, no American normality, no American ethnicity, no American anything…

America means being ‘tolerant’, ‘inclusive’, ‘diverse’, and etc.

That being the case, no one is more American than anyone else. Since Americanism means being ‘welcoming’ and ‘inclusive’ to people all around the world, it means everyone around the world is already American.

Why? Because America feels inclusive toward them.

So, why do we need immigration? If America is all about being inclusive and diverse, then America should declare that entire world is one big America, and so, everyone is in America simply by being in the world.

If anything can be American, then it means everything is American. It would be wrong to say anything is ‘un-American’ since that would not be ‘inclusive’.

No need to come to America to become American. You are American by being you in your own country because Americanism can mean just about anything.

Why should America define ‘American’ as someone who lands on American soil and gains citizenship? Why, that is blood and soil ideology. It is ‘atavistic’.

It is better to say all the world is part of America and that everyone in every corner of the globe is American. To say that only American soil is part of America is ‘exclusive’.

America must be ‘inclusive’ of all the lands around the world. China is part of America. Russia is part of America. France is part of America. Iran is part of America.

To say ‘this is America’ and that is not America’ is a form of ‘us vs them’ mindset. It is wrong. No, ‘this is America’ and ‘that is America’. We are all Americans no matter where you were born or live.

(Interesting that some people don’t come to American but create a good imitation of America in their own nation. In contrast, some people come to America but never become part of America: Hasidim and radical Muslims.)

Posted in America, Sex | Comments Off on SCENES FROM WEIMERICA

Matt Drudge might elect Donald Trump: The GOP front-runner’s secret weapon is the conservative media icon

Salon.com: Donald Trump has already won one important primary, and that’s why he’s not going anywhere any time soon.

Every time Donald Trump says or does something that would destroy the careers of most politicians, he maintains or even gains supporters. It seems that nothing he does erodes his support. His voters are loyal, that’s for sure.

If you want to understand the Trump phenomenon and the durability of his campaign, you have to understand his voters and how they get their information. Many on the left mistakenly think that Trump supporters are “low-information voters.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Actually, it’s the opposite. They consume a lot of news and information, and almost all of it comes from their most trusted source — Matt Drudge.

Matt Drudge is all in for Trump, and he is making sure that his millions of daily readers are getting the news.

Drudge, of course, is the owner of the popular conservative news aggregator the Drudge Report, a site that records approximately 2 million unique visitors a day with about 700 million page views per month. His readers are loyal, too. A 2014 Pew Research Center study found that the Drudge Report is among the most trusted news sources among conservatives, while most mainstream media outlets register a very high level of distrust from that group.

His loyal readers don’t trust information coming from other sources, and that allows Drudge to carefully curate links to articles that help to further his pro-Trump point of view among that audience. The most pro-Trump conservative news site is Breitbart.com. Breitbart is so pro-Trump that some have charged that the Breitbart company is being paid by Trump for favorable coverage. The truth is that Breitbart’s loyalty is more to Drudge than it is to Trump.

Breitbart was founded by the late Andrew Breitbart, who was the Drudge Report’s first employee. He founded the Breitbart news site after leaving the Drudge Report, but remained personally and professionally close to Drudge. The Breitbart site established itself quickly as the go-to news source for grass-roots anti-establishment conservatives, with an assist from Drudge who regularly posted Breitbart article links on the Drudge Report. Over the years, the Drudge Report has directed millions and millions of readers to Breitbart stories…

Trump has made immigration the centerpiece of his campaign and he credits best-selling author and conservative provocateur Ann Coulter’s new book, “Adios America,” with shaping his view on that issue. Coulter and Drudge are close friends. In fact, they were seen sitting together in the audience at last week’s Republican debate on CNN. She even dedicated one of her many bestsellers to Drudge.

Posted in Donald Trump, Matt Drudge | Comments Off on Matt Drudge might elect Donald Trump: The GOP front-runner’s secret weapon is the conservative media icon