The Real Enemies Of America

Posted on September 10, 2015 by Luke Ford

Ann Coulter writes:

To be sure, not all our beloved refugees are Muslim terrorists. Some are Hutu terrorists. A few years ago, we took in a genocidal Rwandan, Beatrice Munyenyezi, as a “refugee.”

Only after Munyenyezi was granted citizenship did we find out that, as the federal court put it, she had “personally participated in the mass killing of innocent women, men and children merely because they were called Tutsi.”

Although her American citizenship was revoked, Munyenyezi remains a legal U.S. resident, whom we are supporting in prison for the next decade. Only an immigration court can order her deportation. Which it will not.

Mike emails: I don’t get it. For decades and decades we have been spending hundreds of millions of dollars on the Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations to track down a handful of elderly plumbers and factory workers like Demyanyuk.

What was their crime? Being Nazis? Nope. We have not expelled them for being Nazis, but for lying on their asylum/immigration applications … seventy years ago.

Is there any way to repurpose all those Jewish lawyers and Jewish investigators at the OSI to go after REAL enemies of America like Munyenyezi rather than keep pissing away piles of American tazpayer cash on a few senile, drooling Ukrainians?

[Sorry. My mistake. I looked up the OSI on Wikipedia and see that they have been rolled into some “Human Rights” investigation team at the DOJ. Which, if I don’t miss my guess, is spending its time and money tracking down “Islamophobes”.]

Posted in America, Immigration | Comments Off on The Real Enemies Of America

America Doesn’t Want Any More Refugees

Posted on September 10, 2015 by Luke Ford

Ann Coulter writes: Among the benefits of Donald Trump’s proposed immigration moratorium is that we won’t have to keep importing hordes of Third World “refugees,” such as the ones currently swarming across Europe.

For decades, the United States has taken in far more refugees than the entire rest of the world combined. Nearly half of the refugees we take in are Muslim.

And it’s worked out great!

Fazliddin Kurbanov, or “Idaho man,” as he is dutifully described in the American media, was brought to the U.S. as a refugee in 2009, joining hundreds of other Uzbeks in Boise, Idaho. He came with his wife and young child, his sister and his two ailing parents. (What an economic powerhouse that family must be. Marco Rubio is right: We’re making all kinds of money off of immigrants!)

So grateful was Kurbanov to America for rescuing his entire family from “persecution” that he spent the next few years conspiring to commit jihad against us.

As he cheerfully told his terrorist buddies back in Uzbekistan: “We are the closest ones to infidels. We have almost everything. What would you say if, with the help of God, we implement a martyrdom act? … There are military installations right here, targets, and vehicles are available as well.”

Kurbanov had plenty of time on his hands to plot terrorist attacks in the U.S. because he was being supported by you, taxpayer. As the Lewiston Morning Tribune (Idaho) reported: He was “struggling” to find a job—preferably something that involved either marketing or killing all the Jews.

Last month, Kurbanov was convicted of various terrorism charges, based on his possession of Tannerite, ammonium nitrate, bullets and aluminum powder, as well as his stated intention, in conversations recorded by the FBI, to bomb military bases in Idaho and Texas.

For the cherry on top, the whole welfare-dependent, Islamic terrorist-nurturing family won refugee status in America by claiming they were persecuted in Uzbekistan for being Christians.

I am 100 percent sure there will be no thought given to deporting the rest of this useless family. To the contrary, we’re probably bringing in their cousins. You wouldn’t want to separate families, would you?

A few years ago, the FBI realized we’d let in scores of Iraqi terrorists as “refugees,” including Mohanad Shareef Hammadi and Waad Ramadan Alwan—the latter of whose fingerprints were found on boxes of IEDs seized in Iraq. On FBI surveillance tapes, the men bragged about having used a sniper rifle to kill American soldiers north of Baghdad, blowing up Bradley tanks and building more than a dozen bombs for use against U.S. Troops.

After being happily “resettled” into public housing in Bowling Green, Kentucky, they continued their war against America, including one specific Army captain. Soldiers who had survived an IED attack that killed four troops in Iraq were warned by the FBI that their comrades’ murderers had been relocated to America—courtesy of the U.S. government—and might be coming for them.

The Boston Marathon bombers, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, had received asylum in the U.S., before launching the 2013 attacks that left four dead and thousands injured in Boston. That’s not including the three Jewish men whose throats Tamerlan slit in Waltham, Massachusetts, a few years earlier.

The entire extended Tsarnaev family got asylum based on Russia’s brutal crackdown on Chechnyan Muslims—persecution so unspeakable that various family members continued to vacation there.

Hundreds of “refugees” from Somalia and elsewhere, who have been granted fast-track U.S. citizenship because of their sworn fear of persecution in their home countries, seem to forget all about that “credible fear” as soon as the time comes to go back and engage in jihad.

To be sure, not all our beloved refugees are Muslim terrorists. Some are Hutu terrorists. A few years ago, we took in a genocidal Rwandan, Beatrice Munyenyezi, as a “refugee.”

Only after Munyenyezi was granted citizenship did we find out that, as the federal court put it, she had “personally participated in the mass killing of innocent women, men and children merely because they were called Tutsi.”

Although her American citizenship was revoked, Munyenyezi remains a legal U.S. resident, whom we are supporting in prison for the next decade. Only an immigration court can order her deportation. Which it will not.

A few other heart-warming humanitarian stories:

And the list goes on …

Even the refugees who don’t specifically come here to murder Americans aren’t fleeing persecution. They’re fleeing countries with less generous welfare policies than we have in the West. Which won’t exist anymore, if we don’t turn off the spigot from the Third World.

For at least half a century, the U.S. has taken in the vast majority of the world’s refugees. Isn’t it somebody else’s turn, now?

How about Mexico take in a few “refugees“? Why not El Salvador or Honduras? Could the pope have a word with his co-religionists about the suffering in Syria? How about Vatican City? Talk about the perfect place to build some low-income housing projects!

Maybe it’s time the world gets used to life without the United States. If our current immigration policies aren’t stopped, this country will soon be nothing more than another failed Latin American state.

Speaking of which, I note that our allies, Japan and Israel, aren’t taking in any Syrian refugees. Japan is pretty far away, but Israel is even closer to Syria than Sweden is! Evidently, Japan and Israel aren’t as gung-ho about destroying themselves as our European friends are. Donald Trump’s soaring popularity suggests that America may not be ready to commit suicide yet, either.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on America Doesn’t Want Any More Refugees

Haaretz: 9/11 and the American Response to Syria’s Huddled Masses’

Posted on September 10, 2015 by Luke Ford

Allison Kaplan Sommer writes:

With post-9/11 fear still fresh in their psyches, many Americans believe their ‘golden door’ must only be opened sparingly and selectively.

Fourteen years after the traumatic events of September 11, somber memorial ceremonies will take place at what was once known as Ground Zero, now home to the new 1 World Trade Center building with the 9/11 Memorial and Museum at its base. Not far away, so close that it is visible from the observation deck of the shining new skyscraper – stands the Statue of Liberty, housing the bronze tablet engraved with the famous Emma Lazarus poem “The New Colossus”:
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
On September 11, 2015, these two neighboring American landmarks are the symbols of an agonizing conflict between the last century’s ideals and this century’s fears. It is what lays behind the United States’ hesitation and lack of leadership in tackling the international humanitarian crisis involving the hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing Syria for the West.
With post-9/11 fear still fresh in their psyches, many Americans believe their “golden door” must only be opened sparingly and selectively, even as they see their European allies showing an extraordinary degree of generosity, welcoming tens of thousands of men, women and children.
The wariness isn’t unexpected. Since 9/11, one hasn’t had to be a refugee or an illegal immigrant to have a hard time getting in and out of the United States. Anything from receiving entry visas as a foreign tourist, replacing a passport for citizens abroad, to bringing one’s suitcase through airport security has become significantly more complicated and difficult. And it is the fact that above-board immigration is so problematic, bureaucratic, and often futile, that fuels the endless flow of illegal immigrants across the southern border.
It’s not completely new. Despite being a self-described melting pot and nation of immigrants, the U.S. has never been completely welcoming. Even in the heyday of immigration to the US, when Emma Lazarus’s poem was placed on the statute, fears of the dangers of immigration existed.  There has always been a fear of immigrants threatening the safety of native-born Americans – bringing crime and disease from Ireland, Italy or the Eastern European shtetls in the earlier part of the 20th century and from Asia, Africa, and Latin America later in the century. Such sentiments still strike a chord, if Donald Trump’s poll numbers mean anything.

The preservation of anything precious requires saying no. Is a woman bad for believing her “golden door” must only be opened sparingly and selectively? That seems to me like a sane policy. Opening up her “golden door” to any Syrian refugee who wants to enter would be suicide.

Sweden: Woman Gang-Raped by Gypsies She Allowed in Her Home Out of Pity
A woman in Ornskoldsvik pitied three Romanian beggars and decided to invite them to her home. But instead of showing gratitude, the Roma raped her.

It was on Saturday that the woman came in contact with the three men at the Travel Center in Örnsköldsvik. She invited them to her home so they could sleep, shower and eat there.

In her home during the night the Roma decided to gang-rape their host, according to the police report. She had, according to the police made ​​no sexual overtures.

On Sunday the police arrested three men. They have been charged by the prosecutors and we have been interrogated. Forensic Detectives have been at the scene and conducted an investigation, says Mikael Ahrtzing on police Västernorrland for Fria Tider.

Police are quiet about the suspects, but according to the district court, the three Roma people in their 20s and residents of Romania. Just last week, the local newspaper published Örnsköldsvik Allehanda published a major report on the Roma clan Begging at the Travel Centre in Örnsköldsvik. The article interviewed one of the now arrested the men, who told about their situation.

The men are suspected of aggravated rape.

It is the circumstances of the rape that makes us see it as rough, says Mikael Ahrtzing.

A majority of citizens of every country in the world “believe their ‘golden door’ must only be opened sparingly and selectively” just as people around the world are careful about who they invite into their homes.

A poem, not even one by Emma Lazarus, does not constitute a sane immigration policy. Why would any country want the world’s refuse? That’s nonsense.

There has never been a time (prior to the past 50 years) when America sought the world’s refuse to become immigrants. Until the 1960s, immigrants to the United States had to be whites of good character.

You can’t have nice things if you allow anyone in any more than you can have a nice home if you invite anyone in. To preserve a nice home and to preserve a specific culture, you have to practice exclusion. Orthodox Judaism and Israel, for example, are very picky about who they allow in. Would Allison Kaplan Sommer want to house a bunch of Syrian refugees in her home? How would she like them on her block? How come she says nothing in this column about the moral imperative for Israel to take in Muslim refugees? Why would any other advanced nation want to admit people with an average IQ of 83? If you want to know what Syrians will do to your country, look at Syria. They are going to replicate that disaster wherever they go.

There’s no country in the world that has successfully integrated blacks and Muslims and gypsies. Why would any country want to import that dysfunction?

When you encourage illegal immigrants, you get more of them.

A solid majority of Americans have not wanted more immigration for more than 150 years, but rarely has their will counted for much as against the elites determined to flood the country with cheap labor.

Despite being a self-described melting pot and nation of immigrants, the U.S. has never been completely welcoming.

No individual and no country in history has been completely welcoming. Has Israel been completely welcoming? Through its history until the 1960s, the United States of America saw itself as an explicitly white country. It did not see itself as a “melting pot” of various races.

There has always been a fear of immigrants threatening the safety of native-born Americans – bringing crime and disease from Ireland, Italy or the Eastern European shtetls in the earlier part of the 20th century and from Asia, Africa, and Latin America later in the century.

These fears were based on the facts. WASPs are the best behaved citizens. People from Africa and Latin America often reproduce the dysfunction and poverty of Africa and Latin America when they move to first world countries.

Posted in Immigration, Islam | Comments Off on Haaretz: 9/11 and the American Response to Syria’s Huddled Masses’

Pat Buchanan: Immigration Is About More Than Trump–It’s About The Survival Of The West

Posted on September 10, 2015 by Luke Ford

Pat Buchanan writes:

“Trump’s immigration proposals are as dangerous as they are stunning,” railed amnesty activist Frank Sharry.

“Trump … promises to rescind protections for Dreamers and deport them. He wants to redefine the constitutional definition of U.S. citizenship as codified by the 14th Amendment. He plans to impose a moratorium on legal immigration.”

While Sharry is a bit hysterical, he is not entirely wrong.

For the six-page policy paper [PDF] to secure America’s border and send back aliens here illegally, released by Trump last weekend, is the toughest, most comprehensive, stunning immigration proposal of the election cycle.

The Trump folks were aided by people around Sen. Jeff Sessions who says Trump’s plan “reestablishes the principle that America’s immigration laws should serve the interests of its own citizens.”

The issue is joined, the battle lines are drawn, and the GOP will debate and may decide which way America shall go. And the basic issues—how to secure our borders, whether to repatriate the millions here illegally, whether to declare a moratorium on immigration into the USA—are part of a greater question.

Will the West endure, or disappear by the century’s end as another lost civilization? Mass immigration, if it continues, will be more decisive in deciding the fate of the West than Islamist terrorism. For the world is invading the West.

A wild exaggeration? Consider.

Monday’s Washington Post had a front-page story on an “escalating rash of violent attacks against refugees,” in Germany, including arson attacks on refugee centers and physical assaults.

Burled in the story was an astonishing statistic. Germany, which took in 174,000 asylum seekers last year, is on schedule to take in 500,000 this year. Yet Germany is smaller than Montana.

How long can a geographically limited and crowded German nation, already experiencing ugly racial conflict, take in half a million Third World people every year without tearing itself apart, and changing the character of the nation forever?

Do we think the riots and racial wars will stop if more come?

And these refugees, asylum seekers and illegal immigrants are not going to stop coming to Europe. For they are being driven across the Med by wars in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen, by the horrific conditions in Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia and Sudan, by the Islamist terrorism of the Mideast and the abject poverty of the sub-Sahara.

According to the U.N., Africa had 1.1 billion people by 2013, will double that to 2.4 billion by 2050, and double that to 4.2 billion by 2100.

How many of these billions dream of coming to Europe? When and why will they stop coming? How many can Europe absorb without going bankrupt and changing the continent forever?

Does Europe have the toughness to seal its borders and send back the intruders? Or is Europe so morally paralyzed it has become what Jean Raspail mocked in “The Camp of the Saints”?

The blazing issue in Britain and France is the thousands of Arab and African asylum seekers clustered about Calais to traverse the Eurotunnel to Dover. The Brits are on fire. Millions want out of the EU. They want to remain who they are.

Each week we read of boats sinking in the Med with hundreds of refugees drowning. Yet many, many more make it to the Greek and Italian islands, and thence north to Germany and Scandinavia and the welfare states of Western Europe. Once they step onto EU soil, they are in.

This unending invasion has called into existence anti-immigrant and anti-EU parties in almost every country in Europe. Few of these parties existed at the turn of the century. How does this all end?

“Humankind cannot bear very much reality,” wrote T. S. Eliot.

Is the West still blind to reality, to the inevitable future that awaits if the West does not secure its frontiers and close its borders to mass immigration?

Peoples of European descent, everywhere they live, have birth rates below replacement levels. Yet, most live in the world’s most desirable neighborhoods.

The great and growing populations of mankind are in the Third World. Countless millions are determined to come to the West, legally if they can, illegally if they must. And the more who succeed, the more who come.

Either Western nations take tough measures to secure their borders, or the Western nations will be swamped. The character of their countries will be altered forever, and smaller countries will become unrecognizable. And as this is happening, ethnic and racial clashes will become more common, as they are now becoming across Europe.

“The principle that America’s immigration laws should serve the interests of its own citizens” is paramount, said Sen. Sessions.

Sessions is right. America is our home. We decide who comes in and who does not, how large the American family becomes, whom we adopt and whence they come. It has become the issue of 2016.

Indeed, it is the issue of the 21st century.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Pat Buchanan: Immigration Is About More Than Trump–It’s About The Survival Of The West

Donald Trump’s Rise Sparks Widespread Angst Among Jewish Republicans

Posted on September 10, 2015 by Luke Ford

Jews fear white nationalism more than anything else in the West. Gentile nationalisms, almost by definition, tend to exclude Jews.

Jews love Jewish nationalism, but Jewish groups often prescribe multi-culturalism and diversity for the goyim.

Israel, the Jewish state, is governed to serve the needs of the majority, but Jews fear that very thing in America and Europe where the majority is white non-Jews. In the diaspora, Jews have often sided with the fringe against the core.

Chaim Amalek writes: “Lots of Jews love Trump, and why not? He’s almost family. If you mean the elites like Cantor who are part of the same Republican establishment that back every Bush, who cares? The elites no matter their religion are not backing Trump, in part because they cannot buy him off.”

From the Forward:

“There are a lot of folks who are, to be charitable, into white identity politics, and to be uncharitable are outright racists, who are supporting Trump,” said Nathan Wurtzel, a Republican political consultant and principal at The Catalyst Group, who is Jewish. “It’s very off-putting and disturbing.”
Trump’s pundit-defying rise has highlighted the distance between the Republican Party’s growing Jewish caucus and some parts of its base. That’s an unlikely role for Trump, who has perhaps the most personal ties to the Jewish community of any Republican candidate: His daughter Ivanka Trump converted to Judaism in 2009, and Trump has lived his life in the heavily Jewish milieu of upper-class Manhattan. “Not only does he have a daughter who is… Shabbat observant, but he’s also a brash, outspoken real estate magnate,” said Jeff Ballabon, a Jewish Republican activist. “In some sense he seems more like an insider than an outsider to our culture.”
Republican Jewish leaders, certain that with each major gaffe Trump would sink himself, are only beginning to take Trump seriously. Fred Zeidman, an RJC board member, Bush supporter and major Republican fundraiser, said in late August that he had not yet discussed Trump with other RJC board members. “I don’t think anybody thought this was as serious as it is,” he said.
Republican Jewish operatives have worked hard in recent decades to pave inroads into the party for Jewish voters, and to jack up Jewish support for Republican candidates. To that end, the RJC has cultivated candidates like Ohio state treasurer Josh Mandel, who ran an unsuccessful campaign for the Senate in 2012, and former Hawaii governor Linda Lingle, who now serves on the group’s board. Recent polls show that those efforts could be working: A January Gallup report found that only 61% of American Jews called themselves Democrats in 2014, down from 71% in 2008. The percentage of Americans at large who call themselves Democrats has fallen only seven points over the same period.
Jewish Republicans, however, don’t look quite like other Republicans. Many RJC board members are pro-choice and support same-sex marriage, which puts them at a distance from much of the party. And while some Jewish Republicans share wholeheartedly in the party’s conservative ideals, the RJC and its allies have also been working to attract Jewish moderates and liberals, who simply believe the Democrats have been unfriendly to Israel. Some worry that it’s these Jewish supporters who could be put off by Trump.
“I think Trump could make the Republican party look unattractive to people who are more moderate in nature, to the extent the party is made to look more unwelcoming,” Wurtzel said.
The problem with Trump for these Republican Jewish activists isn’t necessarily Trump’s positions, to the extent that they exist, on top-line issues for Jewish voters. Republican Jewish elites see Trump as a hawkish supporter of Israel, like nearly all other members of the Republican primary field. In a September 3 interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, Trump said he would support unilateral action by Israel against Iran, and called Benjamin Netanyahu “a friend.”
Instead, Trump is seen as a threat to the vision of a bigger, more inclusive GOP, which many leading Republican Jews have advocated.
“In order for us to become a party [of anyone] other than white men, we need to be reaching out,” Norm Coleman, a former senator from Minnesota, told the Forward. Coleman, an RJC board member who is supporting Graham’s primary bid, said, “I think Trump’s language and perspective is a long-term negative in terms of building the party.”
A Gallup poll released in late August showed that Hispanics have exceptionally negative opinions about Trump, while their opinions about the rest of the Republican candidates range from mildly positive to slightly negative.
Following Mitt Romney’s decisive defeat in 2012, RJC board member Fleischer and a handful of other major party figures collaborated on a report to the Republican National Committee. The report argued, in part, that the GOP needed to reach out to growing ethnic minority groups, particularly Hispanics, to remain competitive amid changing national demographics. While Bush has built those appeals into the bedrock of his campaign, Trump appears to be crumpling such hopes and throwing them back in the face of the party establishment. Trump has gotten into a shouting match with a popular Univision anchor, doubled-down on his right to be offensive toward women, and continually hyped a purported violent threat posed by undocumented immigrants.
In the process, Trump has also drawn the backing of an enthusiastic contingent of white nationalists. “You’ll see it a lot on the Internet,” said Wurtzel, who is active on Twitter. In a New Yorker article published in late August, writer Evan Osnos quoted Richard Spencer, head of a white nationalist think tank, saying that Trump embodies “an unconscious vision that white people have — that their grandchildren might be a hated minority in their own country.”

Posted in Donald Trump, Jews, Nationalism | Comments Off on Donald Trump’s Rise Sparks Widespread Angst Among Jewish Republicans

Spectator: Why does the left care more about Islamophobia than anti-Semitism?

Posted on September 10, 2015 by Luke Ford

Brendan O’Neill writes:

Why do leftists care more about Muslims than they do about Jews? If that sounds confrontational, consider this: this week, the Met Police released the latest hate-crime figures for London. They show that offences against Jews have risen by 93% over the past year, while offences against Muslims have risen by 70%. And guess which story the BBC, Guardian and Independent, those voices of the British liberal conscience, have chosen to flag up? Yep, the 70% hike in Islamophobic attacks, not the nearly 100% hike in anti-Semitic offences.

The BBC’s headline is ‘Islamophobic crime in London “up by 70%”‘. The Guardian‘s is ‘Hate crimes against Muslims soar in London’. The Indie opts for ‘Hate crimes against Muslims in London “up by 70%”‘. What about the crimes against Jews? Sorry, no room for those. They aren’t mentioned. Whether as a result of how the cops chose to press-release their new figures or how editors chose to interpret them, or maybe a bit of both, someone down the line has taken the decision that a bashed-up or verbally abused Muslim is more newsworthy than a bashed-up or verbally abused Jew.

This is becoming increasingly common. For some reason, so-called progressives, especially those of a leftist bent, are made more upset by hatred of Muslims than they are by hatred of Jews. It’s why the very people – Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Diane Abbott, every leftie on Twitter – who normally rail against racism, and against the people who rub shoulders with racists, could in essence say ‘What’s all the fuss?!’ when it was revealed Jeremy Corbyn had been hanging out with Holocaust deniers.

Brian emails:

You make excellent points with respect to this strange emphasis but would you agree this might be the inevitable consequence of the left (Jewish left?) deconstructing union/worker based solidarity and replacing it with the this effort to balkanize EVERYONE not in the dominant culture.

And this conflict between Jews and Muslims would not be an issue if not for Jewish leadership emphasizing non-white immigration.

What’s genuinely inexplicable to me is the lack of coherent conversation within the Jewish community around the topic of … “we rabidly support Muslim immigration … and Muslim are being mean to us.”

Do you have an insight? Writings ?

Luke – you are very brave. It takes a kind of singular courage to follow your beliefs to their logical and ethical ends.

Luke: As more Jews get murdered by Muslims, this might shift.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Islam, Nationalism | Comments Off on Spectator: Why does the left care more about Islamophobia than anti-Semitism?

NYT: Migrant Tide Bringing Out Europe’s Best and Worst

Posted on September 9, 2015 by Luke Ford

So let me guess, what is Europe’s best is welcoming Islamic and African immigration?

NYT: “BERLIN — Thousands of volunteers have heeded calls to help the stream of migrants arriving in Europe in recent days, cheering them at train stations in Austria and Germany and showering them with food, drinks and toys. But signs of tension have continued to appear this week, even in the most welcoming countries, reflecting fear, misunderstanding or racism as the Continent struggles to cope with an influx of tens of thousands of people.”

What is racism? When a goy cares about his people as much as Orthodox Jews care about Jews.

I see almost no voices allowed in the MSM noting that the import of low IQ immigrants is against the best interests of European countries.

Posted in Europe, Immigration | Comments Off on NYT: Migrant Tide Bringing Out Europe’s Best and Worst

WaPo: “Flood of Asylum Seekers Could Help Defuse a Demographic Time Bomb”

Posted on September 9, 2015 by Luke Ford

boston-28_2540936b

“Refugee helping host society defuse demographic time bomb (too bad about Martin Richard, age 8, but as Stalin, or maybe The Economist, said: you can’t defuse a demographic time bomb without blowing up a few Little Leaguers)”

Posted in Europe, Germany, Immigration | Comments Off on WaPo: “Flood of Asylum Seekers Could Help Defuse a Demographic Time Bomb”

JTA: Mindful of risks, European Jews urge aid to refugees

Posted on September 9, 2015 by Luke Ford

Nowhere in this story do I hear these pious Jewish leaders expressing concern about what a flood of Muslims into Europe will do to Europeans. All I hear is concern for the refugees and concern for Jews. But what about concern for the goyim? Don’t they have a right to defend their civilization?

These Jewish leaders prescribe the opposite for the goyim (diversity) from what I presume they seek for Jews (cohesion).

Where was this Jewish enthusiasm for illegal immigrants when it was Africans illegally entering Israel and taking up residence? How come Jewish groups did not have similar drive to facilitate that demographic takeover of a native population? Where were the rabbis speaking out for subsidizing and encouraging Africans to pour into Israel? How come open borders is a wonderful idea for goyim but a terrible idea for the Jewish state?

Just because a group, be they Jews or Muslims or leftists, invoke the language of universal moral norms does not mean that this is the true criteria underlying their actions. You would be smarter to look at how what they are advocating benefits their group.

Making it easier for Muslims to illegally enter Europe and America is explicitly seeking the destruction of Europe and America.

What’s right and wrong here largely comes down to a simple question — whose side are you on?

Every Major American Jewish Organization Including The Orthodox Union And Agudath Israel Supports Immigration Amnesty.

From JTA:

When he looks into the tired eyes of the Syrian refugees now flooding Europe’s borders, Guy Sorman is reminded of his father, Nathan, who fled Germany for France just months before Adolf Hitler came to power.

“He wanted to go to the United States. Visa declined. He tried Spain, same result. He ended up in France, neither welcome nor deported,” Sorman wrote last week in an Op-Ed in Le Monde in which he argued that Europe should learn from its abandonment of the Jews during the Holocaust and accommodate the stream of migrants pouring through its borders from the war-torn Middle East.

Sorman’s view is not uncommon among European Jews, many of them living in societies still grappling with a sense of collective guilt for their indifference to the Nazi genocide — or complicity in it. At a Holocaust memorial event in Paris on Sunday, French Chief Rabbi Haim Korsia urged Europe’s leaders to match the actions of non-Jews who saved Jews from the Nazis by welcoming Syrian refugees.

Yet as many European Jews rush to the refugees’ aid in word and deed, some worry that letting them stay may further contribute to the anti-Semitic violence driving Jews to leave Europe, much of it perpetrated by immigrants from the Middle East. Eager to exploit such fears, ISIS claimed in July that it had sent 1,000 fighters to infiltrate Europe as refugees.

“Some of these new immigrants — the Syrians and Iraqis especially — have been taught to hate Jews,” Henri Gutman, president of the left-leaning Belgian Jewish cultural group CCLJ, wrote in an Op-Ed published August 31 on the organization’s website. “We risk further increases in anti-Semitism.”

While urging “generosity” toward the refugees, Gutman said Europeans must observe “imperatives of defense” against Islamism. The Central Jewish Organization of the Netherlands, where two elderly Holocaust survivors were hospitalized recently following an assault by robbers who appeared to be Middle Eastern immigrants, spoke to a similar tension in a statement from its chairman, Ron van der Wieken.

While “aware that some Middle Eastern refugees harbor very negative feelings toward Jews … Jews cannot withdraw support from those in need and fleeing serious violence,” van der Wieken wrote. He urged Holland to devise a “charitable” refugee policy.

Such tension even exists for some of the hundreds of Jews helping the refugees on the ground in Hungary, Austria, Italy and beyond.

“As Eastern European Jews, we carry the knowledge of how it feels like to flee our homes,” said Zoltan Radnoti, the newly elected chairman of the rabbinical board of the Mazsihisz umbrella group of Hungarian Jewish communities. “Still, I help the refugees with fear that I am helping send danger to other Jews in Europe. I know some of the refugees may have fired on our [Israeli] soldiers. Others would have done so in a heartbeat. I know. But I am duty bound to help.”

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Holocaust, Immigration, Islam, Jews, Syria | Comments Off on JTA: Mindful of risks, European Jews urge aid to refugees

Rabbi Reuven Bulka Wants To Help Syrian Migrants Get A New Life In Canada

Posted on September 9, 2015 by Luke Ford

REPORT: “What we have here is a wellspring of positive energy that this committee hopes, with the help of the mayor as leader, to harness and to be ready when the avalanche comes of refugees coming here,” Rabbi Reuven Bulka said.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Rabbi Reuven Bulka Wants To Help Syrian Migrants Get A New Life In Canada