Dallas Cowboys Happy Over Election

I’m a right-wing Republican who has only voted Republican (though I did vote for the Labor party in Australia in 1989), but when I look at the election through the lens suggested by TV writer/producer Rob Long — that Americans are casting for their leading man over the next four years — I’d much rather look at Barack Obama than John McCain.

McCain looks like he has one foot in the grave. He looks feeble. His mental reactions seem both slow and bizarre.

Barack is smooth. He’s pleasant to watch on TV. He wears well. He seems far more presidential than any candidate for president since Ronald Reagan.

I’m happy today that there wasn’t any mass rioting last night. I feared it would be like the Philadelphia Phillies winning the World Series.

I walked home last night from Torah class with renewed awe of the black man. I felt old and fragile and had a sickening certainty that I’d say something inappropriate on my blog about the election.

By the way, white missy Sarah Palin sure is pretty, even in defeat. It was with great sadness last night that I removed my Sarah Palin lipstick yarmulke and put it away for the final time.

I’m back in black.

As for the Cowboys:

Chris Canty:

"It’s just historic. You will hear this said a lot over the next several weeks it really means something when African-American parents can tell there children you can be anything you want to be. You can look at Obama as the symbol of that. The struggles that African Americans have had in this country from earning citizenship, being allowed to read, basic rights, being allowed to vote. It’s really amazing its almost surreal. You know it’s huge and you know it hasn’t all the way and set in. "

Greg Ellis:

"Congratulations Obama. I think it was a good choice. It was good for our country it’s a good accomplishment for blacks in a whole and not from a racial point of view."

Terrell Owens:

"Very emotional and historical moment. There was a change and hopefully that can trickle on down to our season."

Posted in Dallas, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Dallas Cowboys Happy Over Election

Orthodoxy’s Shidduch Crisis

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach writes in the Jerusalem Post:

The religious Jewish dating scene is severely broken. In the secular world men and women date by meeting each other at co-ed institutions like school and university or at events like parties and weekend getaways. They begin to date and the relationship unfolds gradually and organically as they get to know each other better over time.

This is not to say that all things are hunky-dory. There are major problems in this model, like the fact that pretty girls and overtly successful guys are going to get noticed over those with quieter and subtler virtues. Likewise, sex has come to play such a prominent role in secular dating that couples get to know each other physically rather than emotionally, creating distance and a lack of real intimacy in relationships.

But in the religious world where dating is so often dependent on third parties making introductions, young men and women are at the mercy of others to meet a potential spouse. Those third-parties are often professional matchmakers or friends who set them up.

The flaw in this model is that first, it disempowers men and women from meeting directly and creates instead a dependency on those who are not principals in the dating. Second, professional matchmakers often treat their occupations as an impersonal job and take no real interest in their clients. Third, it involves so much work. Since a matchmaker is making an introduction to someone you’ve never met, you have to make the effort of finding out more information about the person in question. Fourth, none of this is terribly romantic. It all seems highly unnatural, even tiring.

Very often these introductions are done arbitrarily and almost randomly. You’re a girl, he’s a guy. You have a pulse, he has a pulse. So a mutual friend thinks, "Wow, what a great match!" What often happens, therefore, in the religious dating world is that it becomes a game of trial and error. Since people are introducing you almost randomly and without a lot of personal information to justify the introduction, you decide to go out anyway on the off chance that it might work. And even if it doesn’t, at least it will teach you about what you’re not looking for. BUT THE more you date, the more desensitized you become. Men and women slowly lose their mystery. You’re overexposed to something that’s supposed to be just a little outside your reach, thereby inviting you to cross over to the other side.

After a while, you’ve dated so many people that not only do they become a blur, but you’re reduced to using the most superficial criteria to distinguish them. "Oh good, this guy is taller than the last few guys I dated." "Oh no, she has very thin eyebrows. It looks like she made them with an eyeliner."

Dr. Michael Salomon responds:

Writing in his column on the subject of "How to fix Orthodox dating" (November 4), Rabbi Shmuley Boteach addresses the problems he has found with the process. It is refreshing to see someone with his level of visibility willing to raise important issues and even point out that the system is "severely broken." In fact, I have raised these issues in two of my recent books, most prominently in The Shidduch Crisis: Causes and Cures (2008). Perhaps that is why I have received so many e-mails requesting I react.

In the first few paragraphs of Boteach’s piece, he writes that the current approach to shidduch dating "disempowers men and women from meeting directly and creates a dependency on those who are not principals in the dating… Second, professional matchmakers often treat their occupation as an impersonal job and take no real interest in their clients. Very often these introductions are done arbitrarily and almost randomly."

I’ve stated these positions myself, and have been attacked for it.

Unfortunately, the evidence simply does not support much of the rest of his position.

Among the first issues he addresses is how dating progresses in the secular world, describing it as a process that "unfolds gradually and organically." This is absolutely accurate. But Boteach states that the model favors the pretty girls and handsome guys. Actually, all the research has shown over the years that while looks are an important part of the initial attraction, physical appearance runs a distant second to more intrinsic issues such as personality similarity and life goals. A reverberating circuit is set off when people hold an attraction of personality to each other that is not impacted by looks.

Further, the suggestion that sex creates "distance and a lack of intimacy in relationships in secular couples" is just plain wrong on at least two levels. By making this statement Boteach is claiming that secular couples date expressly for sex and, like rabbits, jump from partner to partner. It is difficult to know for sure about premarital sex rates in the secular and Orthodox worlds; people tend not to respond earnestly to surveys of this nature. But in my professional position I would have to say that this statement is simply not a fair one. Second, sex rates are in no way related to a lack of intimacy. Perhaps the opposite is more likely.

It is similarly untrue that the "more you date, the more desensitized you become." On the contrary, decision theory – the psychological study of how people arrive at their choices – would argue just the reverse. You need options to choose what is best for you. In fact, his statement that because you date too much, you are "reduced to using the most superficial criteria to distinguish" your dates, illustrates what is wrong with Orthodox dating. The lists of criteria – colored tablecloths, what type of hat or shirt color – are so superficial they do nothing to enhance the selection process.

The Orthodox system of dating restricts socialization in real world settings. Recent proclamations against double dating ("inherently wrong") or mixed seating at weddings – probably the most opportune ways to meet and socialize – only serve to make the situation worse.

I have suggested alternative techniques to allow Orthodox daters to meet and get to know if they are right for one another. But setting up a "professionally run matchmaking organization," as Boteach suggests, would be precisely the wrong solution. If you want people to find one another, you have to allow them – even teach them how – to be more independent and act as adults, not have go-betweens always making decisions for them.

Shmuley, I fully support your desire to first acknowledge the problem and then find a means to address it. After all, the rates of divorce in the Orthodox world are climbing rapidly, as are rates of domestic violence. But, if you truly want to address these issues, please do some more research. I am here to help you.

The writer, a fellow of the American Psychological Association, is the director of the Adult Developmental Center in Hewlett, New York. His recent books include, The Shidduch Crisis: Causes and Cures, and Every Pot Has a Cover: A Proven Guide to Finding, Keeping and Enhancing the Ideal Relationship.

Posted in Dating, Sex | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Orthodoxy’s Shidduch Crisis

Rescuing Chained Women

I remember discussing agunot eleven years ago at Aish HaTorah with Rabbi Aryeh Markman (in 2007 he described me as a "Torah weirdo" in the Jewish Journal) and he said it was just an excuse for people to bash Orthodox Judaism.

That’s the way it goes in much of Orthodox life (or any tight knit community that feels persecuted) — any criticism by outsiders is dismissed as coming from a bad place.

From the Jerusalem Post:

Rabbis and religious MKs are split on whether or not pro-feminist legislation aimed at aiding agunot is in accordance with Orthodox Jewish values.

Chief Sephardi Rabbi Shlomo Amar was adamantly opposed to the legislation, as were Shas and United Torah Judaism MKs. Even the more moderate National Religious Party and National Union MKs either opposed the legislation or were absent from voting.

The outstanding exception was NRP Chairman Zevulun Orlev, who was involved in drafting the amendment to the Financial Relations Law and voted in favor.

Several modern Orthodox rabbis also supported the law, including Rabbi Shlomo Riskin of Efrat and Rabbi Yuval Cherlow of the Petah Tikva Hesder Yeshiva.

The amendment gives divorce courts the power, 12 months after the divorce process is initiated, to split up assets accrued during a marriage. The financial aspect of the divorce settlement can now be finalized even before the giving of a get [divorce writ].

Prior to the amendment, the giving of the get was tied to the overall divorce agreement, which includes financial matters and child custody issues. Often, the giving of the get, which must be done with the agreement of both husband and wife, was used by the financially stronger side – usually the man – as a bargaining chip to obtain more assets or child custody rights.

Posted in Agunot | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Rescuing Chained Women

Blogs, Rabbis & The Power Of Information

"Rabbis are the rock stars of Jewish life," says Jewish Journal Editor Rob Eshman.

At the top of the Jewish social circle, the best rabbis get access to the best information. People feel it a privilege to share hot scoops with their rabbi, all in the name of what’s best for the community.

Rabbis have a hechsher to share the information as they see fit, usually doling it out to their rabbi friends and most important congregants. This is not lashon hara, this is talking shop and acting in the best interests of the community.

If I were to retail the same information, I’d be accused of speaking lashon hara.

Before blogs, many important would be kept quiet.

Now that blogs are here, information is shared more democratically. One does not have to be powerful to get the scoop nor to share the scoop with everyone. One can just tune in to a good blog.

Hence, the better the information blogs have, the less power rabbis have. They no longer control information flow and they no longer control their own image.

I’ve just finished rereading parts of my memoir from 1997-1998. I can hardly breathe. Each paragraph is like a punch in the gut. I was living so much on the edge and now it is a decade later and I’m still on the ledge. I’ve been given a second chance. Making it is so close yet failure is just a step away. One wrong move and I plunge. A wrong move in the opposite direction and I sacrifice all my good work for pleasure of getting along. Must stay strong and balanced between my commitment to Orthodox Judaism and my commitment to blogging.

Posted in Abuse, Blogging, Rabbis | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Blogs, Rabbis & The Power Of Information

I Chat With Marc Gafni About Barack Obama

Marc Gafni and I discuss:

Posted in Politics | Comments Off on I Chat With Marc Gafni About Barack Obama

Oliver Stone’s New Movie ‘W’

Marc Gafni and I discuss:

Posted in Hollywood | Tagged , | Comments Off on Oliver Stone’s New Movie ‘W’

Oliver Stone’s New Movie ‘W’ III

Marc Gafni and I discuss:

Posted in Hollywood | Tagged , | Comments Off on Oliver Stone’s New Movie ‘W’ III

Oliver Stone’s New Movie ‘W’ II

Marc Gafni and I discuss:

Posted in Hollywood | Tagged , | Comments Off on Oliver Stone’s New Movie ‘W’ II

Get Ready For More Legal Hijinx

I loved the New York Times’s banner headline today about Obama’s victory: "Racial barrier falls…"

What racial barrier? There was no racial barrier to a black or a Jew becoming president. There hasn’t been one for at least 30 years.

Joe emails:

The law is clear. Gay marriage is about as valid as a kosher certification (hechsher) on a big mac. The fact that the hechsher was written before a law was made saying big macs are not kosher does not mean it is valid and the pre-law big mac is kosher. So too with gay marriage – and the idea that government cannot pass laws retroactively or impair contracts has never applied to civil matters and the contract that is marriage. However, the various pro-gay lobbies and legal defense funds, as well as the anti-anti-homosexual judiciary and media will clamor for some savings for those gays who married. As to carrying out voter intent, which clearly states that marriage is restricted to a man and a woman, well, democracy is great when obama wins, but not so great when the gays lose. Plus, the constitutional amendment does not go into effect until the vote is certified. I am certain that now is the time to be a florist, a bandleader, or a jack russell terrier breeder as more gays rush to get married to beat the clock.

A total farce on their part, and it will be supported by total nonsense by the elite class. I wonder what the Orthodox rabbis will say. There is a concept in the talmud called "bereirah" which permits decisions taken now to take effect retroactively. Perhaps someone can review the concepts in the tractate involving divorce (gittin) and expound on why prop 8 is retroactive by its clear language.

In the past few elections, the Republicans had actually been improving their performance in LA County:
 

DemDukakisClintonClintonGoreKerry
Dem vote1,372,3521,446,5291,430,6291,710,5051,907,736
Dem %51.8952.5459.3463.4763.10
GOPBushBushDoleBushBush
GOP vote1,239,716799,607746,544871,9301,076,225
GOP %46.8829.0430.9632.3535.60

 
Bush cracked one – third of the vote in 2004, the best since his father in 1992.  There is no reason the republicans cannot do better than one-third in LA county.
 
Well, in 2008, they screwed the pooch.  It was the worst percentage performance in the modern era. 
 

BARACK OBAMADEM 1,845,72669.33
JOHN MCCAINREP 766,16428.78
 
One bizzare note is that the total vote for 2008 was lower than 2004.  This is probably due to the calling of the election, essentially at 4-5 our time when obama got 200 electoral votes.  In any event, mccain really sucked and the republican party better figure this out. 

Posted in Homosexuality | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Get Ready For More Legal Hijinx

Who Is ‘CLUE’ And What Is Their Agenda?

In the last issue of the Jewish Journal, I saw a two page ad taken out by a group called CLUE — Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice.

The ad lambasted Windsor Healthcare — owned and operated by two Orthodox Jews.

The essence of the ad is that Windsor workers need "a free and fair election agreement that protects the right of caregivers to choose a union and seek a voice at work without employer intimidation."

The ad also claims Windsor gives substandard care, which is the opposite of their long-running reputation (a class-action lawsuit on this account was thrown out of court in April for lack of evidence).

The ad says there have been "58 substantiated patient complaints on issues ranging from short staffing to dire hazards."

As far as I know, there are no nursing home chains without a similar or higher level of complaints.

When I scan the signatures on the ad, I see all the clergy are left-wing. No Orthodox Jews have signed the ad.

The ad praises the "high standards [shown by] Marnier and the Jewish Home for the Aged…"

Is there any evidence that the quality of care at Marnier and the Jewish Home for the Aged is higher than at Windsor? Or are these homes praised for an alleged higher quality of care simply because they are unionized?

I google CLUE and find they are similarly active against Wallmart.

Here is how CLUE presents themselves: "It all began in 1996, when religious leaders joined the effort to pass a living wage law mandating businesses with Los Angeles city contracts to provide adequate wages and health benefits. After the legislation passed, CLUE was formed with the purpose of organizing the religious community to support low-wage workers in their struggles for a living wage, health benefits, respect and a voice in the corporate and political decisions which affect them. CLUE partners with activist unions and community organizations to increase workers’ capacity to impact their employers, to attain worker-friendly public policies and to pressure commercial/industrial developers to agree to a community benefits package in exchange for permits and subsidies."

The case for unionizing Windsor workers is made on the website DoesWindsorCare.org.

Posted in Health | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Who Is ‘CLUE’ And What Is Their Agenda?