Rebbe: The Life and Teachings of Menachem M. Schneerson, the Most Influential Rabbi in Modern History

I am sure this new Joseph Telushkin book is a fun read but I don’t trust its scholarship.

“One of the greatest religious biographies ever written. Generations from now, Rebbe will be read by people of every faith.” (Dennis Prager, national talk show host and New York Times bestselling author of Still the Best Hope)

Dennis Prager was given the opportunity to have a private audience with the Rebbe in the 1970s but he skipped it. Dennis was a hyper-rationalist at the time and was not particularly interested in meeting a holy man.

Why has Chabad blossomed since the Rebbe’s death?

The Rebbe called America a “nation of kindness.”

On his radio show June 10, 2014, Dennis Prager said: “If you want to be inspired, there’s an inspiring biography of a rabbi just published. It is number one among Christian leadership books on Amazon. Who today doesn’t read about books about people of different faith?”

Well, followers of the Rebbe and Orthodox Jews in general rarely read biographies of people of different faiths. I doubt the Rebbe read biographies of people of different faiths.

Do you prefer the truth or do you prefer to feel good? In almost all circumstances that I can think of, I prefer to know the truth.

I notice the book has glowing reviews from “Ronn Torossian is CEO of 5WPR, a top 25 US PR Firm, Author of best-selling book “For Immediate Release” – and a proud Jewish admirer of Chabad and the Rebbe.”

The New York Times reported in 2008:

Last month, a New York public relations firm representing Agriprocessors, 5W Public Relations, posted fake blog comments under Rabbi Allen’s name on FailedMessiah.com, a Web site that is fiercely critical of the Rubashkins, and on the Web site of JTA, the Jewish news agency. Shmarya Rosenberg, who runs FailedMessiah.com, traced the fraudulent comments on his site to a 5W address. JTA reported that one false posting in Rabbi Allen’s name came from an address belonging to a 5W executive, Juda Engelmayer.

The postings seemed intended to discredit Rabbi Allen by making him appear to use crude, arrogant language. In a statement, 5W confirmed that the postings came from its offices but said that they had been made by an intern without approval.

The Jewish Week says:

To his credit, Rabbi Telushkin does not shy away from a range of opinions voiced by the Rebbe that sound dissonant and worse to our contemporary ears. Rabbi Schneerson’s literal interpretation of the Bible led him to reject Darwin and the theory of evolution. His similarly literal reading of the Talmud also led him to maintain that the sun revolves around the earth. Further troubling, especially given Rabbi Schneerson’s own erudition and education (not to mention the large number of Chabad houses on campuses across the country), was his general opposition to his followers’ attending college or receiving university degrees. The reason: exposure to and immersion in secular life during the impressionable years of adolescence and young adulthood could lure the observant away from traditional belief and practice.

Mark Oppenheimer writes for the Forward:

Neither “Rebbe,” by best-selling “Jewish Literacy” author Joseph Telushkin, nor “My Rebbe,” by the Talmud translator Adin Steinsaltz, is a traditional, chronological biography. Both authors divide their book into thematic chapters, approaching this mountain of a man first from one face, then from another. Both authors devote a chapter or a substantial section to the Rebbe’s famous “dollars,” the face-to-face meetings where he would dispense blessings to anyone who came, along with dollar bills intended for charity. Both authors discuss the Rebbe’s theological anti-Zionism, which he married to an intense love for the people who — disagreeing with him — had settled and lived in Israel. After considering the claims of those who believed the Rebbe to be the actual Messiah, both authors dismiss the notion, and exonerate the Rebbe from encouraging such speculation.
These are hagiographies. One can finish both Telushkin’s book, which is long, anecdote-rich and written in a comfy, American idiom, and Steinsaltz’s, which is shorter and stilted, without encountering a single flaw in the Rebbe. Steinsaltz is himself a Lubavitcher, while Telushkin does not identify as one. But it doesn’t take a Hindu to revere Gandhi.
“This is an admiring biography,” Telushkin writes, “but one that I hope has been written with open eyes.” I think that Telushkin did his best, but what can one say about a subject who, after accepting the job that he would hold for the last 40 years of his life, had no personal confidants except his wife (and she none besides him, at least none that have spoken up); never traveled outside his home state; and in millions of written and spoken words rarely spoke of himself or his own feelings? Although the Rebbe made his hawkish beliefs on Israeli defense policy known, he otherwise stayed out of politics, especially in the United States. He stayed in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, met with admirers, offered them blessings and cryptic bits of advice on personal matters that they brought to him, gave out dollars, and told his emissaries to go out and spread Judaism.
If the Rebbe had any personality outside his persona, either nobody saw it, or those who saw it don’t tell. Beholding the discretion of those around the Rebbe, one can only wonder that every pope should be so lucky.
So there’s really not much to say, if the goal is to bring us closer to the Rebbe. Telushkin, who seems to have read everything by or about every member of Chabad, and who has many personal friendships to draw on as well, offers a rounded portrait of life in the shadow, or the sunlight, of the Rebbe. We meet dozens of followers and hear their stories, get a feel for the texture of their devotion, for why they loved him.
The Rebbe insisted that girls as well as boys be featured on the cover of his Chabad youth magazine. The Rebbe hatched the idea of putting Hannukah menorahs on public lands, to announce a Jewish presence alongside the Christmas tree. And then there were the miracles attributed to the Rebbe, like the couples who conceived a child after asking, in desperation, for his blessing.
The Rebbe believed that every Jew, even one who had helped Stalin to murder other Jews, could be saved. “When you go back the next time,” the Rebbe said to a Jewish dignitary who was to have an audience with Lazar Kaganovich, “you should tell him he should still do teshuvah,” referring to repentance. “[H]e still has a chance.”
That belief that all Jews contain a spark of the divine undergirded his belief in kiruv, or outreach, at a time when most Orthodox Jews believed that less observant Jews were something like possible contaminants. Today, other Orthodox groups do outreach work, and even leaders of the Reform movement point, perhaps with a gulp, to the Chabad model.
Did we need 500 pages of this? Not when 300 would have done. But even at its present length, Telushkin’s book is a winning portrait — of the lover, not the beloved. If I had written this book, I would have been more scathing about many of the Rebbe’s teachings: how he discouraged his followers from going to secular university, for example, or his ruthless realpolitik with regard to the Palestinians. But seeing Telushkin’s ardent efforts to put the Rebbe in the best possible light, even when he has to overthrow his own better judgment, paradoxically makes me even more intrigued.

Posted in Chabad, Mark Oppenheimer, R. Joseph Telushkin | Comments Off on Rebbe: The Life and Teachings of Menachem M. Schneerson, the Most Influential Rabbi in Modern History

Where’s My Work Ethic?

When I see how family, friends, and relatives have outstripped me in life, I look around and try to remember where I last put my work ethic. I think I had some in my glory days of blogging. I still stumble upon it when I find something interesting.

I don’t like regular work. I prefer an endeavor I can get passionate about. I’ve never done well at anything else. In short, I’m much more black than Mexican, let alone white or Asian or Jewish. Sigh. God made me this way.

I got fired from the first jobs I held (starting in sixth or seventh grade, working in some bloke’s garden). By high school, I managed to hang on to some positions, receiving mediocre marks.

I remember when I moved to Australia in June of 1984 to live with my brother for a year after graduating Placer High School in Auburn. I industriously went out looking for work only to find that nobody wanted to hire someone who was only going to be in the country for a year. So I stopped saying that truth and got a job as a stockhand for GJ Coles. As they began training me to become a manager, a friend of my brother’s, Michael Collins, got me the cleaning contract at the Boyne Island Shopping Center. This was beaut.

I didn’t like my Coles job because I had to work all the time under close supervision. With the cleaning contract, I didn’t have a supervisor. I had tasks and I did them. I’ve always worked best with the least supervision. Tell me what needs to be done and let me do it in my own way. The cleaning contract was great because it gave me more time to read. Instead of going out and looking for more cleaning tasks, I liked to enjoy long breaks reading the newspaper and various books.

I am only aware of one complaint made about my performance during the six months I had the contract. I wasn’t diligent one week about scrubbing the ladies toilet. Some of the shop owners would give me a hard time about spending so much time in my office reading instead of working. They also ribbed me for not spending money in their stores. I saved about $16,000 Australian that year, which translated into about $10,000US.

I got paid more for that job back in 1984 than I make today. I went home to California and earned about $4 an hour, just above the minimum wage. Over a couple of years, that rate went to $6 an hour, still less than a third of what I was making in Australia (but the purchasing power of those dollars was almost twice).

In June of 1985, I started work in landscaping. I found the first three days really hard. I hated them. Then on the fourth day, we went to the home of the late real estate developer Doug Hanzlick and he was just super! He recognized my accent as Australian. He was kind and considerate. I met his delightful daughter Becky. I had a wonderful time. And those personal interactions made me love my job for the next two years and two months.

When I started on my book project in 1995, and started blogging in 1997, there were no limits to how long I would work (aside from the rest requirements of Jewish law). When I’m interested in something, I can go all day, no problem.

I like jobs where I can do my own thing, have the least supervision, the most freedom, and plenty of opportunities to meet girls and to hang around people I like and respect. I like some novelty and challenge and I like to get plenty of attention for my efforts. Money is good too.

My family’s work ethic puts me to shame. When did I become such a bludger? Oh, about 48 years ago.

My sister has offered me a position as the mowing supervisor on her farm. People told my brother he needed quality help for his nursery. My brother pointed out that the “quality” bit disqualified me. When I see the people relations skills needed to be a nurseryman, let alone the knowledge, I sigh and realise it’s not for me. I’m not good at serving people.

I wonder if I could inherit Dr. Ford’s surgery practice?

Posted in Australia, Personal | Comments Off on Where’s My Work Ethic?

Not All Laws Are Moral

Reacting to Dinesh D’Souza pleading guilty to illegal political donations, Dennis Prager said on his radio show June 9, 2014: “The prosecution of Dinesh D’Souza is one of the most disgusting abuses of power in my lifetime. Even if he did violate the law, Americans violate the law daily. The amount of violation he engaged in was so puny it was probably less important than a speeding ticket… It was a law that shouldn’t have existed to begin with. Not all laws are moral. Breaking all laws is not immoral. Breaking some laws is immoral.”

Posted in Dennis Prager | Comments Off on Not All Laws Are Moral

How Big Of A Sin Is It For A Jewish Man To Be With A Non-Jewish Woman?

Marc B. Shapiro writes:

The censorship of this responsum can only have one purpose, namely, so that people don’t learn about how some members of R. Stern’s community (the Hungarian hasidic world) are having sexual relations with non-Jewish women.

What is the remedy for these men who are intimate with non-Jewish women? Repentance, of course. Yet there is a very strange opinion as to how to go about this repentance. R. Solomon Ephraim Luntshitz, in his Keli Yekar[4] to Numbers 19:21, says something which is so “out of the box” that I am shocked that it has not yet been censored from the Mikraot Gedolot. (Yes, I realize that it is just a matter of time.)

R. Luntshitz is discussing the statement in Yoma 86b: “How is one proved a repentant sinner? Rav Judah said: If the object which caused his original transgression comes before him on two occasions, and he keeps away from it. Rav Judah indicated: With the same woman, at the same time, in the same place.” In context, this means only what it says, but not that someone should actually put himself in this situation. Yet this is exactly the lesson R. Luntshitz derives.

He refers to Berakhot 34b, “In the place where penitents stand even the wholly righteous cannot stand.” R. Luntschitz cites an opinion that the ba’al teshuvah (penitent) of a sexual sin has to put himself in the exact same situation as he was before, that is, to be alone with the very same woman and overcome his inclination. This is not permitted to one who is “wholly righteous” since he is forbidden to put himself in this situation. But the penitent needs to do this in order for his repentance to be complete, and this explains how a wholly righteous one cannot stand where the penitent stands, since the penitent has to put himself in a situation that would be forbidden for the righteous one. R. Luntshitz explains that the very act of repentance, i.e., being alone with the woman, “makes the pure [the tzaddik] impure and the impure [the sinner] pure.”

This is a strange passage for any number of reasons, not least of which that the action of being alone with the woman is itself sinful, even if it never leads to any sexual activity. Yet R. Luntshitz tells us that in this case we have an exception, and true repentance requires intentionally putting oneself in the exact same situation one was beforehand and this time overcoming one’s inclination. Of course, there is no guarantee that the person will emerge successfully from this self-imposed test. R. Israel Isserlein reports such an occurrence, where an individual put himself in this situation in order to achieve proper repentance, but ended up sinning again![5] Sefer Hasidim earlier warned against falling into precisely this trap.[6]

R. Luntschitz’s point is also found in his Olelot Ephraim, vol. 2, no. 228, showing that he was entirely convinced of his position.

R. Luntschitz was the rabbi of Prague, yet a later incumbent of this position, R. Ezekiel Landau, strongly rejects R. Luntschitz’s point. He acknowledges that many shared R. Luntschitz’s error, which I think is interesting since I can’t imagine anyone having such an opinion today.[7] R. Landau doesn’t tell us who else advocated R. Luntschitz’s view, but R. Mordechai Harris,[8] R. Dovid Yoel Weiss,[9] R. Yaakov Levi,[10] and Nahum Rakover[11] provide sources. Among these sources are R. Joseph ben Judah Loeb Jacob, Rav Yevi (Netanya, 2012), to Psalms 36:3, who quotes the Baal Shem Tov as offering the same approach as R. Luntschitz.

Jewish men getting together with non-Jewish women is, of course, not a new thing. The Talmud, Sanhedrin 82a, already refers to this possibility with regard to Torah scholars (!), concluding: “If he is a scholar, he shall have no awakening [i.e., teaching] among the sages and none responding among the disciples.”[12] Avodah Zarah 69b-70a deals with the status of kosher wine on the table when Jewish men are sitting together with a non-Jewish prostitute. Yom Tov Assis, in his article “Sexual Behaviour in Mediaeval Hispano-Jewish Society,”[13] discusses the situation in Spain where it was not uncommon for Jews to have non-Jewish mistresses.[14] Avraham Grossman also deals with this matter and his discussion includes other parts of medieval Europe as well.[15]

In R. Judah ben Asher’s responsa (Zikhron Yehudah, no. 91), we are told about the problem of Jews having sex with their non-Jewish slave girls (and also having impregnating them). A few centuries later, R. David Ibn Zimra testifies that there were men, learned in Torah, who even thought it was permissible for them to have sex with their slaves.[16]

The fact that the prohibition on occasional sexual relations (דרך זנות) with non-Jewish women is only rabbinic[17] no doubt contributed to many not taking it very seriously.[18]

R. Moses Isserles [19] even mentions the view of the Tur that intermarriage itself (דרך אישות) is only a rabbinic prohibition.[20] The Bah explains the Tur’s view, Even ha-Ezer 16, as follows, leaving no doubt as to the matter:

אבל בשאר אומות . . . אין בהן איסור כלל מן התורה ואפילו בא עליהן דרך אישות אלא גזירה דרבנן.

This approach, incidentally, could explain how Esther married Ahasuerus, as the prohibition on intermarriage was not yet established.

Maimonides disagrees with the Tur and assumes that there is a biblical prohibition to marry any non-Jew (דרך חתנות), not simply the seven Canaanite nations. Therefore, he claims that Solomon converted all the women he married.[21] However, R. Raphael Berdugo disagrees, and states that there was no halakhic problem with Solomon marrying these women without converting them.[22] This leads him to discuss the story of Pinhas killing Zimri and the whole concept of kana’in pog’in bo. R. Berdugo explains that kana’in pog’in bo only applies when dealing with sexual relations that are public, promiscuous, and the woman is an idolator.[23]

ולא אמרו קנאין פוגעין בו אלא דרך הפקר ועובדת ע”ז ובפרהסיא.

According to R. Berdugo, following the Tur, Jews who are married to non-Jews are only violating a rabbinic prohibition. I mention this since I recently met someone who thought that in messianic days intermarried Jews will be subject to kana’in pog’in bo. I originally thought that this was a clear error. If you look at Maimonides’ formulation, Hilkhot Issurei Biah 12:4, you find that contrary to R. Berdugo he indeed includes all non-Jews, not just idolators, as subject to kana’in pog’in bo. (And see his very strong words against Jewish-Gentile sexual relations in Hilkhot Issure Biah 12:6-7.) Yet he is just as explicit that the sexual intercourse has to be public, just like with Zimri…

Returning to the matter of Jewish-Gentile sexual relations, while the Shulhan Arukh, Even ha-Ezer 16:1, following Maimonides, Hilkhot Issurei Biah 12:2, tells us that occasional sexual relations (i.e., no marital relationship) with a non-Jewish woman is only rabbinically prohibited,[31] R. Nissim of Gerona disagrees. Yet if we are indeed dealing with a Torah prohibition then what does the Talmud[32] mean when it states that the Hasmonean Beit Din decreed against sex with a non-Jewish woman? If it was already forbidden according to the Torah, there would be no need for such a decree.

R. Nissim suggests that the Hasmonean Beit Din’s decree was designed to add an additional penalty onto an already existing prohibition. It is not that occasional sex with a non-Jewish woman was banned by the Hasmonean Beit Din, but they merely added the penalty of lashes. The reason for this, R. Nissim points out, is that sometimes people are not concerned about heavenly punishments like karet, but they are concerned with an earthly punishment.[33]

Yet this is a minority view, and the standard approach is that there is no biblical prohibition on occasional private sex with a non-Jewish woman. Here is how the Encylopedia Talmudit sums up the matter[34]:

הבא על הגויה דרך זנות, איסורו מדברי סופרים, גזרה שמא יבוא להתחתן.

(In case people are wondering, I don’t think that this is the sort of information that should be spread among the masses, precisely because that some people might decide that violating a rabbinic prohibition is not such a big deal.)

I keep stressing Jewish men and non-Jewish women, since the situation of Jewish women and non-Jewish men has its own issues that should be postponed to another post. But with regard to Jewish women who are intermarried, let me note that according to R. Ovadiah Yosef, such a woman should be told to go to the mikveh. He also adds that she should not tell the mikveh lady about her situation (I assume because she might then be refused entry).[35]

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Sex | Comments Off on How Big Of A Sin Is It For A Jewish Man To Be With A Non-Jewish Woman?

The High Cost Of Modern Orthodoxy

Marc B. Shapiro writes:

Anyone who has been to Israel knows that there are non-haredi Orthodox Jews in all areas of life. You see men with kippot who are bus drivers, security guards, and doing every other job imaginable. Yet in the United States, Modern Orthodoxy has become largely an upper middle class phenomenon. The cost of a Modern Orthodox lifestyle, which includes expensive schools and camps, is simply beyond most people’s reach. I believe that this cost is a major reason why the Modern Orthodox camp has not picked up much in the way of ba’alei teshuvah.[1]

I have no doubt that many of the non-Orthodox admire the Modern Orthodox lifestyle, and would be willing to try it out, before learning the cost. Many non-Orthodox would also be happy to send their kids to Modern Orthodox schools, but they are not going to sacrifice a middle class lifestyle for this. Those who grow up Modern Orthodox and remain in the community are prepared to make the financial sacrifices (as well as limiting how many children they have). But for those who are not part of the community, the entry fee is simply too high. Needless to say, there are also those among the Modern Orthodox who drift away because of the financial cost, and this drifting often begin when the first child is enrolled in public school. As I see it, the financial burden is the great Achilles’ heel of Modern Orthodoxy, and what prevents it from any real growth. By the same token, those of us in the Modern Orthodox world must recognize that one of the great strengths of the haredi community is that there is room in it for everyone, from the wealthy real estate developer to the blue-collar worker. If, as so many predict, the future of American Orthodoxy is with the haredim, money (or lack of it) will play an important role in this story.

Posted in Modern Orthodox | Comments Off on The High Cost Of Modern Orthodoxy

Jewish Honor Killings

Marc B. Shapiro writes:

…we indeed have some examples in Jewish history of “honor killings”. For example, in 1311 a Jewish woman who married a Christian and became pregnant was killed by her brothers.[27]

In 1557 an Italian Jew killed his sister because her alleged sexual activity embarrassed the family. Elliot Horowitz, who mentions this case, adds: “Azariah Finzi, the girl’s father, saw fit to defend this action by his only son, asserting that it was ‘inappropriate for one calling himself a Jew, especially a member of one of the best families, to suffer a veil of shame upon his face, being mocked by all who see him for the blemish attached to his family’s reputation.’”[28]

In Teshuvot Hagahot Maimoniyot to Sefer Nashim, no. 25 (found in the standard printings of the Mishneh Torah), there is a responsum which describes how a woman cheated on her husband, apparently with a local non-Jew, and became pregnant. According to her father, she also killed her baby (“the mamzer”[29]) after it was born. Her father, worried that she would apostatize, asked, indeed pleaded with, the local rabbis to permit him to kill his daughter by drowning her in the river. The rabbis turned the request down.

בא אביה של שרה לפני שנים ממנו החתומים למטה ובא לימלך בנו להורות לו אם מותר להרוג בתו לטובעה בנהר ולאבדה מן העולם . . . [אמר אביה] אני מבקשכם בכל מיני תחינה שתתירו לי להורגה.

The case is actually quite sad since she was probably a teenager in over her head. The responsum describes how she would run away from home but her mother would convince her to come back. When her father rebuked her for her behavior, her reply was, “I am not the first woman who did something bad.”

R. Asher Ben Jehiel, She’elot u-Teshuvot ha-Rosh 18:13, deals with a case of a woman who was intimate with a non-Jew and became pregnant from him. R. Asher affirms the local rabbi’s decision to cut off her nose. (See also R. Matityahu Strashun, Mivhar Ketavim [Jerusalem, 1969], p. 158 n. 3.)

Also relevant is a very strange story recorded in Ta’anit 24b. It begins by telling us that R. Yose ben Abin left his teacher, R. Yose of Yokeret. His reason was, “How could the man who showed no mercy to his son and daughter show mercy to me?” Let’s leave aside the story of R. Yose of Yokeret and his son. Here is what the Talmud records about him and his daughter.

He had a beautiful daughter. One day he saw a man boring a hole in the fence so that he might catch a glimpse of her. He said to the man, “What is [the meaning of] this?” The man answered: “Master, if I am not worthy enough to marry her, may I not at least be worthy to catch a glimpse of her?” Thereupon he exclaimed: “My daughter, you are a source of trouble to mankind, return to the dust so that men may not sin because of you.”

Although he did not physically kill his daughter, he did express the wish that she die (according to some it was an actual curse), and in the opinion of many commentators this is exactly what happened (see Hagahot ha-Bah, ad loc.). What makes this text so shocking is that the daughter was entirely innocent of any improper behavior. In other words, it was her very existence as a beautiful woman that created the problem, and as such it was better that she simply exit this world before any more men were led into sinful thoughts. I see no way that this story can be brought into line with mainstream rabbinic thought, despite many attempts to do so.[30] (At a future time I can present some lessons that contemporary moralists have derived from this story, which also are quite shocking.)

Posted in Jews, Marc B. Shapiro | Comments Off on Jewish Honor Killings

Companies Like Uber Offer Less Opportunity For Graft

In my experience, taxis are hideously expensive. To take a taxi from 90035 to LAX with no traffic will cost you about $30. To take Uber will cost you about $20 and you will be more likely to get an English-speaking driver. I’ve only had good times with Uber. I just wish its app worked for my Blackberry.

Taking the Los Angeles public bus system was much better than I expected, just so long as you are not picking up people from icky parts of town.

Glenn Reynolds writes:

The regulatory knives are out for Uber and Lyft, two ride-sharing services that make life easier for consumers and provide employment opportunities in a stagnant economy. Why are regulators unhappy? Basically, because these new services offer insufficient opportunity for graft.

Services like Uber and Lyft disrupt the current regulatory environment. I have the Uber app on my phone. If I need a car in areas where Uber operates, it looks up where I am using GPS, matches me with participating drivers nearby, and in my experience gets me a Town Car in just a few minutes. It’s the comfort of a limo service, with the convenience of a taxicab. I get a better service, the driver gets a job, but now there’s competition for those entrenched companies.

In most cities, traditional taxi services are regulated by some sort of taxi commission. Similarly, limo services — the ones that provide the black Town Cars favored by big shots (and used by many Uber drivers) — are regulated by some sort of livery office. The rules strictly forbid the two sectors of the market from competing with one another. And, generally, entry is limited so that neither faces too much competition in general. In holding down competition, these regulators act on behalf of the entities they supposedly regulate for the benefit of consumers.

Posted in Economics | Comments Off on Companies Like Uber Offer Less Opportunity For Graft

California, Texas Have Similar Demographics

Allan Wall writes: VDARE.com has repeatedly pointed out that the demographics of Texas are already quite similar to those of California. But Texas is Republican because whites vote heavily for the GOP (not quite as overwhelmingly as the Deep South states, but maybe that’s coming). In contrast, California has what Texas Republican strategist Ralph Griffin called a “crazy white people problem”—and of course idiot GOP leadership obsessed with outreach to unwinnable minorities, apparently not realizing that the party does not even carry California’s white vote.

Texans are not crazy. The have voted to survive.

Posted in California, Immigration, Texas | Comments Off on California, Texas Have Similar Demographics

Why Does Israel Protect Its Borders But America Doesn’t?

John Bennett writes for American Thinker:

Many Western nations are restricting immigration because of popular anger at the unwelcome changes brought about by mass immigration.  America seems to be the rare country with the misfortune of having politicians who won’t stand up for citizens.   

How many nations around the world have to be thrown into crisis and division for us to learn that mass immigration is not always a positive?  Israel, Great Britain, France, Switzerland, Italy, and Norway are just a few of the Western nations that energetically guard their territorial integrity, and some party leaders in those countries openly explain why they do so.

Israel’s “smart fence” protects “the character of the country”  

When faced with a massive influx of African immigrants, PM Benjamin Netanyahu said in 2011, “This growing wave threatens Israelis’ jobs, is changing the character of the country and we must stop it.”  That is what any true leader would say, if he or she desired to protect and preserve the concept of national identity.

Over the last several years, an inflow of illegal aliens from Africa led to major tensions within Israel over what to do about illegal immigration.  In Tel Aviv in 2012, a crisis of rising crime, disorder, and rape infuriated locals, and many saw the crisis as being brought on by the illegal aliens, called “illegal infiltrators” in Israel.  Over 1,000 local citizens demonstrated against what they saw as uninvited infiltrators, carrying signs that read: “Return them now,” and “If we keep silent we will become strangers in our own neighborhoods.”

The Tel Aviv protests intensified after several horrendous rapes.  In one, two African migrants were arrested for raping a 15-year-old, while a third held the victim’s boyfriend.  Several months later, demonstrations followed the rape of an 83-year-old Israeli woman.  The elderly woman, said police, “was raped and beaten for hours in the courtyard of her apartment building near the central bus station in south Tel Aviv by a young Eritrean migrant,” according to the Jerusalem Post.  Police were able to trace the assailant’s DNA because he had a prior arrest for trying to steal a woman’s bag.

Seventy-year-old Sophie Menashe of Tel Aviv reportedly says, “South Tel Aviv is South Sudan now. It’s no longer Tel Aviv[.] … And I’m scared all the time.”

Israel’s immigration and border protection policy is not simply based in security concerns.  Issues of crime and cultural cohesion also play a large role in shaping Israel’s approach to immigration.  That approach has included the construction of a sophisticated barrier fence, aggressive deportation, and the use of the military to protect the border.  The Israeli military has, over the last several years, turned away huge numbers of African asylum seekers, mostly from Eritrea and Sudan, at the border.  The Israeli army position is that it will act to “prevent illegal infiltration” as per “directives from the political echelon.”  Also, the Israeli cabinet devotes resources to enforce the law against illegal aliens and their employers.

Israel protects its border, motivated in part by an awareness of the great civilizational importance of national boundaries.  “Just like the Chinese protected themselves and defended themselves with the Great Wall,” PM Netanyahu says, “so we will continue to defend ourselves on the southern border, the Golan Heights and on all fronts.”

How, and why, has Israel enacted an effective border strategy, while we have not?  Israel is uniquely threatened by its immediate neighbors, but surely national defense is not the only reason to have an effective fence and a genuine border.  While it's true that our border would require a longer fence, the length of our borders is a reason to take illegal immigration seriously, not a reason to surrender our sovereignty.  Building an effective fence is just a matter of available technology and political will.  Put another way, the national will to survive – with a distinct national culture – is all it takes to justify a real border.

Posted in Immigration, Israel | Comments Off on Why Does Israel Protect Its Borders But America Doesn’t?

Australia Is Getting Less Australian

Every time I come back to Australia, it is less Australian. Though the country’s immigration program is the most sane in the world in that it only lets in people who can benefit the country economically, white Australians are steadily counting for less and less of the population percentage. Asians are smart, law-abiding and high achieving, and they are steadily taking over more and more of the universities and the country’s elite positions in medicine, law, finance and management. White Australia can’t keep up. Orientals are rapidly becoming Australia’s master class.

So when I walk around Australia, I see Asians out competing the native white Australians. I see Muslims walking around in full Islamic regalia. They’re often highly educated, an elite, and they’re reproducing much more rapidly than the average white Australian, who seems in decline even though his country has enjoyed 24 years of economic growth (the country has the world’s 12th largest economy).

Australia lets in about 6,000 refugees a year, including some from black Africa who are unlikely to assimilate into the country.

Many of the refugees and immigrants don’t give a toss about Australia, it is simply a better economic opportunity for them. They have no interest in assimilating into Australian norms. They don’t care about Australian history. They’re not part of the country’s tradition of mateship.

During WWII, Australia’s population was 99% white. Now it is down to about 90% (and most of the rest are Asian). The country’s census does not ask for race.

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on Australia Is Getting Less Australian