Category Archives: R. Aviad Hollander

The Question MO Will Not Ask

Do you accept historicism (that everything is a product of a time and place)? If not, on what grounds? The question is simple to state. It is difficult to answer. It is the question Modern Orthodox scholarship will not ask, … Continue reading

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Modern Orthodox, R. Aviad Hollander, R. Shlomo Goren | Comments Off on The Question MO Will Not Ask

What Hollander Does Not Say: Pinsof’s Frame and the Coalitional Silences of a Religious Zionist Sociologist

David Pinsof’s essay “A Big Misunderstanding” attacks intellectuals who diagnose social pathologies as misunderstandings. The classic move: people are biased, ignorant, propagandized; the intellectual brings clarity; the problem dissolves once the diagnosis spreads. R. Aviad Hollander is not the intellectual … Continue reading

Posted in R. Aviad Hollander | Comments Off on What Hollander Does Not Say: Pinsof’s Frame and the Coalitional Silences of a Religious Zionist Sociologist

Strange Bedfellows in the Beit Midrash: Coalition Politics in Sperber’s Project and Hollander’s Analysis

David Pinsof, David O. Sears, and Martie G. Haselton’s “Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems” gives the reader the tools to see what Hollander cannot see and what Sperber cannot afford to admit. The framework is simple. … Continue reading

Posted in R. Aviad Hollander, R. Daniel Sperber | Comments Off on Strange Bedfellows in the Beit Midrash: Coalition Politics in Sperber’s Project and Hollander’s Analysis

Convenient Beliefs in the Halakhic Beit Midrash: Sperber, Hollander, and the Sociology of What Cannot Be Said

Applying Stephen Turner’s frame of convenient beliefs to the Daniel Sperber controversy yields reinterprets a beit midrash that has become methodologically aware of itself. Convenient beliefs, in Turner’s account, are the beliefs that survive within a profession because holding them … Continue reading

Posted in R. Aviad Hollander, R. Daniel Sperber | Comments Off on Convenient Beliefs in the Halakhic Beit Midrash: Sperber, Hollander, and the Sociology of What Cannot Be Said

The Humanistic Halakha and the Crisis of Rabbinic Authority: On Aviad Hollander’s Study of Daniel Sperber

R. Aviad Hollander’s study of Rabbi Prof. Daniel Sperber’s (b. 1940) halakhic methodology, “The Humanistic Halakha: Clarifying the Nature of Rabbi Prof. Daniel Sperber’s Approach to Halakha,” recognizes that the contemporary crisis of halakhic authority is about power as expressed … Continue reading

Posted in R. Aviad Hollander, R. Daniel Sperber | Comments Off on The Humanistic Halakha and the Crisis of Rabbinic Authority: On Aviad Hollander’s Study of Daniel Sperber

‘Zionist-Messianic Halakha’

Aviad Hollander’s chapter “Zionist-Messianic Halakha” reconstructs Rabbi Shlomo Goren (1917-1994) as a theorist of sovereign Jewish existence. Hollander shows that Goren’s halakhic rulings emerge from a theology of history. The establishment of the State of Israel constitutes for Goren a … Continue reading

Posted in R. Aviad Hollander, R. Shlomo Goren | Comments Off on ‘Zionist-Messianic Halakha’

Halachic Multiculturalism and the Crisis of the People’s Army: Women’s Singing, Sovereignty, and Jurisprudential Transformation in the IDF

Aviad Yehiel Hollander’s 2014 article, “Halachic Multiculturalism in the IDF: Rulings of Official Religious Authorities in Israel Concerning ‘Women’s Singing,’” remains an indispensable analysis of the evolving relationship among halacha, military sovereignty, and multicultural governance in the State of Israel. … Continue reading

Posted in IDF, R. Aviad Hollander | Comments Off on Halachic Multiculturalism and the Crisis of the People’s Army: Women’s Singing, Sovereignty, and Jurisprudential Transformation in the IDF

‘Danger, Slippery Slope!’

R. Aviad Hollander’s essay “סכנה, מדרון חלקלק!” (“Danger, Slippery Slope!”) exposes the structural tensions the return of Jewish sovereignty generates. At first glance, the essay seems to address a familiar controversy inside contemporary Religious Zionism: the integration of women into … Continue reading

Posted in IDF, R. Aviad Hollander, R. Shlomo Goren | Comments Off on ‘Danger, Slippery Slope!’

Rabbi Eliezer and the Governance of Reproduction: Sexual Discipline, Porous Anthropology, and Covenantal Survival in Late Antique Rabbinic Judaism

A review essay on Yitzchak Roness and Aviad Yehiel Hollander, “How Shall the Children Be Beautiful: Rabbi Eliezer and Eugenics in the Eyes of the Sages,” Jewish Studies, an Internet Journal 10 (2012): 25–44. The testimony of Imma Shalom (fl. … Continue reading

Posted in R. Aviad Hollander, Talmud | Comments Off on Rabbi Eliezer and the Governance of Reproduction: Sexual Discipline, Porous Anthropology, and Covenantal Survival in Late Antique Rabbinic Judaism

The Bounded Sovereign: Eglah Arufah and the Architecture of Delegated Responsibility

Few of the Torah’s legal and ritual institutions rival eglah arufah for conceptual strangeness or political suggestion. Deuteronomy 21 describes the rite. A corpse turns up in an open field. The murderer is unknown. The elders of the nearest city … Continue reading

Posted in R. Aviad Hollander | Comments Off on The Bounded Sovereign: Eglah Arufah and the Architecture of Delegated Responsibility