I’ve had a credit card with USAA since 1994. They are the best. I remember when I used to make credit card payments by mail and some of the banks would drag their heels processing payment so they could charge a late fee. USAA never did any tricks like that. Every contact I have had with them has been positive.
I just called them up on a $25 late fee I got when I changed my checking account three weeks in advance of my next automatic payment and as a courtesy, they waived the fee.
I also have to say that all of my Bank of America customer service interactions over the past few years have been positive. I’ve banked with BofA since coming to America in 1977.
Posted inArticles|Comments Off on USAA Is The Best Bank In America
It’s a soap opera. The infighting among board members led to R. Weil being forced out last spring and then getting back in this fall. It led to R. Burg being elevated last spring and then forced out this fall.
It’s a power struggle. R. Berg bet on a new head of board to replace Simcha Katz, Katz found out and fired him, Weil was on his way out to be replaced by Berg. Now the people who liked Berg and hate Katz are trying to get revenge.
Weil was on his way out, and Berg was taking his place. Berg quit his position in NCSY, and then bet on the wrong guy, he seems to have thought that he could stack the board with his guys and make his job easier. He failed.
Weil had been a disappointment, therefore Glasser was brought in to do the “heavy lifting”. When the board take-over failed, Katz destroyed Berg (he had been an early supporter) attacked him in front of the board for things he told berg to do…of course there was no paper trail – Berg trusted Katz and then tried to get rid of him, Katz was basically like – “I created you – I can destroy you”
others standing on the side know something real bad happened and now want Katz’s head.
Berg who quit NCSY for the promise of Weil’s job was fired (can say he quit) took a job which will require him to raise real money.
Weil still has a truncated job, and has to have his eyes open – maybe he thinks Richard Joel will be forced out of YU.
So to answer your question the starting point was Weil’s lack of performance in raising money and in being a team-player, and he probably got some people upset with him.
The battle now appears to be between supporters of R. Steven Weil and supporters of Paul Glasser who essentially took over Weil’s CEO (executive vice-president) position. For years there has been a low grade war between the rabbis in the Kashrut division and the rest of the OU staff.
What difference will all of this have to Modern Orthodoxy in America? None. The OU is a club for a few rich guys.
Mark* emails (and the following has been edited):
Luke,
Funny to see Paul Glasser’s name mentioned among the cast of characters in the OU soap opera. He worked at Beth Jacob in the 1980s as its Executive Vice President. Cantor was the position he had originally applied for. He instituted BJ’s current practice of having prayer leaders in the auxiliary services do so as volunteers; they had formerly been paid honorary sums that recognized their professionalism.
A few years ago, toward the end of Weil’s tenure at BJ, Glasser visited and led services.
Once R. Weil fulfills his relocation/residency requirements, he may move back to SoCal, where he might become the rabbi of Young Israel of North Beverly Hills. He’s not a fan of cantorial music, so it will be interesting to see how it goes when he and Netanel Baram are re-united in the same city where, for a short time, they last served as co-clergy.
Failed Messiah had some interesting coverage a few days back. He linked it to a statement that the OU had posted, applauding the conviction of a Chasidic child molester, but then the OU pulled the statement from its site. FM seems to think there’s a feud between the people who stand on principle (and wanted the statement to remain posted) and those who don’t want to upset the wider Orthodox political applecart. Interesting take, but I’m not sure if it’s accurate.
The leadership of the world’s largest provider of kosher certification, the Orthodox Union, is in disarray.
Sources on Monday confirmed massive infighting among the O.U. leadership and a slew of managerial changes as members of the board of directors vie for control.
The situation at the O.U. was first reported last week in The New York Jewish Week.
Harvey Blitz, the chairman of the O.U.’s kashrut commission, reportedly is challenging Simcha Katz for the presidency of the group. Meanwhile, the group’s executive vice president, Rabbi Steven Weil, has retained his title and an office at headquarters despite being stripped of any executive responsibility.
Rabbi Steven Burg, the former head of the O.U.’s youth group, NCSY, had been made temporary caretaker of the group last year but recently departed.
Michael Cohen, the former New York state political director hired less than a year ago, also has left abruptly.
With its logo appearing on more than 500,000 consumer products, the O.U. is the largest kosher supervision agency in the world. The total revenue from the operation — a closely guarded institutional secret — is used to fund an array of religious services and communal operations, including a public affairs office in Washington, a publishing house and a congregational umbrella group for synagogues.
Jack* emails:
Luke,
You are again projecting your own very limited perspective, and adulation for unworthy mediocre suburban LA Rabbis, with reality.
No one except for you has suggested there is a battle between Weil’s supporters and others at the OU. Weil has no supporters at all… But you are still stuck in an emotional time void of seeking his approval to enter Beth Jacob, and actually admiring his “inside information on Israeli war strategies” that he used to pronounce from the pulpit…
Weill keeps his office without responsibility because of a clause in his contract as part of the relocation back east that must be fulfilled until he can convince some congregation to hire him…
Sorry to strip away the gloss for you, but it is important for your readership to comprehend how limited your understanding of the orthodox community remains to this day, and how significantly you permit your own emotional experiences with present and former suburban LA pulpit Rabbis to skew your perspective of how they are actually perceived within the greater community. You know just enough to reach wildly wrong conclusions and analyses.
The Young Israel movement has been shaken to its core in scandal this past year, and will never recover.
Yeshiva U is first being shaken, and soon other cases will come out that will make these oversights seem a Sunday stroll in the park — and this is after they lost $100 million of endowment by simply ignoring all rules that were on the books.
The RCA is embroiled in litigation and investigations of judicial impropriety that a million dollar marketing budget cannot mask.
The Federation (not only in LA, but nationally)is a well documented disaster of fundraising machine for the sale of fundraising, mired in corruption and jaw dropping magnitudes of waste. Today, significant numbers of Jews simply won’t deal with the Federations at all, despite multi-million dollars marketing campaigns to maintain the power structure.
In short, modern orthodoxy in the US is hitting the limits of fundamentally corrupt and anachronistic, that went the way of most near monopolies in both Jewish history and recent archdiocese, for lack of a better term, history in the United States.
As Twain notes, it is easy to fool the masses, but very difficult for them to come to terms with the fact that they have been played for such fools. Eventually, however, the realization occurs that these organizations are too corrupt to the core for repair or remedy, despite the best efforts of those in power or profit, and that the community’s interests are better served through the creation of entirely new organizations and the creative destruction of the anachronistic and corrupt long standing organizations. This was the purpose of Touro Lander, YCT and many other recently created entities.
Society forgets that 50-75 years ago, YU, REITS, the RCA and RCC, the OU, Beth Jacob, the Federation, Young Israel and countless other “eternal pillars of modern orthodoxy” were newly established precisely as responses to the irreparable corruption and anachronism of the organizations that existed at the time — including some now considered simply quaint, such as an official Chief Rabbi of New York City, which at the time was the Great Battle in Judaism, difficult as that might be to imagine today.
In Israel this process is much further along, both in the demise of “eternal” political parties and the demise of the Chief Rabbinate itself.
In Israel, when Weil’s dear friend and colleague Motti Elon was stripped of the right to hold a pulpit, he openly asked what the Ethics Committee expected him to do now to support his family (like Weil, the minor detail of vast family wealth notwithstanding). Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein, this great Rosh Yeshiva of Gush Etzion and son in law of The Rav, a member of the Committee, publicly replied that perhaps he should consider going into construction.
Judaism, and modern orthodoxy in particular, has reached another point in time when anachronistic and corrupt major Jewish organizations can no longer be repaired and need be replaced with new ones with entirely new leadership, painful a transition as that might prove to be.
I notice a handful of Asian women in Los Angeles wearing hospital masks. I suppose they want to avoid the flu. In at least one case, she’s wearing it to avoid contaminating others. It’s such a thoughtful gesture.
I love my experience of Asian-American culture. These Asians tend to be on time, to pay their bills, to be law abiding, educated, devoted to family, understated, courteous, wise and cuddly. They don’t panhandle and they don’t blast gangster rap.
* Zero Dark Thirty and Lincoln were not nearly as good as I hoped. Lincoln in particular was a drag. I don’t know why Spielberg thought this particular story about lobbying would be cinematic. A woman in shul told me she has tried a dozen times to get through LINCOLN and failed.
I think Moonrise Kingdom is my favorite movie of 2012. I also loved Flight with Denzel Washington.
* I was all prepared for a graphic torture scene at the beginning of Zero Dark Thirty. The scene turned out to be like a walk in the park when compared with the torture wreaked by this man’s jihadist cause.
* This old Persian guy patted my stomach in shul and told me to get to the gym. I’m 180 well-chiseled pounds on a 6′ frame. Others in shul call me, “The Waste” and “The Great Under-Achiever.”
* What do men want? Young clean flesh. Not graduate degrees and lots of confidence and other manly traits.
* It’s the attitude, stupid. Younger women are easier to deal with, they don’t feel so entitled. Did you know Osama had a hot hot young wife when he died? Less than half his age. If he deserved that (a hot young wife) then so do I.
I notice that many, perhaps most, women my age or older hate it when I date hot young women, but I don’t notice men hating high-status men who have their pick. Don’t hate the playa, hate the game!
* A few weeks ago, Dennis Prager did a couple of hours of his radio show on this topic: What’s better for a kid when his parents hate each other? To have them divorce in a civil manner, or to have them live together in a civil manner out of obligation, both yearning for the other parent to die so they can be set free from the bonds of marriage? Most callers to Dennis said they would rather their parents divorced.
* It is a mitzvah to get married. That means that preparing for a date and all the costs of a date are also a mitzvah. Beautify the mitzvah! Take her out somewhere nice! Until this insight, I was taking my dates to shul for kiddish.
Posted inAsians|Comments Off on Asians On The Street With Hospital Masks Gangnam Style
In 1981, 22 year old Michael Diller, the son of Stanley and Dorothy Diller, was murdered by a family friend. The Dillers and the murderer were Orthodox Jews.
The murder was the nail in the coffin for Stanley and Dorothy Diller’s marriage, which formally ended in 1985 and resulted in expensive litigation.
The murderer went to prison where he was recently came up again for parole, but the Diller family and the District Attorney successfully aruged against that option.
A Jewish prisoner in San Quentin is demanding that California reclassify him from “white” to “non-white,” giving a curious twist to America’s long-shifting attitudes toward Jewish ethnicity and race.
The petitioner is Stephen Liebb, 47, an Orthodox Jew and one-time lawyer, who is serving 25 years to life for first-degree murder.
…He was raised in an Orthodox family, educated in New York yeshivas, then graduated from Syracuse University with highest honor.
He moved to Los Angeles to study at UCLA Law School, graduating in 1980, according to UCLA records. He passed the bar examination, started to practice law and then the unthinkable happened.
“I had on ongoing dispute with a friend,” Liebb said. “I was confused, I had an emotional outburst, I stabbed him once and he died. That happened 22 years ago and I have been in different prisons since. I have been turned down for parole three times.”
Petitioner became embroiled in a series of business disputes with
the family and friends of the victim, Michael Diller. He assaulted
Joe Gold, a friend of the family, hitting him fifteen times on the
head with a bat. He also hit Michael Diller’s brother, Arthur.
Later, in a telephone call with the Diller brothers’ mother, he
threatened the Diller family. The next morning, Arthur confronted
Petitioner. They fought, and Petitioner hit Arthur with a pipe,
breaking his nose and causing injuries requiring stitches.
Subsequently, Petitioner confronted Michael Diller, who was in a
car with a female friend. Petitioner grabbed the car door, pulled
it open before Michael’s friend could close it, jumped on the
friend’s lap and hit her and Michael. Michael accelerated the car
and Petitioner grabbed the wheel, causing the car to crash into a
building. After the crash, Michael jumped out of the driver’s side
and ran towards a park, with Petitioner chasing him. Michael ran
to the park office and dove through a half-open window. Petitioner
lay on the window sill of the park office, facing Michael.
Petitioner had a knife, and Michael grabbed it, cutting his hand.
Petitioner pulled the knife away from Michael, stabbed him in the
chest and then ran. Michael died shortly thereafter. The deputy
medical examiner testified that Michael died of loss of blood and a
stab wound through his lung and heart. The knife, a three-andthree-quarter-inch blade, had been given a hard thrust and twisted
inside Michael’s chest.
“Basically, it was someone who had been a friend of mine, the brother of my girlfriend. I allowed a series of conflicts to escalate that could have been resolved without any type of violence. I stabbed an innocent person to death.”
“I have taken full responsibility, and for many years it was very hard to live with the weight of what I have done. At first I was in denial. A lot of people here are – it’s easy to stay in denial when you’re in prison, but I thought about what I had done. When I started to get in touch with the harm and grief I caused, it was very, very hard to live with, especially the first years. I felt so guilty I couldn’t see how I could ever be good again.”
Posted inStanley Diller|Comments Off on Michael Diller’s Killer Refused Parole
In sixth grade, the most beautiful girl in my class at Pacific Union College Elementary School, Cindy Anderson, dropped a note on my desk asking me, “Would you like to go with me?” Here was what I wanted most. I yearned to connect with Cindy. After I read her note, I was flooded by emotion. I felt high. I didn’t know how to respond. So I viciously teased Cindy for the rest of the school year. Why did I turn down what I wanted most? I have to figure this out.
I began fifth grade in January 1977 at Avondale College Primary School. I knew we were moving to California in May. I was excited.
My other excitement in fifth grade came from girls paying attention to me for the first time. Ever since I entered school in second grade, I’d had an interest in girls. It turned into a lump in my throat and a longing in my heart in third grade. I liked this solid freckled redhead Debbie Hick, she just seemed so capable, but I did nothing about it.
In fifth grade, this chubby girl had the hots for me. I responded the only way I knew how, by teasing her, by leaving tacks on her seat, and when that was not enough, by kicking her.
I remember getting tacks and putting them pointy side up on her seat and wincing when she sat on them and she yelped in pain as the tacks drew blood. Other kids saw what I did. I suspect the chubby girl knew.
Then there was the time she got close up and I started kicking her and she said to me through her tears, “One day you’ll know what it is like to love someone who kicks you.”
I think she cursed me.
Normally, I had to bike home at lunch time to eat with my step-mother, but there was a time at school that year when I was free and sitting on the grass with other kids and this girl, perhaps Wendy Leach, started flirting with me. I was embarrassed and awkward and probably hostile. The sun was shining and she was talking about kissing me and I think I just got out of there.
In May, my parents and I moved to Pacific Union College (PUC) in the Napa Valley. I began sixth grade in September of 1977. My father walked me to school that first day and told me to work on my listening skills and to not argue with people, advice that he would repeat over the next 15 years.
In those first heady weeks of school, people didn’t know I was a loser. My place in the social pecking was not set. I was interesting.
At Avondale, my place in the social pecking order varied from the bottom (where I started out in second grade when I still peed myself) to the middle (when I left in fifth grade). I usually become more popular with time in a place.
One’s social rank is obvious. It’s not some abstract label. It’s a reflection of whether or not people want to be around you. If everyone excludes you, you might as well die. Social ostracism and humiliation equal death. Status is life.
I noticed some big changes when I came to PUC. At private school in Australia, none of the girls were allowed to wear make-up. At PUC, the girls wore make-up, notably Lip Smacker, a fruity gloss that made their lips shine and smell like strawberries or watermelon or vanilla. Strawberry was my favorite flavor for milkshakes and ice cream. I just wanted to get in on those shiny fruity American lips and lick the strawberries.
In Australia, the other kids had body odor if they smelt at all. In America, people were perfumed (except for my dad who thought it was unhealthy).
In Australia, there was abundant corporal punishment. I got hit by my fifth grade teacher, Mrs. Mazzaferri, more than any other kid in the class but one (Willy). I was proud of my defiance but hated getting hit. I imagined, however, that it gave me prestige. I saw myself as a great rebel, a chip off the old block.
In Australia, kids had to wear school uniforms. In America, you could wear what you wanted.
In Australia, spontaneous emotion was discouraged. If you waxed enthusiastic, you were accused of “raving like a Yank.” In America, you could express your feelings and wouldn’t necessarily get mocked for it.
In Australia, it seemed that only the mentally ill got counseling. In America, it seemed like regular folks were in therapy and that affected the way people spoke. I got the label of “insecure.” Nobody used that kind of psychological language at Avondale.
The other big difference between my schools was that in Australia, the girls rarely made a move on the boys. In America, the girls were sometimes bold.
At my PUC school, we had dividers between our desks. One day, I watched Cindy Anderson, the most beautiful girl in the class, a tall classic brunette with a Jane Seymore like beauty (or perhaps she was more Kate Jackson or Jaclyn Smith) with long hair and a great smile and a sense of humor and sweet social skills, approach my desk and drop a note on it. No one had ever dropped a note on my desk before. Even if the note had been blank, it would’ve felt like a major social advance for me.
I opened it up with a pounding heart and read, “Would you like to go with me?”
I was flooded with emotion. This was the greatest thing that had ever happened to me. I was high. I was sailing above my problems because the most beautiful girl in the class wanted me.
I was immobilized by the intensity of my longing for Cindy. I was frightened by the prospect of attaining what I wanted most.
I wasn’t close enough to anyone to talk about what had just happened to me.
I wanted to say “Yes!!! I want to go with you”, but I feared that was a step over the precipice into an unknown world of human connection.
I have to figure out why I didn’t say yes to Cindy Anderson because this same reticence plagues me to this day when I can receive what I want most.
I think that the main reason that I didn’t say yes to Cindy was that I had no model for love. Due to my father’s constant controversies, my mother’s fatal cancer and my step-mother’s depression, my home was a cold sick place. My older brother and sister left as soon as they could. Nobody liked being home, not me and not my siblings and not my parents. We all wanted to be somewhere else. We were all happiest when we were away because none of us came from a good home and all of us felt best off when we were distracted. My dad had his work, his Christian evangelism. That always came number one for him. My step-mother was out of her mind half the time because of hormonal imbalances. I had no healthy role models for how to relate to others. My dad was a flame-thrower of the Christian gospel, spraying it far and wide like napalm and keeping himself at the center of church controversy and us on the edge of the precipice of ostracism. My step-mom tried to hold things together.
My dad was a martyr for Christ, an automaton for Jesus, a machine for the gospel, a robot for the divine. He appeared to have no needs because he felt embraced by God’s love. My step-mom, on the other hand, seemed like endless need. Women were frightening to me because of this. I feared that they were all need.
I tried to imitate my dad. I would deny need. I would discipline myself to do great things. I would be another Protestant martyr, a man for all seasons.
When I was offered ice cream on a hot day, I’d say no, even though ice cream was what I wanted more than anything. I preferred to put other people in pain rather than to please myself. I was more invested in hurting others than taking care of myself. I thought about suicide because it seemed like the most hurtful thing I could do. I was always plotting vengeance at my enemies. My dad had enemies because he was a preacher of the Gospel. I had enemies because I was equally righteous.
I learned how to make others miserable by inflicting misery on myself. I modeled my father’s martyrdom for the cause.
The central story of my Protestant upbringing was that God came to earth to martyr himself and that we should do likewise. Growing up, I didn’t learn much about enjoying life. “I don’t give a cracker for this world,” my father would say. He didn’t bother with hobbies and pleasures. He was all mission. Everybody he met was just fodder for Christ.
I had no model for saying yes to what I wanted. I had no road map to human connection. I had no example to emulate. I only knew sickness. I only knew how to antagonize others so that they would keep their distance from me and I’d be less vulnerable. I’d be less exposed. I wouldn’t be found out as an emotional cripple.
So what was I scared of with Cindy? I was flooded. When a car is flooded, it will not start. When I am flooded, I can not start. What frightened me? That if I said yes to Cindy and became close with her, all the misery and rage I had locked up inside of me would pour out in an frightening way. I was frightened of my need. I wanted to be strong like dad but I was weak like mom.
Crying was a big sin in my home. It meant you weren’t right with God. If you knew God loved you, why would you cry? On the handful of occasions that my father spanked me, he said, “I will hit you twice as long if you cry.” So I learned not to cry and I learned not to admit negative emotions. Who needed the reprimand?
If I said yes to Cindy, I feared what was out there. I feared that my floodgates would open and that I would cry like a baby and I’d lose control and I’d get hit twice as hard for twice as long. I feared I’d become this aching gaping grand canyon of need.
In the moment I read the note, I set sail on a river of emotion and it went on and on and on as I numbly went about my day.
I kept the note. It was a token of an ordinary world I had yet to find.
So what did I say to Cindy? Nothing directly. I just teased her unmercifully for the rest of the school year and I teased the boys who hung out with her.
Then, near the end of the year, imagining that my teasing had been witty and entertaining, I dropped a note on Cindy’s desk asking her to go with me. She replied, “No!!!!!”
She left my school after sixth grade and I have no idea what happened to her.
I kept acting out of hostility for much of my life, but never again did the most beautiful girl in the class ask me to go with her. Cinema Paradiso is my story. “When a Sicilian boy is mesmerized by the movies at his local theater, he befriends a projectionist who tells him to leave home and pursue his dreams.”
During the summers before seventh and eighth grade, I spent many an afternoon in the PUC pool playing keepaway games with the girls. We each paired up with someone. My girl was Jeanie, this amiable chubby blonde. We’d toss the ball back and forth and playfully tackle each other. It was all an excuse to touch. I, however, wasn’t so playful with my tackles. I was rough. I grabbed her hard and dunked her. I couldn’t relax into touch because my primary experience of that sensation was violence. I was beat by my parents and I was beat by other kids. I didn’t know how to be nice.
Because of the trauma of his childhood, my father is a tense man. His step is heavy and his touch is unpleasant. He hates to be hugged, particularly by women other than his wife, and he is not comfortable physically displaying affection.
I had the most beautiful seventh grade teacher in the world. She looked like a movie star. She was blonde and curvy and she wore sunglasses. I wanted her to touch me but whenever she did, I flinched until she got the message to cut it out.
After I got into my 20s, I had a lot of lovers and learned to enjoy the body. Seduction became an addiction that led me to 12-step work.
I sometimes dream that if I could have only said yes to Cindy in sixth grade, my screwed up journey would not have happened. All those barriers that have blocked me off from other people and that still exist to this day, if I could have only shed them with Cindy, I would’ve been on my way to an ordinary world.
If I could’ve said yes on that afternoon in sixth grade, if I could’ve dropped a note on her desk that said, “How do we do this?”, we might’ve started talking. I might’ve learned how to connect. The barriers might’ve fallen down and the tears might’ve flowed and we might’ve built something, such as our own Moonrise Kingdom.
What if I could’ve told someone in sixth grade that my home was a horror show? That I had never seen love? Was it possible between a man and a woman? Women seemed to me like endless whirlpools of need. I hated them.
If I could’ve talked to Cindy, I might not have needed to seduce as many women as possible and to spend 12 years in the trenches of the porn industry. I might’ve learned something that sustained me for life.
Jeff* emails:
I don’t know what kind of crap your therapists have been feeding you, but as a friend who has experienced similar emotions, I’m gonna give it to you straight. Ready?
Rainy is NOT precious to you! What you are holding on to is the fantasy you’ve built up around Rainy, which bears little resemblance to her then, and certainly no resemblance to who she is now. This fantasy of her and your other girlfriends was created by you to punish yourself for your perceived inadequacies. You tell yourself, “If I had only been this way or done this or not done that, I’d be blissfully married to the perfect woman – Rainy – with 2.5 kids, a white picket fence and a dog named Shlomo”. Of course, Rainy would convert for you and change her name to Geshem.
Wake up, Luke! It’s not about them. It’s about you. You have to change the way you look at the past. Right now, you’re expending so much time, energy and emotion dwelling on things you can’t change that you’re wasting the precious time you have left. Twenty years from now, will you be sitting in front of your computer, blogging to whoever will listen about the years you wasted kvetching on FB about the previous 20 years?!
You need to look at the past as a “learning experience”. Nothing more. Learn from your past and try to avoid making those same mistakes in the future. Forgive yourself and move on, vowing to be and do better tomorrow.
According to Kaballah, the reason why we need to sleep and why the sun rises every morning is because every day is supposed to be like being freshly reborn. A new day with new opportunities. Yesterday was the past. It’s only important to learn lessons from so we can more wisely make decisions that affect our present and future.
Get out of your rut. Stop living in the past and live for now and your future. Of course, you’ll probably make mistakes along the way. Say or do something you’ll later regret. But that’s what life is about. You’ll forgive yourself and move on, realizing that nobody is perfect and we all have crap in our lives we need to deal with, no matter how cute our FB postings may seem.
Now get out there and LIVE YOUR LIFE!
Posted inPersonal, PUC|Comments Off on My Best Chance For A Normal Life
A friend says to me: Elizabeth Wurtzel is very smart, but not wise. Anyone who has conducted a thorough self examination can relate. Rod Dreher is correct in that she can’t seem to understand her own judgmental qualities. She thinks she is deeply insightful, instead of superficially insightful in a way that allows her to pretend she is being wholly honest. You should check out the pictures of her as a young woman. She was really beautiful and incredibly sexy. That provides an easy way to avoid having to address the hard issues of planning your life.
Posted inElizabeth Wurtzel|Comments Off on Elizabeth Wurtzel Confronts Herself
I couldn’t sleep last night because I felt sick about the way my reflexive hostility poisons my FB posts, my blogging, and my life. I have not directly expressed my anger at anyone in my adult life. I’ve never expressed anger at my father in my life. I just store the anger inside and it swills around and I let it go in sneaky ways and usually at innocent people. I used to express a lot of rage as an infant but I was quickly taught that was not the Christian way, so I learned to swallow those dark emotions.
I grew up watching my father incapacitate vast numbers of people. He just drove them out of their minds. I saw him reduce his critics to helpless fury. They would become incoherently angry. I thought it was funny. I still do. I grew up taking great delight in incapacitating people with anger. I learned how to say a few words and just drive them out of their minds. It’s always been my sweetest pleasure. I wouldn’t know how to live without my rage at my father. It’s like the rocket fuel that has always powered my rocket. My life would be unimaginable without it. I would have no idea about how to live. This fuel is also a poison that has nearly destroyed me and those touched by me.
I notice myself feeling hostility and rage much of the time. I just want to stick it to people. It’s not that it feels good, it’s like an addiction, like it’s out of my control. I can tamp it down, tamp it down, but there’s all this rage dying to be released. I suspect this rage goes back to my early childhood, possibly directed at my father, but what makes it so bewildering is that I have no conscious anger against anyone.
I find myself lashing out at people, but I know my rage is directed against events in my childhood. I feel in the grip of this unwanted hostility. I have my father’s attitude that the outside world is the enemy to be debunked (according to an SDA Bible scholar).
Posted inPersonal|Comments Off on I Don’t Think I’ve Directly Expressed My Anger At Anyone In My Adult Life
I have a hard time with eye contact when walking up to a person I know. If the person is a good friend or a stranger, it’s no problem, but if there’s anything troubled in our relationship or if I like her too much, I get nervous. I don’t want to maintain eye contact. I want to look away. But either option feels forced and uncomfortable. I think I didn’t get much reflection as an infant, didn’t lock eyes with my mom in my second and third year, and something’s broken as a result. So I either stare or forcefully look away. I’m sure there’s some name for this syndrome.
I first noticed my problem in 10th grade, the first year I went to public school. Prior to that, I was in a Seventh-Day Adventist cocoon and never noticed feeling uncomfortable when I saw somebody I knew walking towards me. But at public school, I started feeling uncomfortable when I wasn’t sure how to respond. How friendly should I be? How much eye contact should I maintain? If the person was a friend, it was no problem. I didn’t feel nervous. But if the person wasn’t a friend but I knew him, then I got all nervous and looked away or stared too hard and I felt myself tensing up. Do I wave? Do I acknowledge the other person? Do I wait for him to acknowledge me? What if he didn’t like something I wrote in the school newspaper? Do I always have to say hi first? Do I have the strength to wait for him to say something?
Posted inPersonal|Comments Off on I Have A Hard Time With Eye Contact
In 1998, I met a woman at synagogue. We started talking. I found her attractive, smart and accomplished. She had a PhD. She’d dated this rabbi I admired.
I started going out with this woman. After a few dates, I brought her over to my apartment. It was around September.
I showed her my website on Dennis Prager. As she read it, she started crying. “This is how you write about someone you love?” she said.
I felt strange. I thought my writing was funny.
We lay down. The neighbors were yelling. “You’ve got to get out of here,” said the woman. “You’ve got to move.”
A few days later, we hung out at the pool. It was the first time I saw her legs. They were flabby. There were no muscles. They were a big turn-off to me.
I decided to break up.
Despite my decision, or perhaps because of it, I started questioning her intensely about her life.
She’d set a rule for me, no photographing naked women for my website lukeford.com. No topless shots. No nudity.
So after I decided to break up with her, I went on a set and shot some topless photos and posted them on my website.
She called me that evening. “I guess you’ve made your decision,” she said. I agreed.
She was confused. Why had I questioned her so intensely if I was breaking up with her?
She went on to a long relationship with a friend. He later told me it was the relationship from hell.
Posted inDating, Personal|Comments Off on ‘This Is How You Write About Someone You Love?’
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)