* When I was a kid I thought dykes were hot. Now that I have seem many of them, they could not be further from hot.
I remember one evening trying to share my experience, strength and hope with a young actress in need when I got blocked by a bull dyke. I was never trained to deflect the onrush of the bull dyke. Fearsome creatures!
* I have a weird rip in my shirt and when the shiksa points it out, I just say, “It’s a Jewish thing.”
* Is there anything weird that Orthodox Jews do during sex or is it just normal sex? Does it have to be completely dark? (Asking for a Reform friend.)
Chaim Amalek: “They do it through a hole in the bedroom wall. Man inserts his penis, woman on other side then must do the work. Numerous establishments in NY cater to them in this.”
Steven Rosenberg: “I’m still waiting for the posts that make me want to become more observant.”
Chaim Amalek Have you ever felt the joy of your rebbe’s smile? Once you have felt that inside you, there can be no other life for you.
Steven Rosenberg Rabbis smile?!
Chaim Amalek Inside, beneath their holy beards, yes. Also, if you were more observant, you would know what to do in the event your neighbor’s cow falls into a hole that you have dug on your property.
* Potential employers tell me I’m like a hot hooker — they want me but they can’t afford me.
* My therapist says I am very quick to kick people out of my life. I walk around with my finger on the button.
* Friend: “I figured out why you haven’t gotten married. Wasn’t too hard to figure out. You don’t want to marry a whore or a reformed whore. And those are usually the women who are interested in you. This is why you haven’t married anyone. You’re waiting for a pure woman.”
* Women have a certain amount of Action Jackson in them and most seem to use it up by age 28. I think they all get a limit, and once that is reached, they’re done. They’ve lost interest. Can’t be bothered. Sayanora.
* Do Muslims have not enough power in American media, just the right amount or too much? For how long will a tiny number of imams out of Mecca decide what appears in our movies and TV? Is it OK if I invite Allah to this FB discussion? Inshallah.
* I love it when people cry at my 12 step meetings, and most of the time, I haven’t even done anything. Crying relaxes me.
* There’s definitely been an increasing popularity and popularization of large butts recently. The idea that large butts are attractive and desirable has become more common and prominent in the mainstream media and culture and among whites and other non-blacks. More and more white and other non-black women today are trying to adopt the large butt look when that was largely unthinkable just 10, 15 years ago, when women were generally concerned about their butts being too big and sought slimmer figures. This seems to be tied to the ongoing Africanization of culture.
To tie this with the Coalition of the Fringes circular firing squad theme, Vogue Magazine published an article last year noting and hailing this large butt trend, which prompted outrage from some leftists who said that Vogue failed to acknowledge and credit black women for the large butt trend or something.
* I remember when Miley Cyrus made “twerking” a household word a couple years ago at the VMA and there was outrage that there wasn’t enough recognition that twerking had been invented by black people. Check: steam engine, twerking, electric light, twerking ….. etc. take your pick.
The entire episode smacks of racial elitism, body shaming, and something else really bad. Besides, I thought Malcolm Gladwell determined that if someone spends 10,000 hours trying to build up a big butt, they can; also, that the Big Butt Quotient (BBQ) is not racially but culturally determined.
Obviously, a shapely backside can be sexually alluring, that’s what we are programmed for, after all, but there are limits, and I wouldn’t have to shell out for the industrial strength toilet seat that it would require.
* Oh, come on guy, full female buttocks and tits (also known as “curves”) are sexually attractive to the majority of men and I understand that in places like Brazil women actually take steroids to increase their buttock size or have implants, and of course there are also padded panties available to round out underdeveloped buttocks. However huge non-shapely butts appended to lard-asses are just huge butts and not a lot of fun, though there are some men who have a fetish for them and fall for the cracks, or through the cracks.
On the converse side, skinny-ass titless women tend to lack attractiveness or at best have a kind of waifish quality like the Duchess of Cornwall or whatever her name is, but nobody really wastes much time thinking about bedding them.
I would say that the steatopygic Kimberly Kardashian is, or was once, attractive in a cartoonish way in spite of her oversize butt rather than because of it, although he rface is now so mutilated by her family tradition of plastic surgery that she is starting to look like the Wife of Frankenstein.
The tabloid media rejoices in huge butts in a kind of Beavis and Buttheaded way, but this is not to be taken seriously as an indication of what real men find sexually attractive.
* Funnily enough, the Tiananmen Square incident itself was precipitated by the Nanjing Anti-African Protests, which in turn were caused by black exchange students virtually monopolizing Chinese college chicks. To the point of actually locking themselves with said chicks for a massive orgy behind closed doors that may as well have had “no Chinese men allowed” signs hanging on them.
So in a sense, we have Nicky Minaj, Taylor Swift, and Communist China all with their panties in a knot over what ultimately can be traced back to the BBC. The world we live in.
Abstract: “Black Anality” argues that “black” and “anal” are rendered ideologically, discursively, and representationally synonymous, and that black female flesh becomes the material space on which this convergence occurs. Drawing on an archive of online, widely accessible black pornographies, I develop the term black anality to describe how black pleasures are represented as peculiarly and particularly oriented toward the anus, and thus as peculiarly and particularly attached to anal ideologies. In doing so, I depart from black feminist scholarship, which has long examined the buttocks as an imagined locus of racial-sexual difference and which has developed a set of analytics that now predominate in the study of black female sexualities: spectacularity, excess, grotesquerie, and display. “Black Anality” offers a new set of analytics for black feminist work on sexuality: spatiality, waste, toxicity, and filth. These analytics, I argue, allow black feminists to consider how black female sexuality is imagined to be rooted in (and perhaps generative of) certain kinds of filthy spaces, particularly the ghetto; how black sexuality is constructed as literally and metaphorically dirty; how black sexuality is posited as toxic, non-productive, and nonreproductive; and how black sexuality is imagined as wasteful. In turning attention to this understudied and overdetermining space — the black anus — “Black Anality” considers the racial meanings produced in pornographic texts that insistently return to the black female anus as a critical site of pleasure, peril, and curiosity.
Posted inBlacks|Comments Off on The Meaning Of Black Anality
A Jewish friend says: “Why try to be fair in an unfair world if it will eventually lead to your demise? Might is right. Muslims know this.”
WASP decency makes WASPs vulnerable to tribes unconcerned about the welfare of their host nation.
New York Times: An ant colony is an insect fortress: When enemies invade, soldier ants quickly detect the incursion and rip their foes apart with their oversize mandibles.
But some invaders manage to slip in with ease, none more mystifyingly than the ant nest beetle.
Adult beetles stride into an ant colony in search of a mate, without being harassed. They lay eggs, from which larva hatch. As far as scientists can tell, workers feed the young beetles as if they were ants.
When the beetles grow into adults, the ants swarm around them, grooming their bodies. In exchange for this hospitality, the beetles sink their jaws into ant larvae and freshly moulted adults in order to drink their body fluids.
…Scientists refer to ant nest beetles as social parasites. Instead of infecting a single host’s body, they hijack an entire society.
Posted inEvolution|Comments Off on A Social Parasite’s Sophisticated Mimicry
Yermie Kurkus writes on FB: This Shidduch Crisis is more of a Social Crisis found amongst the Orthodox circles. It is men and women who do not know what they want. In the non-religious and non-Jewish world – dating is for companionship, they simply don’t want to be alone, so they get together and 4-5 or 10 years later they decide to marry. However in the religious world, dating is for marriage. There is a very low education level on what marriage truly is! Women think, that the guy needs to be successful (what is that?) or a certain hight or weight or look. The men want certain barbie models or women with certain criteria – all are missing the point… What is marriage? What are the criteria, mindset or characteristics of what makes a marriage work? your hair color, belt size, shoe size? (thank God religious women cannot openly find out other “sizes”)… unsure emoticon I think that the moment women stop fantasizing on Vogue Magazine, and men stop looking for Victoria Secret models – this “crisis” will come to an end!
I’ve seen and heard it all at this point… the common denominator is that women (in my case) have absolutely no idea what marriage is and what they are looking for. They automatically judge on everything that is so external and irrelevant. They don’t even bother to communicate (a key ingredient to successful marriage – even if you don’t plan on marrying the guy) to find out more about a certain circumstance or situation that may seem (from the outside or on set) as a hurdle, they don’t even consider that perhaps it really is not an issue at all!
Again, in my case specifically, I am extremely accomplished and successful BH, I actually do come from a very prominent blood line (although not too famous) but notorious non-the-less (can be proven wink emoticon ) yet – I have heard every excuse under the sun why the woman would refuse dating or even properly looking into the Shidduch.
For example, there was one perfect profile that I approached – it was as though we have both copied and pasted each other’s profiles in the opposite fields (her looking for in my description and my looking for in her description) – our goals, mindset and characteristic matched 120% – yet she refused, she simply said no… with no excuse or reasoning! Ask for a reason and get ignored…!
Chaim Amalek: As I understand it, this problem is purely the result of one mathematical fact and one social fact about the demographics of these people: 1. It is a young and very fast growing population, with every age group slightly more numerous than the age group just preceding it. 2. Men prefer to marry women who are a few years younger than they. So every woman finds herself looking up at a cohort of men that is slightly smaller than the cohort of women to which she belongs. Hence the slight imbalance that they care calling a crisis. I think it impacts just a few percent who will be left out. Of course, if everyone married someone his/her age, this problem would vanish, as it would if males would occasionally marry someone a year or two older. And that’s that.
This works in reverse if you are a man born into a “baby bust” part of a demographic cycle, and want to have a family.
Posted inOrthodoxy|Comments Off on What Is The Shidduch Crisis?
“Conservatives now are telling us that we must curtail government, cut government spending, cut government powers, reduce government personnel for the sake of making individuals more free.
“Liberals, on the other hand, are still telling us, as they have for a long, long time, that in order to make individuals free, we must destroy communities. By communities I mean villages. Ghettos and cities. Ethnic groupings. Religious groupings. Anything which is segregated. We must destroy them. So that all individuals would be, if possible, identical. Including boys and girls.
“But the area of political action … in which you have government, individuals … three others: voluntary associations (which I’ll say no more about), corporations and communities. And if the liberals destroy communities for the sake of the individual, and the conservatives destroy the government for the sake of individuals, you’re going to have an area of political action in which irresponsible, immensely powerful corporations are engaged in opposition to individuals who are socially naked and defenseless.”
Comments to Steve Sailer:
* I like this quote. It shows the left and right wings are not diametrically apposed. They just force us to disrobe different clothes, with the ultimate result of having us naked on our hands and knees with our beneficent master behind us.
* There is an aspect of this that has intrigued me for years, and that is the Left’s need to define new ‘communities’ at the same time they are destroying the old ones. The ‘gay community’, the ‘trans community’, the ‘black community’, the ‘activist community’, etc.
I doubt this has a basis in Classic Marxist ideology. Perhaps it can be found in Cultural Marxist/Frankfurt/New School teachings. The theoretical need to oppose Hegemony on a group (ie ‘community’) basis, perhaps.
What I do know is that their clarion call is not Libertinism or Individualism per se. They preach alternative ‘communities’ … right up until one group of dissidents cannot live within the last alternative ‘community’ and splinters off to form another, e.g. the now-coalescing ‘trans community’ versus the ‘feminist community’.
Mind you, the end result is the same: complete individualism.
The ‘community’ concept is an almost completely left-centered notion. If you coopt their ‘community’ language from the right, they almost visibly gnash their teeth. Try talking about the ‘prison guard community’, the ‘pedophile community’, or the ‘gun community’ and listen to the reaction. For example: ‘As a member of the gun community, I am concerned that you …’
* Yes it is ONLY the White Normal areas that have to be broken up. No one says El Paso must be made more diverse. No one says Kenya needs a flood of White people.
But we are still having a hard time wrapping our head around the central truth of our time: These modern movements are anti-White. They are led by Whites who are anti-White.
For whatever reason, everyone runs from this obvious fact, I guess because they think it makes them Hitler to notice it.
* But things change. Viking warriors are now emasculated Swedes where the dad does exactly half the baby sitting. The Bundeswehr consists not of Teutonic warriors but of gay friendly oompah bands. Quiescent Hindoos run 1/2 of Silicon Valley. Putin doesn’t seem like a very docile Slav. Etc.
Ross reminds me of Walker, the president of MIT who wrote in the Atlantic in 1896 that we were making a big mistake letting in Italians, Jews, Hungarians, etc.:
“The entrance into our political, social, and industrial life of such vast masses of peasantry, degraded below our utmost conceptions, is a matter which no intelligent patriot can look upon without the gravest apprehension and alarm. These people have no history behind them which is of a nature to give encouragement. They have none of the inherited instincts and tendencies which made it comparatively easy to deal with the immigration of the olden time. They are beaten men from beaten races; representing the worst failures in the struggle for existence. Centuries are against them, as centuries were on the side of those who formerly came to us. They have none of the ideas and aptitudes which fit men to take up readily and easily the problem of self-care and self-government, such as belong to those who are descended from the tribes that met under the oak-trees of old Germany to make laws and choose chieftains.”
Boy, in the ’30s the Germans really showed a great flair for making laws and choosing chieftains.
The point is that “past performance is no guaranty of future results”. The same Hindoo who seems quiescent in his village may make a great tech executive once you clean him (or his grandchildren) up and get him an engineering degree. The Teutonic warrior may develop a taste for the settled life.
This is not to say that in the future Zulus and Quechas will fill the shoes of the former immigrants. It’s like dog breeding – all you can do is turn up traits that are already present but dormant. You can’t create new ones out of thin air. You can develop a dog that will retrieve ducks or dig for gophers but not one that will climb trees. There is no hidden pool of Mixtec geniuses waiting to be exploited like the shtetl talent that exploded in the 20th century (literally exploded – there would have been no Fat Man and no Little Boy without them).
But, once you put aside prejudice, you can see that, for example most Asians make great Americans and are no more incapable of integrating than the Italians and Jews who Walker thought unsuited for life in a democratic society.
* Northwest Europeans developed a way of co-operating on a large scale but at the cost of losing their ability to compete at the clannish scale – hence why their countries used to be so good (compared to most places).
Most other places are the opposite. They are good at the clannish scale but as a side effect they co-operate badly at a larger scale – hence why their countries suck.
If the two patterns are combined the clannish sub population(s) will pick a niche and very rapidly come to dominate that niche as they co-operate as extended families (clans) versus people competing as individuals or nuclear families. However too much / too many and the originally NW Euro type countries will simply collapse to the standard pattern (except with hundreds of different ethnic groups per region / country).
When Jews were the only high IQ relatively clannish (compared to NW Euros) sub population they had a unique advantage but increasingly they won’t.
(Although East Asians may figure out a third way as a result of watching the western collapse.)
* I go long, long stretches of time without thinking of Jews. There was another version of this country where they did very well at a number of things like business, entertainment, the sciences, and it wasn’t a secret or anything.
My biggest reaction would have been to grunt, and think “Good for them, whatever.” and forget about them for another long stretch of time.
But now, I really wonder how smart Jews are sometimes. Playing it my head I don’t think the changes that are coming to this country are going to be beneficial to them. Very much the opposite in fact.
Dunno, maybe I’m wrong and Jewish Central Command in Jerusalem knows exactly what it is doing. I kind of doubt it though, for a number of reasons to include Jewish Central Command existing.
I think it’s more a case of they’ve actually come to believe the BS. Maybe they always did.
Posted inPolitics|Comments Off on Sailer: If Liberals Undermine Community and Conservatives Undermine Government, Who Wins?
Blacks and latinos in general are never going to vote Republican because they consistently reside at the lowest ends of the socio-economic spectrum and want the maximum of government assistance. They’re never going to move up the spectrum because of low average IQs (85 and 90 respectively in the USA).
The following idea is nonsense: “That complexity of opinion is one reason why Republican strategists hope that with the right candidate — and a little bit of luck — they can reverse the pattern of Latinos voting overwhelmingly for Democrats. In New Mexico, where Latinos make up more than 40% of voters — more than any other state — Latino Republicans have made considerable gains, even though the state voted for President Obama in the last two elections.”
Posted inBlacks, Latino, Republicans|Comments Off on Blacks & Latinos Are Never Going To Vote Republican
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)
