Does Nationalism Cause War?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Nationalism makes a people attractive, just as self-confidence makes people attractive.

* So nationalism causes war?

That’s funny. Ever since the Arab nationalism movement was crushed in the 60s, the Middle East seems to have been thrown into a perpetual state of war and backwards radicalism.

In fact every time a nation is destroyed or destabilized in the middle east things seem to get far worse and far more violent instead of improving. Perhaps acting in the interests of your region ethnicity, nation, etc in some official regard that is seen as legitimate by the local populace is a better idea than just letting whoever has the most guns or money take over your country.

* It’s weird to think that somewhere within the Icelandic govt or some NGO some bright spark is in a meeting and jumping up and shouting “You know what we need round here – a ton of Africans and Muslims!”

* I like how all the players are actually Icelandic in comparison with the French , German or English teams, although I am sure they have some immigrants even there. White countries are too good to pass up when there are goodies to be had.

Even Iceland will be inundated with the 3rd world masses.

There isn’t a white country around that the diversity freaks don’t want to get their claws into.

* “In 2014, the global winds are blowing in favor of conservative nationalism”

Eventually, the World WILL integrate and become one. Globalization is not a political or even economic process: it is a technological one, fostered by the massive developments in communication and transport technology, which has shrunk the World. This allows trade of goods, ideas and people on an unprecedented scale.

Like I said before, what is happening is that we are proceding to becoming a Type I civilization on the Kardashev Scale. The internet, for instance, is the beggining of a Type I telephone system.

Nationalism is rooted in tribalism, which is an atavistic instinct that many humans have. Such an instinct comes from the Paleolithic Era, when tribes of humans competed over small patches of land, which meant hunting grounds. Because humans back then couldn’t manufacture anything, which means that there wasn’t anything to trade with other tribes, and the struggle for survival was intense, tribes saw each other simply as rivals. Warfare was the natural state of Humanity back then.

But if you look at the history of the World since 10,000 B.C, it has been one of political structures getting progressively larger and more complex. The small bands of the Paleolithic Era , with no more than a few dozen people, grew into cities with thousands, these city-states joined with others and became nation-states. Now, nations are integrating and becoming a global community. The process is still in it’s infancy, and there will be many set backs, but the end result will be the end of all national borders. It might take another 100+ years, but the end result will be the same.

The reason why Globalization is inevitable is because of the enormous benefits in terms of increased prosperity , and the demands that the new technologies will put on industry, which is too great for any single ation-state to provide. Developments in industry and science will inevitably require cooperation internationally. Even the Manhattan Project, over 70 years ago, was a joint venture. It was mostly bank rolled by the U.S, but the majority of the scientists were from other countries.

The demands from industry are such that it requires intenational cooperation, and the benefits of a global market are obvious: the larger the market, the greater variability of skills and know-how on the part of producers, and the larger the scale of production and consumption, which act mutually to boost each other. American companies grew much larger than most European companies due to the larger U.S market, which allows them to produce and sell on a much larger scale than in the ones available in the tiny ountries of Europe. Globalization takes this to a much higher level by creating a global market. A larger market offers advantages not only due to the power of increased consumption power boosting producton by increasing demands, but also due to the greater options in terms of variety in labor skills and cost. For instance, many American conservatives want closed borders for trade because many American workers have lost their jobs to China. However, they don’t realize that there is a beneficial effect: by producing cheaper abroad due to cheaper labor, companies can sell their products to American consumers cheaper. This directly increases the living standards of Americans AND leaves Americans with more free cash, which they can invest to grow the economy, which creates new jobs with even higher wages for those Americans who previously lost their jobs to China. Everyone benefits when the market is larger and offers more options in terms of labor skills and cost, consumption and production. This goes back go Adam Smith and David Ricardo. But dumb conservatives don’t understand this.

The dumb conservatives that read Steve Sailer don’t understand this. They don’t understand the true nature of globalization, they don’t realize the progressive compression of the World, and they don’t understand the increased prosperity that comes from Globalization due to maximization of utility.

Sailer is right about one thing, though: tribalism, and therefore nationalist, is a very powerful instinct for many people and it will set back Globalization a lot. As Einstein once said:

“Nationalism is the cancer of Mankind.”

There will be many anti-Globalist movements. But I believe that the World becoming one “tribe” is inevitable. Such is the nature of the natural progression of technology, and the benefits of increased markets.

* Well, I can remember when foreigners coming to America were limited in number, the stress was on assimilation, and the people coming here wanted to be assimilated. Now it seems that the “fierce nationalism” inspired in people who weren’t born here is for their home countries and too many of them want to change America to be more like their home countries they are only too happy to flee.

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on Does Nationalism Cause War?

FBI Recommends No Charges Should Be Filed Against Hillary Clinton

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* FBI Director Coomey delivered a measured indictment of Hillary’s incompetence, without recommending an indictment. He actually said that in many cases this type of activity would result in sanctions or have other consequences. But that’s the real world and this is Obama World. But, on a positive note it gives her opposition plenty of ammo.

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on FBI Recommends No Charges Should Be Filed Against Hillary Clinton

Full Body Shot Of Our Attorney General

Comment:

* I saw a full body shot of AG Lynch the other day for the first time and was taken aback by how enormous she is. Like Hillary and other Democrat females she gets the flattering camera treatment (as much as such a thing can flatter them), usually showing Lynch only from the neck up.

Trigger warning:

dlxPs05l

4gY642YSiqmwii9qfhANPXwAV5I-1z1ZBA7Jyt3fsao

Posted in America | Comments Off on Full Body Shot Of Our Attorney General

Jews Vs Asians

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* We younger American Ashkenazi Jews are failing to live up to potential in the opinions of Messrs. Unz and Reed. In the future, the most gifted will probably be Asian. Regardless, even in the here and now only elite and connected Jews have the potential for national influence. In smaller Jewish community settings, politically conservative Jews get shut down almost immediately by the far more numerous liberal Jews who aren’t remotely eager to hear what the conservatives have to say. That’s why I have nothing to do with my local Jewish community. Better to be a recluse than actively hated.

* LF: Jews are not lacking for success and influence in the West. Jews probably own at least a quarter and probably more of all real estate (by value) in the US. They determine the Overton Window. They run the media and finance. They donate most of the money to the political parties.

* I think immigration is just an artifact of Emancipation. The Jews who stayed in Hungary, Germany etc did extraordinarily well for themselves too (at least until the unfortunate events of 1933-45). In all likelihood we will see a quasi-emancipation of ultra-Orthodox youth in the next couple of decades too as ultra-Ortho economic model is not sustainable long term.

* While existing wealth and power doesn’t disappear overnight except in war, etc., young Jews have largely disappeared from the ranks of National Merit Finalists, math competition winners, etc. In part this is because young (non-Orthodox) Jews have disappeared period (having never been born), but also because they are like other American kids and would rather play video games than do math problems. Edison said that genius is 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration – Asians are still willing to sweat.

* LF: Neither Fred Reed nor Run Unz know anything about Jewish life aside from what they read in the papers. When you have a group such as Ashkenazi Jews who have an average IQ around 110, they’re going to continue to dominate. The Jewish kids I meet and know are every bit as brilliant as their parents. The Mirman School in Los Angeles only accepts children with an IQ above 145. The school is at least a third Jewish. When you see billionaires and other people creating the future, it seems like at least a third of them are Jewish.

Jews are far more aggressive than asians, and are far more verbally gifted, and have more drive. In media, politics, law, academia, law, etc, Jews will retain control.

When I see an asian lawyer go up against an Ashkenazi, it’s like watching a deer attack a lion.

Average Jewish household wealth is about twice that of the next richest group — Japanese Americans.

Which group do you think will most advise the next five presidents? Asians or Jews?

* There are over one billion East Asians relative to around 15 million Jews, of which only a little more than half are Ashkenazi. The average East Asian IQ is around 105 and possibly higher in some regions with the result that there are more East Asians with IQ’s above 140 than there are Jews in the world. I also question whether we have seen all that Asians are capable of in this country since so many American Asians are recent immigrants or first-generation American b0rn and raised somewhat apart from American culture. It may be the case that the most gifted and aggressive Ashkenazi Jews retain a greater share of control in law and politics, but what about more ordinary Jews? They will have to compete harder for a pool of jobs that will be in constant decline due to automation. The Asians may actually have an advantage in the subset of technology jobs where visual/spatial intelligence is more important than verbal intelligence.

Posted in Asians, Jews | Comments Off on Jews Vs Asians

‘How does cognitive ability relate to which groups one dislikes? Unsurprising results.’

Academics: “…we test who shows intergroup bias? and find that people with relatively higher and lower levels of cognitive ability show approximately equal levels of intergroup bias, but towards different sets of groups.”

* John Rivers: “Racial differences in IQ mean society will inevitably stratify by race. This causes resentment & anger & conflict.”

CmjfzlcUIAAdP-R

“Whites have higher avg IQs than Blacks. I don’t think Whites should run all Black countries, though.”

“Similarly, East Asians and Jews have higher Avg IQs than Whites, but I don’t think they should run all White countries.”

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on ‘How does cognitive ability relate to which groups one dislikes? Unsurprising results.’

Forward: Reclaiming a Star-Spangled Progressive Patriotism in the Age of Donald Trump

Jay Michaelson writes:

It’s July 4 weekend, and we’re all watching the fireworks together: my partner and I, and a few hundred strangers. And it occurs to me: What I love about America is not what the loudest America-lovers love. In fact, I have a sense that it’s the opposite.
I love the threads of American multiculturalism, the promises that it sets forth – and can’t keep – of an identity constituted not by race or religion but by allegiance to certain ideals, among them social equality, freedom to do what you want if you’re not harming others, and the rule of law. Like all ideals, these have not yet been attained. But they measure our shortfall; they tell us where to navigate.

Jews and leftists such as Jay Michaelson love America as a leftist ideal of multiculturalism. They don’t particularly care for the actual nation.

Nations are not ideas. They are composed of a particular people and a particular tie to a particular part of the earth.

Can you imagine saying to your spouse? “I love the threads of your many identities and lovers, the promises that it sets forth – and can’t keep – of an identity constituted not by race or religion but by allegiance to certain ideals, among them social equality, freedom to do what you want if you’re not harming others, and the rule of law. Like all ideals, these have not yet been attained. But they measure our shortfall; they tell us where to navigate.”

How do you think she’d respond?

Surprisingly, Jay Michaelson does not push for the Jewish state of Israel to be an ideal of multiculturalism.

Wanting your country to be multicultural is like wanting your wife to take many lovers. Normal people expect their spouse to be monogamous and to have certain set identities such as wife, mother, and a member of a particular religion and a particular national allegiance.

The greatness of America lies in its promise of a better future, a future closer to its own ideals. We have progressed unevenly in the direction of greatness, but the overall trajectory is unmistakable. In the past lie only lesser iterations of this greatness, with promises broken to Native Americans, African Americans, Jews, women, LGBTs.

This is not a love of country based in reality. The more diverse a country gets, the more weak and divided it often becomes.

Donald Trump’s white supremacist supporters despise these groups – including Jews – because they see, correctly, how the hegemony of white protestant men has decreased as the voices of everyone else have been amplified. Where they err is in deeming this change a diminution in America’s greatness, rather than a hesitant step toward it.

Their America is a place of their own cultural primacy. But the great America is a place where there is no cultural primacy.

When the fireworks explode, I am celebrating religious liberty, which enabled my Jewish ancestors to settle here and maintain their identities – not the Christian Nation. When the kids behind me are shouting with joy, I am celebrating their diverse accents and appearances – not resenting them. When we honor those who have given their lives for this country, I honor their sacrifices and resolve never to support the needless loss of life.

Is this patriotism?

Moral psychologists point out that liberals like me tend to value norms of freedom, fairness, and equality more than norms of group identity, authority, and loyalty. That means that liberals tend not to be “patriots” when patriotism is defined as waving the flag, chanting “my country right or wrong,” or believing that America’s greatness has anything to do with its previously dominant language, ethnicity, or culture.

Comments at Forward.com:

* Short translation – As soon as we get rid of the culture that made this country great then we can really make this country great.

* You and your partner continue to support “multicultural” immigration policies that bring in annually hundreds of thousands of Jew hating, Gay Hating, Female enslaving Islams. See how that works out for you and the liberals in 25 years. Fool.

* George Orwell wrote a fine essay back in 1941, “Wells, Hitler and the World State”. There, he- among other things- describes liberals like Michaelson. It seems that not much has changed.
…………………………
All sensible men for decades past have been substantially in agreement with what Mr. Wells says; but the sensible men have no power and, in too many cases, no disposition to sacrifice themselves. Hitler is a criminal lunatic, and Hitler has an army of millions of men, aeroplanes in thousands, tanks in tens of thousands. For his sake a great nation has been willing to overwork itself for six years and then to fight for two years more, whereas for the common-sense, essentially hedonistic world-view which Mr. Wells puts forward, hardly a human creature is willing to shed a pint of blood. Before you can even talk of world reconstruction, or even of peace, you have got to eliminate Hitler, which means bringing into being a dynamic not necessarily the same as that of the Nazis, but probably quite as unacceptable to ‘enlightened’ and hedonistic people. What has kept England on its feet during the past year? In part, no doubt, some vague idea about a better future, but chiefly the atavistic emotion of patriotism, the ingrained feeling of the English-speaking peoples that they are superior to foreigners. For the last twenty years the main object of English left-wing intellectuals has been to break this feeling down, and if they had succeeded, we might be watching the S.S. men patrolling the London streets at this moment. Similarly, why are the Russians fighting like tigers against the German invasion? In part, perhaps, for some half-remembered ideal of Utopian Socialism, but chiefly in defence of Holy Russia (the ‘sacred soil of the Fatherland’, etc. etc.), which Stalin has revived in an only slightly altered from. The energy that actually shapes the world springs from emotions — racial pride, leader-worship, religious belief, love of war — which liberal intellectuals mechanically write off as anachronisms, and which they have usually destroyed so completely in themselves as to have lost all power of action.

Posted in America, Jews, Nationalism | Comments Off on Forward: Reclaiming a Star-Spangled Progressive Patriotism in the Age of Donald Trump

Ross Douthat Sanitizes Alt-Right Ideas For His New York Times Column

Richard Spencer tweets:

* For a long time, Douthat has been lifting, and sanitizing, #altright, HBD, and paleo ideas for his columns.

* Buckley didn’t capture the conservatives for neos. He created a terrible movement, which was taken over partially by neos.

* Certainly, an authentic (though naive) small-town libertarian-conservatism existed pre-Buckley.

* Also, neocons came from the Trotskyist-Marxist left, before entering the Right after Reagan.

* Interestingly, the neocons and “conservatives” had so many elective affinities: foreign policy, America = capitalism, etc.

* I have a hard time w/ idea that neocons “hijacked” conservatism, as it implies that the Buckley-ite movement was ever good.

Posted in Conservatives, Neoconservatives, Richard Spencer | Comments Off on Ross Douthat Sanitizes Alt-Right Ideas For His New York Times Column

Bernie Sanders Supporters On Race

CmicezTWYAAu2p6

Article.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on Bernie Sanders Supporters On Race

Forward: That Time a Jewess Joined the Daughters of the American Revolution

Would you expect non-Jews to feel comfortable at a Daughters of The Judaic Revolution meeting?

Forward:

A service organization founded in 1890 that educates about and preserves history related to those who fought in the American Revolution, the DAR was historically all-white. It had a reputation for racism based on such incidents as its exclusion of opera singer Marian Anderson from its concert hall in 1939.
Today, its website’s “Frequently Asked Questions” page has a section devoted to explaining that episode. The organization says it welcomes members of all races and backgrounds, on one condition — that they can trace their lineage to someone who fought for or aided the American side during the Revolutionary War. And while there are Jewish members, there aren’t many, and their relationship to the organization can be complicated due to history and demographics.
The DAR did not respond to a request for comment by the Forward.
Shuffield is a fourth generation Houstonian, who joined the DAR to honor her “ancestors and their contributions to establishing the United States.” She has some Jewish ancestry, but those people are not the ones who connect her to the DAR.
The group tended to side with those opposing immigration in the 20th century, said Jonathan Sarna, an expert in American Jewish history at Brandeis University.
“My sense is that the DAR was a somewhat nativist organization. They historically opposed immigration, including immigration of Jews, and were a force for preserving an old America,” he said. “That debate is still alive,” he added, even though the DAR is no longer involved. Indeed, presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump has repeatedly called for banning Muslim immigration to the United States and building a wall on the border with Mexico.
The organization’s past racial politics initially made Tamar Fox, a writer and editor, hesitant to join, but her reservations disappeared when she met with then-head of the DAR’s Manhattan chapter, Wilhelmina Kelly, who is African-American.
“She was really invested in getting people of color in the DAR, so I felt like they were doing good work, and I was not really worried that they were racist,” Fox told the Forward.

That the Daughters of the American Revolution was formerly all-white is not surprising as it was whites who created the American Revolution and the American nation. Jews played little role in the founding of the United States and its first 100 years of development.

The Forward says that Jews relationship to DAR can be “complicated.” Well, yeah, Jews relationship to any gentile country or institution is going to be complicated, about as complicated as it is for non-Jews to have a relationship with a Jewish state or institution.

“Anti-Semitism is as natural to Western civilization as anti-Christianity is to Jewish civilization, Islamic civilization and Japanese civilization.” (Maj. Kong)

Samuel Francis wrote:

It is all very well to point to black cotton-pickers and Chinese railroad workers, but the cotton fields and the railroads were there because white people wanted them and knew how to put them there. Almost all non-European contributors to American history either have been made by individuals and groups that have assimilated Euro-American ideas, values, and goals, or have been conceived, organized, and directed by white leaders…

Just as the Christians turned pagan temples into churches and pagan holidays into Christian holidays, multiculturalism is replacing an old culture with a new one. It is the expression of a deep-seated hatred of this culture in its religious, racial, and moral expressions…

The civilization that we as whites created in Europe and America could not have developed apart from the genetic endowments of the creating people, nor is there any reason to believe that the civilization can be successfully transmitted to a different people.

Posted in America, Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Forward: That Time a Jewess Joined the Daughters of the American Revolution

Ricky Vaughn: “Black” civil rights leaders

CmiHMW7UcAANc0u

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Ricky Vaughn: “Black” civil rights leaders