WP: Jerry Brown battles Calif. water crisis created by his father, Gov. Pat Brown

Posted on April 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

According to the Washington Post, California’s problem is that it has had too much water provided for it by its infrastructure. California has to learn to use less water. There’s not a word in here about investing in more infrastructure to secure more water.

I can’t take an enjoyable shower any more because the new shower heads reduce water pressure to a drizzle. It takes a long time to fill up a glass of water because the new tap heads reduce water flow. If California had no illegal immigrants, we would not need to ration water.

Chaim Amalek writes: “I keep thinking that there has to be a tipping point, a time when the accretion of lies our elites tell becomes so high and unstable that the whole thing comes crashing down on them. But it just never happens. At least not yet.”

WP: This philosophy — unlimited water for every Californian at any price — was behind Pat Brown’s massive mid-century push for water projects in the Golden State. And it’s a legacy his son, who just announced California’s first mandatory water restrictions, must endure.

“It’s a different world,” Jerry Brown said, standing in a dry stretch of the Sierra Nevadas typically under snowpack at this time of year. “We have to act differently. … The idea of your nice little green grass getting lots of water every day, that’s going to be a thing of the past.”

It’s hard to imagine a worldview more at odds with that of the current governor’s father, who ran California from 1959 to 1967 and died in 1996. Pat Brown was a water evangelist — an apostle of irrigation who exploited agribusiness’s unquenchable thirst for political gain but also sort of seemed to believe the rhetoric he bought into. He threw his weight behind funding for the California Water Project, a $1.8 billion initiative that today brings water to 25 million Californians and 750,000 acres of irrigated farmland. The project brought water from Northern California, where 80 percent of the state’s precipitation is, to Southern California, where 80 percent of its demand is.

Posted in California | Comments Off on WP: Jerry Brown battles Calif. water crisis created by his father, Gov. Pat Brown

LAT: Literacy gap between Latino and white toddlers starts early, study shows

Posted on April 2, 2015 by Luke Ford

From the Los Angeles Times:

tino toddlers whose language comprehension is roughly similar to white peers at 9 months old fall significantly behind by the time they are 2, according to a study released Thursday.

The UC Berkeley study found that four-fifths of the nation’s Mexican American toddlers lagged three to five months behind whites in preliteracy skills, oral language and familiarity with print materials.

Gee, I wonder if Latinos in America have average IQs about 90 as compared to whites with 100 and east asians with 105 and Ashkenazi Jews with 110?

It’s important to invest in the coming Latino majority.

Posted in Latino | Comments Off on LAT: Literacy gap between Latino and white toddlers starts early, study shows

Let’s Talk About Race

Posted on April 1, 2015 by Luke Ford

Robert Weissberg writes: Good news: Starbucks customers need not worry that some barista will try to engage you in an honest discussion about American race relations. The whole idea was laughed off the stage and rightly so. One comic suggested that he’d prefer to talk about free will versus determinism with the folks down at Jiffy Lube.

Unfortunately, calls for such honest, forthright and frank dialogues are irrepressible. Recall Attorney General Eric Holder’s 2009 exhortation for a national conversation. Noah C. Rothman recently offered a catalogue of such calls in his February 2015 Commentary essay. The New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristoff suggested “a new commission [that] could jump-start an overdue national conversation.” Similarly, Peniel Joseph of Tufts University called events at Ferguson a “teachable moment that could lead to a National Dialogue on Race Day.” The journalist Troy Singleton opined that “Shying away from this difficult conversation will lead only to more incidents like Ferguson and its painful aftermath.” President Obama invited a “sustained” conversation on race “to move forward in a constructive fashion.” And on and on and on.

But, admonitions aside, let me try and finally eradicate this zombie-like idea. Trigger Warning: killing the very idea that a little talk, and yet more chatter can actually solve a deeply rooted problem that has persisted for centuries will not be a pleasant sight to behold. Those made uncomfortable by genuine honesty are advised to leave the room or, if determined to have a “meaningful dialogue on matters of consequence,” visit Jiffy Lube and seek intellectual enlightenment there.

Let’s start simple. Airing out differences on emotionally laden subjects (and yakking about race guarantees high blood pressure) is not always advisable. Actually, lots of harm can happen from ill-advised frankness. Those in happy marriage know that it would be unwise to turn their 25th wedding anniversary into a two hour tête-à-tête about each other’s annoying personal hygiene habits or spousal sexual ineptitude.

A frank discussion about race relations would be far worse. I can readily see a white person working himself up into a lather when recounting the sky-high black crime rate, the awful academic performance of blacks despite trillions in government help, the relative level of dependence on government handouts and the absolute lack of any gratitude for this assistance. To which an agitated black would respond with a similarly lengthy catalogue: the legacy of slavery and discrimination, innumerable incidents of police brutality, white denial of their pernicious racism and related sins that undermine black self-respect. And this would be only round one of a 15 round championship fight.

That every one of these items has been discussed ad nauseam for half a century suggests that the purpose of this dialogue is not to provide new information or to clear the air as one might spit out a spouse’s long annoying faulty hygiene in couples therapy. Nor could it be argued that contemporary Americans need a refresher course on race — almost every item in these prospective conversations spontaneously surfaces with once-a-month regularity thanks to the mass media’s infatuation with racially charged white-on-black violence (but not the reverse).

Why then the repeated calls and the unwillingness of whites to engage African Americans? Here’s why: nearly all whites (and many Asians, too) know that the invitation is a trap, a disguised ploy to advance the racial egalitarian agenda. An opportunity to advance racial progress is just the bait. Remember Chairman Mao’s a thousand flowers to bloom campaign. This was a 1956 plan to encourage ordinary Chinese to openly criticize the Communist regime so as to promote progress in the arts and sciences. Alas, in 1957 policy was reversed and those who had expressed criticisms were rounded up, sent to prison camps or executed. “Freedom to speak” was a subterfuge from the get-go. Mao called it “enticing the snakes out of their caves.” Closer to home, one wag whose name I cannot recall, nailed it perfectly: “We need an honest conversation so we know who to fire.”

Posted in Blacks, Race | Comments Off on Let’s Talk About Race

Racist Comments Unmake Yahoo

Posted on April 1, 2015 by Luke Ford

Chris Lehman, Yahoo’s former news director, writes: Second, by far the most vocal Yahoo commenters were the most dogmatically racist; we’d joke grimly that a Yahoo commenter certificate had to be a complimentary gift to every newly enrolled member of the Klan. Seasoned front-page programmers knew that anytime we published anything touching on race relations in America, the first order of business was to disable comments on the post before it went live. Likewise, the mood among front-page programmers never got more frantic than on the occasions when we managed to push out a post that even mildly challenged the Confederate mindset with the comments still enabled.

To make matters worse, since topical reasoning was not the strong suit of this energized commentariat, its members would occasionally descend on a completely unrelated post en masse and smear it with thousands of imbecilic racist outbursts. On one unfortunate occasion, this happened to one of our posts, and before we could reverse engineer our way out of the hate-fest, the CMS system seized up; we couldn’t shut off the comments, and we couldn’t delete the post. For weeks on end, it just sat there, oozing ugly misspelled racist obscenities and brutally mocking the high-flown civic conceits of let’s-put-on-a-show digital interactivity.

Posted in Race, Yahoo | Comments Off on Racist Comments Unmake Yahoo

WP: Atlanta teen who received controversial heart transplant dies in chase with police

Posted on April 1, 2015 by Luke Ford

It is important that we provide new hearts to criminals in need. Seems like a good use of a couple of million dollars so a bloke can break into more homes.

Chaim Amalek writes: “What sick ways you have of thinking about the rest of the world! Were you still living in your Father’s House, eating at his table and praying to his Savior, I’ve no doubt you would not be dabbling with all of this hateful white supremecism of late. If ever there was a man the love of Jesus could save from hatred, it is you, Luke. I think that tomorrow, Maundy Thursday, would be a good day for you to start getting back in right with the Lord.”

REPORT: In 2013, then-15-year-old Anthony Stokes was dying and desperately needed a heart transplant that he couldn’t get because, according to doctors, he had “a history of noncompliance.”

Stokes’s family suspected that his low grades and a history of trouble with the law gave doctors reason to believe that he would not be willing to take his medicine or show up at subsequent doctor’s visits. The Georgia teen’s story story sparked outrage, and the hospital quickly reversed its decision, giving him priority on the transplant list.

But two years later, after he received a transplant, Stokes’s “second chance” has come to an abrupt end.

Tuesday afternoon, Stokes died after a vehicle he was driving jumped a curb, hit a pedestrian and collided with a pole in a car chase with police, according to WSBTV.

The pedestrian was hospitalized for her injuries, and Stokes’s car was nearly split in half by the sign, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Police said he had to be cut out of the Honda by first responders and rushed to a hospital, where he later died.

“He lost control and there was a long set of skid marks,” Roswell Police Department spokeswoman Lisa Holland told WXIA.

According to Holland, Stokes was driving a car that matched the description of one used by a person suspected of breaking into an elderly woman’s home. The chase began after officers responding to her 911 call attempted to pull Stokes over, according to WXIA…

It is unclear what exactly caused doctors to change their assessment of Stokes two years ago, but he told WSBTV that he viewed the opportunity as a chance to start over.

The transplant allowed him to “live a second chance. Get a second chance and do things I want to do,” he said.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on WP: Atlanta teen who received controversial heart transplant dies in chase with police

America & Race

Posted on April 1, 2015 by Luke Ford

Paul Johnson writes in Modern Times:

The notion of a fusion of races in America was as old as Hector Crevecoeur and Thomas Jefferson. It was dramatized with sensational effect in Israel Zangwill’s play The Melting-pot, which was the New York hit of 1908. The new motion-picture industry, which was from its inception the epitome of multi-racialism, was obsessed by the idea, as many of its early epics testify. But with what proportions of ingredients should the pot be filled? By the time of the Great War, unrestricted immigration already appeared a lost cause. In 1915 an itinerant Georgian minister, William Simmons, founded the Ku Klux Klan as an organization to control minority groups which it identified with moral and political nonconformity. Its aims were powerfully assisted by the publication, the following year, of Madison Grant’s presentation, in an American context, of European ‘master-race’ theory, The Passing of the Great Race, This quasi-scientific best-seller argued that America, by unrestricted immigration, had already nearly ‘succeeded in destroying the privilege of birth; that is, the intellectual and moral advantages a man of good stock brings into the world with him’. The result of the ‘melting-pot’, he argued, could be seen in Mexico, where ‘the absorption of the blood of the original Spanish conquerors by the native Indian
population’ had produced a degenerate mixture ‘now engaged in demonstrating its incapacity for self-government’. The virtues of the ‘higher races’ were ‘highly unstable’ and easily disappeared ‘when mixed with generalized or primitive characters’. Thus ‘the cross between a white man and a Negro is a Negro’ and ‘the cross between any of the three European races and a Jew is a Jew’.

This fear of ‘degeneration’ was used by Hiram Wesley Evans, a Dallas dentist and most effective of the Klan leaders, to build it up into a movement of Anglo-Saxon supremacist culture which at one time had a reputed 4 million members in the East and Midwest. Evans, who called himself ‘the most average man in America’, asserted that the Klan spoke ‘for the great mass of Americans of the old pioneer stock … of the so-called Nordic race which, with all its faults, has given the world almost the whole of modern civilization’. A racial pecking-order was almost universally accepted in political campaigning, though with significant variations to account for local voting-blocks. Thus, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, in private an unqualified Anglo-Saxon supremacist, always used the prudent code-term ‘the English-speaking people’ when campaigning. Will Hays, campaign manager for Warren Harding, comprehensively summed up the candidate’s lineage as ‘the finest pioneer blood, Anglo-Saxon, German, Scotch-Irish and Dutch’.

America’s entry into the Great War gave an enormous impetus to a patriotic xenophobia which became a justification for varieties of racism and a drive against nonconformity…

A more permanent consequence was the 1921 Quota law which limited immigration in any year to 3 per cent of the number of each nationality in the USA according to the census of 1910. This device, whose object was to freeze the racial balance as far as possible, was greatly tightened by the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924, which limited the quota to 2 per cent of any nationality residing in the USA in 1890. It debarred Japanese altogether (though Canadians and Mexicans were exempt) and not only cut the earlier quota but deliberately favoured Northern and Western Europe at the expense of Eastern and Southern Europe. With a further twist of the screw in 1929, based on racial analysis of the USA population in the 1920s, the legislation of the 1920s brought mass immigration to America to an end. Arcadia was full, its drawbridge up, its composition now determined and to be perpetuated….

There was an important point here: America, if it was anything, was a Protestant-type religious civilization…

In fact the East Coast highbrows were by no means helpless. Over the next sixty years they were to exercise an influence on American (and world) policy out of all proportion to their numbers and intrinsic worth. But they were ambivalent about America. In the spring of 1917, Van Wyck Brooks wrote in Seven Arts, the journal he helped to found, ‘Towards a National Culture’, in which he argued that hitherto America had taken the ‘best’ of other cultures: now it must create its own through the elementary experience of living which alone produced true culture. America, by experiencing its own dramas, through what he termed ‘the Culture of Industrialism’, would ‘cease to be a blind, selfish, disorderly people; we shall become a luminous people, dwelling in the light and sharing our light’. 11 He endorsed his friend Randolph Bourne’s view that the whole ‘melting-pot’ theory was unsound since it turned immigrants into imitation Anglo-Saxons, and argued that America ought to have not narrow European nationalism but ‘the more adventurous ideal’ of cosmopolitanism, to become ‘the first international nation’. 12 But what did this mean? D.H. Lawrence rightly observed that America was not, or not yet, ‘a blood-homeland’. Jung, putting it another way, said Americans were ‘not yet at home in their unconscious’. Brooks, deliberately settling into Westport, Connecticut, to find his American cosmopolitanism, together with other Twenties intellectuals whom he neatly defined as ‘those who care more for the state of their minds than the state of their fortunes’, nevertheless felt the strong pull of the old culture; he confessed, in his autobiography, to ‘a frequently acute homesickness for the European scene’. Only ‘a long immersion in American life’, he wrote, ‘was to cure me completely of any lingering fear of expatriation; but this ambivalence characterized my outlook in the Twenties.’ 13 In May 1919, hearing that a friend, Waldo Frank, planned to settle in the Middle West, he wrote to him: ‘All our will-to-live as writers comes to us, or rather stays with us, through our intercourse with Europe. Never believe people who talk to you about the west, Waldo; never forget that it is we New Yorkers and New Englanders who have the monopoly of whatever oxygen there is in the American continent.’

Posted in America | Comments Off on America & Race

Can I demand that a Jewish baker make me a Hitler cake?

Posted on April 1, 2015 by Luke Ford

How is that different from demanding that religious people serve your big fat gay wedding?

Chaim Amalek writes: “I want some gay goy to demand a Hasid in Borough Park bake him a wedding cake. Just to watch our politicians and journalists hide.”

Ace of Spades writes: The zealots are not claiming that we must be tolerant towards all — that is a principle most could agree with.

No, they are instead claiming we must embrace the things they love, and hate — and persecute — the things they hate.

This is not “tolerance.” This is, at best, simply the replacement of one set of bigotries and hatreds with the
left’s favored set of bigotries and hatreds.

This WSJ is worth a read, though it gets, I think, pretty deceptive in its middle part. The WSJ says that opponents of Indiana’s RFRA law “claim” that the law would “empower” florists and wedding photographers to “discriminate” against gay weddings.

That’s not the claim, Old Bean. That’s the entire point.

And it signals how lost this issue is when not even the defenders of the RFRA can even admit the law’s purpose. They seem compelled to pretend this bit about refusing service to gay weddings is just some hypothetical crazy talk.

It’s not. It’s the whole point. And we should not be afraid to say so.

I don’t disagree with those who refuse to serve gay weddings, and I don’t necessarily agree with them, either. I don’t have to. That is the point of tolerance — not that I either disagree or agree with someone’s decision or someone’s self-expression, but that I support his rights to decide for himself, and express himself, as he sees fit.

My agreement with his decisions or speech — my disgust with it — my sympathies for it — my hatred of it — irrelevant, because I am not weighing in on the speech or decision itself — merely whether I believe an American has a right to so speak or so decide.

And on that matter, I most emphatically do support their right to decide or speak as they would.

Posted in Homosexuality | Comments Off on Can I demand that a Jewish baker make me a Hitler cake?

Stand Up To Bigotry!

Posted on April 1, 2015 by Luke Ford

We need to act more quickly on Hate Speech. The sooner we mitigate the First Amendment with laws against Hate Speech, the sooner we can get rid of criticism of Jews through “unintended consequences” of their implementation. We probably won’t be able to as easily put guys like Steve Sailer in jail or even shut them down like we will Daily Stormer and Stormfront, but we don’t need to. We will certainly be able to tie them up in time-consuming government lawsuits. Our side will be paid for by the government in cost and labor. Their side will be paid for by scarce private resources. And think of the chilling effect! The important thing about Hate Speech laws is that it frames the conversation properly. It isn’t whether or not something is true, but rather, whether it is “hate;” whether it is legal.

This free speech thing was tolerable most of the time I guess before the internet, but we just can’t justify it in the internet age. Not passing Hate Crimes laws is in fact ignoring the problem, and it is irresponsible from a communal position.

From the ADL:

In honor of our Centennial Year in 2013, the Anti-Defamation League launched the “Imagine a World Without Hate” video and action campaign, and we invite you to participate.

Take just 80 seconds of your time to watch this powerful video, which imagines a world without racism, homophobia or anti-Semitism — a world in which the hate violence that took the lives of Martin Luther King Jr., Anne Frank, Daniel Pearl, Matthew Shepard and others did not happen. Imagine what these individuals could have continued to contribute to society if bigotry, hate and extremism had not cut their lives tragically short.

After 100 years of fighting bigotry and fostering respect, we are celebrating our successes, while at the same time recognizing that we still have a long way to go to achieve the reality of a world without hate. Join us by watching, sharing and taking steps every day to create a world without hate. Thank you for stepping up to create a world without hate as an individual, community, school or corporation.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Censorship | Comments Off on Stand Up To Bigotry!

The Liberal Jewish Crack-Up

Posted on April 1, 2015 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes: …the big trend of 2015, following the anti-Semitic massacres by Muslims in Europe, is that the group that dominates the contemporary mindset, ethnocentric liberal Jews, are starting to feel the pressure on the obvious logical contradictions between their sensible is-it-good-for-the-Jews ethnocentrism and their public avowals of diversity uber alles.

…everybody knows that, even without Iovine, Jewish music executives played an outsized role in the gangsta rap that persuaded so many impressionable young black idiots to become crack dealers…

Jewish comedians have been joking about their people’s mania for expensive German cars at least since the 1970s when, in my recollection, the Mercedes-Benz 450 SL convertible was the pre-eminent car in Beverly Hills. But how Jewish is Trevor Noah? Is he ethnically privileged enough to joke about Jews and German cars or not?

…Why comparing Jewish women’s apparent respect for their virtue to the world’s greatest soccer player’s respect for competition rather than for fakery is supposed to be anti-Semitic is unexplained. But that’s not the point, the point is that you aren’t supposed to joke about Jews if you aren’t officially Jewish.

…In America, the 97% of the population who aren’t either Jews or anti-Semites are pretty much intellectually disarmed by crimestop. It’s fascinating to try to list members of the 97% who kept their wits when it comes to thinking about Jewish influence in America. Off the top of my head, I can think of the obvious examples of Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Richard Nixon who together in 1969 conjured up neoconservatism by deliberately exploiting the Jewish ethnocentrism revivified by the 1967 Six-Day-War to get more Jewish intellectuals to support America in the Cold War. But in the last 45 years, I can only come up with a handful of names of gentiles who haven’t been intimidated: John Updike (for his good-natured series about the Jewish novelist Bech), and …

COMMENTS:

* It’s not that the typical white gentile American is intimidated into going along with Jews, it’s that he is eagerly, willingly, zealoulsy pro-Jewish in a way which he would never feel comfortable being pro-his-own-group. A lot of these people are more fanatically pro-Jewish than is the typical American Jew! It’s a strange psychological trait and one which has never received the exploration it deserves.

In spite of what some commenters on this blog seem to believe, this sort of thinking is not limited to “evangelical Christians”.

* A real stinging and relevant Jewish joke today wouldn’t be about Jews pinching pennies but about Jews throwing massive amounts of money to buy up politicians and other people in positions of influence. Even this Trevor Noah controversy is all about how Jews should throw their money around. Is it a lucrative deal to offer millions to this comedian who goes by South African cultural rules and isn’t properly sensitive about ‘American’ rules that have been rejiggered by Jews.

Indeed, Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban would be far less dangerous if they pinched pennies than if they threw hundreds of millions at politicians who grovel at their feet.

Jordan Belfort and Benrie Madoff were NOT penny-pinching Jews but Jews who threw their money around, and they turned out to be far more dangerous than penny pinching Jewish pawnbrokers of old.

* Trevor’s mild jokes about Jews get noticed but his stridently anti-white views sserve to burnish his resumé.

MORE COMMENTS:

* Dear god where do all these smug, opinionated Jewish broads come from and who keeps paying them to write the shit they write?

* Noah should reference Alyssa’s post on his first episode, and say that, in response, he made sure at least 50% of his writers were Jewish, in order to do his part to combat Jewish underrepresentation in comedy writing.

* Every article on this is saying the same thing. If you wanna be in showbiz ya better repent! These writers are so damn obvious. It’s unbelievable that people can’t see how these writers all seem to work in concert with each other. It’s like how the one of the articles from the earlier post made it seem like random curious people just happened to look into this, only to be shocked at what they found. As if there were a groundswell of concerned citizens, rather than organized activists who base their life on vetting celebrities and other noteworthy people to make sure their views and interests are aligned with their own.

* Interesting comparing the professional headshot of Rosenberg at WaPo to the image grab from BloggingHeads or whatever that is. What a difference professional makeup, lighting, and camera work makes. Computer cameras aren’t too flattering for most people.

* Between Rosenberg and Claire Cain Miller, it’s almost as if there’s a contest about who can more flamboyantly eschew logic. Rosenberg’s argument — that hiring ethnic minorities is a way for a comedy show to avoid offending people — refutes itself. Comedy Central just did that with Trevor Noah and look what happened.

* Fat, Jewish chicks are not funny.

What is funny is that fat, Jewish chicks think they are sexy.

* Background: Billy Gordon is an aboriginal who was recently elected into the state parliament of Queensland. His history of domestic violence is beginning to surface, and some people are calling for him to resign because of this. But others are saying that this is just another witch hunt of an aboriginal man, blah blah. It’s interesting because domestic violence against women is presently the national talking point. Most people associate “wife beaters” with “Bogans” , but the reality is that aboriginal women experience the highest rate of domestic violence, perpetrated by…aboriginal men.

* I bet this mulatto mischling is pretty stunned he’s being called an anti-semite for these totally non-offensive jokes, when Jon Stewart played with Jewish stereotypes quite a bit on his show.

Seems like as the number of mischlings increases, the full-Jews feel the need to crack down on them, so gentiles don’t get the idea that Jews are fair game for comedy.

The worst case scenario would be someone like Dieudonné M’bala M’bala becoming popular with non-white Americans.

* The larger question is how come so many foreigners are getting top slots on our TV chat shows? ANSWER: Its an end run around hiring white American guys who are all racist patriarchal oppressors. Instead you hire a white Brit for your Late Show. Or this Noah because you figure he can get away with more un-PC humor due to his foreign black status. Plus Africans immigrating to America is in these days. Our awful president is an African immigrant. Almost.

There is a very busy and hip buffet near me and every single black guy working there is from Africa. And they have quite a few. American blacks need not apply. The crowd they attract is multi-racial, white, Hispanic etc 30 year olds and some with children. The foods are clean, grilled, non-greasy plus a sushi selection. Happening food for the young and diverse. Yep, I like their food and go there.

* Just like Dieudonne, Noah will learn the hard way that he is ranked lower in the victimhood rankings than jews.

Regarding Sailer not having heard of Noah, he is a coloured from South Africa, but unlike the traditional coloureds his mother was black and father white, the normal coloureds have been mixing only with themselves for a long time. He is also not very PC and sees everyone as fair game in his comedy, in South Africa jews and whites are seen as more similar by the non whites, than jews and whites are seen in America. Also in South Africa blacks are at the number one rank of the victimhood pantheon, not the jews.

He notices things, but he clearly is not aware that America very tightly controls what you can notice and say, so like I said at the start, he is going to learn the hard way how society in America works…

* This reminds me of what happened to Razib & the NY Times.

So the takeaway is not to selected talented unknown people of colour because of controversial statements in the past.

The safer choice is to pick someone whose parents were adroit enough to enrol them in diversity classes in private school. So essentially the Establishment gets to perpetuate itself while maintaining the aura of diversity.

* I too feel that Jews are terribly under-represented in the media and unable to defend themselves.

* I hope the old media and academia put wet blankets like Alyssa Rosenberg in every job they can. I hope they drown in this stuff for at least another decade. The rest of us will get on with our lives beyond their mundane little cultural swamp.

Just thinking about them gives me that heavy, frustrated and entangled feeling of trying to get through a swamp. Social justice warriors are the Swamp People and that’s what they should be called. Actually, the terms “Social Justice Warrior People” and “SWPLs” can be mated and turned into “swampies” with a little imagination.

Alyssa Rosenberg is a swampy. Just occupying the same mental space as her immediately gives a person that feeling of being entangled in a swamp. Laughter and joy die in a swamp and in the presence of people like Alyssa Rosenberg.

MORE COMMENTS:

* Although I love the irony of Comedy Central replacing the Jewish host of the Daily Show with an anti-Semitic one, otherwise it seems like the most bizarre choice ever. If they wanted to go the affirmative action route and hire a Person of Color, why not get an American comedian who might actually have some basis to understand the American political scene that you’re expected to talk about 5 nights a week?

* Mr Foxman of course says,

“And we hope that he and Comedy Central will make a conscious effort to ensure that ‘The Daily Show’ remains funny and irreverent without trafficking in bigoted jokes at the expense of Jews, other minorities and women.”

So we can assume that he thinks trafficking in bigoted jokes at the expense of white gentile men is just fine. Of course he does.

* PC totalitarianism is a privilege that only rich Westerners can afford to indulge in. Poor countries like South Africa don’t have that luxury.

I recall a couple of years ago an Afrikaner man who worked as an air traffic controller at Johannesburg International was caught on the loudspeaker calling an African worker a “Kaffir”. Not only did he not lose his job but the black workers at the airport didn’t even pretend that they cared.

* If you believe culture determines everything, and ‘culture’ is malleable, the only way to see the change you wish for is to control it completely. The slightest deviation can derail [another annoying buzz word] attempts at such change. And the only way you can convince people to adhere to such rigidity is to believe yourself that allowing said deviations will, if you really think about it, lead inexorably to female manumission. If a joke (an accurate one at that) about large women is let slide, the next thing you know women everywhere will be losing the right to vote and own property. This is crazy, but within their intellectual framework, it’s logical.

* You can detect the nervousness of the Atlantic staffers. They recognize that the Daily Show is not just a comedy show but is a tool for indoctrinating young viewers (as noted by Jamie Weinstein) and they do not want to lose control of that. They are worried that this unknown South African dude might not be on their team. Hence they urge him and the Daily Show to “try harder” and “be better in the future”; i.e., get with the program, African guy.

* There’s a hilarious anecdote about Redd Foxx and S and S. At one point he started getting racially conscious and told the producers to fire all the joke writers and hire only blacks. After a few weeks of declining ratings, he told his producers: Get rid of these motherfuckers and get me some jews!

* The Atlantic article’s insistence that these jokes aren’t funny reveals how threatened they are by humor.

The coalition of the fringes is more vulnerable to mockery than the core, and if they lose the reins of mainstream comedy, they’re toast.

Hence, they have to whip the troops into shape with a constant drumbeat of “not funny! Not funny! Thou shalt not laugh!”

Because you know, if people are allowed to just laugh at what they find funny, who knows what disaster may befall us.

* US is a liberal democracy by law, but Jews have gained such total domination in government finance, entertainment, and media that they impose and run the Narrative like communist governments used to do. Everyone in the US knows he or she is finished if he or she displeases Jews. The ONLY thing Rick Sanchez said is Jews made it in the US, they are rich, and very prominent in the media. That was enough for him to be blacklisted worse than the Hollywood Ten (who were Stalinists and real scumbags).

Because everyone fears Jews, no one says anything that might be construed as insulting to Jews. Only Jews can say some funny or biting stuff about Jews, but Jews take pride in this as example of their own self-criticism and ability to laugh at themselves. But it is monopolized ONLY by Jews. It’s like a dictator of a nation making a joke about himself to show that he’s an fun easy-going guy but then forbids ANYONE ELSE to do likewise. So, even his self-mockery is a form of narcissism. “I’m not only so very great but sort of humble and don’t take myself too seriously.” It’s like Mao who forced all Chinese to worship him as a god but then told Edgar Snow with false modesty that he’s irritated by all the cult of personality and only wishes to be remembered as a teacher, ‘a school teacher’ at that.

* Perhaps we should stop pussyfooting around the truth. Jews are starting to read the handwriting on the wall. Jews should be hyper sensitive about negative speech towards them, because their tribal Zionism and oligarch bankers are doing America and the West a great disservice.

They are repeating the same pattern of activity that got them in trouble in Germany in the last century and the many centuries before that. They tribally conspire to take over their host culture, hurting that culture. Clearly they have accomplish that in America – clearly we are currently beginning to live that hurt – and sadly for all, it is just starting.

* It always astounds me that Jews never seem to make the connection between their behaviour (such as that you refer to) and an eventual explosion of goyim resentment, which is always portrayed as resulting from mindless bigotry.

You’d image that absorbing this vital lesson would represent a major step forward for their ethnic evolutionary strategy. As well as a God-send for the rest of us!

* This Twitter hysterical lynch mob attack phenomena is a female thing . Back in 1991 when I left the best job I ever had (99%) men and went into a “profession” that was 99% female , it took me about 3 months to figure out how they work . They stick together no matter what . I learned very quickly that any time the swarm noticed any hint of a hive member in distress they would turn and attack the source (me) as one , reflexively , like a group of white blood cells clumping around a foreign invader . For them there is no right or wrong in any conflict there is only the instinctive group solidarity and instinctive drive to kill .
Eventually as a matter of survival I adapted and even thrived , got laid and made some friends but with a few exceptions developed a deep and lasting contempt for women as a group .

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on The Liberal Jewish Crack-Up

America Should Copy Israel’s Immigration Policies

Posted on April 1, 2015 by Luke Ford

Chaim Amalek writes: “Nebech! What are all the liberal Hollywood Jews going to say or do about this? What will the ADL say or do? What will the SPLC say or do? I wish the media would not cover this story, as nothing good can come of it.”

Forward: Israel will begin deporting African migrants to third countries without their consent.
The migrants, from Eritrea and Sudan, will be sent to a southern Israeli prison if they refuse, Haaretz reported, citing the Interior Ministry. Israel’s attorney general, Yehuda Weinstein, approved the process, under which the migrants will be given 30 days notice before being told to which third country they will be traveling. No timetable was given for the deportations.
Some 42,000 Eritrean and Sudanese citizens are living in Israel, with 2,000 in the Holot detention facility, where residents are required to check in twice a day. Many have made their home in south Tel Aviv.
Israel has granted official refugee status to just four of more than 5,500 official asylum seekers.
Approximately 1,500 African migrants have been sent to Uganda and Rwanda over the past year in voluntary departures. The Israeli government provided them with airplane tickets and grants.
Israel as a signatory to international refugee conventions may not deport asylum seekers to their countries of origin if their lives would be in danger. If the asylum seeker is sent to a third country, Israel must secure an agreement that they will be treated fairly and have basic rights.
Many of the migrants who voluntarily left for Rwanda and Uganda, having no basic rights, left their third countries and again became refugees, Haaretz reported.

Posted in Immigration, Israel | Comments Off on America Should Copy Israel’s Immigration Policies