We’re All Human Beings

Cleveland Jewish News: When Donald J. Trump announced a proposal for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until the country’s representatives can figure out what is going on,” criticism poured in.
The condemnation came swiftly from his fellow candidates, from national organizations – and from local rabbis.
One example was Rabbi Richard A. Block, senior rabbi at The Temple-Tifereth Israel in Beachwood and Cleveland, who took to Facebook with strong feelings about the New York business magnate’s proposal.
“In a political season when a leading presidential candidate advocates the exclusion of Muslims from our country, we understand anew the importance of the Torah’s commandments to ‘love your neighbor as yourself’ and to ‘love the stranger,’ and of Hillel’s teaching that ‘what is hateful to you, do not do to another. That is the whole Torah. All the rest is commentary. Go and learn,’” Block wrote. “How many radicals will (Trump) inspire to commit mass murder? If we remain silent in the face of Trump’s despicable proposal to ban Muslims from entering the U.S., we become complicit in it.”
For Rabbi Rosette Barron Haim, also of The Temple-Tifereth Israel, Trump’s proposal hit home – as in her family’s ancestral home in Turkey, where her family had many Muslim friends.
“I’m just very much aware that not all Muslims feel the same way about any given issue really,” Haim said. “It’s never good to lump all people, all minorities into any one category. I think that’s as true for Muslims as it is for people of Jewish background. That’s what they did in the countries where they wanted to persecute the Jews was that they made a generalization from an experience with perhaps just a few people and made policy that way.”
…Block said Jews might be extra sensitive to Trump’s proposal, recalling how Jews attempting to flee Nazism were kept out of the United States, including the famed case of the MS St. Louis, a ship with nearly 1,000 refugees forced to turn back toward Europe.
“I believe that the Jewish people’s experience with bigotry, persecution and rejection should stimulate special sensitivity to discrimination against other minorities,” Block wrote in an email. “We still recall with bitterness that the doors of the world were shut in the face of Jews attempting to flee Nazism. The vast majority of American Jews are the descendants of immigrants. The Torah reminds us more than 30 times that we were strangers in the land of Egypt.”
It’s hard to find a parallel for Trump’s proposal in American history – a time when an entire race or religious group was denied entry into the United States.
Certainly, Jewish refugees from Europe during World War II were denied entry due to a “nativist movement tinged with hysteria about hidden spies,” according to Jay Geller, Samuel Rosenthal Professor of Judaic Studies at Case Western Reserve University. Geller noted “active anti-Semitism” in the State Department and that officials had “carte blanche” to refuse German Jews. In that case, however, there were already quotas in place from the Immigration Act of 1924, which aided American efforts to prevent immigration of undesirables.
“America at that point simply needed to admit far more German Jews than the law stipulated they could and there was no widespread movement among non-Jewish-Americans to revise the quota or make an exception,” Geller said.
The idea of keeping out a seemingly dangerous minority then is not new. Still, his proposal is fairly unique in American history.
As a result, it’s also difficult to imagine how it would work. How would American authorities be able to figure out if someone was Muslim?
“The very first thing I thought was how would border control in this country even know who’s Muslim,” Geller said.
Geller said that the Germans solved that problem by putting a big red “J” on the passport of Jewish citizens, allowing other European countries like Switzerland to easily deny them. Most countries, however, including the United States, don’t put religion on one’s passport.
“I think the important thing is to remember that they’re all human beings,” Haim said. “We’re all human beings.”

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on We’re All Human Beings

W.Va. rabbi says Trump is speaking to “small group of people” with Muslim ban proposal

REPORT:

“It speaks of the broader problem that our country always has to fight against and that is ignorance, hatred and xenophobia,” said Rabbi Victor Urecki, longtime rabbi and spiritual leader with the B’nai Jacob Synagogue in Charleston.

“He is speaking to a group of people — and it’s a small group of people, but they’re very vocal — that find the stranger is a person to be hated. That’s not the America that I grew up in.”

Urecki was a guest on Tuesday’s MetroNews “Talkline” a day after attending a community meeting involving Muslim, Christian and Jewish leaders at the Islamic Center of West Virginia, located in Kanawha County, that was organized to dispel myths about Islam.

Hundreds of people attended the Monday night event.

“The Muslim community has been speaking out. Unfortunately, they do not have a lot of traction in the media because it’s a softer voice, but they do speak out,” Urecki said of efforts to push back against anti-Muslim rhetoric that has intensified in the wake of the San Bernardino, California terrorist attack that left 14 people dead and more than 20 injured.

On Monday, FBI investigators confirmed Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik, the two shooters who opened fire last Wednesday at San Bernardino’s Inland Regional Center, had been radicalized “for quite some time” and were possibly ISIS sympathizers.

Urecki said he understands very well that the U.S. has its enemies.

“There are people that are an enemy, not just to the American way of life, but immigrants which include Muslims who want to be part of the American experience,” he said.

However, “The overwhelming number of Muslims are not here to damage this country.”

As a Jew, Urecki said he’s bothered by the statements now being made about Muslims. “The same statements that are being said about Muslims were being said about Jews in America in the 1930s,” he said.

Urecki was born in Argentina and moved to the U.S. in 1965.

His father grew up in Argentina, one of the few sanctuary countries for Jewish people fleeing from Poland in 1938. At that time, the United States was not an option. Urecki sees parallels to what Syrian refugees seeking refuge are now facing.

Trump has called for the ban on Muslims entering the U.S. until, “our country’s representatives can figure out what’s going on,” according to a campaign statement. He’d previously proposed surveillance at mosques and the creation of a database of Muslims living in the U.S.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on W.Va. rabbi says Trump is speaking to “small group of people” with Muslim ban proposal

How Donald Trump Stole Hanukkah

Rabbi Aaron Panken writes for HuffPo: “With Donald Trump’s suggestion of banning all Muslims from entering the United States, people of good conscience must raise the alarm. This was not some insignificant hate-monger speaking to a limited band of fanatics — as presidential candidates speak, they define the essential boundaries of what is reasonable discourse in America. The dangerous and irresponsible speech we now hear coming from Mr. Trump has the potential to foster hatred, ignite violence and cause irreparable harm to individuals and our nation at large. When a candidate’s speech veers into such unconstitutional, un-American territory as proposing a religious litmus test for entering our country, the core values of America are in jeopardy.”

I don’t recall many of America’s founding fathers talking about the importance of having lots of Muslims in the country.

The rabbi is scared that Donald Trump is expanding the Overton Window and making it possible for Americans to discuss publicly things the rabbi wants forbidden, such as noticing that different groups tend on average to behave in different ways.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on How Donald Trump Stole Hanukkah

‘Rabbi for Trump’ Gets Behind The Donald on Facebook

From the Forward:

On Facebook there are “Rabbis for Human Rights,” “Rabbis for Bernie” and, until recently, “Rabbis for Hillary.”
Now, these groups are joined by a rabbinical flag-bearer for Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump.
The controversial GOP front-runner’s fiery rhetoric about Muslims may have drawn condemnation from American rabbis and other Jewish leaders across the denominational spectrum, but that hasn’t stopped Rabbi Dr. Bernhard Rosenberg from cheering on The Donald.
A Yeshiva University-educated rabbi who is rabbi emeritus of an Edison, New Jersey, Conservative congregation, Rosenberg started a Facebook group, “Rabbi for Trump,” on Dec. 8. (Originally called “Rabbis for Trump,” he reportedly renamed it after failing to attract many like-minded colleagues.)
The group’s page has 520 “likes” so far, though how many of the likers are actual supporters, as opposed to interested bystanders, is anyone’s guess. So far, the posts consist mostly of praise for Trump, fiery complaints about negative media coverage of the candidate, promotions of Rosenberg’s book and a proud mention that Rosenberg’s congregation hosted the controversial, anti-Muslim blogger-activist Pamela Geller.
Rosenberg told the New Jersey Jewish News he started the group because Trump is “the leader among all the Republicans at this point.”
He added that he also “wanted a vehicle to communicate a very strong message to [Trump] for supporting the State of Israel.”
The rabbi, who is the child of two Holocaust survivors and says he was born in a displaced person’s camp in Germany, shares Trump’s opposition to allowing Syrian refugees into the country.
“My concern is that these Syrian refugees are not being vetted by the FBI,” he told the New Jersey Jewish News.
Rosenberg, who notes frequently (and all in capital letters) on the Rabbi for Trump page, “The Nazis and Hitler murdered most of my family,” told the New Jersey paper he objected to a letter signed by 1,000 rabbis several weeks ago comparing Syrian refugees to Jewish refugees from the Nazis.
“There’s no comparison between this and the Holocaust, where Jews had nowhere to go to. Certainly in this case Europe can take them in and certainly the Arab countries can take them in. I just don’t want something to happen where my children or somebody else’s children live. I think it’s a disservice for Holocaust survivors to make the comparison,” he said.
“The truth is my parents had to go through all sorts of checks and be sponsored … They had to have jobs. I know more about being a refugee than many of these rabbis.”

Posted in Donald Trump, Rabbis | Comments Off on ‘Rabbi for Trump’ Gets Behind The Donald on Facebook

Haaretz: Book Ban: Israel’s New Mainstreaming of Racial Separation

Racial separation is the most natural thing in the world. It’s a common theme throughout Torah — separating Jews from Gentiles, kosher food from trafe food, holiness from impurity, sacred time from secular time, adults from children, men from women.

The more a society fails to make these sorts of distinctions, the more decadent it is.

There is no concept of any such sin as “racism” or “sexism” or “homophobia” or “Islamophobia” prior to the 20th Century. Instead, these were distinctions taken for granted by first-world peoples.

Israel can be a light unto the nations when it shows the world the power of ethno-nationalism.

Us vs them is the most natural division in the world.

Until the 1930s, the phrase “the Jewish race” was widely used. There’s nothing wrong it. Jews are a genetically distinct group.

Haaretz:

Nostalgic White South African diehards are going to be delighted at the spirited defense of racial separation mounted by senior Education Ministry official Dalia Fenig last week.
Not since the end of South African apartheid in 1994 has the policy of apartheid been expounded as explicitly and clearly as in Fenig’s explanation of her disqualification of a novel from inclusion in the general high school curriculum in Israel.
The novel, “Borderlife,” by Dorit Rabinyan, deals with a love affair in New York between a Jewish Israeli woman and a Palestinian man. Last week, it was deemed inappropriate for Israeli high schoolers.
“Young people of adolescent age tend to romanticize and don’t, in many cases, have the systemic vision that includes considerations involving maintaining the national-ethnic identity of the people and the significance of miscegenation,” Fenig is reported as saying in her own defense.
Until recently, Israeli racism could be shrugged off as a consequence of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Animosity and distrust are bound to occur when two national groups clash over their rights and narratives. It was possible to see it as a sort of operational racism that would gradually disappear when the conflict was resolved.
Most of us knew of the bigoted and pernicious Judaism taught by extremist rabbis in the occupied territories, but they and their teachings always seemed to be too obscure and too inconsequential to be taken seriously. Their rants about Jewish exclusivity and blood purity were never going to fly in Tel Aviv.
Well, they’re flying now. Fenig represents mainstream Israel and her thinking has a direct influence on the education our children receive and, by extension, the people they grow up to be. Nor is it just Fenig. She happened to stumble into the limelight, but behind her is Naftali Bennett and the burgeoning forces of darkness that he commands.
It’s worth bearing in mind that the essence of apartheid in South Africa was never segregated park benches or puritan censorship. Those, and many other absurdities, were just the outgrowths of apartheid – the tumors, rather the cancer itself. And, as we know, cancer can manifest itself in many ways.
Apartheid is the Afrikaans word for what in English is best translated as apart-ness; a policy designed to keep races or ethnic groups from mixing out of fear of racial pollution. Or, as Fenig put it, to prevent them from “threatening [each other’s] separate identity.”
Identity, of course, is a laden concept – Fenig-speak for both racial xenophobia and the power and privileges associated with the superior socio-political position of the dominant race, to which Fenig just happens to belong. 
Like Fenig, the Afrikaners who were so enthusiastic about retribalizing the Zulus, Xhosa and Tswana into bantustans had zero interest in the culture and traditions of those tribes, but enormous interest in ensuring that they could neither challenge nor share in the self-enrichment of the Whites. Sanctimonious concern for the other – “it will be best for them as well” – is classic racism.
The proponents of apartheid liked to describe it as a policy of “separate but equal,” a proposition as preposterous in South Africa then as “democratic and Jewish” is in Israel today. In a power structure in which just one race (or religion or caste) has the monopoly, both equality and democracy are a sham. In apartheid South Africa it meant that, once the races were fully separated, whites would be equal to whites and blacks would be equal to blacks. In Israel it means that a small number of Arab parliamentarians with no chance of ever gaining power are allowed to be a PR window-dressing.
Fenig’s racism – her “systemic vison” of national-ethnic identities – is the real cancer, and it’s metastasizing fast. In South Africa, a similar systemic vision required anti-miscegenation legislation, separate living areas for the different races (known as Group Areas), separate – and highly unequal – education and, of course, separate political institutions, to prevent one race from polluting the other.

Posted in Israel, Race | Comments Off on Haaretz: Book Ban: Israel’s New Mainstreaming of Racial Separation

Life As A Deeply Closeted Orthodox Rabbi

Some Orthodox rabbis are impossible to understand until you realize that they are deeply closeted gay men.

Sure, they might have wives and children, but at heart, they feel a romantic and sexual tug towards males. They may never act on these urges, but their closeted gayness shines through.

Gay men are more effeminate, more emotional, more teary, more precious, more empathic, more nurturing, more dramatic, more explosive, and more sensitive than straight men.

It’s not unknown in Orthodox Judaism for men to be married for more than a decade, to father children, and then to divorce and to declare themselves gay and to continue to live in Orthodox Judaism.

It would not be easy, however, as an Orthodox rabbi with a wife and children and a pulpit, to come out as gay. That happens in the non-Orthodox streams of Judaism, but not in Orthodoxy.

Some of these deeply closeted gay rabbis are a threat to molest kids or to otherwise act out in ways that are deeply destructive to themselves and to others. I expect that they feel very alone in the world and very desolate.

Almost all priests who molest are gay men who molest boys (how often do you hear about priests molesting girls?). Orthodox rabbis who molest boys are also by definition gay or bi.

I am sure that many men who struggle with their homosexual urges turn to religion to try to transcend these unwanted parts of themselves. I expect the efficacy of this varies.

Heterosexuality and homosexuality are a continuum. Acting on these drives depend to an extent depends on circumstance and social norms.

Many of the institutional, theological, and interpersonal conflicts between Orthodox rabbis make more sense when you realize that these fights are between robust heterosexuals on the one hand and those rabbis who are confused (gays, feminists, marxists, pro-Muslim, want to share sovereignty of Jerusalem with Arabs, etc).

Many politicians, journalists and commentators make more sense when you realize that they are deeply closeted gay men. Columnist Michael Barone seems like a deeply closeted gay man who just so happens to enthusiastically support gay marriage as a conservative value.

A couple of deeply closeted gay men (including Jules Zentner at UCLA) helped me through difficult periods of my life when it seemed like everyone else had abandoned me (not true, just a symptom of my depressed thinking). They were attracted to my vulnerability, to my appearing lost and alone in a big world and needing a dad. One hit on me and the other didn’t, but upon realizing that they were gay, I was able to better understand why they always seemed so queer.

Posted in Homosexuality, Rabbis | Comments Off on Life As A Deeply Closeted Orthodox Rabbi

WP: Unhappy in Europe, some Iraqis return home

Comment: The story reports on “refugees” who are unhappy in Europe and decide to go home. It’s interesting in several ways, not least of which is the approach taken by the reporter: She writes sympathetically about the refugees, thus avoiding the wrath of the goodthinkers, while the story itself clearly supports an anti-Narrative POV. I think Steve has pointed out a similar trend at the NYT recently. It’s a new year; I’m optimistic that cracks in the unity of Received Opinion will continue to grow.

As usual at the WaPo, the comments are mostly uncensored and almost 100% on the so-called right wing (really just common sense) side of this issue.

Posted in Europe | Comments Off on WP: Unhappy in Europe, some Iraqis return home

Black Underclass Runs Riot, Elects Donald Trump

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The black underclass has been allowed to run rampant across the nation, because police have all but stopped patrolling black underclass portions of American cities.

It’s only going to get worse as Obama and the Department of Justice start letting out MORE black criminals from the jail.

Remember: Freddie Gray had THREE pending heroin charges when he died, and had recently pleaded down a heroin charge to a mere 100 hours of community service.

My bet for 2016: at some point, all of the six officers indicted in the Freddie Gray murder trial will be acquitted, blacks will riot (with black elected leaders like Marilyn Mosby encouraging the mob violence) and Donald J. Trump will finally give the GET TOUGH ON CRIME speech most of the country has been dying to hear.

* Most of the increase in black homicides in 2015 over 2014, and most black homicides in general, are no good black thugs murdering other no good black thugs. That’s what officials say when they want to dog whistle to white people who are worried about (don’t say) black crime, though one can find plenty of examples of black on white homicides. So, if we’re to take this official story literally, why are we to care about the 15 over 14 delta increase, or the actual high number of black homicides at all?

The answer is that they want us not to care when our caring would hurt the economies and tax rolls of black heavy big cities. Meanwhile, they want us to care and to think it’s the world’s biggest crisis when our caring means they could channel our anger into political energy to get something they want, such as more gun control, more spending programs for big cities, and so on.

* When you see a spike in the black-on-black murder rate, it means black drug dealers are fighting over sales territory. If the territory is worth killing someone for, it means the drug trade is making more money these days. That means idiotic whites are using more drugs. See the rise in heroin/painkiller deaths, etc.

You can always trust blacks to be the sharks in the white population’s gene pool, feeding on the weak, stupid, and self-indulgent.

* Libs hate stop and frisk more than they hate high violent crime rates, or even gun crime.

It’s common sense that S&F is the best way to keep guns out of the hands of violent criminals. Libs love to point the finger away from their own jurisdictions as an excuse for their local crime rates, and for their federal-level gun grabs. They say the next jurisdiction over having “lax” (AKA, Constitutional) gun laws obviates anything they try to do to restrict the proliferation of firearms in high-crime locales. S&F points them out as liars. S&F means they don’t have any excuses. With S&F, it doesn’t matter what the gun laws are nearby, or how much smuggling is going on, because cops are routinely stopping and frisking people and confiscating any illegal firearms they find. A functioning handgun is all but impossible to conceal from even a cursory search, and costs $100 and up. Violent crime prone demographic groups can’t afford to go dropping $100 and up to re-arm after every confiscation in a frequent S&F environment.

Libs probably hate S&F because it works. They don’t want to take handguns from blacks who are using them to bump one another off in epic numbers, they want to take black rifles from whites who are using them to put holes in paper.

* Managing demographics is key. This is how Rudy G. and successive NYC administrations (who were aggressive with career criminals) saved the Big Apple.

Unfortunately, the countless criminals who could no longer do business in NYC had to go somewhere. Thus, NJ municipalities such as Camden, Atlantic City, Asbury Park and Trenton have all declined precipitously in recent decades. Squeeze one side of a water balloon and the liquid magically expands elsewhere.

What NYC did was push countless Big Apple criminals across the river into already black-heavy cities and townships. Today, nearly a dozen once-prosperous New Jersey cities are 1) increasingly black, 2) losing (white) population, 3) black ruled and 4) overwhelmingly Democratic.

These demographic transitions are the hallmark of a predictable urban death spiral.

* “Unwanted party guests” is a significant cause of homicides.

* The entire state of Utah recorded 63 homicides last year.

The number is up from last year, but still small enough that the local press can catalog each one individually, including a synopsis of the circumstances and a photo of each victim:

The total population of Utah is about 2.9 million.

The total population of Chicago is about 2.7 million.

* People who move to DC are chasing power and influence. People who want power are risk-takers, and they get more of a thrill from dancing on the edge of danger than the average person does. This sort of person is also more likely to use recreational drugs. You’ve a got a bunch of overconfident, monied whites in DC who want their kicks. This means the local drug business thrives and makes a ton of cash the more the city gentrifies–if you’re the last black drug dealer left standing. A monopoly is worth fighting for, plus you get all those extra perks if you’re the head of the local cartel and you enjoy hanging out with politicos at all their expensive parties.

* In the past the media could censor the truth and make out that black people were always the victims but with the internet and camera phones – i’d say camera-phones in particular have been the clincher – the truth has managed to break through the media’s wall.

* You wouldn’t want to commit the ultimate sin of Willie Horton campaigning. Of course, 1988 was the last time a GOP Presidential candidate reached 51% of the vote or higher, but it’s better to lose than to run on a popular issue.

* I do think guns are more common among juvenile delinquents than a couple of generations ago. You don’t hear much anymore about knives, like in West Side Story, and you never hear about homemade zip guns, suggesting that quality guns are more affordable today.

* I think blacks are very big on not being “dis-respected” which can be a look, or a word put wrong, and is now dealt with by guns. This is anecdotal I know, but from what I have read, most white guys would just ignore this kind of a*****e behavior (I know I would) and move on. Blacks are ready to kill each other over it.

* Much is made about how camera phones have changed policing in the media. Not surprisingly little is made about how camera phones have open the eyes of many to the behavior of underclass blacks.

Worldstarhiphop has probably done more to fuel the backlash towards the MSM’s spin on race than any conservative media outlet, including Drudge.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Black Underclass Runs Riot, Elects Donald Trump

‘The USA is the ONLY country I have ever been to where immigration does NOT check you out of the country. Why?’

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* A biometric ID for all persons in the United States, citizens and non-citizens alike, is the answer. It would be produced whenever you use a credit card, cash a check, etc.

* Here’s an idea for an immigration reform which is compassionate but has teeth. If you are over 18 and you are discovered to be in the country illegally, your biometric data is taken, and you are given 1 year to wrap up your affairs and leave the country, and if you do so future LEGAL attempts to enter the country will not be prejudiced, you will be forgiven. However, if you are found to be in the USA illegally after the 12 months is up, you must serve 12 months in Federal Prison after which you will be kicked out and prohibited from entering the USA legally for 20 years (only exceptions would be people with foreign diplomatic credentials or who are allowed in on an individual basis by an Act Of Congress).

* I don’t get it. First, I visited the US about ten times under the visa waiver program. Still I had to submit an online request for that including my passport number and a lot of other data. Before entering the country, I was questioned by an immigration officer, and my fingerprints and photograph was taken. So I assume this happenes to anyone entering with a visa as well. The expiration date is known, and you have to produce your passport when checking in for your return flight. So if the airlines submit their passenger lists with passport numbers when the passenger leaves the US, this can be checked against the known and finite list of people who have entered the country and whose visas have not yet expired. If and when an expiry date passes and no record has been submitted by an airline of the person having left the country, the system give a red flag and that person is automatically assumed to have overstayed his/her visa. No biometrical data needed, just a decent database.

Facebook knows when my birthday is, and my friends’ birthdays, and can send me reminders, so why can’t the federal government know when a person’s visa has expired and whether there is a record of that person having left? Seems no more complicated.

I don’t see the need for biometrical data, but if they are capable of taking my data when entering (as they have done a dozen times), why can’t they do so when leaving? I don’t buy the technology argument for one minute.

* Given how incompetent the US government is with border control, how about bringing in some foreign experts – I’m sure Japan, Switzerland and Singapore have some useful ideas.

*

* Really, there is no one better at making the case in hostile environments than Ann Coulter, and she does it with a smile on her face. Virtuosic.

Learned something new there, that Trump asked her for an advanced copy of Adios America after seeing her on Jorge Ramos’s show. She took on all comers there.

* I would apply penalties to the sending countries as well as the overstaying individuals.

That is, assign a non-immigrant visa quota to Brazil, of 1,000,000, for the sake of argument.

If 100,000 people overstay their visas, next year’s quota is 900,000, and the reductions accumulate.

If a Brazilian national commits an act of terrorism here, the visa quota is cut by 50% for ten years.

*

* Foreign born population 1980 v 1990

Latin America 4,372,487 / 8,407,837
Africa 199,723 / 363,819
Europe 5,149,572 / 4,350,403
Asia 2,539,777 / 4,979,037
Canada 853,427 / 753,917

Yes, when Reagan was elected, there were more European immigrants living in the USA than Latin American immigrants.

Hispanic population 1990 v 1980 21,900,089 / 14,603,683

* Don’t want to have problems with visa overstayers or unwanted immigrants, in general? Then don’t invite them into the country. Like the Japanese, allow immigrants that offer a specific service to the country, then see that they leave once that service or contract is fulfilled. The United States has long outlived its need for immigration of any sort – we don’t need Somalis, we don’t need Afghans, we don’t need Iraqis, or Mexicans or Europeans, for that matter.

Once we were a self-sufficient country; we could be that again, but not with the mindset that permeates our upper echelon of government and business and education ‘leaders’. We are an example, the prime example, of capitalism allowed to run amok. I like capitalism, don’t get me wrong, but benevolent capitalism, not arrogant capitalism.

Immigration should be stopped, the mess sorted out, and then allowed again only with the most restrained conditions.

* All of the 9/11 hijacker-terrorists were “visa-overstayers”. They killed over 3,000 Americans.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on ‘The USA is the ONLY country I have ever been to where immigration does NOT check you out of the country. Why?’

NYT: U.S. Doesn’t Know How Many Foreign Visitors Overstay Visas

Comment: I’ve been working US Immigration since the Clinton Era. Since before this law was passed. Hopefully I know what I’m talking about.

Without getting into the specifics of each administration (Because it’s our overall governments fault, not any party in particular) here are the issues.

It’s not about the Visa. Saying they are Visa overstays is a way to confuse the issue.

When someone enters the country, their visa could be valid for several years, or for one day. But the moment they enter into the United States, right there on the border, they are issued a permit. A form we call the I-94. The I-94 gives you your length of stay depending on what sort of a Visa you present. For example, if you present a student visa (F1) then you are admitted for D/S, which stands for Duration of Status. This can be a big problem because it’s difficult to determine when a student is out of status. Sure, it seems simple, but it’s not. And since there is no firm date, it’s their actions that determine when they are out of status. If we can’t keep track of people who stay past their admission date, how do we keep track of students who aren’t acting like students anymore and are therefore “out of status”??

Another example, the most common example, is a visitors visa (B2). When you enter on a visitors visa, you are admitted for 6 months. Even if your visa were to expire tomorrow, you are admitted for 6 months. Even if you plan to leave in 3 days, you are admitted for 6 months. It doesn’t matter what you tell CBP when you enter, whether it’s a week you want to stay or a month or five months, you are given a 6 month admission.

The second most common example is the Visa Waiver. This is someone who comes from a Visa Waiver country (Like the UK) and has a valid issued passport from that country. If you come into the United States from the UK today, you will be given 90 days to visit the United States. Again, doesn’t matter how much time you ask for. If you want a week or if you want several months, you’re given a 90 day stay. The only requirement is that your passport is valid for the entire length of stay (Passport validity is different than visa validity and of course, you don’t even have a visa if you’re getting a Visa Waiver).

There are, of course, many more ways to enter the country legally. Many more visa’s one can enter on, to work, or to perform in a band, or olympics, etc. But these three, students, visitors for pleasure and visa waivers are the most common.

You fix these three things and you fix a lot of our “Visa Overstay” problem.

The student visa thing is a particular bee in my bonnet. We make it way, way, way too easy to become an authorized school for international students. As a result, we have schools in this country, located in strip malls, with 2 employees, that take in 1500 students a year. Students who live in New York, or the south, and the school is located in Los Angeles.

The F1 student program is a huge mess. Someone comes into government and cleans that program up and you’d go a long way to getting rid of visa overstays.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on NYT: U.S. Doesn’t Know How Many Foreign Visitors Overstay Visas