The White Vote

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* One thing reporters never do when they disparage white voters is to thank them for giving us a functioning democracy. The fact that an all-time blowout of the total white vote for one side was 60% doesn’t seem to get mentioned in the positive light it should. Blacks routinely vote 95% for the democrats. If whites voted like that, we wouldn’t even need to have an election. It would be a forgone conclusion.

“Mr. Romney came close, running up his white vote totals in Southern states such as Mississippi (89 percent), Western states such as Arizona (66 percent) and Plains states such as Kansas (64 percent). But Mr. Obama was more competitive in the battle for the white vote elsewhere, including Colorado (44 percent), Wisconsin (48 percent), Minnesota (48 percent), Iowa (51 percent) and New Hampshire (51 percent).”

Even in MS the white vote did not break for the GOP like the black vote breaks for the democrats. And as we can see in other states, the white vote seems to be a 50-50 proposition which is up for grabs each election cycle.

“If Mr. Trump’s emotion-charged appeals to white voters increase his performance among that demographic, political physics suggests the Democratic nominee might surpass the 80 percent support from nonwhite voters that Mr. Obama attracted in 2012.”

So evidently the rest of the nonwhites averaged 80 percent for one side. Our new democracy is going to be great.

Keep in mind there are about 45 million blacks. If they were their own nation, they’d be on par with Poland. Or they would be larger than Greece, Sweden, Finland, Norway and Denmark combined. Yet they vote 90% plus for one party. Where in the world do that many people vote in those numbers for one party? I recall Saddam had a reelection in Iraq shortly before the Iraq War and won something like 99 percent of the vote. And that was in a dictatorship. Black Americans voting habits are more on par with the citizens of a dictatorship than that of a democracy.

Yet the reporters who bash the whites never give whites the credit they deserve for giving us such a vibrant democracy. Remember we only have contested elections because the white vote seems to respect the process and doesn’t bloc vote. Would it be too hard for the reporters to give them some props?

* Trump picked up the $100 bill laying on the floor by advocating for the interests of the white working class with respect to immigration and trade. There’s another $100 bill laying on the floor and everyone is ignoring it because it requires forthrightly talking about race, that $100 bill is the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Act and this could be a goldmine, like the Willie Horton ads. Do people really want to empower Democrats to destroy their home equity by diversifying their neighborhoods with inner city minorities living in Section 8 housing?

I’m betting going all-in on attacking AFFHA would neutralize anything that the Democrats would do to attract middle and upper class whites.

* If whites routinely voted 90% for one party (like blacks) or 70% for one party (like Hispanics) then America would have long been a one party state. Blacks have been voting for Clinton in the Democratic primaries at what? 70-80% levels? Even in their own party they bloc vote. WTH?

* Trump is the only Republican that can break the Democrat stranglehold on the black vote. He could win 25% of that vote and the reason? – absolute hatred of immigrants, especially Latins among working class blacks. My wife occasionally works in an inner city hospital and sees black patients. Months ago she came home in amazement and asked me: who do these patients, especially the elderly ones, love? Answer? Trump. Why? In one word, Mexicans. Now maybe the relentless media attacks will have an effect, but I doubt it. Due to the changing demographics Trump is probably the only Republican who can win now. Every Republican starts out at minus 10. Trump won’t. Hillary may find the anger of blacks does not help her.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The White Vote

Election Open Thread

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* If he quadruples the Border Patrol (Democrats like increasing the number of Federal employees) and adds the élan of a Teddy Roosevelt like contingent of mounted Border Patrol agents in the areas where a physical fence is deemed “infeasible” due to topography he will come across as a tough-minded strategic thinker with cool cavalry and mounted infantry tactical knowledge (The white guys who’ll put him over the top in the election are quite knowledgable about these sorts of thing.)

* I am predicting something is going to happen to his 757 if he continues to appear to be the nominee. I don’t think it is too hard to mess with some component so that it comes off in flight. I doubt they would want to do an Abe Lincoln on him which would be recorded by thousands of smartphones and turn him into a martyr. The plane crash due to mechanical failure is a possibility.

* The recent beheading of a young Russian girl by a Muslim nanny, who then paraded through Moscow with the head, was mostly ignored by the main Russian news sources – the same ones who went nuts with a fake story of a Russian kid being crucified by Ukrainian Christian “Nazis”. They love reporting Western problems with multiculturalism but according to nationalists they cover up crimes against ethnic Russians in their own country to protect their own multiculturalism.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Election Open Thread

Chaim Amalek: ‘Is the Washington Post calling on its readers to profile?’

WaPo Editorial: Bystanders could have helped prevent the deaths of these two young women

ON THE night that University of Virginia student Hannah Graham disappeared, two people saw her with the man later convicted of killing her. Both noticed something amiss. “He’s gonna [expletive] her up,” one witness said of Ms. Graham’s murderer; he “did not look friendly” was the assessment of another. Neither took action, which should prompt questions — not to cast blame, but to focus attention on the need to educate and empower bystanders to intervene.

New details about the circumstances surrounding Ms. Graham’s murder were revealed in court documents that accompanied the conviction and sentencing of Jesse L. Matthew Jr. In retrospect, it seems obvious that someone should have done something that Friday night in September 2014 when Ms. Graham, 18, disappeared from Charlottesville’s Downtown Mall. Likewise, people who passed by 20-year-old Morgan Harrington, another victim of Mr. Matthew, the night of Oct. 17, 2009, as she stood alone and obviously intoxicated trying to thumb a ride from a concert, probably wish they had acted differently. Law enforcement officials as well as advocates for sexual assault victims pointed to the natural tendency not to get involved; “human inertia” was the label used by one official involved in the Virginia cases.

It’s important, according to those involved in bystander intervention programs, to acknowledge that asking people to step up and do something when they see a problematic or questionable situation can be difficult. Is this really an emergency? If it’s not, won’t I be embarrassed? Why aren’t others taking action? And then there can be uncertainty about what specific action to take.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Chaim Amalek: ‘Is the Washington Post calling on its readers to profile?’

Ben Shapiro: ‘Our likely nominee is a sexist asshat’

I reply on Twitter:

* Calling a woman unwatchable is sexist? When did you become a slur merchant like the left?

* Will you soon start throwing slurs like Islamophobic, homophobic, lookist, ageist, racist (we must destroy their careers!)?

* Does the Torah ever mention the sin of sexism? Where did you get the idea of any such thing as “sexist”?

* When did Orthodox Jews start calling people “asshats”? Is that a common term in the Talmud?

* “He is a real threat, an actual threat, to the livelihoods of many Republicans living in Washington.” – @TuckerCarlson on @realDonaldTrump

Ben Shapiro finds Donald Trump in poor taste. In 2010, Ben Shapiro tweeted: “Israelis like to build. Arabs like to bomb crap and live in open sewage. This is not a difficult issue. #settlementsrock”

Posted in Ben Shapiro | Comments Off on Ben Shapiro: ‘Our likely nominee is a sexist asshat’

Murray Rothbard Would Have Loved Donald Trump

From Radix Journal:

A few months ago Richard Spencer noted that for all the hate Libertarianism Inc. was giving Donald Trump, the late libertarian polymath Murray Rothbard probably would have liked him and his candidacy quite a bit. Now that Rand Paul has dropped out, libertarians have largely abandoned electoral pursuits, and their institutions are going a bit schizophrenic, like Students for Liberty palling around with the likes of Pussy Riot and the insufferable George Will. Some of the old figures in what was termed “Paleolibertarianism” are even moving into the Trump camp. In light of all of this, let’s remind them that one of their most adored figures had quite a bit to criticize about the Current Year of his day.

Jews

Trump, despite obviously knowing many Jews in his elite New York City circles and having an adored daughter who converted to Judaism, is not afraid to tell the Republican Jewish Coalition:

“I don’t want your money, therefore you’re probably not gonna support me.”

Similarly, Murray Rothbard, despite being Jewish and having been immensely influenced by many Jewish intellectuals (Ludwig von Mises and Ayn Rand to name just two), delighted in skewering Jewish shibboleths:

Schindler’s List is a movie which has become not only Politically Incorrect but even to be less than worshipful about, since it purports to enable us, for the umpteenth time, to Learn About The Holocaust (the latter term always capitalized to emphasize solemnity and to assert its Absolute Uniqueness in the grisly world historical record of mass murder). And yet anyone who tries to Learn About History by going to a Hollywood movie deserves to have his head examined.

The Rich

Trump has become something of a “class traitor,” (as noted by everyone from the Weekly Standard to the New York Times) railing against the super rich, the job exporters, etc:

The hedge fund guys are getting away with murder. They’re paying nothing and it’s ridiculous. I want to save the middle class. The hedge fund guys didn’t build this country. These are guys that shift paper around and they get lucky.

Murray Rothbard felt the same way. After flirting a bit with Ross Perot’s first presidential candidacy, in no small part because of its Middle American Radical trappings, but more on that later, Rothbard was livid Mr. Perot dropped out (before eventually jumping back in), and noted:

Never trust a billionaire. I have had personal experience of several billionaires, and this was the conclusion that has reluctantly but inexorably forced itself upon me. Never trust them; they are killers of the very dreams they themselves create.

And do not forget, of course, that those “several billionaires” Rothbard spoke of included the infamous libertarian Koch Brothers, who had fallen out with Rothbard decades earlier, and in a state of apoplectic shock of the rise of Trump.

David Duke

The infamous maestro of White identity electoral politics has said some nice things about Trump, much to the media’s delight. And while Trump has disavowed him, the similarities between the two men are undeniably there, and Trump sure was pleased to add Louisiana to his list of victories.

Rothbard in his day defended and even admired David Duke back when he was running for governor of Louisiana, writing in 1992:

It is fascinating that there was nothing in Duke’s current program or campaign that could not also be embraced by paleoconservatives or paleo-libertarians; lower taxes, dismantling the bureaucracy, slashing the welfare system, attacking affirmative action and racial set-asides, calling for equal rights for all Americans, including whites: what’s wrong with any of that?

War

This one is simple, Trump has heroically slammed George W. Bush’s evil and moronic wars on the debate stage with other Republicans, and Rothbard never saw an anti-war alliance he did not like.

White Genocide and the Authoritarian Right

Trump has gotten plenty of flack for retweeting something an account called “White genocide” posted, along with retweeting Mussolini quotes.

Rothbard, it should be recalled, favored the Serbs in the Balkans wars, as a child trolled his Communist family by asking, “What’s so bad about [Francisco] Franco, anyway?”, and admired Joe McCarthy, writing in the early ‘90s:

The unique and the glorious thing about McCarthy was not his goals or his ideology, but precisely his radical, populist means. For McCarthy was able, for a few years, to short-circuit the intense opposition of all the elites in American life: from the Eisenhower-Rockefeller administration to the Pentagon and the military-industrial complex to liberal and left media and academic elites – to overcome all that opposition and reach and inspire the masses directly. And he did it on television, and without any real movement behind him; he had only a guerrilla band of a few advisers, but no organization and no infrastructure.

Remind you of anybody?

Pat Buchanan and the Segregationists of Yore

Trump is constantly being compared to Pat Buchanan, George Wallace, and the like. The implicit smears aside, there is a great deal of truth to this — ever hear about the Middle American Radical?

Rothbard excitedly endorsed Pat Buchanan in 1992 and supported Strom Thurmond in his college days — not to mention his identification as a copper head.

Crime

Trump talks tough on crime — and is willing to talk about the racial and immigration dynamics behind it, do I even need to bother with a link here?

Rothbard wrote:

Take Back the Streets: Get Rid of the Bums. Again: unleash the cops to clear the streets of bums and vagrants. Where will they go? Who cares? Hopefully, they will disappear, that is, move from the ranks of the petted and cosseted bum class to the ranks of the productive members of society.

Conclusion

I would like to say, in sum, the Murray Rothbard was in many ways a lot more of an “alt-right-er” than Trump is today, and probably ever will be. Rothbard personally knew and corresponded with Sam Francis, kept company with Jared Taylor, he endorsed racial separation, and as pointed out earlier, he never disavowed David Duke. Regardless, there can be no doubt that if Murray Rothbard were alive today, he would be happily riding the Trump Train.

If that’s libertarianism, count me in.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Murray Rothbard Would Have Loved Donald Trump