January 7, 2016 The Long Silence—The Cologne Sex Attacks And The German Media. Luke Ford No sacred cows.

The Long Silence—The Cologne Sex Attacks And The German Media.

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

From VDARE: It took four days for the German Mainstream Media to report New Year’s Eve mass sex assaults on women by up to 1000 heavily intoxicated immigrants of “Arab or North African origin “, as the German police describe the still-unapprehended perpetrators—now. The internet and social media alone forced the MSM’s hand. And the German political class has plans for that.

What happened on a Cologne square near to Germany´s most famous Catholic cathedral recalled the sexual mob crimes on Tahrir Square in Cairo during the infamous “Arab Spring. “ While Germans welcomed the New Year with fire crackers, well-organized groups of immigrant men 18-35 surrounded and isolated their victims. So far more than 118 women have reported to the police that they were mugged by dozens of men who groped, insulted and robbed them. At least one woman was raped. [‘I Feel So Dirty. So Used’ — Harrowing Testimony Of Cologne Victims, Breitbart, January 6, 2016]

Significantly, similar attacks happened on New Year´s Eve in Hamburg, in Stuttgart and in other German towns. [Germany shocked by Cologne New Year gang assaults on women, BBC, January 5, 2016]

As in most cases of crimes committed by immigrants and “refugees” in Germany, the news was available only in the social media. At first, only two MSM outlets—the online editions of a local paper in Cologne and a magazine in Munich—reported the assaults.

One key reason for the delay: the reluctance of the local police themselves to report crimes linked to asylum seekers. “Exuberant atmosphere—celebration mostly peaceful” was the title of the Cologne police report published the morning after. [Archived copy: POL-K: 160101-1-K/LEV Ausgelassene Stimmung – Feiern weitgehend friedlich]

But in fact the police were very well informed about the events in the historic center of the city. Apart from anything else, a police woman had been assaulted too. Several police officers witnessed what was going on but were not able to intervene because they were surrounded and threatened by hundreds of aggressive and violent delinquents.

But only on Monday January 4—four days later—did Police Commissioner Wolfgang Albers denounced “criminal offenses of a completely new dimension” with a thousand suspects whose appearance indicate their “Arab or North African origin”.

Nevertheless, although the delinquents could not be identified arrested, the commissioner was sure that there were no asylum seekers among them!

On Tuesday January 5, the story finally entered the MSM—accompanied by the usual warnings not to blame Islam, mass immigration and Angela Merkel’s welcome policy towards “refugees,” which allegedly have nothing to do with the marauding gangs of Arab sex offenders.

It was a worst scenario for Leftists of all colors, Open Borders activists, feminists and Merkel´s cabinet because it affected women and immigrants, two of the most coddled client groups of the German welfare state.

But what happened in Cologne was simply too big to be ignored like the numerous individual cases of sexual violence committed inside and outside Germany’s refugee centers, the brawls between different ethnic and religious groups, and the continuous harassment of Christian refugees by Muslims.

Germany’s rulers prefer not to see what really happens in their country. In their eyes, the real danger are not militant Islamists and violent gangs of young men “with an immigrant background”, but Germans who Notice those crimes and are therefore regularly insulted as “racists” and “Nazis”.

A solid majority of the Germans does not trust politicians and the MSM. But multiculturalism and the ideology of perennial German guilt still dominate televised debates and op-eds in Left-leaning newspapers like the influential Süddeutsche Zeitung.

The tyranny of Political Correctness is supported by legal constraints, which do inhibit the police and the MSM’s ability to mention the ethnic origin or the religious affiliation of a perpetrator, particularly if he is part of a “vulnerable minority”. As a rule, the police do not report it at all.

(In December the Ministry of The Interior in the German state of Baden-Württemberg published for the first time figures on criminal offenses related to asylum applicants between January and November 2015. They represented one percent of the total population of Baden-Württemberg but were involved in five percent (27,255) of all registered crimes— among them 1000 cases of grievous bodily harm, 22 of attempted homicide and 700 of domestic burglary. Syrian asylum seekers were on top, with 5,576.)

The German “Press Council”, instituted in 1956 to head off government regulation by voluntary self-regulation, allows in its Code of Conduct the mention a criminal’s affiliation with an ethnic, religious or another minority only if the crime is directly related to that affiliation. [Guideline 12. 1 Reports On Crimes]You may report it, for instance, when Muslim gangs attack Christians because of their religion, or when Palestinians march together with German Communists and Nazis shouting “Hamas! Hamas! Jews to the gas!” as in Berlin last June. [Wave of anti-Semitic rallies hits cities across Germany, Times Of Israel, July 21, 2014] But you must not mention it in the case of sexual assaults, robbery, burglary or other crimes, because these crimes are not exclusively committed by these ethnic or religious groups.

In Cologne, there were simply too many women who described the sexual mob as of “Arab or North African origin” to be ignored. But one or even several individual cases would not have been enough to break the wall of silence.

Not less alarming are the attempts to shut down dissent voices against Merkel´s reckless policy of Open Borders. Take the case of Akif Pirincci, a German writer of Turkish origin, who warns constantly against the danger of Islamization and the transformation of Germany into a “Muslim dumping ground”. His books, among them Germany Gone Mad, [Deutschland von Sinnen ] were bestsellers—until this fall, the big publishers and bookshops decided not to distribute them anymore. It was the first time since the Nazi era that such a boycott had occurred. But instead of protesting, most German public intellectuals defended censorship.

Similarly, the Catholic journalist Matthias Matussek was fired by the newspaper Die Welt because he after the November massacres in Paris he posted on his personal Facebook page: “I think that the Terror in Paris will move also our debate about open borders and a quarter million of non-registered young Muslim men in our country in an entirely new and fresh direction”.

That debate has not happened, but Matussek lost his job.

Although German government, Establishment political parties and the MSM do their best to protect multiculturalism against a dissenting public, the country still does not meet the Political Correctness requirements of supranational European institutions. Thus the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), arguably the most dispensable body of the Council of Europe, has lambasted Germany because “the notion of racism is often interpreted too narrowly”—it does not cover “certain statements about Muslims focusing on security issues or a supposed `integration deficit’.”[ECRI Report On Germany, February 25, 2014 PDF]

These European guardians of PC criticized the fact that German newspapers carried excerpts from Thilo Sarrazin’s best-selling book Germany Abolishes Itself, which allegedly contains arguments “close to the theories of eugenics espoused by the National Socialists”.

Here are some of the citations the ECRI regards as typically Nazi:

“Immigrants from former Yugoslavia, Turkey and the Arab countries are at the heart of the integration problem.”
“Many Arabs and Turks in this city have no productive function, except for the fruit and vegetable trade.”
“If the least intelligent people have a higher fertility rate, the average intelligence of the population decreases.”
“I do not want the country of my grandchildren and great grandchildren to be mainly Muslim, that Turkish and Arabic are largely spoken, that women wear headscarves and the daily routine is determined by the call of the muezzins.”

What can we expect from 2016? Recently, the European Commission estimated that 3 million “refugees” could arrive in the EU in the course of the year—three times more than in 2015. Ms. Merkel still refuses to fix an upper limit to the influx of asylum seekers. If anything, the debate in Germany about a tightening of the asylum law only increase the influx—they want to get in as soon as possible because they fear that the gate could close.

My prediction: the dictatorship of Political Correctness will be further strengthened in Germany. Dissidents will be persecuted. Violence will occur between different groups of asylum seekers and between asylum seekers and the native German population. Social assistance will be redistributed from the European working poor to Arab immigrants. Islamization will continue.

And not just Germany, but also Europe, abolishes itself.

Posted in Europe, Germany, Immigration | Comments Off

WaPo: “Germany Springs to Action Over Hate Speech Against Migrants”

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes:

Germany does have a problem with violence by thugs who are anti-immigrant: cases of arson, and the poor mayoress of Cologne got stabbed by a rightwinger last fall. The co-founder of the PEGIDA protests is a nightclub promoter with a long criminal record from his younger days.
But I wonder if the sleaziness of some of the public opponents of immigration in Germany is an effect more than a cause of the legal and social restraints on freedom of speech on this crucial topic?

COMMENTS:

* Yes, please keep suppressing legal dissent to the current lawless Merkel regime. That will bring no problems whatsoever. It’s not like Germans have a ready made role model for how to deal with criminal minorities. When have the Germans ever been good at organized violence?

* Discourse which is socially unacceptable gets pushed to the fringes, and only those who have nothing to lose (ie have independent income or have no status to begin with) can engage in it openly.

* Most prominent subreddits deleted posts about the attacks and banned their posters even if they were articles from liberal sources like the NYT and the BBC. This is censorship on Reddit, an american website.
Ostensibly the censorship is done by moderators, who are also users, but it is well known that moderators of big subs are being coordinated by employees on speech policies, especially since several openly racist subs were banned and the new CEO (who replaced Ellen Pao) made it clear that some content is off limits.
Facebook, Google, and Twitter are allowing ISIS propaganda, but they censor this.

* You can’t have a democratic society where the citizens are told they aren’t allowed to know certain facts or say certain things, because the right to know those facts and speak them freely is critical to making informed decisions. Ergo, German officials have conspired to make Germany an undemocratic society, and treat Germans as far less than citizens.

That is the truth which logically follows from the behavior of the German government and press.

* There was an assassination attempt on Nigel Farage but Merkel is still safe? There seems to be a disconnect between the scaremongering about the Nationalists, who don’t do much, and the Globalists who are portrayed as peaceful and yet they’re the instigators of turmoil and assassination attempts on those who reject the Globalist destruction of societies.

Frankly, I’m surprised that no present-day Claus von Stauffenberg taken action. As was noted upthread, those with too much to lose simply submit to oppression and those with nothing to lose are free to speak and act, but those with nothing to lose have little ability to change the course of events.

* – It is the AntiFa “refugees welcome” crowd that are more violent than the so-called far-Right. It will not surprise me, in the wake of the sexual assaults in Germany, if they torch some refugee centers themselves and blame it on the Right.
– There is a hilarious video on YouTube where some AntiFa members giddily try to join a gathering of Muslims in Rosengard, Sweden, expecting to be warmly received as friends; and are beaten and driven off.

* There’s still too much to lose and nothing to gain. Middle class people with jobs are not going to duke it out with riot police nor engage in street fights with Arabs and North Africans at this point. But there are only two eventual outcomes: surrender or brutal violence. Western immigration policy is completely irresponsible, i.e., treasonous.

* I hesitate to say this since I am only 11 years old and don’t know what all the legal ramifications are, “But, Frau Merkel isn’t wearing anything at all.” There, I’ve said it. I wonder if unz.com will block my “hate speech.”

* Steve, you refreshingly clarified issues that the average German does not even dream of.

I had not thought of the issue that the German media forces social media to repress non-violent free speech against refugees, but is unconcerned about twitter and facebook use to foment riots and terror.

German Main Stream Media censorship is even more efficient than in the US. The German Pressecodex 12.1 is similar to the US Associated Press Stylebook [2], demanding that race, religion, national origin of minority criminals be hidden.

Due to Nazi past knee jerk fears, and lack of first amendment rights, German censorship is a lot more efficient. Germans are totally deprived of knowledge that can be found on alternative English language sites.

Bold language, like Ann Coulter’s could lead to fines and prison terms in Germany.

* They condemn ‘racism’ along with ‘sexism’.

But isn’t it ‘racist’ to deny interracial passion? Besides, if Germans say it’s okay for aliens to violate and trespass into German territory, why are they complaining about aliens violating the bodies of German women? If it is ‘racist’ to deny forced entry into your land by foreign men, it must also be ‘racist’ to deny them forced entry into your body. Not only your land but your body must be ‘welcoming’ and ‘inclusive’ and never discriminate.

Nationalism is said to be ‘racist’ for denying trespass into your land by foreigners. Then, it follows that women’s rights are also ‘racist’ for giving women the choice of who gets in and who stays out.
Shouldn’t they be welcoming to any man who seeks refuge from sexual frustration?

Help the sexual refugees. Poor lads, all of them.

* The other day, Steve posted a item about forecasting and the lack of efficacy thereof, as it is commonly practiced.
Well on that note, two lions of the mid 20th century, who more or less got the present state of affairs bang to rights – in contrast to a whole host of other rather overrated and over lauded pundits, happen to be two Englishmen, of that peculiar school of middle-class English ‘practical men’ who eschew over-intellectualizing snobbery, and when would never but never use that pompous French affectation of ‘public intellectual’ and all the affectations which go with it, but rather have the perscipacity for seeing the world as it is, and the honesty of calling it out as it is.

I am speaking, of course, of George Orwell and Enoch Powell.

* Laws against “hate speech” are already here in the United States camouflaged as anti-bullying laws:

New Jersey high schooler accused of violating New Jersey anti-bullying laws for making anti-Israel tweets.

“A social media storm erupted after administrators at a New Jersey high school accused a student of bullying because of anti-Israel comments that she posted on Twitter. They say that the tweets may have violated the state’s broad anti-bullying laws. Bethany Koval, a 16-year-old Israeli Jew, said on Wednesday that she was called to the principal’s office at Fair Lawn High School and reprimanded for making tweets criticizing Israel and mentioning that a pro-Israel classmate had unfollowed her on Twitter.”

Posted in Censorship, Germany, Immigration | Comments Off

An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

From Wikipedia:

An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus (大和民族を中核とする世界政策の検討, Yamato Minzoku o Chūkaku to suru Sekai Seisaku no Kentō?), was a secret Japanese government report created by the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s Population Problems Research Center, and completed on July 1, 1943.

The document, comprising six volumes totaling 3,127 pages, deals with race theory in general, and the rationale behind policies adopted by wartime Japan towards other races, while also providing a vision of Asia under Japanese control.[1]

The document was written in an academic style, surveying Western philosophy on race from the writings of Plato and Aristotle to modern German social scientists, such as Karl Haushofer. A connection between racism, nationalism and imperialism was also claimed, with the conclusion, drawing by citing both British and German sources, that overseas expansionism was essential not only for military and economic security, but for preserving racial consciousness. Concerns pertaining to the cultural assimilation of second and third generation immigrants into foreign cultures were also mentioned.

Some statements in the document coincide with the then publicly espoused concept of Yamato People; however, much of the work borrowed heavily from German National Socialist racial, political and economic theories, including mention of the “Jewish” problem and inclusion of racist anti-Jewish political cartoons, although Japan had a rather negligible and largely overlooked Jewish minority. The term “blood and soil” was frequently used, though usually in quotes, as if to indicate its alien origin.[5]

The authors rationalized of Japanese colonization of most of the eastern hemisphere including New Zealand and Australia, with projected populations by the 1950s, as “securing the living space of the Yamato race”, a very clear echo of the Nazi concept of Lebensraum.

However, where the document deviated from Nazi ideology was in its use of Confucianism and the metaphor of the patriarchical family. This metaphor, with the non-Japanese Asians serving as children of the Japanese,[4] rationalized the “equitable inequality” of Japanese political, economic, and cultural dominance.[7] Just as a family has harmony and reciprocity, but with a clear-cut hierarchy, the Japanese, as a purportedly racially superior people, were destined to rule Asia “eternally” as the head of the family of Asian nations.[8] The term “proper place” was used frequently throughout the document.[5]

The document left open whether Japan was destined eventually to become head of the global family of nations.

The document drew an explicit distinction between jinshu (人種)[9] or Rasse (English: race), and minzoku (民族?) or Volk (English: people), describing a minzoku as “a natural and spiritual community bound by a common destiny.”[10] However, the authors went on to assert that blood mattered.[11] It approved of Hitler’s concern about finding the “Germanness” of his people.[12] It made explicit calls, sometimes approaching Nazi attitudes, for eugenic improvements, calling for the medical profession not to concentrate on the sick and weak, and for mental and physical training and selective marriages to improve the population

Posted in Japan | Comments Off

Pinker on the Hunt for IQ Genes

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Steve Pinker has done a great job of slowly and cautiously getting HBD thinking into the mainstream. He needs to watch his every step or he will be Watsoned by the censorship mob. So far he has shown a very deft touch in gently and subtly pushing the science. We need more major public figures like him in academia and the media.

* James Thompson has an excellent write up on a study that just came out.

It is a mind blowing scientific breakthrough. The actual paper is behind a paywall and the abstract is well named, so to understand the findings go to James Thompson’s blog.

There is a huge variation in genetic in human intelligence and HBDers as well as psychometric studies have been saying it for years. Now, finally now the scientific proof is coming out. Just read what James Thompson has to say, he quotes at length from the article which is going to open up the doors to a brave new world, where folks like Steve Sailer will have scientific proof to back up his HBD claims.

We live in interesting times. No doubt Razib Khan and Greg Cochran will have their take on what this all means coming out shortly. Honestly Pinker brilliant as he is, influential as he is, he isn’t on the hunt for IQ genes, he isn’t a geneticist. In a nutshell there are no individual genes with large impact on IQ. What this study has found is that there is a large group of genes that together create an optimum combination that cause a better functioning human brain.

* Since when is the test of a theory whether it is too depressing or not? You could consider it depressing to think that the sun will one day run out of fuel and all life on earth will perish but that’s no reason not to accept the scientific evidence that is so. It is fatalistic to think that the human lifespan appears to be limited to perhaps 120 years or so, but you can’t deny it. But somehow, in this area it’s OK to cover your ears and shout “nah, nah, nah, I can’t hear you” because it might cause you to draw uncomfortable conclusions.

By the way, the conclusions you draw from this have nothing to do with the findings themselves. Just because intelligence is partly heritable it doesn’t follow that we must therefore build extermination camps or sterilize the less intelligent. Human dignity does not have an IQ cutoff.

In some ways, acceptance of this would be liberating. Say you are a black person with an 85 IQ, just like your parents and siblings. You are constantly being told that you are actually a genius just like the great African geniuses who built the pyramids and yet you find academic work to be incredibly difficult. You are told that white people have cheated you by not teaching you in a culturally appropriate way, which fills you with anger (but nothing anyone tries seems to work). You keep trying and keep running up against intellectual brick walls – calculus, even algebra just don’t seem to register – it’s as if the teacher is speaking some foreign language that you don’t understand and you can never seem to break the code no matter how hard you study. Wouldn’t it be better to just accept that you just don’t have it in you because you were born that way?

I was always horribly uncoordinated – the last person to be picked for teams in gym class (and no one in my family has ever shown any glimmer of athletic talent). Nor am I particularly musical or artistic (again like the rest of my family) I grew to accept this situation. Although I wish that I had been gifted with more talent in these areas, I had to accept reality and play to my strengths instead.

* People who are terrible in math generally aren’t interested in math. Most adults of all ethnic groups don’t have basic calculus or even basic algebra proficiency. And they generally don’t care. If you meet people who are really interested in math, and do math for fun, they may not be math superstars or as good as they wish, but they generally have basic math aptitude. I’ve never heard of an adult who always wishes they could learn calculus but simply lacked the aptitude. Math skill is heritable, but I suspect that it is the personality that is interested in math that is inherited through genes, and the aptitude is developed in response.

* The book Architects of Annihilation is enlightening about the extent to which the Nazi program was mainstream technocratic thinking in racial guise. For example guidance about which East European ought to be selected for Germanisation specified they were to be from high achieving families irrespective of their sub racial type.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off

‘If Trump wins, the US will turn into Mexico. If he loses, it will turn into Honduras.’

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes:

Births to Mexican women in the US are down 24% since the peak in 2007, but grew slightly from 2013 to 2014 suggesting the fall is over. Immigration is closely tied to baby-making, at least for Mexicans. Newly arrived Mexican women tend to rapidly pop out a sizable number of children, only to realize later that raising children in America is more expensive than they assumed.

The high Mexican birthrate during the Housing Bubble was of course related to the high immigration rate during Housing Bubble. The popping of the Housing Bubble hit Mexicans very hard, both in terms of defaulting on dubious loans and losing construction and mortgage vending jobs. But the big decline seems to be over.

The 2010s so far have been the decade of Asian immigrants, but now Central Americans are turning up. And the spike in Cuban births in 2014 is pretty interesting.

Posted in America | Comments Off

The Father Of The EU

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

From Wikipedia:

Richard Nikolaus Eijiro, Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi[1] (November 16, 1894 – July 27, 1972) was an Austrian-Japanese politician, philosopher and count of Coudenhove-Kalergi. A pioneer of European integration, he served as the founding president of the Paneuropean Union for 49 years. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo.[2] His childhood name in Japan was Aoyama Eijiro. He became a Czechoslovak citizen in 1919 and then took French nationality from 1939 until his death.

His first book, titled Pan-Europa was published in 1923, and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement.

In his attitudes towards race and religion, Coudenhove-Kalergi continued the work of his father. In his youth, the elder Coudenhove-Kalergi was an antisemite. He had expected to confirm his antipathy towards the Jews when he started working on his treatise Das Wesen des Antisemitismus (The Essence of Antisemitism); but, Coudenhove-Kalergi came to a different conclusion by the time he published his book in 1901. Following an ironic critique of the new racial theories, he declared that the essence of antisemitism amounted to nothing more credible than fanatical religious hatred. He traced that fanaticism to religious bigotry that originated in the promulgation of Torah under Ezra. According to the elder Coudenhove-Kalergi, Jewish religious bigotry provoked opposition from the relatively tolerant Greco-Roman polytheists, eliciting their anti-Judaic reaction. Heinrich Coudenhove-Kalergi credited the Jews with originating religious intolerance, and condemned it as a violation of genuine religious principles. He branded every sort of anti-Judaism unchristian. He further urged liberal Christians and Jews to ally in protecting both of their religions, and religion as such, against the emerging menace of secularism.[39]

In spite of his opposition to simplistic racial theory, Heinrich Coudenhove-Kalergi agreed that Jews are racially distinct. Although he pointed out that there is no Semitic race, because Semitic is a language family, he equivocated by also remarking that the charges that Semites were uncreative were belied by civilizations formed by the Assyrians and Babylonians, who spoke Semitic languages. He further sought to defend the Jews against bigoted charges of parasitic greed and cowardice with anecdotal counterexamples of Jewish industriousness and martial courage.[40]

In an interview in the first Pan-European Congress in 1926, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi expressed the supports on Jews by the Pan-European movement and the benefits to Jews with the elimination of racial hatred and economic rivalry brought by the United States of Europe.[41]

In 1932 Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi composed a preface for a new edition of his father’s condemnation of antisemitism, reissued by his own publishing house. In 1933 he responded to the ascendance of National Socialism by collaborating with Heinrich Mann, Arthur Holitscher, Lion Feuchtwanger, and Max Brod in writing and publishing the pamphlet Gegen die Phrase vom jüdischen Schädling (Against the Phrase ‘Jewish Parasite’).

In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), he wrote:[42]

“ The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. ”
“ Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Europe, Jews | Comments Off

#RapeRefugees

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* What German police need to do is set up a Morals Police division like Saudi Arabia to stop woman from walking around unescorted and to make sure they wear appropriate Burka’s so they don’t lure poor innocent immigrant men by showing off their ankles and faces.

* Lawrence Auster’s First Law:

“The worse any designated minority or alien group behaves in a liberal society, the bigger become the lies of Political Correctess in covering up for that group. Thus, instead of the revelation over the last 14 months of Islam’s dangerous and savage character leading (as would happen in a rational world) to a major discrediting of Muslims, or at least to a more sceptical attitude toward them, it has led to their being more favored, more coddled and more protected from criticism than ever before. They now get a whole new level of solicitous, sycophantic treatment, ranging from PBS “histories” of Islam that are more full of uncritical celebration of their subject than a tourist travelogue, to the media’s constant attacks on the rest of us for indulging in an anti-Muslim backlash which has somehow never occurred.

“That last point leads us to the first corrolary of Auster’s First Law of Majority/Minority Relations in Liberal Society: The more egregiously any non-Western or non-white group behaves, the more evil whites are made to appear for noticing and drawing rational conclusions about that group’s bad behavior.”

* Yes, we on the American Right are trying to warn and help our brothers and sisters in Europe, because Americans are still some of the best and least cynical people you will find on the planet. However, if I were to give in to darker, ambivalent feelings of schadenfreude, I would say it serves them right for how snotty and superior they have behaved toward American culture wars for decades. They have snorted at our guns for defense, the high crime and soaring prison demographics. Now they will see. It’s the beauty of diversity. Thank God and the American system we still have our guns.

* Whatever happens, we don’t want to start down that slippery slope of “blaming the perpetrator”.

Because Hitler.

Incidentally, according to Wikipedia, the phrase “blaming the victim” was coined by William Ryan in a book that was specifically written to challenge the Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action” (the Moynihan Report). Ryan accused Moynihan of “blaming the victim” in ascribing black social pathology to the breakdown in family structure.

So the feminists don’t really own that whole idea anyway, and they should just shut up about it and get used to be being groped by feral third-worlders, I suppose.

* The media have lied about the extent of anti-white racial violence for decades – helped by the fact that until now most of it was in the poorest areas – with the police covering it up also to avoid getting attacked by the media.

Merkel’s blitzrape of Germany has brought it out into the open.

* I have read that the Cologne police have no suspects in the New Year’s Eve incidents. I suspect that this means that they intend to perform no genuine investigation. Maybe the work of Bismarck needs to be undone and Germany should redivide into its previous constituent parts–at least a few of these might find the will for self-preservation.

* Young German women have for so long been world champions at adventurous travel.

At least now they can enjoy the benefits of travel… without burning so much kerosene which tragically contributes to the greenhouse effect. They can now be culturally enriched by exotic vibrant dark morgenländische Gestalten in their very own home towns.

* Where’s FEMEN in all of this? What we need now is a FEMEN protest with bare breasts. They do this at the drop of a hat in front of a Catholic Church or inside an Orthodox Cathedral. Now we really have a misogynistic group of men attacking gals. Isn’t this what FEMEN was supposed to protest?

* In November 2014, five male African-American students were arrested for sexually assaulting a female student (race unknown to the public) at William Paterson University in Paterson, New Jersey. A newspaper article from that time summarized the incident as follows:

The men … blocked the residence hall doorway, restrained the victim, and demanded that she have sex with all five of them …..
Before the attack began, [one of the men] Collick allegedly said that if the victim “wanted to have sex with him she would have to have sex with all of them,” …. He then made the statement, “Well, let’s have sex,” ….
The lights and television at the dorm room … were shut off and someone blocked the door ….
At some point during the assault, [another of the men] Latimer an 18-year-old student … walked into the room asking what was going on, according to one complaint. When another defendant replied that they were having sex with the victim, Latimer said, “Oh word, can I jump on that?” according to the complaint. Latimer then allegedly forced the victim to perform oral sex before penetrating her ….
… university president Kathleen Waldron said she was “angry and dismayed that this crime was committed on our campus and allegedly by students,” adding that she had “deep concern” for the “courageous victim.”

Waldron summarily expelled all five male students from the university.

However, in January 2015 a grand jury decided not to indict any of the five students. A newspaper article about that decision remarked that the five accused students were supported by many other students who knew them.

The five men had support on campus … with several students saying they never doubted they were innocent. Several of the students said they were friendly with the defendants but had no personal knowledge of the incident. One student said the lack of an indictment was “the most ethical outcome” possible. About 50 students had shown up during a hearing in Superior Court to support the defendants.
“I knew they would come out innocent; the truth always comes out,” said Julie Capiris, 18, a freshman … who was among those at the courthouse.
“Saw it coming,” said Andy Johnson, a first-year student who knew the five men from the Educational Opportunity Fund, a state program that helps lower-income students with tuition and support services. “Justice was definitely served.”

Now four of the five students have sued the university and its campus police force. Here are key details:

In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in state Superior Court in Paterson, an attorney for Collick and Williams said the accuser initiated consensual sex with the five defendants …. All of them were on good terms afterward, but the accuser went to the campus police later that day and reported the incident as a sexual assault, said Michael Epstein, the attorney.
“Without conducting any investigation and based on the accuser’s report alone,” campus police arrested the men within the next few days and charged them with numerous offenses, including aggravated sexual assault, kidnapping, conspiracy to commit sexual assault and criminal restraint.
Campus police did not interview any other witnesses, did not obtain cellphone records or surveillance video, and did not conduct a sexual assault examination — known as a rape kit — on the accuser, Epstein said.
“The officers who did the reported investigation were untrained, did not know how to conduct a sexual assault investigation,” Epstein said Tuesday.
Had they conducted a proper investigation, they would have found out that the accuser had called Collick 33 times that day with hopes of luring him into intercourse, Epstein said in the lawsuit.
“Interviews with other students would have revealed that the accuser was very sexually active at William Paterson, had many sexual partners, engaged in sexual activities with more than one partner on multiple occasions, had to change dormitory rooms because her roommate was uncomfortable with the level of the accuser’s sexual activity,” Epstein said in the lawsuit. Epstein also said the accuser had previous relations with Collick and Williams.

http://www.nj.com/passaic-county/index.ssf/2014/12/william_paterson_students_gang-raped_student_criminal_complaint_claims.html

http://www.northjersey.com/news/all-charges-dismissed-against-5-william-paterson-students-in-sex-assault-case-1.1261204

http://www.northjersey.com/news/former-wpu-students-file-suit-over-arrests-in-alleged-rape-1.1478296

Posted in Germany, Immigration, Rape | Comments Off

Rape Culture Around The World

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

Anatoly Karlin writes: In short, there are reasons why women in the Middle East, South Asia, and apparently (if to a smaller extent) in Central America are segregated and kept out of the workforce. The rare stupid foreign woman who insists on making an exception is quickly schooled in local mores (just Google search “Tahrir” and “female journalist”).

That is because these societies – the ones European elites are importing en masse – have evolved their own set of solutions to the issues they have with violence against women.

Laugh at her as you will, but in a way the feminist/Green mayor of Cologne, Henriette Reker, is far more reasonable in her advice to women in an Islamizing country that they would do well to self-segregate themselves – keep men at an arm’s distance, stay in groups, avoid public gatherings – than her critics, the blank slate true believers, who imagine that a Pakistani youth plucked out of his village will automatically start behaving like a European when transposed to a German metropolis.

COMMENTS:

* In this new, improved Germany her actions and advices are much more sound than I expected.

Thats terrible, but this is the world Germans are making for themselves. And I was making fun from the poor, insane feminist trying her best in the new insane Germany. Sorry Henriette, you really are a light unto your nation. Keep up the good work!

* M’thinks these New Year’s eve sexual assaults, wilding attacks in Germany will be a lot like the Central Park wilding attacks, gang rape and near murder of the White female jogger. The backlash brought about the defeat of Lib Black Dem mayor David Dinkins and the election of Mayor Rudy Guliani and the restoration of civilization in New York City.

The current mayor of Cologne Germany is a straight out of Central Casting idiot Liberal woman who blamed the women victims not the Arab/Muslim migrant sexual assaulters. This woman is going to be toast, here’s hoping Merkel loses more than just her job as Chancellor.

* People are not entirely dumb; whether the migrant from a culture prone to violence against women checks himself or lets himself go depends to some extent on their estimate of how likely they are to be punished and how desirable it is to rapidly integrate into the local milieu. For example, I would wager (without any data obviously) that if Syrian refugees arrive in small numbers in a very well-policed East Asian country and are explicitly told (by earlier migrants, first and foremost; and by everyone else they meet) that the local Nipponese police (I am NOT referring to actually-existing Japan, whose police are actually thought of as something of a soft touch) treats criminals VERY harshly and tends to “find their man”, and is never told that he has a right to rape Nipponese women because Nippon is responsible for all his woes…well, that man is very likely to behave rather better than the average ethnic-Nipponese-trash living in the neighborhood. In ALL the “better behaved” countries, the local underclass regularly beats women under their control, and especially so when drunk.
But this newfound code of good behavior does not apply to the bride he may import later from back home. SHE may get it bad. I would wager (again, without data, but with multiple anecdotes known to me) that girls from back home brought to marry working class migrants in Nipponia will be mistreated at rates that may be even higher than girls back home (though may or may not be higher than those of the local underclass).. Actual physical beating may be deterred by fear of the Nipponese police, but barely so. Girls will know their place, or will face a lot of disciplining. Since they too are not dumb, and the messaging is clear and is reinforced by the in-laws of all description, most will not need to be actually beaten.

Posted in Blacks, Crime, Islam, Rape | Comments Off

Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

From the Chateau:

Courtesy of reader chris, a large (and growing) reference list of studies finding strong and accumulating evidence for the Chateau Heartiste maxim that Diversity™ + Proximity = War by Various Means.

Feel free to link to this post on social media platforms or drop it in a clown world combox whenever a shitlib smugly wanders into your shitlord kill zone, begging for a hail of hot Realtalk™. Pounding an equalist dingbat over the head with real world events happening right before his eyes that contradict his religious teachings doesn’t work as well as pounding him over the head with peer reviewed SCIENCE!, for nothing flatters the shitlib ego as much as his carefully manicured belief that he is on the side of science. And nothing pleases yer ‘umble Destroyer of Ids more than witnessing the exact moment when a shitlib’s ego is rent in two.

***

– Social trust is negatively affected by ethnic diversity, case study in Denmark from 1979 to the present. Link.

– Ethnic homogeneity and Protestant traditions positively impact individual and societal levels of social trust. Link.

– “In longitudinal perspective, [across European regions], an increase in immigration is related to a decrease in social trust.” Link.

– Immigration undermines the moral imperative of those who most favor welfare benefits for the neediest. Link.

– The negative effect of community diversity on social cohesion is likely causal. Link.

– In Switzerland, social peace between diverse factions isn’t maintained by integrated coexistence, but rather by strong topographic and political borders that separate groups and allow them autonomy. Link.

– “Our analysis supports the hypothesis that violence between groups can be inhibited by both physical and political boundaries.” Link.

– Diversity hinders between-group cooperation at both the one-on-one and group levels. Link.

– The best chance for peace in Syria is better borders (intrastate or through the creation of new states) “suited to current geocultural regions”, and tribal autonomy. Link.

– Using data from US states, study finds a negative relationship between ethnic polarization and trust. Link.

– Diversity is associated with more White support for nationalist parties, except at the local level where large immigrant populations cut into vote totals for nationalist parties. Link.

– In Australia, ethnic diversity lowers social cohesion and increases “hunkering”, providing support for Putnam’s thesis finding the same results in the US. Link.

– After controlling for a self-selection bias, study finds that ethnic diversity in English schools reduces trust in same-age people and does not make White British students more inclusive in their attitudes towards immigrants. Link.

– In Germany, residential diversity reduces natives’ trust in neighbors, while it also reduces immigrants’ trust but through a different pathway. Link.

– Increasing social pluralism (diversity) is correlated with increased chance of collective violence. Link.

– “[E]thnic heterogeneity [diversity] explains 55% of the variation in the scale of ethnic conflicts, and the results of regression analysis disclose that the same relationship more or less applies to all 187 countries. … [E]thnic nepotism is the common cross-cultural background factor which supports the persistence of ethnic conflicts in the world as long as there are ethnically divided societies.” Link.

– Genetic Similarity Theory (GST) could help explain why diverse groups in close proximity increases ethnic conflict and ethnic nepotism. Link.

– Genetic diversity has contributed significantly to frequency of ethnic civil conflict, intensity of social unrest, growth of unshared policy preferences, and economic inequality over the last half-century. Link.

***

Chris summarizes,

In short: diversity gives us violence, conflict, less welfare, less trust, less cohesion. Merkel knew what she was doing. So do other elites. They are responsible. All the negatives of immigration and refugees are predictable and backed up by scientific evidence. Ergo each act of violence can be considered to be done from the hands of the elites themselves.
Merkel raped those women.

The ruling Western elite have native White blood and the rapes of native White women on their hands. Historically, what was done to ruling elites who displayed such open, traitorous contempt for their people? I’ll leave the imaginative answer to this question as an exercise for the readers.

Related to the above thought exercise: president Butt Naked is on record declaring he wants to turn America into a “hodgepodge of folks”, i.e., he hates White people and wants to see them demographically swamped by nonWhites.

COMMENTS:

* Well they’re defending the rapefugees, so its now undeniable: Open borders, and by extrapolation all of progressivism, is just anti-white, and specifically anti-white. Feminism, human rights, inequality, absolutely none of that ever mattered.

So it begs the question: When liberals see things like mass rape mobs in Cologne, do they feel a twinge of happiness and pride, similar to how I will feel when the Trump wall gets erected?

Its one thing to assume they’re living in a bubble or being tricked by the MSM, but that may give them too much credit: a good number of these liberal traitors look on muslim raping white women with glee and accomplishment. And these people are in power. Disgusting.

* Merkel, the cat-woman mayor of Cologne, and the German elites have a choice: defending the German women or defend the “refugees.” They’ve chosen the latter (women should keep men at “arm’s length,” these “refugees” need to be “taught” that outgoing women aren’t inviting sexual advances in German culture, government (!!) crack down on “hate speech” toward Muslims, etc.).

* Arabs and Africans, not “Muslims”. Arabs and Africans commit more crimes in the West whether they are Christian or Muslim. So do Latinos – you wouldn’t refer to them as “Catholic gangs”, would you? Religion has nothing to do with it. I see the Arabs here in my town all the time. Arab gang members drink alcohol and listen to rap music, and the women don’t wear veils. They are all steeped in Black “gangsta” culture.

Persians who move to the West don’t commit crimes like the Arabs and Africans, and Iranian asylum seekers in earlier decades (leftists mostly) are the only asylum-seeking group in Europe that go to college in the same proportion as native Westerners. Immigrated Indonesian Muslims, coming from the world’s largest Muslim nation, don’t commit crimes like the Arabs and Africans either. But U.S. Blacks, from Christian families, certainly do.

But most in European nationalist parties don’t want to note the racial differences that because that would be “racist”, so they’ll talk about religion instead. As if all the immigrants in Europe would be Muslim. They can never say anything negative about Black culture because Blacks in the U.S. aren’t immigrants. If you can’t use the word “immigrants” for them you’ll be forced to say Black, which means race, and that makes you a racist. That’s forbidden. Doesn’t look good if the media find out. So U.S. Blacks and their gangsta culture are ignored, and the fact Arabs in the West imitate them is also ignored.

As for Americans, you don’t see Arabs very often. You only see some terrorist acts on TV, so that’s all you know, and it’s comfortable for many to talk about terrorism instead of everyday crime – comfortable for those who are afraid to talk about race and prefer religion. The (Sunni) terrorism is caused by U.S. actions in the Middle East, killing millions over the years as Washington attacks the Israeli Lobby’s targets – the few M.E. governments that support the Palestinians. Without this, there would be no retaliation against the Western voters who put the politicians in power.

But that is too complicated for the rubes. Much better to talk about religion instead, that is comfortable for them. “Us vs. Them! The Muslims hate us for our freedom! It’s a culture war!” Never mind that the Zionist neocons the morons follow are allied with almost every Muslim government, and always have been, on condition that they ignore the taking of the last 22 percent of Palestinian land.

* Merkel is a childless hag who can’t stand anyone around her being happy or successful. She’s fat, old, and ugly, resembling a decrepit St. Bernard dog with a Jeff Daniels from “Dumb and Dumber” haircut, and this only compounds her envy. She enjoyed seeing those young, pretty girls be assaulted. She’s always been a sullen, degenerate, spiteful piece of shit– she literally marched in support of the East German Communist Party growing up. She knows she sucks and her whole life is a failure and a lie, so all she can do to protect her hamster is peevishly burn down her own country.

* As CH says the elites knew that this was going to happen. They had to. We all know their evil intent albeit shrouded in universalistic moral principles. So why did they not continue to boil the frog? It was going pretty well for them, demographics were/are on their side, the ‘far right’ parties are still marginalised almost everywhere.

So why did they kick over the table by opening the gates to the barbarian hordes?

* Humans are tribal by nature and forcibly trying to blend “tribes’ doesn’t work and has never worked.

* We have the truth on our side. Now we just need to spread it.

I have more or less converted my millennial girlfriend into a Nazi, and am making headway with my circle of friends.

My tactic is to not hit them with the full shitlord tsunami at once.

Instead I make fairly benign jokes and observations that nobody with a functioning pattern recognition system could possibly deny are true. Once I’m able to get them laughing at & agreeing with “sexist” & “racist” facts, that is the thin end of the wedge.

From there I slowly and steadily increase the flow of information, always pushing the envelope of their comfort.

Some SWPLs are too far gone to save, but many normal people are only going along with obvious falsehoods because they believe that is what decent, respectable people do. Once they are given permission to openly express reality and put their own interests first, they jump right in. I

Right now we have some strong tailwinds making it easy. The Donald has expanded the scope of publicly acceptable opinions, and that the news is full of non-white invasions & catastrophes.

My hopeful prediction: There’s going to be a tipping point, when the number of real talkers hits critical mass & people realize just how many millions of Americans share their opinions without apology. Then it will be self-sustaining, especially if some media and entertainment enterprises realize that it will be lucrative to give that ravenous mass of newly aware shitlord a what it wants.

Once it becomes self-sustaining, that mass is going to become more and more radicalized, too. The Red Pill has so many levels; nobody gets it all at once. Especially if you have to break through decades of Blue Pill conditioning to absorb it.

For me it took about two years to process the pill, starting with Women Lie & Feminism Sucks, then Equality is a Lie Too & Diversity Sucks, then as I started to put the pieces together about who pushed all that garbage into my brain — I got to The Jewish Question & answered it. (Jews didn’t do it all, but they certainly helped)

If enough men in this country went through that same process, I am confident that things here would never be the same again.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off

Marc Gafni Defends Return to Spotlight as Backlash Gathers Steam

Posted on January 7, 2016 by Luke Ford

Forward.com:

Marc Gafni, a once-promising Jewish leader dogged by allegations of sexual improprieties stretching back years, has returned to the public eye as a leader of a California think tank.
But his stunning re-emergence, trumpeted in a recent New York Times article, has elicited a new wave of condemnations from Jewish leaders.

Rabbi David Ingber, an influential Renewal rabbi in New York who once studied with Gafni but has long since severed ties, says anyone who knows Gafni has a responsibility to warn others about him.
“We are calling for other organizations to pull their support for him,” said Ingber. “We did not do enough before to warn people about this person. I feel responsible. I am implicated.”
Ingber organized a petition of denouncement, which carries the names of around 100 other Jewish leaders, including rabbis Donniel Hartman, Avi Weiss, Sharon Kleinbaum, Ebn Leader and Joseph Telushkin. The petition specifically names Whole Foods, whose co-founder and CEO, John Mackey, is on the board of Gafni’s think tank. Posted on December 30, it now has more than 2,500 signatories.
Aleph, an umbrella organization for the Jewish Renewal movement, where Gafni was once a popular figure, also issued a statement. “The latest attempted re-emergence of Marc Gafni as self-described spiritual leader galvanizes all who care about genuine spirituality to stand up for high ethical standards,” the group wrote. “Marc Gafni is not a rabbi or spiritual leader recognized by Aleph.”
Gafni, 55, told the Forward that he no longer sees himself as part of the organized Jewish community and was seemingly unconcerned with the pushback from religious leaders.
“I am not associated with the [Jewish] community in any official or unofficial way,” Gafni said, speaking over the phone in California. “I don’t publically identify or practice as a rabbi,” but “I draw on the rabbinic lineage every day, it’s what inspires me.”
And Gafni said his latest foray, the latest in his decades-long career, should not be seen as a threat to anyone.
“I’ve left the spiritual teaching world and am functioning as the president of an activist think tank, which is writing a new set of books which are committed to evolving the source code of culture.”

Posted in Marc Gafni | Comments Off