The Ferguson Effect Is Real

Steve Sailer writes:

But the government’s strategy has been more sophisticated than I anticipated in 1999. Crack was so apocalyptic that the government seems to have been following a multimodal drug war strategy that has been pretty effective:

– Come down extremely hard with imprisonment on drugs that make people more violent, like cocaine.

– Err on the side of downer drugs that make people more passive, like heroin

– Err on the side of abuse of legal drugs, like prescription painkillers

– Err on the side of a multiplicity of drugs so that we don’t get back to a situation like crack cocaine in 1990 or powder cocaine in 1980.

COMMENTS:

* “Well, of course, civil rights did engender a crime wave, a giant one that did horrific damage to much of urban America…”

For something to catch on, it needs a term, a word, or a meme.

The phenom should be called ‘rampage’ or some such thing.

A word that will catch on. Once it catches on, it becomes reality.

It’s like the term ‘Jim Crow’ sums up so much about US history.

* One thing my relatives in law enforcement always stress is that the “Ferguson effect” on law enforcement officers doesn’t have to be very large to produce very big changes. It’s not like the cops are just abandoning the streets — it’s just little stuff here and there, giving a pass to some random knucklehead they would have stopped and hassled a few years ago. Cops catch a surprising number of scary, dangerous guys just by stopping sketchy-looking goofballs who are causing some minor disturbance but otherwise not threatening anyone, because (as the “racist” Broken Windows theory predicts) people who have trouble following the rules in big things also have trouble following the rules about little things. Thus, a lot of officers all easing up at the same time can have a huge effect, even if each individual officer is only making the smallest of changes.

* The three cities that had seen the biggest increases in murder “all seem to have falling populations, higher poverty rates, and higher unemployment than the national average,” the Brennan Center report concluded. “Economic deterioration of these cities could be a contributor to murder increases.”

Rosenfeld, a professor of criminology at the University of Missouri St Louis and the chair of a National Academy of Sciences roundtable on crime trends, said the Brennan Center’s focus on the economic roots of violence was not enough to explain “why homicide increased as much as it did in these cities in a one-year period”.

With liberals, the model has to be twisted to meet the narrative. Here it’s economic deterioration and in an earlier study gun ownership rates where a key factor behind homicide. The narrative must be protected.

Now watch how ThinkProgress lied by omission:

The largest study of gun violence in the United States, released Thursday afternoon, confirms a point that should be obvious: widespread American gun ownership is fueling America’s gun violence epidemic.

The study, by Professor Michael Siegel at Boston University and two coauthors, has been peer-reviewed and is forthcoming in the American Journal of Public Health. Siegel and his colleagues compiled data on firearm homicides from all 50 states from 1981-2010, the longest stretch of time ever studied in this fashion, and set about seeing whether they could find any relationship between changes in gun ownership and murder using guns over time.

Here’s the study. Now, I dare you to click on Table 3 and Table 2 to see which factor is the single largest predictor of firearm homicide.

So back to the question at hand. What might be the demographic effects on a city arising from a falling population? Might that increase the proportion of the black population? Or are blacks the first to flee thus leaving whites in the city and increasing the proportion of white? Look at the influence of income inequality from the Seigel study and compare to the influence of the percent of city which is black. The Brennan Center turns its focus on “economic deterioration” but I’m not sure how they instrumentalize that variable. A good proxy would be an increasing gini index measure but this is nowhere near as powerful as race, especially when we measure in terms of Standard Deviation and thus capture the effect of concentration of black social dysfunction.

The “Ferguson Effect” is going to have a greater impact in cities with high black concentrations than in cities with low black representation, so police in two cities with different demographics, acting on the same reluctance to be the next star of a viral video are going to end up with different effect size outcomes in terms of homicides. High concentrations of blacks need a stronger hand to keep them in line and this pays off, as pre-Ferguson homicide rates indicate.

The social factor conditions listed in the quote create almost a perfect storm for changing the demographics of a city towards one where black concentrations are going to be the factor which explodes the homicide rate and it is precisely these conditions which require a heavy handed police presence to keep a lid on things.

A good test for the question of whether economic deterioration is the key factor behind the rise in homicides is to find white communities which have suffered the same degree of economic deterioration as these cities which have experienced a rise in post-Ferguson homicides and see if there has been a commensurate rise in their homicide rate for it seems the police all across the nation are pulling back due to the scape-goating which is being focused on them.

* Why are crime and murder rates even higher in Jamaica which has almost no white population?

* How much of the post-crack decline in violence is due to the selective pressure of widespread violence that took thousands of criminally prone and violent people out of circulation? Could there be a similar effect after a few years of elevated violence in the cities mentioned above?

There are occasionally innocent bystanders involved, but in my experience most of the violence is pretty targeted, and it’s usually active rivals not some person who is only tangentially involved in drug or gang activity.

* My guess is that the early 1990s peak of bad guys shooting bad guys and bad guys going to prison for shooting bad guys contributed a lot to the late 1990s decline in crime. It also instructed the next generation that being a crack dealer wasn’t as great as it sounded in NWA tracks.

* Why should White cops risk their lives (and their families’ lives in the event of a media shitstorm) to prevent black criminals from killing other black criminals?

* What is the problem with criminals shooting other criminals? I am fine with the murder rate being very high in black areas so long as they stay out of my area. If they do not want the dwindling police resources in my city to stop them from murdering each other, I see no problem with that. I just wish we would airdrop birth control and set up more Planned Parenthood clinics. And this brings me to my favorite argument with progressive types.

I invariably get into the HBD theories and how African Americans on average have lower IQs, higher propensity for crime, lower time preference, etc. At some point a few of the people I argue with have came back at me with something to this affect: “So what if you are correct and all these things about blacks are true? What do you suggest we do about it? What is your solution?”

To that I replied “Nothing. There is nothing we as a society can do to change these genetic realities short of eugenics. However, on a personal level, you already build every aspect of your lives as if you believe these facts. You went to high end colleges with few blacks. You work in a company almost completely devoid of blacks. You spend enormous amounts of money to live in areas away from African Americans. Similarly, you will never send your kids to school with many African Americans. And lastly, you chronically avoid African American areas after dark or in contexts that would make you unsafe.

Essentially your lives are lived exclusively away from blacks. This is due to innate differences in intellectual capabilities and out of fear for your safety. That is reality you have chosen and your actions prove you believe what I say whether you want to admit it or not.”

* Sadly, they are not actually looking for the real causes.

If they were they would list these:

1. If some racial group(s) contain a greater proportion of individuals with a (genetic) propensity for violence,

2. And you signal that you will tolerate violence from them,

3. Lethal violence goes up.

* The First 48 should be required viewing for every American. It is not only real life-and-death human drama, but portrays law enforcement and crime in a way that news and analysis just cannot.

Among the many tidbits from that show (in no particular order):
– people will murder over tiny insults
– almost everything in a major city is caught on camera
– criminals do stupid things like attempt to sell back registered cell phones stolen from murder victims
– when criminals are caught reactions vary, but many view being sent to prison for life with the same amount of gravity that I view going for a routine dental exam
– white-on-white homicide is rarer but exactly what stereotypes would predict (domestic disputes and quarrels over women fueled by alcohol)

* The US Virgin Islands has one of the highest homicide rates in the world. High rates of violence are common in Sub-Saharan African descended populations all over the world. In contrast consider Chinese populations in places like Indonesia where the Chinese populations have been subject to often horrific persecution. Nevertheless the Chinese populations of Indonesia have low levels of violence.

* The Ferguson Effect is far more valid in the arena of the black undertow being agitated than it is in the level of law enforcement. What it means is that more cops and more enforcement won’t solve much, what it will take is for the natives to get restful. Or at the very least, for the (((media))) not to amp them up.

Crime rates did increase in St. Louis even before August 9, 2014, and it went up in 2013. But that does not disprove the Ferguson Effect, in fact, it proves it. It’s just that it shows that the Ferguson Effect deserves a different name. The reason for the increases in 2013 and 2014 had to do with another late teens young black man who was news about that time, and he’s suddenly news again: Trayvon Martin. The media whipped up Trayvonmania to help re-elect Obama, and that happened, and a combination of both leading into the start of 2013 was a cue to the undertow that they could start raging out. Trayvon’s father, incidentally, is a native of East St. Louis.

* I have to give Richard Rosenfeld credit for publicly changing his mind, since he’s going against the narrative and thus endangering future prospects for grants, employment, etc. He has some integrity and we see that less and less, especially at the highest level of government. I’m sure our first black president knows that a lot of the things he says about crime and policing are untrue, but he says them anyway. It would be great if he would take a break from chastising the police and mention that blacks should stop committing so much crime, should stop resisting arrest, and should stop bitching about the shooting of Michael Brown, who only got what was coming to him.

* During a recent appearance on the O’Reilly show Patrick Lynch, head of the NYPD Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association (“PBA”) admitted that the adverse publicity that has resulted from events such as Ferguson has had what amounts to a chilling effect on the ability of his people to do their job. Is there any surprise that the criminal element in these neighborhoods has become emboldened.

By the way, I notice that Detroit is not among the top ten cities with the largest percentage increase in homicides. This suggests that Detroit has either suddenly became peaceful or that the crime statisticians have simply thrown in the towel and don’t even bother keeping statistics anymore.

* We’ve always had various studies throughout the years to put blacks under the microscope to see why they are the way they are. It’s usually whites trying out their pet theories such as them suffering from collective lead poisoning and so on. Whenever the occasional black gets consulted it’s usually also standard fare: white society is to blame and send mo’ money. A long time ago an old timer explained it to me this way: ‘they is what they is, they does what they does’. Well, it’s true, this is what they are and this is what they do. It’s just that whites don’t care for that, tribal warfare doesn’t mesh well with a modern society so they’re always agonizing over how to turn blacks into carbon-copy whites. Can’t be done.

* “The people dying are almost entirely black and Latino men,” he said.”

Your blog is 99% despair/rage porn, Steve, but once in awhile you share some good news with us. Thanks.

* I know you’re being facetious but they’re really on the horns of a dilemma: a) accept aggressive policing that will make life safer for the vast majority of blacks and save measurable young black lives, while accepting that from time to time a black – usually in the commission of a felony – will be killed by (probably white) police; or, b) persist in exposing police to infamy for properly doing their jobs. The Shaun King best of both worlds solution is unobtainable because he wants to roast police for doing their jobs when there is a bad outcome arising from black criminality. White cops (or cops of any race for that matter) offering their lives up for the sake of racial harmony in deadly conflicts with violent black criminals is probably not in the cards either.

The reality is that the toothpaste can’t be put back in the tube at this point because the BLM agitation and crucifixion of good cops doing their jobs is coming from the Eye of Soros, and it will not abate regardless of whether it is responsible for the deaths of black men because it is politically useful.

* I think we ought to go one step further and just segregate the entire white population. Make them live in their own towns, attend their own schools and work at their own businesses.

* Yeah, that’ll teach’em. Make them live with only other white people. See how they like that. No asians, no blacks, no browns. Only white folks. None of that vibrant diversity that makes the rest of the USA so enjoyable and prosperous. Truly this punishment fits the crime.

* I’m of the opinion that the 1994 Violent Crime Act was largely responsible for the decrease in violent crime – Federalizing crimes and providing mandatory minimums (30 year prison terms in Federal Court where they’re served) meant taking criminal All Stars off the field for the remainder of their careers. Also, the Federal penitentiary system allows you to house a NYC armed crack dealer in Terre Haute, Indiana where he can’t easily run his business from within the jail. That probably also had a similar effect that concerted law enforcement pressure had on organized crime – the more able and cunning criminals having been caught and incarcerated, their successors usually dip in quality making them easier to catch. You do this enough and the criminal organization that remains is a shadow of its former self. In a few generations, instead of controlling Union pension funds and skimming from casinos, they’re stealing box trucks full of frozen turkeys and women’s polyester sweatpants.

Charts of violent crime clearly show a peak in and around 1994 and significant reduction thereafter.

* And why is all black Haiti such a total basket case? It has virtually zero whites.
Why do blacks in Canada and England have the same high rates of violence and crime when there was no history of slavery or segregation in either country?

* Lawrence Auster once commented that if liberals/progressives were to write their own holy book, phrases like “And God said….” or “It is written that….” would be replaced with “Studies show…..”

* It’s not just violent crime that’s rising.

California Ballot Measure Blamed for Shoplifting Jump

“It’s just pretty much open season,” Lutz said. “They’ll pick the $800 unit and just grab it and run out the door.”

Anything below $950 keeps the crime a misdemeanor — and likely means the thieves face no pursuit and no punishment, say retailers and law enforcement officials. Large retailers including Safeway, Target, Rite Aid and CVS pharmacies say shoplifting increased at least 15 percent, and in some cases, doubled since voters approved Proposition 47 and ended the possibility of charging shoplifting as a felony with the potential for a prison sentence.

* A thug rapper in prison named Prince Dracula claims he is Prince’s biological son. His prison sentence ends in 2020.

If a paternity test proves this Dindu Nuffin is Prince’s biological son, it certainly adds fuel to the theory that the vast majority of affluent Blacks have family members who are part of the Black underclass, just like in The Fresh Prince Of Bel Air. Even Hussein Obama has family members who are part of the Black underclass.

Not too many affluent Blacks come from 100 percent blue blood wealthy families.

On the flip side most affluent Whites do not have family members who are part of the White underclass. Not as many Fresh Prince Of Bel Air cases among affluent Whites.

* Illustrious gatekeepers of our reigning narrative – those socially pure, spiritually corrosive lies we’re supposed to pretend to believe – take another hit. Media and academia really needed a winner here, and – POWEE! They certainly, certainly could have used a good, old fashioned See, Conservatives Really ARE Nazis study this year of all others. Now… Another Righteous Spin fail. One more denial dependent on us covering our ears and singing la-la and the whole, shabby empire of certitude will crumble to dust, be eaten by oceans.

* How does Orange County remain a Republican stronghold when Whites are the Minority?

It is slightly democratic voting for president, so not really a stronghold. Half the hispanics are not citizens and the half that are citizens are too young to vote or not registered or not interested.

Asians vote at very low rates too, and when they do OC Asians are fairly Republican since they assimilate toward the local elite, which in OC is white Republican. A pretty high percentage of OC Asians are Christians from Vietnam, Korea, or Philippines.

You combine all these factors and OC’s 44% white population are probably 75% of actual voters, or even 80% in off-elections.

For local offices, suburban so-cal whites block vote for Republicans when the dems nominate a non-white. Most of the white out-migration has been in the bottom half of the economic spectrum, and partially replaced with well educated whites. So you end up with a white core that votes in very high numbers. I am a permanent vote by mail voter so I never miss an election.

* A classic example of hispanics in California not voting is that the Compton mayor and city counsel are still 100% black, even though the city as of 2010 65% hispanic, 32% black, and 1% white. By now it could easily be 70% hispanic.

* I go out of my way to not reveal where public figures live precisely. For example, I rewrote a posting about news stories about Carlos Slim putting his New York mansion up for sale for $80 million to reveal only that it was in Manhattan, even though it’s one of the most prominent addresses in America.

My thinking on this goes back to John Lennon’s assumption that it was safe in the late 1970s to mention in interviews that he lived in The Dakota.

* The biggest single year jump in homicides in recent decades before 2015 was 12% in 1990 at the peak of the Crack Wars, so 16+% in 2015 is huge (although that’s only being measured in 56 big cities, so nationally it’s probably a little lower).

* A friend works at Old Navy and says pretty much what this article says. Thieves make a move on her store every freaking day. Jump and run, hide it in the bag, pull it off the rack and say you’re returning something without a receipt, conceal it in the bottom of a stroller. The employees are not allowed to confront and the cops are called constantly.

I just went to a neighborhood meeting about some local crap and I have to say I feel sorry for the officers. They have to deal with the same criminals and bad actors over and over again. Then, the homeowners are bitching at them to get rid of these people. Really they’re caught in a vice squeeze by the liberals in charge and the citizens who want good neighborhoods.

Question: are there any people out there who want law and order as well as welfare handouts? I don’t mean the old folks entitlements. I mean the food stamps, medicaid, cheap housing, WIC, EITC, and such. I understand why people want free stuff, but I don’t get why they want criminals roaming around and crappy neighborhoods. Maybe they’re the same group of people.

Posted in Blacks, Crime, Drugs | Comments Off on The Ferguson Effect Is Real

When the Wrong Are Right

Ross Douthat seems a tad reactionary here:

THE rise of Donald Trump, and with him a white-identity politics more explicit than anything America has seen in decades, has created an interesting division on the political left — over the question of what, if anything, liberal politics ought to offer to people who seem bigoted.

On the one hand there are liberals determined to regard Trumpism as almost exclusively motivated by racial and cultural resentments, with few legitimate economic grievances complicating the morality play. From this perspective, the fact that Trump’s G.O.P. has finally consolidated, say, a once-Democratic area like Appalachia is almost a welcome relief: At last all the white racists are safely in the other party, and we don’t have to cater to them anymore.

On the other hand, there are left-wingers who regard Trump’s support among erstwhile Democrats as a sign that liberalism has badly failed some of its natural constituents, and who fear that a Democratic coalition that easily crushes Trump without much white working-class support will simply write off their struggles as no more than the backward and bigoted deserve.

I like how the left-wing gadfly Fredrik deBoer framed this issue: “What do you owe to people who are guilty of being wrong?” It’s a question for liberals all across the Western world to ponder, given the widening gulf between their increasingly cosmopolitan parties and an increasingly right-leaning native working class.

But as a conservative, I would add another question: What happens if the bigoted sometimes get things right?

Don’t worry, this isn’t a setup for my slow reconciliation with the candidacy of Donald Trump. Rather, it’s a warning against organizing your politics around antibigotry alone, and assuming that just because there are racists or nativists or xenophobes on the other side of a policy argument your side must be right.

Here are a few pertinent examples, from the recent past to the present day.

For decades following the 1960s, liberals insisted that the Republican Party’s tough-on-crime rhetoric wasn’t really about crime at all; it was a barely coded appeal to racists, a transference of white supremacist politics from “segregation now, segregation forever” to paranoia about Willie Horton.

Tough-on-crime rhetoric did indeed play on racial fears; lots of white bigots did vote for law-and-order Republicans. But the rhetoric also played on fears of the actual immense crime wave sweeping the United States, a wave that liberal governance failed miserably to arrest or roll back. And for a long time, elite opinion was so determined not to give white bigots any aid and comfort, so determined not to take racists’ side in any way, that it ignored or minimized the actual policy problem, the actual crisis at its door…

If bigots are for it, we’re against it. It’s a powerful credo. But there’s always a danger that by following it too far, you end up being against reality itself.

Posted in Crime, Donald Trump | Comments Off on When the Wrong Are Right

Steve Sailer: Video: The Hug Thug Slugs Another Young Woman in Times Square

Steve Sailer writes:

…places like Times Square and Hollywood Boulevard are full of people hustling for tips from tourists who, unlike Jermaine, go to the trouble of dressing up as comic book character. Most of them don’t cause too much trouble. But occasionally the Hulk Smash urge takes over. For example, from the L.A. Times in 2007:

The buzz on Hollywood Boulevard on Friday was over the Chewbacca who police say crossed over to the dark side in front of hundreds of tourists at Grauman’s Chinese Theatre.

LAPD officers arrested “Star Wars” street performer Frederick Evan Young, 44, of Los Angeles in his furry brown wookiee costume Thursday on a charge of misdemeanor battery for allegedly head-butting a tour guide who complained about Young’s treatment of two visitors from Japan.

The incident — witnessed by Superman and other impersonators — is the latest clash outside the landmark cinema between visitors and performers dressed as movie and cartoon characters. They collect tips from tourists who pose for pictures and watch them perform in front of the theater, where generations of stars have placed their footprints in concrete.

Tourists have complained that some costumed characters turn abusive when they refuse to pay them to pose for pictures. Two years ago, actors dressed as superhero Mr. Incredible, Elmo the Muppet and the dark-hooded character from the movie “Scream” were arrested for aggressive begging. More recently, an actor portraying slasher movie favorite Freddie Krueger was taken into custody for allegedly stabbing another man, although no charges were filed.

COMMENTS:

* There was a notorious Elmo in Times Square a few years ago who would go on foul-mouthed anti-Semitic rants in between taking pictures and giving hugs. He was arrested several times but would reappear.

* Minimum sentencing guidelines and more prison beds tend to reduce this kind of thing: Only a small percentage of the population is this out-of-control. They’re fairly easy to detect, arrest and convict. When they’re warehoused in prison crime goes down.

* In the case of Jermaine, as John Derbyshire as noted, the present de facto religion is Negro-worship. Doing something about Jermaine would require recognition that he is a periodically slightly-daft, but dangerously violent Negro, which is impossible given present cultural standards. So some young women have to suffer some periodic serious, although almost-never, life threatening injuries. It’s just a sacrifice to the tribal gods.

* I can’t help thinking of the guy who was killed in Union Square a few years ago.

When you sucker punch people in the head on a city street, there’s a chance you will end up killing them.

* Lee Kuan Yew called busking ‘disguised begging’. Busking is poorly disguised mugging for a certain type of guy.

* In DC aka second chance city, even violent criminals are treated with kid gloves which leads to predictable results.

Washington Post:

The alleged perpetrator, 21-year-old Antwon Durrell Pitt, had an extensive criminal history, including eight arrests in four years and a robbery conviction. Three times, he was sentenced under laws designed to promote leniency and second chances for inexperienced adult offenders. In two of those cases, he was sentenced under the District’s Youth Rehabilitation Act, a 1980s-era law aimed at “deserving” offenders under the age of 22.


Pitt’s case shows that such laws, combined with lax enforcement by key federal agencies, can give many chances to violent offenders despite repeated criminal behavior and the failure to abide by terms of release, according to a Washington Post review of court records, transcripts and probation reports.

* Here is the voice of one of Obama’s sons, from the comments on the local NBC station website story:

“These motherf**ers dont care about any rules & regs the city council just put in place & honestly i dont blame them. Personally, i wouldnt had punched the lady in thr face but i wouldve sure as hell had some choice words for her for not tipping me.”

JJ helpfully includes a photo of himself and a link to his Facebook page.

Anyone who visits NY should be wise to the ways of the city and know that nobody really gives you anything for free so that someone offering “Free Hugs” is actually expecting remuneration. NY is a high cost of living place and ain’t nothin’ free. If you are a naive Canadian woman, then JJ and Jermaine will teach you. Maybe JJ is one of the guys in the Elmo suits so he has a professional stake in educating tourists on this charming local custom.

If people thought that they could get away with not paying for these kind of services, it would be really bad for business – word might get out that you could get away without paying. If you bought a hot dog from a vendor and didn’t pay him, he might have the same reaction.

* Although he got off the first 15 or so times that he did this, I think that Jermaine’s luck has just run out. He has attracted the Eye of Sauron and he can no longer slip between the cracks in the legal system. A number of witnesses have come forward from other incidents in which he slugged women. Negroes have #1 privilege in the liberal system but women are not far behind. Even in De Blasio’s NY (Jermaine looks like his son too), I expect this time they will indict him on multiple counts of assault and he will do some time.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Video: The Hug Thug Slugs Another Young Woman in Times Square

The New Failed Messiah-Type Blog

Click here for the blog covering the dark side of the Orthodox world: “Uncovering the crimes, misdeeds and scandals of the Haredi/Hasidic community. Following in the footsteps of Failed Messiah.”

Chaim Amalek writes: “Rodef alert! Hashem, send us moshiach already so that the goyim will stop persecuting Torah Yidden for living the Way G-d commanded us to live on Mt. Sinai, including our felty hats.”

Posted in Orthodoxy | Comments Off on The New Failed Messiah-Type Blog

No Kin Of Mine

When O.J. Simpson was acquitted of murder, much of white America woke up to the fact that blacks lived in a very different moral universe from them. For most blacks, as with many Jews and Muslims and East Asians, tribal loyalty is automatic. Tribes have an in-group vs. out-group morality. You take care of your in-group and who cares about the out-group. That’s why there are so many tribalists in financial scandals.

About the only group that does not practice a dual morality are the WASPs. That’s why they produce the best countries.

As America has moved away from its Anglo heritage, it has become more corrupt.

ESPN: “Rudy Macklin’s jersey is hanging from the rafters at LSU’s Pete Maravich Assembly Center, and for good reason: He is the school’s all-time leading rebounder and second-leading scorer. Macklin led the Tigers to the 1981 Final Four in Philadelphia, where an injured finger hampered him in a semifinal loss to Indiana. Back then, the NCAA Tournament included a third-place game, and that’s where the trouble started for Macklin. Just before the consolation game against Virginia, President Ronald Reagan was shot, and after the loss, Macklin was asked if the news might have affected the team. His widely-reported response — “He’s no kin of mine” — was so blown out of proportion that he feared for his life. In this documentary, directed by Marc Kinderman, Macklin talks about the fight to restore his honor.”

MSN: Brazilian admits killing 41 people [white women] ‘for fun’

A Brazilian man accused of stabbing a woman to death in a Rio suburb has confessed to have murdered 41 people, almost all of them women, “for the fun of it,” police said Thursday.

“He wanted to kill women — white women, not black ones. He followed the victims, studying them closely before committing the crimes,” said police commissioner Pedro Henrique Medina from the northern suburb of Nova Iguacu.

The man was identified as Sailson Jose das Gracas, a 26-year-old whom police describe as a psychopath.

They said they were checking his statements against past investigations, and so far they tally with the evidence.

Gracas says he murdered 37 women, three men and a two-year-old child over a nine-year killing spree, explaining he killed the child because he feared it would cry and attract neighbors’ attention.

“I observed them, I studied them. I waited for a month, sometimes a week, depending on the place. I tried to ascertain where they lived, what their families were like. I kept watch on their houses and then after a while went there at dawn, waited for my chance and entered,” broadcaster Globo’s G1 news portal quoted Gracas as saying.

He explained he started out as a petty thief.

“At 17, I killed the first woman and that gave me a buzz. I kept on doing it and I enjoyed it,” he said, adding on one occasion a couple, Cleusa Balbina and her former husband Jose Messias, contracted him to kill someone for money. The pair are now under arrest.

Gracas said he used a gun in contract killings but strangled his other victims.

He planned his crimes meticulously, wearing a rain jacket in order to conceal his identity and gloves in order not to leave fingerprints, adding he became addicted to murder.

“When I wasn’t killing someone I got uptight. I would pace up and down at home. Killing calmed me down.

“I’d kill someone and then would think about the victim for two or three months. After that, I’d go off hunting” for another victim, Gracas revealed.

“I don’t feel remorse — if I go to jail for 10, 15, 20 years, then as soon as I get out I’ll do the same thing all over again,” he insisted.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on No Kin Of Mine

Are Jews A Race?

Comment: Yes, but it was also not uncommon to refer to the “English race,” “German race,” “Italian race,” etc. as well as the broader “White race” in that era. With regard to the population genetic evidence, discussing Jews as a race ignores that there are subgroups among Jews that have different genetic histories. Considering some of the larger Jewish subgroups, the recent work of Shai Carmi and collaborators has shown that Ashkenazi Jews are predominantly a mixture of Middle Eastern and Southern European genetic components with a small amount of East European admixture. Yemeni Jews appear to be descended from local converts.

Sephardic Jews are not and were never restricted to North Africa. After the Iberian expulsions, some Sephardic Jews went to Italy and the Ottoman Empire as well as to North Africa. Indigenous Middle Eastern Jewish populations, in modern parlance sometimes referred to as Mizrahim instead of Sephardim, existed outside of North Africa as well, for example in Iran and Iraq.

The strongest evidence for distinct Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry comes from autosomal DNA studies that assay thousands of loci throughout the genome rather than uniparental marker haplotypes. However, it is also now clear that Ashkenazi Jews are the result of admixture (predominantly Middle Eastern and Southern European with a minor East European component). The admixture and subsequent inbreeding tend to cause Ashkenazi Jewish samples to form their own genetic cluster in the standard statistical analyses of the genetic data. The same effect is seen to some extent when other admixed groups like Uighurs are analyzed genetically. But even regions within the UK are genetically differentiable by autosomal DNA analysis.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Are Jews A Race?

Most American Jews Are Married To Non-Jews

Comment: 58% of married Jews are married to a non-Jew.

20% of Jews married to a non-Jew say they will raise their kids Jewish.
25% of Jews married to a non-Jew say they will raise their kids “partially” Jewish.
37% of Jews married to a non-Jew say they will raise their kids without any Jewish tradition at all.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Most American Jews Are Married To Non-Jews

JTA: Jewish groups unite to defend Muslims from discrimination

If you found your bedroom filled with poisonous snakes, who would you hate? The snakes or the people who put them there? The Jewish groups in the following story want to fill your community with poisonous snakes. From many a non-Muslim perspective in the West, Muslim immigrants in your country are poison, just as from a Muslim perspective, the Jewish state of Israel is a poison in their midst and no churches or synagogues can be allowed in Saudi Arabia (and non-Muslims have to be segregated).

The friends of my enemies are my enemies. How do Arabs and Muslims feel about their fellow Arabs and Muslims who praise the beauty of the Jewish state of Israel? I suspect that normal Arabs and Muslims would rightly think of them as traitors. How many Arab and Muslim groups are there protesting hatred against the Jewish state of Israel?

For more than 200 years, Jews in the West have consistently sided with the coalition of the fringe against the white Christian core. You rarely find large numbers of Jews in any movement that seeks to strengthen the white Christian core against the fringe.

There is nothing in Torah that mandates how Jews should rally on behalf of other minorities. The Torah is strangely silent on civil rights legislation in gentile countries. The Torah is strangely silent about the great evils of Islamophobia, homophobia, lookism, sexism, bigotry and discrimination. The Jews who are most passionate about such things are the least Jewish, while Jews who are the most Jewish (traditional orthodox Jews) do not care about civil rights and usually vote right-wing.

Many, perhaps most Orthodox Jews in America, would be glad if all the Muslims and blacks around them disappeared. Most Jews wish that all Palestinians disappear.

A lot of Jews tell me that I am the only person they know who loves Donald Trump.

JTA: Jewish groups unite to defend Muslims from discrimination

A dozen American organizations team up to support legislation thwarting proposed ban on Muslims entering the US.

From a bid to overcome resistance to building a mosque in New Jersey to defending a Muslim student at a military academy who wants to wear a hijab, Jewish groups this week joined efforts to stop anti-Muslim discrimination.

Nearly a dozen Jewish groups are also backing legislation against banning entry to Muslims, prompted by a proposal for such a ban by presidential candidate Donald Trump.

The American Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists joined the Becket Fund, a conservative group that advocates for religious liberty, in a friend of the court brief filed Wednesday on behalf of Muslims who have been blocked from building a mosque in Basking Ridge, New Jersey.

Another of the groups backing the Muslim community in the mosque case is the Interfaith Coalition on Mosques, a group convened in 2010 by the Anti-Defamation League to support Muslim communities seeking to build mosques. “The Islamic Society of Basking Ridge was held to a different standard than every other house of worship in the community, and that is simply unacceptable,” Joshua Cohen, ADL’s regional director, said in a statement.

Also Wednesday, the American Jewish Committee called on The Citadel, a military college in South Carolina, to allow a Muslim student to wear a hijab.

The college president, Lt. Gen. John Rosa, said that deviations from the school’s uniform could detract from leadership training, the Washington Post reported Wednesday, adding that the college otherwise remains committed to diversity.

“The Citadel should reverse its hijab ban as part of its commitment to preparing its students for leadership positions in military service and civilian careers,” Robert Silverman, AJC’s director of Muslim-Jewish relations, said in a statement.

The statement noted that Jewish groups, including the AJC, backed legislation passed in 1988 that allowed servicemen to wear religious garb based on litigation brought in the 1980s by a Jewish Air Force officer who wanted to wear a kippah.

Separately, more than 70 members of the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday introduced legislation that would prohibit religion as a criterion for banning entry to visitors, immigrants or refugees.

Broadsides against Muslims by Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, and other Republican candidates sparked the legislation.

The legislation is backed by at least 11 Jewish groups, including umbrella bodies for the Reform, Conservative and Reconstructionist movements and the public policy umbrella, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, among the more than 30 faith groups that have expressed support for it.

COMMENTS SECTION:

* Shouldn’t these Jew Socialists be focused on helping indigent Jewish elderly in Brooklyn and donating to Maimonides Hospital?

* Jewish groups should stick to discussing Judaism and fighting for the Jewish people. They should quit pretending Islam is the same as Judaism, and actually learn about the doctrines of the Koran which teaches that the Jews are the most corrupt and worst enemies of the true believers, i.e., Muslims. Jewish groups should be confronting Islamic Jew hatred, not foolishly fighting for Islam.

* These self hating Jews should unite to protect Israelis, fellow Jews, Christians, and any non Muslims from Muslim discrimination, It seems to me that Muslims do most of the killing and discriminating in this world. They also do the most whining about being discriminated against.

* Yet no Jews are allowed in any Arab country…where are the muslims protesting that…Liberal Jews are lost in space.

* Sorry liberal jewish groups – but you do NOT have my support or that of many others involved in the mideast conflict. Muslims are NOT welcome in the West and neither I nor anyone else I know support them until they learn how to act like civilized humans on many fronts, including the acceptance of the rights of non-muslims, treatment of non-muslims in the mideast as equals, acceptance of Israel, etc.

Posted in Islam, Jews | Comments Off on JTA: Jewish groups unite to defend Muslims from discrimination

Remembering Jewish White Flight from L.A. Public Schools

The number of black kids in the schools I went to (prior to college, and even then it was never more than about 5% at UCLA in 1988-1989) was never more than about 2%.

One of the marks of Orthodox Jews is that more than 90% of them send their kids to Orthodox Jewish schools.

In ninth grade, I had a two-hour commute to and from school. It was miserable and the worst school year of my life. I had hives every night. I failed two classes (Spanish, Algebra) my first semester at Forest Lake Christian School. Then I transferred to Placer High School so I could take journalism classes and my grades improved to better than a B average (without taking any honors courses).

Steve Sailer writes:

I’ve mentioned many times that, in my experience growing up in Los Angeles’s San Fernando Valley in the 1960s and 1970s, white flight from the public schools was pretty much Jewish flight. It can be dated fairly precisely to 1978 to avoid integration due to the mandatory school busing imposed by an ACLU lawsuit on the giant Los Angeles Unified School District.

Why? Back then, Catholics tended to go to Catholic schools, and Protestants lived in independent school districts like Pasadena, San Marino, and in Orange County.

Moreover, San Fernando Valley Jews were highly enthusiastic about public schooling. One of my older memories is hearing from my Jewish teammates on my baseball team at the local park that Catholic schools were kind of un-American. Jews went to public schools to demonstrate their commitment to civic Americanism.

But then, very quickly, they stopped.

Yet that massive historical example that happened 38 years ago at the heart of the world capital of the entertainment industry has largely been lost in the mists of time. Thus, when 27-year-old Atlantic interns denounce all those horrible white people who white flighted away from integrated schools, they tend to picture evil white Southerners who were probably secret Klansmen, meatheaded Catholic ethnics, and snobby WASPs who wouldn’t let their great-grandfathers into their anti-Semitic country clubs, but they don’t picture people much like themselves.

So, I figured I’d better post a rare 21st Century article documenting that I’m not just hallucinating all this history. From the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles seven years ago:

A Brief History of Jews in Public Schools
by Rachel Heller
Posted on Nov. 30, 2009 at 2:01 pm

With the many LAUSD schools having spotty reputations, and given the array of private schools to choose from, Jewish support for Los Angeles public schools in recent years has been at best tepid. But that wasn’t always the case.

Jews in L.A. have had a long and textured relationship with the public education system. From the 1890s, when the city first established elementary and high school districts, through to the 1960s, public education was a mainstay of the Jewish community.

But when school demographics began to shift as working class Latino and African American populations burgeoned, many Jewish families pulled out of public schools and migrated to the private realm.

The Jewish exodus from LAUSD reached its peak during the desegregation movement of the 1970s. After the ACLU filed a lawsuit in 1963 to end segregation in L.A. schools, the LAUSD board created voluntary integration programs, introducing magnet schools and giving district schools the option of busing students from lower-performing facilities to higher performing schools. In 1976, the California Supreme Court charged state school districts with enforcing integration. In response, two years later the L.A. school board began a sweeping mandatory busing program that would reassign more than 60,000 students, transferring minority children from downtown and South L.A. to predominantly white schools in the San Fernando Valley and the Westside, and vice versa.

This was a particularly nuts example of the high tide of liberal social engineering since it involved busing kids from the San Fernando Valley over a mountain range — the Santa Monica Mts. / Hollywood Hills — and down to South-Central L.A.

Students often were bused up to an hour away from where they lived, and the move caused a public outcry among both whites and minorities over what many parents saw as “the end of neighborhood schools,” according to former LAUSD school board member David Tokofsky. Racist and classist prejudices also turned some white families away.

In the first year of forced busing, the district lost 25,000 white students, recalled Shel Erlich, the former longtime head of the LAUSD communications office. In the second year, an additional 17,000 left. In 1981, after only three years, California residents voted down all mandatory busing programs and the plan in Los Angeles was suspended.

But the damage had been done – in the late 1970s, Erlich said, the district was about 30 percent white; now, that number hovers below nine percent.

“[Busing] drove a huge number of Jews from the public schools,” said local author and Jewish Journal columnist Bill Boyarsky. “Parents were not comfortable sending their children to a school where their kid might be the only white person in the class.”

Jewish leaders had taken both sides of the busing debate. Educator Jackie Goldberg, who would later win seats on the Los Angeles City Council and the California State Assembly, headed the controversial Integration Project in the late 1970s that pushed for mandatory busing. Activist and later U.S. Congresswoman Bobbi Fiedler, on the other hand, led the vocal Bustop movement in the Valley that fiercely opposed busing and challenged the program in court.

… Private schools flourished; Jewish day schools proliferated in the 1970s and 80s.

So, I wanted to get this on the record because it’s otherwise disappeared down the Memory Hole.

Thus, when the young lady from The Atlantic reads Matthew Weiner, creator of Mad Men, going on and on in interviews about how he could tell there were anti-Semites lurking everywhere in 1981 at ultra-exclusive Harvard-Westlake in the Hollywood Hills (which was then 40% Jewish), she feels a righteous thrill. Meanwhile, it never occurs to her to wonder why Weiner’s parents were paying for him to attend an exclusive school founded by Episcopalians, when just a few years before they would have thought it right and fitting to utilize Los Angeles’s fine public school system. The young lady from The Atlantic could empathize more with the creator of Mad Men more than she can empathize with the Klansmen, Catholic ignoramuses, and the WASP anti-Semite golfers for whom she blames the failure of school integration, but she’s almost never called upon to wonder why Weiner’s Hancock Park parents put him in private school.

It just doesn’t come up. Why would anybody who is professionally interested in the history of white flight from the public schools ever think about something as obscure as America’s second largest school district, which happens to be in the second most televised place in America?

By the way, one of the funnier interviews with Weiner was conducted by David Samuels, who is now being widely denounced by the members of the Obama Administration media echo chamber for inducing Obama speechwriter Ben Rhodes to spill his guts a little too frankly for the Administration’s good.

But Samuels does this to everybody, especially fellow Jews: he’s supersmart about getting inside his subject’s head and getting him to talk about his motivations that he normally keeps under wraps.

COMMENTS:

* Investment tip: buy within walking distance of an Orthodox or Sephardic temple for a steady stream of buyers.

* Diversity is fine when it occurs naturally and with the consent of all parties. Forced, artificial diversity is not “enriching,” it’s insane.

* Still, these posts by Steve are worthwhile. They just might help remind people in the megaphone media that this is a two-way conversation now and they might want to dial down their gas-lighting game. Fifty years of unrelenting guilt-tripping and taunting can get on the collective nerves of others.

* Jews are considered white when doing so helps Jews, and nonwhites when doing so helps Jews. When Jews do things that are not kosher under societal mores (like fleeing areas flooded with undesirable ethnic groups) it’s called “white flight.” Yet Jews simultaneously hold up the Holocaust narrative as The Worst Thing In Human History and use it as the primary excuse for undermining most non-Israeli nationalism.

* Rapper Ice Cube of N.W.A. was bussed from South Central to attend high school more than an hour away in Woodland Hills. Interestingly, Woodland Hills educated Ice Cube left NWA to unleash a series of controversial, anti-Semitic tracks. Ice Cube brought us The Predator album so there were some good things to come out of LA bussing.

* I heard a white guy tell about his experiences with being bused in grade school back in the early 70s. Every year he was sent to a different one, and he always had to deal with being the new kid in class, the outsider. Every year he was torn away from the few friends he’d made the previous year. He soon quit making friends at all because he figured out he’d never be allowed to keep them.

It was the sort of environment where a blazing extrovert might have thrived, but he wasn’t an extrovert, and he says he found it traumatic. He wanted stability, not to be someone else’s social experiment. He said he doubted he added much of any value to the lives of the black kids whose schools he was sent to, and the busing didn’t do him any good, either.

* I think anyone who thinks White America is going to wake up and fight back, should take a long look at Busing in the 1970s and 1980s.

Almost no one ever voted for Busing. It was imposed on people by the courts and the bureaucracy. The Civil rights bill was supposed to ban government mandated segregation, not require Government enforced desegregation across entire school districts.

Reagan campaigned against it, but the republicans would never pass a bill against it. Howard Metzenbaum would get up and say “I’ll filibuster any anti-busing bill” and the Senator majority leader Dole/Baker would go “sorry, we just can’t pass a bill”. And that was that.

And people just took it. Most of them, instead of getting mad and fighting, just ran away. Or as Steve wrote put their kids in private school. In effect paying for their kids education twice, once thru taxes, then thru private school fees.

And this was in the 1970s-1980s when supposedly the country was more “racist” and “right-wing”.

* That’s a very sad story. For $50 I’ll write the screenplay and we can shop it to Hollywood. From experience though I doubt they’ll be interested.

The better Screenplay would be the story of a disadvantaged minority, say a black kid, who was uplifted by a magnanimous benefactor, say a Jew, who took it upon himself to fight the good fight against WASPy gentiles who stood in the way of this good looking, gifted disadvantaged minority kid.

At this point in story developent we should take a look at casting. I have Dustin Hoffman in mind for the beneficient Yidden and Denzel Washington for the disadvantaged minority boy’s father.

Let’s put the backdrop as contemporary Fergusson Mo or a fictionalized variant. We’ll have a NYT reporter covering the unrest and assuredly signaling virtue to the utmost. This is the angle we’ll use: the story will be told amidst the chaos of BLM with a Charles Blow-type homosexual NYT reporter narrating the unfolding drama.

I work cheap, contact me for the screenplay, I can have it done tonight. We’ll make millions.

* >>>Jewish leaders had taken both sides of the busing debate. Educator Jackie Goldberg, who would later win seats on the Los Angeles City Council and the California State Assembly, headed the controversial Integration Project in the late 1970s that pushed for mandatory busing.

From Wikipedia: “Goldberg is openly lesbian[1] and was a founder member of the California Legislative LGBT Caucus. She is one of three openly gay and Jewish members with Carol Migden, and Mark Leno.”

Not surprised. Radical, Jewish, lesbian with no skin in the game heads the “controversial” project.

* I can tell you from personal experience that being a White-Jewish kid in one of these minority schools really sucks. You get the usual bullying from Black and Hispanic kids, while also receiving ostracism from your fellow Jews cause your parents actually sent you to one of these “ghetto” schools. Unsurprisingly, many of fellow Jews went on to become liberal zealots (a few of them work for groups like the ACLU) while I eventually became an admirer of Pat Buchanan and Paul Gottfried. The Cossacks no longer matter to me…

* I lived for a few years in a city where the local high school was heavily black, but there was an honors program created to keep white kids from fleeing the school entirely. There was a far left Jewish family across the street from us. The dad was (literally) a card-carrying ACLU member. His son got kicked out of the honors program. Instead of going to classes at the same high school with the normal (i.e., mostly black) students, the kid somehow transferred to the neighboring high school which (coincidentally!) was about 95% white.

* I wonder how many white people have lost long-term friendships with black people over what I’d call “the interpersonal ferguson effect,” which could basically be described as the white guy not buying the old-timey black narrative of victimization.

I’m white, and I had to cut one loose lately. I got tired of the old-timey neglected negro narrative. He clung to it like a religion, even though he’s had a pretty successful life, thanks to white folks, and never lifted a finger to help black folks. He’s of the “I got mine, let them get theirs” school of ignoring the people he likes to defend almost unconditionally. His town is all white, as is his significant other, and he loves it. But let him see “12 years a slave” and he turns into Samuel Jackson on a bad day. Just bizarre.

* Ze’ev Chafets wrote about Jewish flight from his native Pontiac and other parts of metro Detroit in Devil’s Night. Most moved nearby. The author moved to Jerusalem. Now that’s flight.

* Robert Weissberg nails it:

If you looked around our cultural landscape and tried to find two groups with different values that venerate different things, who worship at different altars, it is hard to find two groups more different than blacks and Jews. Jews are obsessed with education, blacks destroy it. If you’ve gone to school in the inner city, you know that not only do they hate the idea of learning, but they assault their teachers and physically destroy their schools.

When blacks move into a neighborhood, the first people out are Jews. Jews did not invent white flight but we perfected it. As far as intermarriage and social exchange, there’s almost zero. They just don’t mix. Jews are not into crime. The sorts of things that blacks specialize in — muggings, assaults, rapes — are not a Jewish predilection.

How Jews really relate to blacks is something Jews hardly talked about except when they are amongst themselves. When Jews get together in a safe place and talk about blacks, they will use the term “schvartze.” When you go to Leo Rosten’s Joys of Yiddish, he’s very careful in what he says. With “schvartze”, he becomes tight-lipped. “A black person, a negro.” That does not begin to depict what the term means among Jews. There may be a degree of affection, as in, ‘I hear Mrs. Schwartz got a new schvartze.’

It is not necessarily a negative word. It’s not the same thing as nigger. If you inserted the word ‘nigger’ to achieve some lexiconic variety, Jews would be genuinely offended. There can even be a degree of affection in schvartze. As in, ‘Ahh, I heard Mrs. Schwartz got a new schvartze. Oh, how nice.’”

When you use the term ‘schvartze’, it always implies cognitive inferiority. The mental picture of a stupid black embedded in the term schvartze is true even with pro-civil rights [liberal] Jews… Adding the phrase ‘dumb schvartze’ is superflous, reserved only used for the most egregious stupidity. Invisible baggage likewise includes gullibility, emotional excitability, and a weakness for here-and-now conspicuous consumption. Violence, especially inter-personal, alcohol-induced mayhem, is also associated with schvartze. The image that comes to the mind with Jews when you say ‘schvartze’ is simple-minded, impulsive, easily seduced by trinkets. This is extremely close to the traditional Southern image of blacks, almost identical to what many Southerners would privately say about blacks… This is continually reinforced by daily experience, such as in integrated public schools.

We had a procession of cleaning ladies [in New York]. Growing up, I honestly believed that all black people come from a thing called The Agency. We’d hire black cleaning ladies and invariably they’d steal and drink the liquor and my mother would come back and say, ‘I’m calling up The Agency and getting another.’ Very few Jews of my generation had any other contact. We had a procession of handymen and cleaning people come to my house.

It was always believed that any Jew can ultimately out-smart any schvartze except save being confronted by a demented gunman. Despite immense cultural chasms, Jews held themselves as innately capable of finessing blacks thanks to their superior wits, verbal talent, and a mastery of black psychology. The unmatched success of Jewish ghetto merchants and Jewish civil rights leadership positions proclaim this truth. Even today Jews may secretly brag about their success in beguiling blacks in contentious interpersonal relationships. People sometimes ask me, ‘What did you do when they showed up as a demonstration to your office?’ This happened to me one time. A bunch of angry young blacks came to my office… I said, ‘I just relied on the wisdom of my ancestors. I gave them a little rope-a-dope. I moved around. I said this, I said that. Within half an hour, they were fine. I sold one a suit and several new jewelry and they were happy. They got a deal from Mr. Weissberg.’

Where personal manipulation might fail, the storehouse of survival tactics sufficed exceedingly well. Black pathologies were bearable, especially since most black mayhem was self-inflicted. Jews might even profit from these disorders as merchants or nanny state therapists. Threatened Jews can flee deteriorating neighborhoods, enroll their children in private schools, hire security guards, co-opt black leaders financially, or otherwise escape.

Jews see no conflict between righteously defending black criminals as political prisoners and living in fortress-style buildings.

On the one hand, Jews dread blacks physically. When Jews see blacks walking down the street, they feel tremendous fear. Yet they dutifully pay the danegeld (extortion money).

For most Jews, it is the white goyim who pose the most threat. Contrary fact-based argument fall on deaf ears. Like the schvartzes, the Chinese [and Japanese] are never called goyim.

Blacks are incapable of such well-organized horror [as the Holocaust] unless directed by nefarious whites… A full-scale pogrom is beyond their capacity. Can you imagine blacks systemically rounding up thousands of Jews or even keeping tabs on Jewish neighborhoods? Assess enemies by capabilities, not intentions… The schvartze pose minimal risk. They’re too stupid.

* MORE: Some people seem to think that being Jewish is somehow different than being white, in a racial sense anyways. Do those idiots think that blacks somehow perceive a Jew as being different than a white person? No they don’t. Most Jews are caucasian, yeah they have some distant Middle Eastern origins but most Jews of today have resided in Europe for millennia and are nearly genetically identical to most white Europeans, as far as blacks are concerned they have white skin and practicing the Jewish religion doesn’t exempt them from black racist violence. Jews know that and that’s why they leave when there are too many negroes.

* …the entire point of busing wasn’t “racial equality.” It was to deploy political means to destroy white communities and (heterosexual, male-centered) families. The latter obviously involved removing the locus of familial authority from the male and the home to the state and its female lesbian autocrats. A process that continues, on steroids, to this day.

* The forced integration of schools nationwide was the result of court cases initiated by the American Civil Liberties Union ACLU) which had been under Jewish control since its original gentile founders (Roger Baldwin et.al.) had been purged for opposition to the growing influence of the Communist Party in the organization in the early 1940s.. What occurred in San Francisco in particular during this era of busing is both curious and illustrative . The Jews who pushed for integration through groups like the ACLU must have somehow thought (or known) that they would be excluded from it once it came into effect.

San Francisco, up to the period of this busing, had had three academic high schools: Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, and Lowell. For decades all of these three schools had produced thousands students who were accepted at all sorts of high level universities including places like the Ivy leagues and Stanford. Lowell, one of the three high schools, was a magnet for one particular type of student , Jewish. It was so heavily Jewish that I know of someone who transferred out of Lowell to Lincoln High School in the late 1950s specifically because he claimed that his social life was being curtailed the many Jewish girls there wouldn’t date gentile males. (Interestingly the Jewish males were able to date the much more accepting protestant girls. ) Lowell was in effect a defacto Jewish public high school with large percentages of both Jewish students and teachers.

When busing came around a curious thing happened, It was suddenly decided without any public input that Lowell would henceforth be considered the primary high school for college bound students in the city with strict admission criteria to be instituted while Washington and Lincoln were left to accept the bused students and then be left essentially to their own devices (i.e neglected). In the following years both Lincoln and Washington ended up essentially falling apart academically and becoming more and more violent , disrupted, and ghetto like. Lincoln in particular suffered the most from this neglect. I remember seeing police cars almost constantly were circling it during school hours during this period.

This situation continued for several decades before Jews in particular started to feel the pinch of competition from an increasing number of even more academically motivated Chinese. This resulted in an increasing number of Jews who were no longer able to get into Lowell and whose parents then had to choose between the problem ridden Washington or Lincoln high schools or MUCH much more expensive private schools or (gasp) strict Catholic high schools. The recently arrived Russian Jewish emigres in particular were in a quandary because they were simply unable to pay these private school fees. What to do?

It was only then when a move was made to clean up both Lincoln and Washington High Schools.. This was done by, among other things, instituting far more advanced placement classes there, taught by much better teachers,transferring the worst of the teachers and large scale booting out the worst of the trouble makers by pushing them into the newly set up, so called “charter schools” ( the worst of which are essentially nothing more than crypto reform schools with just as active a police presence.) Lincoln and Washington have apparently finally got their full maintenance budget restored as well. So much for integration. Things have improved greatly since then but Lincoln is particular has never really overcome the problems of the past because the Chinese still hold it in such low repute because of it (very) violent past.

At the same time as the aforementioned changes in the high schools occurred another interesting event happened. With Jewish parents in the main leadership roles, the toniest neighborhood of San Francisco, Pacific Heights, tried to preserve its local public elementary school, Ulysses Grant, from busing. What was interesting was that many of these these very same, very liberal Jewish parents had been among the main financial backers of the ACLU which had pushed busing in the first place. Somehow these Jews thought they they would be spared its effects of integration while only the gentile lumpen proletariat would experience it. What hypocrisy.! These parents tried to prevent the busing of their children by using their considerable financial and political muscle and access to the best legal representation. The ultra liberal San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD). tolerated these uppity white folks for a while but then became irritated. A solution was needed.

The school district suddenly decided to bulldoze down the up-to-now beautifully maintained and stately Grant School. It was did it quickly and thoroughly leaving only a totally vacant lot after the bulldozers left. Not even the smallest remnant of a foundation remained. End of problem. The Pacific Heights students now had no choice but to go to another (thoroughly integrated) public school, right! Not quite. Virtually all of these now school-less students were transferred just as as rapidly to private or Catholic schools. Since then, the wealthiest parents in the city no longer had any vested interest in public school their interest in funding them with additional tax increases suddenly waned significantly. They still don’t send their children to public schools. Just like NYC.

Interesting note: I was driving around provincial France in the early 1980s in a rental car while staying in youth hostels and camping. In a small, remote french village I decided to camp in the local campground. The french girl behind the counter at the office counter there spoke to me in very good idiomatic English.I asked her how she had learned such good English. She replied that she had been an exchange student in the United States the previous year. I asked her where and she replied “San Francisco.” I then asked her what high school she had attended. She replied “Abraham Lincoln.” I asked her what she thought of Abraham Lincoln High School. She summed up her opinion in just four words, “It was very violent.” Nothing else was added. This was the most lasting impression she had about an American school.

Posted in Blacks, Education, Jews, Los Angeles | Comments Off on Remembering Jewish White Flight from L.A. Public Schools

Chaim Amalek: How shall we destroy this man?

Tyson Fury launches foul-mouthed rant about Jews, rape and bestiality – watch latest astonishing outburst

World heavyweight boxing champ Tyson Fury has unleashed a foul-mouthed religious rant on video.

As he prepares for his rematch with ex-champ Wladimir Klitschko , Fury has reignited the row over some of his beliefs.

Last year he caused anger with his outspoken opinions on homosexuality, abortion and paedophilia.

And in an interview recently posted on YouTube, Fury shows no sign of having mellowed.

In the expletive-littered broadcast he takes aim at paedophiles, bisexuals, sex swap ops, and what he believes is a lack of morals in society.

He said: “It’s like you’re a freak of nature if you’re normal, you’re the odd one out nobody else.

“What’s normal? I’ll just get myself changed into a woman that’s normal isn’t it today call myself Tysina or something like that, put a wig on…”

“I don’t think it’s normal I think they’re freaks of nature.”

He also appears to be critical of Jews, saying: “Everyone just do what you can, listen to the government follow everybody like sheep, be brainwashed by all the Zionist, Jewish people who own all the banks, all the papers all the TV stations. Be brainwashed by them all.”

And he continues: “I think it’ll be perfectly normal in the next ten years to have sexual relationships with your animals at home you know your pets your cats and dogs and all that so that will be legal.

“You are already allowed to marry your animals and stuff.

“It is going to happen though, isn’t it? Whatever you can think of that’s bad, will be made legal, because that’s what the devil wants.”

Posted in Boxing | Comments Off on Chaim Amalek: How shall we destroy this man?