You Could Say The Same For Auschwitz

“Sweeping its horrific history of displacement, racism, and class warfare under the rug for a second, Elysian Park is a pretty chill spot.” (Vice)

Posted in Los Angeles | Comments Off on You Could Say The Same For Auschwitz

A Google news search reveals that rabbis and Jewish groups have stopped calling for America to bring in Syrian Muslim refugees. Why the change?

Perhaps widespread revulsion at the Cologne NYE groping by Muslim immigrants was a factor? Maybe there never was a Jewish imperative for Western countries to take in more Muslims who are likely to hate it?

3063DD0400000578-3408905-image-m-35_1453321434717

Unhappy homos at Trump-Palin rally.

download

Notice anything about the physiognomy of people who despise Donald Trump? I can usually tell someone’s politics just by looking at them. Softies lean left and on their emotions. Hardies lean right.

Posted in Immigration, Jews | Comments Off on A Google news search reveals that rabbis and Jewish groups have stopped calling for America to bring in Syrian Muslim refugees. Why the change?

Like David Bowie, I use racism to fight racism. If you ever took Luke Ford for what was on the surface, you were missing something.

Adam Parfrey writes: “Luke Ford’s racism is always revelatory. Thank you, Luke, for all of it.”

Washington Post:

Was David Bowie’s 1983 hit “China Girl” racist?

Yes.

But racist on purpose.

If you’re wondering why that makes a difference, consider Bowie’s comments in Rolling Stone that same year: “Let’s try to use the video format as a platform for some kind of social observation, and not just waste it on trotting out and trying to enhance the public image of the singer involved. I mean, these are little movies, and some movies can have a point, so why not try to make some point.”

At the time, the “China Girl” video was a marvel. It depicted the gender bending Bowie as a hypermasculine protagonist in a lush, interracial romance. It was also rife with stereotypes. The lyrics indicated a desire to conquer — and offered a threat of racial violence.

I stumble into town just like a sacred cow
Visions of swastikas in my head
Plans for everyone
It’s in the white of my eyes

My little China girl
You shouldn’t mess with me
I’ll ruin everything you are
I’ll give you television
I’ll give you eyes of blue
I’ll give you man who wants to rule the world

Bowie’s new fans — those who flocked to him after the success of the 1983 “Let’s Dance” album — may have thought they were getting a salacious pop single served up with a taste of Asia, but older fans from the ’70s knew better: Bowie was donning the role of a racist womanizer not only to decry racist womanizing but to condemn the West’s demeaning view of the East as a whole. “China Girl” was a parody of racism and stereotyping.

“The message that they have is very simple,” Bowie said. “It’s wrong to be a racist!”

“If you ever took Bowie for what was on the surface, you were missing something,” said Tiffany Naiman, whose work on Bowie was published in “David Bowie: Critical Perspectives.” “I think he was well aware of his elite cosmopolitanism. He was able to move through different cultures because of his privilege but he understood otherness and wanted to highlight that.”

Posted in Asians, China, Personal | Comments Off on Like David Bowie, I use racism to fight racism. If you ever took Luke Ford for what was on the surface, you were missing something.

What Draws Some Jewish Voters to Donald Trump? His ‘Chutzpah.’

Organized Jewry hates Donald Trump and will do anything they can to stop him. Regular Jews like the guy.

Is Donald Trump’s chutzpah kinda Jewish? Does he come across more Jewish or more WASPy or more black?

Nathan Guttman writes for the Forward:

“A mensch with chutzpah.”
These were the yiddishisms that Republican Jewish Coalition board member Abbie Friedman deployed when he introduced Donald Trump at the group’s candidates forum last December. It was, in part, an effort to ease the palpable discomfort of wealthy RJC donors with the brash billionaire who would be president.
The problem, though, is that for many Jewish Republican voters, the New York billionaire’s ratio of chutzpah to mensch leans too heavily to the former, leading them to throw their support behind other, more conventional contenders. Still, the GOP front-runner, now preparing for the official kickoff of primary season, has succeeded in charming some Jewish voters with his outsized personality and trademark bluntness.

Jewish Trump supporters have their own Facebook page, a Twitter account and even a rabbi. One rabbi. Many of these supporters and sympathizers seem to be drawn to the candidate more for his swagger and his image of business success than for what he is saying and proposing to do if elected president. Most important, they relish the prospect that he will bring this spirit to the presidential race to ensure that the Democrats don’t win another four years in the White House.
“I’m a NFH — Not for Hillary,” said Joan Rubin, a Jewish Chicago native who spends her winters in Florida. “I don’t know who will win the nomination, but I will definitely vote for Donald Trump if he’s nominated. We can’t have what happened in the past seven years continue.”

Almost across-the-board, mainstream national Jewish groups have denounced Trump for his call to indefinitely ban entry of all Muslims to America, and his suggestion that authorities should close mosques judged to be extremist. They view Trump’s move as an affront to American Jewry’s own history, which included the government’s exclusion of their European brethren when they sought to flee Nazism. But even before Trump’s Islamophobic comments, his soaring popularity in pre-primary polls raised concern within the Republican Jewish establishment, which has traditionally sought to back candidates closer to the political center.

Trump backers generally tend to be less educated and to earn less than average Republicans, while American Jews, in general, fall into neither of these categories.

Some Jewish supporters of Trump still feel uneasy identifying publicly as being in the Donald camp. “I don’t need people asking questions,” said a Florida Jewish resident who strongly supports Trump but asked not to be named. She argued that the media has distorted Trump’s message and therefore expressing public support for him is considered socially unacceptable in her circles. She expressed full support for Trump’s call to ban Muslim entry to America, arguing that Muslim immigrants have shown no willingness to assimilate into society and that the local Muslim community has not sufficiently condemned terrorist attacks carried out by violent Islamists. “Trump’s the only one forcing the press to report things they don’t want to report,” she said.

But not everyone is embarrassed about going on the record. Trump recently got an unexpected endorsement from the legendary Jewish comedian Jerry Lewis. “I think he’s great,” Lewis said in an interview with Raymond Arroyo on “The World Over.” “He’s a showman, and we’ve never had a showman in the president’s chair,” the octogenarian comic explained.

Jewish backers of Trump interviewed by the Forward sought to distinguish between the outspoken candidate’s achievement-driven personality, which they find attractive, and some of his positions, especially those relating to women and ethnic minorities, which they find unappealing.

“In the beginning I was very, very excited with Donald Trump. I admire his business ability and I think he is an amazing man,” Rubin said. “But I was shocked by some of the things he said.” But these comments did not make Trump any less of a legitimate candidate in Rubin’s eyes. She initially thought that Chris Christie would poll more strongly and that Jeb Bush (“He’s so nebbish, I can’t believe it”) would be a top-tier candidate. Trump, now in the lead, is just as good for Jewish voters, she said, as long as he defeats Hillary Clinton.

Some GOP candidates, mainly Bush, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, have already built bridges to the Jewish community, cultivating donors and arranging meetings with community leaders.

In contrast, in his RJC address, Trump voiced doubt about Israel’s commitment to achieving peace with the Palestinians and was booed after he refused to say whether Jerusalem should serve as the undivided capital of Israel, a priority for many in America’s pro-Israel lobby.

“Do me a favor, just relax,” he told one of the people booing, in a trademark display of his accent on the chutzpah side of the ledger.

Trump also seemed to suggest that the wealthy Jewish donors in front of him sought to put a puppet in the White House. “You’re not going to support me even though you know I’m the best thing that could happen to Israel,” Trump said. “I know why you’re not going to support me — because I don’t want your money. You want to control your own politician.”

This approach has done little to build more bridges for Trump into the Jewish world. But one Trump enthusiast, Rabbi Bernhard Rosenberg of Edison, New Jersey, tried to change this reality, setting up a “Rabbis for Trump” Facebook group, only to learn he was the sole rabbi in the group. Rosenberg changed the name to the singular form, and now he runs the “Rabbi for Trump” page.

“Cruz already had his following of rabbis, and I didn’t see a lot of effort with regard to Trump,” Rosenberg told the Forward. “Politically, it’s not right to put all your eggs in one basket.”

Rosenberg, who is rabbi emeritus of Congregation Beth El in Edison, chose Trump because of his “personality, character and vigor to make change in this country.” He dismissed Trump’s use of offensive language toward women, Mexican immigrants and even to Jewish listeners as “his sense of humor,” which is “part of his personality.” If Trump gets elected, Rosenberg added, he’ll have to “tone it down a bit.”

As for Trump’s call to ban entry of Muslims to America, Rosenberg thinks it “didn’t come out correctly.” But he agrees with the need to halt absorption of refugees “until we know exactly what’s going on with the Muslim community coming from outside.”

For other Jewish backers of Trump, the call to ban Muslims was a breaking point.

Jeremy Leyden, a journalist and international media consultant, was drawn to Trump’s success story. “The man is successful; he knows business, knows how to negotiate and has a daughter who is an Orthodox Jew. I put it together, and it sounds very good,” said Leyden, who divides his time between the United States and Israel. “His personality is very Israeli,” Leyden observed. “He’s very confident, just like Israelis are, and you need to be confident in the Middle East. If you’re not, they’ll treat you like a rag.”

Leyden used his digital marketing expertise to set up a Trump outreach campaign in New Hampshire with its own Facebook page. Separately, he also launched a “Jews 4 Trump” Facebook page and a Twitter account.
“Then he comes up with this proposed ban on Muslims,” Leyden said of Trump’s December 7 statement. “That really turned me off big time.”
Leyden asked the campaign for clarifications, and when those weren’t sufficient he raised his concerns on the New Hampshire Facebook page he had created, only to have the Trump campaign try to shut down the page. Leyden said he is now “moving away” from the Trump campaign and looking toward Cruz as his candidate. But the “Jews 4 Trump” page will remain active in the hope that the candidate will change his views on banning Muslims from entering the United States and state that he supports the unity of Jerusalem.
“There were many Jews who were initially turned off by Trump’s bombastic nature, and others were turned on by it but later became turned off because of the ban on Muslims,” he said.
Jonathan Gould, a New York entrepreneur, expressed the dilemma facing voters who see value in Trump’s anti-establishment posture while rejecting his policy on many other issues.
“I feel Donald Trump’s anti-Washington stance is worth continuing to hear even when it’s contrary to core Jewish values along the way,” he said. “Our country’s suffering from the lack of an effective government assaults my Jewish sensibilities.”

Posted in America, Donald Trump | Comments Off on What Draws Some Jewish Voters to Donald Trump? His ‘Chutzpah.’

Jewish Football

Listening to a Jewish lawyer talk about how he has his opponent boxed in, all receivers covered, that the quarterback has to run and how he has really big lineman chasing him, makes me realize that the practice of law plays the same role for Jews that football plays for goyim. It’s a way to legally express your aggression.

Watching your average Jew trying to play football is like watching your average goy trying to play lawyer. Yes, I know there are great goyisha lawyers and great Jewish football players. I’m talking stereotypes here.

Posted in Football, Jews | Comments Off on Jewish Football

The Cologne rapes and our culture of denial

Dennis Prager writes:

The men in Cologne lacked the value system and the self-control that we (mistakenly) take for granted in the West.
Which brings us to the second important aspect of the Cologne attacks that is widely denied: moral differences between cultures.
Hundreds of German women haven’t been sexually assaulted at previous New Year’s celebrations in Cologne. The reason is that hundreds of German men don’t gather to do this. Why? Because they are the beneficiaries of centuries of Western Judeo-Christian and secular values relating to sexual conduct. The attackers — nearly all of whom are believed to be immigrants from Muslim countries — are not the beneficiaries of those value systems.
Of course, not all Muslim men feel free to attack women, but many do — especially among those coming from Arab countries, and some non-Arab countries such as Pakistan, Afghanistan and Somalia.
Thus, there have been many incidents of rape by Muslim immigrants in the United Kingdom, Sweden and elsewhere in Europe, in addition to Germany. Only the silence of European media and politicians has prevented this from becoming a widely known European moral scandal.
In Sweden, rape was exceedingly rare until large numbers of Muslim immigrants arrived. As early as 1996, a Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention report revealed that Muslim immigrants from North Africa were 23 times more likely to commit rape than Swedish men. Yet when a Muslim commits a rape, the media refer to him only as Swedish.
According to a BBC report, the number of rapes in Sweden tripled between 2003 and 2010. According to Swedish writer Ingrid Carlqvist, “Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the formerly homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 1,472%.”
This month, the BBC reported: “Last year, there were numerous sexual assaults at a music festival in Stockholm — many by migrant youths — but police did not make the information public. They have now admitted that keeping silent was ‘a big mistake.’ ”
In Rotherham, England, at least 1,400 girls from as young as 11 years old were gang raped from 1997 to 2013 by gangs of mostly Pakistani male immigrants. But the police and government officials did nothing and covered it up because of fears of being called Islamophobic.
In Denmark, the state’s official statistical office, Statistics Denmark, revealed that in 2010, more than half of convicted rapists had an immigrant background. Readers will also recall the gang rape and sexual assault of CBS reporter Lara Logan by at least 200 Egyptian men in Cairo’s Tahrir Square in 2011.
And none of this touches on the instances of individual and gang rape of young Muslim women in Europe. But since these immigrants’ cultures usually hold women responsible for their own rapes, far fewer Muslim women report being raped.
The same ideology that denies male-female differences denies cultural moral differences. I won’t name it. Try to guess.

Posted in Germany, Immigration, Islam, Rape | Comments Off on The Cologne rapes and our culture of denial

Jewish School Offers Fake Report Cards To Those Who Want To Raise Their Kids’ Self-Esteem

0d8be4de6a47e9fe_CYxtbwZWMAARg-9.xxxlarge

It is wonderful to see Jewish schools leading the way!

I fear this news will be used by anti-Semites to propulgate the slander that Jews tend to be less than 100% honest.

Chaim Amalek writes: “If it helps little Menachem grow up to become a man who can compete against the silly goyim and their diversity, I am all for it.”

Popsugar reports:

When Yeshiva Ketana, a Jewish school in Inwood, NY, sent out this report card in early January, a surprising sentence concluded the letter….

“Since our goal is to share accurate information with the parents, and not to discourage or hurt a student, great discretion must be used before allowing your child to view his report card. Certainly, report cards should not be seen by students without parental permission and guidance. If after reviewing the enclosed report card, you would like us to develop a second version of this report card for your son with higher grades, please call…”

REPORT: Some people, not surprisingly, are outraged or at the very least scratching their heads over this concept. One Twitter user wrote, “This is a disgrace!! The coddling of kids has got to stop. There is no accountability anymore. Sad.”

While it’s always encouraging to hear that all schools don’t blindly follow what seems to almost be a nationwide curriculum and standard, giving kids the opportunity to “do over” their grades seems like it has the potential to backfire. Of course, we all want our children to know they do have the chance to right their wrongs and to make better choices next time, but… why not just wait until next time? Wouldn’t the lesson sink in better that way?

Giving kids the immediate opportunity for higher grades strips so much accountability away from children. Most of us know what it’s like to have brought home a poor test score or a not-so-great report card — it isn’t fun. But hopefully, in a lot of cases, that in and of itself was the motivation we needed to try harder, go for extra credit or ask more questions during the lesson. If students know their report card grades aren’t final, will they do that? Why would they?

Of course, it’s unclear what “developing a second version of the report card” entails, but still, it seems like said second version would be best the following semester and due to the student’s hard work.

Education certainly isn’t one size fits all. What clicks instantly for some kids is a flat-out enigma to others. Schools shouldn’t treat all kids the same. And a little coddling is good with young children. But report card do-overs seem like they’ll do more harm than good. Unless, of course, teaching kids that there’s always a way out is a good thing.

Posted in Cheating, Yeshiva | Comments Off on Jewish School Offers Fake Report Cards To Those Who Want To Raise Their Kids’ Self-Esteem

Marco Rubio Saw Nothing!

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Marco Rubio is not one who can, right now at least, claim ignorance of Cuban immigrant cocaine money. Working for his major cocaine trafficker brother-in-law was literally his first job! But he does claim to have not noticed anything unusual until the day bro in law was arrested.

About the drug ring where Orlando Cicilia was the #2 man:

What began as a marijuana-import operation in the late 1970s had blossomed into the far more lucrative business of distributing kilos of cocaine smuggled into South Florida from Colombia. During operation from 1976 to 1986, the ring moved half-a-million pounds of marijuana and 200 pounds of cocaine worth an estimated $75 million.

“It was a very large operation,” said Delbert Woodburn, a Miami-Dade narcotics detective who investigated Tabraue in the late 1970s and early 1980s. “Planes from Colombia were coming into the Bahamas and the Keys, landing at small airports, dropping drugs into the Everglades.”

Once Cicilia joined, he became the “front man,” insulating Tabraue by handing over drugs to buyers and coordinating shipments around the country, according to interviews, DEA field reports and grand jury testimony obtained by The Washington Post.

As the business flourished, Cicilia took on the appearance of the quintessential Miami underworld hotshot, donning sunglasses and wearing his paisley suit sleeves rolled up.

$75 million in the 80′s is like $200 million now. But Marco, who I am sure never even saw Scarface or Miami Vice, had NO CLUE that a family member he saw everyday was involved with drugs.

“Mario was the kingpin, and Orlando was his second in command,” said Michael Fisten, a homicide detective who worked on the case and is writing a book about it. “He always had large amounts of cash on him.”

No clue whatsoever, there are many ways that a recent Cuban immigrant in 80′s Miami could “always have large amounts of cash on him.”

The couple also agreed to pay Rubio $10 a week for each of their seven Samoyed dogs he washed. He made enough to buy tickets for all eight Dolphins regular-season home games, Rubio wrote.

That same house where Rubio earned his football-ticket money would soon be under surveillance by federal agents. ….

Detectives had noticed a man behind the wheel of a Chevy Blazer that was appearing frequently among the stream of Ferraris, Maseratis and Jaguars that flowed to and from the kingpin’s pet store.

No way young Marco could even have suspected, in 80′s Miami, that a “stream of Ferraris, Maseratis and Jaguars” coming from a Cuban immigrant who wore his “paisley suit sleeves rolled up” could ever be involved with anything illegal.

* To be fair, “preternaturally alert, perceptive, and suspicious” is not an impression that Rubio ever gives of himself.

* “He made enough to buy tickets for all eight Dolphins regular-season home games, Rubio wrote.”

That’s wasn’t as hideously expensive as it is today, but yeah, that was still a lot of money back in the 1980s for a high school student.

Rubio’s brother-in-law was arrested when he was 16, so I’m not going to personally hold him morally accountable. But, still, the idea that Rubio deserves to be President because he’s ethnically Hispanic is a little bizarre since that’s the ethnic background — Miami Vice — he’s from, and he ought to be a little embarrassed about being from Scarfaceville.

In contrast, Jeb Bush was 27 when he chose to move from Caracas to Miami in late 1980 to make his fortune. Venezuela wasn’t Colombia, but still … Jeb must have had a clue what was going on. I’m sure he didn’t get directly involved in the Big C in Miami, but he clearly benefited from the cocaine trade pouring money into Miami. As a banker for Texas Commerce Bank I’m sure he could have arranged to have moved to a town with a lot of Spanish speakers for the benefit of his wife that was more respectable, more sedate, more militaryish, such as San Antonio or El Paso or San Diego or somewhere on the West Coast of Florida, such as Tampa.

But Jeb chose Miami in 1980. I spent a week in the Cape Canaveral area of Florida in July 1980 and it seemed pretty coked-up. And that was visiting the family of a guy with a Ph.D. in electrical engineering. That’s probably the nerdiest part of Florida, and still every bar was blasting “Cocaine” by Eric Clapton.

I’m sure Trump has dealt with a lot of “private sanitation” guys who were obviously mobbed up, but that’s the environment he was born into. I understand that Jeb felt like his older brother George W. had Texas (either Houston or Dallas?) locked up, but that still left him a variety of choices besides Miami.

Posted in Cuba, Florida, Immigration | Comments Off on Marco Rubio Saw Nothing!

Finding Out Sarah Palin Endorsed Donald Trump

12376419_10153898692091255_88136263965446543_n

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Finding Out Sarah Palin Endorsed Donald Trump

Charles Darwin’s Pros And Cons Of Marriage

From the Chateau:

Charles Darwin – yes, that guy – once drew up a pro and con list for getting married. His list is reprinted here, in readable format.

darwinmarrynot

The standard Chateau view of marriage is that it is a raw deal for individual American men, as currently constituted, (it wasn’t always thus). However, there are good reasons for monogamous, heterosexual marriage to continue as a cultural norm and societal buttress. Ol’ Charlie hit on a number of the pros. It’s really not a good idea to have children outside of marriage, particularly over the long term (single mommyhood erodes civilizational capital). Over the short term, it’s still a bad idea unless you belong to one of the few human races in the world (think: Swedes) who can handle having children within an unmarried, cohabitational context. (The verdict is out on how sustainable the Swedish method is, considering how quickly their evolved suite of mental characteristics compels them to hand their country over to the kebab crush.)

…Most men aren’t keen about keeping themselves in good graces with relatives; women have much more affinity for nurturing family ties. It is absolutely true that wives, and to a lesser extent husbands, get fat and lazy after marriage. A wife and family are a responsibility that will cut into a man’s free time, (many men are ok with trading in their free time for the comforts of domestication). Less money? Sure. (Don’t be fooled by the lure of a double income. Wives – and long-time cohabitating girlfriends – will just spend twice as fast and twice as much what they spent when they were single.)

Darwin was very concerned about an increase in his “anxiety” from marriage, as he wrote it twice. Potential marital money problems vexed him, too. The provider beta was a real catch in Darwin’s day that isn’t as true today. Women didn’t HATE HATE HATE betas back then with the same bubbling spite. But the ability of a provider beta in the Darwin era to leverage his provisioning skill for prime poon meant that he couldn’t slack off and give his date a bag of Skittles for her birthday, and recline smugly knowing a blowjob was coming his way regardless. Jerkboy Game in Darwin’s time probably had more limited appeal to women than it does today.

Posted in Marriage | Comments Off on Charles Darwin’s Pros And Cons Of Marriage