Luke Ford

From the New York Times: On an early morning in June 2017 a teenage girl got on a plane in San Jose and flew to Los Angeles, arriving at a testing center in West Hollywood to take a college-entrance exam.
Her parents, Elizabeth and Manuel Henriquez, a Silicon Valley hedge fund manager, had handpicked the testing site.
While most students take their entrance exams at large public high schools near their homes, the Henriquezes chose a private institution, the West Hollywood College Preparatory School.
It was one of two testing sites where Mr. Singer cultivated relationships with test administrators who would accept bribes, according to court documents. For $10,000 per test, and sometimes more, the documents say, Igor Dvorskiy ensured that students could be given answers from the proctor.
Federal prosecutors say that’s what happened when the Henriquezes’ daughter arrived.
On a visit this week, nothing at the school suggested it was the site of one of the biggest testing scandals in decades. It is tucked inside a small building of a large old synagogue. The entrance to the school is a solitary white door with a small blue sign emblazoned with its name.
The school’s website describes it as offering a “‘cradle-to-college’ education by providing a family-like nurturing academic environment with small class sizes.” Mr. Dvorskiy is listed as the director of the school.
The court documents make clear that federal investigators closely monitored the school for several months, tracking Ms. Dvorskiy on the days of the college entrance exams with Mr. Singer’s clients.
Typically, Mr. Singer would tell his clients “fabricate a reason — such as a bar mitzvah or a wedding — that their children purportedly needed to take the test in Houston or West Hollywood instead of at their own schools,” according to court documents.
“The extent of the fraud that took place at this testing center should be a major red flag to the College Board,” said Alexis Redding, a visiting scholar at the Harvard Graduate School of Education who has studied college admissions. “There has always been tremendous variability in the quality and professionalism of testing sites and that opens the door for cheating to occur. Students tend to know which sites have inattentive proctors or lax policies.”

I’m not a fan of the man, but he was great at Twitter.

I don’t know who these people are, but this is one of JPod’s better tweets, actually.

Do JPod’s followers own any neutron bombs? I doubt that the Strategic Air Command will neutron bomb NYU. (But it is the 16th Anniversary of the Iraq Attaq, so stupider things have happened…) pic.twitter.com/fln6qp1KuW

— Steve Sailer (@Steve_Sailer) March 21, 2019

From the New York Times: Sheila Katz was a young executive at Hillel International, the Jewish college outreach organization, when she was sent to visit the philanthropist Michael H. Steinhardt, a New York billionaire. He had once been a major donor, and her goal was to persuade him to increase his support. But in their first encounter, he asked her repeatedly if she wanted to have sex with him, she said.

Deborah Mohile Goldberg worked for Birthright Israel, a nonprofit co-founded by Mr. Steinhardt, when he asked her if she and a female colleague would like to join him in a threesome, she said.

Natalie Goldfein, who was an officer at a small nonprofit that Mr. Steinhardt had helped establish, said he suggested in a meeting that they have babies together.

Mr. Steinhardt, 78, a retired hedge fund founder, is among an elite cadre of donors who bankroll some of the country’s most prestigious Jewish nonprofits. His foundations have given at least $127 million to charitable causes since 2003, public filings show.

But for more than two decades, that generosity has come at a price. Six women said in interviews with The New York Times and ProPublica, and one said in a lawsuit, that Mr. Steinhardt asked them to have sex with him, or made sexual requests of them, while they were relying on or seeking his support. He also regularly made comments to women about their bodies and their fertility, according to the seven women and 16 other people who said they were present when Mr. Steinhardt made such comments.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* I’ve had two nephews marry Asian girls. I tried to get some of this info out of them in a discreet way without ruining Thanksgiving. I found out:

1.) Parents don’t care if they marry white guys because they consider western culture to be reasonably functional. I mean the kids grow up practicing Bach 6 hours a day so clearly they don’t have contempt for westerners. However parents would flip out if they brought home a black guy.

2.) On our side of the family, my brother really didn’t care, my sister in law seemed slightly perturbed but nothing too bad. I think it was the same deal for them.

3.) Asian girls are just killin’ it in the dating/marriage market. They have access to the top cohort of both the whites and Asians. I think the high AF outmarriage rates are just because they can get whomever the heck they want. I think this is because WF have damaged their brand, so to speak, by things like pussy hat marches. I don’t think WF realize how off putting stuff like that is to most men. You don’t want to come home at the end of a long day to someone who seems to prioritize abstract social causes over the immediate family, or views you as ‘the enemy.’

4.) My 5 grand-nephews range from looking mostly asian to looking like dark haired whites. Two of them just look like darker haired Bavarians to me. None of them look totally Asian because they all have brown hair, although it will probably darken with age.

* USA’s legacy Japanese population, which arrived in the early 20th century, has more or less vanished – blended into the mass of American whites by rates of intermarriage greater than 50%.

* I consider myself an Anglo-American separatist and would prefer a country with a strong White majority (>90%). That said, I live in a mostly Chinese neighborhood in SF and under Chinese rule you can at least go about your daily life without being ‘molested’. Yes, in China proper there’s no real Western rule of law, but my experience with the American-ish Chinese isn’t half bad. They’re generally friendly and congenial neighbors. In fact, if it were only the Chinese in our neighborhood (ie no risk of schizophrenic homeless people wandering in) I would have no problems with my wife walking to the corner store alone at 10 pm. Needles to say, this is much, much better than my experience growing up next to a Black neighborhood and going to half Black schools.

* I’m very curious about the attitudes about this among the Chinese. It seems deracinated American whites don’t bat an eye about race mixing. No SWPL white feels grief that their grand-child is half Asian. But what do the Chinese feel about it?

It doesn’t seem like much parental authority is being spent on keeping their daughters away from white men. Because it’s not working. Is Daddy Chang upset that his daughter is totting around a white or Jewish boyfriend? Or do they just see it as a clever business transaction?

* The white guy-Asian girl combo is definitely common in NYC. Landing a white guy is a step up socially for most girls from immigrant families, so the parents don’t seem to crack down on it like Indian families. I’ve known multiple Indian girls who kept their white boyfriends a secret from their family. Not the case with my Chinese acquaintances, although I’m sure it can happen.

Jewish guys and Asian girls are especially common. Jewish guys are at a masculinity disadvantage versus gentiles, but when competing against Asian guys for Asian girls they actually have a masculinity advantage and they’re wittier than Asian guys while still having equal if not better career prospects. Both sides feel like they’re dating up. Jewish girls must really be feeling the squeeze. As a Jewish girl I dated put it, “when you’re trying to meet a hot guy at a bar, you’re competing against blondes. When you’re husband hunting, you’re competing against Asians.”

* Let me tell you something about these topics (I’m married to a Chinese woman and we have two kids):

– the kids definitely do not look Chinese (nor do they look white). Boys tend to look kind of mixed, not very masculine facial features. That’s why i expect my son to one day marry an Asian girl. The girls can be very, very beautiful, by universal acclaim. I would bet my daughter will one day marry a white guy.

– Chinese don’t seem to mind mixed marriages. It’s as if they only care about gene propagation. In Eastern Europe, Chinese couples give their children local names, kids learn the local language, etc. How young Chinese men feel when they see mixed couples (white guy, Asian girl) I can only guess.

* The fears expressed about NYC are overblown. Take the Bay Area, which is much further down the pipeline in terms of Asian immigration. Statistically, it is around 40%, but anecdotally, it is higher, varying wildly by neighborhood.

The Bay Area also provides a glimpse into what Chinese-Americans will look like in 20-30 years. A large portion of the Chinese in SF Area are second generation, with high-academic achievement often at good US schools, high savings rates, and other Tiger Mom attributes, and they have a short drive to the most dynamic economy on Earth. In other words, creme de la creme of Chinese population, with opportunity staring them in the face.

Yet, among this group, virtually no successful Chinese entrepreneurs. The rare exception is typically Taiwanese. Very rare to see a Chinese executive. Probably does not bode well for long-term viability of Chinese economy. US elite colleges are also likely sweating bullets over AA, since high influx of Asians will translate into collapsing endowments a decade later.

But, as another poster pointed out, Chinese neighborhoods — Chinatown aside — are typically safe, albeit drab. Socially, the Chinese tend to be insular, often cliquing up in professional settings, likely because they are put off by Westerner extraversion. In terms of immigrant groups, they are fairly neutral it terms of pro vs. con. Cannot say the same about Hispanic immigrants or non-high-caste Indians. These groups will ruin a city, with the prior hurting blue-collar neighborhoods and the later breaking down social cohesion in more affluent areas.

* A sizable bloc of Chinese voters is almost always a good thing for White people in the same jurisdiction. They are for law and order, meritocracy, and good schools. Plus they are immune to super-annoying white guilt complex.

They also don’t seem to have the same hyper-developed political drive as Jews in terms of controlling institutions.

So I’d say the Yellow Peril is pretty low on the list of existential threats to traditional America.

* You can grow together because you are Racial Equals and thus criticize one another in a self-correcting manner without hurt feelings. Being able to criticize someone is really important.

Healthy white+white marriages both spouses tend to grow and flourish.

White + Other marriages (even model-minority) someone is always an enabler…There’s a reason why the Gay Journalist who put Crystal Meth up his Ass was married to an Asian woman.

* Indians are the new Jews, not the Chinese. They are loquacious and shameless like the Jews, and favor the professions of law, media, academia, banking, tech and civil service like their Jew masters. East Asians are more like the Germans, quiet, STEM oriented, hard working, understated and conformist, they do not like to stand out. The only difference is, they lack the honesty of Germans.

* The Asian-white mix is basically nature’s photo-shop, it’s God using the blur feature..

Report from Scientific American.

From ApplyMagicSource.com after I gave it access to my Twitter account:

Openness to experience describes a dimension of personality that distinguishes imaginative, creative people from down-to-earth, conventional people.
Your digital footprint suggests that you are intellectually curious and appreciative of what you consider beautiful, no matter what others think. You might say that your imagination is vivid and makes you more creative than many others.
Conscientiousness concerns the way in which we control, regulate, and direct our impulses.
Your digital footprint suggests that you are random and fun to be around but can also plan and persist when life requires it. It appears that depending on the situation, you can make quick decisions or deliberate for longer if necessary.
Extraversion is marked by pronounced engagement with the external world, versus being comfortable with your own company.
Your digital footprint suggests that you are similar to people who prefer low-key social occasions, with a few close friends. You might say that it’s not that you are afraid of large parties; they’re just not that fun for you.
Agreeableness reflects individual differences in concern with cooperation and social harmony.
Your digital footprint suggests that you can find it difficult to get along with others when you first meet them. You might be suspicious of others’ motives in this situation. It also looks like people warm to you over time, and you to them, although that doesn’t stop you telling them “how it is”.
Neuroticism refers to the tendency to experience negative emotions.
Your digital footprint suggests that you are generally calm. You come across as someone who can feel emotional or stressed out by some experiences, but your feelings tend to be warranted by the situation.

Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Perceiving
INTPs are quiet, thoughtful, analytical individuals who don’t mind spending long periods of time on their own, working through problems and forming solutions. INTPs tend to be less at ease in social situations and the “caring professions” although they enjoy the company of those who share their interests. They also tend to be impatient with the bureaucracy, rigid hierarchies, and politics prevalent in many professions, preferring to work informally with others as equals.

INTPs’ extraverted intuition often gives them a quick wit, especially with language, and they can defuse the tension in gatherings by comical observations and references. They can be charming, even in their quiet reserve, and are sometimes surprised by the high esteem in which their friends and colleagues hold them.

Manifesto

00:00 KMG has his cam working!
02:00 Attacks on Christchurch mosques
2:00:00 Millennials are so buried in debt they can’t buy into American Dream of owning a home
2:06:00 Facebook’s Crisis Management Algorithm Runs on Outrage
2:08:00 Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
2:10:00 8chan, 4chan influence on New Zealand shooter
2:15:00 Are we heading for civil war?
2:30:00 Lisa Page: Obama DOJ Ordered FBI Not to Prosecute Hillary Clinton
2:35:00 NYPD Hate Crimes Unit Investigating Vile Defacing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg Poster in Brooklyn
2:37:00 Spiritual leader of alleged New York sex cult hit with child porn charges
2:41:00 Tel Aviv deploys ‘zombie traffic lights’ for phone-obsessed pedestrians
2:44:00 Teresa Giudice’s husband Joe is released from prison into ‘ICE custody’
2:46:00 Rabid raccoons are taking over New York City
2:49:00 Tesla whistleblower: Elon Musk claimed I was a mass shooter in revenge campaign
2:51:00 ‘We are all Beto’s dog.’ How Artemis the ‘sad dog’ stole the show from 2020 candidate
2:55:00 Cuomo’s petty trans-rights authoritarian play
2:57:00 BOOK CLUB: Jake’s Thing by Kingsley Amis

https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/kingsley-amis/jakes-thing/

https://www.dailywire.com/news/44631/mother-11-year-old-drag-kid-who-performed-gay-bar-amanda-prestigiacomo?%3Futm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwtwitter
https://www.christianpost.com/news/at-least-32-christians-killed-as-mob-burns-homes-church-in-nigeria.html?fbclid=IwAR3OjWW6VuB8vyD-0KtNAvKz43b7wIWVKgMscnKwnL_VSJy1zTNpIPY7PtI

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-politics-beto-orourke/

https://www.star-telegram.com/news/nation-world/national/article227692109.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6812419/Outrage-Australian-politician-blames-immigration-Christchurch-mosque-shooting.html

https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2019/03/14/top-us-general-google-is-indirectly-benefiting-the-chinese-military/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6812527/Inside-life-New-Zealands-worst-terrorist.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6812583/The-EU-demand-two-year-delay-Brexit-second-referendum-softer-deal.html

https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/14/tucker-amazon-shannon-allen-suicide/

https://www.france24.com/en/20190314-germany-probes-far-right-threats-politicians-celebs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Islamist_attacks_on_churches

https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/14/pelosi-supports-lowering-voting-age-16/

https://www.businessinsider.com/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-suspect-online-clues-radicalization-2019-3?r=US&IR=T

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/434190-ocasio-cortez-calls-out-nra-after-new-zealand-shootings-what-good-are-your

https://www.thewrap.com/candace-owens-ripped-for-lol-reaction-after-new-zealand-massacre-suspect-named-her-biggest-influence/

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/14/romney-alexander-national-emergency-1221317

BREXIT: https://www.apnews.com/f68cafee91a14ffd9e3485b656b3dd6c

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/8642613/brexiteers-tell-theresa-may-they-will-now-back-her-deal-if-she-quits-immediately/

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/high-school-rocked-by-sexting-scandal-controversy-over-punishments/930141545

Joe* says:

You really scooped everyone yesterday by posting the manifesto even before the first news reports were coming in. How did you get hold of it? [LF: 8Chan]

The mainstream media is of course ignoring the substance of what Tarrant wrote. I heard one terrorism expert on CBS news this morning say there was nothing new in it, which I suppose is true, but it does give a comprehensive and coherent insight into his motivations.

It seems that Tarrant (and to a lesser extent Brevik, but not Dylan Roof) believes that (1) Western civilization is worthy of preservation and defense, (2) Western governments are not interested in preserving or promoting Western civilization with official and unofficial actions undermining traditional Christian beliefs, promoting immigration and favoring immigrants over natives, not inculcating immigrants into Western values, but promoting multiculturalism and preservation of loyalty to the immigrants’ home country. Tarrant subscribes to the oft quoted maxim that immigration without assimilation is invasion.

He is very focused on declining birth rates among those of European stock and the higher birthrate among immigrants of non European stock.

He clearly believes that the day is coming when whites will be a minority in countries in which they used to dominate and that as a minority they will find themselves in a situation where the majority discriminates against them, and discrimination may be the least of the problems if the immigrants and non-European stock do not accept and enforce western style protection of human rights.

Last night when I told my wife he had written “For Rotherham” on his rifle stock, she told me it sounded like I was saying his action was justified. I am sure that in his mind his action was justified. He thinks of himself as a modern John Brown (who hoped his raid on Harper’s Ferry would be the spark for the civil war that would end slavery).

These questions [about Western Civ] need to be asked of all politicians and leaders among the immigrants, and according to Tarrant, especially Muslims (he seems to think that the Turks are the worst, and of course they have been in Germany long before the more recent wave of refugees inundated the country).

Rather obviously, and I regret that I have to say this, but if I don’t what I write will be misinterpreted, what Tarrant did was commit murder under the laws of New Zealand. In the U.S. it would also be a hate crime. Since these are the effective laws of the country, Tarrant will have to answer for this criminally and if New Zealand had the death penalty he would be put to death. As it is he imagines he will be vindicated and released from prison after 27 years, like Mandela which would put him in his mid 50’s. I wonder whether Newsom would refuse to enforce the death penalty against Tarrant if he were convicted of 49 counts of murder in California and sentenced to death?

So I want to make it clear, I unequivocally condemn this action. Nothing that I write should be seen as in any way condoning Tarrant’s act. This analysis is however important in understanding his motivation.

The other side of this is what Tarrant hoped to accomplish. As Tarrant points out there have been and continue to be many terrorist acts perpetrated by Muslims in Western Countries. These range from the 9-11 attacks, to the Bataclan attack, to car attacks, the Charlie Hebdo attacks, to the sexual grooming of English and other European teenagers by Muslim gangs. As anyone knows, there have not been similar attacks on Muslim communities in the West. The Baruch Goldstein attack in Israel is one, and this is another, but that is about it. One can argue, as many Muslims do, that the West doesn’t need to engage in these sorts of attacks since military actions taken in many Muslim nations (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen (although not directly by Western powers there) and of course Israel against Palestinian areas, have killed and terrorized a far larger number of Muslims than what Muslims have done in the west.

I think that one of the things that Tarrant was trying to accomplish was to make Muslim immigrants aware that their position in Western nations is not secure and that unless and until there is full assimilation (which according to Tarrant is impossible absent abandoning Islam for Christianity) at any time they could be targeted. In this way he is trying to make them take the same mindset as Jews have in many countries in Europe with large and restive Muslim immigrant populations. I think the natural response to this is not to be terrorized but rather will lead to the employment of private security guards, training members of the Muslim community to defend the Mosques, and more police protection.

But it is important to realize how effective a series of terrorist attacks can be in undermining the psyche of the Muslim communities. Under the British Mandate in Palestine, there were many attacks by Arabs on Jews and this was most effectively dealt with when the Jews began terrorist reprisals against Arabs. This persisted throughout the war of Independence as a way of “encouraging” Arabs to leave areas the Jews wanted for themselves. This same pattern played out in the war for Algerian independence. It also was used after the breakup of Yugoslavia following Tito’s death. It was used by settlers against Native Americans, who responded in kind when they were able to.

We shall see whether there are in fact others who are willing to act in the same way. As the New Zealand authorities said, none of the suspects arrested were on any sort of watch list. The left plays up that there is some sort of huge secret underground neo nazi right even though there is precious little evidence of that. That Tarrant called himself a fascist will also be used to discredit him.

But when you look at the “principles” ranging from anti corporatism to pro environmentalism, I am sure that those aspects of what Tarrant espoused will be whitewashed and only his racism and fascism will be stressed.

The Christchurch killer: