British Jewish Leaders Unite Behind Subsidizing Illegal Immigration

There’s not a word in the following article about Israel. Apparently, it is fine with the Jewish elites of Britain for the Jewish state to act in its self-interest by not taking in Islamic migrants who hate it. Apparently, it is fine for Jews to act in their group interest. Apparently, these Jewish leaders of Britain think it is just fine to support the import of millions of Muslims who want to destroy Europe and murder a ton of Jews along the way.

I wonder how many of these Jewish leaders of Britain plan to house Islamic migrants in their own homes? How do you think that would work out?

These Jewish leaders prescribe the opposite for the goyim (diversity) what they seek for Jews (cohesion).

The more you subsidize something, the more you get of it. So these Jewish leaders are subsidizing illegal immigration.

From The Jewish Chronicle of London:

Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis has pledged his support for the appeal saying Jews have a responsibility to respond to the humanitarian crisis.
He said: “Our heritage must inform the way that we respond. This is a deep and tragic humanitarian emergency.”
He urged the Jewish community to provide a “compassionate response at this great time of need.”
Rabbi Mirvis discussed the refugee crisis with Pope Francis at a private audience in the Vatican last week, describing it as “a profound challenge”.
Reform Judaism’s senior rabbi, Laura Janner-Klausner called on the community to support the WJR appeal.
She said: “When we look across at Calais and beyond, we see ourselves. I believe future generations will judge Britain against its response to today’s crisis.”
Rabbi Jonathan Wittenberg, senior rabbi of Masorti Judaism said: “We see with horror the pictures of the drowned, the hungry and the exhausted, and remember that only a generation ago our parents were refugees, desperate for somewhere to let them in and allow them to live.
“The question is therefore simply: ‘What can I do to help?’ Directed by the knowledge and skills of World Jewish Relief, we must respond with all the compassion, energy and generosity we can.”
Senior rabbi and chief executive of Liberal Judaism, Danny Rich, said: “World Jewish Relief will lead the immediate response of the Jewish community and I trust, using our unique experience, the community will follow through.”
Jews in Manchester were being directed to support the appeal by the community’s representative council.
Edie Friedman, director of JCORE, said it was important that British Jewry was seen to respond collectively to the crisis. She said: “It is hard to know what to do and, as a community, we want to do what is the most helpful, which is why we want a co-ordinated response.
“People know they can support the appeal and that will help internationally and then we will work out how we can best help refugees once in the UK.
“We don’t just want to accept these people – it is important they get the support they need to be here.”
She added that the community could have responded quicker to the problem: “JCORE have been warning about the crisis for some time. There is no easy answer but, as a community, those images should resonate with us.”
Finchley Progressive Synagogue’s Rabbi Rebecca Qassim Birk is leading a local Citizens UK campaign to get 50 Syrian refugees resettled in Barnet.
The interfaith group includes Rwandan, Syrian, Jewish and Catholic communities in Barnet who are organising homes, school places and doctors’ surgeries to support the refugees ahead of their arrival.
As part of the scheme, four Jewish landlords have offered to house refugees, 32 GP surgeries have offered to register refugees and five schools have committed to giving places to Syrian children.
Both Masorti and Reform movements held meetings on Monday. Nic Shlagman, community projects co-ordinator for West London Synagogue, told Reform members about the success of the synagogue’s drop-in centre for refugees. He said: “If anyone wants advice or help on how to set up their own one in their shul we can help with that.
“In the short-term, the camp in Calais still needs warm clothing for men, tents and sleeping bags. They also need people to help build shelters. We are co-ordinating a van of volunteers to go and help with that.”
Chief Rabbi Lord Sacks led calls for Britain to respond to the refugee crisis with a humanitarian gesture similar to the Kindertransport.
He said that Britain needed to take a more generous approach to accepting refugees.
Speaking on BBC2’s Newsnight programme, Lord Sacks said: “Some of the images we have seen in the last few days have brought back images that we thought we would never see again.
“They take our mind way back to the Holocaust and it is important to remember simple humanitarian gestures like the Kindertransport, which rescued 10,000 children in Germany.
“It was only 10,000 out of six million, but it lit a light in the darkest period of history.”
Former foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind said he was concerned that refuges were risking their lives trying to reach northern Europe having already arrived in a place of relative safety in Turkey.
The former Conservative MP, who is Jewish, said: “From a humanitarian point of view, I don’t blame anyone for wanting to seek out a better life in the north of Europe. But, from an asylum point of view, if you are in Turkey already you are not in danger, they are not going to lose their lives if they are in Turkey or Jordan.”
He added: “I have no doubt that we should be taking more people. It’s not just a problem for the UK. When you go back to the Second World War and the refugee crisis there, it involved large numbers of people going to Canada, Australia and the United States.
“We should be expecting other developed countries to be playing ball and there has been very little discussion around that.”
Speaking at the Holocaust Educational Trust annual dinner on Monday, Business Secretary Sajid Javid said: “Anyone who fled murderous extremism 75 years ago will find the refugee crisis we face today depressingly familiar.”
He added that it was “incumbent upon those of us who are more fortunate, to offer such men, women and children the safe haven they desperately need and they truly deserve.
“If we look the other way; if we say it’s nothing to do with us; if we say a refugee’s not welcome here because of his or her religion; then we are no better than those who tried to bar the door against Jewish refugees two generations ago.”
Labour MP Luciana Berger criticised the Prime Minister’s pledge to take in 20,000 refugees and said it lacked “ambition”.
Britain’s youngest Jewish MP attacked the slow response of the government and said, “it has done too little and taken too long to respond to this crisis”.
Ms Berger said: “It has failed to live up to Britain’s historic role as a country that offers asylum to those fleeing persecution and death.
“It has also failed to provide the leadership needed to help co-ordinate our response with other European nations.”

Posted in England, Immigration, Islam, Israel, Jews, Syria, Whites | Comments Off on British Jewish Leaders Unite Behind Subsidizing Illegal Immigration

Rabbi David Wolpe: The U.S. Has a Moral Obligation to Help Syrian Refugees

Rabbi David Wolpe writes:

Indifference is a betrayal of America’s founding mission

Moral clarity is important because moral decisions are often difficult. The easy choices that pose no risk—one should contribute to charity, help old people across the street, and be kind to children—these are not moral dilemmas. Today, with an estimated 4 million Syrian refugees streaming across the globe, we see a genuine moral crisis in the capitals of the West.

What makes this a moral dilemma is not only a claim on resources. It is also the lurking suspicion that we might be admitting people who, arriving from a region where terrorism and anti-Western feeling is rife, will end up causing harm…

But America was founded on the ideal of refuge. Indifference is a betrayal of its founding mission. The words on the Statue of Liberty cannot be an empty promise if we are to remain the great nation we have been for close to 250 years.

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me.

We cannot take everyone. We have to exercise caution when refugees arrive from a region that breeds anti-Western terrorists. But we remain that shining city on a hill. We must not close our arms to the world, or to the family on a raft, tempest-tossed, praying for safety. No country can afford to be all things to all people. Equally, this country cannot afford not to be America.

How many Islamic refugees would Rabbi Wolpe like on his block?

It’s a bad idea for Jewish elites such as Rabbi Wolpe to pervert the American idea to their own ends, claiming the mantle of Torah and of “universal moral values,” which can then be tossed aside whenever they’re inconvenient, such as in the application of these multi-cultural ideas to the Jewish state, which understandably does not want to import Islamic migrants who hate it (nor should any sane nation want such people).

No nation wants the world’s refuse.

As Benjamin Ginsberg wrote:

This historic background and the continuing relationship between Jews and the national government help explain one of the most notable characteristics of Jews in American politics: their strong adherence to liberalism, and especially to the Democratic Party, as loyal voters, leading activists, and major financial contributors. Geoffrey Brahm Levey has ascribed Jewish liberalism to the inherently humanistic character of Jewish values and traditions. This explanation seems somewhat fanciful, however, since in some political settings Jews have managed to overcome their humanistic scruples enough to organize and operate rather ruthless agencies of coercion and terror such as the infamous Soviet-era NKVD. (p. 14)

Posted in America, Immigration, Whites | Comments Off on Rabbi David Wolpe: The U.S. Has a Moral Obligation to Help Syrian Refugees

Rewarding Illegal Immigrants Destroys Host Countries

When Jewish organizations subsidize illegal immigrants to Europe and America, they are destroying Europe and America.

Notice how these organizations are not pushing for the destruction of the Jewish state with Muslims who hate it, but they assist in the destruction of Europe by showering aid on Islamic illegal immigrants.

Jerusalem Post: The refugee crisis has splashed across headlines in recent weeks as European governments are scrambling to deal with an influx of people arriving on their borders. A dialogue has also been triggered in the global Jewish community about what it can do to help, particularly in light of its own history as refugees seeking asylum from anti-Semitism. The Jerusalem Post reached out to Jewish aid organizations across the globe to find out what role they are playing to help refugees from Syria and the region.

Posted in Immigration, Islam, Jews | Comments Off on Rewarding Illegal Immigrants Destroys Host Countries

The Pain Of The Watermelon Joke

From the New York Times, a black woman writes:

But by the time I was 11 years old, even the smell of watermelon was enough to send me running to the bathroom with my most recent meal returning to my throat. It seemed I had grown violently allergic to the fruit.

I was a brown girl growing up in the United States. By that point in my life, I had seen the racist representations associated with African-Americans and watermelons, heard the terrifying stories of black men being lynched with watermelons hanging around them, watched black migrants from the South try to eke out a living in the big city by driving through neighborhoods like my own — Bushwick, in Brooklyn — with trucks loaded down with the fruit.

In a book I found at the library, a camp song about a watermelon vine was illustrated with caricatures of sleepy-looking black people sitting by trees, grinning and eating watermelon. Slowly, the hideousness of the stereotype began to sink in. In the eyes of those who told and repeated the jokes, we were shuffling, googly-eyed and lesser than.

Perhaps my allergy was actually a deep physical revulsion that came from the psychological impression and weight of the association. Whatever it was, I could no longer eat watermelon.

Comments to NYT:

* Clearly a demon she wrestles with. We don’t pick our demons; they seem to pick us. I am less curious about why she wrote this piece and more about why the Times chose to run it. What discourse does it advance? Misconceptions about whom we let in to our circle of friendship where familiarity pricks the balloons of sensitivity or self importance generally come up when we realize that some things still sting. Ms Woodson does her friend the disservice of lack of honesty at the outset or lack of loyalty at the end of this story. I feel more sorry for her dilemma than for her story.

* I’m a non-white immigrant who has been in this country for most of my life. There are many like me who are tired of this incessant emphasis of the NYT on all things black and racist. Authors (such as this one in the article) who write about this are published and lauded, movies about this are praised, and incidents involving this are blown out of all proportion. The current perception is that if it does not have a race angle, it won’t appear in the NYT. The liberal white guilt is nauseating. There are many other facets to America and American history, and we need to go forward as one people in a society where race does not matter, but culture does.

* It’s pretty clear we need a law that stops all remarks with any ethnic content that could offend or displease anyone — no more Scottish jokes, Irish jokes, cowboy jokes, etc. This would probably be illegal:
“And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or …”

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on The Pain Of The Watermelon Joke

High Trust Vs Low Trust Societies

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Hungary has been fighting Muslim invasions for over 500 years. Hungary has experienced the conflict and eventual collapse of three multicultural empires, the Ottoman Empire, Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Soviet Empire. The EU is likely Hungary’s fourth bite at the apple of being in a multi-cultural empire.

Hungary is also a lower trust, more diverse society, which likely knows the precarious status of civil society. Iceland is high trust and homogenous without much experience with diversity or civil strife.

* The majority of union workers in the US now are employed by various government bureaucracies. Mass migration now may actually expand job opportunities for union workers in public sector bureaucracies relating to welfare, immigration and law enforcement. Mass immigration is no longer viewed as competition, but an aggregate demand stimulus for government expansion.

* The problem (in Hungary and Romania if not in Finland) is that a lot of people seemed to equate “Bolshevik” with “Jewish”. While there certainly were Jewish Bolsheviks, especially in the early days, not all Bolsheviks were Jews nor (by far) were all Jews Bolsheviks. A lot of Hungarian Jews identified very strongly as Hungarian patriots. Stalin himself was no Jew lover in his later years. But a lot of locals took the war against Bolshevism as a license to oppress their local Jewish population. Not only were hundreds of thousands shipped off to be gassed at Auschwitz with the cooperation of the local authorities, but many of the local Jewish men (while not trusted to serve in the military itself) were conscripted as forced labor to dig trenches, etc. on the Eastern front lines where they were treated very poorly.

What happened to Hungarian Olympic fencer Attila (note the super patriotic Hungarian name) Petschauer was unfortunately all too illustrative.

These atrocities were committed by the Hungarians themselves without needing any encouragement from the Germans.

I don’t envy the position of the nations of central Europe in the 40′s – caught between the devil of Hitler and the deep blue sea of Stalin. They really had no good choices. But I’m not sure taking it out on the local Jewish population was really the right move.

* The Bela Kun thing probably didn’t help. But there might have been other things that made the locals dislike the Jews. The Spanish felt the Jews collaborated with the Moors, the Ukrainians thought they had helped the Poles oppress them, and the Greeks thought they had helped the Turks collect the child tax. I don’t know much about Hungarian history, but there are probably grievances the locals have.

This is the problem you have when a group remains separate from the society at large. Whether the separate group is Jewish or some other ethnic group like Germans, if they are perceived as separate from the main group and of helping other groups oppress the main group, then they will be a target.

* There were a lot of reasons for “East Europeans” to be allied with Nazi Germany, and, for that matter, for a lot Europeans to support Nazism, without at the same time supporting the persecution and murder of Jews.

The fascist Arrow Cross of Hungary was responsible for a certain number of Jewish deaths, and perhaps also Rumania but I think Finland was largely guiltless, as far as the Holocaust goes. But before we even begin to blame things on Finland, let’s not forget that Stalin declared war on them first.

* The Jewish connection was not only with Bolsheviks. If you were a leftist, or a fascist with a social bent in favor of nativist worker’s rights (like Codreanu’s Iron Legion, which I have recently learned has an oddly large Internet fan base abroad), then you were also against exploitative capitalism. Jews figured prominently there as well. It all comes down to power and the Other.

* The megaphone is turned on when the Hungarian Jobbik camerawoman is filmed (and fired for) tripping the old man carrying a child, but the megaphone is turned off when, just moments before, the same woman was (on film) almost knocked over herself by waves of charging immigrants, who were charging past police containment lines (and therefore, in essence, breaking the law.) Hers was a futile attempt to aid the police in stopping those migrants who were escaping. Nothing more. But there was a little kid crying over his fall, and that’s all that matters.

* I am not sure why German companies don’t realize that their reputation for quality comes from their German workers. Replacing German for Syrian or Turkish quality will do the same for their reputation and profits as the crappy quality US auto makers were known for did for theirs.

* My new tactic when discussing race/migration/invasion with SJW types: I declare myself as racist and call them such also. I point out that like me) they live in predominantly white and protected neighborhoods, 2) and have close to zero black/brown “friends” on their Facebook feed, etc…If I consider myself racist by such markers then there is no reason they should not be considered racist also.

Now, I have no idea whether these SJWs do live in protected white areas or whether or not they have any colored Facebook “friends”, no matter. To a man and woman they all become flustered, defensive and are at a loss for words. They stammer on that such markers are not determinative, etc. I insist that they are. Being objectively assessed as racist breaks their tender hearts. Everytime I use this tactic it has a satisfying effect. Make the SJWs eat their “personal is political” mantra till they choke on it.

MORE COMMENTS:

* The bizarre thing about Juncker’s position in all this is that he sees it as perfectly natural and morally acceptable for foreigners to fight to enter another nation to reach safety but morally wrong for the inhabitants of that nation to resist the influx to preserve their safety and way of life.

Given that Muslims have a demonstrated record of violence and intolerance in Europe the balance between the two competing interests has to favor the people of Europe in blocking the influx of foreigners especially as there are alternatives such as camps in Turkey, Jordan or even in Greece, which could use the money and jobs involved in holding these people if the EU would pay for it.

* In any other age, a large group of males between the ages of 18 and 40 crossing a border into a foreign country would be rightly considered an army on campaign – an invasion. Why is it any different now?

Posted in Diversity, Immigration | Comments Off on High Trust Vs Low Trust Societies

Replication Failure In Psychological Research

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I have long wondered whether psychologists’ ideological refusal to recognize group differences undermined the bulk of these studies. They rarely identify the race or ethnicity of subjects and blindly assume that these factors would not have any effect on the outcome. It seems very unlikely. The replication failure may be linked to this, at least on some significant level.

* I think two other major factors are affecting the reproducibility of psychology studies, and social sciences studies generally. First, there’s an enmeshment between popular outlets that publicize these studies’ results, and the scientists who perform the studies. The scientists want the publicity of having their study referenced in some magazine, and the magazine writers love having the veneer of Science fronting for their biases. This puts pressure on the research to find “interesting” results, rather than particularly honest ones – and this is especially true if the study can be related to political alignments, however spuriously (see e.g. “Conservatives scare easily”). The second factor is the biases of the scientists themselves. It’s been repeatedly shown that social science peer groups have remarkably similar worldviews. This of course pushes results away from the unfettered truth, toward an ideologically preferable one. There is research about this that has been published, particularly by Haidt et al. Although who knows if it will prove reproducible.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on Replication Failure In Psychological Research

No Evidence of Racial Discrimination in Criminal Justice Processing

Abstract: One of the most consistent findings in the criminological literature is that African American males are arrested, convicted, and incarcerated at rates that far exceed those of any other racial or ethnic group. This racial disparity is frequently interpreted as evidence that the criminal justice system is racist and biased against African American males. Much of the existing literature purportedly supporting this interpretation, however, fails to estimate properly specified statistical models that control for a range of individual-level factors. The current study was designed to address this shortcoming by analyzing a sample of African American and White males drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Analysis of these data revealed that African American males are significantly more likely to be arrested and incarcerated when compared to White males. This racial disparity, however, was completely accounted for after including covariates for self-reported lifetime violence and IQ. Implications of this study are discussed and avenues for future research are offered.

Posted in Blacks, Crime, IQ, Race | Comments Off on No Evidence of Racial Discrimination in Criminal Justice Processing

Islam Is Not A Good Fit For America & Europe

John Derbyshire says: Mention of Razib Khan brings us to Islam, the religion of Razib’s ancestors. In fact, if I remember right, Razib’s grandfather was an Imam, and Razib himself got part of his education in a Madrassah.

I’ve stated Radio Derb’s position on Islam before, and I’ll state it again now. We have nothing against Islam. It seems like a fine religion that’s given spiritual support and consolation to millions of people across hundreds of years. Jolly good luck to Islam.

The evidence is plain, however, that Islam is not a good guest in non-Islamic countries. A wise country that is not Islamic in its culture and traditions will not permit mass settlement by Muslims. It’s just asking for trouble.

Muslims have plenty of countries of their own. Plenty — 57 listed on the website of the
Organization of Islamic Cooperation, from Afghanistan to Yemen. Forty-nine of those countries have Muslim majorities. Any Muslim who wants to move to another country is spoiled for choice. Any Western nation that allows mass settlement by Muslims is being very foolish, given the trouble caused by a fanatical minority of Muslims. 9/11 should have made that point beyond dispute.

It didn’t, of course, and Western nations, I think without exception, continue in the gross folly of permitting mass settlement by Muslims.

On Monday this week Daniel Horowitz at Conservative Review wrote about the breathtaking scale of that folly in the particular case of the U.S.A. Using statistics from the Department of Homeland Security [laugh] Horowitz shows that the pace of immigration from Muslim countries has doubled since 9/11. From 2001 to 2013 more than 1.6 million people from predominantly Muslim countries were issued green cards for permanent settlement in the U.S.A.

Heading the list of nations there: Pakistan, which has settled over 200,000 people here since 9/11; Iran, 167 thousand; Nigeria and Bangladesh, 150 thousand each …

One point six million. As Horowitz says, if only ten percent are jihadists, that’s 160,000 jihadists. If only one percent are, that’s still sixteen thousand.

True, not every immigrant from a Muslim-majority nation is a Muslim. Still, not every immigrant from a non-Muslim nation is a non-Muslim, either. Some proportion of immigrants from Britain, France, and India are Muslims. So that’s a wash.

As Horowitz also said, this is just the numbers for green cards issued — immigrant-status visas. Huge numbers of non-immigrant visas have also been issued. Student visas, for example. Saudi Arabia
alone
was granted 54,000 student visas during the 2013/14 academic year. That’s almost a thousand percent increase since 9/11. A thousand percent! Eleven times as many as when Saudi nationals flew planes into the World Trade Center!

This is sheer insanity. We gain nothing from the mass immigration of Muslims — nothing but danger for our citizens, and an increase in surveillance by our security agencies, with corresponding de-crease in our liberties. Our immigration policy is nuts. It’s crazy. Quote
from Daniel Horowitz, quote:

Who voted for these policies? When did the American people ever have the opportunity to give input through a transparent process to the radical transformation of America? How many Americans would have supported a decision post-9/11 to roughly double the rate of Islamic immigration?

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on Islam Is Not A Good Fit For America & Europe

Stereotyping While Waiting In Line At Ralphs

It was a mess at Ralphs this afternoon. As I waited in line, I noticed patterns.

WASPs are the best behaved group. They are the best at waiting in line and they are the best, in general, in acting like good citizens. They create the best countries (think England, Canada, USA, Australia and New Zealand).

Bad Behavior Index

Blacks 106
Mexicans 85
American Indians 85
Italians 70
Irish 67
Jews 64
Germans 56
English/Welsh 47

Low IQ people are a horror show to try to deal with in life, not just on the roads and at work, but also in the line at Ralphs. People on welfare tend to be worse behaved than other groups and they often seem to feel more entitled to make other people pay for their bad behavior. Jews often seem to me like the most aggressive people around (in all ways except crime and violence). The Ralphs 90035 checkout line reminds me of the nightmare of driving in Israel.

So while I sweat in line, it’s 100 degrees outside, I am not in the best of moods to read on my phone Rabbi Abraham Cooper’s latest pathologizing of the goyim. The goyim I know are very good at conducting themselves efficiently and courteously in a supermarket checkout line and so I am not eager to read the rabbi rip the goyim for trying to maintain their traditions and to resist the invasion of their Islamic and African enemies.

Why Europe is so woefully unprepared for the new refugee crisis
by Rabbi Abraham Cooper
Posted on Sep. 8, 2015 at 3:07 pm

No time is a good time for an epic humanitarian crisis. But Europe today seems woefully unprepared for the human wave from the Maghreb, the Horn of Africa and lands reaching all the way to Afghanistan…

It is not only about the lack of political will and social cohesion. For even as French, British and German leaders talk about evenly distributing the burden, others such as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban have made it brutally clear that they want no part of the migrant/refugee wave; they simply want them gone. If it means constructing barbed-wire fences, posting a phalanx of police at the central train station in Budapest and duping refugees to board trains to camps, so be it.
Of course, when we see people so desperate to escape their homes that they knowingly put themselves and their children in harm’s way, when we see the lifeless body of a drowned child, we Jews are reminded of another era in Europe.
Why then is Europe so unprepared for this challenge?
It is precisely because the European Union (EU) has failed to evolve into a true “union.”
It has failed to articulate what 21st-century European social values are.
It never has addressed the failure to integrate the millions of Muslims already living in Europe.
Its foreign policy has failed to stem the killings and dislocation of Bashar Assad’s Syria. It has failed to stop ISIS.
It attempted to stop Libyans from leaving their country by removing Muammar Gadhafi. The results? The disintegration of a country and even more boat people perishing in the Mediterranean.
But are Europeans exclusively to blame for all of this? What about the United States? Tragically, the policies of “leading from behind” and “no boots on the ground” may mean fewer Americans in harm’s way in the Middle East, but the leadership vacuum has left millions of innocent people to fend for themselves with corrupt and dangerous governments who can’t even pick up the garbage.
There is one other gaping hole in the leadership of the EU: 70 years after the Shoah, rabid anti-Semitism and hate for the Jewish state infect an estimated 150 million Europeans. Seven decades after the defeat of Nazism, European governments and nongovernmental organizations have been silent over the ethnic cleansing, murder and serial rape of tens of thousands of Christians and other minorities across the Middle East.
It seems that Europe’s elite may have learned to mark their calendar to remember dead Jews one day a year, but too many have failed to internalize or apply any lessons from the Nazi era as to how to treat living Jews and other minorities.
There are no easy solutions to this crisis, but as Jews who come to pray for the wellbeing and safety of the entire world on Rosh Hashanah, we must find ways to do our share to help all legitimate refugees, be they Christian, Muslims or Yazidis.

Let me begin with the headline: “Why Europe is so woefully unprepared for the new refugee crisis”

Has any continent or country been better prepared to deal with a refugee crisis of this magnitude? No. But context does not matter to Rabbi Abraham Cooper. He’s just looking for any excuse to batter the goyim.

What was Israel’s response to the refugee crisis? Rabbi Abraham Cooper does not mention that Israel does not want to admit any of these Islamic refugees and instead, Israel is devoting its resources to building more fences against the outside world. In other words, Israel is acting sanely, in its self-interest, in much the same way Hungary has.

When Jews pursue their group interest (in not admitting Muslims who hate them), that is not worth remarking upon by Rabbi Cooper, but when goyim pursue the identical strategy, then it is time to bring out the big rhetorical guns, and you know a Holocaust analogy — completely unjustified — is about to drop on us.

Here is the crux of the rabbi’s essay:

Why then is Europe so unprepared for this challenge?
It is precisely because the European Union (EU) has failed to evolve into a true “union.”

Jews love Jewish nationalism. They take it for granted that Jews should look out first for their own people. On the other hand, Jews fear Gentile nationalisms because by definition, Gentile nationalisms excludes Jews. This is why so many Jews love the United Nations and the European Union and the idea of one world government and the like, so that the people in power can protect Jews from popular resentment. Throughout history, Jews have looked repeatedly to the people in power to protect them from the rage of the common folk. Jews often feel safer with big government. That’s a major reason so many Jews supported communism.

It has failed to articulate what 21st-century European social values are.

Values are not what hold a people together nearly as much as genetic ties. I can prove it to you. Swedes, wherever they live in the world, tend to have life results similar to Swedes who live in Sweden. Adopted children tend to have life results that mirror those of their genetic parents, not their adopting parents. Japanese, wherever they live in the world, tend to have life results that mirror those of the Japanese in Japan.

Racial diversity destroys social capital. The more diverse Europe becomes, the more frayed it will be.

As Jason Richwine wrote in 2009:

[Robert] Putnam began by telling us about one result he encountered that was thoroughly upsetting to him—the more ethnically diverse a community is, the less social capital it possesses. When a person lives in a diverse community, he trusts everyone less, including those of his own ethnic group.

So how did Putnam come to conclude that ethnic diversity is so problematic? The answer begins with the notion of “social capital,” which Putnam defines in simple terms—“social networks and the associated norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness.” Social capital turns out to be an exceptionally valuable commodity. Building complex networks of friends and associates, trusting others to keep their word, and maintaining social norms and expectations all grease the wheels of business by enabling cooperation.

But the value of social capital goes well beyond economics. Many of the activities from which people draw the most deep and lasting satisfactions are stronger and more prevalent in areas with high social capital. People living in these places tend to have more friends, care more about their community, and participate more in civic causes. Where social capital is greater, Putnam says, “children grow up healthier, safer, and better educated; people live longer, happier lives; and democracy and the economy work better.”

Rabbi Cooper continues: “It never has addressed the failure to integrate the millions of Muslims already living in Europe.”

Gypsies have lived in Europe for hundreds of years and they still have not assimilated. Is that Europe’s fault? Gypsies, like Muslims, have low IQs and are not assimilable.

Jews have assimilated to Europe in superficial ways, but as long as a Jew identifies as a Jew, his primary identity, in all likelihood, will be as a Jew, as a nation within nation if he lives in the diaspora.

Jews see themselves as a people apart. As long as they maintain their identity, they will only assimilate in superficial ways.

All peoples assimilate in only the most superficial ways. In the end, they tend to act like their genetics. Blacks act black, the Japanese act Japanese, and Jews act Jewish, wherever they live.

Christians have been struggling with Jews and Muslims for over a millennia because these individual groups have different interests that repeatedly clash with each other. You can argue about whether or not Jews are conducive to a Christian country, but there can be no argument that Muslims are a bad fit.

Rabbi Cooper writes:

There is one other gaping hole in the leadership of the EU: 70 years after the Shoah, rabid anti-Semitism and hate for the Jewish state infect an estimated 150 million Europeans. Seven decades after the defeat of Nazism, European governments and nongovernmental organizations have been silent over the ethnic cleansing, murder and serial rape of tens of thousands of Christians and other minorities across the Middle East.

No group likes to comes to terms with its distasteful past. I don’t recall much of an effort in Jewish life to come to terms with the millions of Jews who supported communism. Jews played a big role in carrying out Stalin’s genocides. All of the Americans who illegally passed nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union to build their first bomb were Jews.

I’m not listing this off to say that Jews are rotten. Jews, like all peoples, have good and bad in their history. I just don’t understand how this rabbi gets away with bashing the goyim for acting as Israel does with unwanted refugees. Rabbi Cooper rips Europe for not coming to terms with the Holocaust but he never says a peep about Jews not coming to terms with the genocides they helped carry out for Joseph Stalin.

Aiming for Clarity writes:

Let’s take a sort-of metrics-based analysis. I worry that the author of this thesis – Dr. Peter Hammond, who wrote “Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat”- may be/ is a biggot. But it’s hard to argue with these numbers:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
United States — Muslim 0.6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in: Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and ***ya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

Posted in Christianity, Diversity, Immigration, Islam, Israel, R. Abraham Cooper, Race | Comments Off on Stereotyping While Waiting In Line At Ralphs

Oil and the Business of Terror

A friend has published a new book and he tells me: I would like to invite you to read my new paper that tries to answer a question that has bothered me since September 11th, 2001. The question is “why?” Why did we respond to that attack with a war that was unnecessary and disastrously executed? Why are we on the verge of going back to war in that region? No explanation I have read makes any sense.
In my analysis, the war and its aftermath were driven by forces intent on manipulating the price of crude oil, the world’s most lucrative commodity. This is not a new idea, but I believe I have connected a few more dots than others.
Though the story is complicated, my paper is based on four simple, but seldom discussed facts:
• Oil is a commodity whose price goes up when there is a shortage or fear of a future shortage.
• Terror violence and instability in oil producing countries tends to raise the price of crude oil by taking oil production offline or creating fear that supplies will be disrupted in the future.
• The higher the price of crude oil, the more money the Saudi Royal Family, the Emir of Qatar and others earn from oil production.
• Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait, which benefit from terror-related oil price increases are the same entities who fund the terror groups that are sowing the shortage-causing mayhem.
Terrorism is part of the oil industry business model. Oil companies and Wall Street firms profit passively, but I suspect knowingly, from carnage that creates artificial oil shortages. The Bush and Obama White Houses seem to have played the role of enabler, helping their biggest donors earn huge profits regardless of the cost in American lives.

Posted in Terror | Comments Off on Oil and the Business of Terror