Salon: Ann Coulter unleashes her nativist fury on Pope Francis and Catholics: “This is why our founders distrusted Catholics”

Salon.com: As Pope Francis paid a visit to the White House this morning, opening his remarks to 11,000 ticketed guests by noting that immigrants helped build the United States of America, the conservative flamethrower greeted His Holiness with a series of ugly nativists tweets, claiming Pope Francis’ teachings on economics are why the nation’s founding fathers excluded Catholics from citizenship, seemingly excusing anti-Catholic bigotry.

Coulter’s tweet was in response to one by fellow conservative commentator and Rush Limbaugh’s brother, David, chiding Pope Francis for speaking out against economic inequality:

Posted in Catholics | Comments Off on Salon: Ann Coulter unleashes her nativist fury on Pope Francis and Catholics: “This is why our founders distrusted Catholics”

Why Donald Trump Troubles The Republican Establishment

Ann Coulter writes: A majority of elected Republicans, their advisers, conservative magazines and newspapers are nothing but junior partners to the left. They go on TV and repeat prepackaged conventional wisdom, hoping to get at least a small ovation. Trump is popular because we now live in a Kardashian nation and are one big cult of celebrity!

By mounting only impotent opposition, professional Republicans win the admiration of The New York Times, as they turn our country over to the left. All that matters is that they get to keep their offices, their salaries and their friends.

It’s important for them to think of themselves as better than other people—especially those yahoo proletarian conservatives.

Ironically, it’s the Ivy League billionaire living a glamorous New York City life who has rocked the political world by speaking for ordinary Americans and insulting the powerful. Meanwhile, depressingly average Washington insiders insult ordinary Americans and suck up to the powerful.

When someone like Trump comes along and is actually serious about winning the very causes the GOP purportedly seeks to advance, he is seen as a disruptive force.

Most alarmingly, Trump brought up immigration. The Democrats thought they had this one in the bag—they’d worked it all out with Republicans! Both sides had agreed: I won’t talk about it if you won’t.

The decision has already been made: We aren’t going to ask the American people what they think. We’re just going to do this because we think we’re right, and at a certain point it will be impossible to reverse, because Republicans will never be able to win another national election.

The transformation of our country has been a deliberate, methodical process, carefully hidden from the public.

Until Trump started talking about immigration, most Americans had no idea that immigrants take more government assistance than natives, that we are allowing nearly half a million anchor babies a year to force their way into citizenship and a lifetime of welfare, and that we’re bringing in rapists, murderers and terrorists.

Immigration is an easy argument to win. But if you talk about it, the media will cut your mike.

Once the Democrats get the voters they want through immigration, they will be like kids in a candy store. What will they do first? Ban private ownership of guns? Strip Christian churches of their tax exemptions for being “homophobic“? Release criminals from prison? Imprison the police? It will be the LBJ and Carter administrations rolled into one for all time, without end.

All the debates we have now on talk radio and cable news will be completely irrelevant. The most left-wing policies imaginable will be enacted, with no opposition—as they are today in California.

You might think California would wake up even the utter mediocrities in the Republican Party. But their predictable little lives have been disrupted. That’s why Trump has them in a panic.

Posted in Ann Coulter, Donald Trump, Immigration | Comments Off on Why Donald Trump Troubles The Republican Establishment

The Lessons Lost in the Aftermath of Ann Coulter’s F-Bomb

It increasingly looks like Ann Coulter is going to ride out this controversy. She’s getting support from some Jews.

Susan Goldberg writes: For all of those folks outraged at Ann Coulter’s “f-ing Jews” Tweet during the last Republican debate, I have one simple question: Where were you in 2007 when Ann Coulter expressed the belief that Jews needed to be “perfected” into Christians? There are two cardinal sins goyim can commit: Using the phrase “f-ing Jews” and proclaiming a belief that Jews need to convert to Christianity. Ann has broken both. So, what’s the difference between 2007’s offense and today’s?

…But that was then and this is now, an era in which we receive and express outrage in 140 characters or less. Which is why the 2004 study illustrating a link between illegal immigration and anti-Israel views tweeted by Ann was sadly ignored. An essential point missed because, like, what does Israel have to do with Mexico? Most conservatives are too busy connecting Ann with Donald Trump and Donald Trump trends higher than Israel and Mexico combined.

Which leads one to ask, was Ann’s “f-ing Jews” a clever way to address the Republican/Israel/immigration trifecta by feeding off of the buzz created by Trump’s anti-Semitic supporters? Perhaps. The woman is in tune with the conservative world, after all, and let’s admit her timing couldn’t have been more precise. As a Jew I’ll agree that the phrase “f-ing Jews” is the equivalent of the N-word: You just don’t say it. To paraphrase Walter Sobchak, 5,000 years of persecution, you better believe you don’t drop the term “f-ing Jews.” But, I’ll also agree with my fellow Jewish conservative Ben Shapiro: Ann Coulter is still a better supporter of Israel than the pro-Obama Jewish hypocrites currently mocking her. And that is another point lost in the mire of the f-bomb.

I don’t agree with Ann’s support of Trump. But I can’t think of one single conservative with whom I agree on everything, because that’s what adults do: Critically think, not idol worship. Which is why Sarah Rumpf’s echo of the conservative declaration “Ann broke my heart” is especially absurd…

Jonah Goldberg’s essay at NRO “encouraged and emboldened” Twitter users with anti-Semitic views. Does Rumpf, an avid anti-Trumper, believe Goldberg should’ve just kept his mouth shut and played nice, too? What kind of Coulter fan is Rumpf, anyway? One that watched her Barbie in sexy heels on mute for the past 15 years?

I once observed that Ann’s “sarcastic jabs often got her into more trouble than her actual argumentation.” The problem isn’t Ann, it’s us. Instead of using jabs to make an argument, we’ve traded in arguments for jabs. Ann is not made for those who’ve pandered down the Twitter hole. Nor is she designed for those seeking to worship idols instead of cultivate their own opinions. Conservatives who aren’t afraid to think critically can still pull the meat from the fat of Ann’s arguments. Did Republican candidates pander to the same old tropes in that debate? Yes. Are they ignoring the realities of immigration policies, in particular the impact they have had and will have on American political attitudes towards Israel? Yes. So, what’s your f-ing problem, again?

Despite what my PJ colleague Rick Moran thinks, Ann is far from over. She not only took advantage of the Right’s seedy underbelly of anti-Semitism, she called attention to their faux anti-Israelism to boot, and all while addressing the issue of illegal immigration. And in the world of social media, we would have missed all of that if she hadn’t Tweeted about the “f-ing Jews.” That’s sad commentary, indeed. For the rest of us that is, not for Ann.

Posted in Ann Coulter | Comments Off on The Lessons Lost in the Aftermath of Ann Coulter’s F-Bomb

The Power Of The Christian Right!

If we can openly discuss the power and influence of the Christian Right in America (in public education, public space, politics), why can’t we openly discuss the power and influence of the Saudi Lobby and of Jews, Chinese, etc?

Chaim Amalek: “Because we tell you not to, that’s why. We can discuss this in shul tomorrow. There will be lots of time.”

Luke: If Ann Coulter survives and does not back down from her comments about Jews and Israel, does that mean there is a tidal wave of more caustic criticism of Jews is about to flow over America?

Chaim Amalek: “I’m afraid so, which is why she MUST BE RUINED.”

I think that all groups, including Jews, benefit from accurate criticism and appropriate stigma. All groups have strengths and weaknesses and unique gifts and it is not hate to accurately and publicly point that out. For instance, in general and by comparison with other groups, Jews are good at business, good at negotiating, good at academics, good at making money, good at developing group cohesion, good at exercising political and cultural influence, good at telling stories and making entertainment.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Jews | Comments Off on The Power Of The Christian Right!

Islamist Jihadist from Britain Kvetches About His Syrian Co-workers

Steve Sailer writes: Liam Deacon in Breitbart’s has alerted us to this posting by a British Ali G-type, a supermarket security guard, who has gone off to Syria to engage in jihad (apparently he’s currently with ISIS, although, admittedly, I have a hard time keeping straight which Syrian terrorist organization is which). But he has a few things to get off his chest about his Syrian hosts that ought to be of interest to Europeans currently besieged by Syrians and pseudo-Syrians.

Although I realize that all the smart money thinks that Ms. Merkel has pulled off a huge economic coup by inviting in vast numbers of Syrians, after reading this you might want to think about shorting Audi and Mercedes-Benz stocks.

Culture Clash: Understanding The Syrian Race
By Abū Sa’eed Al-Britānī (From the video, “Message Of A Mujāhid”)

Arabs as a whole have a unique culture, which differs dramatically from the western lifestyle. If one is unaware of these cultural differences, then it could be quite peculiar, annoying, and at times somewhat stressful to interact and associate with them. Arabs are quite unique in their habits, so it is vital for the western Muhājir to acquaint himself with their cultures to prevent clashes and disputes.

Below I shall list a few of their habits which Arabs are known for:

1) A lack of privacy for other’s space

This is a common habit for Arabs in the Middle East. I remember an incident from when I first came to Shām; I was sitting in ribāt next to another British brother, and as we were talking a Syrian brother came into the room and sat between me and the brother, he then reached for my backpack and opened it. The brother didn’t ask my permission but apparently that was not needed as it’s the habit of Arabs to go through other people’s property without their permission. As I sat there, he took out all my clothes and other gear from my backpack and examined each item before placing it on the floor.

As he was doing this, I was speaking to the other British brother asking him what was going on, and he told me that this was the norm here in Syria. Initially, I thought this was just a one off incident, but as time went on I realised this was a habit of our Arab brothers.

On another occasion an Indonesian brother was working on his laptop and was using it to speak to his family (or friends) back in Indonesia. After some time he went to go eat so he left his laptop open not expecting anything to happen, as no one really goes through other people’s property without permission, right? Wrong! As he was in the other room eating, an Arab brother went through his laptop and deleted all his conversations the brother was having with his family on his Messenger service. He also deleted his web server and was browsing the net without hesitation.

When the Indonesian brother returned and realised what happened, he got upset and thereafter put a password on his laptop.

Another common trait is that they see no issue in unplugging your mobile phone to charge their own phone. Even if it’s your own charger, they would casually take your phone off charge to charge their own phone, even if there is no real need for them to charge their phone at that current time.

During my time with Arabs, I have only noticed one Syrian brother who asked permission before going through my bag, and due to him asking permission I allowed him to go through my stuff, even though I didn’t like it.

Arabs in general do not know where the red line is in giving another brother his space, and this is in their culture, maybe because they see this as a form of strong brotherhood. Whatever the reason it’s annoying so patience is required. …

3) Stealing shoes

In the west, it is common knowledge to walk out of a room wearing the same pair of shoes that you wore while entering the room. Nay, it is common sense. However here in Shām, our Syrian brothers have a very peculiar philosophy whereby they believe that everyone can share each other’s footwear, irrespective of foot size. Someone who is a size 40 will casually walk out the room wearing your footwear even though you are a size 44, and strangely he may not even realise. Weird? Of course it is.

From my very first month here in Shām, I would experience this; I would enter a room with my shoes, and when leaving I would notice my footwear was missing. This is too common here in Shām. For some reason (known best to Syrians), what’s yours is theirs and what’s theirs is yours, even if you disagree with it. …

6) Administration work (“Bukrah inshāAllāh”)

As Westerners we are naturally good at administration work as our whole life is based on an organised structure. From school days to work life, we have a systematic structure in place on how to deal with issues. In every system we have the hierarchy structure. For example, in school we have the teacher above us, above whom is the deputy head, above whom is the head teacher. Everyone has a role to play in the system and everyone knows his job role in the organisation.

Unfortunately in the Arab world, building a structure and administrating it is not one of their strong points. There are many flaws and errors in putting an Arab in charge, especially if he is uneducated (which sadly is the majority).

It is common to hear an Arab in administration reply with the words “bukrah inshāAllāh” (which means “hopefully tomorrow”) or in plain English, “I’m too lazy, leave me alone and come back some other time!”Unfortunately, Arabs run the system here in Shām and they are, from what is apparent, the laziest and unfit for their jobs. All praise is due to Allāh that Dawlah has a system in place, however with Arabs running it, it has many deficiencies.

The typical Arab in administration tends to be very lazy. As explained above, the phrase “bukrah inshāAllāh” is always said as a cover when they cannot be bothered to do anything. …

Another ‘great’ feature of Arabs in administration is that there is no queue in any of their offices. You could be waiting in line for half an hour and then another Arab would come and push in the queue and go straight in. Even more ironic is that he would even barge in front of the guy who is speaking to the admin. It’s not unusual for Arabs to push in nor is it unusual for them to interrupt you while you’re speaking to the admin. And because the admin is also an Arab he also sees no issue in another person interrupting you. Strange indeed how he can be speaking to you one second, listening to your concern, and then totally ignore you and talk to another guy who just pushed in and deal with his case, even though this new guy may take about 10 or 20 minutes of his time; and when he finishes dealing with him, he will look at you, and without apologising expect you to remind him of everything you were saying.

So what is the solution to dealing with Arabs in administration? The solution is twofold. Number one; to pray to Allāh that He replaces the Arabs with others who know what they are doing. Number two; and a more practical solution, is to shout at them while asking for what you need. Although this may sound quite harsh, this is the only solution, and many westerners have learnt this the long and hard way….

The brothers from Chechnya are likewise very good at this. The Arabs are very scared of our brothers from Chechnya as they always raise their voices when speaking to Arabs in administration.

Not only do chicks dig Chechens, but lazy, disorganized, incompetent Arab bureaucrats are terrified of them. So, Europe can look forward to a future in which acting like a Chechen maniac is the best way to get ahead in life. In once what was the land of Kant, Ramzan Kadyrov looks like the future.

Arabs in administration is a recipe for disaster. …

8) The staring competition

This one is very amusing. Syrians love to stare at foreigners, maybe because no tourist has ever visited Syria. …

9) Treating animals badly …

10) Beggars

From the very moment I arrived in the Turkish airport, I was greeted by Syrian beggars. Professionals who make a living off of other people’s generosity and kind-heartedness. In the airport you may be confronted by a ‘poor’ Syrian man who is trying to get enough money to book a flight to another country. These beggars are professionals and it is advised not to give them anything, not even a second glance.

When people first come to Shām they are somewhat naive and inexperienced with beggars so they may give a lot of money to a professional beggar. Most beggars here in Syria are fraudsters who take advantage of the Muhājirīn. …

11) Dealing with shop keepers
Here in Syria Dawlah has a reputation of being wealthy. The average Syrian looks at a Dawlah brother as a walking bank, and unfortunately shop keepers are no exception. So many times when asking a shop keeper for the price of an item, he would contemplating for a while then give you a higher price.

This is something which every single Dawlah brother has experienced. Wherever Dawlah goes, shop keepers benefit. No doubt there are those who are honest merchants, yet sadly they are few. The vast majority are money-lovers who think we are unaware of their petty actions. …

12) Driving ‘skills’

Coming from the west, we have certain rules and regulations which we abide by while on the road. These are for our own benefit to prevent accidents and henceforth, complications. In the Arab world however, there are not that many rules for the highway, and one can easily obtain a driving license without any test. Yes I know, very scary indeed!

… It is also a habit for motorists to drive on the opposite side of the road, even if the road is only wide enough for one car. For those of us coming from the west the road can be very stressful at times. …

The above mentioned traits should not deter a person from coming to Jihād, for not all Arabs are like this; we have many European battalions which one can join if he finds it problematic, in fact I would strongly advise my Western brothers to join a non-Arab battalion if the above mentioned traits are something one cannot live with.

These are pretty much the same observations as T.E. Lawrence made about Arabs in The Seven Pillars of Wisdom over 90 years ago, and he was infatuated with Syrians, literally.

Posted in Immigration, Islam | Comments Off on Islamist Jihadist from Britain Kvetches About His Syrian Co-workers

WP: Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism.

Gil Steinlauf is the senior rabbi at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington, D.C. He writes:

Adapted from a Rosh Hashanah sermon delivered at Adas Israel Congregation.

This summer, I had a conversation with a young woman about her Jewish identity. She told me how she grew up in a family that was very involved in her synagogue. She went to Jewish day school. She had been to Israel multiple times. But she felt very far from her Jewishness. She simply couldn’t find the relevance of Judaism as she was making her way on her own in the world. I asked her what she did feel passionate about. She told me she has been reading and thinking a lot about racial justice. What moved her was the #BlackLivesMatter movement — how, in light of Ferguson, Charleston and seemingly endless incidents of injustice against black people in our society, she felt a need to grapple with the racism that is so pervasive in this country and how it affects her identity.

“As a white woman,” she said, “as the product of so much white privilege, it makes me all the more angry to see how other white people so blindly and carelessly feed into the racial climate of our society.” “So the fact that you are white makes this issue all the more painful, all the more personal for you?” I asked. “Yes,” she said.

I certainly identified with her angst. I find the reality of American racism unbearable: the legacy of slavery; the institutional discrimination that is so pervasive; the scourge of mass incarceration of black Americans, with its collateral damage on families; the ongoing blight of housing segregation; the role of law enforcement in furthering racist systems and hierarchies; all this, and so much more. My answer to her, and my answer for all American Jews during these Days of Awe, is that finding our true Jewish identity can begin by questioning our whiteness.

In a flawed and racist society, we Jewish Americans are prospering, reaching the top echelons of privilege and power. With racism and injustice entrenched year after year, generation after generation, we must now ask ourselves: What role do we play in that injustice now that most of us live as white people in America? We must cease to consider ourselves to be part of the social construct of whiteness, despite all the white privilege that America affords us, privilege that eluded many of our parents and grandparents. Starting in this new year of 5776, we must teach our children that we are, in fact, not white, but simply Jewish.

The great blessing and promise of America to our ancestors was that it was a land of opportunity, where we are all recognized as equal, where nothing, not even the heavens, is beyond our reach. We all know that the saga of Jews in America is a stunning success story. Our success here is built on the efforts of the first generations of American Jews who struggled mightily to assimilate — to slough off the ways of the old country, to out-American the Americans. In many ways, today it’s difficult for us to appreciate how remarkable this success is.

Well into the 20th century, we Jews were barred from the whitest country clubs. We couldn’t buy houses in the whitest neighborhoods. Even today, some of us remember being called anti-Semitic names, having pennies thrown at us or being beaten up because we are Jewish. But that young woman I spoke with this summer, and most of her young adult Jewish peers today, can hardly fathom being singled out, being treated as “other,” because of their Jewishness. And the main reason why anti-Semitism is no longer mainstream in our society is because sometime in the last half century, we convinced America that we, too, are white.

All those years of singular focus on making it in America paid off! Our achievements in business, in medicine, in the arts, in government, in all circles of American life have resulted in success and security rarely known to our wandering ancestors. The history of my own synagogue in D.C., Adas Israel Congregation, mirrors the history of Jews in our country. Over a century ago, its founders dreamed of one day building what they referred to as a “great Cathedral synagogue” standing tall and proud in our nation’s capital, as powerful as the great American monuments of this city. By this spring, the president of the United States was visiting their congregation to give a speech and visit with preschool kids.

These days, the country clubs and exclusive neighborhoods are as Jewish as they are WASPy. Indeed, we Jewish people have been building a great, shining American tower, and we have just about reached the highest heavens. But in our own century, we are waking up to the fact that our astounding success in America is a Pyrrhic victory. Our own children and grandchildren, raised as white American children of privilege, have completely forgotten who built their place in society, or why their well-meaning ancestors so passionately endeavored to build it. Many no longer value their essential Jewishness in their worldviews or life plans. For most, the success built by American Jews is indistinguishable from general American white, privileged success. That young woman was right in noticing that most white Americans — Jewish, WASP or otherwise — can’t or don’t fully notice how people of color are trapped by racist structures of power. They can’t even identify how racism infuses all aspects of our lives, our choices and our expectations of themselves and others, despite good intentions.

You might think I’m not being entirely fair. Yes, most of us and our children are a part of white America now. But we know plenty of young Jewish Americans who are very proudly Jewish. Many are devoted to Israel, devoted to good causes; they fight racism and other injustices. But if we are going to take our American-ness and our Jewishness seriously, we must own all the ways that we have benefited from and continue to benefit from the worst elements of American racist culture.

I write about racism and Jewish identity not because we are not good people. I write about this because in recognizing race as central in American Jewish identity, we cannot only more effectively use our success in this country for good purposes, but we can return truly to the essence of what being Jewish in the world really means.

Our people have been known by many names over the centuries. Once, we were called Hebrews. In Hebrew, the word is “Ivri,” which translates as “the other” or “from somewhere else.” We were also called “B’nai Yisrael,” the Children of Israel. Yisra’el literally means “struggling with God.” We are to be the ones who struggle with ultimate issues of life, of values, of justice. Through the centuries, our moments of power have been all too fleeting. Mostly, our hope has been to be tolerated. From our place at the periphery, we have responded always with the ability to critique injustice, to adopt the cause of the oppressed, to envision a better and more just world. Even in times when we participated fully in non-Jewish societies, we always knew that we stood with one foot in the mainstream, and one foot outside.

America is unique in Jewish history because the social construct of power and oppression in this society came to be based more on skin color than on religion or ethnic identity. Because of that, along with the best of American values and our own hard work, we now find ourselves as another privileged white ethnicity. Despite our only good intentions, we are — all of us — full participants and beneficiaries of the American evil known as racism.

Jews will identify as white when it is to their advantage to do so. People respond to incentives. In America today, it helps to not identify as white. The core of America (whites) is under assault from the coalition of the fringe (blacks, Muslims, latinos, homos, trannies, Jews, etc). So Jews identify as an oppressed people of color.

In the South prior to the 1960s, Jews generally identified as white to fit in better.

If immigration to America was limited to whites, Jews who wanted to immigrate would argue that they were white.

The rabbi does not mention the negative attitude of the Jewish tradition toward blacks and how blacks in Israel have similar problems to blacks in America.

From the black website The Root:

A few days into an educational trip to Israel in 1991 shortly after the mass airlift of Ethiopian Jews into the country, my jaw dropped when a Jewish official casually described the arrival of the Ethiopians as an opportunity to beef up Israel’s Olympic running team.

More than two decades later, and it appears that probably didn’t work out. Israel now seems more anxious to give its sizable black African migrant population the boot. At the moment, the focus is much less on settled-in Ethiopian Jews and more so on Sudanese, Eritrean and Ethiopian Christians fleeing war, persecution and poverty at home. And, naturally, if you’re a poor African migrant looking for work, you’re headed to Israel, a top 40 country in terms of gross domestic product and the closest, most powerful, democratic, free market economy you can find within regional distance.

But now, turn back: because if you’re a black undocumented migrant, Israel is giving you 30 days to get gone. In a bid to put a humane face on it, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is putting money where its racially charged mouth is. An estimated 45,000 Eritrean and Sudanese refugees not only get a free, no-return ticket back home (or to some “unnamed” African nation) but  also get sent with $3,500 in their pocket.

…The situation in Israel also appears equally complicated and racially challenged. Plans to push African migrants out of the Holy Land had been stirring for some time as Israel built new fences and detention centers along its southern borders. Netanyahu’s government claims it’s all about keeping black migrants safe from deadly desert crossings. But the U.N. refugee agency pushed back on that, accusing Israel of “creat[ing] fear and chaos amongst asylum seekers” and dangerously teetering on the edge of an international refugee-treaty violation…

Recent #BlackLivesMatter-style protests organized by Ethiopians in Tel Aviv underscore an embarrassing undercurrent of discrimination in a society popularly viewed as Jewish but racially as majority white. And with that comes familiar white-people-prompted problems. Israeli Ethiopians face challenges similar to those of African Americans in the United States: from high unemployment to police brutality and rampant incarceration.

Some critics, like black British filmmaker Ishmahil Blagrove, charge that the Israeli prison system is 90 percent black. Others, like Forward’s Seth Frantzman, point out that Israeli Defense Forces military-prison populations are 40 percent Ethiopian, or “760 percent higher than their proportion in society.” Israel, always in a state of war, mandates compulsory military service from its citizens.

There’s been a troubled history of Israel’s policies toward African migrants, including the treatment of once wildly embraced Ethiopian Jews who arrived by Operation Solomon in the early ’90s fleeing anti-Jewish persecution. Worries mount for Israel as its Jewish majority sweats a fast-growing non-Jewish Arab population and the presence of nearly 100,000 non-Jewish African migrants challenging the stability of the country’s relatively tiny population of 9 million.

Posted in Blacks, Jews, Race, Whites | Comments Off on WP: Jews in America struggled for decades to become white. Now we must give up whiteness to fight racism.

MetroWeekly: Last fall, Rabbi Gil Steinlauf of Adas Israel Synagogue sent an email to his congregation. He told them he was gay. (And it was good.)

MetroWeekly: “I’m not going to go on record as saying Moses was gay.”

Rabbi Gil Steinlauf says this with a laugh — he laughs often and warmly, it turns out — but he’s also quite serious in response to a reporter’s offhand remark that Moses could be viewed as history’s first gay activist.

“But the story of Moses is a kind of coming out story,” Steinlauf says. “He grew up as a Prince of Egypt in the house of Pharaoh, completely in the center of power. Yet, he was nursed by his Israelite mother, so he knew that he had this secret identity. He lived in inner-conflict over those two worlds, those two identities of himself, until he finally came to a head when he killed an Egyptian who was oppressing an Israelite, and ran away. He tried to hide until God called him back. And then he spoke on behalf of his people.

“So I always make the argument that Moses has a kind of queer coming-out parallel in his life story, and that’s a fundamental motivational factor for his ability to recognize the suffering of his people and to stand up to Pharaoh, because of his ability to overcome his own limitations and insecurities and his shame of who he was.”

The same could be said for Rabbi Steinlauf who, in an act of courage last October, sent an email to his congregation of more than 1,500 families at Adas Israel, the storied Conservative synagogue that presides over the Cleveland Park neighborhood of Washington, D.C., and includes Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elana Kagan among its worshipers. In the email, Steinlauf informed his congregation that he, in fact, was gay and that he and his wife of 20 years, Batya, with whom he has three teenage children, would be divorcing.

Posted in Homosexuality | Comments Off on MetroWeekly: Last fall, Rabbi Gil Steinlauf of Adas Israel Synagogue sent an email to his congregation. He told them he was gay. (And it was good.)

Brazilian Ethics

This type of behavior is why Brazil is such a basketcase.

New York Times:

Winning ugly is different from winning illegally. The first you can get away with, while the second should not be allowed at all.

England’s Football Association did the logical thing to Chelsea’s Diego Costa after his sneaky aggression against Arsenal over the weekend: It charged him with violent conduct. Costa, a Brazilian-born center forward, could face a three-game suspension if he is found guilty, and it would not be the first, or probably last, punishment of a player who revels in his from-the-streets background and whose game reflects a win-at-all-costs attitude.

…“Everyone knows Diego,” Zouma said on beIN Sports TV. “And this guy likes to cheat a lot and put the opponents out of his game, and that happened in the game. He’s a real nice guy in the life, and we are very proud to have him.”

…Apparently unseen by the referee Mike Dean, Costa first went after Arsenal defender Laurent Koscielny, pushing hands into the nose and mouth of the French defender. Then Costa, with his back to Koscielny, raked his left hand across the Arsenal player’s forehead.

In close-ups, the aggression looks even worse, with Costa appearing to gouge Koscielny’s face. After the two players squared off and Costa bumped his chest into Koscielny’s, Arsenal’s other central defender, Gabriel, became involved.

Posted in Brazil | Comments Off on Brazilian Ethics

Australia’s New Prime Minister

Mark Steyn writes:

Tony Abbott is – was – more to my taste ideologically. He’s a monarchist, a social conservative, the man who repealed Australia’s disastrous carbon tax. But he was not an effective executive or parliamentarian or shifter of public opinion – and, partly as a result, he let me down badly on one of my two core issues: freedom of speech.

Malcolm Turnbull is far less to my taste ideologically. He’s a republican, in favor of gay marriage, who’s hot for all the climate-change hooey and supported that ghastly carbon tax. He’s also a little thin-skinned – to the point where he walked out of one of my speeches. Not over anything I said, alas. He never got that far. He took umbrage at something Nick Minchin, Australian Senate leader and Finance Minister, said during his introduction of me: Nick and Malcolm were on opposite sides during the monarchy referendum, and so Turnbull flounced out in what, for a republican, was a very queeny huff.

That said, I find him one of the most serious and thoughtful politicians on the other of my core issues: demography. We sat next to each other at a conference a few years back. It was alphabetical – so S for Steyn, T for Turnbull; on my other side, I had R for Kevin Rudd, the previously ousted Prime Minister. We had little plates of snacky-type stuff and, every time I turned to talk to Turnbull, Rudd’s hand crept over and snaffled my nibbles. Anyway, Turnbull, like me, is a serious demographic junkie, and he spent much of the afternoon passing me various napkin doodles of inverted pyramids showing projected population declines for different fertility rates. Compared to most politicians around the west, he was almost uniquely well-informed on the subject.

So I wish him well, and I assume he has learned the lesson of his last, failed stint as leader, which led to Tony Abbott deposing him. Now he has deposed Abbott, a decent bloke but one who seemed never quite to grasp that a leader has to lead. In the end, the issue was his competence rather than his conservatism.

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on Australia’s New Prime Minister

How Do We Resist Illegal Immigrants

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* 1. We start by saying that we will never return someone who has fled for their life from their home country to their home country. It would be inhumane.
2. We make an agreement with a country such as North Korea or the Democratic Republic of Congo, or Sudan to take the refugees. They will be paid $1000 for every year that the refugee remains in the country.
3. Every refugee who arrives will have their application automatically accepted and be immediately shipped to the country from step 2.
4. If any refugee has troubles leaving their country of refuge, we will file protests through official channels with the country from step 2 while holding firmly to our no bribery policy.

* What I hear is Australia is becoming Asian very fast via legal immigration. Asians from India, China, Burma, Thailand, Vietnam, every place in Asia but not as many from Muslim nations such as Afghanistan. Most have to pass skills tests? English proficiency? The best thing than can be said is that Australia is allowing in educated Asians while we are the dumping ground for Mexico, Central America and the 3rd world.

I read some Australian propaganda that they must allow in so many Asians to keep ahead technologically. A very high number of Chinese go to university there (similar to the American situation) and how many will return home?

* In Australia there is a large, influential and very noisy leftist minority who are adamantly opposed to the current successful policy that has entirely stopped “irregular maritime arrivals” (to use the official phrase).

The new Prime Minister (Turnbull) tends to share the views of that minority, at least on social issues, notwithstanding he is in (and now leads) a centre-right party (called the Liberal Party, just to confuse our American friends).

Turnbull would most likely restore the status quo ante if he had enough freedom to do so, but he would risk an immediate and violent backlash from his party – and from the majority of the electorate – if he tried it. My money is on his self-interest trumping his heartfelt wish to show all his friends at Eastern Suburbs (of Sydney) dinner parties what a goodwhite he is.

* We have roughly a century of stockpiled firepower, and defense comes down to being willing to use that. A wall or fence is no good if we won’t defend it, the law meaningless if we won’t enforce it. If instead our people are really determined to give their nation away, it really doesn’t matter what the plans are for that. I suppose education about the camp of the saints, and demographics and what they really mean would prove useful, but that is too racist to work.

* The system understands only one language – violence. The rioters of Ferguson were correct and their critics are victims. If you meekly allow yourselves to be robbed, well then you’re going to be robbed. This is the iron way of the world and always has been. Modern justice and democracy are shams that conceal that reality. Any white who doesn’t regard liberals in the same way that inmates in Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia regarded their camp guards is a cuck.

* There’s nothing “subtle” about Camp of the Saints flash mobs, so the prophylactic against them cannot be subtle, so it must be absolute: Zero Tolerance. What’s needed is a fifty years long total ban on all immigration.

Bear in mind that no disincentive can work until the sacred cow of Multiculturalism-Diversity as the All-Highest Good will have been exposed, slain, butchered, and incinerated to ashes.

* Americans need to stop being so damn welcoming and friendly to migrants. Some few will genuinely appreciate it and respond in kind. Most will regard it as what it is–a kindness that so readily shades off into weakness. Just altering one’s demeanor, smiling less often and less widely, making less effort to understand mangled English, making no effort to understand any other language–these all have a cooling effect on foreigners. Even the illiterate ones have gotten the memo–Americans are suckers. No need to be rude but any glad-handing should be avoided. NAMS are especially thin-skinned. They also tend to be bullies and you can almost always bully a bully. Formal and not friendly tends to cause them to back away, if not down completely. Migrants who don’t feel welcome are far less likely to tell their families back home to “Come on in, the water’s fine!”

I base these suggestions on my years spent interacting daily with foreigners from all over the world while living in a college town.

* 1. Elect Trump. In the meantime, make it clear to the world that you support Trump. He is hard line, everyone knows it, and he can move the Overton Window.

2. As others have suggested, set a concrete limit on the total number of immigrants that will be allowed into the US per year. Make it known that “migrants” and “refugees” will count as part of that number, thus reducing visas and opportunities for everyone else’s favorite race or interest group.

3. Also as others have suggested, establish one finite budget for assistance to both migrants and Americans. Make it clear to everyone that migrants will be taking from this budget, thus reducing benefits for every other moocher here.

I can imagine points 2 and 3 as parts of a Trump position statement on his website.

4. Set up a processing area somewhere like northern Alaska. It’s cold up there, and all these scumbags who want to invade European Man’s living space come from warm latitudes (big surprise). Let the world and social media know that we have this place ready, and that everyone will be stuck there for a long time while we inefficiently clear them.

5. Make sure they know that a lot of them will be permanently located up there somewhere, where we can say they will have the opportunity to work and make their homes — in northern Alaska, or North Dakota, or the most remote areas of Wyoming (cold and windy.)

6. (Most subtle and tricky of all) subversively facilitate a healthy dislike for the migrant group and it’s ethnicities. I somehow believe smarter people than me can find ways of making this happen. Make it agitprop or psyop or something. It is perfectly okay not to like people. Let’s start now. Get your Hollywood friends to make them villians in movies and TV shows. Produce Borat 2 and make him a terrorist.

7. Publicize images of the mass of “migrants” as they truly are: aggressive mobs of men. STOP PUTTING BABY PICTURES ON EVERY STORY.

* You’d have to act through civil disobedience–violent acts can be easily targeted by the FBI (and rightly so, violence is violence), but clerks refusing to endorse in-state tuition for illegals a la Kim Davis, massive protests and boycotts against employers using illegal labor, and any other ideas I am not clever enough to come up with. Even if they don’t want to enforce immigration violations, if you deluge DHS with (true!) reports of illegal activity someone else can ask why they have all these reports of illegal activity they’re ignoring, and run an expose. Don’t talk about what you would do if you had the levers of power you don’t have (PSAs, building walls, etc.–a wall would work but it will never be built). Work with the levers of power you do. It’s what the Tea Party does.

I saw Gamergate make the feminists blink. Many Americans from both parties are on our side. Let’s see what we can do.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on How Do We Resist Illegal Immigrants