For The Re-Election Of The President, You Can Thank The People Who Came Here Illegally

Over the past 30 years, the US allowed millions of people who came here illegally to become citizens (President Reagan signed this amnesty in 1986). They’re now voting for more de facto amnesty for people who came here illegally and the type of corrupt government that these people fled from, they’re now voting into power in this country. The United States had a great run for a century but it is now in decline.

Posted in Barack Obama, Politics | Comments Off on For The Re-Election Of The President, You Can Thank The People Who Came Here Illegally

Will They Put Us In Camps?

An Orthodox Jewish friend says: “If Obama is re-elected, we’ll be put in concentration camps.” Ridiculous, but typically bitter Jewish overstatement. You’ll see the same thing in the Torah. “At least in Egypt we had meat. You take us out into the desert to kill us?”

The first time I had a responsible position in (a Conservative) synagogue (1994), I was asked to man the door to the sanctuary so people didn’t walk in while the rabbi was talking. I misunderstood and tried to stop people from walking out while the rabbi was speaking. And then I tried to stop this angry lesbian from walking in during the rabbi’s talk. So the shul had a board meeting and my name came up and I was relieved of my position. The rabbi said later I didn’t have to be such a Nazi. Give me a little power and I abuse it.

Posted in Jews, Personal | Comments Off on Will They Put Us In Camps?

The First Time I Met A Jewish Woman

In May of 1993, I went to my first conversion class at Sacramento’s Orthodox shul Knesset Israel. Because I hadn’t called ahead and interviewed with the rabbi, he promptly asked me to leave.

My friend Michael then took me to this tiny kosher food stamp operated by a single Persian woman. We started chatting her up. We said we wanted to get married. She asked for copies of our tax returns.

Posted in Jews, Personal | Comments Off on The First Time I Met A Jewish Woman

The Nazis At Shul

Why do the baalie teushuva Nazis at shul think it is their divine task to shush everyone, including pious Jews such as myself who were immersed in yeshiva when these guys were knee deep in pig?

Now these guys are all eager to instruct their betters, letting them know when to say certain prayers and when to make certain additions and the like.

Posted in Synagogue | Comments Off on The Nazis At Shul

You Don’t Have To Take This Too Seriously

When I take on worthy endeavors, such as religion or work or self-improvement, I often get this voice in my head that says, “You don’t have to take this too seriously.”

I think I first developed this as a kid. I never liked doing anything I wasn’t into. So when I had subjects at school I disliked, I just told myself, “You don’t have to take this seriously.”

When I realized at about age eight that the things I wanted most — success in this world — were of little consequence to my religion — I think I started saying to myself about the Seventh-Day Adventism I was raised in, “You don’t have to take this too seriously.”

Converting to Judaism was a shock. It’s hard to convert from a non-ritualistic religion to a ritualistic one. So as the rituals started piling up and I wasn’t into them, I’d tell myself at times, “You don’t have to take this too seriously.” Mind you, on plenty of occasions I said to myself, “You need to change your slovenly ways. You need to take this seriously.”

I entered psycho-therapy in 1998. I went every week, religiously. I read the books recommended to me. My life lurched from crisis to crisis over the next decade. At times with regard to therapy, I said to myself, “You don’t have to take this too seriously.”

With my last therapist in 2011, I said to him, “I often think that I just fine-tuned things, I could be great.” He recommended, however, that I seek major change.

I took up Alexander Technique in 2008. On few occasions did I say to myself, “You don’t have to take this too seriously.”

I’ve long found it hard to put much attention into my work if I wasn’t into it. I’ve never done well at anything I wasn’t passionate about.

I love irony and sarcasm but those who are building the greatest accomplishments tend to be deadly serious. The biggest winners I know aren’t ironic.

Sarcasm and irony tend to be markers of those who are detached. They’re not going anywhere in life and they know it.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on You Don’t Have To Take This Too Seriously

What makes New York the greatest city?

Why do New Yorkers keep repeating this publicly? On what objective basis is this true? What’s the insecurity underlying such a proclamation? People who say weird, unnecessary and untrue things are coming from a broken place. If New Yorkers were sure about this, there’d be no need to say anything. Angelenos never talk about LA being the greatest city. To do so would be uncool. It would be unLA to talk that way.

New Yorker Chaim Amalek says: “Partly it is to justify the expense of living here, that’s why. Reflected glory, etc. More substantively, LA has Hollywood and that’s it. No Wall Street, no publishing industry, no news media headquarters, few if any Fortune 500 corporate headquarters, no UN, no multibillionaire mayor, no Times Square, and most importantly, no great yeshivas in its environs. Without a great yeshiva, LA is just that place where Hollywood people live.”

When New Yorkers move to LA, they love to criticize LA, its drivers, its fake manners, its lack of a center, etc. I suspect that when Los Angelenos move to New York or anywhere, they’re much less likely to complain about their new city’s shortcomings. One thing I love about LA is that its residents don’t have a chip on their shoulder about other cities. They don’t hate San Francisco or New York or Dallas… We don’t have a football team and almost nobody cares because we have so much else going on.

LA is like the prettiest girl in the class. All the other girls cut her down out of jealousy and all the guys hate her because she won’t date them.

Los Angelenos put less energy into criticizing other cities than any group I’ve known.

A ton of people I meet who’ve moved to LA can’t find anything to compliment the city for aside from the weather. What’s up with that? It must be a reflection of an unhappy psyche. Well-adjusted people aren’t like that. They don’t nurse resentments.

I mainly lived in Northern California from 1977 to 1993 and people just had this big chip on their shoulder about LA.

I come from Australia. I asked a friend recently about his impressions of the land down under. He said astutely that Australians are the most insecure people he’s met. They’re obsessed with “100% Australian made” and other such nonsense. I told him it’s a cultural cringe.

Los Angelenos have no such cringe.

By contrast, people in Philadelphia are obsessed with hating New Yorker and other more influential cities. That’s why Philadelphia fans are so nasty. They’re insecure about their city and how it doesn’t stack up with New York and Washington D.C. for power and influence.

Posted in Chaim Amalek, Los Angeles, New York | Comments Off on What makes New York the greatest city?

The Price Of Writing Honestly

Rael emails: Hi Luke, next part of the interview if you are so interested.

1) Luke why do you like to write? What motivates you? Do you write for you as a sort of an intellectual diary, or do you write for the
readers out there? Do you have an “agenda” or do you just write from
the heart.

LF: I write out of an internal compulsion. I suspect that if I got psychologically healthy and learned to connect normally with others, I’d have much less drive to write.

When I write well (and I measure this by whether or not I like to read what I wrote), I feel like I’m doing what I was put on earth to do.

When I have an agenda, it’s clear in my writing. When I write from the heart, that’s clear too.

Rael: 2) You write very frankly and openly, often going into very personal details. How does that make you feel, and is there anything you regret having written?

LF: To write frankly, I have to put out of my head how people will react. Then, when I come back to people, I often feel embarrassed by what I’ve written.

I write because of the distance I feel from others, and by writing as I do, I increase that distance. There are many things I regret having published on my blog. Over the past couple of years, I’ve taken down many things that were gross.

3) What is the number one issue you would want to fix in the Jewish world?

LF: Any cause that I espouse will just bring disrepute to that cause, so I probably shouldn’t say anything. I have so many emotional addictions (all at root stem from an intimacy disorder) that my thinking and my will are corrupt and should not to be trusted.

4) What are your goals for the year ahead?

LF: I’d like to write well, to put on a one-man play about how 12-step work helped me with my emotional addictions, to make money and friends, and to find a Jewish woman to marry.

5) Came across an interesting quote online: “Avraham was 99 at his
circumcision, initiating a 3,700 year old covenant. No matter your
age, you can still make a lasting impression!”
Luke what is your contribution to mankind, how would you like to be remembered?

LF: I want to skip this.

I sometimes get asked to speak in Jewish life. Usually the organizers want inspiration. They want me to inspire people to take Judaism more seriously. I don’t feel comfortable doing that. I just feel comfortable with sharing like I do in 12-step meetings — here’s what I’ve done, here’s what I felt like, and here’s what helped me. It might help you too.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on The Price Of Writing Honestly

A Guide To California’s Propositions

Benny, an Orthodox Jew, emails his list: I have been requested to provide a list on how I am voting on the Props and why….so here it is:

A) Rule of thumb: I vote NO on propositions unless there’s a good reason
B) If it harms criminals, I vote YES (that’s a good reason).
C) Any prop that is supported/opposed by criminals means that I vote the other way. I never want to agree with criminals.

30: NO
Analysis: 52 – 55% of our State budget is spent on public school K-12. Those of us sending our kids to private schools are paying for this. The overwhelming majority of public school attendees are not paying taxes at all. So this is yet another tax increase on those who obtain no benefit from the tax.

31: NO
Analysis: Just another gibberish, waste of time, unnecessary prop. No one cares about this one at all.

32: YES
Analysis: Prohibits unions from making political donations. You know how much money unions gave to defeat this??? 90 million dollars. That’s an amazing number. Unions are set up to ensure appropriate treatment by employers. They are taking union dues, and using it to push in politicians who have only union interests at heart and not societies. It is a short term mentality, that is backfiring. The opponents to this appeal to the lowest common denominator by telling you that “Big Oil” will still get to make donations. I see a massive difference between a corporation and a employees union.

33: YES
Analysis: Allows insurance companies to charge those previously uninsured more money. Yes, that makes sense to me. If you have a car, you should be insured. If you aren’t, you’re an idiot.

34: NO
Analysis: This is asking yes or no on the death penalty. The death penalty in specific circumstance is a very appropriate punishment. There are some creatures in our society who forfeited their right to exist based on their own actions. Opponents of the death penalty cite cost as a reason for a yes vote – that isn’t appropriate. We should reform the sentence so that it is administered more cost-efficiently, but it should not be abolished. (You know what else costs a ton of money? Public schools. Should we abolish that because of cost, or should it be reformed?)

35: YES
Analysis: Human trafficking is bad. A byproduct of a yes vote is that it will greatly increase sentences for child pornography.

36: NO
Analysis: 3-strikes law is the greatest criminal law statute enacted in CA. It is a fundamentally misunderstood statute that takes a beating from uninformed people. Simply put, NO ONE CAN GO TO PRISON FOR LIFE FOR SIMPLY STEALING A LOAF OF BREAD. Petty theft is a misdemeanor, only felonies can be a third-strike. In order to be eligible for 3-strikes, a criminal must commit 2 prior violent offenses (penal code says “Serious” or “Violent” – and they have specific definitions….all are crimes of physical violence, in the simple meaning of the term). After committing the 2 prior offenses, the criminal has to pick up a third FELONY. Regardless of this law, prosecutors can choose to not “third-strike” someone AND judges have discretion to “strike a strike” and not impose a 3-strike sentence. I.e., the 3-strikes are carefully imposed.

37: NO
Analysis: Unnecessary regulation for putting labels on food that it isn’t genetically engineered. A) there is no proof that genetically engineered food has caused any damage; B) this law results in increased taxes (to regulate it), increased lawsuits by dirt bag attorneys seeking a quick buck. There are other methods…i.e., kashrus industry is very successful at getting labels put on food. Outside regulation and voluntary opt-in will be beneficial to those who seek such products and will not cost taxpayers money.

38: NO
Analysis: More taxes to fund education = NO

39: NO
Analysis: More taxes = NO

40: NO
Analysis: They wanna redistrict again. Didn’t we just do this??

Posted in California | Comments Off on A Guide To California’s Propositions

How Much Money Do Gas Stations Make On Gasoline?

A friend of mine owns a gas station. He says he makes two cents a gallon and that is the industry norm. He makes money selling nuts and soda and ice cream.

Gas prices in California are down about 70 cents over the past two weeks to around $4 a gallon.

Posted in California | Comments Off on How Much Money Do Gas Stations Make On Gasoline?

The KinderGarden of Eden: How The Modern Liberal Thinks (And Why He’s Convinced That Ignorance is Bliss)

In 2007, conservative humorist Evan Sayet gave a deadly serious speech to the Heritage Foundation that became one of the five most talked about political speeches of the past decade.

I had a chance to talk to Evan via email about his new book — The KinderGarden of Eden: How The Modern Liberal Thinks (And Why He’s Convinced That Ignorance is Bliss) — and in reply to my questions, he wrote:

I wrote the book because I was blessed with an understanding of how the Modern Liberal thinks that was not being articulated by others as well and as clearly as I was able to do it. The vast majority of books that address Modern Liberalism seek to chronicle the wrongs of the Left, but they don’t address how the Modern Liberal comes to support these wrongful positions. How does he think he’s making a better world by siding with all that is evil, failed and wrong and against all that is good, right and successful. My book explains the ideology and somebody had to write it.

The process was terribly disjointed, with a fair number of starts and stops. Much of the thinking was developed, tested and honed in speeches to Republican and conservative organizations. For the longest time I had this giant “block of ice” — the overall concept — and what I had to do was chisel out the swan.

I went back and forth as to “tone” all the way to the end. Should I make the book funny? Ultimately I decided that, because some of the major claims I make are so hard to accept vicersally — come on, how can these people really be morally and intellectually retarded at the level of the five-year-old child??? — that I decided to argue the case scientifically rather than to risk confusion by being humorous.

I began the book by listing the Four Laws of my Unified Field Theory of Liberalism and then three corollaries. The first of those corollaries is that “The Modern Liberal may have personal standards but he must deny them and militate against them and those who employ them in the public arena.” The truth is that the vast majority of successful Modern Liberals LIVE a conservative life but will not support and publicly promote the values and the practices that led to their success. Dennis Prager has more than once said “How much better the world would be if only they (the Modern Liberals) would preach what they practice.”

The KinderGarden of Eden: How The Modern Liberal Thinks (And Why He’s Convinced That Ignorance is Bliss) is being compared to the works of Thomas Sowell, Allan Bloom, Ayn Rand and Mark Levin’s “Liberty and Tyranny.” It’s available for download at my website, evansayet.com, and in print via either my website or Amazon.com.

Posted in Evan Sayet | Comments Off on The KinderGarden of Eden: How The Modern Liberal Thinks (And Why He’s Convinced That Ignorance is Bliss)