Joe Biden Must Go Because The Desperate Nature Of The Situation Should Prevail Over Precedent (7-2-24)

The majority opinion is that it’s just inevitable that Joe Biden will become the nominee of the Democratic party for president of the United States because that’s the law. That’s the precedent. That’s the procedure. He’s made it through the various bureaucratic hurdles and he’s the presumptive nominee and only Joe Biden can turn down the honor.

I think the situation of Biden’s cognitive decline will outweigh precedent.

Biden is unfit to be president of the United States. He made that clear at Thursday night’s debate.

What kills me about the majority of pundit reaction is that they claim Joe Biden is capable of operating as president in the United States, it’s just that Biden is not capable of campaigning for president of the United States.

According to Axios, Biden has a hard time getting going before 10 am, and he has a hard time operating after 4 pm. And this is acceptable for the president of the United States?

If we get into a nuclear crisis, only the president of the United States can make the call whether or not we launched nuclear weapons. That can’t be fobbed off onto his staff. So you hear from the Biden team that he has a highly competent staff and when you’re are voting for Joe Biden, you’re also voting for his staff. But the staff can’t push the nuclear button.

Who’s been making the argument of the past five years that democracy is on the ballot, and that the vote for Biden is a vote for democracy. The Democrats who are led by a senile man. The people didn’t vote for Joe Biden’s staff. And he clearly has not been up to the office of president in the United States. So who’s been running the show?

Biden was saved from campaigning in 2020 by Covid. He was a frail old man who’s had that vacant checked out stare since 2018. And now the cognitive decline has accelerated over the past few months.

I hear from the political elite that we must follow the rules. Joe Biden is going to become the Democratic nominee for president because the law says that. He won the delegates in a rigged primary.

Is it the situation or is it the law that will decide this? I say it is the situation. It is more important than precedent. Joe Biden is a suicidal choice for the Democrats and for America.

The United States is in peril right now because its president is a senile old man who’s not up to the job.

There are things that are more important than the law such as the survival of your people.

America is an incredibly individualist country and so everything has to be negotiated because there’s little common feeling. We’re diverse and we have little in common with our fellow citizens.

So should the Democrats just give up and accept Biden as their nominee? No. Don’t give in to learned helplessness.

Japanese contend to me that Japan is limited in the steps that it can take to defend itself because of its constitution imposed upon it by United States after WWII. The Japanese have come to love learned helpless and relying on the United States for military protection. This is like some women I dated. Once we get locked into that intimate relationship and they know I want regular sex, they become more and more helpless. They think their lack of capability makes them more feminine and more attractive. Luke loves me because I’m pathetic. And initially that was been a turn on. I was able to sweep into a woman’s life and rescue her. That lasted a month and then they felt like a millstone around my neck. After six weeks, the sex was half as good as it was at the beginning and I’m looking to leave.

If breaking your constitution is what is required to survive, then break away. If they want to survive, the Japanese must be ready to break the constitution or to change the constitution. Law and the constitution should not be a death warrant.

Similarly, there’s the fourth commandment to remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Over 2200 years ago, some Jews would abide by this command and they would not fight back on the Sabbath and as a result, they were slaughtered. But this didn’t last long in Jewish life. The rabbis decreed that if on the Sabbath you need to fight to survive then you should fight. You can’t just check out from your responsibilities because God said to keep the Sabbath. Jews who took that attitude got wiped out. The Jews willing to pick up weapons and fight back on the Sabbath, they and their progeny often survived. In 1973, Israel was attacked on Yom Kippur, and Jews grabbed their weapons and won.

Approximately 2000 years ago in Jewish life in Israel, the Jewish law of not loaning money at interest meant that funds for loans had dried up. Rabbi Hillel came along with an innovation to the law, allowing loans to be classified as investments with returns.

Law depends upon narrative. And so the narrative that we have to follow the law is a powerful narrative, and that’s perhaps the most powerful narrative right now with regards to Biden, but if another narrative became more powerful such as that Biden is unfit to be president of the United States, Biden will step down.

Biden and his family are at war with reality. They’re going to lose. And even though legal procedures say only Joe Biden can decide to step away from the presidency, he has to find support for his narrative. If it becomes untenable to hold on to his story, he’ll have to give it up and with it, the presidency.

I am a convert to Orthodox Judaism. If I encountered Orthodox Jews who said to me that we don’t count you as Jewish, we won’t count you in a minyan, at a certain number of rejections, I’d have to give up my story and step away from Orthodox Judaism. We depend on others to support our narratives or we abandon our stories.

So we have all sorts of laws on the books that are enforced or not enforced depending on the situation and the dominant narrative. After George Floyd died, a dominant narrative with regard to policing was that we had too much of it and the police should back off from enforcing the law because when you enforce the law, you get racially disparate results.

You win against reality. Joe Biden will step aside for the good of the country when his narrative encounters too much opposition. So it’s just a trickle right now of Democratic politicians asking Biden to step aside. This trickle will turn into a flood.

Posted in Joe Biden | Comments Off on Joe Biden Must Go Because The Desperate Nature Of The Situation Should Prevail Over Precedent (7-2-24)

Why Does Liberalism Deny The Reality Of Joe Biden’s Decline? (7-2-24)

01:00 Where was the MSM on Joe Biden’s cognitive decline? https://www.semafor.com/newsletter/07/02/2024/mixed-signals-special-blame-the-media
03:30 Joe Biden Must Go Because The Desperate Nature Of The Situation Will Prevail Over Precedent (7-2-24) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0K-xB2alFDA
11:20 Japan’s pacifistic and helpless tradition since WWII, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_9_of_the_Japanese_Constitution
15:00 Joe Biden and the tragedy of liberal denialism, https://www.ft.com/content/d431b97f-7431-4066-bd80-9dab3b215fea
23:00 Hunter Biden seeks advice from his crack addict son Hunter
27:55 Should He Stay or Should He Go (Joe Biden, That Is)?, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/impolitic-with-john-heilemann/id1529346075?i=1000660927668
35:00 Are RW conspiracy theories always right? No! https://www.salon.com/2023/12/24/disturbing-pattern-the-most-unhinged-right-wing-conspiracy-theories-of-2023/
56:20 WSJ: Was There a ‘Biden’ Presidency?, https://www.wsj.com/articles/was-there-a-biden-presidency-election-voters-ec0839e4
1:01:00 Dem Elites SHUTDOWN Biden Replacement Talk, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9XmQn55Bgg
1:27:00 Americans will vote for Trump as the lead in America’s reality show for the next four years
Full transcript: https://lukeford.net/blog/?page_id=156047

Podnotes AI summary: The media is abuzz with concerns about President Joe Biden’s mental fitness and its implications for American politics. Democrats are especially angry, feeling misled by the administration that seems oblivious to their anger. Despite this, the mainstream media has been diligent in reporting on Biden’s apparent cognitive lapses.

The New York Times reports these incidents are becoming more frequent and worrying. If Trump were showing similar signs, it’s doubtful right-wing media would be as fact-focused as the MSM are with Biden.

The Republican Party and conservative outlets haven’t effectively investigated Biden’s mental state. Months ago, “The Wall Street Journal” attempted but only cited Republican sources.

Critics like Jill Abrams argue that journalists have failed to penetrate the White House’s secrecy about Biden’s health. It’s surprising how unprepared everyone was for his debate performance against Donald Trump – even seasoned reporters seemed shocked at his condition.

Some suggest that a less active president could be beneficial in certain circumstances; however, there is concern over whether someone of Biden’s age can handle emergencies requiring quick decisions.

Biden’s limited campaign schedule during COVID-19 raised questions about his capacity to serve full-time as president. His staff is touted as competent, but voters didn’t choose his team; they chose him based on democratic principles.

There’s also criticism of America’s individualistic culture where law often overrides social norms due to low trust among diverse populations. This leads to an overreliance on legal procedures instead of communal consensus.

Finally, despite all laws pointing towards Biden being the Democratic nominee again due to delegate counts and precedent, there is a powerful narrative surrounding his fitness for office that could challenge this assumption.

As president, one has the power to deploy nuclear weapons. The assumption is that a cognitively sharp leader is required for such decisions, but how often are these critical moments? Many argue you could have an unfit president and still be okay most of the time.

Stephen James acknowledges Donald Trump’s flaws and suggests that electing him might be the only way to move on. If Trump were declining mentally, would right-wing media admit it? They didn’t when he was in office; instead, they supported him.

During crises like the Cuban Missile Crisis, presidential action matters. Yet some suggest waiting for Joe Biden to finish his nap before addressing issues isn’t problematic unless another crisis occurs. In politics podcasts like John H’s with David Axelrod and anti-Trump Republican Mike Murphy, discussions about truth-telling arise.

Biden’s family tries to shield him as he disconnects from reality—similarly to our own defense mechanisms when facing life’s stresses. Some propose drafting Biden’s resignation using AA principles for honesty due to self-deception over his capabilities.

The 12-step model offers a framework for confronting one’s role in personal problems—an approach suggested for Biden’s administration too. For instance, my resentment list included a rabbi who asked me to leave their synagogue because I behaved against community standards online—I slowly came to a realization of my part in creating my own problems.

Media avoidance of Biden’s cognitive decline is compared with beat reporters’ reluctance to publish stories risking access loss—like avoiding critical industry coverage after criticizing it publicly myself once.

Conspiracy theories on both political wings are often false; accurate criticism is needed rather than ridicule or unfounded claims.

Trump supporters discuss potential achievements if re-elected: immigration control continuation, conservative Supreme Court justice appointments, foreign policy shifts away from interventionism—all reflecting actions seen during his first term.

Agenda 47 outlines Trump’s promises if re-elected: mass deportations, education system overhaul including school prayer reinstatement and race-based program bans; Affordable Care Act repeal; gender-affirming care restrictions; constitutional amendments imposing congressional term limits; investigations into political rivals; increased penalties for young offenders while boosting police immunity and deploying National Guard in “woke cities”; NATO reassessment demanding European nations pay America for protection.

This agenda also includes Muslim travel ban restoration and creation of “freedom cities,” promoting traditional energy sources over electric vehicles alongside ambitious projects like flying cars development.

In contrast stands Joe Biden whose performance raises concerns about effective governance moving forward amidst calls within Democratic circles questioning whether he should step aside despite past accomplishments or risk further damage by not directly addressing public doubts himself.

Despite the numerous legal challenges against Donald Trump, they haven’t destroyed the American legal system. Tucker Carlson warns of danger, but America has always faced threats. Democrats are urged to reconsider their stance as Biden’s perceived decline adds risk, according to Carlson.

Trump was criticized for his limited work capacity during his presidency, yet things didn’t fall apart. Now there’s concern over Biden’s cognitive abilities and whether he can handle another term or even public appearances without causing more harm than good.

The media focuses on Biden’s mental state while some argue it could be managed strategically during debates or minimized in interviews. However, doubts persist about his fitness for a second term and whether his administration truly reflects his leadership or is just a reaction to past political events.

Questions arise about the influence of advisors on Biden’s decisions and if he had any say in certain policies like appeasing Putin or handling controversies surrounding his son’s laptop incident.

Some suggest that if Democrats acknowledge Biden’s shortcomings publicly, it could lead to chaos within the party. There are also concerns about potential successors being less popular than him.

In politics, embarrassing moments happen – like Trump losing due to mishandling COVID-19 or Republicans failing because of incompetence. Similarly, Democrats may feel embarrassed by backing an impaired leader like Biden.

Strategies discussed include dismissing critics as overly anxious “bed-wetters,” manipulating polls to show stability in support for Biden despite debates suggesting otherwise; limiting dissent within the party; reassuring donors; proving vitality through controlled public appearances; and preparing for future debates with experienced advisors.

There is tension between public statements supporting Biden and private worries about electoral consequences if he continues leading the ticket into elections given his current unpopularity compared to other Democratic figures.

The stakes are high, and despite Joe Biden’s debate performance issues, there is still strong support for him in the Democratic Party. This creates a challenging situation as serious discussions about his campaign are ongoing at all levels. Questions arise about whether these conversations are rigorous and honest.

David suggests that the Biden campaign is actively engaging with concerns, which reflects competent campaigning behavior. However, doubts persist regarding voter fraud influencing elections significantly—a concern not backed by evidence according to Stephen James’ comments on UK politics shifting leftward.

Joe Biden has always been competitive and believed he could win; this attitude helped him secure an unexpected victory in 2020 when circumstances favored him due to COVID-19 and Trump’s perceived incompetence.

Concerns have grown among donors who feel misled by the portrayal of Biden’s capabilities. There is a mix of panic and anger over feeling deceived by the White House and campaign team.

The next few months leading up to the election will be critical for assessing risks associated with sticking with or moving away from supporting Biden as president for another term. The potential impact of Kamala Harris as a candidate if Biden steps down also raises questions about party unity and electoral strategy.

Despite some Democrats wanting alternatives to Biden after his debate performance, no clear consensus exists on who should replace him if necessary. Discussions around electability continue amidst polling data suggesting cognitive concerns among voters regarding both candidates—Biden’s mental fitness versus Trump’s character flaws.

Ultimately, decisions may hinge on upcoming polls from battleground states indicating whether it makes sense for Joe Biden to continue or step aside given growing pressures within his party amid fears of an overwhelming defeat come election time.

Posted in America, Joe Biden | Comments Off on Why Does Liberalism Deny The Reality Of Joe Biden’s Decline? (7-2-24)

Decoding The Suicidal Loyalty To Joe Biden (7-1-24)

01:00 Loyalty over truth is usually an effective life strategy
04:00 Joe Biden’s brief reaction to Supreme Court immunity ruling
16:00 Victor Davis Hanson on Biden’s speech
23:00 James Carville says the country is clamoring for change
28:30 WSJ: Democracy’s Death Has Been Greatly Exaggerated, https://www.wsj.com/articles/democracys-death-has-been-greatly-exaggerated-election-vote-a32f2a88
33:00 January 6 did not affect the lives of 99.99% of Americans, it was just embarrassing
38:00 Trump the Realist: The Former President Understands the Limits of American Power, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/donald-trump-realist-former-president-american-power-byers-schweller
53:30 HOOKUPS: are they freeing or defensive?, https://thisjungianlife.libsyn.com/hookups
57:00 Pig butcher scams, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=156015

Posted in America, Joe Biden | Comments Off on Decoding The Suicidal Loyalty To Joe Biden (7-1-24)

Pig Butcher Scams

Over the past two years online, I’ve often heard from attractive asian women who like photos I’ve posted such as this one:

They never want to meet in person nor talk on the phone. They want to get to WhatsApp as soon as possible. Then they talk about their impressive business and their international jet-setting lifestyles and they want to know how much I earn and they talk about their crypto investments, and by this point I’ve lost interest.

DC Palter writes:

Avoiding the New Pig Butchering Scam on LinkedIn

Attractive Asian women want to be your friend. What’s the catch?

…But the LinkedIn profiles of these attractive young women, mostly Chinese, seem off. Not the usual startup entrepreneurs. Though they live in Toronto or Los Angeles, they’re independently wealthy as a shareholder of a Chinese company or owner of a chain of beauty supply shops. Hmmm. Not sure why they’re connecting to a climate tech investor like me.

MIT Technology Review posted:

A scammer on LinkedIn may try to connect with someone through common work experience, a shared hometown, or the feeling of living in a foreign country. Over 60% of the victims who have reached out to GASO are Chinese immigrants or have Chinese ancestry, which these actors lean on to evoke nostalgia or a desire for companionship. The fake claims to have graduated from China’s top universities, which are notoriously difficult to get into, also help scammers earn respect.

While the pig-butchering scams targeting Chinese nationals are not the only kind of fraud happening on social media platforms like LinkedIn, they are exceptional for the amount of financial losses they have caused. GASO surveyed 550 victims and calculated the median loss to be $52,000; in comparison, the median financial loss from all types of fraud in the US in 2021 was $500, according to the Federal Trade Commission.

And on average, LinkedIn victims in particular tend to lose more money than victims of fraud on other platforms—oftentimes over a million dollars, says Yuen.

“Unlike dating sites, which are where the first scam victims were coming from, LinkedIn actually has a lot of information that’s really useful for the scammers,” she says. “They know your earning potential based on the type of work you listed.”

From Quora:

Their main interest is to separate you from your hard-earned money or get you involved in some “pump-and-dump” stock scheme so they can profit.

The typical approach is to use a photo of a cute girl to get your attention (candidly I’m not even sure they’re all women). They’ll then want to start chatting on WhatsApp or WeChat or telegram.

They’re not an AI bot. I am impressed by their nearly perfect English and good manners. They rarely make mistakes in spelling and punctuation. They’re adept at prompting you to open up by confiding about themselves. I sometimes felt flattered by their close attention and had to remind myself this is likely a scam.

My operating principle is that I don’t put anything into a text message or email (particularly to a stranger) that I wouldn’t want broadcast on a screen at Dodger stadium.

Needless to say, I’ve never lost money or much time in these chats.

These women never seem to have interesting ideas or edgy insights.

Posted in Asians | Comments Off on Pig Butcher Scams

Decoding The Significance Of Joe Biden’s Disastrous Debate Performance (6-30-24)

03:00 The Biden Crisis: Deep State Theory vs. Peak State Theory, https://www.stevesailer.net/p/the-biden-crisis-deep-state-theory
04:00 Mark Halperin’s post debate analysis, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sbxLN_WPSc
06:00 Dr. Jill Biden gets the blame, https://www.yahoo.com/news/jill-biden-encourages-husband-stay-114018139.html
31:30 Claire Khaw joins
1:24:00 Who’s running Joe Biden? https://www.stevesailer.net/p/the-biden-crisis-deep-state-theory
1:27:00 Trump’s relentless attacks on Biden, https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/28/trump-biden-debate-attacks-00165874
1:30:00 Analyzing the body language from Thursday’s debate, https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/06/28/trump-biden-debate-body-language-analysis-00165698
1:36:00 NETANYAHU’S GAMBIT SUCCEEDS, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lykMdXuxR2Q
2:13:00 Michael Smerconish explains why Democrats will benefit from a contested convention.
2:23:00 The conspiracy of silence among Joe Biden’s enablers
2:38:00 If Israel is to survive, it must strike Iran now, https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2024-06-30/ty-article-opinion/.premium/to-survive-israel-must-strike-iran-now/00000190-69e8-d01f-abbe-7de8d2260000
2:57:30 Did women in academia cause wokeness? https://www.noahsnewsletter.com/p/did-women-in-academia-cause-wokeness
3:03:50 Male vs female morality according to Amy Wax, Nathan Cofnas, Noah Carl
4:20:00 Hezbollah-Israel Escalation: Prospects for War, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMAdrVGRc0g
Who Determines The Winning Narrative? https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=155583

Transcript.

Podnotes AI summary: After Joe Biden’s troubling performance last Thursday, questions about his cognitive health have surged. Some claim he’s merely a puppet for the “deep state,” but I disagree. His policies align with his past positions, suggesting he’s not being controlled.

However, it was clear from the debate that Biden may lack the cognitive abilities expected of a president. It raises concerns: Is someone else running things? Steve Sailor blogged on whether Biden is just a figurehead or if he still wields power despite his decline.

Critics argue there’s no concrete evidence of who might be leading if not Biden himself. Fox News discussed how financial ties to China influenced Biden’s policies, contrasting his current silence on fentanyl with past activism against heroin linked to China.

Post-debate analyses were grim; many believe this confirmed fears over Biden’s mental fitness – an issue largely ignored by mainstream media until now. This reluctance echoes past tendencies to avoid negative stories about favored politicians while eagerly covering Trump’s faults.

Despite procedural reasons suggesting otherwise, it seems impossible for Biden to remain as the Democratic nominee after what we witnessed in the debate – yet replacing him isn’t straightforward either due to potential implications for Kamala Harris and other candidates.

In conclusion, loyalty mustn’t overshadow truth when assessing leadership capabilities crucial for our country’s future.

The unpredictability of politics is evident as some Democrats are reconsidering their stances, echoing the sentiments of figures like David Ignatius and Dean Phillips.
Fundraising remains crucial for political viability.

In response to rumors of an early debate being used to replace Biden with someone like Gavin Newsom, I disagree. Those orchestrating the early debates benefit from a Biden presidency and would lose influence otherwise.

If unexpected events lead to Kamala Harris taking office or Newsom becoming a candidate.. These two respond to incentives and might advocate increased enforcement against crime and homelessness – contrasting with Biden’s disconnection from these pressing issues.

Intellectuals disillusioned by Marxism in 1968 turned to human rights as their new utopia—fulfilling desires without empirical refutation possible when advocating for marginalized individuals globally.

This nurturing instinct can become selfish if it enables harmful behaviors rather than constructive support—a delicate balance between helping effectively and fostering dependency through enabling actions or learned helplessness.

I have a friend who often seems hopeless and asks for help, which can be annoying since she could find the answers herself by looking at our past conversations. She does so much for my show that I tolerate it, but it’s frustrating.

The term “PHAT” describes superficial communication where we’re just being friendly without true intent. It differs from manipulation, where someone relies on others instead of standing on their own two feet.

My friend keeps asking me easy questions to maintain contact and show her neediness. As for romantic involvement – not sure about that. After one breakup, I tried to stay connected with my ex by asking trivial things like retrieving items from her freezer; really just an attempt to keep in touch after an intense relationship ended.

We all resort to familiar manipulation tactics when struggling – they’re easier even if ineffective. Take Joe Biden; his visible tension suggests he’s repeating behaviors that are comfortable despite them being unhelpful.

The 1970s were pivotal, setting the stage for societal changes – feminism grew stronger and gay rights advanced significantly. Today’s lack of stigma around homosexuality has led some to choose lifestyles avoiding traditional family roles.

Despite this shift away from tradition in society, many elites lead conventional lives while promoting progressive values publicly. This contrast is striking considering how personal choices shape public personas and policies.

In politics, messaging matters; Democrats lose male support with language perceived as judgmental or feminine rather than relatable or understanding.

Finally, there’s speculation about whether Biden truly runs the country or if unseen forces control decisions – yet it appears he still makes key calls himself within his capabilities.

Who’s really controlling Biden? He’s not as charismatic as Trump. Biden often goes off-script despite his team’s efforts to prepare him. His performance in debates is lackluster; he can’t keep up with Trump’s attacks.

Body language expert Joe Navarro says our feet reveal our true intentions, suggesting Biden looked old during the debate. As we age, we lose sensitivity in nerves affecting balance and walking speed—Biden’s walk suggested just that.

Trump’s tan contrasted with Biden’s paleness, implying health and vitality. In body language too, Trump seemed more dynamic while Biden appeared static. Experts suggest vocal training could improve Biden’s voice.

Post-debate analysis questions if Democrats should continue supporting an apparently declining Biden or seek a younger candidate for future success. The impact of international events on U.S politics also raises concerns about America appearing vulnerable globally.

If Biden were to drop out due to poor debate performance or other reasons, it would likely happen after discussions with close family members Sunday.

DNC rules allow changes in nominees under certain conditions; however, convincing Joe Biden to withdraw will be tough.

In politics, power dynamics often hinge on one person’s decision—as seen with Joe Biden deciding to run again despite concerns about his fitness for office.

Kamala Harris as president would invite intense scrutiny over her entry into politics as Willie Brown’s mistress—a topic previously unexplored by media but potentially exploited by opponents like Trump.

A poor debate performance raises questions about Joe Biden’s ability to continue leading effectively. His team must address these issues promptly as they impact fundraising efforts and voter confidence ahead of elections.

The debate rules, including no audience and muted mics, favored Trump. Biden struggled with coherence at times, highlighting concerns about his mental fitness. Critics argue that enablers are keeping him in the race when he should step down.

Trump’s performance was restrained but still divisive; however, many believe it won’t erase doubts about his character or past actions. Meanwhile, Democrats face a tough decision: stick with Biden or find a new candidate amidst fears of Trump’s re-election.

Media coverage is criticized for not fact-checking enough during debates. The focus on Biden’s poor showing overshadows Trump’s lies and evasions—fueling frustration among voters seeking better options.

Ultimately, unless those closest to Biden push for change, discussions on alternatives remain theoretical. With tensions high over Iran and Israel’s security at stake, some advocate for preemptive action against Iran’s nuclear capabilities despite potential backlash.

Israel demands a ceasefire and Hezbollah troop withdrawal in southern Lebanon, but Netanyahu insists on continuing the war until Hamas is defeated politically and militarily. This stance creates tension between Washington and Jerusalem, alongside disagreements over arms supply.

Listeners question the relevance of these political issues to their daily lives, suggesting they only matter for personal interest or entertainment. The discussion shifts to the porn industry’s decline due to free online content. Only creators who establish personal connections with their audience can now profit in industries like journalism or pornography.

Netanyahu’s acceptance of Biden’s deal seems consistent with his previous statements despite media claims of inconsistency. Middle Eastern conflicts don’t directly affect average Americans’ quality of life, despite potential large-scale casualties.

Netanyahu expanding war aims beyond Gaza hint at a broader conflict involving Iran. Israel needs significant U.S. support for such multi-front wars.

Discussions also touch on gender dynamics in academia and society at large, exploring how women’s increasing influence may shift cultural values towards more nurturing perspectives even within intellectual arenas traditionally dominated by men’s approaches focused on truth-seeking behavior. This leads into an analysis that suggests prioritizing education for the gifted would be more beneficial than current efforts aimed at less capable students.

Finally, there is mention of law emerging from narratives rather than objectively; it reflects societal trends favoring underperforming groups domestically and internationally—a trend linked partly to declining fertility rates among women redirecting maternal instincts toward social causes.

People are concerned about a potential cover-up involving Biden’s family and staff. Videos showing Jill Biden speaking to him as if he were a child have surfaced, fueling fears among friends and family who aren’t deeply into politics but are now upset.

There’s anger towards the Bidens and speculation about what this means for America’s enemies. The focus is on how this could impact future elections and young voters’ perceptions. The choice of Kamala Harris as VP has also drawn criticism; despite her historic position, she faces scrutiny over competence.

The U.S. State Department has raised its travel advisory level for Lebanon due to potential conflict escalation—other countries urge citizens to leave too. Israeli Defense Minister Gantz warns of severe repercussions for Lebanon in case of war while Hezbollah threatens retaliation.

Experts discuss how community displacement affects both sides differently; Israelis want reassurance before returning home amid ongoing threats whereas Hezbollah supporters seem less concerned about ending hostilities despite widespread damage in South Lebanon.

Finally, any full-scale war between Israel and Hezbollah would be devastatingly larger than previous conflicts with Gaza—with each side having different definitions of victory but common ground in survival as a key measure of success.

Posted in America, Joe Biden | Comments Off on Decoding The Significance Of Joe Biden’s Disastrous Debate Performance (6-30-24)