German Feminists: Forget Rapist Migrants, They’re Already Marginalised

Breitbart: In the wake of the wave of organised sexual assaults perpetrated against German women on New Year’s Eve, many commentators have been patiently waiting for the feminist reaction to this grotesque display of male violence. Well, it seems to have arrived, but not in the way you might imagine.

“No one is talking about the fact that this is happening to women every day,” claimed Tanja, an activist who organised a protest outside the ‘Multi Kulti’ centre in the Colonel neighbourhood of Mülheim, just a few kilometres from the station where the attacks occurred.

“People are insisting on making this a political story, trying to shift the focus on pro or anti refugees. But in fact, no one is listening to what we have to say – the women – who suffered from this violence in the streets on a daily basis long before refugees even came here,” the activist told DW yesterday.

Tanja said the “Multi Kulti” centre was a great place for people of all culture to get together: Turks, Syrians and other migrants and Germans. From her feminist perspective, the real problem causing German women to suffer is “German-born” men and the long standing western rape culture, which they uphold.

“Because refugees are now a burning topic, the media all of a sudden report about these events, but what nobody wants to admit is that these things happen all the time.

“I’m sorry to break this to you, but German-born men also harass and rape”, she exclaimed.

The activist explained that she had several close friends who were at the central station while the attacks took place. “Even they told me that they don’t want the debate to become a refugee topic again. This is yet again to talk over our heads, to ignore our reality”, she said.

“Sure, politicians are trying to hijack this attack for their own purposes. Some of them want to create refugees quotas, others want to increase the amount of asylum seekers – and these poles also exist among the German public”, she claimed.

Adding: “And it’s a positive thing at the end of the day that you get these opinions which balance each other. But you know who is forgotten at the end of the day. Women themselves. The ones who will experience this also after the media hype is over.”

The reaction of the Feminist establishment media here in the UK has been equally misconceived and mealy mouthed.

Posted in Feminism, Germany, Islam, Rape | Comments Off on German Feminists: Forget Rapist Migrants, They’re Already Marginalised

NYT: Jewish Deportee on Persecution, Past and Present

I can understand why a healthy nation would not want citizens who are so ambivalent, when not downright hostile to it. Every nation has the right to the attitude — love it here or leave.

Members of tribes, including Jews, have a different relationship to the nation state than Anglos and Nordics. If you are tribal, your primary loyalty is to your tribe and everyone else is likely to fail to live up to your standards. That’s basic social identity theory. If you strongly belong to one group, you’ll shape reality so that your group is the best and other groups suck.

There’s nothing about surviving a genocide, such as the Holocaust, that imparts wisdom. You don’t become more moral by surviving death camps. You simply become what is now known as a survivor.

This woman survived the Holocaust but she has little wisdom to share.

Steven Erlanger writes in the New York Times:

Ms. Loridan-Ivens, who has now written a memoir of her childhood experience in Auschwitz-Birkenau and her effort afterward to find a reason to live, has been provocative before. She shocked France after the Charlie Hebdo killings when she went on France Inter radio, in what was supposed to be a discussion of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, and accused France of indifference to a new anti-Semitism.

The French president, François Hollande, had called a huge rally in support of the values of the French Republic after the January killings. But, Ms. Loridan-Ivens asked, “do you believe the French would have gone into the streets if only Jews had been killed?” The interviewer was reduced to silence.

In an interview in December in her Left Bank apartment, where she lives alone after the death of her second husband in 1989, she noted that previous killings of French Jews, for instance by Mohammed Merah in Toulouse in 2012, brought little reaction from the French public.

The memoir, “But You Did Not Come Back,” will be published in English this month by Atlantic Monthly Press. It takes the form of a letter to her murdered father, Szlhama (Schloïme) Froim Rozenberg, a Polish Jew who came to France in 1919 in search of freedom.

They were arrested together in 1943. She remembers him telling her, when they were at the Drancy internment camp in April 1944, awaiting transport to hell, “You will come back, perhaps, because you’re young, but I will not come back.”

She writes to her dead father, who thought he could assimilate by buying a chateau in the countryside: “You had chosen France, she isn’t the melting pot you’d hoped for. Everything is getting tense again. We’re called ‘French Jews’; there are also French Muslims, and here we are face-to-face — I who had hoped never to take sides, or at least, to simply be on the side of freedom.”

She feels French, she said in her memento-filled apartment, but has “a very complicated relationship” with France. “It’s the country that returned my father to his birthplace, Poland,” to die. “I can’t say that I’m disappointed with France — I lost any illusions a very long time ago.”

Ms. Loridan-Ivens said she appreciated that France protected her but wished she had no need of such protection.

For her parents, she said, France meant liberty, equality, fraternity. “They escaped Eastern Europe because they wanted freedom, to be able to go to school and university,” she said. “In France there was no pogrom. Life was tough, as they arrived penniless, but they worked hard, they wanted their children to go to school and become French.”

But then came the occupation, and the betrayal. After the war, the family received a death notice from the government saying that her father had “died for France.” But he died “because he was Jewish,” Ms. Loridan-Ivens said. As she wrote to her father: “You did not really die for France. France sent you to your death. You were wrong about her.”

After the war, Charles de Gaulle “said that the arrests of Jews had been done by the Germans, but it was a lie,” she said. “The French gave lists of Jews to the Germans and participated in the arrests. I was arrested by both.”

Also in the aftermath, she said she tried to kill herself twice; her sister and brother later committed suicide. After multiple examinations in the camps by Josef Mengele and others, when she had to strip naked, she never again felt comfortable with her body, she said.

“It’s as if it still bears the mark of the first man who ever looked at me, a Nazi,” she said. For a long time, “I associated getting undressed with death, with hatred, with the icy stare of Mengele,” who decided who would live and die.

Ms. Loridan-Ivens married soon after the war, to Francis Loridan, a civil engineer who traveled for his work; the marriage quickly deteriorated, as did her adherence to the French Communist Party, which she joined for about six months. But she felt the need to testify, somehow, and she was a key figure in a film made in 1960, “Chronicle of a Summer,” where she talked about the camps.

In 1962 she was a director of a controversial film, “Algeria, Year Zero,” and that year met an older and politically engaged Dutch filmmaker, Joris Ivens, and fell in love. Together, they made films about Communist China and North Vietnam, a devotion she now regards, said with a laugh, as “false, naïve and simplistic.”

Posted in Holocaust | Comments Off on NYT: Jewish Deportee on Persecution, Past and Present

Trump as a Pool Shark Hustling the Media

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Bum hunting is the media’s preferred tactic of fighting the culture war too: Westboro Baptist, that Starbucks cup controversy guy, Dylann Roof, etc.

That’s one of the funner angles on Trump. He walks, talks and acts like a bum, which draws the media to him like piranhas every time he wades into the pool, but he beats them every time. But they are so convinced that he’s a bum that they keep on coming after him. He’s the perfect hustler.

* The media cover Trump, I think, because he’s ‘newsworthy’: his statements, his behavior, his very existence outrage and offend the majority. And since they’re outraged in a manner which causes them to want to know more, he’s covered extensively, because he raises the ratings / sells the papers / generally brings in attention and money.

He’s the political equivalent of clickbait; if he didn’t exist, the media would be forced to create him.

He gets coverage for the same reason the serious problems facing our civilization don’t get coverage – the only principle the media venerate is “give the masses what they want” – with the implied corollary “don’t give the masses what they don’t want”.

If the majority of German’s citizenry really wanted to know the effects of their immigration policy, not only would the censorship fail, the government wouldn’t even be trying to impose it. Most people don’t want to know, and therefore it’s worth the government’s while to try to keep the facts out of their awareness.

Same phenomenon here in America, if less overt.

* Sometimes he even says things that sound frankly dubious (“getting schlonged is a perfectly normal expression in New York politics”), that inevitably turns out to be 100 percent correct. Yet all the little Noahs and Madisons who work for the dominant press, just can’t conceive of the existence of an unPC, older White man who is smarter than they are, and so they keep falling for it, time and time again. And I don’t think they’re adaptable enough to break out of that pattern before Election Day.

* Trump is having a positive impact on the whole political culture. The Governor of Maine just told the truth in a speech, saying that gangsta thugs are coming to his state and impregnating the girls and then leaving. Without Trump, this governor never would have had the courage.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump as a Pool Shark Hustling the Media

Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Wants To Restrict Speech

BY TZIPI HOTOVELY:

Following the Charlie Hebdo attacks in France, it became popular to cite George Bernard Shaw’s famous words: “Assassination is the extreme form of censorship.” But the continuation of the phrase, less quoted, is equally significant: “…and it seems hard to justify an incitement to it on anti-censorial principles.”

Shaw’s point is related to the well-known fact that any liberty, taken to extremes, ceases to be a liberty when it intrudes on another. As the famous adage puts it, one person’s right to swing his fist ends with another’s nose. The need to define online incitement and act against it, even when this involves delimiting the bounds of free speech, is a case in point.

The recent terrorist attacks that have seized world attention have a definite connection to the abuse of online platforms. As facts about the shooting of 14 people in San Bernardino emerged, it became clear the extent to which the terrorists, Tashfeen Malik and her husband, Syed Farook, had contact with terrorist elements via social networks long before carrying out their act of mass murder. Significantly, on the day of the attack, Malik pledged allegiance to ISIS in a Facebook post.

Following the November 13 attacks in Paris that killed some 130 people, it became clear that the attackers, a group of ISIS affiliates, had used social media to communicate and coordinate. It goes without saying that social media has been a very significant platform by which ISIS gained world attention to begin with, in the series of shocking beheading video clips that spread virally across the internet, starting in 2014.

Does anyone really doubt the connection between such grisly videos and the subsequent rapid spread of ISIS-affiliated terror attacks around the world?

Similarly, the wave of Palestinian terror that has been striking Israel in the last few months has been strongly influenced by online incitement. Since September 13, 2015, 24 people have been killed by Palestinian terrorists, and 259 injured, by stabbings, shootings and vehicular ramming attacks.

During this entire period, Palestinian social media has been rife with pictures, videos and explicit messages calling for such attacks against Israelis, some even containing anatomical charts explaining where on the body to stab for greatest effect.

If ever there has been a clear and imminent connection between incitement and actual violence, this latest wave of Palestinian terror is it.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is one of the best known and most celebrated statements of the principle of free speech. Yet, even this right, which is so central to democracy and freedom, has its limits.

The US Supreme Court prohibits “advocacy of the use of force” when “such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”

A similar approach has been incorporated internationally, as in Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which stipulates that “Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.”

Recognizing the prominence of the Internet as a means by which terrorists inspire, recruit, incite and train adherents, significant international cooperation and dialogue has been ongoing for many years, both bilaterally and under the auspices of multilateral bodies such as the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), in an attempt to formulate agreed criteria on what counts as incitement, and on how to fight it.

Democracies are understandably wary of limiting free speech. The dangers of taking such limitations too far are well known and need to be always kept in mind. This is especially true of the Internet and cyberspace, given its tremendous potential as a tool for empowering the underprivileged and for leveling the field between more and less developed areas and communities.

But like all technologies, the Internet can be abused. Such abuse has already turned it into a battlefield, whose victims have been vividly displayed in the recent spate of terrorist attacks we have all witnessed.

Thus, concern for free speech cannot be used as an excuse for inaction. Criteria need to be developed to separate legitimate free speech from abuses of online technologies which pose a clear and imminent threat to the lives and well-being of others.

Moreover, just as newsprint and broadcast media are expected to act responsibly by not serving as a means for inciting to violence, so too must social media platforms, and the companies which stand behind them, be bound by the same sense of social responsibility.

Innocent people are losing their lives in places as far afield as San Bernardino, Paris and Jerusalem because of violence driven by fanaticism and intolerance. Adherents of such fanaticism are resorting to different means for promoting it and for recruiting the terrorists who act on it.

Social networks and online platforms are just the latest technology through which the age-old practice of incitement to violence is being carried out today.

Responsible democratic governments need to develop the legal criteria and technical means of defining and enforcing the online boundary between free speech and incitement towards violence. Not to do so endangers the lives of innocent people and amounts to the ultimate act of censorship, by forever silencing the voices of terrorism’s victims.

Posted in Censorship, Israel | Comments Off on Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Wants To Restrict Speech

Spotlight (2015)

Comments:

* Spotlight is the most grown-up film I’ve seen in a good long while.

It ultimately serves as an indictment (presented in the most humane manner imaginable) of the gradual atomization of our best and brightest (which is how the journalists are depicted) from the social ties that once kept them connected to the common life of the community.

It finally dawns on Keaton that everyone knew but him, and the lawyer for the church (his lifelong friend) asks him, “why didn’t you?”

It was his job, after all.

The unspoken answer: because he’d fallen away from the church that raised him, as did all the other journalists who were the last to know. Throughout the film, there’s a longing for that lost connection.

Posted in Abuse, Hollywood, Journalism | Comments Off on Spotlight (2015)

Steve Sailer: Bumhunting as the Economic Paradigm of the 21st Century

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Bum hunting is the media’s preferred tactic of fighting the culture war too: Westboro Baptist, that Starbucks cup controversy guy, Dylann Roof, etc.

That’s one of the funner angles on Trump. He walks, talks and acts like a bum, which draws the media to him like piranhas every time he wades into the pool, but he beats them every time. But they are so convinced that he’s a bum that they keep on coming after him. He’s the perfect hustler.

* I do math for casino games professionally. I prefer beating the casino to bumhunting, you don’t have to feel guilty about that and there are a lot of games that can be beaten if you do the scouting for opportunities and the practice. Card counting blackjack is the best known form of advantage play and the only one you don’t have to scout for, but it’s a terrible grind. There are many opportunities but I earn much better money as a math consultant than I would as an advantage player.

The difference between advantage play and cheating is a fine line — counting cards is OK but using a computer for it is illegal, catching a peek at a sloppy dealer’s down card is OK but stationing a confederate behind the dealer out of the ordinary play area to signal you is cheating, observing irregularities and asymmetries in playing cards that have not been handled skilfully is OK but marking or crimping the cards is illegal, finding a biased roulette wheel is OK but sneaking your bet after the cutoff is cheating, figuring out that progressive jackpots have made a slot machine temporarily positive is OK but kicking the power strip or tilting the machine so no one else can play it while you go to bed is cheating, etc.

I have no emotional connection to gambling, and I won’t play a game where the odds are against me. The problem with poker is you don’t know how good your opponents are, and the odds are never mathematically in your favor, but it is certainly the best way to make a living as a gambler. I have always said that by far the most important skill for a poker player, much more valuable than a memory or math skills or strategic theory or money management or keeping a poker face, is simply finding people to play with who aren’t as good as you.

Online poker can be done securely in theory, but there have been too many examples of cheating and theft by insiders. In the fantasy sports games, there is extreme ignorance about how much of a game of skill it is. In poker, it’s harder to dismiss continual losses as bad luck, so if bumhunting works there, it should work even better at fantasy sports. Anyone who would condemn it just because better players win and worse players lose has no understanding whatsoever of what gambling is. (On the other hand, cheating and theft by insiders should be treated very harshly.)

* I read the book The Sting was based on, David Maurer’s The Big Con: The Story of the Confidence Man. One of his interesting observations is that con artists themselves are generally easy to con, as was depicted in The Sting when the Redford character quickly loses his money to a rigged roulette wheel. Maurer said that few con artists were able to hold onto their winnings for long.

* “Almost all the great popular sports of the world come from Britain. But what Britain has not been able to export is the amateur ethos of the game. Most foreigners, and now many Britons, want to win at any cost within the rules; and they keep to the rules only because a game without rules is war.”

– John Fowles, The Aristos, 9:68

* I think it is no surprise that traditional western Christian culture frowned on, if not prohibited things like usury and gambling. There was an understanding that there needed to be limits on the bright being able to take advantage of the dim, lest it undercut the society, and gambling and usury or clearly great methods to take money from the weak minded. It is really no different than the belief that men should not take advantage of women, children or the elderly because they are weaker. This was recognized as behaving in a civilized manner.

Posted in America, Donald Trump, Gambling | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Bumhunting as the Economic Paradigm of the 21st Century

Maine’s governor: Out-of-state drug dealers like “D-Money” are impregnating white girls

NEWS: Speaking on the opioid painkiller and heroin epidemic in Maine, Gov. Paul LePage, a Republican, made an unbelievably racist remark at a town hall on Wednesday:

These are guys with the name D-Money, Smoothie, Shifty. These types of guys, they come from Connecticut and New York. They come up here, they sell their heroin, then they go back home. Incidentally, half the time they impregnate a young, white girl before they leave, which is a real sad thing because then we have another issue that we got to deal with down the road.

The comment, surfaced by Get Right Maine, plays on clear racial overtones by using names typically attributed to black culture and rap, and suggests that black people are outsiders, criminals, drug dealers, and rapists that take advantage of young, white women. (This racial trope in the war on drugs goes back to at least the late 19th century and early 20th century, when local, state, and federal lawmakers pushed drug laws by suggesting that minority people would lure and harm young white women with drugs.)

Studies show white and black Americans use and sell drugs at similar rates, although African Americans are much more likely to be arrested for drug possession. So there are simply no statistics to back the governor’s implications.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Maine’s governor: Out-of-state drug dealers like “D-Money” are impregnating white girls

Is it time to ban pit bulls, rottweilers, presa canarios, cane corsos, mastiffs, dogo argentinos, fila brasieros, sharpeis, boxers, and their mixes?

Tweet: “This is extremely racist. These dogs must be biting people because they are poor and lack opportunities.”

REPORT: Each day, about 1,000 U.S. citizens require emergency care treatment for dog bite injury.1 The following studies examine injury occurrence and the dog breeds most likely to bite.
Dog Attack Deaths and Maimings, U.S. & Canada, September 1982 to December 31, 2014
By compiling U.S. and Canadian press accounts between 1982 and 2014, Merritt Clifton, editor of Animals 24-7, shows the dog breeds most responsible for disfiguring injuries and deaths.
The combination of molosser breeds, including pit bulls, rottweilers, presa canarios, cane corsos, mastiffs, dogo argentinos, fila brasieros, sharpeis, boxers, and their mixes, inflict:
86% of attacks that induce bodily harm
81% of attacks to children
89% of attack to adults
76% of attacks that result in fatalities
86% that result in maiming
Embody 9.2%+ of the total dog population

Posted in Crime | Comments Off on Is it time to ban pit bulls, rottweilers, presa canarios, cane corsos, mastiffs, dogo argentinos, fila brasieros, sharpeis, boxers, and their mixes?

Wake Up America!

CYJbZarWEAE0F9T

femin

america

* “This is extremely racist. These dogs must be biting people because they are poor and lack opportunities.”

dogs

Posted in America, Islam | Comments Off on Wake Up America!

‘Intelligence can be measured directly from brain scans, without tests of any sort.’

REPORT: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies typically collapse data from many subjects, but brain functional organization varies between individuals. Here we establish that this individual variability is both robust and reliable, using data from the Human Connectome Project to demonstrate that functional connectivity profiles act as a ‘fingerprint’ that can accurately identify subjects from a large group. Identification was successful across scan sessions and even between task and rest conditions, indicating that an individual’s connectivity profile is intrinsic, and can be used to distinguish that individual regardless of how the brain is engaged during imaging. Characteristic connectivity patterns were distributed throughout the brain, but the frontoparietal network emerged as most distinctive. Furthermore, we show that connectivity profiles predict levels of fluid intelligence: the same networks that were most discriminating of individuals were also most predictive of cognitive behavior. Results indicate the potential to draw inferences about single subjects on the basis of functional connectivity fMRI.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on ‘Intelligence can be measured directly from brain scans, without tests of any sort.’