The Creeping Takeover Of Israel

A common critique of Jews is that they believe in homogeneity and nationalism for themselves (traditional Jews oppose inter-marriage and the massive immigration of non-Jews to Israel, etc) but multi-racialism and multi-culturalism and open borders for everyone else, including the United States.

So today while I was thinking about that critique, I got an email from Young Israel of Century City. The headline was, “The Creeping Takeover Of Israel.”

The body of the email said:

Please join us…to hear from our long time friend Ari Briggs, International Director of Regavim and learn about his important work in Israel.

THE NEGEV WAR 2013

Ever so quietly, without the roar of battle and clamor of war, the Jewish People are being robbed of the Land of Israel.

On this battlefield cement mixers have replaced tanks, plows replace cannons and innocent-looking civilians replace uniformed soldiers.

Only the goal remains the same – Disinheriting the Jews of their land – acre by acre, with guile, with violence, with huge sums of money provided by organizations from overseas and by anti-Zionist organizations in Israel.

This is happening in the very heart of Israel and in the heart of the consensus areas, in the Galilee, in the Negev, in Jerusalem and in the coastal plain.

Time is slipping away and with it the land reserves that belong to us and future generations.

Ari works for Regavim, http://www.regavim.org.il/en/ an organization whose raison d’etre is to ensure responsible, legal & accountable use of Israel’s national lands and the return of the rule of law to all areas and aspects of the land and its preservation.

Attached is an article Ari recently wrote for the Jerusalem Post about the Begin Plan to resettle the Beduin in the Negev.

Ari Briggs wrote in The Jerusalem Report May 4, 2013:

Last Thursday TV personality Avri Gilad went on a trip to the northern Negev with Regavim – an independent, professional research institute and policy planning think tank involved in protecting Israel’s national lands. So disturbed was he by what he saw on that trip that upon his return he immediately penned the following post on Facebook: “I came back from a tour of the Negev conducted by Regavim. I’m appalled by what I’ve seen. There’s no more Negev.

The Beduin have taken it over completely by force….

By shameless criminal activity, with insolence met only by fear and submission, the Beduin have taken over the entire Negev.”

He noted that though he had visited Beersheva and Arad, he had never entered Beduin towns like Laqia, Hura or the others he saw on this trip. Gilad also wrote that the government of Israel has virtually agreed to give Beduin clans in the Negev over 60 percent of the state land they have illegally settled on. On top of this, former MK Benny Begin sweetened the deal recently, offering them more land and additional monetary compensation. Avri Gilad, in his post, called on the government “to stop the Begin plan immediately,” and said, “We have to re-conquer the Negev.”

He concluded by saying “we must have one law for everyone – both for a Jew who encloses his balcony [without authorization] and for a Beduin who uses a fence he stole from Omer to enclose five dunams [0.5 hectares] of land as his.”

Gilad’s post went viral, and when interviewed later on Army Radio, he stated over 450,000 people had seen it.

However, it didn’t take long for the many defenders of the Beduin’s supposed right to take whatever land they want to jump into action. These foreign-funded, radical left-wing NGOs have done a great job training the various Beduin tribes to always refuse the Israeli government’s every offer of compromise and hold out for 100 percent of their claims.

They came out swinging with an opinion piece published in a daily newspaper calling Avri Gilad a racist.

Ari Briggs wrote Sept. 9, 2012 in The Jerusalem Report:

When Israel realized that it could no longer ignore the massive spread of illegal Beduin settlement in the Negev, it developed generous programs to regularize the situation. In 2007, it established the Goldberg Commission, headed by retired Supreme Court Justice Eliezer Goldberg. Following the publication of its recommendations, the chairman of the Policy Planning Division of the Prime Minister’s Office, Ehud Prawer, was appointed to lead a committee to convert those recommendations into a viable government program. In 2011 the committee’s report was published, and approved by the government.

The Prawer plan calls for a massive initial investment of NIS 1.2 billion and the legalizing of many of the illegal Beduin settlements established in the Negev. For those 20,000-30,000 Beduin whose settlements cannot be legalized, it offers generous gifts of land of up to five dunams per family, thus rewarding the Beduin’s illegal behavior with private land in the land registry.

Ari Briggs wrote Dec. 9, 2013 in The Jerusalem Report:

As long as there is no determined law enforcement and a small number of Beduin can take what they want, no plan will work.

Recently a “day of rage” in Israel was initiated to protest the Begin Plan, the government’s proposal to accommodate Beduin settlement in the Negev.

To understand why the position of the government and the position of some Beduin seem so irreconcilable, all we have to do is stand in the shoes of these Beduin.

To do that effectively, some background information is needed: There are approximately 220,000 Beduin in the Negev, making up 2.8 percent of Israel’s citizens. About 140,000 of the Beduin live in the seven towns and cities that were expanded and funded by massive government grants in the 1970s and 1980s including Rahat, Laqia, Segev Shalom, Arara, Kissufim and others. Although only 7,600 Beduin are registered as living in the newly-approved 11 Abu Basma towns, which include towns like Al Sayyid and Bir Hadaj, our research indicates that approximately 40,000 Beduin live there.

This leaves approximately 40,000 Beduin living in illegal villages, hamlets and outposts, on state-owned land. These Beduin (20% of the Beduin population) occupy approximately 600,000 dunams (150,000 acres) in an area between Beersheva, Arad and Dimona in the Northern Negev.

For the sake of comparison: There are 205,000 residents in the city of Beersheva living on only 34,600 dunams (8,650 acres) of land. Instead of taking these law-breakers to court and then enforcing the resulting court orders to remove them from these illegally occupied locations, the government has proposed the Begin Plan to finally arrange Beduin settlement in the Negev specifically geared to finding a more than equitable solution for these 40,000 people.

I am sure many Americans feel the same revulsion towards the massive immigration to the United States by illegal aliens from primarily Mexico over the past 50 years.

In this video published in 2013, an Englishman asks Jared Taylor: “You mentioned dual standards… You have a situation where America like our country [Britain] is dominated by a particular ethnic group… You say the Jews have their homeland and they have announced it is a homeland for Jews. Yet the same people in America through their various organizations like AIPAC and all the rest of it have announced that they want America to ease its immigration controls and to proclaim an amnesty for illegal immigrants. That’s millions and millions of people. In our country, the Board of Deputies of British Jews in the early 1950s promulgated the first draft of what was to become the notorious Race Relations Act in the Group Libel bill, and this is now part of our law, part of the Public Order act, whereby if you criticize particular ethnic groups, particularly the Jews themselves, you face on conviction for a first offense, going to prison for six months. These people are an ethnic group, they play the ethnic minority card, and their behavior in Palestine and Israel and their behavior outside Palestine, in Britain and America, is racism for us, but multi-racialism for you. Now it wouldn’t matter if an ethnic group in America like the Eskimos or the Red Indians or the Navajo or even the Mexicans had that sort of hypocritical view because they haven’t got the clout, the power, the money power and the media power and therefore the political power of Jewry, but they have got that power and therefore what they do and what they think and how they’re brainwashing our people is very important. I don’t think you can get to grips of how our people are stampeding to the cliff like lemmings, you can’t get to the nub of this matter until you address Jewish duplicity on the question of race.”

Jared Taylor: “There is no question that the aggregate impact of Jews has been overwhelmingly unfavorable on all of the questions that I touched on. There’s no question that Jews have been extremely vocal about promoting diversity in the United States while maintaining homogeneity in Israel. As far as American Renaissance, we have been focused exclusively on race. One can’t afford to be a crank on more than one subject at a time. There are a plenty of places where one can learn about the Jewish question.

“At the same time, there are a number of Jews who are entirely on our side on these questions. American Renaissance conferences have always had a number of Jews. One of our speakers said, you can’t realistically expect Jews who are concerned about preserving Western civilization in America to make common cause with people who want to kill them.”

“My position has been one of setting aside this question and starting with an easier question — our displacement by other people. At the same time, I am not convinced that saying that this is a problem inflicted upon us by Jews changes any of our arguments.”

Posted in Immigration, Israel, Jews | Comments Off on The Creeping Takeover Of Israel

David Duke’s Infamous ‘Jewish Enemy’ Incident at American Renaissance 2006

Here is some background. American Renaissance is a group as devoted to white interests as the NAACP is to black interests and the ADL is to Jewish interests.

The ADL just gave George W. Bush an award for fighting anti-semitism. I doubt that Bush’s efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq were in America’s interests or in Israel’s interests but they were enthusiastically supported at the time by most of the leading Jewish pundits (who make up half of America’s important pundits) such as Charles Krauthammer, Jonah Goldberg, Fred Kagan, Robert Kagan, John Podhoretz, William Kristol, David Brooks, Thomas Friedman, Peter Beinart, and Jeffrey Goldberg. None of these guys have paid any price for being so terribly wrong.

David Duke later wrote:

On the last day of the conference, the wonderful French writer/philosopher Guillaume Faye spoke about the “Threat to the West.” In an excellent presentation he focused on the internal and external threat of fundamentalist Islam to Europe. It is my belief that we must stop the non-European immigration into our homelands, but I also firmly believe that supporting the Jewish extremist, Neocon ”Clash of Civilizations” external war is disastrous. The Iraq War and adventurism elsewhere are taking our focus from the real threats here at home. And the so-called war on terrorism has spawned the means they use to suppress our freedoms here at home. As all of you have heard me say repeatedly: “It is not the Iraqi borders that we should be concerned with, but the Mexican-American border.”

It is also my belief that the immigration problem itself and perhaps even more importantly, the destruction of European American consciousness and traditions, the advance of egalitarianism, feminism and multiculturalism, globalism — all have been driven by Jewish extremists in their relentless quest for supremacy. It was not the Arabs who opened our immigration floodgates, who took over our anthropological sciences, who led the multicultural and diversity march, who weakened us with Marxism, Freudianism, Feminism, pornography, abortion and acceptance of non-reproductive sexual deviance and every sort of debilitating cultural, physical and spiritual nihilism. Even more important, it has not been the Arabs who have seized the control points of mass media as well as the sources of political finance and influence that have led to the ethnic cleansing of our people across the European World. Although we must oppose massive immigration with all our ability, it is not Arabs or Muslims who have led the attack on our people. In fact, they weren’t even the ones who changed our immigration laws.

Jonathan Tilove wrote for the Jewish weekly, The Forward:

For the small, hardy band of right-wing Jews who attended this past weekend’s American Renaissance Conference, the biennial gathering of white nationalists ended on a sour note.
The events Saturday, February 25, passed without major incident. But then, late Sunday morning, none other than former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke approached the microphone on the floor during the question-and-answer session for French writer Guillaume Faye. After congratulating Faye for stirring remarks that “touched my genes,” Duke asked if there weren’t an even more insidious threat to the West than Islam.
“There is a power in the world that dominates our media, influences our government and that has led to the internal destruction of our will and our spirit,” Duke said.
“Tell us, tell us,” came a call from the back of the room.
“I’m not going to say it,” Duke said to rising laughter.
But Michael Hart, a squat, balding Jewish astrophysicist from Maryland, was not amused. He rose from his seat, strode toward Duke (who loomed over him like an Aryan giant), spit out a curse — “You f…ing Nazi, you’ve disgraced this meeting” — and exited.
As it happens, only a few minutes earlier Hart, a mainstay of American Renaissance conferences, had been trying to reassure Herschel Elias, a first-time attendee from suburban Philadelphia, that he should not let his observation that the meeting was “infiltrated by Nazis and Holocaust deniers” ruin his impression of American Renaissance.
“The speakers aren’t Nazis,” Hart assured him. “Jared isn’t a Nazi.”
Jared is Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance magazine. He founded the publication 1990, and since 1994 he had sponsored the biennial conference that bears its name. A former liberal, Taylor is glib, gracious and genial, capable of putting his white nationalism in the most benign and commonsense terms.

Michael Berman wrote for the American Renaissance magazine in 2003:

If the definition of a liberal is someone who has never been mugged, then to know my history is to understand my political journey.

I was a red-diaper baby. That is, my father was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party USA. Years later, he came partly to his senses, but remained a liberal on all issues, including race. Predictably, my parents encouraged their children to go forth and enjoy the multi-racial joys of New York City. I even marched with Martin Luther King when he made his famous speech, but his dream became our nightmare. Multi-racialism resulted in a private, and on some level deserved, holocaust for my family and me.

I am the eldest of five. One of my sisters, who was 13 at the time, was raped when she attended a party on our block. One of the blacks repeatedly asked her to go upstairs to see his apartment. After several rejections, he accused my sister of racism. As a well-indoctrinated, guilt-ridden liberal, she had no choice but to go with him. Out of fear and shame, my sister did not share her story with us until she landed in a mental ward a couple of years later.

Another sister was raped by a black open-enrollment “student” at City College in a locker room after she attended a co-ed swim class. The prosecuting attorney told my sister it was an open-and-shut case because she did everything she was supposed to do: She reported the event immediately, gave a detailed description of the accused (including a bizarrely shaped goatee), and then went directly to the hospital. However, after all the evidence was given, when the jury was polled, the whites voted to convict, but the tribe hung together and hung the jury.

Ironically, before her trial even began, another black tried to rape her in the elevator of her own building. He entered the elevator after her, and sent it down to the basement. There he cut her neck and was about to have his way with her, when someone luckily brought the elevator back up.

The following term, when my sister attended her first political science class, she found that the black who had raped her after the swim class was to be her classmate. She marched off to the administration office in a fury, where she loudly threatened to sue the school for its lack of security. They settled then and there by agreeing to pay for her to complete her education in Israel.

My mother’s wrist was broken when an African American relieved her of her pocketbook. I, myself, had a gun at my head twice on the streets of New York when blacks mugged me.

During the period of my family’s holocaust in the late ’60s and early ’70s, I was starting my career as a teacher at George W. Wingate High School in Brooklyn. It had recently opened as the city’s first deliberately-integrated high school. At first, it offered a good education, but I was struck by the differences in the abilities, work ethic, and behavior of the races. I also noticed that the students segregated themselves in the cafeteria.

Integration can be defined as the period from when the first black moves in until the last white moves out. As the school began to tip in the expected direction, there was racial violence and several race riots. This festering condition culminated in the infamous Day of Knives. On the last day of the school year, as the students were going home, many blacks menaced their white classmates with knives, and warned them not to come back. The whites got the message and stayed away.

I served as dean of boys during the last of my eight years at that school. We averaged five arrests a day out of a student body of about 3,000. One of my duties was to convince fearful parents of victims to press charges. Every day a paddy wagon came from the local precinct to process the day’s catch. Sometimes we ran out of handcuffs.

There were junkies nodding out in the cafeteria, and the aroma of pot was everywhere. It seemed as if more students roamed the halls than attended class. Every six weeks or so, a teacher could be expected to be sent to the hospital. I remember one young handicapped woman who walked with a cane. Someone pushed her down the stairs, and she did not come back until the following year. After only a few days someone pushed her down the stairs again. She never came back.

I also recall the day a substitute cop was assigned to my office. At first, he put his feet up on the desk and expressed pleasure with such an easy assignment. By the end of the day he was complaining he was working harder than a desk sergeant.

One Senior Day started with water pistol battles, graduated to entire waste baskets full of water, and then fire extinguishers. The school had to be evacuated because the water was ankle deep. In one five month period, five of our students had either committed murder or had been murdered. One teacher who was assigned to the school left for lunch on his first day and never came back.

By the 1980s I had developed an interest in the race question. My family and former friends would call it an obsession. They typically dealt with The Problem by running away from it. To me, how liberal a person is on the topic is usually a function of his geographic distance from it.

I have always been interested in statistics, and my first exposure to racial stats came when I was watching a television program about the Bernie Goetz case. [Mr. Goetz was a white New Yorker who shot several young blacks who were trying to mug him.] I was stunned when the announcer said blacks were ten times more likely to commit a violent crime than whites—stunned not by the number, but to learn that this information was available and being discussed. I sent for the transcript, and found myself compiling a collection of articles on crime. My next great discovery was Charles Murray’s Losing Ground. In 1992, I learned about Jared Taylor’s Paved With Good Intentions from the Bob Grant radio program. The rest, as they say, is history.

It has not been easy for me as a New York Jew, embracing the views that I do. I am regarded as a pariah when I express myself. Mostly by choice, I am estranged from my family. My comrades are my gentile wife and retired former colleagues who have shared my professional experiences and who have drawn similar conclusions from their observations.

Posted in Blacks, Islam, Jews | Comments Off on David Duke’s Infamous ‘Jewish Enemy’ Incident at American Renaissance 2006

How Long Till Jewish Community Watch Returns?

JewishCommunityWatch.org (JCW) combated child abuse (primarily within Chabad). It was founded and largely operated by Meyer Seewald, a victim of child abuse and an ex-Orthodox Jew who has little formal education, no college, and no professional training. What he does have is street smarts, courage, intuition, and passion for a project sorely needed.

JCW is controversial within Orthodox Judaism for many of the same reasons that The Awareness Center under Vicki Polin was attacked (it shut down circa 2006). Both operations were fundamentally lay-led with some rabbis signing on later and taking great heat for it.

Potential supporters didn’t want to be on the hook for everything Meyer Seewald and Vicki Polin chose to do and they didn’t trust that Meyer and Vicki were controllable.

Among Chabad Jews I know, JCW has been a major topic of conversation for over a year.

There’s no precedent in Orthodox Judaism for what The Awareness Center and JCW have done. Orthodox rabbis in particular are scared to support something that is run by secular Jews who by definition don’t obey Jewish law. Before they can sign on to something like JCW, they need assurance that everything will be done according to Jewish law. From the perspective of JCW’s biggest supporters, these rabbis are cowards.

JCW director Meyer Seewald wrote on Facebook February 6, 2014:

It is with deep regret and sadness that I write this letter. After more than two and a half years, we at Jewish Community Watch are forced to close our doors. It gives us great pride to know of what we have accomplished throughout our existence: raising awareness for child sexual abuse within the Jewish community, funding therapy for survivors of abuse, bringing to justice those who have destroyed the lives of our children, and countless other fulfillments.

Since Jewish Community Watch was established, thousands have contacted us seeking support. To this day, emails continue to pour in requesting assistance with matters of child sexual abuse. We have done our best to help anyone who has needed assistance and we believe that our efforts will not be forgotten.

Disappointingly, the time has come where we are no longer able to rely solely on the words of support we have so frequently received. Very few individuals have transformed those words into action and donated time and funds to help keep our operation going. The few that have served as the life support system for Jewish Community Watch.

Many mistakenly assume that there are minimal costs to running this organization – needless to say, that cannot be farther from the truth. The expenses of running Jewish Community Watch go way beyond the cost of maintaining the website. As the organization has grown and more and more professionals have been recruited to work with us, the costs of operating have increased substantially. A number of selfless individuals have forgone the safety and comfort of steady-paying jobs to commit their time nay, their lives, to JCW on behalf of the Jewish community as a whole; sadly, we have been unable to compensate them for all they have done.

Aside from the website hosting fees, there were also office expenses, phone bills, security, maintenance costs, and more, at times reaching thousands of dollars. Additionally, funding for therapy for numerous survivors of abuse who were unable to afford their medical bills and other programs that brought aid and comfort to survivors left us with overwhelming bills that we can no longer fund.

After countless fundraising efforts with minimal or no results, it is clear that moving forward will only sink us deeper into an already enormous debt. It is true that the cost of keeping the JCW website on the internet is only a few dollars; however, as long as it is up, we will continue to receive requests for assistance that we would be unable to fulfill.

Today, there is still nothing set up in our community to help victims of the devastating and heinous crime of child sexual abuse. Those who raped, molested, sodomized our precious boys and girls are still walking around the streets with their heads held high. Hundreds of ongoing investigations will now be terminated and any of the perpetrators’ names have not been revealed to the public will continue to go about their business exuding an air of arrogance and confidence while the victims live in the shadow of their memories of pain and defilement.

We dread the results that the closing of JCW will have on our children: young men who are suspected of or who have actually molested children will once again be free to work as counselors in our overnight camps; men in our community who have molested but were holding themselves in check will once again feel safe to groom and violate our children; would-be molesters will not feel the need to seek professional help because the fear of being exposed on the Wall of Shame will no longer be present. But the community has made their decision by their lack of financial support and we can only abide by it.

We leave now the opportunity in the hands of those who have condemned us. We leave this responsibility to the leaders of our communities who have stood for decades in silence. Perhaps, finally, those who have never seen our cause or have never stood for the countless innocent victims of sexual abuse will awaken to the epidemic that has plagued our community for ages.

Sincerely and regretfully,
Meyer Seewald,
Director of Jewish Community Watch

Here are my reactions to this announcement.

* It seems like a re-run of The Awareness Center. There’s a high burnout rate in this type of crusade. Everybody seems to want to stop child abuse but organizations that name predators get attacked and eventually they tire and shut down.

* It seems like JCW was biting off more than it can chew. It doesn’t take much money to operate a website. Funding therapy for child abuse victims, however, does cost a lot of money. Funding for a professional staff costs a lot of money. Funding Meyer so that he can avoid a regular job and make this his living costs a lot of money. JCW had such a big mission it became overwhelming. With a slimmed down purpose and operated on a voluntary basis, something like JCW could go forward without needing any money. You don’t need an office and special equipment.

* JCW had a confrontational our-way-or-the-highway approach that scared off many potential supporters. JCW didn’t compromise and bargain as much as it pursued its mission with great focus. Many Orthodox Jews who nominally support it weren’t willing to sign checks for a group that doesn’t yet have non-profit status and no Chabad rabbis on board.

Posted in Abuse, Awareness Center, Chabad, JCW | Comments Off on How Long Till Jewish Community Watch Returns?

Why Is The NAACP Defending A Convicted Woman Beater?

VDARE answers: “The NAACP is defending Henriques because he’s black and they’re black. This is far from being the most despicable thing the NAACP has done on these lines. In their death penalty activism, they spend a lot of time defending people who are guilty of the most terrible murders—simply because they’re black.”

Posted in Abuse, Blacks | Comments Off on Why Is The NAACP Defending A Convicted Woman Beater?

I Wish Victoria Nuland Lived Within The Torah Corral

I sometimes think the world would be a better place if Jews stepped away from running the world and studied Torah instead.

God chose the Jews to be the MasterRace of mankind. However, He soon realized that this had cruel consequences for the less intelligent goyim of creation, so to protect them from the depredations of the Jews while still providing free will to one and all, he gave the Jews the Torah (both written and oral) by which they might be fenced in. Rest assured that those Jews who today live on the Torah Corral (like myself and Chaim Amalek) are no threat to the gentle gentiles of the world. It is the secular liberal Jew, with his notions of Marxism, tolerance of the sodomite and the transgendered, creator both of socialism and feminism, who is the mortal enemy of the gentile world. I say this in the hope that when you goyim awake from your deep moral stupor (an increasingly unlikely event) and begin dealing with the Jew problem in your midst, you will leave me alone. I hope this clears everything up.

Steve Sailer writes: “What’s going on in Ukraine, where the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland was embarrassed by the Russkies releasing a presumably tapped phone call of her attempting to stage-manage Ukrainian affairs (e.g., heavyweight champ Vitali Klitschko should be kept out of any coalition government) and expressing short-temperedness with her putative E.U. allies?”

Why are Americans trying to stage manage Ukraine? Why did so many Jews try to install democracy in Iraq? That does Jews and Americans no good and the world no good. Sometimes we’re just too smart for our damn good and we’d be better off minding our own business and studying our tradition.

Sailer writes: “Considering their catastrophic track record on Iraq and their continued ascent in the stratosphere of power players, is there anything the Kagan-Nulands could screw up that would hurt their careers?”

Looking back from 2014, the careers of the pundits who were wrong about invading Iraq (Charles Krauthammer, Jonah Goldberg, Rich Lowry, Fred Kagan, Robert Kagan, Victor Davis Hanson, John Podhoretz, William Kristol, David Brooks, Thomas Friedman, Peter Beinart, Jeffrey Goldberg, and Fareed Zakaria) have prospered while those who were right (William S. Lind, Robert Scheer, Jonathan Schell, and Scott Ritter) have had few rewards.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on I Wish Victoria Nuland Lived Within The Torah Corral

The Missing Sheitel

* At a kosher resort in Mexico a couple of weeks ago, a woman fell into the ocean and lost her $3,000 sheitel (wig). So she offered up a $500 reward for finding it and all the Mexicans hopped to it but never found it. They had no idea the Jewish women were wearing wigs.

* During the first few days of law school, this gorgeous woman was constantly answering the professor’s questions and seeking out his approval. Then she was told, “You know that essays in law school are graded anonymously? You don’t put your name on them, just a fake social security number.” Once she found this out, she stopped participating in class and soon dropped out. She’d made it through undergraduate work on charm and good looks, but she couldn’t cut it in law school.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on The Missing Sheitel

Rethinking The White Australia Policy

From Wikipedia:

Andrew William Fraser (aka Drew Fraser) (born 1944) is a Canadian-born academic and was latterly an Associate Professor in the Department of Public Law at Macquarie University in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.[1] Fraser holds a BA (Hons) and an LLB from Queen’s University, an LLM from Harvard University, and an MA from the University of North Carolina. His most recent book is The WASP Question (2011).

In July 2005, [Drew] Fraser received national attention in Australia with a letter to his local newspaper, signed with his academic title, in which he claimed that importing Sudanese refugees threatened to turn Australia into “a colony of the Third World” and “Experience everywhere in the world shows us that an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and other social problems”.[2][3][4]
Macquarie University responded that it distanced itself from Professor Fraser’s remarks, but backed the right of academics to say what they wish in a responsible way. The acting Vice-Chancellor, Professor John Loxton, stated there was no place for racism at the university, but it “recognises and protects academic freedom as essential to the conduct of teaching, research and scholarship”.
Fraser was accused of being affiliated with White Supremacist groups, including the Patriotic Youth League (PYL), by the anti-racist group FightDemBack. Although both he and the PYL initially denied any connection, Fraser admitted he had attended PYL meetings and signed up to the PYL website after video footage of a PYL member describing him as an official legal adviser surfaced.[5]
Following an outcry from Sydney’s Sudanese community, Macquarie University Vice-Chancellor Dianne Yerbury on July 29, 2005 decided to suspend Fraser from teaching any further at the campus on the grounds that the race debate was “threatening to spill over into the classroom” and was “affecting the university’s ability to operate effectively.” [6] Macquarie University offered to pay out the final year of his contract but Fraser declined, describing the offer as a “dishonorable discharge”.[7]
On this incident, Fraser wrote:
“Truth is no longer a defence when it comes to charges of academic deviance. Instead of an invitation to debate the issues, the Vice-Chancellor’s office sought to get me off campus as soon as possible by offering to buy out my contract. The head of Human Resources made it clear to me that my public comments were damaging their efforts to market Macquarie University to foreign students.

“When I refused the offer on the grounds that it amounted to a dishonourable discharge, VC Di Yerbury, ordered that I be suspended from teaching. This was justified on the specious grounds that the safety of students supposedly had been threatened by, among others, my supporters! For what must be the first time in academic history, alleged threats by outsiders to disrupt classes were met, not by tightening security to deal with the disrupters, but by getting rid of the disruptee.”[8]
In August 2005, more than 300 Macquarie University staff and students attended a forum on racism and free speech, at which Fraser (as well as Sudanese community and University members) was allowed to put his views from the floor.[9]
Fraser’s suspension ended in mid-2006, when an early-retirement package took effect.
In September 2005, Fraser wrote an article advocating a return of the White Australia Policy, entitled “Rethinking the White Australia Policy”. The article was set to be published in the law journal of Deakin University, but the University directed the journal not to publish it.[10] “Rethinking the White Australia Policy” has since been published and circulated across the internet.[11]
In the controversial article, Fraser wrote:
“Given the relentless and revolutionary assault on their historic national identity, white Australians now face a life-or-death struggle to preserve their homeland. Whether effective resistance to their displacement and dispossession can be mounted is another question. Unlike other racial, ethnic or religious groups well-equipped to practice the politics of identity, white Australians lack a strong, cohesive sense of ethnic solidarity. As a consequence, ordinary Australians favouring a moratorium on non-white immigration cannot count on effective leadership or support from their co-ethnics among political, intellectual and corporate elites. On the contrary, our still predominantly Anglo-Australian rulers are indifferent; some profit from, and others actually take pride in their active collaboration with the Third World colonization of Australia. None of the major parties, indeed, not one member of the Commonwealth Parliament, offers citizens the option of voting to defend and nurture Australia’s Anglo-European identity. The problem, in short, is clear: The Australian nation is bereft of a responsible ruling class.”[12]
In December 2005, Fraser further criticised multiracialism in Australia by writing an article regarding the 2005 Cronulla riots, entitled “Diversity vs. Freedom: Australians Fight On The Beaches.”[13] As with the full version of “Rethinking the White Australia Policy”, the article was only published on the internet, namely on the U.S.-based webzine VDARE.
A complaint from the Sydney Sudanese community about the original newspaper letter was upheld on 31 March 2006 by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, on whose direction Fraser reluctantly apologised for his remarks.[14][15]
Andrew Fraser addressed the American Renaissance Conference in February 2006, alongside speakers such as Nick Griffin of the British National Party and Professor J. Philippe Rushton. This was followed up later in the year with appearances at the Inverell political forum in March and at the Sydney Forum in August alongside speakers who included Jim Saleam of the Australia First Party.

Drew Fraser has several articles on VDARE.com including this one on the White Australia policy in force until 1974.
I emailed Drew Fraser: “I am curious about the aftermath of your remarks. How have people treated you? Has your life been ruined or enhanced by this controversy?”

He responds:

G’day Luke,
In the immediate aftermath of my published remarks on African immigration, I was suspended from teaching by the Vice-Chancellor of Macquarie University. But this was part of a long pattern of conflict between myself and the university administration. For decades, I had been regarded as a burr under the university’s saddle by “progressive” elements in the faculty as well as the administration.

That conflict became worse over time as the university and the law school became ever-more feminized. The law school ladies did not like and would not tolerate argument and debate over the central elements of the progressive ideological consensus. In 1999, the femocracy moved to expel me and several other men (including several Marxists) from the law school. In a form of academic apartheid, we were sent into exile in the Arts faculty in a purpose-built Department of Public Law.

While I enjoyed the relative autonomy of that arrangement, I did resent the stigma attached to our department.

As a consequence, when my comments resulted in suspension, I was more than ready to bail out and retire.

There was nothing the university could do to deprive me of my pension so my life since leaving law teaching has been relatively pleasant. Freed from teaching duties, I found the time to write The WASP Question and give talks to various groups around Australia.

The take-away message here is the absolute importance of financial independence to anyone contemplating a public break with the politically-correct orthodoxies of our time.

Regards,
Drew Fraser

Posted in Australia, Race | Comments Off on Rethinking The White Australia Policy

How To Use Facebook

Under most posts I read on Facebook.com is a button allowing you to share the post on your own wall. Many times when I do that, I then get a request from the original poster to delete the post or photo I shared. And I always respond, “Learn to use your Facebook settings so your posts and photos are not shareable.” But so far nobody has figured out how to do that, so I went and investigated that matter with my 118 IQ. Many people find it easier to ask others to clean up after them than to clean their own path through life.

Every time you make a post on Facebook, at the bottom of the post is a setting that allows you to determine who can see it. Set it to “Friends except acquaintances” if you don’t want anyone sharing your post or photo. Leave that as your default if you need that privacy.

PS. Here’s my Facebook movie (highlights of my six years on FB).

* Luke smiles as he turns away briefly from FB.
Friend: “What are you smiling about?”
Luke, who always love to hide behind his religion and wave it like a bloody flag: “I went to a Torah lecture last night and the rabbi was teaching Rebbe Nachmann and he urged us to smile all we can and to be happy and to rejoice in everything good in ourselves and others.”
Friend: “Whatever.”

* When I lapse on to a certain topic (I was explaining why an 8 yo black boy watching porn on an XBox ended up raping his sister but won’t be tried for a crime because he allegedly didn’t know what he was doing), I’m told: “It’s like Paul McCartney talking about harmony. It’s like Mario Andretti talking about race cars. It’s like Mohammed Ali talking about boxing gloves. It’s like Picasso talking about oil paints.”

Posted in Facebook | Comments Off on How To Use Facebook

Who? Whom?

Who will win? Whom do we take from?

That was Lenin’s philosophy. Says Wikipedia: “Who, whom? is a Bolshevist principle or slogan which was formulated by Lenin in the Russian language as кто кого (kto kogo). In Lenin’s view, this was the fundamental question of politics — who will dominate whom; who will kill and who will die? In this view, all compromises and promises between enemies are just expedients — tactical manoeuvres in the struggle for mastery.”

I can’t think of two more important words for understanding the world today than “Who? Whom?”

For instance, though Barack Obama is half white and half black, he identifies as black. That is his group that he looks out for. So he develops programs such as Obamacare that massively distribute from the rich and the middle class (overwhelmingly white) to the underclass (disproportionately black).

Ideology and religion motivate much of the world today, but probably not as much as evolution (the desire to propagate your genes over everyone else’s). Who is our group? Whom do we take from?

Steve Sailer wrote: “In reality, the end of ideology was not the “end of history,” as Francis Fukuyama famously claimed. Instead, after two centuries of occasionally battling over what is the ideal form of government, the human race has reverted to its traditional pastime of brawling over who gets to run the government. In understanding affairs of state in the non-Western world today, neither Mein Kampf nor Das Kapital nor the Gettysburg Address is as insightful a guide as The Godfather.”

I just rewatched The Godfather I and II. These movies are a great guide to post-WASP America. The Italians in these movies embody the tribal mind set. Who will conquer? Don’t trust a stranger. Country means nothing, blood means everything. You can only trust family.

The Anglo-Saxon perspective is different. Australian professor Drew Fraser wrote:

Kevin McDonald explains Western “cultural” traits as an evolutionary adaptation to the rigors of life in cold, ecologically adverse climates. Natural selection worked there to favour the reproductive success of those individuals capable of sustaining “non-kinship based forms of reciprocity.” [30]

Over time, individualistic social structures encouraged the emergence in England of the common law of property and contract and, later still, the emergence of impersonal corporate forms of business enterprise, all requiring cooperation between strangers. The distinctive culture that emerged from the interaction between the genotype of the English people and their environment can be understood as what Richard Dawkins calls an extended phenotype.

The one group in America that doesn’t think about its group interests is WASPs. I can’t see them winning out against tribes such as Jews, Chinese, Japanese, Latinos, blacks, Armenians, etc who are fervently devoted to their own interests. “But is it good for the Jews?” is a common statement in Jewish life. As one who grew up a WASP in Australia and America, I never heard the sentiment, “But is it good for WASPs?”

Jews are concerned about inter-marriage, blacks (particularly women) and Asians (particularly men) are somewhat concerned, but WASPs have almost no concern about inter-marriage and almost no concern about their group interests. WASPs are cool with talking to strangers. That’s become an American characteristic. It’s not so common with the tribal view of life.

A simple way of understanding race is that it is an extended family, partly in-bred. Because of in-breeding, there are common characteristics. There’s a certain look to many Australians and the English, to many Orientals and blacks, to many Mexican Indians and Mexicans of European descent.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on Who? Whom?

White On Black Crime

From NYTimes.com: “This video tells the story of a black teenager in Florida who was killed by a white man after an argument over loud music. The slain youth’s father shares his loss.”

Patrick Buchanan writes: After researching the FBI numbers for “Suicide of a Superpower,” this writer concluded: “An analysis of ‘single offender victimization figures’ from the FBI for 2007 finds blacks committed 433,934 crimes against whites, eight times the 55,685 whites committed against blacks. Interracial rape is almost exclusively black on white — with 14,000 assaults on white women by African Americans in 2007. Not one case of a white sexual assault on a black female was found in the FBI study.”

Though blacks are outnumbered 5-to-1 in the population by whites, they commit eight times as many crimes against whites as the reverse. By those 2007 numbers, a black male was 40 times as likely to assault a white person as the reverse.

Posted in Blacks, Race | Comments Off on White On Black Crime