August 28, 2016 Disinformation About 2008 Georgia-Russia War Luke Ford No sacred cows.

Disinformation About 2008 Georgia-Russia War

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes: Would the New York Times blithely report “preventing Arab nationalism is a centerpiece of the foreign policy of Israel, which invaded Egypt and Syria in October 1973 largely to forestall that possibility”? Or would the editors reject that as technically accurate but tendentious description intended to mislead from the question of which side first rolled into the Sinai and the Golan Heights on Yom Kippur?

The border between South Ossetia and Georgia had had international observers stationed on to report if somebody crossed the the border in force and ruined the erratic peace that had more or less prevailed for 17 years. Late on August 7, 2008, the international observers reported that the Georgia Army was sending tanks across their line.

In general, the 2008 war of Georgia invading South Ossetia followed by Russia invading Georgia was a lot like the Yom Kippur War of 1973 of Egypt invading the Sinai followed by Israel invading Egypt, except that:

– South Ossetia had been de facto separated from Georgia for almost 3 times as long as the Sinai had been separated from Egyptian control following Israel’s invasion and military conquest of the Sinai in 1967.

– South Ossetia had never been under the control of independent Georgia (unless perhaps around 1920), with South Ossetia asserting its independence from Georgia at the same time as Georgia asserted its independence from the Soviet Union, while Egypt had non-controversially ruled Sinai for many years before 1967.

– South Ossetia’s independence appears to have been supported by the indigenous South Ossetians, while the small number of indigenous inhabitants of Israel-occupied Sinai definitely didn’t prefer Israeli rule.

– Georgia had been actively backed by a superpower — the US had invited Georgia to join NATO in the spring of 2008 (much to the dismay other NATO members) and Georgia’s invasion of South Ossetia on August 7, 2008 was a follow-on to the Georgia’s war games with 1,000 visiting American troops from July 15-30, 2008. In contrast, Egypt had kicked its Russian advisers out in 1972.

Also, in 1973 the Israeli military was dug in on the east bank of the Suez Canal in the Sinai, so that the Egyptians’ initial battle of simply getting their army over the Canal and into the edge of the Sinai was quite heroic, as was Ariel Sharon’s improvised counter-invasion across the Canal into Egypt proper.

In contrast, the Russians had little in the way of military forces in South Ossetia, but the inept Georgians failed to secure their priority of shutting off the tunnel from Russia. The confused Russian response was blundering as well but at least they got through the tunnel into South Ossetia.

Egypt didn’t invade Israel proper in October 1973, it invaded the Sinai Peninsula. Similarly, Syria invaded the Golan Heights. In response, Israel not only drove the Egyptians once again out of Sinai and the Syrians out of the Golan Heights, but invaded and occupied sizable chunks of both Egypt and Syria that it hadn’t already occupied (eventually giving them up after much shuttle diplomacy).

But you would recognize how tendentious it would be for someone to report in an aside:

“preventing Arab nationalism was a centerpiece of the career of Ariel Sharon, who invaded Egypt on October 18, 1973 largely to forestall that possibility.”

You would be pointing out that twelve days before Sharon crossed the Suez Canal on 10/18/73, the Egyptians had crossed the Canal on 10/6/73.

“there was never any danger of Georgia actually invading Russia.”

Despite Israeli panic, there was never any danger that the Egyptian Army would somehow fight its way across all the rugged land that had taken Moses 40 years to cross and invade Israel proper. (In fact, the Egyptian war plan was to simply to cross the Suez Canal and win one battle over Israel.)

In 1973, the US not only massively airlifted weapons to Israel, but escalated the nuclear war alert status to scare the Russians into staying out.

* Steve, you are just plain wrong on the Egyptian Plan for the Yom Kippur War, moreover how desperate it was for Israel, and how close the Egyptians came to wiping out Israel short of a last-ditch Samson in the Temple nuclear response.

In short, though Arafat had no plans destroying Israel (he didn’t think it possible), his generals gambled that it was indeed possible. And they came very close — the Israelis were totally caught by surprise, and took heavy casualties. The Egyptians came close to breakthrough in the Sinai, the major reason they stalled was simply outrunning supplies particularly gas. The Egyptian Army did not have enough fuel trucks to move fast enough while the Israeli Air Force was focused on the Syrians.

Indeed the battle plan was conceptually brilliant — divide the Israelis who had superior air forces and land forces, so that they could not concentrate fire upon one adversary in turn. The mistake Sadat’s generals made was not understanding that the low training and logistical resources could not maintain the tempo needed for success. Thus the Egyptian tank forces were literally out of gas and their troops gassed from continual fighting just when Israel recovered to focus most of their force upon them.

That was nothing like the Russia-Georgia War. Which had a tiny nation up against a very, very large one with nuclear weapons. Instead of a huge nation with no nukes up against a tiny one with nukes. There was not much danger of Russia simply nuking Georgia in desperation; while there *WAS* danger of Israel feeling existentially threatened in nuking both Syria and Egypt.

* Anyone notice how the NYT; DC Post and other official MSM organs display a much stronger anti-Russian slant in their foreign policy coverage than they ever did collectively during Stalin’s regime; the Cold War; Gorbechev’s era; etc. How is it that such diverse Soviets as Stalin and Gorby are much more revered among the official left even today than Putin? I don’t entirely understand it. I mean, until Putin arrived on the scene and particularly over the last ten yrs or so, from about the 1930′s all the way to Yeltsin’s regime (ca.2000?) the USSR/early Russian Federation was pretty much treated quite favorably in the MSM especially when compared to the likes of Reagan and other perceived US “warhawks”. How is Putin any more a monster (either in kind or degree) than Stalin and the others that followed him, even including up to Yeltsin? Theories may abound but not sure there’s a satisfactory explanation as of yet.

But with Putin, the MSM have finally found a Russian leader that they clearly despise. Unfortunately the exact reasons remain unclear.

* Putin’s outlook appears to be post-Soviet in that he seems to stress more of a nationalist, somewhat open to official displays of traditional religion, and not pro-LGBTWWT, etc. but even those things don’t fully get to the heart of the matter. Perhaps the liberal-progressives along with their neoconservative allies turned on Putin in particular and Russia in general because of the formers throwing out of globalist oligarchs who helped to weaken Russia economically in the years post-USSR. In other words, had the Russian Federation from the onset had a strong willed leader with a nationalist outlook who closed its borders to global oligarchs, perhaps Russia wouldn’t have been in the economic doldrums it found itself in during the late ’90′s. I mean, is Borris Yeltsin really recalled today with much fondness in Russia for being a great leader? Seriously? Yeltsin was very much appreciated and respected by the Western globalist elites, much the same way as was Gorbechev, but how do the ordinary Russian masses view Yeltsin today?

Also, does anyone know how Gorbechev is viewed today right now in Russia? Not among the Western global elites, but among the Russians themselves? How is he recalled in Russia?

Posted in America, Israel, Russia | Comments Off

Will too many Israeli children lead to demographic disaster?

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

Isn’t it the quality of the children that matters? If they are high IQ (over 115), then they will be a blessing to the nation. If they have IQs under 100, they will be a curse to the Jewish state.

Jerusalem Post:

Tal claims people are deterred from addressing demography by “the very virulence of attacks against anyone who challenges such a central principle in the country’s code of ethics.”
Those who critique Beduin birthrates, he says, are said to have racist motives, and those who say Jews should have fewer children are accused of being “anti-Zionist.”
He asserts that the sense of “social justice” among “privileged, liberal intellectuals” makes them fear criticizing haredim and Beduin who have large families.

Steve Sailer notes: “So while the quality of argument in Israel isn’t necessarily all that high on average, look at the quantity. When it comes to arguments about the future, quantity has a quality all its own.”

COMMENTS:

* The geography of Israel is a lot like the geography of Southern California: Tel Aviv is Santa Monica, the San Gabriel Valley is the West Bank, Lake Arrowhead / Big Bear Lake are the Golan Heights, the Dead Sea is the Salton Sea etc.

* If Israel ever ‘normalized’ relations with the rest of the world – something which will never happen, as the only other ethnicity as stubborn, self-centered and ruthless as Israelis are Arabs, then Israel’s ‘demographic problem’ would be eminently solvable.

As a hi-tech modern state relying on sheer brain-power to make its living in the world, Israel is uniquely placed to find a lucrative niche in today’s ‘globalized’ world – and thus the problem of accommodating a high population density in a rather hot, dry, barren, inhospitable etc land could be handled with solutions such as desalinazation, air conditioning etc, and the marked shift of a once agricultural nation into the ream of a high income high productivity urbanised nation. Think of Israel as a greater LA – before third world immigration destroyed it.

* “Some of the world’s leading Jewish environmentalists feel that the normal rules of demographic restraint should be suspended in the case of the Jewish people.”

That statement sure has a familiar ring to it.

* One thing I’m not sure I’ve ever seen discussed in the media is to what degree is Israel’s ongoing real estate cost crisis caused by “overpopulation”? The conventional wisdom is that it’s due to poor planning, bureaucracy and regulation, fiscal policy, etc, but what if the “poor planning” is because the folks doing the planning 20 years ago learned how to do it from European countries with lower birthrates?

* While Israel is horrendously overcrowded, when you hear Israeli’s complain about it, their problem is not population density or whatever, it’s that the “wrong kind of Jewish people” are taking over.

The “wrong kind of Jewish people”, are Haredim and Hardelim (literally translates to “mustard”). Whenever you hear Israeli’s mention “settlers”, that is code for Hardelim.

Haredim/Hardelim simply cannot coexist with secular/”traditional” Israelis (there is no such thing as secular Mizrahi Jews, so they call themselves traditional). Sadly, secular and traditional birthrates are indeed above replacement but they are on the decline and rapidly outpaced by Haredi/Hardeli births. In fact, 40% of Jewish children born in Israel are born to Haredi/Hardeli families, and the percentage rises about 1 point every year.

In the 90s, there were problems with Haredim taking over neighborhoods but now the Haredim are taking over entire cities. Beit Shemesh was once a center of Israeli decadence but is now under Haredi rule and the secular/traditional are being ethnically cleansed from it. The secular have already given up fighting for Jerusalem and Tel Aviv is also starting to feel the squeeze.

This article mentions emigration, but who is emigrating? I’ll tell you who isn’t: Haredim, Hardelim and Israeli Arabs. They never leave the country as they actually have some real roots in the place. Emigration, or “Yerida” as it is called in Israel, is a totally secular/traditional phenomena, and a growing one at that.

This is not a new issue in Israel. Israelis have been talking about this for 2 decades but after they failed to draft the Haredim into their army 2014 it sunk in for them that they are doomed and now they are in sheer panic. Their days are numbered and they know it so they lash out the only way they know how: by writing stupid articles.

So for all the people here who don’t like Jews, I got some bad news for you: you are about to get A LOT more of them. How does another 5 million sound?

* Israel is 34th in terms of population density, Belgium is about the same and The Netherlands is higher(30).

* A side effect of Israel’s intra-Jewish demographic changes is that the number of people who’d consider solving the Palestinian problem by kicking them out of Israel is growing steadily.

Just give it a little time.

* First, the secular Jewish birthrate in Israel is not declining, it is rising. It is still below the Haredi birthrate, of course.

Second, the Hardal (not “Hardeli” – that isn’t a thing) sector, which are groups of Haredi Jews who have become more Zionist, are not a large part of Israeli society, and they are also pretty much admired by seculars and traditionals because they have decided to pull their part in the military and economy.

Thirdly, the population of so-called ‘settlers’ is dominated by neither of those groups, but rather the National Religious who are entirely different.

Fourthly, religious people – Haredi, Hardal, or otherwise – are absolutely not taking over Tel Aviv. Their presence in the area is restricted to one suburb, Bnei Brak, which also has a huge industrial park.

Fifthly, neither seculars, nor traditionals, nor anyone else, outside of a few far-Left writers for Haaretz, have given up on Israel. Studies have shown that Israeli Jews are the most optimistic people in the Western world. The future will be different than the secular, socialist, past, no doubt, but there are reasons to think that Israeli Jews will make it work. People have been predicting the demographic doom of Israel since before 1948 and they’ve been wrong every time. There are indeed getting to me too many Haredi, but they are one shave and outfit change away from being standard Jews, i.e. people with a 115 average IQ ready for the 21st century workforce.

* “Some of the world’s leading Jewish environmentalists feel that the normal rules of demographic restraint should be suspended in the case of the Jewish people,” Tal writes, “at the very least until pre-World War II numbers are restored.”

I wonder what the response would be if a journalist in the US were to write:
Whites used to be ~25% of the world’s population around a century ago, but now are only ~10%, due to factors such as scapegoating for all the ills of the world, selfless donations to support a burgeoning population in Africa, encouragement by the elites to overwork themselves and pay for illegals and other minorities to have children like a Pez dispenser, etc. So obviously, the rules of normal demographic restraint should be suspended for Europeans and their diaspora, at least until their percentage of the world population returns to the historical 25% level we observed in the past.

* The statistics cited by the Israeli about drastic declines in fertility in Arab countries are mostly fraudulent. There is no evidence of such a decline in the Gulf states, Egypt, Iraq, Yemen or Syria. Meanwhile, the Israeli birth rate has been essentially constant since the early 90s. But wherever they are and whatever they do, even if they recreate the heartwarming density of the ghetto in their own communities, Jews will always be vastly outnumbered by gentiles, so perhaps they should not thirst quite so much for attention, validation and reformation of their neighbours. Less tikkuning the olam please, Jews.

* Seems like Israel needs more Lebensraum. With all the Syrians clearing out, maybe the new Syrian government will return some of Israel’s “rightful property.”

* The Japanese don’t seem to think they need millions of Taharrush gang rapists to save them from demographic decline.

* One odd yet largely unremarked upon aspect of the demographics of Israel is that there’s no large Jewish city in the scenic inland north – the Galilee. The largest Jewish town there is Nahariya, with a population of 50,000 or so. Compare that with the equally remote desert south, which has the city of Be’er Sheva with over 200,000 people. The founders of Israel had a romantic attachment to the idea of settling the desert.

* Most US aid to Israel comes in the form of weaponry, which keeps your military industrial complex humming right along.

Many Israelis (like me and Libertarian-ish former Likudnik Moshe Feiglin) would like you to keep your aid, thank you very much, as it creates an undesirable quid pro quo codependency.

* Yes, Mizrahi average lower, but the Haredi in Israel are probably ~2/3 Ashkenazi if not more. It is also interesting to note that in Israel and France Mizrahi are currently holding their own as far as representation in the high IQ professions, so perhaps IQ testing done a generation ago missed something. Another data point: Thus far there have been only three science Nobel Laureates born in Arab countries (population ~200 million) and two have been Mizrahi Jews (population ~1 million).

* But first of all, the definition of a Hardal Jew (not Hardelin as the previous commenter coined – that isn’t a word) is someone who is Haredi in appearance but also very Zionist, has served in the military, and is more likely to participate in the economy. So to the extent that Hardal numbers are growing, that represents a good demographic trend for Israel militarily. (Whether it is good culturally is another matter of course)

As for the Haredi, one possible outcome, which is already happening to some degree, is that constant Arab attacks on Haredi will push them toward more participatory Zionism and military service. Already a disproportionate number of victims of Arab stabbings and beatings are Haredi, for several reasons including that they are concentrated in working class Jerusalem neighborhoods in proximity to Arab ones, that they are easily identifiable as Jews (and stereotypical ones at that), and that they don’t fight back well because they have no military training.

* Israel is a special case because it is the only high GDP nation in its corner of the world, and furthermore the only high GDP nation which is only nine miles wide and surrounded by hostile people and countries committed to its liquidation.

* I’ll tell you how this ends. Israeli Jews will just take over more Arab land, the same way the Zionist did: by buying it, settling it and conquer what is in between.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off

WP: What’s the alt-right? A primer

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

David Weigel writes for the Washington Post:

‘The Camp of the Saints’
A 1973 French novel by Jean Raspail, published as “Le Camp des Saints,” which envisions an immigrant invasion of France, and which many on the alt-right view as prophetic. In a 2005 essay for the American Conservative, after riots in France, commentator (and future Michelle Bachmann collaborator) Jim Pinkerton cited Raspail’s novel at length to ask why Europe had not realized it was committing “national suicide.”

As Raspail describes the scene aboard the immigrant convoy, “Everywhere, rivers of sperm. Streaming over bodies, oozing between breasts, and buttocks, and thighs, and lips, and fingers … a welter of dung and debauch.”
But France is persuaded that these people are a “million Christs,” whose arrival will “signal the dawn of a just, new day.” In other words, Raspail writes, what the French are lacking is a proper sense of national-racial consciousness, “the knowledge that one’s own is best, the triumphant joy at feeling oneself to be part of humanity’s finest.” Instead, he concludes, after having been beaten down by decades of multicultural propaganda, “the white race” has become “nothing more than a million sheep.”

Raspail’s vision has been cited frequently at Breitbart News, especially when a major Western leader criticizes anti-immigrant sentiment. “Now, as in the novel, prominent political officials are urging on ever larger waves,” wrote Breitbart’s Julia Hahn in 2015. “Secular and religious leaders hold hands to pressure blue collar citizens to drop their resistance; media elites and celebrities zealously cheer the opportunity that the migrants provide to atone for the alleged sins of the West — for the chance to rebalance the wealth and power of the world by allowing poor migrants from failed states to rush in to claim its treasures.”

‘Cuckservative’
A portmanteau, from “cuckold” and “conservative,” used to troll people who call themselves conservative but support immigration reform and multiculturalism. The implication: A white American who allows mass immigration into his country is no different than a man allowing other men to sleep with his wife.

‘It’s the Current Year!’
A logical fallacy, popularized on 4chan and Reddit, in which an idea can be dismissed because “it’s 2016” (i.e., the world and history have moved on, and there is nothing left to discuss). It’s frequently identified with HBO’s John Oliver, whose commentaries (circulated widely on progressive news sites) often label ideas as ridiculous because, well, it’s 2016.

Jared Taylor
The founder of American Renaissance, a magazine, then conference, then website about white identity. Ever game to talk to media — though critical of the term “alt-right” — he’s used the publication and conference to encourage white nationalists to expand on their ideas.

Pepe the Frog
A cartoon that originated on MySpace but was adopted by Trump supporters and alt-right trolls, as reporter Olivia Nuzzi explained at length this year.

Peter Brimelow
The founder of VDare, a clearinghouse of news and opinion about immigration, which he founded after his immigration book “Alien Nation” became a taboo bestseller.

‘The Political Cesspool’
A white nationalist podcast and radio show that began in 2004 and grew its following during Barack Obama’s presidency, and became notorious after Donald Trump Jr. appeared to promote his father’s presidential campaign.

Richard Spencer
The president of the Virginia-based National Policy Institute and founder of the defunct website Alternative Right, which was “dedicated to heretical perspectives on society and culture — popular, high, and otherwise — particularly those informed by radical, traditionalist, and nationalist outlooks.” One of the most media-savvy thinkers in the movement, Spencer was an early supporter of what Trump’s campaign represented; before that, he helped find and promote young alt-right thinkers. In addition to shaping what “alt-right” meant, Spencer coined the term “identitarian” to distinguish white people who wanted to defend their culture but rejected the label of “racism.”

Sam Francis
An influential conservative thinker cast out of the movement’s mainstream — and fired from his Washington Times column — for speaking at the 1994 American Renaissance conference. Subsequently, he became a sort of martyr for nationalist writers and thinkers. Throughout his career, he argued that cultural liberalism was not as popular or inevitable as its promoters claimed.

“Whites need to form their racial consciousness in conformity not only with what we now know about the scientific reality of race but also with the moral and political traditions of Western Man-White Man,” Francis wrote in 2005. “The purpose of white racial consciousness and identity is not simply to serve as a balance against the aggression and domination of other races but also to preserve, protect, and help revitalize the legacy of the civilization that our own ancestors created and handed down to us, for its own sake, because it is ours, and because, by the standard of the values and ideals we as a race and a civilization have articulated, it is better.”

Walt Bismarck
A musician and video editor who grew a following (under the sobriquet “Uncuck the Right”) with pop song parodies rewritten around alt-right themes. “The alt-right does not comprise obese low church Protestant Baby Boomers with 103 IQs,” he explained to Fusion in 2015. “We’re a bunch of eccentric hipsters and neckbeards who understand how the Left works, and how to create legitimately subversive and effective propaganda.”

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off

The alt-right’s take on Clinton’s speech: Botched, but legitimizing

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

David Weigel writes: Hillary Clinton’s highly touted address on the “alternative right” sparked debates in every corner of American politics. For some commentators on the left, such as the historian Rick Perlstein, Clinton’s decision to cleave “mainstream” conservatism from the alts was an unforced blunder.

“Republican congressional candidates have to be tied to a Trumpism that is understood as the apotheosis of the recent history of the Republican Party,” Perlstein wrote. “Because if they are not, it would be oh so easy for the survivors to say, on November 9: It ain’t me, babe. I’m a Ryan conservative, not a Trumpite. We Ryanites are normal, respectable folk. After all, even Hillary Clinton says so.”

For the alt-right and its allies — a group that temporarily included Republicans who accused Clinton of a strange diversion — the speech helped elevate a fringe. Jared Taylor, the editor of American Renaissance, told The Washington Post before the speech that his colleagues were taking bets on whether they’d be name-checked. After the speech, he was simply bemused…

“What Clinton single-handedly did is give the movement the greatest publicity and legitimacy it’s had in years,” wrote VDare’s James Kirkpatrick. “She also specifically designated George W. Bush and John McCain as the kind of good loser conservatives she wants Republicans to act like. In other words, she praised them for being the collaborators they are.”

Richard Spencer, president of the National Policy Institute, had the same take.

“The Alt Right as a moniker of resistance is here to stay,” Spencer said. “Hillary just ensured that; there will be more and more people, with various perspectives, adopting it. At this point in history, the ‘Alt’ is just as important as the ‘Right.’ Hillary aligned herself with George W. Bush and John McCain. The Alt Right is the real opposition. We’ve made it, I never thought this would happen so quickly.”

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off

Top 10 signs your kid is #AltRight

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

LINK: 4. They refer to you as a “cuck” when you put on FOX News.

5. They refuse to do their chores because it is the current year.

6. They’ve carved ancient Nordic symbols into their wrists that “normiefags like you wouldn’t understand.”

7. You find a “Make America Great Again” hat which is hidden inside their sock drawer.

8. They refer to their curfew as “the downfall of Western civilization.”

9. When you ask them which Disney or Pixar character they want to show up to their birthday party, they scream at you and say: “I only want Pepe!”

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off

New Test Detects Race and Gender With a Single Hair

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

News: Look out criminals. The crime-busting tools of science fiction are becoming a reality. A new forensic test can detect the ethnicity and gender of someone using nothing but a single hair, and in less than two minutes no less, according to a new study.
The study, published in the Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, details how a new tool designed by scientists has shown a 100 percent success rate in identifying gender and ethnicity using a strand of hair.
This test reportedly trumps DNA testing currently used by law enforcement – which traditionally relies on blood to determine factors like gender and ethnicity. According to a Queen’s University press release, the new test and tool also works in a fraction of the time of standard blood testing, getting highly accurate results in about 85 seconds.
According to the study, the test takes an unusual approach to DNA testing, in which a single hair is ground up and then burnt. The foul smelling vapor consequently produced is then analyzed to produce a DNA analysis that reportedly has had a 100 percent success rate.

Posted in Race | Comments Off

Girl, 16, took own life after fearing she’d be called a racist after picture of her with darkened skin was shared online

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

Daily Mail: A teenage girl took her own life after fearing she would be called racist after a photo of her with darkened skin and a headscarf was shared online.
Phoebe Connop, 16, from Halesowen in the West Midlands, had edited the photo after getting into an online relationship with an Asian male.
The talented gymnast sent the picture to friends on a private Instagram chat, explaining that the only way she would win the approval of her boyfriend’s parents would be if she looked like the girl in the photo.

Posted in Race | Comments Off

Cathy Young: The Unbearable Dumbness of Being Alt-Right

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

Cathy Young writes:

An even more salient point, however, is that Western culture is essentially a mongrel culture. To sing plaudits to Western culture while singing the virtues of unmolested ethnic homogeneity is a bit like holding a charity dinner for the promotion of vegetarianism at the Ruth Chris Steakhouse. In a macro sense, Western culture as we know it is the product of the cross-breeding of Christianity, a religion imported from a certain Middle Eastern nation — or, as the alt-right would put it, (((Christianity))) — with Graeco-Roman civilization. By the way, Christianity explicitly proclaims the triumph of universalism over ethnic tribalism, or does Vox’s copy of the Bible somehow miss Galatians 3:28? (That would be the “neither Jew nor Greek” part.)

COMMENTS:

* (((Cathy))) just can’t keep herself from spewing out hatred of for white people. So she openly attacks those white people that might be leary of the AltRight by calling their glorious culture that invented the automobile, the airplane and put a man on the moon as mongrel, thus calling them mongrels.

It’s a form of persuasion Cathy thinks she can get away with because she believes white people to be so thoroughly demoralized at this point from decades of a never ending stream of white guilt. She believes the stockholm Syndrome is so deep and so intact that when an Ashkenazi jew who is herself at minimum 50% European genetics tells a European they’re a mongrel there should be nothing but obedient acceptance.

She then goes onto tell you that the US was always some sort of multicultural nation despite the founders telling you the exact opposite. Or plays a game of sophistry by arguing that a nation that was only 90% white isn’t in any way different than a nation that will be less than 50% white. Brazil and South Africa however beg to differ.
Finally the jew whose holiest of books mocks the Virgin Mary and says Jesus is boiling in hot excrement and commands that the New Testament be destroyed, delivers her hardest and most stinging scourge by audaciously lecturing Christians on Christianity.

So there you have it white people. Any effort to maintain your heritage, culture and even genetics will be embraced. Accept it or be called a Nazi and a white supremacist. Never remember or consider that it was your white ancestors who in strong cohesive community that absolutely centered around being white bulit this nation for you. Never ever make the realization that at some point even if you do accept it you will be called a Nazi and a white supremacist until your erasure is complete. Look forward with optimism at the future you’ll leave your children while Israel works toward becoming a 100% pure ethnostate.

* Vox Day (VD) has made a good attempt at defining the alt-Right but the thought process has a way to go. He would really benefit by reading Alain de Benoist and understanding the French way of distinguishing between universalism and particularism. Christianity is a universalist religion and so some of those modes of thinking remain in VD’s thoughts. For example the implied universalism of Western Civilization (WC). A particularist would have said WC is the most superior organizational principle for white people, but not necessarily for others.

The alt-Right is basically a form of White Zionism where particularist ethnocentric interests mean appeals to universals are limited. But VD’s problem is he is hanging on to universalist Christianity while de Benoist leans more towards particularist paganism. The Jews managed to resolve their similar internal contradiction by having one God who has universalized Jewish particularism by naming them the Chosen People, which is obviously just a call for Jewish Supremacy. Whites must do the same if they want to hang on to Christianity by developing a White-as-the-Chosen-People narrative. Jews will obviously not be happy about getting competition for the Chosen People catagory!

VD, like myself, is both American and European. But in Europe justifying their alt-Right (Identitaires) is very easy — white people are the indigenous people of Europe and should control their land. This makes European Identitaires the allies of the ANC, Sitting Bull, the Tibetan Resistance, and all national liberation movements. But this attitude throws under the bus alt-Right people in America, Israel (which is basically the first alt-Right state), Australia, and especially South Africa. But the American alt-Right is not indigenous to the US and so must appeal to the right of conquest. Muslims currently conquering Europe by means of the cradle and the refugee raft are in a sense allies of the American alt-Right, since if Europeans are as stupid as the Native Americans were 400 years ago then white Europeans deserve to lose their nations to the Muslim hordes.

As for the mongrel culture comment, this does not bother me at all since it is obviously true especially if we consider white people as separate races. But just for laughs, can you cite a culture that is NOT mongrel?

* Just one question: Why does Cathy Young oppose a secure existence for white people and a future for white children? Would appreciate a reply. Thanks.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off

Chat Logs Expose Crash Override Network as Online Bullies

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

From Heat Street: Harassment is rife on social media. Users are allegedly targeted for no reason other than their gender or the color of their skin and the only response by these platforms is to ban users who violate their code of conduct. More often than not, users simply engage in online arguments with each other based on their political views.

In the months after the GamerGate movement arose, Zoe Quinn founded Crash Override Network, or CON. Her alleged infidelity was the catalyst for the now infamous hashtag. The organization was set up to fight online abuse—purporting to deal with the harassment of women and minorities in the game industry on social media. In case you’re wondering, the name was inspired by the cult ‘90s movie Hackers.

In response to criticism of its platform, Twitter established a “Trust and Safety Council” to make the platform a less hostile place for users. The council is supposed to prevent abuse, harassment, and bullying. Among the select organizations to become a part of the council, Feminist Frequency was listed as an inaugural member. It’s no secret that Feminist Frequency now sponsors Crash Override Network.

If you ask any of CON’s members (assuming they choose to speak), they’ll tell you they joined the group to fight what they saw as the abuse of vulnerable individuals on social media. This is only partially factual. In truth, CON started as a Skype chat and morphed into a Slack channel where members gossiped about people they disliked on Twitter and targeted supporters of the Gamergate movement. I would know, because I was one of them.

Chat logs originating from a Skype group chat prior to the creation of the secure channel were recently leaked by YouTube personality BroTeamPill in a livestream and reveal much of what actually went on behind the scenes. I’m inclined to write about what transpired if only to set the record straight and give context to CON as an organization.

Among the topics itemized under “online abuse” on the official Crash Override Network site, doxing—or the circulation of private information—is listed. Yet the leaked chat logs clearly show members expressing their disapproval of how Randi Harper, who was also a member of CON, was doxing people on Facebook. A week later, members of the organization cheered her on and discussed plans for how to destroy their targets’ careers. A few moments later, two members talked about filing police reports on an individual accused of doxing a member of the group.

To save face and to protect the integrity of the flock, Harper informed the group that another member intended to publicly denounce her “so we don’t all get painted with the same doxxer brush.” It should be noted that Harper, the creator of the “GGAutoblocker,” maintains a personal Twitter blocklist for supposed harassers —many of whom are simply on the list for simply disagreeing with her. The blocklist is endorsed and used by thousands of users—including celebrities and journalists—who are mislead into thinking that it helps them avoid abuse. Harper has been criticized by self-described “social justice warriors” for including many transgender persons on the list.

Katherine Cross, the secretary of Feminist Frequency and columnist at games industry website Gamasutra, praised Harper’s actions.

“I really don’t have much sympathy for GG here. The Facebook rooms were public. Although I might’ve opposed this still if I didn’t know Randi’s deeper motives here– sometimes the only way to confront the storm is to redirect it,” she wrote.

Beyond doxing and expecting the mob to publicly shame outed individuals, the group went a step further and discussed contacting employers to get people fired. This included silencing a member of the armed forces and Purple Heart recipient for his views supporting Gamergate by contacting his superior officer. The group also targeted Google employee Justine Tunney, who was both a vocal supporter of Occupy Wall Street and GamerGate. There was no shortage of threats to sue anyone who supported GamerGate into financial oblivion.

The group as a whole often served as a hammer wielded by its participants and engaged in petty disputes with individuals on social media. It made a concerted effort to attack and defame game developer Brad Wardell because of a personal beef Zoe Quinn had with him. There was much discussion surrounding prominent consumer advocate and YouTube personality John “TotalBiscuit” Bain, with unkind remarks about his health and chemotherapy treatment. Both individuals had expressed support for GamerGate.

Other YouTubers like the popular atheist commentators Sargon of Akkad and Thunderf00t and media critic MundaneMatt, also were subjects of discussion because of CON member Rob Marmolejo’s personal beef with them. Marmolejo was recently exposed as a sex pest after it was revealed that the organization may have enabled his sexual harassment of women online. According to public statements by Israel Galvez, another CON member, over 20 women have come forward with allegations about Marmolejo.

The group believed that it carried more clout than other Twitter users because of its “SJW powers,” and members requested that Randi Harper escalate reports they’d made about GamerGate supporters to hasten suspensions. It went well beyond simply getting people banned from Twitter—the group made an active effort to hurt their opponents’ wallets, and they usually did so by going after their Patreon accounts. Individuals like 8chan site owner Fredrick Brennan and lawyer/blogger Mike Cernovich were on the receiving end of their actions. Additionally, members of CON conspired to sabotage the charity stream of feminist charity The Fine Young Capitalists, which needed funds to develop an independent video game. The Toronto-based organization had past history with Zoe Quinn. For its part, TFYC has since released their first game, Afterlife Empire, on Steam in 2015.

Intent on painting GamerGate as a “hate movement,” members of CON looked for every opportunity to pin the blame on GamerGate for anything that might make its supporters look bad. The group discussed highlighting transphobes within GamerGate to blame them for the suicides of transgender women. Despite a lack of evidence that the suicides had anything to do with GamerGate, CON members rationalized that trolls who participated in “Operation Trans Genocide” from 4chan’s /pol/ board were undoubtedly affiliated to the movement. A CON member wrote a Tumblr post on the matter, blaming GamerGate for everything awful under the sun, and countless tweets made during that time attempted to tie both subjects together.

Posted in America | Comments Off

‘Racists Anonymous Is a Thing, Holds 12-Step Meetings at North Carolina Church’

Posted on August 28, 2016 by Luke Ford

If hatred of other races is interfering with you leading a happy life, then I suspect such a 12-step group as this could help.

Complex.com: Is racism an addiction and a disease? Is the first step to recovering from racism admitting you have a racism problem?

A white church leader in North Carolina has partnered with a local woman to approach the problem that way, hosting weekly Racists Anonymous meetings modeled after 12-step programs that help people deal with alcohol, drugs, overeating and sex addiction. The group’s creation, in part at least, seems to have been spurred by recent police shootings.

Rev. Nathan King of Trinity United Church of Christ in Concord, N.C. tells WCNC-TV that the group began after, “It seemed like every week we were coming into worship and we were doing another prayer because someone had been killed in the street. … It’s to deal with the racism within ourselves and to eliminate the racism within ourselves.”

Posted in Addiction | Comments Off