LATEST POSTS:
- PragerU Salaries & Bonuses
- The David Pinsof Story
- Added Context to the Dennis Prager-Cedars Sinai Lawsuit
- The Criticism Was Right and It Did Nothing: Andrew Gelman, Seth Roberts, and the Limits of Being Correct
- What Andrew Gelman Doesn’t Write About
- Andrew Gelman: ‘Computer scientists today are like economists in the early 2000s and Freudian psychiatrists in the 1950s’
- Virtue Signaling and the Amy Wax case
- Revisiting Virtually You: The Dangerous Powers of the E-Personality
- The Great Delusion
- Why Do I Instinctively Dislike Erik Erikson?
- WSJ: The Uninvited Guest Who Crashed Our Family Vacation: My Mom’s AI Chatbot
- WEHT to Marc Weisblott?
- WEHT to Moxie aka Madison Slade?
- WEHT to Nicholas Polson’s Archive?
- Cohen Passes His Own Audit (V2)
- Andrew Gelman & the E-Personality
- ‘(1) “Do you think the culture of research has genuinely changed since the replication crisis became widely discussed, or has it mostly generated new compliance rituals around pre-registration and open data while leaving the underlying incentive structure intact?, (2) Regarding Columbia University, “is there a statistical or social scientific way of understanding how institutions lose the ability to accurately perceive their own situation?”’
- What a Public Audit Does (V4)
- Post: ‘Nathan Cofnas the Schlimazel’
- Philip N. Cohen and the Sociology of the Denominator
BEST POSTS:
- * The Enlightenment Wasn’t Enlightened (6-23-26)
* Mr. Burge Draws The Line (6-23-26)
* 'Improving on Democracy' (6-17-26)
* People Leak To People Who Are Fun (6-11-26)
* Why Does Australia Produce So Many Great Journalists? (6-11-26)
* Steve Wynn and the Press: Power, Litigation, and the Contest Over Las Vegas (6-3-26)
* Sheldon Adelson and the Journalists (6-3-26)
* The Vigilant Animal: Thinkers Who Reject the Myth of Human Gullibility (6-2-26)
* The Cost of Refusing the Misunderstanding Myth (6-2-26)
* Show Me How It Travels (6-2-26)
* The Norm Explainers (6-2-26)
* Centering Marginalized Voices (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Washington Post put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Financial Times put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for the Los Angeles Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for The New York Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* Why Wembanyama Lives on the Perimeter (5-31-26)
* The Emotional Palettes Of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco & Sacramento (5-27-26)
* The Administrative Capital: Sacramento Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* San Diego - The Quiet Republic (5-27-26)
* The Quiet Bar: San Diego Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* SF v LA Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* Why Talent Travels Poorly Between San Francisco and Los Angeles (5-27-26)
* San Francisco and Los Angeles as Rival Models of Urban Access (5-27-26)
* Social Cliques in New York, 2026 (5-25-26)
* Social Cliques in San Francisco, 2026 (5-25-26)
* The Rival Courts of Washington (5-25-26)
* The City of Private Rooms (5-25-26)
Category Archives: R. Daniel Sperber
Halakhic Liberal Democracy 3.0: Expert Capture in Sperber’s Project and Hollander’s Analysis
R. Daniel Sperber’s Modern Orthodoxy project wants to give more power to experts with elite secular educations such as himself. Stephen Turner’s work on expertise and democracy is a good tool for examining the expert capture of a communal practice. … Continue reading
Posted in R. Daniel Sperber, Stephen Turner
Comments Off on Halakhic Liberal Democracy 3.0: Expert Capture in Sperber’s Project and Hollander’s Analysis
R. Daniel Sperber and the Historicization of Halakha
R. Daniel Sperber (b. 1940) occupies an unusual position in postwar Orthodox Jewish scholarship. He combines the sensibility of a classical philologist with the responsibilities of a working halakhist, and the result is a body of work that has reshaped … Continue reading
Posted in R. Daniel Sperber
Comments Off on R. Daniel Sperber and the Historicization of Halakha
Strange Bedfellows in the Beit Midrash: Coalition Politics in Sperber’s Project and Hollander’s Analysis
David Pinsof, David O. Sears, and Martie G. Haselton’s “Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems” gives the reader the tools to see what Hollander cannot see and what Sperber cannot afford to admit. The framework is simple. … Continue reading
Posted in R. Aviad Hollander, R. Daniel Sperber
Comments Off on Strange Bedfellows in the Beit Midrash: Coalition Politics in Sperber’s Project and Hollander’s Analysis
Convenient Beliefs in the Halakhic Beit Midrash: Sperber, Hollander, and the Sociology of What Cannot Be Said
Applying Stephen Turner’s frame of convenient beliefs to the Daniel Sperber controversy yields reinterprets a beit midrash that has become methodologically aware of itself. Convenient beliefs, in Turner’s account, are the beliefs that survive within a profession because holding them … Continue reading
Posted in R. Aviad Hollander, R. Daniel Sperber
Comments Off on Convenient Beliefs in the Halakhic Beit Midrash: Sperber, Hollander, and the Sociology of What Cannot Be Said
The Humanistic Halakha and the Crisis of Rabbinic Authority: On Aviad Hollander’s Study of Daniel Sperber
R. Aviad Hollander’s study of Rabbi Prof. Daniel Sperber’s (b. 1940) halakhic methodology, “The Humanistic Halakha: Clarifying the Nature of Rabbi Prof. Daniel Sperber’s Approach to Halakha,” recognizes that the contemporary crisis of halakhic authority is about power as expressed … Continue reading
Posted in R. Aviad Hollander, R. Daniel Sperber
Comments Off on The Humanistic Halakha and the Crisis of Rabbinic Authority: On Aviad Hollander’s Study of Daniel Sperber