Living With Diversity

Bloomberg:

“Millennials don’t like to get naked—if you go to the gym now, everyone under 30 will put their underwear on under the towel, which is a massive cultural shift,” he continues.

Comments:

* Because getting naked only works in very specific and rare situations. Ie a safe and homogeneous society with people whose behavior you can predict, like Germany and Scandinavia in the 20th century.

When people around you become too different, you’re forced to play it safe wherever you go, and you don’t just switch off that mindset at home.

This is why the prediction that white people’s clothes are going to get less and less sexual is a very safe bet. 20th century style safety was a historical anomaly, sadly. It didn’t have to be, but that’s what we wanted.

* I think all these causes folks have noted are part of it:
– diversity and end of the mass, one-nation, all on the same team culture
– end common\expected military service
– individualism
– the issue of homosexual child predators being “out there”
– homosexuality normalized
– smaller families, larger houses, more privacy growing up
– prosperity, more individual amenities (inc. my own shower)
– cell phone cameras

This has been a long time developing. My freshman dorm built in ’69 or ’70 had individual shower stalls. The dorm i was in my middle and senior years built in the 40s (and all the others of that vintage) had gang showers. The local community pool from 60s\70s vintage has gang showers. My old health club–80s\90s vintage–individual shower stalls, some with curtains–which some of the non-white foreigners seem to prefer. (I’ve never been in my kids HS locker rooms, it’s hard to imagine they build enough individual shower stalls to accomodate an entire gym class showering and changing … don’t know what they do.)

But it’s quite noteable in millenials. My son though much more fit than me–quite reasonably being 36 years my junior–looking like Micheangelo’s David, is nonetheless much more modest about being seen naked. That seemed to be generally true of his buddies in scouts as well.

And yet:
– the binikis are even smaller. There’s all this personal modest amongst basically friends\classmates, but then there is very little covering up on the public beaches, little “left to the imagination”. Even urban workout attire is skimpy and gives you pretty much the full picture of how everything is situated.
– the millenials hug everybody. I first had this rubbed in my face, when i saw my adolescent daughter giving a hug to some guy who was really just an acquaintance. (Didn’t like that. I hugged one girl in HS–the girl i was dating. You didn’t hug the world.) One of my older daughter’s friends, whom i’d never met before, came with her for thanksgiving dinner. At the end of the evening, she initiates a full on solid pretty intimate hug. (I don’t mind being hugged by young women, but it’s sure different than a generation back.) It’s definitely a thing … hugs, hugs, hugs

* From junior high school in the 60′s through grad school in the early 80′s I showered naked in shower rooms without stalls. It never really crossed my mind that this was unusual in any way, and I remember how totally astonished I was in 1996 when I read that Times article about the new prudery.

I belong to two health clubs: the one near my home has a working class clientele; while the one near work is quite upscale. Nobody ever gets naked in the former, and the showers are almost unused. People do shower in the latter (they have to go back to the office!), and there is a certain amount of nudity, mostly among older men. But even there, I notice much more modesty than I did 20 years ago.

I’m convinced the fundamental reason for the new prudery is the sexualization of everything — in particular the normalization of homosexuality, and the moral panic over pedophilia. The whole thing strikes me as quite sad, but I don’t see us going back any time soon. Now that everybody is a potential sex object for everybody else, the only way people could become comfortable with nudity again would be by jumping all the way to full blown nudism, which always involved potential sex partners traipsing around naked in each others company, and which was always seen as kind of weird. Given the outfits you see on the beach these days you might think we were almost there already, and yet somehow those tiny strips of fabric carry huge symbolic significance. Geez, people are so strange…

* One big driver of modern modesty in America is the promotion of aggressive homosexuality (and latterly trans-wackiness) by the powers that be. All young people are afraid to forfend or resist sexual assault by demanding enforcement of locker-room decorum lest they be denounced as “queer bashers” or “haters” (with “racist” thrown in for lagniappe), so they just try to avoid exposing themselves to leering, groping, and potentially rape by adminstratively-licensed assailants. Teachers are correspondingly afraid to keep order in locker rooms because offenders can invert any discplinary measures by false accusations of LGTBQ-insensitivity.

* Some nudist colonies are actually child porn rings. When I first became involved in the hospitality industry, we received a mailer from a Florida nudist colony which sold videotaped children’s beauty pageants for over a hundred bucks a tape, it should go without saying that the kids were in the buff. The owners who received the mailer laughed it off like, “Can you believe those wacky hippies?” Until I explained what it was and told them to take it to the local p.d. to ask it be forwarded to the FBI.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on Living With Diversity

A Requiem for Friendship Why Boys Will Not Be Boys & Other Consequences of the Sexual Revolution

Anthony Esolen writes:

The pansexualists—they who believe in the libertarian dogma that what two consenting adults do with their privates in private is nobody’s business—understand that the language had to be changed to assist the realization of their dream, and also that the realization of their dream would change the world, because it would change the language for everyone else.

Language is not language if it is not communal; it is a neat trick of political abracadabra to argue for an individual’s right to change the very medium of our thought and our social intercourse. If clothing is optional on a beach, then that is a nude beach. It cannot be a nude beach for some and an ordinary beach for others; to wear clothes at that beach at the very least means something that it had not meant before. If you may paint your house phosphorescent orange and violet, and you persuade a couple of your neighbors to do likewise, you no longer have what anybody would call a historic neighborhood.

If all of Kate’s friends leap into bed with whatever male gives them a hearty dinner at Burger King and a round of miniature golf, and Kate chooses instead to kiss her date once on the cheek and leave him on the porch, she will suggest to everybody that she is a prude. She may be, or may not be; she may be more firmly in the grip of lust than they are, for all we know, and may just detest the boy. But her actions have connotations they did not use to have.

Imagine a world wherein the taboo has been broken and incest is loudly and defiantly celebrated. Your wife’s unmarried brother puts his hand on your daughter’s shoulder. That gesture, once innocent, must now mean something, or at least suggest something. If the uncle were wise and considerate, he would not make it in the first place. You see a father hugging his teenage daughter as she leaves the car to go to school. The possibility flits before your mind. The language has changed, and the individual can do nothing about it.

By now the reader must see the point. I might say that of all human actions there is nothing more powerfully public than what two consenting adults do with their bodies behind (we hope) closed doors. Open homosexuality, loudly and defiantly celebrated, changes the language for everyone. If a man throws his arm around another man’s waist, it is now a sign—whether he is on the political right or the left, whether he believes in biblical proscriptions of homosexuality or not.

If a man cradles the head of his weeping friend, the shadow of suspicion must cross your mind. If a teenage boy is found skinny-dipping with another boy—not five of them, but two—it is the first thing you will think, and you will think it despite the obvious fact that until swim trunks were invented this was exactly how two men or boys would go for a swim.

Because language is communal, the individual can choose to make a sign or not. He cannot determine what the sign is to mean, not to others, not to the one he signals, and not even to himself.

Posted in Homosexuality | Comments Off on A Requiem for Friendship Why Boys Will Not Be Boys & Other Consequences of the Sexual Revolution

Build The Wall!

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* I worked for an industrial manufacturing company where the labor on the factory floor was 99% Mexican except for the manufacturing and test engineers who were 95% South Asian or Arab. The Mexicans were long term US residents, who had been working a long time, and you would have thought had been amnestied by Reagan.
The company was bought out by a large corporation and in the routine process of transferring the payroll system, more than a third of the factory workers’ Social Security numbers popped up as duplicates or fakes. The new company had to fire them and do a mad scramble to find new qualified hires who could pass e-verify. Of course all the new hires were still Mexicans, they just had legal status. The surviving workers would put out the word on the openings to fellow Mexicans and the supervisors hired accordingly.
By the way, these were all specifically Mexicans, not Central Americans. A Guatemalan or Honduran had no more chance of getting in than a German or Nigerian. These folks had no interest in working next to anyone who rooted for the wrong national soccer team. At the last World Cup they all thought the referees cheated Mexico out of a win, and they were pretty glum about the White Germans shellacking the Brown Brazilians. Concentric loyalties.

* It’s untenable to predict that “most” Latino illegal aliens will end up apprehended by police for drunken or drugged driving, or for any other offense for that matter. Most of those committing such offenses will simply get away with it, and will not be “found out” and deported on this basis.

Without concerted enforcement action in workplaces (including day labor centers and farms) and neighborhoods, many millions of illegal aliens will stay here, largely under the radar, while their wives or girlfriends and children bilk taxpayers for medical care (much of it at emergency rooms where they legally cannot be turned away). food stamps, and public education costing $12,000 to $15.000 per year for every child (more if they require special education or remedial classes, as is disproportionately the case).

Trump needs to repeal obama’s executive orders immediately, most of all any amnesty or immigration non-enforcement orders.

Then e-verify, again relentlessly enforced to find and punish both illegal alien employees and especially those who hire them instead of hiring Americans.

We also need to require foreigners (and this would include my own dear wife) to wait say more than five years as legal permanent residents before becoming eligible for citizenship. Try twenty years, at least, if we are truly careful about expecting full assimilation to our language, culture, and mores before citizenship.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Build The Wall!

How To Destroy American Democracy

Posted in America | Comments Off on How To Destroy American Democracy

Rabbi Joshua Hammerman: ‘What’s Jewish about Political Correctness?’

Rabbi Hammerman writes: “That’s also why it is Jewishly correct to be politically correct. Not only that, but political correctness has turned out to be really good business. Even as the White House is now inhabited by the most unabashedly politically incorrect president in history, a P.C. landslide is sweeping the country.”

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Rabbi Joshua Hammerman: ‘What’s Jewish about Political Correctness?’

The Most Expensive Real Estate In The World

What do these places have in common?

1. Hong Kong, China
2. Sydney, NSW, Australia
2. Vancouver, BC, Canada
4. Auckland, New Zealand
5. San Jose, CA, US
6. Melbourne, VIC, Australia
7. Honolulu, HI, US
8. Los Angeles, CA, US
9. San Francisco, CA, US
10. Bournemouth & Dorset, UK

Posted in Real Estate | Comments Off on The Most Expensive Real Estate In The World

Trump’s Ability To Fight

Comment: Few things about Trump seem more remarkable to me than that he was perfectly able to sustain the most vile accusations and vitriol, at an intensity and pervasiveness without any precedent in modern times, and with virtually no support from any quarter of our culture with a voice, and come out fighting — and winning.

In some ways, it’s hard to reconcile Trump’s seeming hyper-reactivity to criticism with his ultimate ability to shrug it off and push on — but there it is.

Trump really is a remarkable man and an outsize personality. I can’t think of another individual who even remotely approaches him in these ways.

It’s worthwhile to contrast him with other billionaires, who seem to be eager above all to be approved as good, virtuous citizens by the cultural powers that be. One might think that, having earned more than enough “f**k you money” for a thousand lifetimes, they would be happy to speak their mind and not care about the consequences. But that seems to be no more true of them than it is of academics who have achieved tenure.

The general abjectness of today’s billionaire class — and Bill Gates is a splendid example — is a deeply discouraging sight. Bill Gates, who once upon a time, was notorious for deriding certain of his workers for lacking sufficient IQ, now affects to the world that everybody is the same. What a pathetic figure he has become.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump’s Ability To Fight

Why Do Blacks Vote Democrat?

Comment: You need to view them as a domestic Nation within a Nation – a tribe if you will – with its own mythos akin to the trail of tears in the Great Migration. Blacks see black-0n-black violence as an intrafamilial matter that’s none of your business. The more you point to blacks killing blacks for accidentally stepping on one’s new white sneakers as the real problem (statistically and proportionately it is), the more obstinate they’ll get and the more they’ll reject reality in favor of narratives of racial conflict with the dominant population. As with families they can beat one another up night and day but they’ll all lose it if someone outside of the family engages in a justified dispute with one of its members.

The BLM narrative is in many ways a sublimation of the anxieties and tragedy of the real problem to express it in a way that is not disloyal to the tribe. This is a psychological and emotionally-based response, not one founded in reason and as a result no amount of reasoning and argument and cold facts will change it (of course, since the BLM narrative is politically useful to the Left and a true look at black violence is not, the media feeds the former while eliding the contrary facts).

This WaPo piece from September is actually pretty good at getting to the heart of the matter of black political involvement – blacks vote Democrat out of a sense of tribal solidarity even when they have significant disagreements with the positions and platforms of the Democratic party and the individual candidates on offer.

This is why Republicans pranging on about gay marriage, the Left’s hostility to Christianity and family, school choice, pointing to poorly-run urban governments, outright corruption, etc. and even fielding black GOP candidates doesn’t move the needle of black voting at all. The best that Republicans can do is to hope that blacks are less than enthusiastic in any cycle and just don’t bother to vote.

* As Lee Kuan Yew noticed, “In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.”

* I think it’s people with the liberal view of race who get themselves into situations like this. As a race realist, I would never confront a group of NAMs over smoking in a no-smoking area, or littering, or using bad language. I know how volatile and indifferent to the consequences of employing violence they are. A lot of white liberals actually believe that NAMs are not that different from themselves. They think they’re capable of calmly accepting criticism from a white person.

I’ve read numerous stories about whites being killed after remonstrating with NAMs about their bad behavior and assume these people had liberal views about race. You have to be realistic. I have my CCW permit, but would never want to have to employ deadly force in any situation I could have ignored or walked away from. Not in today’s America.

* The dudes I train with call it, ‘don’t go to Walmart at 3 a.m. to get milk’.

AKA situational awareness.

AKA the best way to not lose a gunfight is not to get into a gunfight.

AKA mind your own damn bizness when it comes to NAMs.

AKA why you can’t have nice things (hat tip Derb).

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Why Do Blacks Vote Democrat?

Ari Paul: ‘Do Punch Nazis: Richard Spencer Attack Was Self-Defense’

Ari writes for Observer.com:

A viral video of a masked protester socking white supremacist and anti-Semite Richard Spencer in the jaw as he was being interviewed about protests at the presidential inauguration prompted an increasingly common question: when it is acceptable to use non-lethal violence against those who advocate ethnic cleansing?

It’s difficult for many to say out loud, but the violent attack against Spencer does not deserve condemnation.

Those who don’t underestimate the violent nature of white supremacy see these acts of intimidation—including the attack on Spencer—as self-defense.
Spencer advocates a white nationalism masquerading as nonviolent, despite his followers’ clearly apocalyptic fantasy language. His movement spurred an on-again-off-again-maybe-on-again armed march by Neo-Nazis against Jews in his hometown of Whitefish, Montana. The Southern Poverty Law Center reports a spike in racist incidents following Donald Trump’s election, including several dozen bomb threats against Jewish community centers. Even if Spencer maintains he wants a nonviolent sorting of the races, many of his rabid followers are having none of it, and he’s canny enough to know it. Up until months ago, it seemed that the alt-right might be extreme and reprehensible, but still operating under free speech. But when a movement becomes so inherently racist and violent, we must judge the attack on Spencer in the right context.

So if people take offense at Ari’s views justifying the violence against Spencer, I am sure he’ll be fine if they beat him up.

Posted in Richard Spencer | Comments Off on Ari Paul: ‘Do Punch Nazis: Richard Spencer Attack Was Self-Defense’

Crisis Averted: Obama Finally de-blackballed by Jewish Country Club

Steve Sailer writes:

That’s why Jewish country clubs were famous for immediately letting in lots of Italians, Poles, French Canadians, blacks, Japanese, Mexicans, American Indians and all the other people discriminated against by WASP country clubs. For example … well … hmhhhmmhmm … actually I can’t think of any examples.

Oh, wait: here’s an example: Hillcrest, the Hollywood moguls’ country club, let in Danny Thomas, when he was one of the top television stars and most admired philanthropists in the country, after only about 30 or 35 years of being 100% Jewish.

Or here’s another example of the open-armed love of diversity for which Jewish country clubs were so famous: After WWII, the German Jewish Century Club in Westchester County started letting in Russian Jews after merely a couple of generations of blackballing every single one of them who tried to sneak in.

You almost might think from the historical record that Jews kind of liked having their own country clubs, just like the WASPs liked having their own.

But, of course, no, it couldn’t possibly be true that Jews tend to be kind of like everybody else when it comes to being somewhat ethnocentric. It’s unthinkable that rich golfing Jews ever had any agency.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* One need not have seen this article to know how it was going to turn out. The mere fact, that there was some public noise about the situation meant that these guys were going to get some serious, mounting pressure from other Jews to admit Obama. Failure to admit Obama would draw some *very* unwanted attention to the membership policies of Jewish clubs, which further rubs right up against the issue of Jewish behavior, ethnocentrism and the very nature of Judaism.

Maintaining fictions–gentiles discriminate, we Jews welcome integration; Jews are progressive, open, non-discriminatory–and keeping gentiles from thinking very hard about Jewish behavior–hey, now how come Jews get to discriminate? how come Jews get to be tribal and ethnocentric? but all that is racist for white Christians?–is way more important than settling some petty meaningless score over UN votes on Israel.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Crisis Averted: Obama Finally de-blackballed by Jewish Country Club