Luke Ford

Charles Johnson writes:

GotNews.com has been observing Commentary Magazine John Podhoretz’s descent into Jew policing and madness for quite some time now. But the person who has been really accelerating it is Donald Trump.

Yes, Trump, the father of two Jewish-(ish) daughters, is supposedly a closet anti-Semite! And the Jews that support him (or at least try to understand him and his supporters) aren’t real Jews, of course. His Jewish Catholic campaign manager Corey Lewandowski and his Jewish policy advisor Steve Miller must not understand what Podhoretz understands about the man they worked for.

Lately, though, Podhoretz has gone on a tear accusing anyone and everyone of being insufficiently Jewish or anti-Semitic.

Podhoretz incredibly accused fellow Jew Mytheos Holt of not being Jewish on Twitter after Holt wrote an article about the rise of Trump and his voters.

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

OK,kid, I have no idea what you're saying here and neither do you, so go back to winning over white nationalists now https://t.co/CO1bKqMluu

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) April 1, 2016

Is Mytheos Holt a Jew?

GotNews.com went looking and emailed Mytheos’s aunt and mother. And, lo and behold, his Auntie Jo and his very Jewish mother says he is.

Here’s the aunt’s response:

Yes it is weird!

Yes Mytheos is my nephew and yes he is Jewish! I think I may have seen that post on Facebook!

Have a good night J

Here Holt’s mother:

I can positively confirm that my son is Jewish. We are Jewish as many generations back, on both sides, as I am aware of generations in my family. As far as I am aware, there is no one in the generations who is not Jewish. As I am his mother, his Jewishness is based on my religion, as you probably are aware. I was confirmed in the Jewish faith at Temple Beth Israel in Phoenix, Arizona, as was my sister, Jo Trust. Although my sister’s 2 sons were Bar Mitvah’ed. Myth was not, as I have become rather secular. [Editor’s note: Mytheos says he had informal one, who cares.] But, he was raised to embrace and be proud of his Jewish heritage, which he is. Please let me know if you need any other information to confirm that Mytheos is indeed Jewish.

Podhoretz attacked Joel Pollak merely for working at a publication that published a think piece on the rise of the alt-right (written by a half Jewish British queer and a half Pakistani-Brit).

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

The idea that any Jew would still work at Breitbart after its piece on the alt-Right beggars the imagination. Do you hear me, @joelpollak?

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) March 31, 2016

Pollak, with characteristic class, responded well to Podhoretz’s swipe.

(We didn’t all inherit jobs, John.)

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

Is that you Rabbi @jpodhoretz? What totalitarian tripe. The Talmud debates great diversity of views. As do I. @Nero https://t.co/hJQDQlszhT

— Joel Pollak (@joelpollak) March 31, 2016

Podhoretz continued to harass Pollak and Holt on Twitter. He also attacked another Jew and Breitbart CEO Larry Solov for daring to publish something about the alt-right. You know, sometimes it seems as if Podhoretz backs censorship or shaming his people.

Holt and Pollak aren’t the first to get the Podhoretz treatment.

In 2006 Phillip Weiss wrote an interesting missive about an unsolicited email from Podhoretz that attacked his Judaism.

Commentator Mike Cernovich is right.

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

Jews v. SJWs is going to be a big cultural fight. Media doesn't know how to cover it yet.

— Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) March 22, 2016

Alas, anyone who has done anything of interest on the internet has come in for attack by Podhoretz.

I reported on the Ebola scare of 2014 and came under fire again. You’ll note he was looking for the way to purge me with Josh Barro, son of the famed economist, who I’m sure has his job entirely on merit.

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

@jbarro I honestly don't know

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 4, 2014

Podhoretz first called me a mentally ill monster after I reported how James Foley had converted to Islam before ISIS decapitated him and that I didn’t feel sympathy for him as he was being beheaded.

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

Once again, Charles C. Johnson proves he is one of the worst people on Earth–calling a beheaded man a shill. May God forgive you. I won't.

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 27, 2014

The New York Times later confirmed my reporting about Foley’s conversion — it wasn’t forced but come to naturally — but Podhoretz didn’t care. He had already slimed me.

And he wasn’t even original about it. He calls everyone a “monster” if his Twitter feed is any indication though when I called him on that he called me a “sick fuck.”

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

Charles Johnson is a disgusting monster and no one should ever give him a nickel again. You unimaginable filth. https://t.co/v6dKurWJIc

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) August 20, 2014

Now he’s lecturing me about the meaning of words and about tone. Oh my.

He’s accused me of being a “Trumpkin theoretician” — I support Ted Cruz for president — and compared me to Adolph Hitler peddling the “Big Lie” by referencing the dual meaning of “faggot.” (Do you even Internet bro?)

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

It's no wonder Trumpkin theoreticians like Chuck Johnson say words don't mean what they mean. That's the essence of the Big Lie game.

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) April 2, 2016

Hey, John, guess what. My kin fought to liberate two continents and preserved the peace — they won the awards and built the NATO you want to expand to the point of breaking– but you’ll compare anyone to an anti-Semite these days even those of us with long histories of fighting for Israel and the Jewish people. My other grandfather worked with the Israelis to protect the peace in the 1970s and to resettle the Vietnamese civilians in America, those civilians whose country your kin thought should be decimated. My cousins and friends fought the wars you backed that have bankrupted our country and, to quote Trump, we didn’t even get the oil.

To paraphrase:

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

.@AceofSpadesHQ
I don't think Grandpa fought the Nazis so Democrats could call me a Nazi for being like my Grandpa. pic.twitter.com/x5CegbatGs

— John Rivers (@JohnRiversToo) June 29, 2015

Podhoretz is one of those commentators that works behind the scenes to purge people for thinking for themselves. He hasn’t had an original thing to say for much of his life so instead he sets about persecuting those of us who have.

Anyone who has ever read My Negro Problem–and Ours knows that the older Podhoretz knew the score when it came to the way blacks treated non-blacks.

But the younger Podhoretz decided to purge his then-colleague John Derbyshire at National Review for arguing much the same thing in Takimag.

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

I spent years on NRO's Corner expressing my disgust in ways large and small with John Derbyshire. Now he will reap the whirwind. Deservedly.

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) April 7, 2012

How philosemitic do you think an America that has fewer whites in it will be, John? Or will you run away fleeing the policies you push? Or will you wait for your young children to suffer it?

Regression to the mean is a hell of a thing, John. It’s a hell of a thing.

You might have noticed it in the decreasing quality of our neoconservative commentariat where nepotism is the rule, not the exception. If everyone is an anti-Semite, John, no one is. Such movements that are so inbred often become stillborn and that’s what exactly scares Podhoretz about the right of the alt right.

Podhoretz’s lucky dueling has been made illegal but barring that let’s let his donors know what kind of tweeting habit they are helping to subsidize. Over a 1oo,000 tweets, John? Come on now. I’ve already gathered some emails and will be collecting more. Enough is enough.

I wrote to Podhoretz and told him that we’ll be sending this story and others about him to his donors and he replied, “Please do. Thank you.” So let’s take him up on that.

And you’ll notice, John, that I didn’t even call you a cuckservative though the rumors about your failed first marriage and the way you treated your wife and she treated you were hard to avoid.

But you know that, don’t you, John?

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

#scariestTweets "Your ex-wife is now following you on Twitter!"

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 31, 2011

class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500">

I have no memory of who attended my 1997 wedding to my ex-wife and I'd like to keep it that way. I bet Martha Raddatz is the same.

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) October 10, 2012

The Observer published an article about the ill-fated marriage.

Over time, Mr. Kristol emerged as The Standard ‘s media face, and Mr. Podhoretz said he felt it had become “somebody else’s magazine.” Then love struck: In February 1997, Mr. Podhoretz ran into Ms. Hickey at a party thrown by Arianna Huffington. Mr. Podhoretz soon circulated news of his engagement in an e-mail to friends headed “This is not a put-on.” The couple was married in May. Three months later, Mr. Podhoretz told friends he hadn’t been in love after all. Said a friend of the couple, “they cut their losses.”

What a shame we can’t cut ours with the former Bush and Reagan speechwriter-turned-Twitter police.

Steve Sailer writes in 2005:

As you probably know, Ali G is a character who interacts with famous people, asking them idiotic questions (e.g., he inquired of Pat Buchanan whether any BLTs had been found in Iraq).

A reader writes:

I’m wondering if your mockery of John Podhoretz has been unfounded. I had stopped reading NRO a year or so ago because it was a little bit predictable, but since you highlighted Pod’s attempt to criticize John Derbyshire, the Corner has become essential reading. Every week John Podhoretz will attempt to argue with a different member of their team. Because he is one of them, they can’t just ignore him, they have to engage with him. And so they gradually get more and more frustrated as he doesn’t understand their points. He’s like an American Ali G.

For example, there was Andrew Stuttaford, and this week Ramesh Ponnuru was reduced to communicating as if he’s telling off a slightly backwards child:

“I’m not upset, but I do have better things to do. The reason I keep noting the fact that I have not made various points is that you keep erroneously attributing these points to me. Knock it off.”

Perhaps, but maybe JPod is the anti-Ali G. The comedian Sacha Baron Cohen who plays the moronic Pakistani wigger Ali G is actually a member of a brilliant British Jewish family (his cousin Simon Baron-Cohen is an important autism researcher). In contrast, perhaps John Podhoretz plays being a member of brilliant American Jewish family, but actually is a moron.

Jane Eisner writes Dec. 16, 2013:

Well, I certainly never had that happen before. In years of moderating sometimes heated public conversations, never has a panelist just walked off the stage. But that’s what Commentary editor John Podhoretz did Monday night. And I’m still trying to figure out why.

Of course, I expected a feisty evening when the venerable 92nd Street Y asked me to moderate a panel about what it means to be “pro-Israel” (their words), with Jeremy Ben-Ami, president of J Street; David Harris, executive director of American Jewish Committee, and Podhoretz. And from the outset, it was clear that Ben-Ami and Podhoretz were going to disagree about everything, with Harris positioning himself — literally and figuratively — in the middle.

We talked about the latest controversy at the Swarthmore College Hillel, and who should or should not be invited to speak at a Jewish institution.

We talked about the results of the Pew Research Center study that American Jews are more critical of Israeli government policies than many “pro-Israel” leaders would like, and what that means.

Throughout it all, Podhoretz was firmly, even aggressively, disagreeing with Ben-Ami, and the back-and-forth between them became a little testy. This is the hardest part of being a moderator – trying to make the split-second judgements over when to step in, and when to allow the debate to run its course.

But then we turned to an audience member’s question about the decision announced today by the American Studies Association to endorse an academic boycott of Israel. And things got harder, still.

Ironically, everyone on stage, myself included, believed that this was a hypocritical and ultimately counterproductive action. But after saying he disagreed with the ASA vote, Ben-Ami segued into talking about Israeli government policies that, in his view, make it difficult for some Americans to believe Israel really does want peace with the Palestinians.

You’re blaming the victim, cried Podhoretz. Some members of the audience became enraged, and, mystifyingly, the Commentary editor encouraged them, challenging them to boo and hiss.

And then — honestly, it’s a bit of a blur, but this is what I remember — he started wagging his finger at Ben-Ami in a manner at once threatening and condescending. That’s when I stepped in, trying to rein in the argument, using my hands (I am known to gesticulate) to try to calm him down.

Instead, Podhoretz angrily said that I raised my hand at him and stormed off the stage.

Whoa.

I am, physically, much, much smaller than John Podhoretz, so he could hardly allege that I was intending to do him harm. More than that, I was the moderator, and he had a responsibility to be civil on stage and, at the very least, listen to my requests. I was stunned by what I can only describe as a temper tantrum.

So was everyone else. To the great credit of Harris and Ben-Ami, we continued the conversation for the allotted time, with a spirited debate about the lengths to which American Jews can and should speak up and about Israeli policies.

But the damage was done. The chair was empty. Yes, I made a joke at one point about “Elijah” but it is hard not to view this lopsided scene as an incredibly sad commentary on the difficulty of engaging Jews with vastly different views on Israel in civil dialogue.

Or maybe it was just about one rude, angry man.

From the comments:

* Here is the significant part of Podhoretz&#039s reply:

In the course of her account, she claims that “mystifyingly,” I “encouraged” the audience to boo and hiss me. In fact, after a prolonged bout of booing, I responded by suggesting—in a manner that was intended, for what I would have thought were obvious reasons, to be ironic—that the crowd might try hissing too. Which they did. Maybe they didn’t pick up on the irony; Eisner apparently didn’t, given her level of mystification.

Eisner then says I wagged my finger “in a manner threatening and concescending” at Ben-Ami. As it happens, I had no problem with Ben-Ami personally throughout the panel, though we disagreed vehemently. And given that he was five or ten feet away from me and we were having an exchange that was mutually heated, I’m not sure how threatening my condescending finger-wagging could have been. (I am unaware there was any finger-wagging, by the way, but I will stipulate for the sake of comity that some wagging took place.)

Whatever I did, it was, to be sure, no more “threatening” than Eisner’s response, which was to put her hand up close to me for the purposes of quieting me down. Eisner seems to think that when I spoke in objection to this gesture, which I did angrily, I was perhaps fearful she was going to attack me physically—which is the height of silliness. I was annoyed by the hostility of the crowd, one of whose number had shrieked at me, and I was troubled by Eisner’s effort to shush me.

Bottom line: I’d had a long day and I didn’t see the point in spending more of it getting booed and shushed. So I left. So sue me.

* JPod is a chicken hawk and a chicken debater. The good news is that he just reduced his likelihood of being invited to other settings.

* Recreating a CNN “Crossfire” episode in front of a live audience of cranky, opinionated East Side middle-aged Jews is as likely to bring out thoughtful debate as posing the issue to a NASCAR audience during a crash slowdown.

* Eisner has served as an exemplary moderator on a number of occasions, and, as per my search, has never had any issues while serving in that role before. It seems, despite my surprise at the sincerity and openness of his response, that Mr. Podhoretz was responsible for the improprieties that took place at this event