July 17, 2015 WP: Black America has been playing by white America’s rules. If we want reconciliation, it’s time white America shared the burden. Luke Ford No sacred cows.

WP: Black America has been playing by white America’s rules. If we want reconciliation, it’s time white America shared the burden.

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Thank God for the Washington Post and their courageous non-stop efforts to give the hateful lily white monolith of pure evil the dressing down that it so rightly deserves. Without their brave efforts it will be impossible for every single white person in this country to confess their own guilt and accept the guilt of every white person that preceded them and beg for the severe punishment they so rightly deserve. Without this complete and total surrender of the evil ones we will never be able to achieve racial harmony in this country.

* At the risk of sounding racist (although I’m sure others have expressed this sentiment), “white America” works — “black America” doesn’t.
Perhaps “black America” ought to join what works rather than attempting to drag “white America” down to its level.

“Black America”, consisting of only about 14% of the population, is responsible for nearly HALF of all murders, and a large majority of violent crimes. “Black America” shuns English is favor of its own ignorant dialect that is rejected in all higher levels of society. “Black America” uses ONE HUNDRED-YEAR-OLD grievances as an excuse for wallowing in poverty and idleness when they have men like Dr. Ben Carson to look to as proof that the ghetto can be escaped if one works to do so.

* Hmm, last time I checked, hundreds of thousands of white Union soldiers DIED freeing blacks from slavery. Where are the reparations for their families?

* When foreigners come to the US (even the ones from Africa), they learn the rules, the language, the customs, start businesses, and a generation later, their kids are in the top Universities studying engineering or medicine. Perhaps it is time for black Americans to learn from these people, and that speaking good English, dressing well, doing well in school, and showing some respect to those willing to offer you a job is not “acting white.”

* This author’s article could have been even more compelling if he had shared a few heart wrenching stories about his childhood experiences of being a slave. Maybe even some of the vast number of lynchings he witnessed while at Harvard.

* Almost every one of these cases of a cop killing a young black person has a basis of the black refusing to obey the lawful orders of a cop, of resisting arrest, of fighting with the cop. Too often the cry is “Equal Justice” when the person being referred to didn’t obey the laws to start with.

* If a potential employer has an instinctive negative reaction to a job applicant with a “black sounding name,” the reason may be that the applicant’s name is associated with a group identified with high crime and educational underachievement. I suspect, if the interests of their business or family are involved, many of our black citizens may have a similar reaction to members of this group. From my perspective as a senior citizen, the “white” community has made much more progress towards agreeing that black citizens should have an equal opportunity for education and economic advancement (including a willingness to support programs that give blacks favored treatment I this regard) than our black community has made in showing that they are able to take advantage of these opportunities.

* So, since 1965 roughly $12.5T of “reparations” have been made by “White” Taxpayers that has been transferred to “Black” Americans (about half of all welfare transfers in the last 50 years, as estimated by the CBO). That does not seem to have done the trick.

* I posted a link to the 2006 shooting at a Louisiana church by a black man who murdered 4 parishioners, kidnapped his wife and murdered her. This story got little to no media or civil rights activist’s attention, why? It was a black-on-black crime.

Yet when some moron white kid does no differently, regardless of the intent (motive), the entire history of the Confederate States is blamed along with white racism.

* I’ve been around the block a few times, too. All my life, I’ve taken people as I find them. I’ve owned companies, hired and fired, but at no time that I know of have I made any decisions in my life based on racial or other prejudice. Among my friends are people of all races and life style persuasions.

As a former member of the military during the 60’s and 70’s, I lost track of the number of hours of racial sensitivity training I went through, the racial sensitivity texts I had as required reading during professional and leadership development. I’m like you — what I’ve tried to do in my life now seems to matter not at all. The problem is in my race, I’m told. I can’t do anything about that. I’m tired too. I’m done.

* Since white people treat Blacks so badly and we’re so evil and racist and according to you Blacks are non racist and so kind and forgiving, why can’t I take my (white) children to W st in Anacostia to show them my childhood home? Or my schools? Or all the places I’ve told them about from my childhood. We would be robbed, raped and probably murdered within moments of arriving. However you and your children could come to my neighborhood anytime without the slightest bit of discomfort. And BTW thanks for trashing a once lovely and safe neighborhood (Anacostia).

* The US is the only country in the world where a Harvard educated, presumably very financially comfortable individual can whine about the injustice of the very country that has provided him with those comforts. Yes, there are still problems such as in the criminal justice system, but compared to the era in which the author was raised, we are light years ahead. I worked for 26 years in the civil rights field and got along with most people regardless of race. This current constant airing of supposed grievances is really leading me to question the motivations of the people who make up the organized black lobby. By the way, there are many more whites killed by blacks than vice versa.

* This OpEd is racist and dishonest from top to bottom. And I have news for you slick, there is virtually universal hatred of whites among blacks. That’s why gangs of young blacks regularly go around targeting whites for assault, rape, and murder. Whites don’t do those kinds of things to blacks, regardless of your Hollywood inspired fantasies of racial abuse from whites. Blacks regularly blame whites for dysfunction in they own lives.

Reverse the races in this garbage tome, and it would read like some drivel off of a white supremacist web site.

* Welcome to the daily whiny WaPo article about how tough it is to be black in America. The President is black, the AG is black. 25% of Federal Government employees are black. Seems to me African Americans have gotten their share and then some.

Try living in a place where blacks are in charge if you think the USA is tough. Move to Haiti or anywhere in Africa.

Stop having babies you cannot support. Stop having babies out of wedlock. Spend your day at the library instead of smoking pot and drinking malt liquor. There comes a point at which blacks have to take responsibility for their own welfare – and this is it.

* There is no doubt that America has a long and sorry history of racism against black people.

But there is also no doubt that there is racism against black people in nearly every other country on earth, and that black Americans are the richest major black community in the world.

Every year, white Americans pay a large amount of taxes, and bear a substantial regulatory burder, to provide for black people, who receive a sizeable governmental transfer of wealth and substantial regulatory action in their favor. And there is significant black-on-white violent crime, significantly more common than the reverse. And over time, the governmental burden is growing, not shrinking, due to the birth rate differential. I would be careful about assuming that even greater expense to be born by white Americans and other Americans would be well-received. At some point, black Americans must accept that in this world, there is not perfect fairness, and that black Americans should try to make their own conditions better through their own actions, over which they have far more control, and which are far more important to their own success and well-being. 50 years after the ending of segregation, using other people’s imperfection or past failures as reasons for one’s own failure is not an acceptable excuse.

Posted in America, Blacks, Whites | Comments Off

Commenters Not Buying WP Analysis On Race & Housing

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Some of the choice comments:

* Everyone prefers to be around folks similar to themselves, it is just human nature. If people would just respect their neighbor and his or her stuff, this would NOT even be an issue…

* You can’t make people want to see their property values plunge and their lives put in jeopardy. People live where that stuff can be prevented.

* Imagine that. Some people are concerned about where they live. They are concerned about how houses are maintained, about the schools their kids go to, about safety, about feeling good about going home each night. I don’t think most people care so much about the race of their neighbors but more that those neighbors share and show similar feelings about the area they live in.

* Different cultures determine where a person will choose to live. European Americans usually choose to live out of high crime, failed cities by working hard, staying out of trouble. African Americans seem to want to stay in high crime, poverty areas in the cities. Different values, different cultures.

* We live in a very diverse community. No one decorates for any holiday. No flags for patriotic holidays, no indications of any religious holiday. Nothing. It’s grim. You may not notice something like this until it’s gone; then you start feeling a bit lonely. When we moved in, there was less diversity and much more color and an upbeat feeling.

* Renting is way different than buying real estate. Maybe people may take a chance on a cheaper apartment in a neighborhood that they wouldn’t at first have considered, but buying a house or condo is a different matter altogether. You are investing a lot of money and you want to ensure that the real estate prices either remain stable or increase (not go down). You want good schools and a safe neighborhood. And living a few blocks from a slum is not a good idea since the crime spills over.

* Honest question, why is “diversity” so valuable for a neighborhood anyway? I live in a really diverse neighborhood – Columbia Heights. Blacks, whites, hispanics, asians etc. projects next to penthouses, all living in relative disharmony. Never seen or heard of any white people mugging, assaulting, raping, and/or harassing anybody, vandalizing and/or stealing property etc. Conversely though, I’ve repeatedly seen, read about, and have been a victim of black crime for ten years.

So who exactly is benefiting from this diversity? I’m not, and as far as I can tell, black people in my ‘hood certainly don’t seem terribly welcoming or happy that I’m there.

* Of course blacks are more willing to move to places where predominantly whites live. Those places tend to, on the whole, be safer, have better schools, more well-kept, etc. It’s not a surprise people would like to live there. Those are neighborhoods viewed as where “good things can come from being there”.

Whites dont want to live in predominantly black neighborhoods because they tend to be poorer areas, worse schools, less safe, etc. And the perception tends to be (not incorrectly) that bad things tend to happen more in those neighborhoods than in predominantly white neighborhoods.

I’m a white female, 30’s, and I can tell you I would pretty much absolutely never be willing to move to a neighborhood that was predominantly black. Just wouldn’t feel safe or comfortable or like a place I’d ever feel like was “home”, in a way that a predominantly white neighborhood (or honestly, one with a fair mix of Asians) would.

* Who among us wishes to be forced to live where they do not want to live or to be forced to endure government-imposed and supported neighbors with whom they have absolutely nothing in common? I am white and did not inherit anything from my parents. I worked very hard to pay for my own college education and to be able to afford, in retirement, a place where I feel comfortable among people of similar backgrounds. I would never choose to live among people, white or black, whose crime rates, out-of-wedlock births, and drug use/dealing are high. Why is that so hard to understand? And why is it considered to be racist?

* If the word “crime” is used anywhere in this article, I missed it. Isn’t that the reason blacks often move into predominantly white neighborhoods but whites very seldom move into neighborhoods which are predominantly black?

Posted in Blacks, Race, Whites | Comments Off

WP: If it becomes possible to safely genetically increase babies’ IQ, it will become inevitable

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Eugene Volokh writes: Intelligence is, generally speaking, good, and more is, generally speaking, better. It’s better for the person in question. It’s better for society to have more intelligent people. It’s not the most important thing. But ask yourself: All else being equal, would you rather have your child have an IQ (for all the limitations of that measure) of 85, 100, 115 or 130?

So here’s how it will happen. Say the 83 percent poll results hold, even once safe genetic modification is available (it’s not clear they will, given that at this point they reflect a purely hypothetical question, but say they do), and Congress bans such modification. Or say there is worry — understandable when it comes to a new technology — that the modification won’t be safe and will cause the birth of children with various birth defects or other problems, so Congress bans it because of that.

Now it’s gone! No more of this awful technology. Except, wait: Say the Chinese don’t see things the way we do. Out come some number of babies with horrible birth defects (truly a tragedy, and as a purely ethical matter, possibly a reason against such experimentation; I’m just saying the ethics won’t matter much). And then things get worked out, and now the new generation of Chinese, or Japanese, or Russians becomes on average much smarter than the new generation of Americans. How long will American public opinion remain opposed to a technology that seems vital to national success, and perhaps even national independence?

Plus, of course, many of the rich will want the technology for their own children. They’re rich, so they can go overseas to get it (even if they don’t want to risk the domestic black market). Hard to stop that without some pretty intrusive monitoring, even if there was the will to try. Now the upper middle class will ask: Why are we being left behind? Even if there is an equality problem with having only the top 20 percent have access to this technology (or, soon enough, only the top 50 percent or top 80 percent, if the pattern of technologies becoming more affordable holds), the alternative is having only the top 1 percent have access to this technology.

Of course, one can imagine some genetic modifications that will face too much social opposition to overcome such competitive factors. Yes, it would be convenient to have four arms — but who wants a baby with four arms? But it’s not as though intelligence looks icky, or inherently comes with massive countervailing baggage. Indeed, there are actually people who are considerably more intelligent than average walking amongst us even today. By all accounts, they are often happy, and even occasionally socially tolerated.

Some genetic experiments might be dangerous or might be costly in various ways. (Double your child’s intelligence by doubling his head size!) But tweaking genes to basically copy known and successful genetic patterns should just yield intelligent people much like the intelligent people who seem to be pretty successful in the world today, at least once the (possibly tragic) initial kinks are worked out. As I understand it, the genetic component of high intelligence isn’t just a matter of one gene or a couple of genes. Still, whatever it is, we know it occurs in nature, and there seems to be no reason in principle why replicating even a complicated mix of genes will necessarily yield harmful side effects. Maybe that will no longer be so if we try to get extraordinarily high intelligence, beyond the highest well-functioning level we have found naturally occurring. But there are a lot of intelligence increases we can get up to that point.

There is of course also the possibility that intelligence increases, even if beneficial for individual human beings, will be so harmful for societies that all countries will cut off such modifications. For instance, maybe if a society provides such enhancement for 20 percent of the population, it won’t be able to resist providing it for 100 percent — and then maybe a society in which everyone is very smart will be a society in which certain jobs that need to get done will be frustrating for smart people, in ways that are socially damaging.

But one advantage of intelligence is that it can help solve problems like that. As the number of smart people markedly increases, so likely will the number of inventions, such as robotics, nanotechnology and the like. Indeed, since these inventions can spread worldwide, this will create a still further incentive for genetic intelligence increases throughout the world: Imagine what it will be like if America is committed to a no-enhancement policy, while other countries produce reject the policy, and thus produce more inventions that further reduce the market for relatively unintellectual labor.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off

High Hispanic Crime Rate

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Ann Coulter writes: Reason magazine boasts, for example, that El Paso, Texas, has a large Hispanic population and yet El Paso “is among the safest big cities in America.”

In fact, however, El Paso’s “safe city” ranking is based on an outdated FBI crime index that includes only eight crime categories, excluding such crimes as drunk driving, narcotics offenses and weapons violations. When the FBI’s more complete crime index is used, El Paso has a higher crime rate than the national average. . . .

The second main line of attack on the idea that immigrants are committing prodigious amounts of crime are the apocryphal “studies.”

The two researchers whose work is cited over and over again for the proposition that immigrants are less criminal than Americans are Alex Piquero, criminology professor at the University of Texas at Dallas, and Bianca Bersani, sociology professor at the University of Massachusetts, Boston.

I looked up some of these alleged studies this weekend. . . . It turns out that neither Piquero nor Bersani compared immigrant crime to “the overall population”—as the British Guardian recently claimed in an article purporting to prove Donald Trump wrong. Rather, they compare immigrants’ crime rate to the crime rate of America’s most criminally inclined subgroups.

Thus, for example, once you get past the paywall, you will find that Piquero and Bersani’s joint study, “Comparing Patterns and Predictors of Immigrant Offending Among a Sample of Adjudicated Youth,” used as its base group “adolescents who were found guilty of a serious offense.” . . . . Similarly, professor Bersani’s oft-cited, but never-read study, “An Examination of First and Second Generation Immigrant Offending Trajectories,” looked at a population group that included “an over-sample of Hispanic and African-American youth.”

Instead of immigrants who are less crime-prone than our native blacks and Hispanics, we were hoping for immigrants less criminal than our Norwegians.

Posted in Crime, Latino | Comments Off

Israeli Professor Suggests Rape Would Serve as ‘Terror Deterrent’

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Forward: (Haaretz) — “The only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped.” This assertion was made by Middle East scholar Dr. Mordechai Kedar of Bar-Ilan University on an Israel Radio program. “It sounds very bad, but that’s the Middle East,” added Kedar, of Bar-Ilan’s Department of Arabic.
The program “Hakol Diburim” (“It’s All Talk”) was broadcast on July 1, immediately after the discovery of the bodies of Gilad Shaar, Naftali Fraenkel and Eyal Yifrah, who were kidnapped and murdered in the West Bank. It dealt, among other things, with the question of how Hamas can be deterred.
“You have to understand the culture in which we live,” said Kedar. “The only thing that deters [Hamas leaders] is a threat to the connection between their heads and their shoulders.” When presenter Yossi Hadar asked if that “could filter down” the organization’s ranks, Kedar replied: “No, because lower down the considerations are entirely different. Terrorists like those who kidnapped the children and killed them — the only thing that deters them is if they know that their sister or their mother will be raped in the event that they are caught. What can you do, that’s the culture in which we live.”
When Hadar said, “We can’t take such steps, of course,” Kedar continued: “I’m not talking about what we should or shouldn’t do. I’m talking about the facts. The only thing that deters a suicide bomber is the knowledge that if he pulls the trigger or blows himself up, his sister will be raped. That’s all. That’s the only thing that will bring him back home, in order to preserve his sister’s honor.”
Kedar is also a research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan, and in the past also served as chairman of the Israel Academia Monitor organization, which is involved in “exposing extremist Israeli academics who exploit academic freedom in order to take steps to deny Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state.”

Posted in Rape, Terror | Comments Off

Another Muslim Bloodbath

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Speaking of minorities who are completely peaceful and non-violent, here is a fun anecdote about the sister of the 24-year-old who yesterday killed four marines in a totally-not-typical-of-Muslims spree-killing:

Another sister, Yasmeen, drew attention at Red Bank High School and the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga for proudly wearing a traditional Muslim headscarf in class and on the volleyball court.

Yasmeen told the Chattanooga Free Press in 2010 that some students harassed her but that she wasn’t afraid to confront people about their attitudes toward her religious beliefs. “I’m not afraid to go straight toward them and ask them, ‘Do you really know what Islam is?’ ” she said. “There’s this misconception that Islam is a violent religion. Muslims are actually peaceful.”

* That article made me sick. What it all amounts to is that we Americans kissed their asses, and though it was really super duper coolio that they willfully refused to assimilate to the country they chose to move to, and now we wonder why their son/brother murdered four Marines.

No, the real villains in this, as in so many other cases, are the racist Americans who looked at the behavior of this family and saw them for what they really are.

* Wow, Trump is the real deal on immigration, not a fake like Cruz and Walker:

Tweets by realDonaldTrump

I guess I was cynical enough to think he was a fake too, but there is no mistaking his all-in sincerity reading his twitter feed. The attacks on McCain are just plain delightful, and land with a hard thud, not snarky girl-slaps typical of twitter jokes.

He’s also #1 in the last two national GOP primary polls, 3 points ahead of Jeb in both of them.

He’s got a great and unique sense of self-parody: he likes his own basic persona, but has fun turning it up a few notches to an absurd exaggeration.

The press can call this humor “buffoonish” which seems to be their favorite word to describe him lately, but based on their college records Jeb, Rubio, and Walker seem to be near the bottom of the IQ range for presidential candidates in a long time, and are the real dullards inarticulately grasping at the establishment script. I’m really looking forward to the debates now, which I predict will be Trump-fests and push him 5 more points above Jeb.

* Luke: Anyone who commits terror against the West, we should act like the Russians and rape their women, kill their families and everyone they love.

* That was my hometown he visited yesterday in order to commiserate with the Federal prisoners lodged at the penitentiary there; he didn’t even take the time to sample the famous local cuisine in the form of massive onion burgers, or visit the sprawling, neon-lit Cheyenne-Arapaho casino just north of town, at the Concho Indian Reservation, within spitting distance of where I grew up. He just motorcaded straight to the prison grounds – only previously famous in American history as the origin of Harry Truman’s “the buck stops here” meme – and once the “documentary” requiring his presence was filmed skedaddled back out.

You were right: with no more elections to face, he’s reverting to unvarnished form. I mean, can you imagine any time in recent history where a sitting president of the United States would tour a Federal prison to make a “we need to go softer on crime” point? The question answers itself: nope, he’s just trolling us, now. And he has a cool helicopter in Marine One to chopper about whatever provincial landscape Air Force One deposits him in the middle of to do it in. He may, indeed, have a point about Federal drug laws being a bit onerous and prison sentences flowing from conviction of violating them over the top – but that’s not really why he was in El Reno, U.S.A., strolling the prison grounds yesterday. He was there to set the stage for massive pardons coming down the pike; yet another poke-in-the-eye to “Core Americans” whom he imagines were behind the Congressional promulgation of those laws during the Nixon-Reagan-Bush eras in the first place (or their parents).

I must confess, were I a Leftist I’d be delighted at this turn of events: every “conservative” president we’ve had in recent history has actually gotten quite liberal as his term(s) stretched late into the evening – they “grow.” For instance, Ronald Reagan signed into law amendments to the Fair Housing Act in 1988 that the 1966 Reagan would have thrown absolute conniption fits about. “Conservative” presidents tend to start worrying what history will do to their legacies late in their terms – and they know full well who holds that megaphone. So they “grow,” almost always with the urgent pleas of their Republican Party-honcho advisers at the time. Despite that “growth,” the Left still hates them, decades later – which is why the GOP’s reputation as the “Stupid Party” thrives intact.

Obama is a doctrinaire Leftist – and he knows who holds that megaphone, also. With no more elections to face, he’s scrambling to both (1) do what he always wanted to anyway, i.e, get busy being the “real” Obama just as you speculated he would all those years ago, and (2) rub the rubes faces in it while he’s at it. That’s why the White House was lit up with the Rainbow flag after five unelected liberal justices found hiding in the crevices of the Constitution some heretofore undiscovered “right” for two men playing house to get “married.”

One thing I wish Obama had done while he was in El Reno, U.S.A., is go downtown and look at the memorial to its namesake: Union general Jesse L. Reno. Oklahoma is a border state, largely settled by white Southerners after the territory was opened for our famed (or infamous: YMMV) land grabs. And yet, there was never the slightest impulse to degrade or impugn or tear down memorials to Union heroes in places like El Reno in the wake of total Southern Democrat/Dixiecrat rule in early Twentieth Century America, or any time after for that matter: a testament to how well the wounds of the Civil War finally healed, post-Reconstruction, thanks to sensible, honorable, truly humane outstretching of hands on both sides of the carnage that was that war.

Reconciliation meant you let the other guy celebrate his heroes, his symbols, his heroic battlefields in peace. I would have liked explain this to him – or had someone smarter than me explain it to him – for whatever good it would do.

Those days, of course, are long gone – thanks in large part to tens of millions of Social Justice Warriors who rightly see Obama as their titular ideological head. And while Jesse L. Reno’s statue will never see vandal’s paint splashed across it’s marble facade proclaiming “Core American’s Lives Matter,” on the other side of the divide they are literally digging Confederate general’s long laid to rest up in order to rub a huge segment of the SJW’s ideological enemies noses in the Right Side of History.

Ahhh, Orwell’s boot: stamping on human faces who deserve to have their faces stomped upon is such beguiling business, if you consider yourself on that mythical Right Side of History. I truly doubt pointing out to Obama whom is truly being “divisive” and “intolerant” in 2015 America while standing in front of Union General Jesse L. Reno’s memorial in the middle of the Reddest of Reddest states would do much good, after all. He’d just smile and say “so sue me” – which is why his freelance SJW minions love him. They should.

* I agree about the Trump tweets. When I see McCain, Graham, Rove, or any of those other useless hacks spewing their nonsense on TV I start shouting at the screen. Great to see Trump doing it publicly.

Some tweets:
–Governor Perry failed on the border. He should be forced to take an IQ test before being allowed to enter the GOP debate.

–Irrelevant clown @KarlRove sweats and shakes nervously on @FoxNews as he talks “bull” about me. Has zero cred. Made fool of himself in ’12.

–Jeb Bush will never secure our border or negotiate great trade deals for American workers. Jeb doesn’t see & can’t solve the problems.

Also, he reads and frequently mentions Ann Coulter:
–Thank you @AnnCoulter for your nice words. The U.S. is becoming a dumping ground for the world. Pols don’t get it. Make America Great Again!

Posted in Donald Trump, Islam | Comments Off

Googled, Gobbled, and Throttled

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

I suspect that advertisers for rational reasons don’t want their ads next to certain content.

Fred Reed writes:

My site, Fredoneverything.org, has, or had until a few minutes ago, several Google ads, which served to bring in a modest amount of money, perhaps $200 a month. Many sites carry Google ads to make beer change, and some depend on them. Recently (so far as I now) Google has begun censoring sites in a curious way. This raises non-trivial questions.

This morning I got the following email from Google AdSense, after which I removed the Google ad-code. I write this column. Google does not. Anyway:

Google AdSense: Action required to comply with AdSense program policies.
Hello,
This is a warning message to alert you that there is action required to bring your AdSense account into compliance with our AdSense program policies. We’ve provided additional details below, along with the actions to be taken on your part.
Affected website: fredoneverything.org
Example page where violation occurred:http://fredoneverything.org/a-grand-adventure-except-it-isnt/
Action required: Please make changes immediately to your site to follow AdSense program policies.
Current account status: Active
VIOLENCE: As stated in our program policies, AdSense publishers are not permitted to place Google ads on pages with violent content. This includes sites with content related to breaking bones, getting hit by trains or cars, or people receiving serious injuries. More information about this policy can be found in our help center (link). How to resolve:
If you received a notification in regard to page content, we request that you immediately remove Google ads from the violating pages. If you are unable to, or unsure of how to remove the ads from these pages, or would like to continue monetizing the page with Google ads, please modify or remove the violating content to meet our AdSense policies.
If you received a notification in regards to the way ads are implemented on your site, please make the necessary changes to your implementation.
You do not need to contact us if you make changes. Please be aware that if additional violations are accrued, ad serving may be disabled to the website listed above. You should immediately take time to review your pages with Google ads to ensure that they comply with our policies.…..
To reduce the likelihood of future warnings from us, we suggest that you review all your sites for compliance. Here are some useful resources you might be interested in.….
We thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
The Google AdSense Team

What should one make of this? To begin, I suspect that it is simply fraudulent. Much of the news involves violence: Princess Diana’s death, the Rodney King beating, the bombing of Gaza, the riots in Baltimore and Ferguson. So sites have ads removed for covering these?

If Fred On Everything dealt in gore-porn, in grotesque photos of dismembered bodies, Google’s behavior might make sense. However, in over 700 posts spanning more than a decade, FOE has one shocking photo, of a victim of American torture at Abu Ghraib.

The picture is there to make a legitimate political point, that the government of the United States was behaving barbarically, torturing prisoners and turning female soldiers into sadists in the mold of Ilsa Koch. This is a matter of importance to citizens in whose name this is done, and to the parents of soldiers. It is something that cannot be nicetized. Prettying it up would–not incidentally, I begin to suspect–serve only to hide the government’s behavior from the public.

Why did Google object to the picture? Was it just mindless automated political correctness? The tone of the writing in the email—it is prissy high-school prose—suggests a recent and censorious female graduate of one of our dismalized universities. So maybe only reflexive sophomorism is involved.

However, there is a pattern in the pulling of ads. In all three cases that I know of, the content of the sites has been of a sort objectionable to the government. Start with FOE, which has been highly critical of Washington’s wars and racial policies.

Earlier, Antiwar.com had its ads pulled by Google, again for posting a photo of an Abu Ghraib victim.

Hmmmm. The endless wars are important to Washington and fill a lot of rice bowls. The feds cannot be happy with an articulate site of large circulation that opposes military adventurism. Since Antiwar depends (I think) on contributions from angels and its readers to stay afloat, pulling ads plausibly seems an attempt to cripple it.

The third site to have ads pulled was American Renaissance, another political site. It opposes mass immigration from the Third World and the sorts of misbehavior by blacks that is reported daily on Drudge, Breitbart, Worldnet Daily News, and European papers.

It is here worth noting that American Renaissance, though invariably painted as a site of extremists, isn’t. For example, the explosive popularity of Donald Trump’s opposition to immigration attests to the very large numbers of Americans who agree with him, and thus with American Renaissance. AmRen is not the home of some fringe. It represents the views of a large number of people whose politics are not acceptable to the politically correct.

Now, it may be that Google with its huge numbers of clients does not really know that FOE exists (though I find this shocking). I’m lucky if I get as many as a combined couple of hundred thousand visitors a month on my home site, fredoneverything.org, plus sites that sometimes or always pick the column. (E.g., The Unz Review and Lew Rockwell.) Maybe the thought-management department at Google has fallen into the hands of huffy and marginally literate Berkeley girls, and one of them stumbled cross FOE and didn’t like it. This happens.

But AntiWar.com is another thing. It is a big site, and enough noise was made over the pulling of its ads that higher-ups a Google must have known about it. Further, AntiWar never says anything about the usual forbidden categories of race, feminism, homosexuality, and such. Since I cannot readily imagine that Larry Page and Sergey Brin would on their own want to protect the endless wars, it is perhaps not unreasonable to suspect Washington’s hand. Companies like Google become de de fact quasi-governmental entities. Google’s policies look an awful lot like political censorship disguised as protecting the public from disturbing photos.

COMMENTS TO FRED:

* Julian Assange, after meeting with Eric Schmidt who for some reasons later made clear wanted to visit him, came to the conclusions (which were so well documented that Newsweek published his expose) that there’s a revolving door between high level State Department positions and Google perches, and that there are tight mutual political interactions with Hilary Clinton as well. Google chieftains openly cooperated in and suggested themselves modifying content to further State’s agenda.

* GOOGLE—THE WORLD’S NEXT BIGGEST ISRAELI POLICEMAN.

Thanks for the interesting article, Fred. This is very unfortunate, because I see ads on really terrible filthy websites where people use foul language and there is a lot of nudity and other inappropriate content, but to target your site and Amren, is clearly politically motivated.

However, before Google, there were other search engines, and doing fine. Then suddenly, 2 Jewish kids started a small company Google, and, in no time, it becomes #1 and toppled the giants of the industry, such as bing and yahoo and other search engines (older, more established ones).

And then there was myspace, very popular. Then a Jewish kids stole some ideas and started facebook. Suddenly, facebook becomes #1, and myspace is or almost bankrupt.

What is the explanation?

How are Judaists able to enter a well established field, and take it over in no time?

I suspect they are people in power who work with them to bring them into power, make them #1 and dismantle the opposition.

Judaists work together as a team. They have a very strong sense of shared identity and paranoia towards outsiders, the goyim. The Oligarchs probably met and decided they wanted Judaists to control search results, not goyim. So they financed Google, the Jewish media promoted it, the Jewish regulators blessed it and, in no time, the Judaists were telling us search results.

The reason they probably wanted to monopolize search engines and social media is not just for money, but more to control the goyim.

Google knows all the websites the Judaists do not like (such as patriotic websites or anti-Israel websites) from its database and can effectively shut down all of them, by removing them from its search results.

I suspect it will do that after other search engines have been bankrupted out of existence. Once Google is the only search engine in town, there will be a total black out of all patriotic and conservative websites or those who dare speak against Israel. A police state on the Internet is coming with Google in charge.

Solution? Start building databases of websites and we must work with other countries which are free from Israeli influence, such as China, Russia, Iran, to develop search engines run on their servers. A meta search engine, which searches multiple search engines located in different countries, might be the way to go.

* Google purchased youtube and started censoring videos critical of Israel or Judaists.

For example, Youtube allowed ISIS videos showing beheadings, but when a pastor posted a video simply talking about killing of Christians in the Middle East, youtube banned it:

(Bill O’ Reilly does not understand why youtube would do that. This is because the Judaists hate Christians the most, more than Muslims, or any other religious group, and try to use Muslims to subjugate and oppress Christians and keep them down).

“Many Jews therefore view enthusiastic Christian believers—no matter how reliably they support Israel and American Jews—as enemies by definition,” – Michael Medved, 2009.

So Reverend Kapner started hosting his own videos and others started new video hosting sites, such as trutube.tv. The same ideas can be used to deal with Google’s censorship in other areas.

* Evil is usually committed by well manicured and impeccably educated men in air conditioned offices, speaking in soft tones. That pretty much defines Google or your average Capitol Hill drone.

I don’t trust Google given the fact that principals of Google are allowed to park their private 747 at a military base and use it’s facilities. You don’t get that perk without doing some serious favors for uncle Sam.

I don’t trust Google because of the back doors it inserts in it’s code for Android and it’s open admission that it reads gmail and routinely tries to steal other companies IP.

I don’t trust Google because of their collusion with the USG in monitoring the internet on the behalf of the NSA, so they don’t have to get their hands dirty.

* Yet Google promotes the racist anti-white website Salon. Many of the essays published daily in Salon violate Google’s own corporate policies regarding race, gender, and providing a safe place to work for its diverse staff.

* It was an open secret that Google (as well as other high tech companies such as Facebook) played a big role in fashioning Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign. I know because I read about it in various MSM articles. It is also no secret that many Obama administration officials go to work for Google and Facebook upon leaving government service. So there is a revolving door of sorts. One reason for Google to play so closely with the Obama administration is concern over application of the federal antitrust laws against Google. They saw what that did to IBM in the late 60′s and Microsoft in the late 90′s (both cases brought by Democratic Administrations and ultimately settled under Republican Administrations). See [link.] Add to that concern the vast expansion of the surveillance state after 9/11, and you may be able to understand Google’s actions.

Posted in Google, Jews | Comments Off

The Tranny Army

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Associated Press has learned that Pentagon leaders are finalizing plans aimed at lifting the ban on transgender individuals serving in the military.
Senior U.S. officials say an announcement is expected this week. They say the military would have six months to determine the impact and work out details, with the presumption that they would end one of the last gender- or sexuality-based barriers to military service.
The officials say that during the transition, transgender individuals would still not be able to join the military. Decisions to force out those already serving would have to be referred to a top Defense Department leader.
Several officials familiar with the planning spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the issue before the details have been worked out.

Posted in Trans | Comments Off

Gawker Lost Its Balls In The Face Of A Gay Onslaught

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

We gotta stop shaming leading executives of media companies who hire porn star escorts.

If only Gawker realized that gays were the most persecuted group ever in human history and have the most victim pokemon points, then surely they would not have made this mistake.

Don’t journalists know by now that you can’t publish anything negative about gays and Jews and certainly not about gay Jews!

Hollywood Reporter: Gawker has pulled its controversial story about Condé Nast CFO David Geithner allegedly soliciting a gay escort.

Gawker managing editor Nick Denton released the following statement: “Yesterday evening, Gawker.com published a story about the CFO of Conde Nast texting an escort. It was an editorial call, a close call around which there were more internal disagreements than usual. And it is a decision I regret … The point of this story was not in my view sufficient to offset the embarrassment to the subject and his family.”

“It is the first time we have removed a significant news story for any reason other than factual error or legal settlement,” Denton wrote.

Shortly after the story posted, Gawker editor-in-chief Max Read defended it, writing on Twitter, “Given the chance Gawker will always report on married c-suite executives of major media companies f—ing around on their wives.”

Read also reportedly told a journalist via email, “A high-level executive at a powerful media organization f—ed around on his wife and attempted to trade favors to kill the story. If you don’t see how that’s a news story, I don’t know what to tell you.”

The story, written by Gawker’s Jordan Sargent, detailed an rendezvous allegedly planned between a male escort and Geithner and was widely criticized as excessively invasive journalism.

Michael Barbaro of the New York Times called it “repugnant, shameful.”

Posted in Gawker, Homosexuality, Journalism | Comments Off

I Luv Dem Sistas!

Posted on July 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Just had three black chix (one is majoring in computer science, one is latin) fussing over me at the physical therapist’s office, Jew heaven, luv dem sistas. Sometimes even a Torah Jew blogger needs a little attention for his aching digits and numb thumbs and stiff wrists.

Susan Williams: Well glad it was physical

Miriam Lilian D Or: They gave him therapy that was very physical.

I can imagine Luke fathering children from every race. To see a little Ethiopian Luke, a little Korean Luke, little Guatemalan, Native American, Swedish, Pakistani Luke, I mean a part from his legitimate Jewish children. It would be so cute. It’s A Luke World After All.

Luke: Shuffling through my credit cards at the office, I gave one with the most room to the secretary and she said, “Let’s see if this one works.”

My skin is white but my credit score is black.

How effectively do English-language swear words translate into Hebrew? I spent $208 on physical therapy for my hands and wrists today and then jammed my thumb trying to help a clueless ungrateful woman waddle through a door.

Posted in Blacks, Personal | Comments Off