The Age: Sudanese in Melbourne Are Victims of Racial Profiling (Also, They Commit 2 Orders of Magnitude More Major Crimes)

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Some pushback comes from the Murdoch tabloid newspapers and talkback radio. But Australia doesn’t have free speech protections like the USA does. Both Murdoch newspaper columnists and talkback radio hosts have been charged and convicted under our version of ‘hate speech’ laws.

If Pauline Hanson makes a stand on bringing back free speech to Australia her One Nation party will explode in popularity, maybe even gaining the balance of power in the Senate. Then things would get interesting. There might be some hope of fixing our immigration system before it’s too late.

* When you find out the answer to this question, try to find out who thinks the flood of Somalis to the U.S. is a good idea.

* I’ve always found it odd that the left never wants to differentiate between different groups of people when advocating more immigration. I mean, what are the odds that every group of humans on this planet is a net benefit to first world societies? Perhaps the majority in Australia, the US, and Western Europe is so awful, that we can just assume anyone coming to these countries has to be an improvement? Either that, or they simply want as many non-whites as possible and don’t particularly care about what it does to the native born.

* The influx of Africans was a remarkably stupid decision by the otherwise generally sound Howard Government (1996-2007), and numbers of new African immigrants have now declined. However, the legacy of that influx is with us in the form of their vibrant offspring.

The crime stats don’t identify the race of the perp, so country of birth is the best official indicator of background that is available. Note that “youths born in Australia” (who “commit the most home invasions, car thefts and aggravated robberies”) include Australian-born Africans, some of whom are now teenaged and at the forefront of this crime wave.

The general perception in Melbourne is that, in relation to some specific types of crime (car-jackings and home invasions) most of the offenders are African. Every day there are also reports of ordinary street robberies and other crimes where the offenders are described by the victims as being “of African appearance”. This is despite Africans being less than one per cent of the population.

For us Melburnians, two orders of magnitude is very easy to believe.

* Because of black prominence in sports and music, globalism has made all nations worship blacks as ‘cool’. So, they welcome black immigrants from Africa to ‘Americanize’ their own nations. “Hey, we got blacks too, just like America.”

But blacks are bigger, stronger, and more aggressive, and they beat up the native populations and commit lots of crime. What is happening in Australia is also happening in Europe. And even though black population of Japan is small, they commit lots of crime there too. But because blacks have been ‘sacralized’, we are not supposed to criticize them or the crazy immigration policy. If you speak honestly about blacks, you are silenced as ‘racist’. Since America dominates the world, even its brand of ‘guilt complex’ defines the entire world, even places that have NO reason to feel any ‘historical guilt’ regarding blacks. White Australians, for instance, owe something to native Aborigines, not to black Africans.

Concerning blacks, there is a combination of admiration and sympathy. Because blacks are better at sports and sing loud, non-blacks admire them and try to imitate them. But because black Africa is so poor (and blacks in the New World were slaves), non-blacks feel compassion for blacks as helpless and harmless children in need of help.

Result of this ‘hope’ and naivete is disaster.

* Blacks make up over 50 percent of San Francisco’s jail population, even though Blacks make up only 6 percent of the city’s general population. So San Francisco has a similar problem as Melbourne when it comes to overwhelming majority White cities/overwhelming majority Nonblack cities that have a major Negro crime problem.

* An elderly friend of mine said that, in the early 1970s, he noticed that there really was nothing for the newspapers to write about. The country was remarkably peaceful, united, and prosperous.

He thought at the time that this was too good to be true, and that ‘somebody, somewhere’ would deliberately upset the happy equilibrium for their own reasons.

Lo and behold, in the 70s we get the beginnings of pathological altruism and open borders.

Ethnic-based crime syndicates followed soon after, and continue to plague us. As does the Labor Party’s cynical exploitation of ethnic groups for electoral advantage.

For this, and for unaffordable family homes, and for ever increasing government debt, the ‘baby boomer’ generation is increasingly detested by those like me who have come after and who have to live in the increasingly ugly world that they created from the paradise in which they spend their own childhoods.

* Here’s an interesting incident called the Cronulla beach riots.

Back in 2005, Lebanese men were beating up lifeguards and sexually harassing women at Cronulla beach. The Aussies retaliated, with over 5,000 white youths going on a rampage and beating up a bunch of Lebs.

That’s generally not something you’d see in the U.S. It seems that Australians are bit more masculine and less PC than Americans.

* I don’t control the media. Just look at the State Farm ad that shows a bigass Negro proposing to some young white girl. There are tons of that stuff.

GLOB world is schizo. It says ‘race is just a social construct’ and ‘there are no racial differences’, but it also sends the message that ‘white girl should go with black men cuz the negroes are superior in manliness’.

I wonder when this cognidis (cognitive dissonance) will blow up.

Posted in Australia, Blacks, Sudan | Comments Off on The Age: Sudanese in Melbourne Are Victims of Racial Profiling (Also, They Commit 2 Orders of Magnitude More Major Crimes)

IS HE MR. RIGHT OR MR. ALT-RIGHT?

New Yorker:

Is your special guy Mr. Right—or actually Mr. Alt-Right? Luckily, there are a few surefire warning signs.

Mr. Right: Brings you the paper in bed on Sunday mornings.
Mr. Alt-Right: Believes that your Sunday-morning paper is brought to you by a cabal of scheming Jewish élites.

Mr. Right: Doesn’t mind staying in on a Saturday night and watching TV together.
Mr. Alt-Right: Was banned from Twitter for harassing Leslie Jones.

Mr. Right: Asks how your day went and is genuinely interested in the answer.
Mr. Alt-Right: Listens to Infowars and has some genuine questions about Pizzagate.

Mr. Right: Accepts you just the way you are.
Mr. Alt-Right: Accepted Tila Tequila’s friend request.

Mr. Right: Makes you feel like the most special woman in the world.
Mr. Alt-Right: Refers to you as “snowflake.”

Mr. Right: Impresses you with his ambition and drive.
Mr. Alt-Right: Has a hard drive full of Pepe the Frog memes.

Mr. Right: Isn’t afraid to talk about your future together.
Mr. Alt-Right: Isn’t afraid to use the term “white genocide.”

Mr. Right: Is kind to your friends and makes a real effort to connect with your family.
Mr. Alt-Right: Just retweeted your dad and called him a cuck.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on IS HE MR. RIGHT OR MR. ALT-RIGHT?

Disturbing Lessons from the Chicago Beating

Dennis Prager writes:

Last week, four young blacks — two males, both 18 years old; and two females, 18 and 24 years-old — kidnapped a mentally disabled 18-year-old white boy and tortured him for 24 hours. Among other things, they kicked him, beat him, cut his scalp, made him drink from the toilet and made him kiss the floor while saying he loves black people. During the beatings, the suspects yelled out, “F— white people, boy” and “F— Donald Trump.”
The victim was found by police on Jan. 3rd.
There are five important lessons to be learned from this episode.
1. Even after largely ignoring the story in the beginning, the mainstream media have barely covered it. And when they started to, the racial element was first ignored and then downplayed. The original Associated Press report not only did not mention the racist outbursts but it also never mentioned the race of the perpetrators or the race of the victim.
Under the headline “Chicago police investigate video beating,” the AP report began: “Chicago police said Wednesday that they’re investigating a video circulating on social media that shows several people beating a man at a residence. Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said at a news conference that four suspects, two males and two females, are in custody.”
What makes the mainstream media’s reporting a moral scandal is that every honest person living in America knows that if four whites had kidnapped a black, tortured him for hours, made him say “f— Barack Obama” and “f— blacks,” and made him bow down to the floor and say, “I love white people,” the story would have been on the front page of The New York Times and every other liberal and left-wing newspaper in the country; and it would have been the lead item on all news broadcasts and the subject of virtually every editorial and left-wing column. It would have been portrayed as more proof that America is racist, and that hate has taken over America since the election of Donald Trump.

For example, since the election of President-elect Trump, The New York Times has run a weekly column titled “This Week in Hate.” In the Jan. 5 column, there was no mention of the crime. The lead story of the column involved a black transgender man who was attacked on the subway.
On Jan. 6, the Times finally had a feature article on the attack, but it had no mention of the central role that race, the hatred of whites and the hatred of Trump played in the incident. Titled “Beating of Disabled Teenager Highlights a Crime That Often Goes Unpunished,” it portrayed the crime as a hate crime against the disabled.
It began saying: “The appalling video seized the nation’s attention this week: A group of young people kidnapped, bound, beat, slashed, gagged, humiliated and threatened to kill a teenager with mental disabilities over nearly three days, and laughed about it as they carried out their acts.”
And the left talks about right-wing “fake news.”
2. The Chicago police also downplayed the most obvious aspect of the case.
The police spokesman, Commander Kevin Duffin, said at a news conference: “Kids make stupid decisions — I shouldn’t call them kids; they are legally adults, but they’re young adults, and they make stupid decisions.”
And Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said the act could not be labeled a hate crime: “I think some of it is just stupidity, people just ranting about something that they think might make a headline. I don’t think that at this point we have anything concrete to really point us in that direction, but we’ll keep investigating.”
After the Chicago Police Department was attacked nationally for such remarks, it eventually concluded that it was indeed a hate crime.
3. Aside from the media’s reaction, imagine what black America’s reaction would have been had the races been reversed. The NAACP, the Black Lives Matter movement, the Congressional Black Caucus, the white left — led by the irresponsible Southern Poverty Law Center — and the mainstream media would have led an outburst of national hysteria about Trump-unleashed hate. And there would have been riots in Chicago and many other major American cities.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Disturbing Lessons from the Chicago Beating

Angela Nagle: What the Alt-right is really all about

From the Irish Times:

Currently the subject of a major Twitter storm, Nick Pell’s article for The Irish Times’ website “The Alt-right: everything you need to know” omitted the main thing you need to know about the alt right – that its central concern is race.
Richard Spencer, a movement leader named in the article, who popularised the term Alt-right, couldn’t be clearer or more explicit about his goal, which is to create a white racial consciousness in America. Some of the more ambitious aims discussed exhaustively in Alt-right circles include the creation of a white ethno-state in America and later a pan-national white European consciousness, uniting North America, Russia and Europe in a bloc or Empire.
Spencer is in the strict dictionary definition of the term, a racist. He claims “race is something between a breed and an actual species” and believes non-white Americans should leave in a “peaceful ethnic cleansing”. He believes the Alt-right will infiltrate mainstream American culture and politics, starting with deporting undocumented immigrants under Trump. Spencer’s Alt-right takes influence from the French New Right who were often called “Gramscians of the Right” applying the theories of Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci, arguing that political goals would best be achieved through changing the culture and media from which formal politics would follow. And so far, it seems to be working.
The strictest definition of the Alt-right includes other overtly racial thinkers like Jared Taylor who calls himself a “race realist”, Steve Sailer who writes about “human biodiversity” – a pretty transparent euphemism – and Nick Land who explores the idea of the “Dark Enlightenment”. All of these are to varying degrees preoccupied with racial IQ, the Bell Curve, Western civilisational decline due to increased racial impurity, cultural decadence, cultural Marxism and Islamification…

While Alt-right leaders like Spencer are deadly serious and irony-free, it would be absurd to suggest that there has suddenly been a mass explosion of popular and sincerely-held white separatism in the US – a fevered liberal fantasy now mockingly associated with the expression “literally Hitler”. There are many in the Pepe-meme-sharing, Alt-right online world who probably aren’t that political but like the transgression and subcultural subversiveness.
No matter how familiar you are with the Alt-right, and I’ve watched them closely for many years, “explaining” the Alt-right’ to a general audience will always make you sound like an overwhelmed grandparent trying to figure out how to work the internet, in part because of their slippery use of irony. Stylistically the Alt-right is like the music subcultures of past decades, with its hip elitism that rolls its eyes at normies who don’t understand its conventions and argot – even though they are of course designed to be opaque to outsiders so as to resist easy interpretation.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on Angela Nagle: What the Alt-right is really all about

Left: Donald Trump Is Not the Enemy We Prepared for

Andre Reszitnyk writes for Truth-Out:

Trump is the organic expression of a sinister faction of right-wing thinkers that have up until now been restricted to the dark corners of the internet: the neo-Nazis, white supremacists, extreme religious traditionalists, anti-Semites, anarcho-capitalists and hardcore libertarians that together make up what white nationalist Richard Spencer describes as the “alt-right.” This host of regressive political communities also includes the so-called Men’s Rights Movement, the group responsible for instigating the Gamergate cyber attacks upon women in the video game industry. Jared Taylor, the head of the white nationalist New Century Foundation and one of the chief “intellectuals” of the self-described alt-right, has said that the president-elect, “instinctively, clumsily stumbled upon some of the policies that we’ve been promoting for a long time.” These are the people for whom Trump was not a protest candidate but instead a champion, the first high-profile figure to openly espouse their extreme cause. This movement embodies a violent identity politics for straight white men that rejects the very principle that all people on Earth deserve equal protection and dignity.

The white supremacists and other right-wing activists who describe themselves as the alt-right are united less by coherent shared policy positions and more by a number of strong feelings — mostly angry, hateful feelings directed toward the media, government institutions, universities and the so-called culture of political correctness. Members of this group describe the efforts of left-leaning academics, politicians, media outlets and celebrities to call out racism, sexism and homophobia when they see it as tyrannical developments that have stripped white men of their “rightful” power. Claiming that feminist, anti-racist and anti-homophobic political movements represent a turn away from universalism, and that efforts to criticize offensive speech amount to censorship, this group rejects both mainstream Democrat and Republican parties. Some members of the alt-right have hijacked the language of feminism in order to describe their movement as an intersectionalism of the right, which blends a wide spectrum of prejudices. The self-described alt-right gives a home to all who reject the idea that the government should provide for its citizens and that all people are equal. Trump’s vocal supporters — KKK leader David Duke, anti-Semitic media chairman Steve Bannon, anti-feminist and Islamophobic journalist Milo Yiannopoulos, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, white supremacist website The Daily Stormer, and an army of anonymous internet trolls posting racist Trump memes on 4chan and 8chan — comprise a veritable “who’s who” of the alt-right.

In order to identify the hub around which the varied spokes of this movement turn, it is necessary to examine one of the more intellectually “rigorous” factions of the movement: neoreaction. The principle voices of neoreaction are Curtis Yarvin, who goes by the pen name Mencius Moldbug, along with former University of Warwick professor and Deleuzian philosopher Nick Land. The central theme of neoreactionary doctrine, which is predominantly expressed via long, torturously written blog posts, is hardline opposition to what they call “the Cathedral,” the imagined alliance of institutional politics, academia, mass media and culture. The three major subsections of Breitbart News — the alt-right’s chief internet gateway — “Big Hollywood,” “Big Government” and “Big Journalism,” clearly echo these neoreactionary pillars.

What neoreactionaries find so abhorrent about “the Cathedral” is its promotion of things that we generally take for granted as the preconditions for political activism: namely, a belief in natural equality, human rights, social justice, egalitarianism and democracy. Land urges his followers to “stagger back in imagination before 2008 … remain in reverse until the Great Society/Civil Rights era … that is before backing out of the calamitous 20th century.” He calls for the creation of a “Dark Enlightenment,” which embraces the technologies and scientific achievements of the past 200 years, but rejects the progressive, universalist mode of politics that emerged after the French Revolution.

The neoreactionary movement is not just trying to slow down or partially reverse the advances made over the past decades by women, people of color and the LGBT community. Rather, it seeks to install a society in which equality as such is regarded as evil. While the left battled those who were unwilling to include everyone in the universal human community, a cabal of misanthropes was rejecting the very notion of a global humanity. Many of us underestimated the strength of the fringe, which sought to divide the world back into tribes.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on Left: Donald Trump Is Not the Enemy We Prepared for