The Future of the Republican Party Is By the Pool At the Biltmore?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I wonder if Hillary watches Rubio flailing around and has 2nd thoughts about elevating Castro to VP?

He makes Rubio look bright & competent in comparison & has even fewer accomplishments.

* Just start building it with the Army Corps of Engineers using his authority to defend the borders given him in the Constitution. Then see if anybody in Congress has the guts to demand that work stop on the wall.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Future of the Republican Party Is By the Pool At the Biltmore?

Why Trump: Luke Ford Explains It All

Kathy Shaidle writes: “I’ve started reading Luke Ford again, which is probably a mistake, but still. (He seems to be courting Steve Sailer now the way he used to court Denis Prager…)

Link:

This isn’t precisely a ‘psychology’ related blog. Then again, it kinda is. The main thing is we can’t keep clogging the same two folders with Trump threads.

I can’t keep the “Luke Ford” thing straight in my head. Are there two of them? Or two Luke Ford sites? Anyway, one gained notoriety as the blog of a Midwestern Jewish-convert porn-movie reporter, but then suddenly he’d renounced smut and had this other, completely non-porn blog, while somebody else kept his old site running as by that time “Luke Ford” was practically an acronym for porn movies.

All irrelevant preamble; this rambles a bit, as most blogs do, but his summation of Why Trump via the example of Japan is simple, brilliant and as on-point as you’ll find anywhere.

Rubio reminds me of a tiny gay dog, yipping and yapping.

Posted on February 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

If Trump wins, the Republican elites (and the non-Republican elites) lose. They’re exposed.

* “Do you realize that If Bernie Sanders wins, it will be the first time that a Jewish family moved into public housing that was left vacant by a black family?”

* There is genuine vitriol in this race.

In earlier races, there were some cons who supported McCain, some who supported Romney, some who supported Perry, some who supported etc, etc, etc.

But there was no conviction, no fire, thus no real animus. Just polite going through the motions.

Romney supporters didn’t hate McCain supporters and vice versa.
Santorum supporters didn’t hate Huckabee supporters and vice versa.

But there is genuine hatred among the various factions.

Trump supporters really hate the other camps and vice versa.

But I don’t think it’s really populism vs populism, e.g. masses who support Trump vs masses who support Rubio.

While there are masses who support Rubio or others, they do so without passion.

In contrast, there is mass passion for Trump.

The real passion is between masses for Trump and ELITES for Rubio (and others).

Masses for Trump really hate the GOP elites, the elites who support Rubio(and others) really hate Trump masses.

I think the GOP elites fear Trump for professional reasons(as for other ones).
If Trump ignores all their advice and still wins, it will mean that all the experts have been phony and useless quacks who’ve been raking it in and holding power for no good reason at all.

* I live in Asia and when an Asian asks me about why Trump is popular, this is a way I use to explain it.

If you really want to understand Trump’s appeal, just look at the fact that 45% of US citizens don’t pay taxes because they don’t make enough due to jobs increasingly being low-level service work with many of the higher level jobs being taken by H1B.

Then combine it with this scenario – imagine the head of Japan announces:
1. Japan is opening its borders and plans to make the majority of the country Chinese and Muslims
2. Japanese privilege classes will begin in all schools to combat Japanese racism and the country will begin eliminating Japanese cultural events as non-inclusive
3. Japanese will pay more taxes to subsidize these workers who for the most part won’t be pay taxes
4. Crime and terrorism will go up but that is unavoidable and Xenophobic to mention
5. When any business employs a majority of Japanese ethnics, there will be a discussion of the “Japanese problem”
6. Preferences will be given in hiring to the newcomers
7. Any negative comments about what is going on will be clamped down on because if you don’t like this cultural cleansing you are Hitler.

Now, honestly ask yourself how the Japanese would react to this plan? Add those two together and it gives you an idea of why people are backing Trump.

After that, they all say they understand his appeal and would never let that type of scenario develop in their own country.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Why Trump: Luke Ford Explains It All

The Fecund City

Steve Sailer writes: After reading the book by Gagnon, Laumann, et al, I wrote to Gagnon’s co-author Edward O. Laumann and proposed they write a sequel to The Social Organization of Sexuality that could be entitled The Sexual Organization of Society.

I used my not very lurid life in Chicago as an example of how sex organizes cities geographically. In fact, I pointed out, the academic jargon term “construction” deserved to be taken more literally because much of the immense investment in construction in Chicago existed for sex-related reasons.

In 1982 when I got my MBA at UCLA and got a job offer from a downtown Chicago marketing research firm, I asked a friend in Santa Monica who had recently lived in Chicago where the prettiest girls in Chicago lived because I wanted to rent an apartment near them.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* You are a pig. The only way this post could possibly be more alarming is if you had asked, where are the prettiest white girls.

* Kinsey, of course, conducted his “survey” on prostitutes, shirt-lifters, the sexually diseased and felons.
You know, Democrats.

* Quite a bit of human behavior is focused around having sex, or achieving the result of sex, namely, children. And since having sex and having children doesn’t happen in a vacuum, but instead in a social setting, it should be obvious that there will be different social, cultural, and sexual rules in different places and at different times. As we used to say in the ’60′s, Duh.

Actually, the most interesting thing about the “performative” thesis, either in this telling, or in Judith Butler’s telling, is that it tends to undercut this entire notion that our sexual history is pre-engraved in our DNA.

Above and beyond all this pie in the sky nonsense, there are only a few ranges to human sexual conduct: either we are going to act like primates or we are going to act like the society around us, or else we are going to draw on our cultural history and find better models. The primate model is promiscuous and frankly disadvantageous to lady primates, and the current social sexual models are probably not very good for women, either. So where do we go from here? That is up to each individual.

One thing that is interesting to me is that our culture has, for a long time, evaluated a man’s virtue by his interest in engaging in perpetual copulation. I submit that is strange.

* Men who wait until their married to have sex, or otherwise constrain their animal instincts, aren’t doing so out of a lack of interest. It takes a lot of social sanction to overcome the natural self when it comes to sex.

* If you meet someone in the workplace and you are a heterosexual male, it is built into the operating system that you will note their sexual attractiveness and that this will have some effect on future interactions, since usually people who perceive each other as sexually attractive will be nicer to each other, even if they have absolutely no intention of consummating the relationship.

In popular culture women are nearly always sexually attractive unless they are playing roles that call for them to be unattractive, like Roseanne, for example. Lena Dunham, although I have never seen her TV show, is known for turning the paradigm around as an ugly woman who has sex with a lot of men, but apparently this is a comedy. (I don’t think I want to see this show.) Usually it is necessary for the lead woman to be sexually attractive to maximize advertising revenue or movie attendances.

* Social Construction of Sex and Sexual Construction of City are confused because the very hip/hot places where men find women(and vice versa) also tend to be homo-heavy and ideologically libby.

Homos often form communities in nice hip parts of cities. They also cater to glamour, fashion, and night-life. So, even much of ‘hetero’ social culture is interwoven with homo presence.

And of course, guys like to take girls out to fancy and hip cultural stuff, and that often means theater or some such, and those have long been dominated by fruiters and feminists. So, for a guy to impress his girl, he might take her to some play written by homos or feminists. Imagine that.

I used to drive around with friends the area Sailer is talking about. It was surreal cuz you’d go from hip male/female clubs to homo clubs. You’d see men and women dressed up to look hip and cool, and then you’d see a bunch of homos.

* We sure have come a long way from Age of Jane Austen. People now jump in the sack much faster.

But it’s true enough that social setting counts for a lot, and much of that happens in that setting is more about status than sex, or it’s about status-for-sex.

And fancier parts of city matter cuz that’s where men and women(especially men) can show off that they are not meater-men but men of sociability, success, culture, knowledge, and all-the-stuff-considered-fashionable.
After all, even a hillbilly in some run-down village can say “I wanna hump you.” Anyone can do that.

It is in the social setting that a man can show off that there is more to him than just ‘sex appeal’.
This is why Travis Bickle blew it big time by taking the woman to a porno movie in TAXI DRIVER. It was socially and culturally so low.
These days, however, maybe a woman won’t mind so much. Even some stuff on TV that girls watch is pretty porny. And Emma Sulkowicz… sheesh.

LAST DAYS OF DISCO is interesting movie about how men and women use all sorts of cultural signaling to impress others. Status-for-sex. Homo-ish world with Liberal elite signaling.

In a strange way, the straight male has to be sort of ‘gay-ish’ in signaling to the straight woman. If a straight woman has a homo friend, he wouldn’t be interested in her body. He would try to impress her in other ways that seems fancier and more cultured. Or since HE would not be interested in her sexually, he would prioritize the subject of what she wants and needs that what he wants or needs. Homos make women feel like they are the center of the world, which is why fashion is about homos making up womenfolk. Ho’s go for that, and that is why hipster guys have that metrosexual side.

But the old way was best. That was when fathers brought up boys and girls right.
Stuff like virginity mattered. It was valued as something to save for that special someone.
Nowadays, it’s disposed of as soon as possible. Sexual culture is all about casualness than consequence-ness.
So, if a girl is kissing a guy, she could be kissing lips that’s been licking who-knows-how-many-pooters. It’d be like indirect cunnilingus for the woman.
OR if a guy kisses a girl, he could be kissing lips that sucked who knows how many meaters? It’d be like indirect blowjob.

This is progress? For most of human history, people looked down on this stuff for good reason.
But we are supposed to pretend we are more progressed cuz men now do indirect blowjobs and women do indirect cunnilingus.

That is so ewwww.

The beginning of GODFATHER when Bonasera says he taught his daughter to never dishonor the family. Now, that is good stuff.
Or the ending of GODFATHER II where everyone is dressed respectable. Guys don’t have tattoos. And Connie is dressed proper. Not like a whore.

Indeed, THE GODFATHER is like a horror movie where people who have illicit sex get killed. Sonny fooled around, so he got killed. Carlo fooled around and he got killed. Fredo fooled around in Las Vegas, so he got killed. Tataglia the pimp got killed. Geary didn’t get killed but he got blackmailed.

Vito and Michael remain true to their women, and they live.

I just noticed the final scene of Godfather II is sort of like the scene in Cuba where the big shots sitting at the table are introduced one by one.
It’s like Michael went a long way from the idealist and member of family to a shark among sharks.

Well, people are more casual about sex these days because of birth control. That’s pretty clear.

But on the whole, nothing has changed. Thoughtless young women are looking for hunks who will protect them, and thoughtless young men are looking for the prettiest girl. As they age, women are looking for good providers, and men are looking for — the prettiest girl who will put out the most in the sack.

So men “display”, and so do women. Again, nothing has changed.

In my experience, I was turned off by women who were difficult to talk to, or who had had multiple abortions. But then, I wanted children. In retrospect, I realize I was also turned off by short unintelligent women — no matter how good looking they were — because I was instinctively thinking of the progeny we would produce.

It ‘s not easy to find someone you can talk to, who laughs at your jokes, who has compatible values concerning how to live, how to keep a home, pets, children, food, household tasks, and who can at least respect your occupational and intellectual interests. Sex is pretty far down that list: not that sex isn’t important, it’s rather that for most people sex isn’t that complicated.

* This is what is special about Whit Stillman movies.

His characters are not exactly prudes or prigs — some are — , but they intuitively understand that meaning comes from form, manners, style, honor, duty, obligation, and etc. Emotions and behavior have to be interwoven with such ideas. Otherwise, there is just sloppy gloppiness. And once this becomes the norm, it especially hits the lower orders really bad. UK is a wasteland among the former working class.
I’ve seen so many ruined lives among hornball lower classes of ALL races. And when you think of kids of these trash parents growing up to garbage pop culture, it’s really dispiriting.

Too much thinking about propriety is sort of limp, like with the four-eyed character in METROPOLITAN who is something of a dullard.

Folks gotta navigate between dull nice guy and debased ero-maniac.

All this sexual liberation stuff turned out to be a dead end.

It’s like the guy and girl talking about ‘balling’ in WOODSTOCK which is just ewwwww.
The hitchhiker couple just sound like a couple of slobs.
Or girls acting like Lena Dunham or communicating like Emma Suckowitz: “fuc* me in the butt.” The sex scene in Tiny Furniture is like a farmboy going to do it with sheep. It’s just debased.

I mean what the hell with Sulkowicz? All the nuttier when her parents are well-educated academics.
Can you imagine CASABLANCA where Bogart opens the note in the rain and reads, ‘fuc* me in the butt’?
Or imagine the scene in LOVE STORY where Jenny admits she cares. Suppose she said ‘Oliver, fuc* me in the butt’ instead.

Or imagine the scene in IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE where George and Mary are singing ‘Buffalo Gals’. Would it be progress if they were singing ‘Anaconda’ instead and if Mary were ‘twerking’?

What the hell has happened to our culture?

The end result of ‘sexual liberation’ is just people acting like animals.

It’s like food. Just pigging out like a glutton is a dead end. It’s just animal behavior.

Food becomes an ‘art’ and culture with proper forms and methods.

Men need to civilized wild girls, women need to civilize wild boys.

But we have wild girls and wild boys who talk and act like X-rated versions of Pixar characters. That’s another thing. If these people were at least adult in their emotions, their vulgarity might have some gravitas… like in LAST TANGO IN PARIS where the pain is real.
But today’s hookup culture is like Pixar cartoon characters having sex. Boys stop maturing after 13, girls after 14.

I like how Stillman used mental illness or imbalance as a kind of metaphor for problems of human nature as a whole. Some of his characters are quirky, eccentric, just borderline nuts. But how they do remain sane and maintain some kind of equilibrium? Because they do care about ideals and principles such as honor, faith, loyalty, and etc. Without such stuff, the borderline ‘loon’ in LAST DAYS OF DISCO might totally lose it.
Same with the woman in DAMSELS IN DISTRESS. Her ideas about love and stuff keep her busy and occupied enough to not lose herself to total nuttery.
I love the movie GHOST WORLD and never tire of it, but it is about the dead end life of a girl who chooses a life of WHATEVER.
A kind of hell. NO way to live.

Truffaut was something of a delinquent out-of-control and was abandoned by his parents. But Andre Bazin took him under his wing and did much to develop his mind and talent. And Truffaut become someone.
His film WILD CHILD is prolly a tribute to Bazin.

But what kind of world do we have now?

Immigrant kids come to France, and they are turned extra-savage by American black rap culture. Look at shows like Dunham’s GIRLS, look at whores like Miley Cyrus, listen to standup comics, and etc, and it seems like the current culture is invested in turning young people into savages instead of turning young savages into civilized and cultured adults.

We have thug music, pornified mainstream culture. Much of today’s TV shows would have been X-rated in 70s. It makes LAST TANGO look tame.
Every idiot vlogger sounds like Portnoy.

This isn’t good, especially for EU as millions more young men from africa and middle east are headed there. Cologne mess is just a prelude.

What passes for higher morality today? ‘gay marriage’ and trannies are ‘women’.

And then, there are all these Angry Slave Movies. Just when we need to rein in the black craziness and tell them stop acting violent, these movies like DJANGO, 12 YRS A NEGRO, and the new BIRTH OF NATION will just make blacks feel justified in their nuttery.
The past will be used to justify current black rage.

When babies are young, we don’t say NATURAL is good. Diapers have to be changed and kids have be potty-toilet trained. Controlling natural processes is what being human is about. We also teach table manners. ANIMAL HOUSE behavior is not proper eating.

And there was a time when sexuality was handled like potty-training.
At a certain age, hormones kick in, and teens have to encouraged to control their urges and seek meaningful relationships whereby sex is made meaningful.

But now, we don’t horny-train the teens anymore. We tell to them go with Nature, which is like telling young children to never learn toilet-training and just shi* all over.

So, we have ‘twerking’ as culture. We have dance where young people dance like they’re screwing. We have teachers having sex with students like school is some sex club.

All gonna end badly.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on The Fecund City

‘Super Trump: It’s Breakfast In America Again’

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* With Trump in position to probably clean up in the North and Northeast (with Kasich the only halfway real question mark in the Midwest), and Cruz spoiling in the South and Southwest, Floridian Rubio is left without much of a regional base of support. He was polling half-decently in Virginia (unsurprisingly, being the local address of Beltway Republicanism) as little as a week ago, now not really anywhere. And he’s losing to Trump by between 15 and 20 points even in Florida (2 weeks after Super Tuesday).

* This is a sign of some really big support for Trump. It’s an endorsement that carries a lot of weight. And Governor Christie can really help by crushing the opposition. Maybe Senator Rubio just bit off more than he could chew.

In related news, just breaking this afternoon, Governor Paul LePage of Maine has also endorsed Donald Trump. LePage was an early supporter of Christie, with the NJ governor helping him in his own re-election. Maine’s Republican caucus is on Saturday, March 5th.

* I also saw that the Russian group Pussy Riot has endorsed Bernie Sanders. Interesting that they chose him rather than the feminist candidate, Hillary Clinton. Not sure how much gravitas that lends to the Sanders campaign, however.

* He’s certainly nailed down the male pussy vote in this country.

* Wow, Twitter has erupted with even more Trump-hate than ever! It’s like the Oxford Oath, everyone pledging to not vote for Trump whatever the outcome.

The rest of the election year promises to be very, very interesting.

* Christie would be a good AG, but a bad VP. Same with Rudy, just to a greater extent. They’re both sound on law enforcement, but terrible on foreign policy. Trump will be 70 on election day and a lightning rod for impeachment or worse.

* Another example of Steve’s “luckiest man” deux ex machina?

“Hell to the YES”

Trump had his worst debate last night by policy wonk standards. He got mussed by all the.personal mud flung his way (polish workers , trump university). Watching the blabbering mouths on CNN , FOX this.morning , the memes and debate post.mortem all articulated words to effect “Rubio won! ….Trump on his heels.”

Then Trump sucks the air out of the Rubio room with the Christie endorsement bombshell. Tremendous.

Vicente Fox then doubles down and gives Trump more ammunition with follow up on the f-bomb .

Please Donald, spend 60 minutes brushing up on healthcare policy.

Trump 2016!

* The Ghostbusters New York identity is making a comeback. Out with the frustrated Tom Wolfe caricatures and in with the coarse, loud, populist trouble makers.

Recall that the Ghostbusters biggest human enemies were a shrill EPA pencil-pusher trying to shut them down for environmental violations (Ghostbusters I) and the mayor’s sneering assistant/consultant who has them committed to a psychiatric hospital (Ghostbusters II).

Like Trump they are obsessed with NY real estate. They also enjoy ruffling elitist feathers – destroying the posh “Sedgewick Hotel,” acting boorish in art museums, making a mockery of higher ed, filming embarrassingly lowbrow commercials, stealing Sigourney Weaver from her snooty cellist boyfriend, flinging mood slime around in fancy restaurants, etc. They practically fetishize the working classes, falling in love with an old firehouse and casting themselves as new age firemen and roleplaying as construction workers with undisguised gusto.

And that’s without going into the illegal immigrant angle of supernatural infestation.

* Who started the “pearl clutching” expression used to describe the establishment hyperventilating over something non-PC? Was it you, Steve? I see it at Breitbart, and wonder if it is another sign of your influence, or if you just popularized it.

Posted in America | Comments Off on ‘Super Trump: It’s Breakfast In America Again’

The ‘Stump for Trump’ Girls Just Said on CNN That Marco Rubio Had ‘A Gay Lifestyle’

REPORT:

Screen Shot 2016-02-26 at 11.21.26 AMYou know those “Stump for Trump Girls, Lynette “Diamond” Hardaway and Rochelle “Silk” Richardson? Well, in case you don’t follow them on Twitter and didn’t get the memo, they were on CNN this morning. As usual, the sisters caused quite a stir with the few minutes they were given.

They were invited on to talk about last night’s debate, which was a pretty explosive affair. While there, they told Carol Costello that they were fairly sure that Donald Trump‘s rival Marco Rubio was gay, at least in his past, if not now.

Diamond said, “When I look at Marco Rubio, Marco Rubio told us to Google Donald Trump, but I did one better: I Googled him and when I Googled him, you know, he owes America and the gay community an apology.”

“That’s right,” interjected Silk.

“It sounds like he may have had a gay lifestyle in his past!” she concluded.

“What?” shrieked Costello, clearly shocked. “No, Lynette… Lynette.”

The anchor, obviously not looking forward to hearing from the Rubio campaign later, swiftly moved to another topic.

They went on to talk about Trump’s habit of decrying immigrants for taking American jobs while giving jobs in his hotels to immigrants, which neither Diamond nor Silk took offense with.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The ‘Stump for Trump’ Girls Just Said on CNN That Marco Rubio Had ‘A Gay Lifestyle’

Did Rubio Have An Affair With A Lobbyist?

REPORT: Looks like Marco Rubio has some ‘splaining to do. More and more rumors are surfacing out of Florida that he had an ongoing affair with a DC lobbyist named Amber Stoner. This allegedly occurred while he wase serving as the Speaker of the Florida State House of Representatives. He used an American Express credit card from the Florida Republican Party to pay for AT LEAST 17 separate trips for the two of them. They seemed to end up in the very same place frequently. I’ve heard these rumors for some time now and usually where there is smoke, there is fire with this sort of thing. I’m surprised it didn’t come out before this though. Rubio seems to not only have questionable finances, but iffy morals as well.

From the Political Insider:

We know that Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) is part of the political “establishment”… but we didn’t know he took it this far!

As the Nevada GOP primary caucus is underway, reports of an extramarital affair Rubio had with a Washington, D.C. lobbyist have surfaced.

Per sources in Florida, Marco Rubio – while serving as the Speaker of the Florida State House of Representatives – used an American Express credit card from the Florida Republican Party to pay for AT LEAST 17 separate trips for Rubio and lobbyist Amber Stoner. Strangely, she would frequently end up in the same destinations, at the same time:

Marco-Rubio1

The records in question are publicly searchable on The Florida Times-Union website. People are asking why a lobbyist would be traveling using his credit card and why a number of those trips were to resort locations. Rubio is the anointed one of the establishment. They hope to eliminate Cruz and shove Rubio in at the last minute. No thanks, I’d rather have Trump. At least he will address the borders and immigration issues. Rubio is a liar and all for illegal immigration and Amnesty. This goes to character and shows how duplicitous Rubio is. He’s already shown that by how he has treated Ted Cruz. Dig a little more into his life and I’m betting it gets very dirty.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Did Rubio Have An Affair With A Lobbyist?

The Wall Street Journal’s War on Donald Trump

The National Interest: As Donald Trump continues his Shermanesque march through the Republican primaries, the Wall Street Journal continues to fire relentless volleys of cheap shots, pot shots, and the paper’s much hoped for gut shot. Just consider last week’s run-up to what would be Trump’s resounding South Carolina victory.

Just days prior to the vote, the editorial page demanded Trump release his tax returns to call into question the true wealth of the undisputed billionaire. In a front page lead story, reporters also featured a cooked up poll claiming to show Trump falling behind Ted Cruz in a national poll.

This poll result was laughable on its face considering Cruz’s weak South Carolina showing. Cruz lost every single county, including those neck deep in evangelicals.

More broadly, the Journal has waged a relentless war on Trump’s promise to crack down on China’s currency manipulation. It has falsely called into question Trump’s clear understanding of the Trans-Pacific Partnership—which the Journal supports and Trump accurately describes as a horrible deal for American workers and domestic manufacturers.

As reported in Breitbart, the Journal is also fond of using op-ed surrogates to nip at Trump’s heels. Examples include a “pseudo-economics hit piece by Mary O’Grady” on Trump’s anti-NAFTA position, a Karl Rove “take-out” piece declaring Trump as a debate loser and another Rove stiletto describing Trump as the Democrat’s “dream nominee” who would get “creamed” in the general election.

Just why is the world’s journalistic beacon of capitalism trying to assassinate the character and candidacy of one of the world’s leading beacons of capitalism in action? The answer may be found in two words: Rupert Murdoch.

In a modern day version of Moby-Dick, Murdoch has long sought to capture the “Red Whale” that is China—and Murdoch has done this with far more success than Ahab. As a result of his quest, Murdoch’s television channels broadcast more programming into China than any other foreign media group..

Nor is Murdoch’s success surprising given these New York Times salvos against the media mogul:

“Many big companies have sought to break into the Chinese market over the past two decades, but few of them have been as ardent and unrelenting as Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. Mr. Murdoch has flattered Communist Party leaders and done business with their children. His Fox News network helped China’s leading state broadcaster develop a news website. . . . Mr. Murdoch cooperates closely with China’s censors and state broadcasters. . . . He cultivates political ties that he hopes will insulate his business ventures from regulatory interference. . . . In speeches and interviews, Mr. Murdoch often supports the policies of Chinese leaders and attacks their critics. . . . His courtship has made him the Chinese leadership’s favorite foreign media baron.”

Given Murdoch’s deep China connections, it is hardly surprising that his media outlets around the globe regularly take a soft line on China—and a harder and harder line on Trump’s candidacy.

At the top of this designated hitter’s list is the Wall Street Journal. But what is also surprising is that the outspoken commentators at America’s Fox News also go along with Murdoch’s peculiar form of self-censorship.

Indeed, if there ever were a forum for right-wing commentators to jump hard on the myriad dimensions of an emerging China threat, it would be at “fair and balanced” Fox. Yet you rarely hear a peep on this issue from the mouths of Neil Cavuto, Sean Hannity, Charles Krauthammer, Bill O’Reilly or Trump’s designated hit woman at Fox—Megyn Kelly.

Instead, the task of exposing the complex dimensions of China’s military buildup—what should be quite literally “red meat” to America’s Right Wing—has fallen on the shoulders of conservative specialty outlets with far smaller audiences.

In the shorter run, the big political question is this: Will Trump continue to withstand the vitriolic attacks on his capitalist flanks from the likes of the Wall Street Journal and Fox? While it is axiomatic that you shouldn’t pick fights with folks that buy ink by the barrel—or regularly win the cable news ratings wars—Trump didn’t pick this fight. He just now finds himself in the WSJ/Fox crosshairs—with only a strong core of voters as his shield.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on The Wall Street Journal’s War on Donald Trump

Is Foam Party Rubio A Choke Artist?

Scott Adams blogs: Trump tested a new Linguistic Kill Shot for Rubio, calling him a “choke artist” for freezing up on stage at the last debate. As always, Trump’s engineered kill shots have the following qualities:

1. The insult is a type you haven’t heard before in politics. I call it a fresh field insult. That allows Trump to imbue it with his own meaning. The words “choke artist” do not remind you of anyone else in politics.

2. Adding “artist” to choke makes you think past the sale. The sale is whether Rubio is a choker. Your brain accepts that truth in order to process whether or not Rubio is an artist at choking or just a regular choker. (I’ll bet you missed that.)

3. It took about ten seconds for Twitter users to realize that “choke artist” reminded them of a sexual act that sometimes happens after the foam party at the gay nightclub. And let’s say the “artist” in this case is not the one standing upright.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Is Foam Party Rubio A Choke Artist?

The Power Of Pushing Economic Populism

A Jewish friend has been telling me for years that while race realism is not a realistic political platform, economic populism is a winner. Donald Trump has taken up its cause and he’s rocketed to the top.

My friend tells me today: Its pretty clear that race realism has such powerful enemies, that it only succeeds underground and at the fringes even though if you look at how people act rather than what they say or write, they do accept it.

But economic populism is a very powerful force. That is the reason that those who suffered as a result of deindustrialization, affirmative action in civil service jobs, illegal immigration suppressing wages and supplanting workers in lower skilled jobs, higher college costs, globalization and the financialization of the economy, have been suppressed for a long time. They have been made to think the problems they have have been their own fault, as if any assembly line worker, can just as easily with the correct training become a software engineer.

I was listening to Rush Limbaugh earlier this week and one of the points he made (and I am paraphrasing) was that we are told that we have to understand what drives the rage, anger and political agendas of out groups. This includes understanding the reasons we were attacked on 9-11, understanding that we are at fault for being Islamaphobic, that we have to understand the roots of the Black Lives Matter Movement and Occupy Movements, feminism and gay and transsexual rights. But there is no corresponding, on the part of the MSM, desire to look at the roots of the tea party movement, or the Trump supporters, instead they are labeled racists or authoritarians.

Ann Althouse also had an interesting observation when after the Nevada caucus results Trump said, We love the low education voters. Althouse said that the persons Trump was referring to do not get any respect or attention from what is conventionally called “the elites” and what Peggy Noonan would refer to as the “protected class.” Since Trump is giving them respect and “love” that is recognizing them, validating their experience on a level that no other candidate has done.

Everyone wants to see how the attacks on Trump at last nights debate play in the Super Tuesday voting. The Conservative Treehouse points out that the number of voters so far in the two caucuses and two primaries, if you take away the Trump votes are similar to 2012 and 2008. What Trump has done, is not cut into the traditional Republican base of evangelicals, social conservatives, neoconservatives and fiscal conservatives, but has brought in new voters who are more economic nationalists and populists, who outnumber the old line Republican voters. If this is true, then his debate performance probably won’t hurt him much in the upcoming primaries. If he is drawing from the traditional Republicans then the attacks may have some impact but probably won’t turn any of his new voters to vote for either Cruz or Rubio.

By the way Chris Christie endorsed Trump which probably doesn’t mean anything in the way people vote, and of course Christie never gained traction because of his embrace of Obama for assistance given by the Federal government in connection with superstorm Sandy, but I would say that it means that Christie is actively campaigning to be Trump’s hatchet man which is the traditional role of the vice presidential pick.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Power Of Pushing Economic Populism

NYT: To Fight Critics, Donald Trump Aims to Instill Fear in 140-Character Doses

The MSM is mad it no longer has a monopoly on publicly shaming people.

New York Times:

Corey Lewandowski, the Trump campaign manager, said his candidate’s practice of battering opponents on social media showed that Mr. Trump was “the ultimate counterpuncher,” a tough candidate unwilling to take even the slightest criticism lightly.

“When someone attacks him, should he just not respond?” Mr. Lewandowski said. “That’s not fair.”

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on NYT: To Fight Critics, Donald Trump Aims to Instill Fear in 140-Character Doses