Whites Fight Back Against Anti-White Hostility

I hardly think Jews would take the crap that whites accept on a daily basis.

A group that is too cowardly to take its own side in a fight probably doesn’t deserve to survive.

From the Washington Post:

A Facebook page ostensibly created for an audience at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign called “Illini White Students Union” has drawn fire after it characterized the national Black Lives Matter movement as “terrorism.”

Created Wednesday after a protest sympathetic to Black Lives Matter, the page declared itself “for white students of University of Illinois to be able to form a community and discuss our own issues as well as be able to organize against the terrorism we have been facing from Black Lives Matter activists on campus,” as the Daily Illini reported.

The page did not last long in its original incarnation, but was taken down after three hours. It has since been revived here.

“We recognize the right to free speech, and we encourage you to exercise that right when you see examples of racism, discrimination or intimidation on our campus,” Interim Chancellor Barbara Wilson, who called the page “extremely disturbing,” wrote in a message Thursday to the student body.

In an anonymous message to the News-Gazette, the page’s administrator discussed Black Lives Matter.

“We feel they disrupt student daily life and activity far too much,” the message read, saying that movement “marginalizes” white students. “… We are in the United States and not Africa and we don’t desire to have an African flag on campus.”

The current page is bare bones — just a few links to news stories about the controversy with an image of a statue on campus. The “about” section dedicated the page to “White Pride and a safe place for White students,” according to the News-Gazette, though that page appeared to have changed.

A recent post was a clip from the 1998 film “American History X,” in which Edward Norton plays a white supremacist. In the clip, billed as “revelant to all Ferguson news,” Norton’s character denounces the 1992 riots in Los Angeles.

“It’s a bunch of people grabbing any excuse they can find to go and loot a store, nothing more,” Norton says. “… Lincoln freed the slaves what, like, 130 years ago. How long does it take you to get your act together?”

While this was certainly eyebrow-raising, the original page was even more provocative.

“Feel free to send in pictures you take of any black protestors on the quad so we know who anti-whites are,” one message read, as FOX 55 reported.

According to a student reporter, protesters were particularly concerned that they were being targeted.

“One of the parts on the page particularly concerning to students is that they were taking pictures from the rally of the main quad and identifying students in attendance to identify the ‘anti-whites,’” Marijo Enderle, a 20-year-old senior at the university, said in a telephone interview. Enderle also pointed out that “there hasn’t been any indication that it has been a university student” who created the page.

Student or not, university administrators strongly denounced the effort. Not only was the page offensive — it used the university’s trademark without permission.

“It is disturbing and cowardly that someone would create an anonymous and senseless social media page specifically designed to intimidate others, including and especially our students. When we became aware of the page, we immediately contacted Facebook and requested that it be removed,” campus spokesman Robin Kaler wrote in an e-mail to the Daily Illini. “Facebook has been responsive to our requests, but the page continues to be reposted. We are continuing to work with Facebook to address this matter. We recognize that passions run deep on all sides of many issues, but actions like this are senseless and hurtful and do nothing to foster meaningful dialogue.”

Commenters’ views of the page differed.

“It is so sad to see that such ignorance still exists in 2015,” one commenter wrote. “The creator and supporters of this page are pathetic. These people are cowards that hide behind an anonymous account. Grow up.”

“As a Mexican American I do not find this page racist or in poor taste,” another wrote. “It’s only fair that you are allowed to have your own page and the same rights to freedom of speech as black Illini students have.”

In a Facebook message to The Washington Post, one man who posted a message in support of the white students union explained his thinking.

“What I do like about it is they are fighting for the rights of the white man which are dwindling faster than a rabbit on meth!” Alan Scroggins, a 37-year-old stay-at-home dad from Rantoul, Ill., wrote. “I’m not racist, but I’m proud of my heritage! You know!”

Asked whether he was concerned the page might be considered racist, Scroggins said “not really.”

“The second a white guy says anything about being proud he’s labelled anyway!” he wrote. “Trust me I don’t hide my pride!”

This is not the first time a white student union has been proposed at a U.S. university. A white student union, for example, cropped up at Towson University in Maryland in 2012.

“Every ethnic group has its own advocacy group but white students don’t,” senior Matthew Heimbach said at the time. He added: “Any time there’s a group with conservative principles and white students standing up for themselves, it’s a battle cry for radical leftists on campus. … There’s nothing I could do or say … to try and get these people on the same page as us.”

And in 1991, the New York Times discussed a similar group at the University of Minnesota.

“I have no desire to harm the non-white races,” senior Thomas A. David, who founded the group, said at the time. “I simply think it would help everyone to separate.” He added: “I don’t want to be a mud race in this country, and I will fight to the death against that.”

FROM THE WP COMMENTS:

* A group to celebrate White Pride, the great achievements of Whites, and to oppose the Leftist fraud of Black Lies Matter, where do I sign up?

* Our dear leader…Obama…has recently used the highest office in the land to heap praise upon the BLM movement while repeatedly castigating the NRA. (I am not a member of either)

So with that said, answer me this: Which of these 2 groups has a history of directly inciting and committing violence, crime, anti-police and anti-American behavior?

The answer to that question should make the real problem in this country a tad clearer to the participation trophy loving Gruber’s that love to play the victimhood card at the slightest hurt feeling.

* Fairly simple. Just make the charter and mission statement and all other statements mirror the other side. with the change only of any reference to race to the opposite.
Black becomes white. Gay, straght. female, male.
If, if it is {racist| homophobic | sexist} in those words, then it must be with original words. Period. Allow both or ban both. Stamp out double standards.

* As a left handed person i feel marginalized.. Everything is built for RH people, even the way we write!

As a protest Im only typing with my left hand, and curses to anyone who tries to stop me!

* Wow, so it’s ok for blacks to say and do pretty much anything they please, but, let a white person speak out and all hell breaks loose. Who are the real racists here?

* White student unions are badly needed throughout college campuses. Better yet, whites only colleges, as nationally campuses have become so corrupted with the pro-black-and-brown, anti-white messages they can no longer provide safe, learning environments for whites.

* I found that one of the nice things about being a White male when I was attending college is that I was able to stay focused on going to class, studying, and chasing women. Every minority group had their own organization, fraternity, sorority and annoying anger filled rallies. I was free, free to do my own thing. There will always be movements like BLM that essentially take away the freedom of its members via brainwashing and time wasting. Let them be. Focus on school and move on with your life.

* How odd that African-Americans involved in the Black Lives Matter can intimidate, censor the media, and call white students terrorists. In August, BLM students shouted down Bernie Sander and took over the podium at a Washington State university. The liberal white students cheered. According to the US Census Bureau, Washington State has a black population of 3.6%. Basically, what that means is that we support you, we just don’t want to live near you. Why doesn’t Seattle build low cost housing units for blacks in a location with high job growth? The national unemployment rate for African-Americans is 9.5%. Thanks Obama!

My sister lives in a wealthy sub-division in Bend, OR. Another liberal enclave. My sister is a committed liberal, yet the African-American population in Bend, according to the US Census Bureau, is less then 5/10ths of 1%. Do you think she would want the Federal Government to build low cost housing units near her sub-division? No way. It would lower that value of her $3 million dollar home. Liberal hypocrisy.

I live in the Deep South. Some States in the South have a black population approaching 50%. Why aren’t liberal white protesters moving here? Why are African-Americans moving to the South in record numbers if the South is such a horrible place to live? Why aren’t States like Oregon and Washington begging for low cost housing or more diversity? White liberals…..they believe in diversity and inclusion for everyone else, but themselves.

* Good for them. Mizzou let 150 trouble makers take down their university. The insane Dartmouth liberals were terrorized and they apologized to the terrorists. Our universities have been run by the far left-wing moonbats for decades. Now the baleful glare of insanity has finally been turned back on them and they capitulate like the little punks they are. This country is doomed.

* BLM lost its chance for legitimacy after the “Hands Up Don’t Shoot” and “Gentle Giant” narrative turned out to be a fraud. I prayed they would lead the citizens of Ferguson to register, and turnout in droves for the 2014 election … put real meaning behind the chant “this is the face of democracy in Ferguson” we heard so often. The sad fact is only 128 new voters registered, and there was a drop in turnout.

Instead of meaningful action we get pseudo intellectual lectures from privileged black kids on “micro aggression”, “insensitivity”, “marginalization” calls for re-segregation through “safe spaces”, fanatical suppression of free speech and diverse ideas, and incredibly stupid demands for “policies for dealing with incidents the activists find offensive”.

* It’s about time some sensible groups began to push back against the overt racism and thuggery of BLM especially on college campuses where they are infringing on the rights of other student populations. BLM is highly organized and funded by extreme leftist groups. The demonstrations are not spontaneous and are becoming overtly hostile to white students and even very liberal white administrators. Time to call this movement what it is — overt racism seeking preferences for one racial group and discrimination against other racial groups and filled with hate speech. Time to put a stop to it.

* Blacks are allowed any kind of organized group they like and make it clear it’s for blacks, including the black caucus in congress. The minute any “white” group surfaces, it’s disgusting and racist.

* The only time a black person shows up at a mostly White event or organization is to create Chaos, intimidations and not add to any constructive discourse. They hate that they have to compete with other races on a level playing field.

* Why is it always accepted that the existence of a black student union or an Asian student union or one for women, Jews, Muslims or anyone else is the routine business of the day, but the suggestion of a white student union is immediately painted as abhorrent?

Even if you’re making the argument that “it’s simply not needed” then you have to show us why that’s a disqualifying factor.

A football team isn’t “needed” either if the goal of a university is to educate young minds and prepare them for the adult world, but pretty much every college in America has one.

* These kids may not have presented their case well but they have a point. Any non-white ethnic group can openly form an organization or social group and it’s accepted as being positive and supportive. Any social or professional group that’s white (or nearly all white) is suspected of being elitist or racist and it’s members are made to feel guilty by their association. There is regular commentary in the media that whites should “get out of their racial comfort zone” while people of other ethnicities happily self-segregate themselves. You can’t have it both ways.

Posted in Blacks, Whites | Comments Off on Whites Fight Back Against Anti-White Hostility

Life After Leaving Israel’s Ultra Orthodox Jewish Communities

VICE: Growing up as one of 12 siblings in the remote ultra-Orthodox Jewish community of Tifrach in Israel, Bar Mayer never touched a boy, went to the movies, or revealed the skin below her collarbones. When she was 17 years old, she removed her socks while scrubbing the floor at home one hot night. Her mother sent her to her room for exposing her feet.

A few weeks after this incident, Bar showed up on her brother’s doorstep in Jerusalem. He’d already broken with the community. She announced to him, “This is it. I’m not going back.” Fifteen years later, she still lives in Jerusalem. But sharing beers with me, she now wears skin-tight pants and lights a cigarette.

“You don’t go around with a sign: ‘I am ex-ultra-Orthodox,'” laughs Bar when I comment on her metamorphosis. But despite her outward appearance, she still carries her past life with her. Since leaving, she’s joined another group—the XO (ex-ultra-Orthodox) community.

The XOs are a movement of Jews in Israel and the United States united in their rejection of the ultra-Orthodox world. According to Hillel, an organization which supports people through the transition, around 1,000 people between the ages of 18 and 35 leave their communities each year. They estimate that 60 percent adopt a less stringent Jewish framework while 40 percent abandon religion altogether. With the number of XOs rising, many families ostracize those who have left. Some even “sit shiva,” which is the seven-day Jewish mourning ritual for death.

“Leaving the orthodox world basically means cutting all ties to your former world,” explains Yair Panet, a volunteer with Hillel. “Most families don’t allow any form of contact with ‘leavers.'” Bar is not dead to her parents, they speak only when necessary, a few times a year at most. The severance was painful, but Bar says she “understood that the ultra-Orthodox path was one of getting married, having kids, and staying in the community for the rest of [her] life, there was no other option.”

Many XOs are raised in total isolation from modern culture. As a result, they’ve never used the internet, watched TV, read a newspaper, or worn regular clothes. At schools in these insular communities, religious studies take precedence over basic education like math, languages, and science. Facts like evolution are denied in favor of creationism (before leaving Bar says she had not heard of a dinosaur) with up to eight hours a day spent on Jewish teachings and just two to four on secular subjects.

Posted in Abuse, Haredi, Israel | Comments Off on Life After Leaving Israel’s Ultra Orthodox Jewish Communities

Children Violated In Hancock Park?

This email is going around the Orthodox community of Los Angeles:

In addition to the letter below from the RCC, a local menahel has brought to my attention that a State Department source has credible information that there have been specific terrorist threats against the Grove although no time frame was mentioned. Please use your discretion. — Rabbi Goldberg

The following is a letter from the RCC that deserves your attention, especially parents of teenage girls:

RABBINICAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA

***IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT AND WARNING***

***REGARDING THE SAFETY OF OUR CHILDREN***

It has come to our attention that our children have been violated in local establishments in the Hancock Park/Fairfax neighborhood:

Inappropriate advances were made by an attendant at a local gas station, who admitted to victimizing numerous girls.

Highly inappropriate and flirtatious behavior between workers and our children are taking place in local markets and businesses. Workers offer free or discounted donuts, candy bars and drinks which often leads to exchanging phone numbers, sending and asking for picture messages and going very far beyond. Girls have described feeling disgusted.

We live in dangerous times and our children are vulnerable. Unassuming frum children are easy prey and succumb to the wiles of predators lurking in places that are not necessarily obvious or avoidable. The coffee, donut and bagels shops and gas stations all employ workers who develop relationships with our children. Our children have to be instructed to be cautious.

PARENTS: PLEASE TALK TO YOUR CHILDREN ABOUT THEIR SAFETY. HERE ARE SOME IMPORTANT RULES TO DISCUSS WITH YOUR CHILDREN:

DO NOT WALK ALONE. Even in our neighborhood, children are safest walking in groups of 2 or 3. There is safety in numbers.

DO NOT ACCEPT GIFTS. Giving and receiving gifts and discounts creates special relationships and expectations.

DO NOT KID AROUND OR ALLOW FLIRTATION. Interactions should be pleasant, but short.

DO NOT GO INTO ROOMS OR CORNERS. ALWAYS remain in public areas.

DO NOT APPROACH CARS that you do not absolutely recognize from afar.

NEVER ENTER ANYONE’S CAR WITHOUT PARENTAL PERMISSION.

DON’T BE AFRAID TO TELL YOUR PARENTS ABOUT ANYTHING THAT VIOLATES THE ABOVE.

THE FOLLOWING IS A CHECKLIST FOR PARENTS:

CHECK ON YOUR CHILDREN OFTEN AND REMIND THEM REGULARLY OF THESE SAFETY RULES. Ask them if any of these rules have been broken – by them or their friends.

NEVER PUNISH YOUR CHILDREN for violations – You want them to feel free to talk to you.

Ask you daughters if they experienced uncomfortable or inappropriate conversations or incidents. LET THEM KNOW IT IS NOT THEIR FAULT. Make your complaint to the authorities. Help prevent it from happening to others

THIS MESSAGE IS APPROVED BY THE RABBINICAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA AND MANY OF THE RABBONIM, PRINCIPALS AND EDUCATORS IN OUR COMMUNITY.

Posted in Abuse, RCC | Comments Off on Children Violated In Hancock Park?

Ethnic Conflicts: Their Biological Roots In Ethnic Nepotism

The late Tatu Vanhanen wrote in 2012:

The history of genocides implies that all nations have been more or less equally capable of carrying out genocides and ethnic cleansings in appropriate circumstances. Kiernan notes that the phenomenon transcends political labels: “Genocide has been associated with expanding colonialism, shrinking empires, religious communalism, atheist dictatorships, unfettered capitalism, National Socialism, Communist revolution, post- Communist nationalism, National Security militarism, and Islamist terror” (p. 37). It is remarkable that nearly all genocides have been directed against other racial or other ethnic groups.

This fact and the universality of ethnic violence throughout the
known human history implies that the roots of this behavior pattern may be in our common human nature. Kiernan does not refer to human nature. He tries to explain the ideological preoccupations of the perpetrators of genocide, extermination and genocidal massacres by racism, expansionism, agrarianism and antiquity (pp. 38, 605), but it seems to me that a more ultimate explanation can be traced to the continual struggle for existence and to our evolved disposition to ethnic nepotism. The struggle for the control of land and territory follows from the inevitable struggle for existence and scarce resources, and ethnic nepotism explains why the contenders are so often different ethnic groups.

Steven Pinker (2011) points out in his extensive historical analysis that brutal violence calculated by the number of killings per 100,000 people per year has declined dramatically as a consequence of the civilizing process. The twentieth century was not the bloodiest in history. He does not refer to ethnic violence, but it is quite probable that the relative extent of ethnic violence has also declined dramatically, although we do not have any exact statistical evidence on the extent of ethnic violence in the past centuries. It is probable that the civilizing process has reduced ethnic violence and replaced violent conflicts by more or less peaceful ethnic interest conflicts. Edward O. Wilson (2012) notes that war and genocide have been universal and eternal, but since “the end of the second World War, violent conflict between states has declined drastically… But civil wars, insurgencies, and state- sponsored terrorism continue unabated” (pp, 65-66).

So my theoretical explanation for the significance of ethnicity and ethnic groups is based on an evolutionary argumentation. Because we are bound to a ceaseless competition and struggle for scarce resources in politics and in many other forums of life and because we have an evolved tendency to nepotism and ethnic nepotism, many interest conflicts become canalized along ethnic lines in ethnically divided societies. It is natural for the members of an ethnic group to support each other in political interest conflicts. Thus ethnic nepotism provides the ultimate theoretical explanation for the significance of ethnicity and ethnic conflict. Because of its evolutionary roots, our behavioral predisposition to ethnic nepotism is shared by all human populations, although it can play a significant role only in ethnically divided societies and in relations between ethnically different nations. Thus my basic hypothesis is that the more deeply a population is ethnically divided, the more interest conflicts become canalized along ethnic lines.

The argument that our evolved behavioral predisposition to ethnic nepotism is shared by all human populations led me to hypothesize that we can expect ethnic interest conflicts in all ethnically divided societies, although the nature and intensity of such conflicts may vary greatly. The conflicts may vary from peaceful competition by legal means to utmost violence. The variation depends not only on the significance of an interest conflict but also on the available means to solve conflicts. There are intervening factors, which may increase or decrease the intensity of conflicts. Intervening factors include various cultural and situational factors, including political institutions and political leadership. The role of political institutions is
especially interesting for the reason that, in principle, it is easier to change political institutions than many other intervening factors. Depending on their nature, political institutions can help to accommodate ethnic interest conflicts or to deepen them. Here we come to the role of democracy in ethnic interest conflicts and to the impact of other environmental factors

Posted in Genocide, Race | Comments Off on Ethnic Conflicts: Their Biological Roots In Ethnic Nepotism

How About Diversity For Saudi Arabia?

saudi

Posted in Saudis | Comments Off on How About Diversity For Saudi Arabia?

Terrorism Quotient

Jayman writes:

The bulk of “terrorism” comes from one broad group of people: Muslims….

The idea is that there is a suite of behavioral traits that is more prevalent in many Muslim populations which makes them more likely to perpetrate acts of terrorism.

If there’s such a thing as a “terrorism quotient,” many Muslim populations score significantly higher than average. A big deal at extremes…

And let’s not forget Rotherham:

Report found 1,400 children abused between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham
The figure is likely to be a conservative estimate of the true scale
Victims terrorised with guns and doused in petrol and threatened with fire
More than a third of the cases were already know to agencies
Author of the report condemned ‘blatant’ failings by council’s leadership
Action blocked by political correctness as staff ‘feared appearing racist’
Majority of victims described the perpetrators as ‘Asian’ [overwhelmingly Pakistani] men
Leader of Rotherham Council has stepped down with immediate effect
No council employees will receive disciplinary action, leaders state
This illustrates that the typical WEIRDO response to these crimes – such as pointing out (correctly) that only a small fraction of all Muslims commit these crimes, as true as that is, misses the point.

What’s more there is no reason to have large populations of Muslims in Northwestern European countries. It’s one thing when a group has a historic presence in a place, like American Blacks or the long-term Mexican residents of El Norte in the U.S. do. The country is as much theirs as it is that of the Whites living there. But the Muslim populations in Europe are overwhelmingly recent immigrants.

At the very least, one would imagine that it would be prudent to stop admitting more Muslims into these countries…

In many respects, Muslim groups (especially Arab ones) are the polar opposites of Northwest Europeans. Northwestern European society is liberal, democratic, individualistic, secular, and high-trust. Arab society is illiberal, autocratic, collectivist, extremely religious, and low-trust. Social bonds in Northwestern European societies are primarily among non-relatives (at least past the nuclear family). Social bonds in Arab society are structured around kin. Institutions in NW European societies are rule-bound. Institutions in Arab societies are corrupt…

So what to do, then? First and foremost, especially for Northwestern European countries, is to stop admitting Muslims en masse into Europe.

(It’s worth mentioning that the problem is much more acute for Europe than it is for NW European diaspora nations like the U.S. or Canada. Put simply, the Atlantic Ocean is a bigger barrier than the Mediterranean Sea. Europe gets a much more representative slice of the Muslim population. By contrast, immigrants to North America tend to be more select because of the demands of making the trip. Hence, here in the States we get higher IQ, less clannish Muslims. Of course, that’s not all that rosy – a smart terrorist is a much more dangerous thing than a stupid terrorist. But North American Muslims don’t have the incredibly high crime and poverty rates European Muslims do.)

COMMENTS TO JAYMAN:

* I think it’s interesting that despite the likely high clannishness of ISIS members, they’re still able to coordinate these attacks involving many people from diverse backgrounds and ancestries. The Charlie Hebdo attack involved Algerians, a Malian, and some Middle Eastern lady.

Islam’s success in becoming a threat to the West has been based on its universal appeal to many groups and cultures. I know clannishness doesn’t mean that individuals from different races/cultural groups can’t work together, but it seems given the tendency for clannishness people to only trust family members, such a high level of coordination between very different peoples would be difficult. In general, clannishness people, to the extent they trust those outside of their family, will only extend their trust to people who act/behave/look like themselves, in a sort of in-group bias. But the success of ISIS has been based on terrorists trusting a wide range of people who are very different themselves. Do you see what I’m saying?

I posit that Islam’s appeal is that like Western secularism and Communism, it’s a unifying force for very different people from very different backgrounds, which is a necessary trait for a ideology in an increasingly globalized world.

* Given the birth rate differentials in Western Europe, if extrapolations hold, ending immigration of incompatible peoples will merely condemn this region to a slow decline–with the possibility of a threshold point that accelerates the decline–at the extreme, something like the transition from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe. Permitting immigration means much more rapid decline in civilizational functionality. Since I fail to see the benefit for anyone of another part of the world descending from civilization into barbarism–I support deportation of alien, non-contributive elements of the European population. If these people are keen to live under European rule, it would be far more beneficial to all if we recurred to the arrangements of 60 years ago. Deportation is morally superior to any other likely outcome in Europe–the worst of which would be either tyranny justified by terroristic threats or civil war. Yes, it entails force–but the imposition of Muslims upon Europeans also entails force imposed upon those who disagree with a wholly insane immigration policy.

By the way, no one ever seems to mention a peculiar irrationality embedded in this issue: these Universalists are most keen on philanthropizing the unfortunates of the world, but importing them is surely the least efficient way to do this–especially in the long run as they sabotage the foundations of their new homes by transforming them into the old homes they sought to escape.

* You do realize that Algeria provides a very good precedent for mass deportations? If Muslims can expel us from their nations, then we can do so from ours. No qualms whatsoever.

* I would have thought the obvious solution would be to stop bombing these Muslim countries, to leave their secularist regimes in power, not to create a power vacuum to be filled by the terrorists that would result in a wave of refugees now flooding Europe. In short, the solution would be to not have implemented the Zionist agenda of remaking the ME by regime changing (I mean bringing democracy) to those regimes that were deemed the Zionist project’s enemies because they were aiding the Pals to resist the brutal occupation that has lasted some 50 yrs.

But, what do I know. Maybe you HBDers are onto something with your mathematical formulas, charts, and graphs to help explain Muslim behaviour. And the terrorism quotient sounds very impressive. Very impressive, indeed.

* A few possibilities:
1. All of the people I know personally who are deep into the notion of helping refugees and other such political causes, who are casting about desperately for some sort of “purpose” to their lives, and/or are desperately depressed have no children (and no plans for them.) Two of them have fertility issues, so that’s not exactly their faults, but they act a lot like all the others.

A person with five children is BUSY with the every day minutia of keeping their children alive. Breakfast on the table, clothes on the bodies, shoes on the feet, lunches in the backpacks, noses wiped, everyone out the door to school/the playground/piano what-have-you. These people do not have time to have existential breakdowns over how they’re not making the world an SJW paradise fast enough or “what is my purpose in life?” because they know their purpose in life is to feed five hungry humans as soon as they get home from school. The ennui that strikes my childless friends and acquaintances is a completely unfamiliar, unknown beast in my household, as I never run out of things to do.

2. A country that produces an excess of people must either ramp up its internal economic production, or send those excess people elsewhere. (Or let them all die, I guess.) The countries that are net exporters of people have high birth rates; the countries that are net importers have low birth rate.

As you say, the future belongs to those who show up.

Posted in Islam, Terror | Comments Off on Terrorism Quotient

What Makes For National Prosperity?

Jayman writes:

Here’s some of the factors that don’t matter:

Size (see Japan [large], Finland [small], and any number of small dysfunctional countries)
Diversity *per se* (e.g. Switzerland [diverse], Albania [homogenous], China [homogenous])
Resources (e.g. Arab oil states [resource rich], S. Korea [resource poor])

All that matters are two things: high average IQ, and high-trust people. You can even have several high-trust populations (e.g. Switzerland). And that’s all.

“Diversity” becomes a problem, really, only when there’s one or more clannish populations in the mix. Virtually ALL the “diversity” problems currently being experienced by Western countries is conflict between the non-clannish base populations and one [or] more clannish minorities. Switzerland manages fine with three different (relatively) non-clannish populations. So does, for that matter, Belgium and even France (Occitania – future discussion). Meanwhile, “homogenous” Italy, Albania, and Greece flounder.

Size, to the extent that it correlates with problems, only occurs because large states tend to encompass multiple populations – often clannish ones. So, trouble sometimes ensues. But size is not inherently a problem so long as the state manages to be primarily comprised of high-trust groups.

When you look around the world, you can see that average IQ and non-clannish (or at least high-trust, in the case of the Japanese and other similar “in-betweeners” – possibly includes Singapore and Taiwan) people make the difference. All the rest stem from these. These two things can explain 100% of the variance (haven’t checked, but maybe I will).

…there are no low-IQ non-clannish/high-trust populations, which are basically confined to NW Europe.

… national wealth exists in a curvilinear relationship with national IQ. There’s a massive increase in overall wealth towards the high end of the range. Looking at this high end is where we get our insight.

At this high IQ end, we note that the high economic performers are Northwestern European (or NW Euro-derived) while the low performers are Northeastern European or East Asian. That is, Eastern European and East Asian countries do considerably worse economically than comparably intelligent Northwestern European countries.

…an advanced, modern society needs not only smart people to be the innovators and the facilitators, but it also needs a climate of trust that makes doing business possible and more frictionless. The NW European societies (and a few others, such as the Japanese) have these qualities and prosper in today’s world. The rest, not so much. These nations will continue to improve, but they will never match Western levels in either development or national stability. Only time will tell if the very qualities that make NW European societies so successful, such as high-trust and a penchant for altruism ultimately end up doing them in, since they continue to import people from these less successful corners of the world.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on What Makes For National Prosperity?

Orthodox Union says let Syrian refugees in as House votes for constraints

I heard one Jew gripe about the below: “Think of all the federal security money OU congregations will get after a couple of isolated incidents. Also incidents are good for Kiruv!”

WASHINGTON (JTA) — The Orthodox Union joined an array of Jewish groups in urging the United States to “get to yes” on admitting Syrian refugees.

The O.U. statement on Thursday came as the U.S. House of Representatives voted 289-137 for a law that would increase the stringency applied existing restrictions on the refugees.

The Orthodox Union represents the second major stream of Judaism to favor bringing in 10,000 Syrian refugees over the next year, as proposed by the Obama administration. Earlier this week, the Union for Reform Judaism was among 81 organizations, including 11 Jewish groups, that signed a letter urging Congress members to allow the administration’s plan to proceed.

In its statement, the O.U. emphasized its understanding of those who ask for strict vetting procedures, encouraging “a sensible process of reviewing and enhancing security,” but said it should not be a pretext for keeping out the refugees.

“While security concerns must be paramount, our focus as a nation should be on ‘getting to yes,’” the statement said.

Like other Jewish groups, the O.U. invoked the plight of Jewish refugees from Nazi Europe.

“Just a few decades ago, refugees from the terror and violence in Hitler’s Europe sought refuge in the United States and were turned away due to suspicions about their nationality,” it said. “In fact, the Jewish immigrants that ultimately came to these shores fully adopted American values and have contributed greatly to the fabric of our great nation of immigrants.”

HIAS, the refugee advocacy group that has led Jewish activism on behalf of the Syrian refugees, condemned the House vote.

“Today’s vote is particularly baffling when you consider how well the existing process works,” it said in a statement. “Refugees are already more thoroughly vetted and screened than any other visitor to the United States.”

The Zionist Organization of America, separately, released a long compilation of arguments against allowing in the refugees, although it stopped short of outright opposing the policy.

The ZOA statement rejected claims that the Syrian refugees could be likened to Jewish refugees from Nazi Europe.

“Others have said that there is no comparison between ISIS-infiltrated Syrian refugees and past waves of refugees to America, such as the Cuban-American families of [Republican presidential candidates] Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio fleeing from [Fidel] Castro, Jewish-Americans fleeing from the Nazis, Irish-Americans fleeing from famine, and Vietnamese-Americans fleeing the Viet Cong,” it said.

There is at least one known case of a Nazi spy attempting to infiltrate the United States as a Jewish refugee. Cuba flooded the United States with released criminals in the 1980 Mariel boatlift. Transplanted gangsters from Ireland created the first organized crime network in the United States.

Posted in Immigration, Islam, Orthodox Union, Syria | Comments Off on Orthodox Union says let Syrian refugees in as House votes for constraints

My Emotional Range

I’m told I have an emotional range between Nazi commandant and a robot.

Chaim Amalek: “I’ve met Luke on numerous occasions and in varied settings. This is an act. He is one of the most emotional men I’ve ever met, especially when he is davening. That’s why the modern orthodox are so embarrassed by him that they don’t want him around.”

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on My Emotional Range

South Africa: 49 Murders a Day

Chaim Amalek: “Nebech! As compelling an argument as can be made for allowing any South African refugee from violence who wants it a place in the USA or Germany.”

REPORT: In what some politicians have described as a “war zone,” the murder rate in South Africa has risen to 49 every day—averaging out at 2 every hour, statistics released by the police in that country have revealed.

According to the report “Crime Statistic of Republic of South Africa” issued by the South African Police Service (SAPS), 17,805 people were killed in the 12 months between April 2014 and March 2015.

This reflects an increase of 4.6 percent over the previous year, when 17,023 murders took place.

The province of Gauteng, which includes the world-known cities of Johannesburg and Pretoria, registered the highest percentage increase in the murder rate, some 10.4 percent. In 2014/2015, 3,671 people were murdered in that province, up by 346 murders from the 2013/2014 period.

The eastern seaboard province of KwaZulu-Natal registered the highest number of murders with a total of 3,810. That province has registered the highest number of murders per annum for the last ten years.

“17,805 is a number I would expect from a country at war,” said Dianne Kohler Barnard, shadow police minister of the main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance.

Armed robberies, carjacking, and burglaries also increased, showing the country “lacks clear strategies to reverse this dangerous trend,” Gareth Newham, of the Institute for Security Studies thinktank, told media.

“That robberies have increased raises questions about the extent to which police resources are being effectively used. With some of the best technology in the world, and more than 194,000 personnel, the South African police service should be better able to reduce crimes such as robbery.”

More than 50,000 sexual offences were reported to South African police last year, but the number of sexual victims willing to report these crimes has dropped by 21 percent from 2011 to 2014, according to a survey carried out by Statistics South Africa.

This is largely due to increasing levels of corruption and mistrust in the authorities, a phenomena which is common to many Third World countries.

Posted in Africa, Crime, South Africa | Comments Off on South Africa: 49 Murders a Day