JTA: Mindful of risks, European Jews urge aid to refugees

Nowhere in this story do I hear these pious Jewish leaders expressing concern about what a flood of Muslims into Europe will do to Europeans. All I hear is concern for the refugees and concern for Jews. But what about concern for the goyim? Don’t they have a right to defend their civilization?

These Jewish leaders prescribe the opposite for the goyim (diversity) from what I presume they seek for Jews (cohesion).

Where was this Jewish enthusiasm for illegal immigrants when it was Africans illegally entering Israel and taking up residence? How come Jewish groups did not have similar drive to facilitate that demographic takeover of a native population? Where were the rabbis speaking out for subsidizing and encouraging Africans to pour into Israel? How come open borders is a wonderful idea for goyim but a terrible idea for the Jewish state?

Just because a group, be they Jews or Muslims or leftists, invoke the language of universal moral norms does not mean that this is the true criteria underlying their actions. You would be smarter to look at how what they are advocating benefits their group.

Making it easier for Muslims to illegally enter Europe and America is explicitly seeking the destruction of Europe and America.

What’s right and wrong here largely comes down to a simple question — whose side are you on?

Every Major American Jewish Organization Including The Orthodox Union And Agudath Israel Supports Immigration Amnesty.

From JTA:

When he looks into the tired eyes of the Syrian refugees now flooding Europe’s borders, Guy Sorman is reminded of his father, Nathan, who fled Germany for France just months before Adolf Hitler came to power.

“He wanted to go to the United States. Visa declined. He tried Spain, same result. He ended up in France, neither welcome nor deported,” Sorman wrote last week in an Op-Ed in Le Monde in which he argued that Europe should learn from its abandonment of the Jews during the Holocaust and accommodate the stream of migrants pouring through its borders from the war-torn Middle East.

Sorman’s view is not uncommon among European Jews, many of them living in societies still grappling with a sense of collective guilt for their indifference to the Nazi genocide — or complicity in it. At a Holocaust memorial event in Paris on Sunday, French Chief Rabbi Haim Korsia urged Europe’s leaders to match the actions of non-Jews who saved Jews from the Nazis by welcoming Syrian refugees.

Yet as many European Jews rush to the refugees’ aid in word and deed, some worry that letting them stay may further contribute to the anti-Semitic violence driving Jews to leave Europe, much of it perpetrated by immigrants from the Middle East. Eager to exploit such fears, ISIS claimed in July that it had sent 1,000 fighters to infiltrate Europe as refugees.

“Some of these new immigrants — the Syrians and Iraqis especially — have been taught to hate Jews,” Henri Gutman, president of the left-leaning Belgian Jewish cultural group CCLJ, wrote in an Op-Ed published August 31 on the organization’s website. “We risk further increases in anti-Semitism.”

While urging “generosity” toward the refugees, Gutman said Europeans must observe “imperatives of defense” against Islamism. The Central Jewish Organization of the Netherlands, where two elderly Holocaust survivors were hospitalized recently following an assault by robbers who appeared to be Middle Eastern immigrants, spoke to a similar tension in a statement from its chairman, Ron van der Wieken.

While “aware that some Middle Eastern refugees harbor very negative feelings toward Jews … Jews cannot withdraw support from those in need and fleeing serious violence,” van der Wieken wrote. He urged Holland to devise a “charitable” refugee policy.

Such tension even exists for some of the hundreds of Jews helping the refugees on the ground in Hungary, Austria, Italy and beyond.

“As Eastern European Jews, we carry the knowledge of how it feels like to flee our homes,” said Zoltan Radnoti, the newly elected chairman of the rabbinical board of the Mazsihisz umbrella group of Hungarian Jewish communities. “Still, I help the refugees with fear that I am helping send danger to other Jews in Europe. I know some of the refugees may have fired on our [Israeli] soldiers. Others would have done so in a heartbeat. I know. But I am duty bound to help.”

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Holocaust, Immigration, Islam, Jews, Syria | Comments Off on JTA: Mindful of risks, European Jews urge aid to refugees

Rabbi Reuven Bulka Wants To Help Syrian Migrants Get A New Life In Canada

REPORT: “What we have here is a wellspring of positive energy that this committee hopes, with the help of the mayor as leader, to harness and to be ready when the avalanche comes of refugees coming here,” Rabbi Reuven Bulka said.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Rabbi Reuven Bulka Wants To Help Syrian Migrants Get A New Life In Canada

British Jewish Leaders Unite Behind Subsidizing Illegal Immigration

There’s not a word in the following article about Israel. Apparently, it is fine with the Jewish elites of Britain for the Jewish state to act in its self-interest by not taking in Islamic migrants who hate it. Apparently, it is fine for Jews to act in their group interest. Apparently, these Jewish leaders of Britain think it is just fine to support the import of millions of Muslims who want to destroy Europe and murder a ton of Jews along the way.

I wonder how many of these Jewish leaders of Britain plan to house Islamic migrants in their own homes? How do you think that would work out?

These Jewish leaders prescribe the opposite for the goyim (diversity) what they seek for Jews (cohesion).

The more you subsidize something, the more you get of it. So these Jewish leaders are subsidizing illegal immigration.

From The Jewish Chronicle of London:

Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis has pledged his support for the appeal saying Jews have a responsibility to respond to the humanitarian crisis.
He said: “Our heritage must inform the way that we respond. This is a deep and tragic humanitarian emergency.”
He urged the Jewish community to provide a “compassionate response at this great time of need.”
Rabbi Mirvis discussed the refugee crisis with Pope Francis at a private audience in the Vatican last week, describing it as “a profound challenge”.
Reform Judaism’s senior rabbi, Laura Janner-Klausner called on the community to support the WJR appeal.
She said: “When we look across at Calais and beyond, we see ourselves. I believe future generations will judge Britain against its response to today’s crisis.”
Rabbi Jonathan Wittenberg, senior rabbi of Masorti Judaism said: “We see with horror the pictures of the drowned, the hungry and the exhausted, and remember that only a generation ago our parents were refugees, desperate for somewhere to let them in and allow them to live.
“The question is therefore simply: ‘What can I do to help?’ Directed by the knowledge and skills of World Jewish Relief, we must respond with all the compassion, energy and generosity we can.”
Senior rabbi and chief executive of Liberal Judaism, Danny Rich, said: “World Jewish Relief will lead the immediate response of the Jewish community and I trust, using our unique experience, the community will follow through.”
Jews in Manchester were being directed to support the appeal by the community’s representative council.
Edie Friedman, director of JCORE, said it was important that British Jewry was seen to respond collectively to the crisis. She said: “It is hard to know what to do and, as a community, we want to do what is the most helpful, which is why we want a co-ordinated response.
“People know they can support the appeal and that will help internationally and then we will work out how we can best help refugees once in the UK.
“We don’t just want to accept these people – it is important they get the support they need to be here.”
She added that the community could have responded quicker to the problem: “JCORE have been warning about the crisis for some time. There is no easy answer but, as a community, those images should resonate with us.”
Finchley Progressive Synagogue’s Rabbi Rebecca Qassim Birk is leading a local Citizens UK campaign to get 50 Syrian refugees resettled in Barnet.
The interfaith group includes Rwandan, Syrian, Jewish and Catholic communities in Barnet who are organising homes, school places and doctors’ surgeries to support the refugees ahead of their arrival.
As part of the scheme, four Jewish landlords have offered to house refugees, 32 GP surgeries have offered to register refugees and five schools have committed to giving places to Syrian children.
Both Masorti and Reform movements held meetings on Monday. Nic Shlagman, community projects co-ordinator for West London Synagogue, told Reform members about the success of the synagogue’s drop-in centre for refugees. He said: “If anyone wants advice or help on how to set up their own one in their shul we can help with that.
“In the short-term, the camp in Calais still needs warm clothing for men, tents and sleeping bags. They also need people to help build shelters. We are co-ordinating a van of volunteers to go and help with that.”
Chief Rabbi Lord Sacks led calls for Britain to respond to the refugee crisis with a humanitarian gesture similar to the Kindertransport.
He said that Britain needed to take a more generous approach to accepting refugees.
Speaking on BBC2’s Newsnight programme, Lord Sacks said: “Some of the images we have seen in the last few days have brought back images that we thought we would never see again.
“They take our mind way back to the Holocaust and it is important to remember simple humanitarian gestures like the Kindertransport, which rescued 10,000 children in Germany.
“It was only 10,000 out of six million, but it lit a light in the darkest period of history.”
Former foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind said he was concerned that refuges were risking their lives trying to reach northern Europe having already arrived in a place of relative safety in Turkey.
The former Conservative MP, who is Jewish, said: “From a humanitarian point of view, I don’t blame anyone for wanting to seek out a better life in the north of Europe. But, from an asylum point of view, if you are in Turkey already you are not in danger, they are not going to lose their lives if they are in Turkey or Jordan.”
He added: “I have no doubt that we should be taking more people. It’s not just a problem for the UK. When you go back to the Second World War and the refugee crisis there, it involved large numbers of people going to Canada, Australia and the United States.
“We should be expecting other developed countries to be playing ball and there has been very little discussion around that.”
Speaking at the Holocaust Educational Trust annual dinner on Monday, Business Secretary Sajid Javid said: “Anyone who fled murderous extremism 75 years ago will find the refugee crisis we face today depressingly familiar.”
He added that it was “incumbent upon those of us who are more fortunate, to offer such men, women and children the safe haven they desperately need and they truly deserve.
“If we look the other way; if we say it’s nothing to do with us; if we say a refugee’s not welcome here because of his or her religion; then we are no better than those who tried to bar the door against Jewish refugees two generations ago.”
Labour MP Luciana Berger criticised the Prime Minister’s pledge to take in 20,000 refugees and said it lacked “ambition”.
Britain’s youngest Jewish MP attacked the slow response of the government and said, “it has done too little and taken too long to respond to this crisis”.
Ms Berger said: “It has failed to live up to Britain’s historic role as a country that offers asylum to those fleeing persecution and death.
“It has also failed to provide the leadership needed to help co-ordinate our response with other European nations.”

Posted in England, Immigration, Islam, Israel, Jews, Syria, Whites | Comments Off on British Jewish Leaders Unite Behind Subsidizing Illegal Immigration

Rabbi David Wolpe: The U.S. Has a Moral Obligation to Help Syrian Refugees

Rabbi David Wolpe writes:

Indifference is a betrayal of America’s founding mission

Moral clarity is important because moral decisions are often difficult. The easy choices that pose no risk—one should contribute to charity, help old people across the street, and be kind to children—these are not moral dilemmas. Today, with an estimated 4 million Syrian refugees streaming across the globe, we see a genuine moral crisis in the capitals of the West.

What makes this a moral dilemma is not only a claim on resources. It is also the lurking suspicion that we might be admitting people who, arriving from a region where terrorism and anti-Western feeling is rife, will end up causing harm…

But America was founded on the ideal of refuge. Indifference is a betrayal of its founding mission. The words on the Statue of Liberty cannot be an empty promise if we are to remain the great nation we have been for close to 250 years.

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me.

We cannot take everyone. We have to exercise caution when refugees arrive from a region that breeds anti-Western terrorists. But we remain that shining city on a hill. We must not close our arms to the world, or to the family on a raft, tempest-tossed, praying for safety. No country can afford to be all things to all people. Equally, this country cannot afford not to be America.

How many Islamic refugees would Rabbi Wolpe like on his block?

It’s a bad idea for Jewish elites such as Rabbi Wolpe to pervert the American idea to their own ends, claiming the mantle of Torah and of “universal moral values,” which can then be tossed aside whenever they’re inconvenient, such as in the application of these multi-cultural ideas to the Jewish state, which understandably does not want to import Islamic migrants who hate it (nor should any sane nation want such people).

No nation wants the world’s refuse.

As Benjamin Ginsberg wrote:

This historic background and the continuing relationship between Jews and the national government help explain one of the most notable characteristics of Jews in American politics: their strong adherence to liberalism, and especially to the Democratic Party, as loyal voters, leading activists, and major financial contributors. Geoffrey Brahm Levey has ascribed Jewish liberalism to the inherently humanistic character of Jewish values and traditions. This explanation seems somewhat fanciful, however, since in some political settings Jews have managed to overcome their humanistic scruples enough to organize and operate rather ruthless agencies of coercion and terror such as the infamous Soviet-era NKVD. (p. 14)

Posted in America, Immigration, Whites | Comments Off on Rabbi David Wolpe: The U.S. Has a Moral Obligation to Help Syrian Refugees

Rewarding Illegal Immigrants Destroys Host Countries

When Jewish organizations subsidize illegal immigrants to Europe and America, they are destroying Europe and America.

Notice how these organizations are not pushing for the destruction of the Jewish state with Muslims who hate it, but they assist in the destruction of Europe by showering aid on Islamic illegal immigrants.

Jerusalem Post: The refugee crisis has splashed across headlines in recent weeks as European governments are scrambling to deal with an influx of people arriving on their borders. A dialogue has also been triggered in the global Jewish community about what it can do to help, particularly in light of its own history as refugees seeking asylum from anti-Semitism. The Jerusalem Post reached out to Jewish aid organizations across the globe to find out what role they are playing to help refugees from Syria and the region.

Posted in Immigration, Islam, Jews | Comments Off on Rewarding Illegal Immigrants Destroys Host Countries

The Pain Of The Watermelon Joke

From the New York Times, a black woman writes:

But by the time I was 11 years old, even the smell of watermelon was enough to send me running to the bathroom with my most recent meal returning to my throat. It seemed I had grown violently allergic to the fruit.

I was a brown girl growing up in the United States. By that point in my life, I had seen the racist representations associated with African-Americans and watermelons, heard the terrifying stories of black men being lynched with watermelons hanging around them, watched black migrants from the South try to eke out a living in the big city by driving through neighborhoods like my own — Bushwick, in Brooklyn — with trucks loaded down with the fruit.

In a book I found at the library, a camp song about a watermelon vine was illustrated with caricatures of sleepy-looking black people sitting by trees, grinning and eating watermelon. Slowly, the hideousness of the stereotype began to sink in. In the eyes of those who told and repeated the jokes, we were shuffling, googly-eyed and lesser than.

Perhaps my allergy was actually a deep physical revulsion that came from the psychological impression and weight of the association. Whatever it was, I could no longer eat watermelon.

Comments to NYT:

* Clearly a demon she wrestles with. We don’t pick our demons; they seem to pick us. I am less curious about why she wrote this piece and more about why the Times chose to run it. What discourse does it advance? Misconceptions about whom we let in to our circle of friendship where familiarity pricks the balloons of sensitivity or self importance generally come up when we realize that some things still sting. Ms Woodson does her friend the disservice of lack of honesty at the outset or lack of loyalty at the end of this story. I feel more sorry for her dilemma than for her story.

* I’m a non-white immigrant who has been in this country for most of my life. There are many like me who are tired of this incessant emphasis of the NYT on all things black and racist. Authors (such as this one in the article) who write about this are published and lauded, movies about this are praised, and incidents involving this are blown out of all proportion. The current perception is that if it does not have a race angle, it won’t appear in the NYT. The liberal white guilt is nauseating. There are many other facets to America and American history, and we need to go forward as one people in a society where race does not matter, but culture does.

* It’s pretty clear we need a law that stops all remarks with any ethnic content that could offend or displease anyone — no more Scottish jokes, Irish jokes, cowboy jokes, etc. This would probably be illegal:
“And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or …”

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on The Pain Of The Watermelon Joke

High Trust Vs Low Trust Societies

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Hungary has been fighting Muslim invasions for over 500 years. Hungary has experienced the conflict and eventual collapse of three multicultural empires, the Ottoman Empire, Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Soviet Empire. The EU is likely Hungary’s fourth bite at the apple of being in a multi-cultural empire.

Hungary is also a lower trust, more diverse society, which likely knows the precarious status of civil society. Iceland is high trust and homogenous without much experience with diversity or civil strife.

* The majority of union workers in the US now are employed by various government bureaucracies. Mass migration now may actually expand job opportunities for union workers in public sector bureaucracies relating to welfare, immigration and law enforcement. Mass immigration is no longer viewed as competition, but an aggregate demand stimulus for government expansion.

* The problem (in Hungary and Romania if not in Finland) is that a lot of people seemed to equate “Bolshevik” with “Jewish”. While there certainly were Jewish Bolsheviks, especially in the early days, not all Bolsheviks were Jews nor (by far) were all Jews Bolsheviks. A lot of Hungarian Jews identified very strongly as Hungarian patriots. Stalin himself was no Jew lover in his later years. But a lot of locals took the war against Bolshevism as a license to oppress their local Jewish population. Not only were hundreds of thousands shipped off to be gassed at Auschwitz with the cooperation of the local authorities, but many of the local Jewish men (while not trusted to serve in the military itself) were conscripted as forced labor to dig trenches, etc. on the Eastern front lines where they were treated very poorly.

What happened to Hungarian Olympic fencer Attila (note the super patriotic Hungarian name) Petschauer was unfortunately all too illustrative.

These atrocities were committed by the Hungarians themselves without needing any encouragement from the Germans.

I don’t envy the position of the nations of central Europe in the 40′s – caught between the devil of Hitler and the deep blue sea of Stalin. They really had no good choices. But I’m not sure taking it out on the local Jewish population was really the right move.

* The Bela Kun thing probably didn’t help. But there might have been other things that made the locals dislike the Jews. The Spanish felt the Jews collaborated with the Moors, the Ukrainians thought they had helped the Poles oppress them, and the Greeks thought they had helped the Turks collect the child tax. I don’t know much about Hungarian history, but there are probably grievances the locals have.

This is the problem you have when a group remains separate from the society at large. Whether the separate group is Jewish or some other ethnic group like Germans, if they are perceived as separate from the main group and of helping other groups oppress the main group, then they will be a target.

* There were a lot of reasons for “East Europeans” to be allied with Nazi Germany, and, for that matter, for a lot Europeans to support Nazism, without at the same time supporting the persecution and murder of Jews.

The fascist Arrow Cross of Hungary was responsible for a certain number of Jewish deaths, and perhaps also Rumania but I think Finland was largely guiltless, as far as the Holocaust goes. But before we even begin to blame things on Finland, let’s not forget that Stalin declared war on them first.

* The Jewish connection was not only with Bolsheviks. If you were a leftist, or a fascist with a social bent in favor of nativist worker’s rights (like Codreanu’s Iron Legion, which I have recently learned has an oddly large Internet fan base abroad), then you were also against exploitative capitalism. Jews figured prominently there as well. It all comes down to power and the Other.

* The megaphone is turned on when the Hungarian Jobbik camerawoman is filmed (and fired for) tripping the old man carrying a child, but the megaphone is turned off when, just moments before, the same woman was (on film) almost knocked over herself by waves of charging immigrants, who were charging past police containment lines (and therefore, in essence, breaking the law.) Hers was a futile attempt to aid the police in stopping those migrants who were escaping. Nothing more. But there was a little kid crying over his fall, and that’s all that matters.

* I am not sure why German companies don’t realize that their reputation for quality comes from their German workers. Replacing German for Syrian or Turkish quality will do the same for their reputation and profits as the crappy quality US auto makers were known for did for theirs.

* My new tactic when discussing race/migration/invasion with SJW types: I declare myself as racist and call them such also. I point out that like me) they live in predominantly white and protected neighborhoods, 2) and have close to zero black/brown “friends” on their Facebook feed, etc…If I consider myself racist by such markers then there is no reason they should not be considered racist also.

Now, I have no idea whether these SJWs do live in protected white areas or whether or not they have any colored Facebook “friends”, no matter. To a man and woman they all become flustered, defensive and are at a loss for words. They stammer on that such markers are not determinative, etc. I insist that they are. Being objectively assessed as racist breaks their tender hearts. Everytime I use this tactic it has a satisfying effect. Make the SJWs eat their “personal is political” mantra till they choke on it.

MORE COMMENTS:

* The bizarre thing about Juncker’s position in all this is that he sees it as perfectly natural and morally acceptable for foreigners to fight to enter another nation to reach safety but morally wrong for the inhabitants of that nation to resist the influx to preserve their safety and way of life.

Given that Muslims have a demonstrated record of violence and intolerance in Europe the balance between the two competing interests has to favor the people of Europe in blocking the influx of foreigners especially as there are alternatives such as camps in Turkey, Jordan or even in Greece, which could use the money and jobs involved in holding these people if the EU would pay for it.

* In any other age, a large group of males between the ages of 18 and 40 crossing a border into a foreign country would be rightly considered an army on campaign – an invasion. Why is it any different now?

Posted in Diversity, Immigration | Comments Off on High Trust Vs Low Trust Societies

Replication Failure In Psychological Research

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I have long wondered whether psychologists’ ideological refusal to recognize group differences undermined the bulk of these studies. They rarely identify the race or ethnicity of subjects and blindly assume that these factors would not have any effect on the outcome. It seems very unlikely. The replication failure may be linked to this, at least on some significant level.

* I think two other major factors are affecting the reproducibility of psychology studies, and social sciences studies generally. First, there’s an enmeshment between popular outlets that publicize these studies’ results, and the scientists who perform the studies. The scientists want the publicity of having their study referenced in some magazine, and the magazine writers love having the veneer of Science fronting for their biases. This puts pressure on the research to find “interesting” results, rather than particularly honest ones – and this is especially true if the study can be related to political alignments, however spuriously (see e.g. “Conservatives scare easily”). The second factor is the biases of the scientists themselves. It’s been repeatedly shown that social science peer groups have remarkably similar worldviews. This of course pushes results away from the unfettered truth, toward an ideologically preferable one. There is research about this that has been published, particularly by Haidt et al. Although who knows if it will prove reproducible.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on Replication Failure In Psychological Research

No Evidence of Racial Discrimination in Criminal Justice Processing

Abstract: One of the most consistent findings in the criminological literature is that African American males are arrested, convicted, and incarcerated at rates that far exceed those of any other racial or ethnic group. This racial disparity is frequently interpreted as evidence that the criminal justice system is racist and biased against African American males. Much of the existing literature purportedly supporting this interpretation, however, fails to estimate properly specified statistical models that control for a range of individual-level factors. The current study was designed to address this shortcoming by analyzing a sample of African American and White males drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Analysis of these data revealed that African American males are significantly more likely to be arrested and incarcerated when compared to White males. This racial disparity, however, was completely accounted for after including covariates for self-reported lifetime violence and IQ. Implications of this study are discussed and avenues for future research are offered.

Posted in Blacks, Crime, IQ, Race | Comments Off on No Evidence of Racial Discrimination in Criminal Justice Processing

Islam Is Not A Good Fit For America & Europe

John Derbyshire says: Mention of Razib Khan brings us to Islam, the religion of Razib’s ancestors. In fact, if I remember right, Razib’s grandfather was an Imam, and Razib himself got part of his education in a Madrassah.

I’ve stated Radio Derb’s position on Islam before, and I’ll state it again now. We have nothing against Islam. It seems like a fine religion that’s given spiritual support and consolation to millions of people across hundreds of years. Jolly good luck to Islam.

The evidence is plain, however, that Islam is not a good guest in non-Islamic countries. A wise country that is not Islamic in its culture and traditions will not permit mass settlement by Muslims. It’s just asking for trouble.

Muslims have plenty of countries of their own. Plenty — 57 listed on the website of the
Organization of Islamic Cooperation, from Afghanistan to Yemen. Forty-nine of those countries have Muslim majorities. Any Muslim who wants to move to another country is spoiled for choice. Any Western nation that allows mass settlement by Muslims is being very foolish, given the trouble caused by a fanatical minority of Muslims. 9/11 should have made that point beyond dispute.

It didn’t, of course, and Western nations, I think without exception, continue in the gross folly of permitting mass settlement by Muslims.

On Monday this week Daniel Horowitz at Conservative Review wrote about the breathtaking scale of that folly in the particular case of the U.S.A. Using statistics from the Department of Homeland Security [laugh] Horowitz shows that the pace of immigration from Muslim countries has doubled since 9/11. From 2001 to 2013 more than 1.6 million people from predominantly Muslim countries were issued green cards for permanent settlement in the U.S.A.

Heading the list of nations there: Pakistan, which has settled over 200,000 people here since 9/11; Iran, 167 thousand; Nigeria and Bangladesh, 150 thousand each …

One point six million. As Horowitz says, if only ten percent are jihadists, that’s 160,000 jihadists. If only one percent are, that’s still sixteen thousand.

True, not every immigrant from a Muslim-majority nation is a Muslim. Still, not every immigrant from a non-Muslim nation is a non-Muslim, either. Some proportion of immigrants from Britain, France, and India are Muslims. So that’s a wash.

As Horowitz also said, this is just the numbers for green cards issued — immigrant-status visas. Huge numbers of non-immigrant visas have also been issued. Student visas, for example. Saudi Arabia
alone
was granted 54,000 student visas during the 2013/14 academic year. That’s almost a thousand percent increase since 9/11. A thousand percent! Eleven times as many as when Saudi nationals flew planes into the World Trade Center!

This is sheer insanity. We gain nothing from the mass immigration of Muslims — nothing but danger for our citizens, and an increase in surveillance by our security agencies, with corresponding de-crease in our liberties. Our immigration policy is nuts. It’s crazy. Quote
from Daniel Horowitz, quote:

Who voted for these policies? When did the American people ever have the opportunity to give input through a transparent process to the radical transformation of America? How many Americans would have supported a decision post-9/11 to roughly double the rate of Islamic immigration?

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on Islam Is Not A Good Fit For America & Europe