Heshy Fried Needs A New Car So He Can Get Married

Heshy Fried blogs: “My car almost died. It overheated and we had to stand around picking blackberries on the side of a dirt road before I could get it started again. I need a new one and I’m asking you – the loyal fan who gets free entertainment day in and out — to help me get a new one. Nothing is too little, nothing is too much – from $5 to $5000. Contrary to popular belief I don’t make a living from this blog. I work full time and I get paid very little for what I do. I live paycheck to paycheck and while I have about $1000 saved up, that’s not the $4000 I need to get a decent car that will last me another 6 years.”

Abijah comments: “Aren’t you seeking someone who would find picking blackberries a good time?”

Posted in Heshy Fried | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Heshy Fried Needs A New Car So He Can Get Married

Qualifications For A Good Judge

In a 1996 lecture on Exodus 17, Dennis Prager says: What isn’t listed? Even hinted at for what a judge in Israel ought to be?

What’s missing is loving and compassionate. Nothing about that is mentioned.

The Torah has words for that. It’s not like I’m using modern words. God is constantly described as a God of enormous compassion.

Being compassionate and loving in judgment undermines being a good judge.

If I am compassionate to a black student [through affirmative action] then I am unjust to a non-black student.

Compassion subverts justice, but not when done personally.

I’d rather be known when I die, Dennis was very compassionate, than Dennis was very just, but society won’t survive if its justices are known as very compassionate.

My favorite statement from the New Testament is that truth will set you free. It does. It also makes you lonely.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Qualifications For A Good Judge

How Are You Supposed To Refer To Black In Hebrew & Yiddish?

I thought the Hebrew word “cushi” meant African. So a “cushi mamzer“, a common slang term in Israel, means “black bastard.”

Now I learn cushi means nigger.

I thought the Yiddish word shvartze simply meant black but now I learn it is pejorative.

So what is a Jew to do? How are you to say black in Hebrew and Yiddish?

Dave Deutsch emails:

“Kushim” is definitely pejorative, but to translate it as “nigger” is inflammatory and inappropriate. “Nigger” has a whole history to it, and carries a lot of baggage that “kushi” doesn’t. I don’t know enough to know if there are other derogatory terms for blacks in Israeli Hebrew–but I’m presuming that the range is far smaller in Hebrew than in American English. “Kushi” may be the worst pejorative for blacks in Israeli Hebrew, but it also may be the only pejorative term for blacks in Israeli Hebrew. At that point, you might as well have said he made reference to “jigs” or “spades” or “darkies.”

It’s an interesting question, all in all. Is there a relativity in racism? If an Israeli makes a negative comment about blacks, is it different, given the absence of the history we have, than if an American makes it? Is an anti-Jewish comment different coming from a Laotian than from German? Certainly, Israel has it’s racial issues and history, but it isn’t ours. It may be argued that, when it comes to blacks, Israelis don’t have a word for “nigger,” because they don’t have a concept of blacks so venomous as to produce it. I presume that the Israeli vocabulary is a lot richer when it comes to Arabs, but “Kushi” is probably a bit more benign. I once read about an Ethiopian immigrant complaining to a police officer that he was called a “Kushi,’ and the officer responding that he should relax–it’s like calling a redhead “gingy” or a Jew from soouthern Poland a “galitzianer.” I’d say that’s a bit optimistic, but it’s somewhere between that and “nigger.” “Nigger,” as it is currently used by whites, is a pretty self-conscious choice, that demonstrates a certain amount of bile (unless of course, you’re simply trying to show how “anti-pc” you are); “kushi” I would say shows derision, but not necessarily animus or hatred.

I just like the fact that he [Rabbi Dov Lior] refers to it as “boogie woogie.” I have an image of him getting a hold of a recording of “Minnie the Moocher” when he was a teenager and going off on a musical bender, missing mincha, an event which so traumatized him that he swore he would never listen to the siren song of “boogie woogie” again.

Sam posts: Haaretz might also want to define the word ‘shvartzer’ as “a derogatory term for black people”, but “shvartze” doesn’t mean “nigger”, it means simply ‘black’. One can also call blacks ‘shechorim’ in Hebrew; the degree of derision is not in the word itself, but in the level of derision imparted ONTO THE WORD by the speaker.

A.E. Anderson posts: There seem to be people of two minds on contemporary use of “כושי’ (kushi): in very contemporary usage, the word is used pejoratively, and it is used in its traditional, neutral fashion as a reference to African people of dark skin colour who hail from the biblical land of Kush or are descended from the son of Noah named Kush.

It doesn’t equate to, or rise the pejorative level of, “nigger,” which itself takes on different shadings when used in the American, compared with the British, context. The word couldn’t mean the same in Israeli Hebrew simply because Israel hasn’t hundreds of years of history dealing with the colour line and its problems.

Even in contemporary usage, “kushim” has varying shades of nuance: in pre-Ethiopic Aliyah times (i.e., 20-30 years ago), it was pretty much equivalent to “Shachorim” (blacks), which itself has become pejoratively tinged. Non-Hebrew speakers, speaking English, Yiddish, Yinglish or Yeshivish, may resort to the term. For some, it is clearly used as stand-in for “nigger,” while others continue to say and hear the word in its classical sense. You almost have to look to the inflection to divine the intent.

There is also the inherent problem that any word used to label a hated, disliked or lampooned group will become over time a racist insult: coloured, negros, Affirmative Action/ Equal Opportunity hirees, and, yes, kushim.

My inclination would be to let the user of the word live with the actual phrase they used, letting the chips fall where they may. I still think there are many alive who cling to the classical, non-pejorative use of “kushi” and mean no harm. After all, the word comes from the bible, and God would presumably not use bad words to describe his creations.

TRANSLAT0R POSTS: As a translator of both Hebrew and Yiddish I’d like to weigh in here.

First of all the word Schvartz is the only way to say black in Yiddish. There is no other word.

A native Yiddish speaker would describe anything black as “schvartze.”

Such as this exchange:

Velecher hoise is dayntz? (Which house is yours?)

“De Schvartze”

Velecher is dayn car? (Which is your car?)

“De Schvartze”

Velecher mench is er? (Which guy is he?)

“De Schvartze”

It’s no more an insult to the person than it is to the car or the house. It’s just the color black for heaven’s sake.

Tell me any other way to describe black in Yiddish? There is none. People use euphemisms to refer to black people in Yiddish only because people spread that Schvartze was derogatory, but none of those are considered “proper” Yiddish.

Streimel posts: Now “shvartze” was a perfectly good word to use until the shvartzes started to riot in Newark and other places full of Yidden so now it means something worse. I agree with this rabbi in Hebron. A yeshiva bachur I know began to listen to the music of the colored, then he got involved with drugs, and he became involved with heroin, stole from pishkas, stopped davening, ate pork, and finally, went to mixed dances with shiksas. From China no less! Chinese women are stealing Jewish men and so Jewish women cry, this is a fact, and it all begins with this jungle music.

Posted in Blacks | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How Are You Supposed To Refer To Black In Hebrew & Yiddish?

The Redemption Of Natan Slifkin?

Rabbi Slifkin blogs: Beginning nearly six years ago, I was the target of a campaign which caused incredible hardship for my family and myself. Today, several years later, Baruch Hashem I am fine. And where are the people who engineered this campaign and who attacked me? One rabbi, who initiated the campaign, has gone to prison for many years. Another rabbi, who was involved in rallying support for the ban and who emailed me at the time to tell me that everyone is appalled at my “nefarious” behavior, had his career and reputation destroyed when it emerged that he was involved in disgusting abuses of power involving women. The rabbi who called me from Bnei Brak to deliver the ultimatum that I must retract my books or “face scandal and humiliation,” has had to flee Bnei Brak and go into hiding as a result of his involvement with a financial scandal. A Rosh Yeshivah in Bnei Brak who was also involved in engineering the campaign has had some of his talmidim renounce him in disgust as a result of his involvement with the same financial scandal. And now a rabbi who viciously attacked me in two shiurim and a public letter, who claimed to be motivated by concern for rabbinic authority, is being publicly condemned, with calls for his employers to disassociate from him, as a result of audio recordings of him insulting a distinguished rabbinic authority and equating Modern Orthodoxy with Conservative Judaism.

Posted in R. Natan Slifkin | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Redemption Of Natan Slifkin?

Wanna Save The World?

In a 1996 lecture on Exodus 17, Dennis Prager says: If you are compelled to save the world, perhaps you shouldn’t have children because such as children are generally cheated of having a father.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Comments Off on Wanna Save The World?

What A Great Place For A Mosque

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on What A Great Place For A Mosque

The Torah’s View Of Non-Jews

In a 1996 lecture on Exodus 17, Dennis Prager says: The Torah’s view of non-Jews is absolutely positive. Would that later Jewish life have as positive a view of non-Jews.

I just read… a certain university in the U.S. will have a department of Jewish Studies headed by a non-Jew. I think that is the greatest possible news. I revel in the thought that non-Jews would be so interested in Jewish history, Jewish thought, Jewish religion, that they would want to take Jewish studies and teach it and become the head of Jewish Studies.

I am mystified at the provincialism that exists in this instance among Jewish academics… Do you only want your own group to be interested in your own group? Even on selfish grounds it’s preposterous, forget on moral grounds.

Jews were the first nation in the world you could convert to and remain among the only. You can convert to any religion but it is difficult to convert to full membership in a people. America is the other.

America and the Jews are the unique peoples in history. It didn’t matter what you were born.

The notion that all the goyim are out to get us is contrary to the Torah. Some are and some are not. Some are Amalekites and some are Midianites.

Aug. 16, 1996:

NEW YORK (JTA) — A non-Jewish professor’s charges that bigotry forced him to resign as director of the Queens College Jewish studies program have triggered a national firestorm about the proper qualifications for heading an ethnic studies program.

Queens College Russian and Yiddish literature Professor Thomas Bird, 58, who is Catholic, resigned last month amid a nationwide furor over his appointment.

The controversy erupted when a Queens College colleague, Samuel Heilman, chairman of the sociology department, said in a New York Jewish Week column that Bird was unqualified for the job.

Bird, a Yiddish scholar and longtime activist on behalf of Soviet Jews, has been with the Jewish studies program staff since it started nearly 25 years ago. It now serves about 500 students a semester.

Heilman said that because Bird was not Jewish, did not know Hebrew and had not published articles in mainstream Jewish studies, he was not qualified to direct the Jewish studies program, one of the largest in the nation.

In response, Bird charged that Heilman’s criticism was gratuitous and a personal attack on his record. He charged Heilman with “an orchestrated campaign to render it impossible for me to carry out the director’s duties.”

Bird accused his detractors of “primitive religious bigotry” in causing him to resign just two weeks after his appointment was announced.

“It is impossible not to conclude that the attempt to trash my academic record and standing in the community through insinuation and omission is anything other than a fig leaf for objections to my being a gentile,” Bird said.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Torah’s View Of Non-Jews

Time Publishers Announce Plan For Magazine Aimed At Adults


TIME Announces New Version Of Magazine Aimed At Adults

Posted in Satire | Comments Off on Time Publishers Announce Plan For Magazine Aimed At Adults

Only Two Things Are Holy In Themselves — God and the Sabbath

For everything else, contexts determines the holiness. For instance, with food, you can eat kosher food like an animal in an inappropriate place and the consumption of such food is not holy.

Sex can be holy within marriage. Sex outside of marriage is inherently unholy from a Torah view.

But two things are always holy no matter what the context — God and the Sabbath.

I’m learning this in Dennis Prager’s (1997?) lecture on Exodus 16. “My faith in God can not depend on how things go for me.”

Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Only Two Things Are Holy In Themselves — God and the Sabbath

I Can’t Wait To See The New Facebook Movie

Sharon Waxman nails it:

It seems to me that Facebook has forgotten the most basic rule of public relations and marketing: any publicity is good publicity, of course. The movie will only draw more attention to the site. It will cement its place in American popular culture.

That is a good thing. Like in previous cases where Zuckerberg has encountered pressure and criticism, he has reacted with a lack of maturity and sophistication. His protests sound like whining. He is taking this all personally — and with the size of the company he now runs, he cannot afford to whine.

I watched his public meltdown at the AllThingsD conference in June, and my sense at that time was that he is too young to be running a company this large and this important — founder or no.

His response to a big Hollywood movie is so far not convincing me otherwise.

Posted in Facebook | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on I Can’t Wait To See The New Facebook Movie