How can we defeat ISIS if we refuse to identify terrorists’ theological DNA?

By Rabbi Abraham Cooper, Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein Published March 30, 2016:

The fact is that the Obama administration’s legacy when it comes to terror attacks has been to avoid highlighting or even acknowledging the Islamist theology of hate that is a common denominator and motivator of unspeakable crimes against humanity launched by ISIS, Al Qaeda, Al Shabab and Boko Haram in Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and yes, the United States.

Tragically, the initial failure by the U.S. to acknowledge that the suicide bomber who blew himself up among the swings and sliding ponds was looking to murder and maim Christian families, is not surprising.

While public opinion long ago connected the dots of Islamist anti-Christian propaganda to their genocidal actions in Syria and Iraq, it took a congressional resolution to finally force Secretary of State John Kerry to recently admit that yes, Christians and Yazidis were victims of an attempted genocide. And, for decades, Europe’s elite had their eyes wide shut to the hate burgeoning Islamist networks in their own cities and are only now playing a deadly game of catch up.

The disgraceful NSC statement on Sunday wouldn’t have made any difference to the terrorists, so at this late stage in the Obama administration, what difference does it make how the latest atrocity is characterized by Washington?

For one thing, an emphatic and empathetic statement from the White House would have sent a message of solidarity to the beleaguered Christians of our sometime ally Pakistan.

Secondly, Lahore was not the first, only the latest site for Islamist fanatics targeting religious minorities, and not just Christians.

Sky News is now reporting that ISIS militants recently arrested in Turkey revealed their (active) plans to attack Jewish kindergartens in that country and to attack (again) Istanbul’s Great Synagogue.

Embedded in the DNA of the Islamist fanatics is a theologically fueled and validated hate for the “Kafir” (a person who is not Muslim).

There are countless plots in the terror pipeline, on every continent targeting Muslims and non-Muslims alike who dare to stand up to the fanatics.

But just how do we go about killing the message along with the genocidal messengers without attacking the cancerous DNA?

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on How can we defeat ISIS if we refuse to identify terrorists’ theological DNA?

Euphoric Recall Has Been A Major Party Of My Life

I never even heard of this term until last week. Now I seizing on it. It’s going to usher in a new level of sobriety for me.

When an addict is in euphoric recall, you’re probably not emotionally sober.

Pretty much every emotional addiction or process addiction I’ve learned about I will cop to. Excitement is dangerous for an addict and euphoric recalls are exciting. Perhaps I need to add euphoric recall to my list of bottom line behaviors to avoid.

Man, how much lust is a sex addict allowed to enjoy? It seems like for the addict, the less you have, the better (unless it is for your spouse in the present moment).

Link: “Bottom-line Behavior: Sex and love addiction is more complicated than alcoholism or drug addiction in that it may manifest itself in patterns that vary from addict to addict. Because of this fact, in SLAA, we each define our own sobriety, and the behavior(s) that we determine to constitute our addiction we call our bottom-line behavior. A common basic bottom line is to avoid sex outside of a committed relationship. Members may also include on their bottom-line going to a particular place, contacting a particular person, watching a certain kind of movie or program, avoiding pornography, dressing provocatively, cruising for partners or even allowing oneself to drift off into all-consuming fantasy — in short avoiding anything that causes us to plunge back into our addiction. The participation of a sober sponsor is essential in setting your bottom-line. Only we ourselves can determine which behaviors are addictive for us, but our addiction may blind us to the realities of our behavior; we need the assistance of a loving outsider and a Higher Power to assist us in this process. Typically, our bottom line will change as we progress in recovery. The initial bottom line may be changed, as we see the need, to include behaviors that we did not previously recognize as addictive. This process continues until the addict reaches a comfortable and manageable pattern of living. The process of establishing our bottom line, like much else in recovery from this disease, is a trial and error process. We may even have to modify our behavior with our spouses and significant others.”

Link: “An addict’s behavior is not usually as spontaneous as it may seem. Instead, it often begins as thoughts and fantasies of the mind. Known as euphoric recall, this thought process usually begins the stimulation of endorphins within the addictive neuropathways of the brain. Once this process is initiated, it can be very difficult for an addict to ignore compelling urges to engage in the behaviors that he or she perceives to provide pleasure “highs.” Because euphoric recall starts with only a thought, it can be one of the biggest hurdles a recovering sex addict must face during and after rehabilitation. For many addicts, choosing not to act on addiction-related sexual urges following euphoric recall can be tremendously overwhelming.”

SLAA: “Euphoric recall is becoming lost in our remembrance of past addictive behavior, recalling that behavior as ecstatic rather than insane. In euphoric recall, we totally fail to recollect the massively negative consequences of that behavior, which have brought us to SLAA. For most of us, euphoric recall is one of the first steps on the road to acting out and losing our sobriety. Our euphoric recall may even affect others: excessive detail in talking about our acting out in a meeting may trigger addictive thoughts in other members’ minds. We are in meetings to share our experience, strength, and hope. Euphoric recall has no place in that sharing.”

Wikipedia: “Euphoric recall is a psychological term for the tendency of people to remember past experiences in a positive light, while overlooking negative experiences associated with that event(s). Euphoric recall has been cited as a factor in substance dependence, as well as anger problems. Individuals may become obsessed with recreating the remembered pleasures of the past.”

Link:

Because the formation and recollection of memories is managed in this same area, the brain may choose only to bring to mind the fun times or highlights of past drug use. The user will not remember the pain, sickness, destruction, disappointment or trapped feelings of addiction – only the good times. This can lead a person to romanticize their previous substance abuse and spend too much time thinking back on it longingly. This type of distorted memory can also lead people to feel overconfident in their ability to resist relapse, which may cause them to place themselves in high-risk environments. A recovering alcoholic, when walking past a bar, may think back to some fun times and then tell himself that he can handle the temptation to drink now. He goes into the bar where the positive memories collide with his weakened state of alertness; before he knows it, he has relapsed.
How to Stop Euphoric Recall
While you cannot stop euphoric recall, one of the most powerful tools to overcome it is through relational accountability. Make sure you have a friend or sponsor who you have especially empowered to hold you accountable for your time, words, money and actions. Another person can provide the accurate perspective that euphoric recall destroys. You may start to become nostalgic for your party days, but a good accountability partner will remind you of the broken relationships, the misery of withdrawal and the positive aspects of being clean and sober. Journaling can also be extremely helpful – especially as it relates to identifying faulty or incomplete memories and filling in those gaps during weak moments. In time you can train your mind to remember all aspects of the disease of addiction, not just the distorted ones.

Link:

Cravings are nothing but extremely powerful memories of pleasure (euphoric recall) brought on by drug use. It’s also estimated that “euphoric recall” registers two to ten times stronger in the hippocampus than any other pleasurable activity – even sex! So if someone has told you in your first few days of sobriety the best way to deal with cravings is to play the tape back by remembering how bad things got the last time you used, you may not have much success, because euphoric recall is so powerful, it overrides negative memories.

So what is the solution? The solution is to rid oneself of euphoric recall! And it’s a lot easier than you might think and here’s why: if euphoric recall is nothing but a memory, don’t most memories fade in time? For example, I’ve forgotten how to speak Japanese, only because I no longer use it living in California.

It’s estimated that cravings begin to attenuate in about three months, and by the sixth month they are usually gone. Of course there are some exceptions to the rule, for some people cravings may never go away completely. However, they will be a lot fainter and easier to manage than they were in early sobriety.

Compulsive Solutions:

Following is an example of how the dialogue modality works for sex addiction and/or porn addiction. If you’ve worked with me, you know all about this technique we use to help our clients shed light on the mental and emotional parts of themselves that produce sexually compulsive behavior…
This is the dialog of a client who was wrestling with what is known as “Euphoric Recall” — the memory (in his case) of a highly charged sexualized moment. By writing these thoughts down, then sending them to me, and receiving feedback he is learning to anchor in the truth of the situation rather than the fantasy. This is helping him drop the old negative sexualized story that sustained his addiction and kept him from true intimacy. We share this with you so you too can drop your old story.
Friday afternoon I was driving with my family to Miami for vacation. I knew I was going to past right by the part of Miami where Callie lives. I had prepared myself for this and figured I had it under control.
However, I noticed that the closer I got to Miami the more my stomach tightened into a knot. I had snuck down to Miami one day during the week to spend time with Callie. This was obviously stupid and looking back on it I see how dim-witted it was to do this.
So I started dialoging with my mind and my Euphoric Recall to figure out what was going on.
CHARLIE: What’s going on mind? I can feel my stomach tightening which is I know is being caused as an emotion due to your thought process, what’s happening?
EUPHORIC RECALL: We’re close to Miami…
CHARLIE: yeah I know
EUPHORIC RECALL: She lives there, it’s such a wonderful place, and we had such a good time with her when we were there.
CHARLIE: Yes, but it was very stupid for me to do that. We cheated on our wife for God’s sake!
EUPHORIC RECALL: Don’t you just wish you could be single, living in Miami, hanging out with her whenever you wanted? Free of responsibility and just feel those feelings?
CHARLIE: Feelings aren’t facts. Yes, Miami is nice, but we have a life here in Virginia.
EUPHORIC RECALL: I know, but its fun to think about and fantasize about.
CHARLIE: For what purpose? What good will it really do?
EUPHORIC RECALL: It just feels good.
CHARLIE: That may be true, but it’s a distraction. It would be robbing my family of my time, attention and energy. What I have right now (with my wife and family) is amazing and great, why fantasize about something that isn’t real, and I know nothing about? A couple of short weeks of infatuation can’t tell you crap. Period! Plus Callie has moved on and gone (which is a good thing).
EUPHORIC RECALL: Well what about these feelings?
CHARLIE: They’re just an escape. You see we aren’t using sexual behavior anymore as an escape. That compulsion is being taken care of. Remember? George at Compulsion Solutions? We’re sober now…except for “you.” You’re trying a different form of escape: Euphoric Recall. The problem is that this is not helpful and can eventually lead us back to sexually compulsive behavior. Remember the dark miserable place we climbed out of? I, We won’t be going back there. Feelings aren’t facts and we need to face our reality, not fight or escape it.
EUPHORIC RECALL: The fantasies are so much better.
CHARLIE: They may seem that way, but, I promise you, life is better lived than you ever dreamed or fantasized. Remember your Essence… what George taught you… what’s ALWAYS true. Ask yourself, “What’s always true?” Let’s come “home” to Self. No more “stories.” No more soap opera. Let’s enjoy life, rather than fantasize about it. Being here NOW is so much better and fulfilling.

Dr. Sarah Ullman writes:

What is the big fat problem if you only think about something sexual but do not act on it? I am pretty certain that if you were to ask a slew of random folks – people whose spouse or significant other spends time – any amount of time – traversing internet porn sites, they would say that the person is cheating on them. More than likely they would tell you that it just feels like they are being cheated on. That they feel insignificant or secondary and that their partner is not “present” especially during intimacy. And most clinicians would agree. Now add to that scenario the fact that the person checking out porn on the net is a sex addict. Make that a recovering sex addict. Now you have a really big problem indeed. And the problem is that the sex addict in recovery is no longer sober, forget recovery, if their eyeballs are mopping up pornographic images. Be that on the net, the tube, the VCR, or in print. It may or may not be “cheating” if you occasionally indulge in a non-secretive manner – providing you are not also sexually addicted.

Sex, or more to the point sexual behavior, does not contrary to popular belief, emanate from the body. Sexual arousal is neurological. The body simply complies. But hold that thought.

Internet porn is to the sex addict what a seat at the pub while holding a glass of liquor is to the alcoholic – but worse. Much much worse. The alcoholic may not have taken a drink – yet. But chances are better than not that they will. Worse however for the sex addict, since the act of just watching pornographic images, immediately sets off a spectacular flare of dopaminergic fireworks. The actual visual impact triggers the sex addict. In fact, the mere thought of getting on the ‘puter as prelude before ever actually seeing an image at all, will biochemically trigger the sex addict and they are off to the proverbial brain-based pleasure center in the sky. Make no mistake, it is foreplay plain and simple. While the alcoholic can somehow put that glass back down (uh-huh), the sex addict is less lucky at least from a recovery perspective, since the split second their eyeballs hit the screen or just think of hitting the screen, they are gushing neurochemicals and altering their brain. Need I state of course that it is virtually unheard of (pun intended) for the sex addict to engage in net porn and not masterbate, large doses of an SSRI notwithstanding. But even if somehow they refrained, they are still triggered, still “using”, and are still “under the influence” of their altered brain chemistry. Of prime importance behaviorally speaking, is that in both scenarios the cardinal rules of recovery were breached. And that would be People, Places, and Things.

Let me be clear. If a sex addict is checking out pornography, that person is not sexally sober and sure as heck is not in recovery. They are “using”. Cheating or no cheating. No ifs ands or buts.

What happens next to the sex addict individual after perusing the porn sites – even for no more than a few seconds by the way – is that they are in an altered state. Meaning that the addict is now the equivalent of being stoned. And this individual will remain stoned for quite a period of time afterward. Which also means that the addict is walking around with these images in their head that they can (and oh so readily do) recall in a milli scintilla of a nanosecond( or less!), sometimes on purpose (to get even more stoned or to maintain the high) and the rest of the time because the images simply break through consciousness and pop up when least expected. That said, if you are sexually addicted and you engaged in porn, then you should expect that these images will be automatically recalled willy nilly. These images have been seared – and I mean seared – branded into the sex addicted brain and will offer a free high – a feeling of utter euphoria whenever recalled. And recalled they will be, time and time and time again.

I mentioned that sex is neurological. It is. Sexual arousal, just like any type of arousal, occurs when parts of the brain release arousal-producing neurochemicals. Only then does the body respond in kind. When the body responds you have gone from a neurochemically produced thought process to a physical behavior. The very reason sex addiction is a subset of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is precisely for this reason – because the addicted individual has incessant recurring thoughts of either sexual activity or objectification for the purpose of sexual arousal (mental or physical), which is in and of itself arousing and anxiety producing. When arousal and anxiety is produced it immediately triggers the need to reduce the anxiety which in the case of a sexual addiction, is accomplished by having sex. Needless to say, OCD is itself a subset of the group of disorders collectively referred to as anxiety disorders. And the process repeats itself, hence the recurring loop of thoughts and behaviors that seem to have a life of their own. It seems that way because in a sense, it is that way. Like most mental disorders, OCD is neurological in that it is a byproduct of your brain producing an overabundance of one neurochemical and not enough of another. That would be dopamine and seratonin. The later of which is why high doses of an SSRI (serotonin-based antidepressants) like Prozac is generally the drug therapy of choice for sex addiction. Even though it is classified as an antidepressant, the high doses of seratonin (for those that can tolerate it) cut both libido and performance, enabling the sex addict to have a better shot at sobriety.

So. Is fantasy and euphoric recall cheating? Maybe. But if you have a sexual addiction and you engage in sexual fantasy, you are not sober – you are under the influence. Call your sponsor, talk to your psychotherapist, call the folks on your fellowship list and hit a meeting. Because sexual fantasy which produces euphoric recall, is simply sex you are having in your head.

Posted in Addiction, Personal, Sex | Comments Off on Euphoric Recall Has Been A Major Party Of My Life

Intelligent people have ‘unnatural’ preferences and values that are novel in human evolution

REPORT:

More intelligent people are significantly more likely to exhibit social values and religious and political preferences that are novel to the human species in evolutionary history. Specifically, liberalism and atheism, and for men (but not women), preference for sexual exclusivity correlate with higher intelligence, a new study finds.
The study, published in the March 2010 issue of the peer-reviewed scientific journal Social Psychology Quarterly, advances a new theory to explain why people form particular preferences and values. The theory suggests that more intelligent people are more likely than less intelligent people to adopt evolutionarily novel preferences and values, but intelligence does not correlate with preferences and values that are old enough to have been shaped by evolution over millions of years.”
“Evolutionarily novel” preferences and values are those that humans are not biologically designed to have and our ancestors probably did not possess. In contrast, those that our ancestors had for millions of years are “evolutionarily familiar.”
“General intelligence, the ability to think and reason, endowed our ancestors with advantages in solving evolutionarily novel problems for which they did not have innate solutions,” says Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist at the London School of Economics and Political Science. “As a result, more intelligent people are more likely to recognize and understand such novel entities and situations than less intelligent people, and some of these entities and situations are preferences, values, and lifestyles.”
An earlier study by Kanazawa found that more intelligent individuals were more nocturnal, waking up and staying up later than less intelligent individuals. Because our ancestors lacked artificial light, they tended to wake up shortly before dawn and go to sleep shortly after dusk. Being nocturnal is evolutionarily novel.
In the current study, Kanazawa argues that humans are evolutionarily designed to be conservative, caring mostly about their family and friends, and being liberal, caring about an indefinite number of genetically unrelated strangers they never meet or interact with, is evolutionarily novel. So more intelligent children may be more likely to grow up to be liberals.
Data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) support Kanazawa’s hypothesis. Young adults who subjectively identify themselves as “very liberal” have an average IQ of 106 during adolescence while those who identify themselves as “very conservative” have an average IQ of 95 during adolescence.
Similarly, religion is a byproduct of humans’ tendency to perceive agency and intention as causes of events, to see “the hands of God” at work behind otherwise natural phenomena. “Humans are evolutionarily designed to be paranoid, and they believe in God because they are paranoid,” says Kanazawa. This innate bias toward paranoia served humans well when self-preservation and protection of their families and clans depended on extreme vigilance to all potential dangers. “So, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to go against their natural evolutionary tendency to believe in God, and they become atheists.”
Young adults who identify themselves as “not at all religious” have an average IQ of 103 during adolescence, while those who identify themselves as “very religious” have an average IQ of 97 during adolescence.
In addition, humans have always been mildly polygynous in evolutionary history. Men in polygynous marriages were not expected to be sexually exclusive to one mate, whereas men in monogamous marriages were. In sharp contrast, whether they are in a monogamous or polygynous marriage, women were always expected to be sexually exclusive to one mate. So being sexually exclusive is evolutionarily novel for men, but not for women. And the theory predicts that more intelligent men are more likely to value sexual exclusivity than less intelligent men, but general intelligence makes no difference for women’s value on sexual exclusivity. Kanazawa’s analysis of Add Health data supports these sex-specific predictions as well.
One intriguing but theoretically predicted finding of the study is that more intelligent people are no more or no less likely to value such evolutionarily familiar entities as marriage, family, children, and friends.

Posted in Conservatives, IQ, Liberal | Comments Off on Intelligent people have ‘unnatural’ preferences and values that are novel in human evolution

I Am A Jewish Chauvinist

My natural inclination is to think that Jews and all things Jewish are the best and that at all times and in all places they are superior to their non-Jewish alternatives.

I converted to Orthodox Judaism. I changed my whole life and identity to do this Jewish thing. My whole being is wrapped up in being Jewish. I naturally incline to seeing what’s awesome about my new identity and to denigrate those who are outside the tribe.

Unless I put myself in a philosophical frame of mind, unless I picture myself miles above the earth looking down on humanity with objectivity, I side with my group.

I expect members of other groups to be similarly chauvinistic. I remember that when I was an Anglo-Christian, I took for granted that we were God’s chosen people, that we were superior, that we created the most awesome countries.

Because I take this kind of chauvinism for granted, I find admirable people who are able to accurately criticize their own.

I don’t know exactly why I blog. It is probably some kind of compulsion. I blog about what I need to work out in my own mind.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on I Am A Jewish Chauvinist

HOMOSEXUALITY IN ORTHODOX JUDAISM

Rabbi Nachum Ansel writes: The Torah clearly states its views about the act of homosexuality. The act of homosexuality,
i.e. two men having sexual relations, is prohibited (SOURCE #1). The act is twice called a ìToaivaan abominationî and it is such a severe sin, that it merits the death penalty in a Jewish court system (SOURCE #2). If not for the fact that homosexuality is prevalent in Western Society today, there would be little controversy about this Torah sin. It is clearly forbidden and never condoned anywhere in the Torah.

The very context of the prohibition (SOURCE #1) shows the Torah view. It is couched between the prohibitions of child sacrifice (to an idol) and bestiality (sexual relations with an animal). In most countries today, these two acts are considered abhorrent and contrary to modern values. It is only because homosexuality is relatively widespread and condoned by many people, that it seems that the Torah is ìout of stepî with the real world. This is an important issue that has clear ramifications, and will be discussed below.

There is usually a fear by traditional Jews who are homosexuals to the ìtraditionalî response to homosexuality. There are some traditional parents who might sit Shiva upon hearing that their
child is a homosexual. This seems to reflect the classic Torah reaction. And yet, after the initial shock, many traditional parents often take a more sympathetic attitude toward homosexual children. How this reaction is possible by Halachik Jews, given the Torahsís straightforward attitude, will be amplified below…

The first Lubavicher Rebbe writes (SOURCE #17) that we can hate the sin, but also must continue to love the sinner. This is consistent with the normative Jewish view. Thus, while we may abhor the sin of homosexuality, we must continue to love the homosexual, not matter what his behavior and sin (see Leviticus 19:18). We do not and cannot reject people as Jews and as individuals because of a particular sin. Those who violate the Shabbat, for example, (also guilty of death in the Torah) are not thrown out of the Jewish community or denied the ability to pray in the synagogue. Similarly, homosexuals who have sinned with acts of homosexuality may not be thrown out of the Jewish community or shunned.

Since EVERYONE has committed some sin (Ecclesiastics 7:20), we would have to throw out everyone from a synagogue if we threw out all sinners (everyone gossips occasionally, a grave sin, or ìslipsî in practice). And since we do not judge which is a more and which is a less severe sin (Avot 2:1), all Jews are permitted to remain in the community, as long as they want to be Jews and part of the community. This idea is expressed in the Talmud (SOURCE #18) when it says that a Jew remains a Jew, even after he sins.

There are some Jewish homosexuals who desire to ìbe with their ownî and form ìgay congregationsî and communities exclusively for Jewish homosexuals. Is this permitted in Judaism? This is NOT the Jewish way. Each Jewish community should be made up of a diversity of Jews. The Hebrew word for community, , צבור is an acronym for three groups : -רשעים ,בינונום ,צדיקים righteous, ìmiddle of the roadersî and sinners. Thus, every Jewish community is made up of diverse
people of all moralities. This is also the symbolic concept of holding the Four Species together on Sukkot (each specie representing a different moral kind of Jew) and the words recited immediately prior to Kol Nidrei on Yom Kippur. The Mishna (SOURCE #19) specifically says not to separate from the general Jewish community…

The views of the three scholars below also reflect the ideas and concepts discussed above. Rabbi Shmuel Boteach has lectured to many non-Jewish and gay audiences and has also written about this subject at length. Rabbi Boteach agrees with all the concepts stated above (and some ideas expressed above were taken from his writings). He also states that homosexuality cannot be a deviance, since by definition sexual deviance is an oxymoron. Since sex is instinctive, an instinct cannot be deviant. God expressed a preference for heterosexuality and mandated that only this type
of sexual activity is permitted for human beings. Since the Torah has defined Western morality (and has preserved it for thousands of years), its viewpoint needs to be taken seriously.

Rabbi Aaron Feldman from Baltimore, a noted Rabbi in the Charedi camp, has recently come under some criticism for his views on this subject. Rabbi Feldman said that non-practicing homosexuals have an important role to contribute in Jewish life. He also said that a Jew is judged by his actions and not his orientation. Only actions are prohibited, not proclivities. Controlling behavior, though difficult, is what the Torah asks. Judaism looks negatively at homosexual activity, but not at the homosexual nature.

Dennis Prager has also written and spoken extensively on the Jewish view of homosexuality. Prager writes that Judaism does not look down on homosexual love. That is natural. Only homosexual intercourse is prohibited. In Judaism, Jews are simply sexual, and not classified by their sexual preference. The Torah has done more to civilize the world than any other book in history. It the Torah, then, makes a proclamation (against homosexuality), it should be taken seriously by the world. In this area, the Torah is not ambiguous as it is in many other areas, and modern values cannot be reconciled with the Torah, as it can in many other areas. Although it prohibits Melachacreative activity on Shabbat, the Torah does not make a moral statement about the Shabbat and its violation. But in regard to homosexuality, the Torah says it is a Toaiva-abomination, and thus expresses great repugnance. This is unambiguous.

Posted in Homosexuality, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on HOMOSEXUALITY IN ORTHODOX JUDAISM