TOP PSYCHOLOGIST: GOOGLE’S ALGORITHM WILL RIG THE ELECTION FOR HILLARY

Posted on November 4, 2016 by Luke Ford

Google had blackballed this website from its search results since August 17 (the original reason on that date was that there was malicious code in comments posted on the site even though that WordPress comments section has always been closed on this site) even though its own webmaster tools reveal there is no malicious code and no other such problems with the site.

Paul Joseph Watson writes:

According to top psychologist Robert Epstein, the power of Google’s algorithm to manipulate public opinion is so strong that it can influence up to 10 million undecided voters, ensuring a victory for Hillary Clinton.
After several years of research involving more than 10,000 people in 39 countries, Epstein concluded that Google has “the power to control elections” and that by favoring one candidate over another in some demographics up to 80 percent of undecided voters can be easily manipulated.
Google’s long standing support for Hillary Clinton runs so deep, that Google parent company Alphabet’s Executive Chairman, Eric Schmidt, met with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and asked if he could be Hillary’s “head outside advisor.”
“Many people have established that Google has a very close relationship with Hillary Clinton,” Epstein told RT, adding that, “Google seems to be favoring Hillary Clinton in its search suggestions, the suggestions it gives you when you first start to type an item.”
Back in August, we proved how Google had altered its search algorithm to prevent searches for “Clinton body count” from auto-completing, despite the term auto-completing when typed in on virtually any other search engine.
Back in June it was revealed by SourceFed that Google was indeed manipulating its search results to bury unflattering stories about Hillary.
“For example, when typing “Hillary Clinton cri,” Google’s auto-complete function brings up as its top choice “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” even though competing search engines Bing and Yahoo show the most popular search topics are “Hillary Clinton criminal charges” and “Hillary Clinton crime,” reported the Washington Times.
In August last year, Politico reported on how “Google could rig the 2016 election” by altering its search algorithms.
Epstein also noted that Facebook has the power to shift up to 600,000 voters on election day by simply sending out targeted reminders to Hillary Clinton supporters telling them to vote, while not sending out the same reminder to Trump supporters.
According to Epstein, who is a Clinton supporter himself, “Hillary Clinton is guaranteed to win this election” by approximately 6.5 million votes because polls don’t take into account Google’s algorithm to control the behavior of up to 10 million voters.
“Google’s algorithm has probably been determining the outcomes of close elections around the world for many years, probably actually controlling the winner in as many as 25 percent of the national elections of the world,” warns Epstein, adding that Google’s power was “unprecedented in human history” and constitutes a dangerous “threat to democracy” because it has no competitor and is automatically trusted more than any newspaper, magazine or television station.

Posted in Google | Comments Off on TOP PSYCHOLOGIST: GOOGLE’S ALGORITHM WILL RIG THE ELECTION FOR HILLARY

Hillary’s emails matter: A retired CIA officer explains why

Posted on October 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

TheHill:

I have worked in national security my entire life. Most of that has been in the intelligence community surrounded by classified information. For twenty years, I worked undercover in the Central Intelligence Agency, recruiting sources, producing intelligence and running operations. I have a pretty concrete understanding of how classified information is handled and how government communications systems work.

Nobody uses a private email server for official business. Period. Full stop.

The entire notion is, to borrow a phrase from a Clinton campaign official, “insane.” That anyone would presume to be allowed to do so is mind-boggling. That government officials allowed Hillary Clinton to do so is nauseating.

Classified and unclassified information do not mix. They don’t travel in the same streams through the same pipes. They move in clearly well defined channels so that never the twain shall meet. Mixing them together is unheard of and a major criminal offense.

If you end up with classified information in an unclassified channel, you have done something very wrong and very serious.

Accidentally removing a single classified message from controlled spaces, without any evidence of intent or exposure to hostile forces, can get you fired and cost you your clearance. Repeated instances will land you in prison.

Every hostile intelligence agency on the planet targets senior American officials for collection. The Secretary of State tops the list. Almost anything the Secretary of State had to say about her official duties, her schedule, her mood, her plans for the weekend, would be prized information to adversaries.

It is very difficult, in fact, to think of much of anything that the Secretary of State could be saying in email that we would want hostile forces to know.

As we wait for more information on the latest revelations, let’s quickly note what we already know Hillary Clinton did.

While Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton exclusively used a private email address for official business. Instead of using a State Department account, she used a personal email account, housed on a private server located in her home in Chappaqua, New York. The Department of State exercised zero control or oversight in this process. No government security personnel were involved in protecting them.

When the House Select Committee on Benghazi asked to see these emails, the Department of State said they did not have them. Clinton’s lawyers then went through all the emails on her server. They turned over 30,000 emails they decided were work related and deleted all of the rest.

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on Hillary’s emails matter: A retired CIA officer explains why

Sicario (2015)

Posted on October 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comment: I finally watched Sicario and one of the great aspects out of many excellent aspects in an overall great movie (80% of NCFOM wth Steve?) was the fact that Blunt was realistically a liability in hand to hand combat. Loved that her training in that area kind of worked but didn’t… like real life. Even if she had to kick open a locked door in the first action scene I get the feeling the director would have required a man to do it. I am willing to overlook the less than realistic bodies in internal wall cavities for the extra non-PC realism.

She’s also a whiny schoolmarm. So it’s not just the physical side it was the mental inflexibility and wrongheadedness in what was basically a war setting that was on the money with the story and direction. I watched it twice with the view to seeing if the black partner was likely corrupt, and yes, I agree with whoever it was on here who suggested that he was. Everything he did pointed to it. I thought it was classic that the director made the AA hire black guy subtly just happen to be as corrupt as Obama, Donna Brazile, Cheryl Mills and Loretta Lynch, while feigning concern… something of an Easter Egg.

While on the subject, the epic score made the movie. Usually overlooked, this was yet another case where the score was more than icing on the cake, it was an intrinsic part of the cake itself. (Like most cakes that are designed for icing, icing is not an optional component). The score provided the constant feeling of foreboding, of dread, and of descent into hell that was so well married to the scene where the US forces literally sunk into the darkness in the final mission.

* I got the impression that Blunt was an incompetent leader who had been AA’d to her position. Note that she was not really taking proper charge of the opening raid, and let a couple of careless cops get themselves blown up by an obvious potential booby trap. She was specifically brought into the CIA/DEA extradition operation because she would provide the legal cover, while being too weak and incompetent to screw it up.
As to her partner, he was kept out because the operators didn’t need a second affirmative action agent in the team for their purposes. I agree it was suspicious that after he was locked out he kept trying to find what they were up to and that maybe it was more than just trying to make sure she didn’t get hurt. The meeting in the bar with his old buddy also looked suspiciously like a setup to get information out of her.
Good movie but the best part of it, which was the tense extradition sequence, was unrealistic. Knowing Mexican attitudes towards the US, it is no more plausible that the government would let a bunch of heavily armed gringo commandos go convoying through their city and shooting it up, than that the US authorities would permit the mirror operation.

RE: Women in heels:

* They’re trying to attract the attention of certain men, but attract the attention of nearly all men. It truly seems to confound them that they’re noticed by not only the men they would like, but by the rest of them as well which disgusts them. I don’t think they fully appreciate how ridiculous it is to base a legal framework around this – when, for example, the woman dresses provocatively in the workplace to attract the attention of the high status male(s) but wants the government to punish everyone if the cubicle dork approaches her awkwardly.

Posted in Hollywood | Comments Off on Sicario (2015)

2nd Jewish-American journalist speaks of sexual misconduct by Israeli media personality

Posted on October 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

(JTA) — Amid allegations from a Los Angeles reporter of sexual assault by an eminent Israeli journalist, a Jewish journalist from New York said she also was abused by another Israeli journalist.

Avital Chizhik, a contributor to Haaretz, The New York Times and Tablet magazine, revealed on Twitter that she had an almost identical experience to the one described by Danielle Berrin of the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles, who last week accused Haaretz columnist Ari Shavit of sexually assaulting her two years ago in California.

“This almost-exact story happened to me years ago with another Israeli media personality,” Chizhik, the daughter-in-law of Moscow Chief Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt, wrote on Twitter on Wednesday, without naming the person in question. She added: “Not okay.”

Posted in Abuse, Israel | Comments Off on 2nd Jewish-American journalist speaks of sexual misconduct by Israeli media personality

Study Finds Racial Discrimination by Uber and Lyft Drivers

Posted on October 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

The sharing economy only works in an atmosphere of high social trust. In other words, it only works with people who are honest, law-abiding, and responsible, which large parts of America are not.

As long as you have racially distinct communities with high crime rates, it makes sense to avoid people in those communities.

Comments:

* Good for Uber! Regular cab companies can’t discriminate when a couple of cute little black women hail them and give an address at the worst project in town where their men will rob and beat the driver.

* It still amazes me that it apparently never occurred to anybody on the Left that their project to mass-shame white people might completely backfire.

Even if you take the Leftist narrative at face value, it ought to be obvious how stupid their plan was. If shaming and demoralizing American blacks just made the black community angrier, more insular, and more vulnerable to wacky conspiracy theories, why wouldn’t you expect whites to have the exact same reaction? If Jim Crow gave us the Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam, why wouldn’t you expect Jim Snow to give us Pepe the Frog and the Alt-Right?

Bloomberg: Drivers for Uber Technologies Inc. in Boston canceled rides for men with black-sounding names more than twice as often as for other men. Black people in Seattle using Uber and Lyft Inc. faced notably longer wait times to get paired with drivers than white customers. The findings come from a study published on Monday by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University and the University of Washington.
“In many ways, the sharing economy is making it up as they go along,” said Christopher Knittel, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management and an author of the study. “A lot of this is a learning process, and you can’t expect these companies to have everything perfect right out of the gate.”

Posted in America, Blacks | Comments Off on Study Finds Racial Discrimination by Uber and Lyft Drivers