Forward: ‘Is 15 Minutes Enough Time For Trump At Yad Vashem?’

How much time should American presidents be required to spend at Yad Vashem? (Forward)

American Jewish historian Peter Novick writes in his book The Holocaust in American Life:

…In the late sixties and early seventies, at the same time that the arrival of the “new anti-Semitism” was announced, American Jewish organizations were changing their priorities and their posture, a change that has so far proved permanent. It is probably best described as an inward turn — a shift away from the previously dominant “integrationist” perspective and toward an emphasis on the defense of distinctive Jewish interests, a kind of circling of the wagons…

The qualifications for certification as a Righteous Gentile [by Yad Vashem] had little connection with the everyday meaning of “righteousness”: following accepted moral norms and doing what people could reasonably be expected to do. The criteria were to have risked one’s life, and often the lives of the members of one’s family as well, to save another; to have displayed self-sacrificing heroism of the highest and rarest order. At Yad Vashem nominees for Righteous Gentiles are carefully screened. Often the process takes many years, and the most rigorous standards are applied. (Thus fishermen who transported Danish Jews to Sweden in 1943 are not eligible because they were paid.)

The intention of most commemoration of the “righteous minority” has been to damn the vast “unrighteous majority.” The article “Righteous among the Nations,” in The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, stresses that “the acts of those few show that aid and rescue were possible…had there been more high-minded people.” The director of Yad Vashem’s Department of the Righteous explained that “spicing” the history of the Holocaust with stories of rescuers were indispensable in showing the delinquency of European Christians “against the background of the righteous.” In the United States, the head of the Anti-Defamation League discussed a book by the director of the ADL’s Foundation for Christian Rescuers. He insisted that “what is important about the book is that the reader comes away understanding that rescue of Jews was a rare phenomenon. [The fact is] that 700 million people lived in Nazi-occupied Europe; to date 11,000 have been honored by Yad Vashem for rescuing Jews. The ratio of unrighteous to righteous gentiles — thousands to one — is repeatedly underlined by commentators. “For every righteous person,” said Benjamin Meed, “there were thousands upon thousands who collaborated…or who, at best, stood idly by and did nothing.”

Those who have written or spoken about gentile rescuers, for purposes other than underlining their rarity, report that they often receive a hostile reception from Jewish audiences. …But the institutional use of the commemoration of Righteous Gentiles as “the exceptions that prove the rule” has usually been in the service of shoring up that mentality — promoting a wary suspicion of gentiles… “When I move to a new town,” writes a university teacher, “I give great thought to whom, among my gentile friends, I might entrust my children, should that ever become necessary.” A prominent Jewish feminist: “Every conscious Jew longs to ask her or his non-Jewish friends, ‘Would you hide me?’ — and suppresses the question for fear of hearing the sounds of silence.” A professor of psychology:

“Many Jews report that the unspoken question they ask themselves when interacting with a non-Jew is, ‘Would she or he have saved me from the Nazis?’ I have asked myself this question innumerable times: sometimes I surprise myself by answering, ‘I don’t know,’ when asking this question of a non-Jewish friend I had otherwise assumed was close to me. The answer is the ultimate standard by which to measure trust in a non-Jewish person.”

Hovering over all of this is the absurd maxim In extremis veritas — that it is imagining the most desperate circumstances that one gains insight into what gentiles really think of Jews. To be preoccupied with the question of whether one could be sure that one would be saved by gentile friends if a holocaust came to America is to actively solicit anxiety and doubt, because who could ever be sure of such a thing? The asking of this pointless question seems to have become culturally approved, a sign that one has learned “the lesson of the Holocaust.”

Posted in Holocaust | Comments Off on Forward: ‘Is 15 Minutes Enough Time For Trump At Yad Vashem?’

Child Molester Joel Grishaver Getting A Lifetime Achievement Award For Educating Kids

A man emails me:

I found your article online about Joel Grishaver. I was one of the many boys from Camp Alonim that was molested by Joel.

It’s come to my attention that Joel is about to receive a lifetime achievement award from an organization called the New CAJE. I have reached out to them to inform them of his past.

If you would care to do the same, you can do so at (857)288-8765 or [email protected].

I am stunned that this man has had such a successful career without more people knowing about his past.

A few years ago, Joel applied to teach at Limmud LA but some of his victims blocked him.

Posted in Joel Grishaver | Comments Off on Child Molester Joel Grishaver Getting A Lifetime Achievement Award For Educating Kids

How The Old Testament Explains Life Today

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* I don’t want to bring in the Old Testament but there’s an enormous and vulnerable pattern involving Semitic tribalist grievance reasoning, which connects almost every leftoid program.
(This is highly developed and documented among a certain religio-ethnic group, but I use the word “Semitic” deliberately because it is not unique to them. It is probably an inescapable result of tribalism and diversity. There are many “convenient grievances” in Islam, notably Palestine and Shi’ism.)
Their story, for every case from blacks to mestizos to (at one time) blue collar workers to women, is always an adaptation of Exodus or Esther, and this both cuts off some options and sets up others. Once you learn the myths (which in this case means seeing the fallacies vindicated by tradition and why they are necessary) and start to look for the patterns, their words and actions have a visible logic and can be predicted. Or at least you can see what they won’t do and why.
They are not normal people in a political discussion looking for a policy solution. They are wronged superior beings, held back by a nefarious conspiracy, itself only made possible by their own failure to maintain traditions and respect their prophets.

* JOKE: using logic and factual evidence to express disagreement with someone.

WOKE: using [not-an-argument] to express disagreement with someone.

Posted in Bible | Comments Off on How The Old Testament Explains Life Today

Vox: “Charles Murray Is Once Again Peddling Junk Science About Race and IQ”

Steve Sailer writes:

Getting worked up over Charles Murray being allowed on a podcast seems a little bizarre. (Here’s the podcast.)

Under the faux indignation and clickbait headline, however, this is about as good an attempt as any to shore up the Conventional Wisdom that the racial differences in average intelligence can’t be influenced by genetics at all. So I’ll go through a chunk of it, adding comments.

Interestingly, the article, when read carefully, is also about how Charles Murray is mostly so much more right than the Conventional Wisdom about IQ. But he’s still a Witch! The article is another one of these attempts to fight back against today’s rampant Science Denialism while not being accused of witchcraft yourself.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on Vox: “Charles Murray Is Once Again Peddling Junk Science About Race and IQ”

Steve Sailer: What Apple Has Been Up to Since Steve Jobs Died

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* It would be instructive to know what it was about California that so appealed to Steve Jobs.

* Well in his absence his widow has certainly been working overtime to turn it into Mexico.

* Here’s an idea for an alternate history novel (steal it, by all means):
Steve Jobs is still alive (saved by some biotech startup, no doubt), wants to be more public-spirited, and so as part of some grand peace deal, he “returns” to his ancestral homeland to replace Assad as President of Syria, which he remakes into a giant Apple campus.
Come to think of it, isn’t that pretty much the SJW dream?

* Yes, we’ve seen this movie before. Big company makes lots of cash, blows some on a fancy HQ, then sags into mediocrity.

American homeowners do it too. They buy their first home when they can. They keep working and the lucky ones go up the ladder and make good money. Then they blow that income by borrowing up the wazoo for a McMansion. Then all their monthly income from their now well-paying job goes to mortgage, interest, property tax and maintenance. They make themselves house poor.

My father climbed in a big corporation that did this same thing. I remember touring the new headquarters on the big ranch they’d bought at the foot of the Rocky Mountains. They’d moved all of us to another state for this. They had cash. The place was a 1970s designer’s wet dream. I even remember custom woven, 3-D artwork lining hallways. Dad’s new office looked out over an amazing landscape. Parking garage? Ha! Spiral ramps took you and your vehicle up to the roof overlooking the scenery.

A Dow Jones industrial, my father’s company crapped itself in a few years. Now William Buffett owns it.

Mr. Buffett has lived in the same, suburban, stucco house in Omaha for decades.

* Have you ever been to California? There are mountains right up against the ocean, enormous canyons backed by painted deserts, and forests of giant trees surrounding crystal blue alpine lakes, all right above vineyards and beaches with a perfect Mediterranean climate. Then, right in the middle of all of that, are two enormous, fascinating, chaotic cities, both built on impossible dreams, fame in one case and boundless innovation in the other, and in each the entire world of cuisine and culture is available at your fingertips.

As long as you never have to worry about money and never have to commute during rush hour, California is a paradise on Earth, and both of those conditions applied to Steve Jobs.

* In crowded European cities it is common to have underground parking garages. On top you see a lovely plaza or a park and the only thing visible above ground is a ramp entrance.

However, I’m sure that must cost more than an above ground structure and there are limits to how deep you can go. In NY, the city is built on bedrock which is great for skyscraper foundations but the only way to dig a hole is with explosives. In other cities there is plenty of land available for parking garages and even surface lots since the white people fled to the suburbs (thus necessitating the car in the 1st place) and the businesses to suburban shopping malls.

I have been in dozens of US cities where everyone drives downtown from the suburbs, parks in the parking garage, works in the office tower and then at 5PM they get back in their car and flee back to the suburbs. Often they never literally set foot on the streets. Some cities even have tunnel or skyway systems so even if you are walking you still don’t have to be on the street. After dark and on weekends you could shoot a cannon down the main streets in the downtown business district and not hit anyone. These places strike me as sad and depressing and the postwar replacement public spaces (e.g. shopping malls) are sterile and corporate and dedicated to commerce above all. There are no real civic spaces and no real civic life.

Part of the problem is that much of the US does not have a Mediterranean climate. It’s hot as hell in the summer and cold in the winter so no one wants to be out on the street. But even in places where the climate is great, people are still in their cars. I don’t know what caused it (black criminality causing whites to flee was one element but not the only element) or how to fix it but it really sucks.

* America culture demands to be very nice and friendly to each other. Thus it saps lots of energy. Staying away from people saves energy. European do not pretend to be friendly and nice to strangers, so they can handle each other better. Neighbors live w/o ver acknowledging each other. Also by not being friendly in Europe you do not feel you are risking your life.

New York city is much more normal. Not friendly but to the point. People can be very helpful and useful in NYC. For example they tell you “F.. if know”, instead of wasting your time giving you wrong directions when you are in Midwest, because they just feel compelled to be helpful even if the can’t. BTW, Brits are also awful in giving directions.

* “After dark and on weekends you could shoot a cannon down the main streets in the downtown business district and not hit anyone.”

Here in Northern California that describes downtown Sacramento. 8pm there looks like it’s 4am in the morning. That’s how dead it is there as soon as it gets dark. It looks like the Will Smith film I Am Legend.

A city with a population of almost 500,000 thousand people like Sactown should not be so dead. I can’t imagine a European city with a similar population size as Sacramento being so lifeless in it’s downtown area.

* California is not completely ruined yet. It is after all a very big place. In the Bay Area megalopolis the Berkeley Hills from Castro Valley to El Cerrito are still lovely as they were developed early and are protected on their east side by East Bay Park and Utility District reservoir land. Much of the North Coast and the Sierras are still relatively undeveloped as is the Central Coast from Point Conception to San Francisco where, unlike in Southern California, the Coastal Commission has actually been able to enforce the rules set out in 1972′s Proposition 20.

* BTW, the places with the “good” schools are now often heavily Asian (both East and South). Those schools are so “good” that white people sometime avoid them because the atmosphere is too competitive. White people are like Goldilocks – they want their schools not too hard and not too soft.

People here make fun of Asians as being mindless drones without creativity but the next generation of soft, lazy white people are going to get their lunch eaten by Asians, both here and abroad. People have NO idea what China is planning, nor do the Chinese want you to know. It will make what Japan did in the ’30s look like a joke. And this time the Asians have their own nukes. The Chinese would much rather that America destroy itself with political infighting and worrying about whether Trump is Putin’s gay lover and whether Black Lives Matter. For now they are biding their time because they still need trade with the West. By the time people realize what hit them, it will be too late.

* Check out where the “Tech Titans” live.

Jobs – before he died – bought a house in Woodside, Calif (one built by Julia Morgan, the famed architect who designed Hearst Castle). Woodside, for those not familiar with the Bay Area, is a rural town north and west of the real “valley.” It retains a highly rustic flavour, with many tracts large enough to have horses. They have zoning laws that forbid parcels less than an acre, so cheap, tract housing or apartments with 10 adults to a room are effectively banned.

It looks very much the same now as it did in 1960.

Many of the others are not different. Larry Ellison also lives in Woodside.

Sheryl Sandberg lives just across 280 in Atherton, which also has almost zero retail or commercial, and restricts lots to 1 acre or more.

These guys do not care about the impact of their policies on America, because they simply build a wall between the effects and their own lives.

* Have you ever smelled the sweet eucalyptus mingling with the cool breeze as it blows off the Pacific as you head into Santa Cruz, or Capitola? Have you watched the sun set at the Marin Headlands, Stinson Beach or Half Moon Bay? Can you remember biting into the most lucious peach ever while standing in the farmers market in San Fran, picked yesterday from an orchard on the other side of the bay? Have you stood at the base of El Capitan, gazing up as the brilliant light bounces off the granite and forms rainbows in the mist of the waterfalls flowing into the Merced River? Have you ridden a bike down the PCH from Monterrey to Slo-town? If you have done any of these things, I don’t know how you can ask this question.

I know of no place with a more fortuitous confluence of climate, terrain and sheer natural beauty than California. Jobs had a superb aesthetic sense. None of the virtues of california were lost on him. He could see there could beauty in simple typeface, and that each person could have a tiny moment of transcendence if the materials, design and workmanship of an everyday thing like your cell phone gave you a shiver when you touched it. Having the object respond perfectly to your desire, requiring no effort or though on your part as you used it was part of his vision. How could a person like Jobs not appreciate California in the 50s and 60s? Who doesn’t yearn for it now?

Life is short. Beauty is rare and fleeting.

Posted in Apple, California | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: What Apple Has Been Up to Since Steve Jobs Died

Who killed the Armenians? Muslims

Dennis Prager writes:

The Journal’s editor-in-chief, Rob Eshman, recently wrote a column under the headline “Morgenthau’s Children,” about the film “The Promise,” whose subject is the Armenian genocide, and he addressed the subject of genocide in general. It was important to remind — or inform — people about the lesser-known genocides of the 20th century and the present century.

He noted the following genocides:

The Armenian genocide
“Those in Syria in Iraq”
The ISIS extermination of the Yazidis
“The failed state of Somalia”
The Myanmar government’s “persecution, deportation and starvation” of the Rohingya
But there is a word missing from all the genocides mentioned in Rob’s column.

That word is “Muslim.”

Every one of the genocides listed — with the exception of Myanmar (formerly Burma), where the victims are Muslims — was, or is being, committed by Muslims.

I don’t believe Rob intentionally omitted the fact that the perpetrators of all but one of the annihilations was/is Muslim. The fact is that with all the attention paid to the Armenian genocide, one always hears that the Armenians were mass murdered by the “Ottoman Empire” or the “Ottoman Turks” or the “Turkish regime” — but they are never identified as Muslims.

Rob rightly suggested that readers go to GenocideWatch.com for more information.

I took his advice, and here are headlines I saw on the site’s front page:

“Holocaust museum condemns ‘torture and killing of gay men’ in Chechnya”

“Violent Mortality in the Darfur Genocide”

“Syria: ‘Glimmers of humanity’ overshadowed by brutality of attacks on civilians”

“How Germany used Islam during World War I”

(Other headlines included news about Brazil, Auschwitz, Rwanda and Cambodia.)

Again, almost all genocide discussion was about Islam.

One of the least truthful major statements in the history of the modern American presidency was that of President George W. Bush, when he famously declared after 9/11 that “Islam is a religion of peace.”

I understand why Bush felt he had to say and keep repeating that line. But there is no excuse for all the academics and journalists who say it. Islam was a religion of war and violence from its inception, when Muslims forcibly converted surrounding tribes and then all of North Africa to Islam.

Muslims perpetrated the greatest slaughter of one group in history — the slaughter of about 80 million Hindus during the thousand-year history of Muslim rule in India. They even boasted about this slaughter by naming a large area of present-day of Afghanistan “Hindu Kush,” which means “Hindu-Slaughter.”

Posted in Genocide, Islam | Comments Off on Who killed the Armenians? Muslims

Are You Addicted to Love?

From The Fix:

Sex addiction, says Sarah Osborne, Director of Clinical Operations at Mountainside Treatment Center, involves preoccupation with sexual acts, and over time, the need for increased risk level associated with them. The sexual acts aren’t about the partner, only about the ‘high’ from the acts.

“A person becomes restless or irritable when unable to engage, and the person with the sex addiction is often aloof or avoidant of developing emotional bonds with their partners,” she said.

Love addiction, on the other hand, is qualified by a person using relationships to avoid life issues. A person with love addiction feels the high from the romance, fantasy, and intrigue of the developing relationships and the perceived connection of being “with” someone, and becomes uneasy when away from the person.

“Their relationships are often chaotic with a ‘come here but go away’ style of connection due to the inability to develop true intimacy,” says Osborne.

Posted in Addiction | Comments Off on Are You Addicted to Love?

Trying the Landmark Course

Amy Dresner writes: But by far the most off-putting thing to me was the marketing, the hard sell from the stage. The philosophy was interesting but the constant barrage of proselytizing under the guise of “enrollment” felt icky and violating…like somebody who invited you out to dinner and never stopped asking to borrow money.

In between hours of “witnessing” where people came up to the microphone and creepily beamed how well their calls to reconnect went, was again the push for us to sign up to do the next course. Notecards were handed out. I refused to put my name on it and handed it back empty. The next morning next to my name tag on the table was the same enrollment form but this time it had my name written on it. And again I heard the whole “don’t you wanna be even more free? Don’t you want to accomplish your dreams and make a difference? That’s what level two is about.” Who’s gonna say “No, no. I wanna stay a slave and small. Don’t take off my shackles.” Such a mind fuck but I saw right through it and it made me really angry, so angry that I was beginning not to be open to the philosophy part.

Posted in Landmark | Comments Off on Trying the Landmark Course

Whither Trump?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Ingraham and Coulter continue to righteously bash Trump & family for the dishonest campaign. These two ladies cannot be bought off.

Ingraham has major contacts on white house staff and she reamed Kushner today and accused him of being a big leaker maybe the big leaker.

Drudge left the Coulter interview at the top of the page all day to send another frigging message to bubble boy Trump.

But the core problem remains: Trump did this all to himself by filling his govt with neocons and lib dems.

Apparently Trump is not getting the message as Roger Stone said today that every name on the real Comey replacement list is some version of nevertrumper… WTF.

* Trump is often silly at times, and certainly the least presidential of any president in my lifetime – he recently said in an interview that being president was much harder than he thought, and phrased it in his usual style – Wow! I didn’t know it was going to be this much work! Or something like that. But how do his failings so far stack up with the failings of the other presidents of my lifetime? Pretty minor by comparison.

Most of his “folly” is a function of presentation by the media. Obama’s weird and foolish mother-in-law lived in the White House for 8 years, and that resulted in how many SNL skits? Yeah, right. Obama’s weird and creepy African relatives lived in the US for years contrary to immigration law, partly because Obama bent the rules so they could stay. And that resulted in how many news investigations and front page headlines? Yeah, right.

* Let’s assume it is true(questionable to doubtful).
According to several bloggers including Gregg Jarrett, a lawyer from Fox News,
Comey had a duty to immediately inform DOJ of “real” obstruction of justice under 18 USC 4 and 28 USC 1361.
Apparently, obstruction requires intent, not just “why don’t you go easy on Flynn, he resigned, he’s a good guy” man-to-man talk.
The investigation continues unabated.
We are witnessing a strong attempt at a coup d’etat.
If it is successful , the Deep State truly rules America.
If unsuccessful, some people need to go to jail.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Whither Trump?

NPR: All Across Latin America, Unwed Mothers Are Now The Norm

NPR: Latin America is now the region that has the highest percentage of children born out of wedlock. In Colombia, 84 percent of all children are born to unmarried mothers. Argentina, Mexico, Chile and other countries throughout the region have similar numbers, with well over half of all children born outside wedlock.

In less than a generation in Argentina, the traditional definition of a family has given way to new interpretations. And it’s happening at all economic levels — educated, middle-class women are now among the many choosing to have kids alone or in an informal union.

Posted in Latino | Comments Off on NPR: All Across Latin America, Unwed Mothers Are Now The Norm