Luke Ford

Will the Coalition of the Fringe become unhinged when they realize how much they hate each other?

From Breitbart:

The Black Lives Matter platform introduced on Monday includes a plank that accuses Israel of “genocide … against the Palestinian people.”
The movement, which featured prominently at the Democratic National Convention last week, links Israel to ” interlinked systems of white supremacy, imperialism, capitalism and patriarchy.”

The platform states, as “fact,” the accusation that Israel is an “apartheid state,” alongside other claims:

Israel is an apartheid state with over 50 laws on the books that sanction discrimination against the Palestinian people [sic]. Palestinian homes and land are routinely bulldozed to make way for illegal Israeli settlements [sic]. Israeli soldiers also regularly arrest and detain Palestinians as young as 4 years old without due process [sic]. Everyday, Palestinians are forced to walk through military checkpoints along the US-funded apartheid wall [sic].

None of the accusations above is backed up with evidence, and none is true. The statement also omits any mention of terror, which claimed hundreds of innocent Israeli lives each year until Israel built a security barrier along and within much of the West Bank.

The Black Lives Matter platform calls for cutting off aid to Israel, along with cutting U.S. military spending by 50%, so that the funds can be re-directed to “universal health care, full employment, housing for all, free quality public education at all levels, etc.”

To achieve that goal, the platform advocates “divestment campaigns” on the federal level; fighting state legislation against the anti-Israel “boycott, divestment, sanctions” (BDS) movement; and holding “direct actions of solidarity” at the local level to promote opposition to Israel.

Jewish community groups have already begun to denounce the Black Lives Matter platform. The Jewish Community Relations Council of Boston, for example, has announced that it “cannot and will not align ourselves with organizations that falsely and maliciously assert that Israel is committing ‘genocide.’ … We remind our community that the posture on Israel expressed in this platform does not reflect or represent the views of many in the African-American community …”.

It makes sense to me that blacks would find more in common with Palestinians than with Jews. American blacks and Palestinians have average IQs in the 85 range. They both love conspiracy theories. They prefer to blame outsiders for their problems.

Brett Stevens writes Nov. 2, 2015:

Israel Restores Nationalism

As I have mentioned before (at least eight years before), Israel will lead the way in restoring Nationalism, which is a world order where boundaries are defined by the simultaneous shared ethnicity, culture, and values of a population.

Now to the dismay of liberals everywhere, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has formalized that statement. In a brilliant act of statecraft that flew over the heads of mainstream media, Netanyahu both re-legalized the defense of an indigenous ethnic majority by a state, and announced his plans for Palestine:

Mr. Netanyahu said in a speech to the Zionist Congress on Tuesday night that “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews.” The prime minister said that the mufti, Haj Amin al-Husseini, had protested to Hitler that “they’ll all come here,” referring to Palestine. 

“So what should I do with them?” Mr. Netanyahu quoted Hitler as asking Mr. Husseini. “He said, ‘Burn them.'”

While Holocaust historians and revisionists — neither of whom have a good record of getting the truth right the first time — will debate this into the ground, Netanyahu’s statement was subtle and profound. He looked carefully at the camera as he spoke the words clearly and strongly, aware that he was making history — even if the rest of the media and pundits have not caught on. Here are the implications of what he said:

(1) If you merely want to expel a foreign population, that is not really a bad thing, if you are doing it to defend your own people.

(2) Nationalism is necessary. It was necessary for Germany, and now it is necessary for Israel. It is the only way to preserve a native population.

(3) Palestine has been the darling of Europe both in the 1930s and in the present day, and both times have led to disastrous results.

The American media missed all of these implications in their desire to fight the last World War over again, mainly because it allows them to dog whistle the civil rights conformity signal to their audience, which unites them in a buzzing hive-mind.

Germany, in accordance with the ways of democracy, which is essentially a popularity contest, tried to take the lead in the narrative by immediately embarking on a guilt-drenched retrospective. Europeans have long known that there is no such thing as bad publicity and so a public self-flagellation gains power more than a denial. In democracy, it’s important to stay in the spotlight by any means necessary…

Netanyahu realizes that Europe today, Israel today, Germany in the 1930s, and Israel in Biblical times share a problem: being small, higher-IQ and thus wealthier societies beset by vast hordes of angry, low-IQ, and impoverished third world people. The Palestinians, who are essentially the Mexican indios of the Middle East, consistently outbreed Jews and are using the womb as a strategy for conquest of Israel through the power of democracy. No sane politician — no leader — would allow that to happen to his people.

Israel needs the right to do what it was formed to do, which was to protect the Jewish people against not just Nazi-inspired murders — most of which happened in advance of the actual Nazis arriving — but the numerous pogroms that saw the Jewish people ejected from every country in Europe and the Middle East as well as some in Asia. This requires Nationalism, which is the exact same political system which was demonized in the wake of WWII.

Comments:

* Israel offers up a really good blueprint for us to follow in the West. No, it’s not entirely the same. Jews are different people than us. Still, they have created a sort of “Archeo-Futurist” template that we should study. Whatever you want to say about him, Bibi is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

* Israeli-style nationalism (indigenist ethnarchism) is a rough blueprint that is incredibly viable for many European and Asian countries, and many of the values present (revival of ancient culture, fierce anti-colonialism) would be highly beneficial to white countries in their current states.

* Whatever you want to say about him, Idi Amin is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

Whatever you want to say about him, Robert Mugabe is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

Whatever you want to say about him, Nelson Mandela is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

* Pray tell, what “hordes of angry, low-IQ, and impoverished third world people” were ‘besetting’ Germany in the 1930’s? Ashkenazi Jews? Um, news flash – the Ashkenazim outperform Germans on IQ tests (read books like “The Bell Curve” by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray plus “IQ and Global Inequality” by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen for proof).

You cannot compare what’s happening to Europe today (Germany included) with what happened to Germany in the 1930’s, though I know you’ll never stop trying. National Socialism was NOT nationalism! Rather, it was super-nationalism that masked itself as nationalism to woo over the German electorate. I seriously doubt the war-weary Germans of 1933 would have voted for the Nazis had they known about Hitler’s territorial ambitions in Eastern Europe. Hitler knew this as well, which is why he was quick to impose totalitarian rule shortly after he came to power.

I was involved in the White Nationalist movement years ago, until I got a belly full of it and left. I’ve yet to meet a WN (of Northern European extraction) who at heart isn’t a Nazi or Nazi sympathizer. Most of them also seem to think Adolf Hitler was the Second Coming. These idiots would then wonder why almost no one wanted to have anything to do with them.

Adolf Hitler, in addition to being a genocidal and democidal sociopath, single-handedly wrecked both European ethno-nationalist movements and the Eugenics movement. For that he can burn in Hell, and so can anyone who kisses his coat tails. You WN’s will just never get it. You’ll never go anywhere until you get over this love affair you have with a failed tyrant.

* The majority in the WN movement are aware that Hitler was not a White nationalist. he was a German nationalist and that he waged aggressive territorial German ethno-chauvanism which lead to the deaths of millions of White people. He didn’t know when to stop.
On the other hand one doesn’t have to be a full blow Hitlerist to be demonised as a “racist, fascist, bigoted, White supremacist, hate mongering Nazi.” You just have to be a White identitarian who believes we have the right to our own homelands and to live amongst our own kind and are under no moral obligation to hand over our lands, heritage and identities to competing alien peoples and cultures. So our enemies, the anti-Whites have evolved a kind of heads they win, tails we lose, Catch22, closed loop argument. The dice are loaded, the game is rigged and the fight is fixed.

* The crisis of 30s Germany had more to do with economic collapse and socialist agitation than it did with foreign invasion. Frankly, I’m not sure the German people ever really accepted Nazism. Hitler got into power more by parliamentary maneuvering than by popular acclaim. He stayed in power by offering a semblance of order and revenge for the defeat of WWI, which was what Germans really wanted. Everything else was peripheral.

* An interesting article, but one that avoids the inconvenient facts of leftist and jewish strategic goals. Both are presently winning the war to destroy the White race and European culture, even if they sit back and do nothing more the biological momentum is such that we will be overwhelmed within 20 years. The only way for us to survive is to somehow, probably an impossibility, achieve political power and start the process of massive repatriation and resettlement. No half measures will be tolerated, the bleeding hearts and the churches can squark all they like.
If Netanyahu wants to tell the world about his nationalist program, fine, we wish him well, but can anyone honestly believe the beltway elites are going to follow his lead! The elites circles in politics, business, and academia wouldn’t piss on ordinary White people if we were on fire. The noble burden has fallen on our shoulders, let’s clean up this mess our way, ourselves alone.

* Hungary is leading the restoration of nationalism within European Christian civilization, as Kevin MacDonald correctly predicted, while Israel, through its AIPAC henchmen in the USA such as Paul Singer, Sheldon Adelson, Haim Shaban etc. and their puppets, caused the refugee crisis by destroying Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen (and Iran and Russia next?), which in turn provided a pretext for an invasion of welfare-seeking economic migrants – and all these gung-ho, Israel supporting war mongers in the Jewish diaspora are also the biggest supporters of open borders for White countries.

Netanyahu’s remark may help slow down the current surge of migrant invasion, by making the Germans feel a little less guilty and a little more wary of Muslim immigrants. Very well, this particular remark was good for Whites, but is there any evidence that Netanyahu sees us as anything other than cattle to be bilked of our blood and treasure for the good of the Jews, to be preserved only to the extent necessary to serve Jewish interests? If not, why has he never called off the dogs and told his powerful admirers in the diaspora to stop supporting open borders and stop supporting wars which, while providing slight benefits to Israel, cause immense damage to Middle Eastern Christians and to European peoples?

I say we should take Brett Steven’s advice and expel, if not from our nations then at least from our pro-White publications and organizations, those Jews whose only contribution seems to be incessant attempts to distract attention from, and make excuses for, the anti-White malice of diaspora Jewish elites.

If they were truly on our side they would use their Jewish privilege to undertake direct actions which, while necessary, would be counter-productive if undertaken by White men. Every people needs to take out its own trash. Von Stauffenberg understood this.

Brett Stevens writes Aug. 4, 2014:

Israel withdrew its troops from Gaza last night, but the problems that brought them there remain. Two populations find themselves locked in a conflict with no end. Many people think this is a clash between different religions, but the roots lie deeper.

Many Western liberals see a group of poor people confronting relatively wealthy people, and using the logic of the French Revolution, assume that the rich oppress the poor. They accuse the victims of genocide during the Second World War of committing genocide when they defend themselves from poorer, browner Third-World people.

That view ignores historical fact. Both groups have had a chance to develop within the same territory. Israelis followed the European model and created a society of learning, technology, arts and culture. Palestinians remain a Third World people, and now that they have been displaced by Zionism, have added religious fanaticism to their traditional social organization. Across the Muslim world, religion tends to be more extreme and to guide collective action, whereas in the First World it is largely a personal moral imperative.

Some argue that societies are made of laws and that anyone may come, learn the laws, and become equally valuable citizens. History teaches otherwise. Third World populations bring with them not only their own habits and folkways, but ingrained tendencies and limitations that clash with the standards of the First World.

If the Third World lacks what the First World has, why haven’t Third-Worlders simply copied the successful methods of the First World? Why have they continued to act in ways that produce Third World conditions? It is because genetic differences constrain their choices.

Our dilemma in the United States is like that of Israel. The American remnant, a First World population, faces waves of Third World people claiming the right to live among us. They cannot adopt First World standards but will, if admitted in large numbers, reproduce the Third World, effectively destroying the First World nation that is their host. What had been a civilization becomes a warlord-dominated, individualistic/emotional, corrupt and disordered society. Most advanced nations face the same choice Israel does, but instead of fighting back, allow the Third World to pour across their borders.

Evolution rewards excellence and self-preservation. We in the West have achieved excellence but are failing at self-preservation. We may fool ourselves for a time by thinking that the differences in populations are merely religious or political. In fact, we are being assimilated by the parts of humanity that did not succeed, and they will destroy what we have and replace it with what they have.

There’s nothing in the Jewish tradition about an obligation to look after blacks just as there is nothing in the black tradition about an obligation to the Jewish state. Organized Jewry supported black civil rights, not because it had anything to do with Judaism, but because it was strategically useful in empowering the Coalition of the Fringe against the white Christian core.

From the Forward:

Although the platform itself is not at all about Israel or the Jewish people, it is ironic, but understandable, that the Movement for Black Lives seeks to distance itself from the Jewish state. As Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote in 2008, “the Zionist idea is almost the exact opposite of the integrationist idea which dominates black political thought. Indeed, Zionism’s natural corollary isn’t the civil rights movement, it’s the very black power movement which Martin Luther King and his followers rejected.”

Since 2008, much has changed. The new fight for civil rights looks nothing like its 1960s counterpart. It has become much less integrationist and much more focused on black power and empowerment. I have often wondered why we have seen no modern day Rabbi Heschels marching arm in arm with the modern day Martin Luther King Jrs. It is not because the Movement for Black Lives does not have support and allies among Jewish groups. It is because the Movement for Black Lives is not asking anyone to understand what it means to be black. It is demanding that white society acknowledge that we have never, can never, will never understand. Martin Luther King Jr. is dead, and white America killed him.

The American Dream has also become the Jewish Dream. After all, as Coates writes, before Ashkenazi Jews were white, we were Jewish. Though it hasn’t always been this way, American Jews are the wealthiest, best educated, most assimilated group of Americans. How could we white Jews possibly hope to understand what it’s like to be black in America?

The Movement for Black Lives and their chosen alliances represent a radically different attempt at creating American black power. Instead of looking for powerful allies, they’ve chosen to align with Palestinian nationalists. Instead of asking to be fully integrated into existing white America, they’re demanding deep structural changes to the U.S. healthcare, education, military and criminal justice systems as we know them.