May 13, 2016 The Miscegenation Indoctrination Machine Is Fully Functional Luke Ford No sacred cows.

The Miscegenation Indoctrination Machine Is Fully Functional

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

This ad from T-Mobile is just one example of the avalanche of miscegenation propaganda that’s been spilling out of the marketing departments of nearly every major American corporation and media organ for the past ten years, and which have been increasing in frequency tremendously since about two years ago.

Why this sudden explosion of commercial, media, and government mongrelization indoctrination?

I can think of four possible reasons why Globo-Homo oligarchies and their paid-for government shills would actively promote miscegenation as selling points for their products/programs.

Corporations have been overrun by SJW board members, executives, and managers. There are “true believers” now running major consumer and media industries, and they push miscegenation because they genuinely believe in its intrinsic value or they genuinely believe in its value as a mindfuck to ostracize and dispirit those (goyim) who aren’t autonomic cheerleaders for the muddy waters narrative.
Corporations are being heavily pressured by SJWs and Numinous Negro shock troops to be more “inclusive” and “fight White privilege”, and the corps are responding by appeasing these freaks, figuring that the small cost in a presumed tiny number of lost irate customers outweighs the larger cost of bad publicity or settling frivolous lawsuits.
Corporate boards have data which shows that miscegenation sells (to their identified market demos)! They push it cynically, to increase their bottom line, feeling no particular emotional attachment to it. If this rationale is true, then that means a growing wedge of American consumers, particularly those with discretionary cash, eat this MiscProp up. Sad!
The ol’ smoke-n-mirrors. Corporations have created a large and avaricious Miscegenation Indoctrination Machine to distract from their 1%er takeover of the American economy. Keep their natural enemies — anti-fat cat shitlibs and low disgust threshold normies — occupied with technicolor hot button agitprop so that their attention is never drawn to the Globo-Homo elites’ championing of open borders, one-way trade agreements, and outsourcing that funnels money into the hands of fewer and fewer mega-wealthy value transferers while gutting the wages of ever more native sons of America.
I don’t know which reason is the most loathsome. All four probably have some salience (I think #2 and #4 are the biggest gears in the Miscegenation Indoctrination Machine). What I do know is that it is Good and Right to call out these Masturbators of the Cuckuverse for their reptilian scheming and attempted brainwashing. The more people that see this anti-White circus for what it is — the gravest show on earth — the more likely that the malevolent purveyors of mongrelization are beaten back to the loony bins where they belong and America can be great again.

PS I object less to authentically in-love mixed couples than I do to the active propaganda by our overlords to shove it down our throats like some twisted creeper’s idea of love.

COMMENTS:

* #5. Liberals that work in marketing selling campaigns to liberals that run corporations. These liberals think they are Rosa Parks every time they put a black person over whites. They also think they can make blacks into Rosa Parks by giving them academic theories of racism and affirmative action advantages. Everyone wants to be Rosa Parks.

* Maybe they know that black male-white female couples turn heads. The first test of the effectiveness of an advertisement is if people actually look at it.

* It is an incredibly powerful way to garner attention; I have read people describe how their head swivelled when they went past such ads. Nor does its use exclude any of the other ways to garner attention you described.

I have never seen anyone else point ‘this rationalization’ out. If it is ‘well-worn’ show me another instance.

Just because we are not supposed to notice race doesn’t mean they can’t take advantage of the fact that we do and they know we do.

* I pointed this out to my teenaged sons again just yesterday when another one of these commercials came on. “Ask yourself why the white father is a pathetic object of ridicule on 95% of these shows. Ask yourself why every “personal color,” in contrast, is wise/unusually capable/the object of desire. I want you to make your judgments based on your actual experiences, boys – not based on some fantasy world that’s being pushed for some reason.”

It’s not the first time I talked to them about this. My older son replied “I know, dad. I see it everywhere. It’s everywhere. I couldn’t not notice it after you started pointing it out.”

They need to understand that they are members of the best only group it is acceptable to hate. They also know that they need to be careful about committing the “crime of noticing” when they’re vulnerable to retaliation.

* And it all starts with the SJW getting into positions of… surprise surprise, HR! They make a stink there first, threatening people with tribunals for think crimes, then it moves outward from there. Same goes for race, religion, sexual orientation stink.

Case in point: a startup company I worked for never had any policies in place. Withing few months of hiring a Pakistani software developer they had everyone take a sensitivity/harassment course, followed by a creation of meditation/prayer/nursing/relaxation room (hint: prayer!).

And don’t even get me started on what women’s presence has done to research and development departments historically filled with men of potty mouths and poor personal hygiene. Everyone is walking on eggshells now? Unless you’re working for a startup, you’re SOL and have to really watch your mouth.

* I recently had an HR recruiter in my company chastise me for dismissing applicants that did not interview well with my team due to lack of humor, not looking in the eye, etc,…

She told me I needed “diversity” and “balance” on my team. No shit, she started using those bullshit words.

The winning blow? I went to her boss and said I “felt very bullied” by her. Use the “feelz” word wherever you can, and fight back with the “bully” moniker as well.

She backed down after that.

* A few years ago, I used to think the magic neegrows on movies were put there as a way to motivate their brethren to improve themselves, but eventually I figured it out it was all propaganda against the white world.

* A few years ago an ADT commercial with a white guy breaking into a black woman’s house. I don’t think in all of human history has that ever happened. Completely unrealistic and absolutely ridiculous.

* “In other instances, curators would inject a story—even if it wasn’t being widely discussed on Facebook—because it was deemed important for making the network look like a place where people talked about hard news. “People stopped caring about Syria,” one former curator said. “[And] if it wasn’t trending on Facebook, it would make Facebook look bad.” That same curator said the Black Lives Matter movement was also injected into Facebook’s trending news module. “Facebook got a lot of pressure about not having a trending topic for Black Lives Matter,” the individual said. “They realized it was a problem, and they boosted it in the ordering. They gave it preference over other topics. When we injected it, everyone started saying, ‘Yeah, now I’m seeing it as number one’.” This particular injection is especially noteworthy because the #BlackLivesMatter movement originated on Facebook, and the ensuing media coverage of the movement often noted its powerful social media presence.”

* It’s not “the corporations,” it’s the ad agencies.

Premise 1: There’s still no good way to evaluate the effectiveness of advertising. Oh, sometimes there will be a campaign which really boosts sales (Grey Poupon, for instance), but by and large companies have an ad budget, they make ad buys, and their sales respond to . . . market conditions and random factors.

Premise 2: Given Premise 1, the Marketing Department of corporations and the ad agencies they buy from have a lot of crossover, and form a more or less self-contained community with little connection to what the corporations actually do. In other words, there’s more common culture among Exxon’s marketing department, Ben & Jerry’s marketing department, and the big ad agencies.

Premise 3: Given the first two, it’s easy to see that ads like this are virtue-signaling on the part of marketing and advertising people. Does showing mixed-race families sell product? No. Does showing mixed-race families help the careers of the people who came up with the ad? Yes.

The 1950s:

Posted in Dating | Comments Off

High Investment Parenting

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

Source.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off

The Omerta Olympics

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

Mickey Kaus writes: Even apolitical owners of big, mainstream media outlets typically don’t like to bring up the immigration debate. At the very least it’s “divisive.” More important, reporting on, say, support for a border wall could alienate new, growing blocs of ethnic consumers that businesses (especially newspapers) want to reach. But it’s not easy to write long, important thumbsuckers about Trump’s primary victory without even mentioning the issue that both launched his campaign into prominence and fueled its continued rise. Luckily, America’s premier journalists are up to the job. Let’s pause to honor three of them:

— Ron Brownstein of the Atlantic numbs the mind and tests the bladder with “How Trump Rose to Power,” an extensive, tedious listing of which groups went marginally more for Trump and which didn’t, without any hint of why they went one way or another. The word “immigration” only appears in a little sidebar box giving results of poll suggesting it was Trump’s best issue, something Brownstein cleverly ignores. Whatever corporations are funding his elaborate “Next America” ~~boondoggle~~ project should be relieved.

— Jim Rutenberg, who replaced the late David Carr at the New York Times, tries to explain why the press failed to anticipate Trump’s rise. He highlights one early harbinger of turmoil, Eric Cantor’s 2014 defeat, which he describes like this:

A conservative economics professor and political neophyte named David Brat decided he would challenge the House Republican majority leader Eric Cantor for his Virginia congressional seat. There were few Republicans more powerful than Mr. Cantor, so Mr. Brat’s bid seemed quixotic. Mr. Cantor’s own pollster released numbers days before the election showing a 34-point lead for the congressman, and the closest public poll showed Mr. Cantor up by 13 points.

When Mr. Cantor lost, headlines labeled it an “earthquake” and a “shocker.” And it was, for people who relied solely on polls. It was less so for reporters — like Jake Sherman of Politico, Jenna Portnoy and Robert Costa of The Washington Post and the staff at Breitbart News — who went to Virginia, and talking to actual humans, picked up on the potential trouble for Mr. Cantor.

I don’t know, doesn’t that seem as if those grafs ares missing something … like the biggest issue in the race: the Gang of 8 immigration amnesty bill, denounced by Brat’s supporters — an issue Cantor tried desperately to defuse? But really, there’s no need to mention substance when we can focus on the process. We all have to ask ourselves the question: What would Facebook do? … P.S.: Rutenberg also perpetuates the bogus idea that everyone failed to anticipate Trump’s success: “Wrong, wrong, wrong — to the very end, we got it wrong.” What you mean, “we” …? Lots of people (mainly people who recognized the power of the immigration issue) got it right.

— Howard Kurtz of Fox dashes off a piece on Trump and the “working-class Americans who helped power [his] bid” without mentoning you know what. Of course, “Trump’s appeal to [working class] voters is often described in economic terms,” he notes. But who wants to spend time discussing that (e.g. the waves of immigrants who are plausibly said to have lowered their wages)? The culural aspect is much more interesting! They’re sick of being told to ‘check their privilege’ by Ivy Leaguers, for example.

Kurtz is no fool. He knows the Murdoch network’s tradition of downplaying the immigration/amnesty issue (even when no longer trashing Trump). He can mention trade (twice). But not that other thing.

So who’s the winner of the Omerta Olympics? I’d have to give it to Rutenberg. Kurtz and Brownstein have bosses to please. But Rutenberg’s still in the honeymoon period of his new job; he could have gotten away with a little disruption. Instead, he played it safe, issuing a stirring plea for more “on-the-ground reporting.” (If only they’d sent some reporters to New Hampshire.)

P.S.: Additional nominations accepted. …

P.P.S.: New York‘s Jonathan Chait, like Rutenberg, sets out to explain why “almost everyone” failed to predict Trump’s win. His conclusion: “The Republican Party turns out to be filled with idiots” — e.g. voters who unexpectedly didn’t see through Trump the way, say, Jonathan Chait sees through Trump. Never mind that this isn’t so much an explanation as a restatement of the problem — it’s Chait’s job, after all, to anticipate the behavior of voters whether it’s idiotic or not. Why did they so disappoint him and confound his expectations? It’s a mystery–since Chait doesn’t mention immigration either. …

I think we know why they blew it.

Posted in Immigration, Journalism | Comments Off

ESPN: How NFL Quarterbacks Are Nurtured

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* None of this indicates that it’s nurture. People with good work ethics and the drive to be successful in any field are generally going to have good genetics, which means they will come from relatively wealthy two-parent homes.

A lot of times, nature and nurture are conflated. That’s why you need to rely on behavioral genetics for your priors before interpreting this kind of data.

To be the best at something requires an innate desire to master it, and I’m really doubtful that parents can instill that given all the research that shows parenting has no effect of anything (see Jayman blog at the side of your screen). Football practice takes a lot of time and energy, and if your 6 foot tall, 180 pound son doesn’t want to do it, he’s not going to.

* If being drafted into the NFL as a QB were not highly dependent on nurture, why would football practice require so much effort?

Steve’s point, I take it, isn’t that being 6 foot 5, strong, with a great arm and a quick mind, isn’t genetic, or that it doesn’t help you get drafted. The point is that, as people compete more and more to develop the particular skills needed for QB, nature will begin to recede in relative importance compared to nurture.

* “Practice” does not mean “nurture.” Your work ethic is genetic, as are your tastes. If environment matters, it’s that kids want to be quarterback to get chicks and be the coolest guy in school, not because of anything their dad did.

Evolution tells us you seek status outside the home, not try to impress the people you live with.

* So Malcolm Gladwell is right – 20,000 hours of practice turns anyone who performs the practice into an expert? – even if quarterback aspirants are short in height and have small mitts?

I don’t think “nurtured” is the right word here. The right words are two: selected for physical requirements and groomed.

And are the quarterback parents “tiger” parents for their intensive grooming of their sons to become proficient quarterbacks?

* I think it’s hard for sports fans — indeed for most of us — to keep in mind just how outrageously talented pro athletes such as NFL quarterbacks really are. They are the standouts who have been selected from an already-elite group of standouts (college QBs) who have been selected from a group of standouts (high school QBs) who were usually so obviously the best players on the field that even the school librarian could pick them out.

In this sense, the ‘nurture’ of an athletically-average boy, no matter how intensive, is going to fall so far short of him being an NFL QB that it’s not even laughable. It just doesn’t happen.

One reasons the position of NFL QB is so endlessly fascinating, I think, is that it’s so incredibly difficult to excel that even armchair QBs like us can see at a glance when a spectacularly-talented actual NFL QB is deficient: missed passes, misreadings of coverage schemes, getting panicky in a disintegrating pocket and throwing a pick — there’s just so much that can go wrong that it’s easy for even casual fans to pile on joyfully in dissecting a ‘poor’ QB’s performance.

* I don’t think you quite grasp the nature of quarterbacking. Minute technical details in footwork and throwing form are huge. That is what the specialized instruction provides. A critique from an expert.

And once you get that knowledge/advice, everything snowballs. Your own practice (with dad) becomes more fruitful. You get the starting job, so more attention from team coaches, reps in practice, and game time experience.

The other skill set essential for a QB is mental. Reading the defense pre-snap, quick decision-making, and anticipation. These aspects seem like they might be tougher to teach, but getting repetition has to help. The 7 v 7 leagues or camps, played in over summers, are basically all passing. The lack of lineman reduces the fog of war providing opportunity to “put it all together”.

* Coaching makes a big difference:

* Kickers and punters are more extreme cases of this phenomenon. There was an article maybe 2-3 years ago that analyzed how recruiting high school kickers/punters to colleges works and the gist was that the top kids have parents who send them to expensive kicking coaches and camps that get them on the radar with scouts for college programs. In an interview with a head coach (who was made to seem representative), he admitted to having no idea how to evaluate kickers and punters, so all of that work was outsourced to professional camps and the kicking gurus who run them. I don’t recall a discussion of relative affluence among the recruits, but it would seem reasonable to expect it to be pretty high. My biggest takeaway from the article was that if I ever have a son my goal is going to be for him to kick for a team like Vanderbilt or Northwestern so that I won’t have to pay his tuition.

* I’ve noticed that blacks dominate free school-based sports that have a strong development system that requires little to no involvement from the parents. The ethnic background of a black athlete’s mother seems to be a major factor in whether or not they will be successful in a sport that requires heavy parental involvement.

Major League Baseball is about 8 percent non-Hispanic black and 2015 was considered a good draft year for blacks. Five of the top nine black players drafted had a non-black mother.

On Wikipedia’s list of black NHL players, about 80 percent of players with an identified ethnicity are bi-racial, the other 20 percent are mostly Caribbean. There is even a Nigerian. Seth Jones, son of NBA’s Popeye Jones, has a white mother.

In regards to outlying black quarterbacks in the story, Jacoby Brissett had Bill Parcells as a mentor. Cardale Jones caught the eye of the high school coach at age 8, had a guardian, and after graduating high school attended Fork Union Military Academy to become academically eligible for college, on scholarship I assume. Coincidentally, Christian Hackenberg, who had involved parents, spent his four years of high school at Fork Union.

* If you listen to the “Move the Sticks” podcast with Daniel Jeremiah and Bucky Brooks, frequent guest coach Brian Billick notes that there are not 32 men on the earth with the talent to play NFL QB. And that size and arm strength while important are not the determining factors (though hosts Jeremiah and Brooks, long time scouts, disagree).

Billick has argued at length past season in multiple appearances that the mental ability to read and pick apart a stout defense under pressure with “enough” arm strength and accuracy are the most important attributes for a QB. Not size and strength. The late Bill Walsh once ran a coaching session with Phil Simms. Simms relates that he was trying to impress Walsh by putting mustard on the ball, and Walsh irately told him to soften the throw, so that the receiver could catch it easily, but put it in a box that meant that only the receiver, and not any defender, could catch it.

Every team would like an Andrew Luck as QB. But the Saints won a Superbowl with a short QB, as did the Seahawks, as did the Montana led 49ers, and Favre led Packers. Heck Peyton Manning was not exactly mobile but managed the game enough to beat all-Universe Cam Newton’s superior arm and mobility (but inferior reads and pass rush management).

Even in the NFL, shortage of talent at the larger heights will allow the Wilsons and Brees to compete. Billick is right — look at last year’s roster and see how many low performing QBs there were, despite having all the right “tools.”

Posted in Football | Comments Off

Paralegal school – is it worth it? Probably not.

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments:

* For me, going to paralegal school was the first of a series of several bad decisions that I made.

* The job market for paralegals is, and has been, terrible. Paralegals have lost their jobs. Paralegal work has been farmed out. Clients are becoming more strict by the day as to what they’ll pay for. The jobs are simply not there.

* I called the local paralegal school in my area. The program costs $12,580 if you come in with your general ed done, almost $26k (!!) if you start from scratch. My work always get faxes from this school, a profile of some of their recent grads and their skills and the pay they are seeking – $12-$15/hr. That’s a hellofalot of tuition to pay for such low wages.

To exacerbate all the above, being a paralegal or legal secretary is probably one of the worst jobs out there. The lack of advancement opportunity, but more importantly the hostile environment and abuse make it so not worth it even if the pay were decent.

* Why didn’t you simply go to your local college/university or junior college instead of a proprietary college? They’re WAY cheaper and often carry ABA accreditation as well. Here in Richmond, VA, we have a major university + a community college program, as well as 2 proprietary programs. Only 1, the community college program, is ABA accredited and costs WAY less than any of the other.

* I went to a proprietary paralegal school. You had to already have a bachelors degree to get into the program. It cost $7500 and took 5 months. I got the paralegal certificate 15 years after my bachelors degree. There would have been no point to go to a “real” college because I already had a college degree and it would have taken a lot longer. My bachelors degree cost, I don’t know, at least $50,000 (1980s). The paralegal school I went to was ABA approved.

The certificate led to an entry level career oriented position. I have been in the field 10 years. I don’t find the office abusive at all. It can be challenging. It’s hard trying to always produce perfect flawless work.

Half my paralegal class never found a job working as a paralegal.

* My experience is paralegals spend more time working with clients than attorneys. Paralegals are more accessible to clients than attorneys. But, ultimately, attorneys get all the credit and glory. I think that’s because, bottom line, paralegal is a legal support vocation. I honestly don’t know what legal specialty(ies) would involve animals. But I agree with you. You may find being a veterinary technician to be more satisfying. Vet techs actually work with animals hands-on. Define “great.” Once again, I think paralegal is a tough vocation in a tough industry.

As far as well-paying jobs being hard to come by, at least around here all paralegal jobs are hard to come by. This market is very competitive, even in good times. Very few jobs come open and many excellent people compete for them. No matter how good you think you are, other people will always be better. That can be said, of course, for all vocations.

Perhaps at one time the vocation was wide open; schools would advertise that paralegal is a growth vocation. Now it appears the legal industry has absorbed all the paralegals it can and is now jettisoning many of them because of the economy.

* People often confuse being a legal secretary with being a paralegal, they are two different jobs and require different skills. Some people may be able to walk into a legal secretary position and be trained to perform the job, but it does not work that way in a paralegal position, you are expected to know the law, especially procedure, and be able to jump right in and do the job. The fact is, if you want to work in a decent sized firm that does offer good pay, benefits, and room for advancement you are going to be required to have a degree, be certified, or both. In certain areas of practice such as those involving insurance companies, the clients themselves require certification and/or degrees in order for the paralegal to be approved for billing. As for the pay, it all depends on geography and the type of law you are working in, there are some paralegals making six figure salaries. Yes, it is a stressful business, generally speaking, people’s lives are in the balance, whether literally as with criminal law, monitarily with civil, and of course there should be no need for explanation relative to family law. Duties will vary from lawyer to lawyer and firm to firm, there is no one size fits all opinion or description of a paralegal position.

REDDIT:

* For the last year or so, I’ve been considering getting my paralegal certificate. I’ve always been interested in law, worked/interned at a few law offices during college and currently work as a legal assistant. I do a lot of administrative work but have increasingly been doing more like e-filing, reviewing briefs, and being able to do a wider range of tasks. I appreciate the experience I have been getting from this job but hope that a paralegal certification program (ABA approved/part-time/1 year/requires a prior bachelor’s degree) would give me a broader overview of legal research and different areas of law along with improving my resume and opening up a wider range of future jobs.
I recently asked my boss what he thought of such programs since I’ve been considering it but wanted an attorney’s opinion. He said experience is much more important than a certification, he hasn’t found those with certifications to be any more knowledgable or better at their job, and said he would not recommend spending the money for such a program. The money is not a huge concern, but now I find myself questioning if I should be doing the program. From searching online, people’s opinions of paralegal programs seem pretty mixed and I don’t want to waste my time or money if it won’t really mean anything.

* This would depend on your state, as some state bars actually regulate paralegals, but absent a benefit like that, I agree with your boss. I’d give it some weight if I’m between two people with no experience, and one has been through a program, but if you have at least two years of experience as a paralegal in mergers and acquisitions or securities (my practice areas), a paralegal certification means nothing to me. I’d expect someone with the same amount of experience and no certification to be just as competent.

* As someone who has had some exposure to an ABA-approved paralegal certificate program, I say that if you have the time, you have the energy, and the area of the legal community you want to get into is somewhat competitive (i.e. large private law firms), you should seriously consider enrolling in and completing a paralegal certificate program.
Firstly, when you mention that you want to have a better idea of the different areas of law and various research responsibilities you can have as a paralegal, that to me is a good reason to at least enroll in the program. The desire to learn and to discover is more than enough reason to seek out more education. Also, I’m not exactly sure where you are located, but the ABA-approved program at a big university down the street from me attracts instructors that not only want to teach you law, but want to connect you to other professionals and want to help you become an awesome paralegal. Speakers are brought in that talk about the area of law they work in, how they landed their first job, and what inspires them to work so hard in their field.
Second, getting a certificate approved by the ABA could prove to be an advantage. It is true that experience in the field is invaluable, but sometimes that piece of paper is what makes or breaks the deal. Attorneys want to hire someone who is e-filing savvy, can perform discovery, put together docs they need, and do all the other important stuff they can’t get to right away. But in a big city environment like mine, positions in the legal field are competitive. And if you want to be a part of one of the top private law firms, having a paralegal certificate could possibly set you apart from the other guy who has the same level of experience as you and who also interviewed for the exact same position as you. Also, getting a certificate from an ABA-approved program is no easy feat. Not only does completion add weight to your resume, but it shows that you are disciplined in your pursuit and determined to excel as a professional paralegal.

Posted in Law | Comments Off

WP: Germany is trying to teach refugees the right way to have sex

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

Washington Post:

BERLIN — The German government is rushing to integrate hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers, offering them language classes and the prospect of work. But in a country known for its matter-of-fact acceptance of public nudity and creative forms of lovemaking, it is also trying to teach the mostly-Muslim migrants about the joy of sex.
Operating under the premise that many Syrians, Iraqis and others seeking asylum here are naive about the predilections and pitfalls of the European boudoir, Germany’s Federal Center for Health Education has gone live with a sexual education website for adult migrants. Using highly graphic diagrams and images, the $136,000 site outlines everything from first-time sex to how to perform far more advanced sexual acts.
After a rash of sexual assaults allegedly committed by suspects including asylum seekers on New Year’s Eve, the Germans have been on a mission to re-educate migrants, especially males, about sexual norms in the West. In Munich, public pools, for instance, published cartoons warning migrants not to grope women in bikinis. Also in Bavaria, public money is partially funding sexual education classes including lessons for male migrants on how to correctly approach German women.
But if all that is stick — the new government website is definitely more carrot: a guide to the pleasures of sex and the single migrant (or married, for that matter).
It’s not all fun and games. There are educational warnings on how to avoid sexually transmitted diseases and useful information for family planning. There are also explanations — which advocates say are needed for some refugees — on the need to respect gays and lesbians.
But while the illustrations may be more health class than Hustler, the site nevertheless engages in a surprisingly blunt lesson on the giving and receiving of sexual pleasure.
Sexual intercourse is fully illustrated here, along with a suggestion to “vary movements in speed, rhythm and intensity” and a special tip that it can be enjoyed while “lying, sitting, standing or squatting.”
“For example, the man can be on top of the woman, the woman on top of the man or the man behind the woman,” the site states.
It then probes deeper into the world of sexual gratification, including graphic descriptions of the various ways to perform oral sex, anal sex and masturbation.

Posted in Africa, Germany, Sex | Comments Off

Why Does Immigrant Cathy Young Hate America?

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

From PaulTown: The following is a response to Cathy Young’s Ann Coulter’s Anti-Semitism Runs Deeper Than You Know:

Why does Cathy Young, a Russian Jew immigrant formerly known as Ekaterina Jung, hate America? One would think somebody escaping the Soviet Union would have a little more respect for the people that let her in. Unfortunately, she seems consumed with hate for her host country.

America was created by and for white people. While this is an indisputable fact, Cathy plays Talmudic word games.

“Israel was founded as an ethno-state (though it is worth noting that a quarter of its citizens are not Jewish); the United States of America was not.”

There is a slight case to be made that America wasn’t founded as an “ethno-state” because a few different white groups were involved. Unfortunately for the elderly Young, she is not very quick on her feet, and bungles this simple-minded obfuscation when she says Israel was founded as an ethno-state.

You see, under Cathy’s autistic and disingenuous definition, Israel wasn’t founded as an ethno-state. “Jewish” is not an ethnicity. Ashkenazi is an ethnicity. Shepardim is an ethnicity. Does this then mean that Israel should be open to all? Of course not, and only an enemy of the country would advocate for such destructive open-door policies.

If America wasn’t founded as an ethno-state, than neither was Israel. Sorry, Ekaterina Jung, but that’s just basic deductive reasoning.

The best country in the world to be a Jew is the US. While older and more historically experienced countries in Europe are understandably wary of and hostile to foreign ethnic influence, America embraces Jewish individuals with gusto. Jewish success within media, finance, and law are well known and often a source of pride for the few Republican Jews that exist. Why Cathy wants to ruin this relationship is humorously puzzling.

White Americans aren’t in Israel pushing to undermine the Jewish people and their homeland. Why are Jews like Cathy trying to do that to America? Does she fear that a discriminatory immigration policy that favors Europeans and selects against parasitic groups will quickly turn against her and her co-ethnics? That seems quite paranoid. One must conclude that Young believes Jews to be an objective net negative on gentile society. If that’s the case, Cathy should stop being a rabid Jew hater. There is no room in America for hateful people like her.

In summation, Cathy Young is not particularly intelligent. When confronted with basic facts, she panics and throws out meaningless slurs like “anti-Semite” or simply lies her way around the truth. While some have made a handsome career out of nepotism and these dirty tricks (Ben Shapiro springs to mind), Young has remained a minor player without much influence. Cathy’s permanent almost-relevance is the fate of many midwits.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Cathy Young | Comments Off

Frustrated Mother

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

Frustrated mother changing a diaper: “I should have swallowed that night.”

Posted in Personal | Comments Off

Dangerous Donald

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off

The Megaphone in One Graph

Posted on May 13, 2016 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer: “The New York Times has a tool called Chronicle for telling you what percentage of Times article have included a particular word over the centuries. Here we see “racism” in green, “sexism” in black, and “transgender” in blue, all shooting up post 2010: the Establishment having a nervous breakdown.”

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* How many times a day does the average person hear or read these words? Every day I hear them constantly from morning till night through all media. Television, movies, commercials and ads all incorporate some propaganda in them. When you start noting each and every single instance throughout the day a person starts to realize what a total propaganda matrix we’re all living in.

* It’s not the establishment having a nervous breakdown. It’s the exultation that comes right before the final killing thrust. The early celebration when you are up by three touchdowns with only a minute on the clock. Insert your own metaphor, but it’s been rampant, shameless, public acknowledgement of supreme power since Obama came into office and the SJW dominoes continued to fall. Obamacare legalized via Judicial fiat? Check. Gay marriage via Supreme Court? Check. De facto open borders? Check. Drastically increased miscegenation in television and movies? Check. Normalization of transgenders? Check. Covert anti-white propaganda becoming overt? Check. On and on it goes. Victory after victory.

The Trump phenomenon has come as an unexpected shock, causing sudden panic and even more pushing of the agenda. If he wins this thing, he could be on his way to being the greatest American since George Washington.

* Rubble Kings is a very good documentary about the complete disintegration of the Bronx in the 70′s from the guys who were actually involved.
The biker look that the black gangs wore was lifted from the Hells Angels. The Angels were the only American counterculture of the 60′s/70′s that signaled toughness and masculinity and the black and Latin gangs in NYC latched onto it with gusto.

* Tom Wolfe wrote a lot about the pimp look around 1970. The NWA gangsta rap Los Angeles Raiders fan look always seemed like they were trying kind of hard to look masculine. The pimp look didn’t worry about that.

* Are you saying that Easy-e, who got aids in the 80s, wasn’t as masculine as he seemed?

* I need help!

Someone is passing around “memos” on all of this stuff. Feel privileged if you are one of the few who are getting the memos. I’m not and I’m starting to worry that there is something fundamentally wrong with me.

Remember, this is all is important stuff (see below) … since otherwise you are on the “out” and not part of the revolutionary change quickly reshaping the country. Does anyone have any ideas about how I can get on the memo list?

A few examples:

I didn’t see this coming. Did you notice that it only took a few day for all Confederate Flags to be taken out of stores and off the market? This included Amazon where Nazi regalia continued to be for sale. I’m a student of Civil War history and was about to buy one and then they were gone.

Did you notice that Paula Dean’s media and publishing empire collapsed within a few days and she was wiped clean from the national media when an employee claimed her son used the “N” word in one of her restaurants? What did Paula Dean do wrong besides showcase unhealthy food? Somehow I don’t get it … but perhaps I should get it.

I didn’t see this coming either. Did you notice how the media began hyping full civil rights for homosexuals and lesbians and then the transgendered in the name of diversity in the face of a massive majority of citizens opposing the social changes. For homosexuals, this happened over a few days. For the transgendered, it happened over a few weeks. Then, we discovered that toddlers and adolescents can be transgendered. How blind we’ve been all of these years!

This shocked me. I thought that Federal officials had to take an oath to uphold the Constitution that specified the powers and authorities for governing the United States as a NATION. Then, John Kerry, the US Secretary of State, tells college students last week to be prepared for living without borders. “You’re about to graduate into a complex and borderless world ….” Aren’t we still a NATION? I didn’t get the memo. That upsets me.

I’m confused. Have you noticed that Blacks are now featured in at least 50% of all television commercials. In many, they are the lead ethnicity. In others, they are the only ethnicity … and it’s not Black History Month. One would think that companies are chasing their dollars since they must represent a new and lucrative market the rest of us are unaware of. Now I’m confused because the economic statistics from the SSA document that White net worth is 3.53 times that of Hispanics, and 4.16 times that of Blacks. Aren’t Whites consumers anymore? Why are we invisible?

Please help if you know a way for me to start getting the memos ahead of time so I can be part of this revolution. I’m tired of being a passive, confused observer.

* I’d say that social media is the big reason:

1. Ricochet self-indulgent sanctimony across homogeneous ideological echo chambers.

2. Fortify said sanctimony with Likes.

3. Amplify accordingly– as if there is a worldwide competition called: “Nobody Hates [Racism] [Sexism] [Transphobia-ism] More Than Me!!!”

After a few years you get parabolic graphs like the one above, where the Y coordinate flies off the page into the stratosphere.

* One of the striking things is just how much they’ve completely lost their heads over identity politics, and, most especially, transgenderism.

How can it be that there is so much more attention paid to racism today, in the day in which a black has been elected President, than there was in the time of segregation and Martin Luther King Jr.?

And how can it be that the issue of transgenderism — a frankly freak condition that affects well less than 1 person in a thousand — can receive more attention (twice as much, by my reckoning) than racism did in the time of segregation and Martin Luther King Jr.?

This isn’t so much a graph of the megaphone as it is of the mob mind going mad, feeding on its own hysteria to create more hysteria.

I really hope that this graph gets the wide circulation it deserves. Let the obsessed, manic cretins at the Times figure out how to explain what this graph makes perfectly plain.

* The best part of the Obama era is the racial healing that Mr. Hopey Changey Lightbringer has brought to us all. This is absolutely the best part and worth putting up with all of the rest – the lies about keeping your doctor, about Benghazi, the flouting of the Constitutional limits on the President’s power, the unprecedented extension of Federal oversight and micromanagement into school restrooms and the burden of proof in school disciplinary hearings, etc. They are all worth it because, thanks to BHO, we have finally put the great race question behind us once and for all. There are no “WHITES ONLY” signs left anywhere in America, not even on the door to the Oval Office, so we can finally put our racial obsessions to rest and focus on the “content of our character” as that great paragon of good character MLK instructed us. This is why old white lady Hillary Clinton must be our next President, because what family other than the Clintons has the character to occupy the White House?

* If you’re taking flack, you’re over the target, part 592:

Mexico fights back against ‘The Clown’

“What we found out is, again, that the image in general terms of Mexico was quite undervalued or more specifically out of date,” he said. “The image of the contributions of Mexicans and Mexican Americans was damaged and undervalued. And there was no clear image of the importance of the bilateral relationship. That’s when the Mexican government decided that, again, we need to do something.”

The contributions of Mexicans and Mexican-Americans? Help me out here, I’m drawing a blank…

For nearly a year, Mexican officials have chafed at Trump’s inflammatory comments, including his pledges to deport millions of undocumented immigrants and to build a “great, great wall” along the southern border — and to have Mexico pay for it. Just last week, Trump drew scorn when he tweeted “I love Hispanics!” along with a photo of himself eating a “taco bowl” on Cinco de Mayo.

Of course, the scorners can’t exactly explain their scorn.

While U.S. lawmakers from southern border states have been trying to reassure their Mexican counterparts (mindful of Mexico’s enormous importance to U.S. trade)

Which is more enormous, Mexico’s importance to America’s trade, or America’s importance to Mexican trade? To ask is to answer.

Carreño outlined to POLITICO a multi-layered initiative to burnish Mexico’s image. The plans, some of which are already launched, include greater use of traditional and social media, increased cultural outreach through Mexican consulates, and strengthened ties to American business and civil society groups.

As soon as we build that list of important Mexican and Mexican-American contributors, maybe Carreno can use it to recruit them all to his campaign. The biggest Mexican names that spring to my mind are all leaders of drug cartels. Maybe “el chapo” can help.

Peter Schechter, director of the Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center at the Atlantic Council, said Mexicans are stunned to find themselves “the centerpiece of a nativist rhetoric that basically holds them as symbols of all that is wrong with our immigration policy, with our trade policy.”
“Do they feel ransacked? Absolutely. Do they feel this has come out of nowhere? Absolutely. Do they feel that not enough Americans stood up and try to counter-punch and try to explain what the realities of the relationship are? Yes,” said Schechter, who has extensive contacts in the Mexican government.

Well, they’re always welcome in Mexico. Given Mexico’s “enormous importance,” that should be consolation enough.

What does it say about Mexico, when keeping tens of millions of their own citizens in a foreign country is so important to the Mexican gov’t that they’re reshuffling their whole foreign policy apparatus? Anything good?

If they want their image to be more up-to-date, maybe they should put an emphasis on beheadings. That’s a relatively new Mexican trend.

Posted in America, Journalism, New York Times | Comments Off