Election Commentary

A friend says: The Democrats took several traditionally Republican seats in California which pushed their gains to plus 36 instead of the plus 26 last night. That’s a lot bigger than I anticipated although I don’t know if substantively it will do anything. Assuming Trump runs in 2020 and is reasonably popular many of those seats will revert to Republicans unless those elected to those seats significantly moderate their positions. It looks like both Dana Rohrbacher and Steve Knight lost in close elections, but Bloomberg came in and donated a huge amount of money for targeted (and non targeted) ad buys. I think this also made the difference. If the numbers reported by Robert Stacy McCain after speaking with a Republican campaign operative are true that the Democrats outraised and outspent the Republicans by a 3 to 1 margin, then the Republicans should be happier than they are. They need to ramp up a Congressional campaign fund, find good candidates and they will be in good shape in 2020.

The election should give both Democrats and Republicans something to worry about. The Democrats out raised, outspent, had the media on their side, had the “resistance” on their side, had polls showing 55% of the country believing that the United States was going in the wrong direction, and this was the best they could do. Winning back some House seats. Losing Senate Seats.

The Republicans should be concerned because long term demographic trends are against them. And I don’t mean the big influx of Latino voters, but the overwhelming preponderance of young voters who supported the Democrats. The Republican Party had better start appealing to enough of them to offset the die off among the Republican supporters. It also looks like the ability of at least some of the Republican Candidates ( Scott and DeSantis in Florida) owe their election to Trump’s rallies and campaigning for them in Florida. This is all well and good, but the party needs to go beyond the personal appeal of Trump if it wants to maintain power.

Both sides also should take a look at the closeness of the vote in races such as the McSally Sinema race in Arizona, the Florida contests, Scott Walker in Wisconsin and Tester in Montana. Any of these elections could have easily gone the other way and the same is true for many of the house races. The question is turnout of the base. The problem is that the more polarized the country becomes and the more the other side is viewed not as the loyal opposition but the enemy the greater the turnout of the base. Thus there is no incentive to be conciliatory, but there is a premium on being confrontational.

It is my hope that Trump will work with the Democrats in the House to craft legislation, such as on infrastructure. I don’t know whether the Democratic base will allow that.

I think that if things cool down, which they might now that the Democrats have some power, then we could actually have a productive and internally peaceful next two years. If they don’t cool down, this could be the precursor to a societal breakdown.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Election Commentary

Election Open Thread

From Steve Sailer:

* Rush was right that the GOP was gaslit by the Russian-collusion hoax coming out of the gate. Recall after winning in Nov. 2016, Trump was almost immediately attacked with the Russia collusion crap. And there were all the leaks and guys like Flynn were getting caught up in the trap.

The GOP really thought Trump was not going to last. They probably thought that Russian crap was real and he’d be impeached or forced to resign. And they proceeded to waste away much of the first year thinking that they were working with a lame duck.

So in the end the Russian-collusion crap probably paid dividends for the democrats by totally sidetracking the new administration and keeping what should have been a friendly congress at arms length while they waited to see when it was safe to come out and work with Trump.

* And doesn’t Sessions bear a large measure of responsibility for the success of this Democrat scheme? He may be great on immigration, but he really dropped the ball on this one. Also, he seems to be more interested in covering up rather than exposing the corruption of the FBI.

* “In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.” – Lee Kuan Yew. This may turn out to be one of the most valid political observations of the century.

* Republican senate candidates are just barely eaking out victories in Florida, Arizona, and Texas – states they generally had few problems in 20 years ago. They’ll probably lose in Nevada, and they never stood a chance in California. Not sure what all these states have in common, but it’s right on the tip of my tongue.

In the postmortem Billy Kristol and his fellow clowns will be telling us we really need to embrace open borders if we want to keep winning.

* While Kemp will probably win Georgia and Cruz held on in Texas, the barbarians are at the gate. Radical leftists almost won these races in the South, and they did well enough to bring Democrats into the House from those states.

A lesbian won a House seat in Kansas and even Steve King had to sweat in Iowa. So the Senate went well tonight, but these suburban losses, from Richmond to Atlanta to Dallas, are a bad omen. Looks like a combo of “diversity” and pampered, status whoring suburban women.

* The good news from this election is that in spite of all the huffing and puffing, in spite of the mid-terms generally favoring the party that doesn’t control the White House, the GOP managed to (again) exceed expectations. They may very well end up netting 4-5 seats in the Senate. They will probably lose the House, but not nearly as badly as some feared. From my local perspective, Mia Effing Love (R-Haiti) appears to be on her way out. I once called her office and threatened to vote against her even though I don’t live in her district (LOL).

Hopefully Republicans will take away the right lessons from this election. Ever so slowly they seem to be coming around to the realization that taking a stand in the culture wars doesn’t hurt, and that defending the right to control our borders is actually a big plus.

* I would really love to talk to one of the many voters in Florida who voted Republican while at the same time voting for millions of felons to get their voting rights restored.

How freaking stupid are you? Thanks for both keeping Florida red and ensuring it will probably never go red again.

* I am really angry at Trump not curing everyone’s opioid addictions!

In many ways of course he could do better, but with a hostile House and friendly Supreme Court, and increasingly friendly Courts of Appeal, time for some executive action.

In addition to Amnesty Yoder going down, here’s more good news:
—-
“Tuesday was a rough night for authors of the GOP tax law,” the Wall Street Journal reports.

“Four Republican members of the Ways and Means Committee who all touted the law on the campaign trail lost their seats. Mike Bishop of Michigan, Carlos Curbelo of Florida, Erik Paulsen of Minnesota and Peter Roskam of Illinois won’t return to Congress next year.”
Kobach got screwed by most of the GOP. I see TV ads all the time from famous Kansas republicans who are opposing

* The repubs expanded their majority in the senate, in part (or maybe mostly) because of the Kavanaugh debacle. Of course, the media can’t talk about that. The dems taking the house has to be the big news. In one way, it obviously is, because it changes the direction of the house, but the narrative that the media wants is, “a repudiation of Trump.” They don’t want “a repudiation of ‘I am Spartacus!’ ”

Nowadays, whenever the dems win, the media cries, “The people have spoken!” When the republicans win, the media cries, “The people have succumbed to the puppet masters of hate!” The governor races of Kansas, Georgia and Florida point this out. In Kansas, the people have spoken. In Florida and Georgia, fear mongering white supremacists were elected. Also, a black lesbian on the Yahoo election broadcast said that Rep. Steve King of Iowa “went to Europe to meet with neo-nazis.” (King won, thankfully. What a brilliant puppet master he is.)

In the long term, last night’s election results most likely benefit Trump. A flamboyantly leftist and extremist house is exactly what’s needed over the next two years to get Trump reelected in 2020…just like an an extreme leftist judiciary committee helped the Senate become more Republican. The House will now spend most of it’s time trying to undermine the democratic process by nullifying the election of 2016, and will get little else done besides that. A lot of Americans aren’t going to like that.

* Trump has outperformed expectations, and now has control of the Republican Party. Instead of being an albatross around the neck of Republicans that supported him,

Trump will continue to appoint judges and justices, which will be confirmed by the Senate. Trump will set administrative policy and drive the national conversation.

Trump has shown himself to be a winner – again.

MORE COMMENTS:

* Kobach got screwed by most of the GOP. I see TV ads all the time from famous Kansas republicans who are opposing Kobach. The list is too long to count. Though I live in MO, I am close enough to KS where their ads are seen on my local TV.

What ticks me off is that for years we have been told by the GOP to support whatever candidate they put up in November, e.g. Bob Dole and John McCain. Then when one of ours finally gets to the final stage, not only do they not return the favor, but they actively campaign against him.

My gut reaction of course would be to abandon the GOP. But that would be suicidal since there is no other alternative. So we must soldier on and hopefully transform the party into what we need.

* No doubt about it – Trump salvaged this election for Republicans even if the Dems win the House. The Dems should have easily taken the Senate and House.

All the blame is on Ryan and his failure to campaign for House Republicans. The two Florida Republicans in Congress who lost were running away from President Trump. Carbello was running as a RINO and lost in a close election.

The flood of Puerto Ricans from Hurricane Irma last year did not help Republicans in Florida this year.

* Social media. There may be a movement to further regulate it in response. They’ll claim that it promoted racism or violence or something – maybe fake news. The WSJ has been waging war on YouTube for years, getting various red pilled channels banned for “hate speech” and leading advertiser boycotts. I think it is also possible they aggressively go after Pay Pal and other online financiers of dissidents, hoping to cut off their access to the masses.

* Beto did the GOP a solid by sucking in a zillion dollars of donations that could have gone to a winable race.

* I was watching Bannon’s livestream most of the night, and he made the point that the Democratics did a pretty good job of matching candidates to districts, or at least a better than expected job. I think it was one of his associates who made the point that Trump has been doing pretty well in Trumpifying the Senate. He was emphasizing how people were getting replaced, but I think it also true that former opponents like Graham and Cruz have become the strongest partisans. But this has seemingly been far less true (or not at all true) in the House.

* The Dems seem to think passing felony voting in Florida is a win.

Okay, 1.4 million felons have voting rights restored. Murderers and felony sex offenders don’t get it back.

418,000 blacks are disenfranchised in FL due to felonies. So about a million ‘new voters’ are Not Black.

But I’m thinking blacks are definitely over represented among murderers. Felony sex offenders maybe, but possibly not.

All this proves is that Democrats want felons voting because they think their party appeals to anti-social types. But there are all kinds of felons.

I’m pretty sure white felons who have done time are not the ‘wokest’ voters in the world. In fact, I’ll bet the white felons skew conservative BECAUSE they’ve done time.

The Hispanics, who knows, but I’m guessing Hispanic felons aren’t a high turnout group, if you know what I mean.

Either way, in raw numbers this seems like a net gain for the GOP in Florida.

* The small upside to this being that Kobach is now available to take a place in the Trump Admin – or maybe even Ruth Vader Ginsburg’s spot. Perhaps if she knows she can’t hang on another two years she will step down now. It would be hysterical for RINO’s to screw Kobach over only to watch in horror as Trump appoints him to the Supreme Court. It might be the greatest revenge of all time, even better than when Jeff Sessions won a Senate seat after being denied a federal judgeship.

Several open borders Republicans lost tonight. Mike Coffman is out in Colorado and Mia Love is out in Utah, and King appears to have held on in Iowa. It’s pretty fair to say that fighting for border security isn’t the huge negative people say it is, and is probably even a net plus.

* Kobach is just not a good natural politician. He’s a stiff and not very affable. He’s better as a behind the scenes enforcer type.

* “Paul Ryan is ostensibly a friend who can only make Trump look bad.
Pelosi is an enemy who can only make Trump look good.”

–Dennis Miller

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on Election Open Thread

NYT: ‘He Needs His Pretty Little Face Bashed In,’ a Therapist Tells an Undercover F.B.I. Agent

From the New York Times:

The New Jersey psychotherapist wanted revenge, and, as luck would have it, one of her patients had revealed in his therapy sessions that he was a former member of an organized criminal gang, according to a criminal complaint unsealed on Monday.

And that’s how the therapist, Diane Sylvia, ended up giving orders to an F.B.I. agent posing as a hit man to beat up someone who was blackmailing her, according to the complaint.

“He needs his pretty little face bashed in, that’s what I really want.”

“A broken arm would help, too.”

“Something so he can’t do push-ups, so he can’t work out.”

A licensed social worker who counsels individuals, couples and children in her office in Linwood, N.J., Ms. Sylvia, 58, was charged on Monday in federal court in Camden with one count of solicitation to commit a crime of violence. She was released on $50,000 bail. If convicted, she faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

From her page on Psychology Today:

Diane Sylvia, MSW,LCSW

As seen on a Sussex Directories Inc site

A little about my practice: I work with Individuals, Couples,Families and the Children involved in these relationships. My approach is that of the Family Systems Model. All relationships and states of mental health are affected by factors both present and past, including the environment in which we were raised. By strengthening our sense of self, we can restore functioning and create a life of positive satisfaction. Our words and thoughts are powerful and help create the life we desire. The most important component of therapy is the relationship between the client and therapist and the client’s willingness to make the decision to change.
I help people cope with every day stress, and most mental health conditions.Creating safe, supportive relationships is often the key to health. I also treat those with addictions (including Gambling) and their family members. Change is achieved by using a positive approach focused on setting and achieving personal goals.
PLEASE NOTE: I value your time. I request that you value mine. I have a limited number of appts per week. When booking your appt, you will be asked to provide your Credit Card Number. If the appointment is not held for any reason, the $125.00 fee will be charged to your card.
Call or Email Diane Sylvia, MSW,LCSW for a free phone consultation now – (609) 949-5127
Qualifications
Years in Practice: 23 Years
School: Rutgers Graduate School of Social Work
Year Graduated: 1993
License No. and State: 44SC04609500 New Jersey
Finances
Avg Cost (per session): $120 – $150
Accepts Insurance: Yes
Accepted Payment Methods: Cash, Check
Accepted Insurance Plans
Medicare
Out of Network
Verify your health insurance coverage when you arrange your first visit.
Additional Credentials
Certificate: National Association of Forensic Counselors / CDVC
Certificate Date: 2005
Membership: ICISF / Critical Incident Stress Mgt
Member Since: 2002

Posted in Psychology | Comments Off on NYT: ‘He Needs His Pretty Little Face Bashed In,’ a Therapist Tells an Undercover F.B.I. Agent

Live Election Results

Panel: https://twitter.com/Brundlefly14
https://en.rightpedia.info/w/Rodney_Martin



http://auis.academia.edu/OttoPohl

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on Live Election Results

How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm

Noah Carl writes in Evolutionary Psychological Science: “It is often asserted that, when it comes to taboo topics like race, genes and IQ, scholars should be held to higher evidentiary standards or even censored entirely because of the harm that might result if their findings became widely known. There is held to be an asymmetry whereby the societal costs of discussing certain topics inevitably outweigh any benefits from doing so. This paper argues that no such asymmetry has been empirically demonstrated, and that stifling debate around taboo topics can itself do active harm. To the extent that the paper’s argument has force, it cannot simply be taken for granted that, when in doubt, stifling debate around taboo topics is the ethical thing to do.”

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm

Scientific Racism

James Thompson writes:

“Scientific Racism” is an oxymoron. The truth cannot be racist, and lies cannot be science. If you say something truthful about a racial difference then that is true, not a lie, and not racism. If you say something about racial groups which is untrue, then that is not science, it is false, and science has to correct mistakes as soon as possible.

Scientific racism is a contradiction in terms.

Nonetheless, the epithet “scientific racism” is often thrown at any study of racial differences as if, whatever the outcome of the research, the mere investigation transgresses some a priori truths. The argument seems to be: “we know that racial differences do not exist, so those who argue against that view are wrong, whatever their investigations may suggest”. In simple terms, if a person can be considered a racist, then the fact that they “do science” is simply another one of their fiendish tricks. The scientific part becomes an additional outrage, a vain attempt to prove true something already known to be wrong.

The blanket condemnation of evidence-seeking is not always applied to differences which have medical connotations. Race-based differences in vulnerability to illnesses is often exempt from hostile criticism. A welcome respite. However, the evolutionary processes which affect the organs of the body are not guaranteed to leave the brain above the audit, somehow exempt from selection. If one genetic group differs in one regard it is worth studying if they differ in other regards.

It may not be obvious at first, but if you want to combat racism and sexism you need the benchmark of open discussion about racial and sexual differences. Otherwise, how do we know which claims about group differences are clearly wrong and which are right? These are empirical matters and you need to establish the truth before you can demonstrate what deviates from it. The most effective way to find the truth is free and open inquiry into all group differences. We should be on the side of those who want to know more, not those who want to know less. We should oppose those who want other people to know less, while they are free to find out as much as they can, and then decide what to hold back.

I know that some researchers will want to hold back findings which they believe will halt their careers. It is a tough choice. I sympathize with their dilemma, and look forward to the day when they can all publish their findings openly.

The study of racial differences has been criticized as pseudo-science. Of course, one should be against pseudo-science, as one should be against pseudo-journalism, and pseudo-outrage and pseudo everything. But why should one branch of science be called pseudo, and another not? All branches of science depend on maintaining scientific standards whatever the topic is. Any errors need to be corrected by better methods. There is as much scope for error when comparing racial groups as when comparing social class groups. Selection criteria are rarely pure, and can be subject to confounding.

We should aim for high standards in everything we investigate. One way to achieve that is to examine the ideas we love with as much ferocity as the ideas we find repellent. That will keep us closer to the truth.

COMMENTS:

* ALL you racist pseudoscientists will get RationalWiki articles.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Noah_Carl

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Edward_Dutton

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Davide_Piffer

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Jan_te_Nijenhuis

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/James_Thompson

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emil_Kirkegaard

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anatoly_Karlin

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Aurelio_J._Figueredo

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Michael_A._Woodley_of_Menie

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/London_Conference_on_Intelligence

* I’m reliably informed Emil Kirkegaard is suing Smith over his RationalWiki article and also some comments made elsewhere. However, Kirkegaard hasn’t done himself any favours. If you’re suing someone for alleged defamation – the worst thing you can do is create an article smearing the person you claimed has defamed you. I noticed Kirkegaard created an article on his website viscously attacking Smith filled with silly insults such as “he’s ugly”, dubious claims of mental illness and unemployment, that Smith has blocked on search-engines after sending legal complaints about defamation. According to Smith, he’s not living on welfare and isn’t mentally ill – Kirkegaard made all this up and doesn’t provide any evidence.

This will surely back-fire on Kirkegaard in court.

Posted in Race, Science | Comments Off on Scientific Racism

The Shame Of The ADL

The shame of this essay in Commentary magazine is that the author repeatedly calls the Mearsheimer/Walt book The Israel Lobby “shoddy” but never presents any examples of the alleged shoddiness. Pathetic. Those who can, do, and those who can’t, yell names.

That two highly respected elite political scientist would suddenly produce “shoddy” work in a charged issue that would hurt their lives and careers is absurd.

Seth Mandel writes:

And just at the moment that one of the twin pillars of American anti-Semitism was being laundered through the Democratic Party, Jonathan Greenblatt left the administration that enabled this bigotry to take the helm of the Anti-Defamation League.

Greenblatt took three hallmarks of Team Obama with him when he left: a belief that liberalism and modern morality were synonymous; an obsession with Benjamin Netanyahu; and a rivalrous antagonism toward anyone to his right who called out anti-Semitism.

The liberalism part of that isn’t unique to Greenblatt—the ADL has long supported abortion rights, which is not a “Jewish issue” in any way. But there are two puzzling aspects to Greenblatt’s behavior. First, he makes it personal. Immediately after Trump announced he would nominate to the Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh, Greenblatt went on the attack, tweeting that Kavanaugh’s record “does not reflect the demonstrated independence and commitment to fair treatment for all that is necessary to merit a seat on our nation’s highest court.”

Slandering a respected judge is so far beneath the ADL that Greenblatt’s behavior should’ve been a gut check for the group’s leadership. Additionally, as Jonathan Tobin pointed out at National Review, “the group’s haste showed that it had planned to oppose anyone nominated by Trump,” thereby making a leap into blind partisanship.

The second difference is an overt hostility to religious liberty—an absolutely dangerous gamble for a Jewish-rights group. It isn’t merely that Greenblatt publicly lamented June’s Supreme Court ruling in favor of a Christian baker’s First Amendment rights. It’s also the way the organization has embraced liberalism as a form of religion in itself. Thus the ADL in 2016 called opposition to abortion a “right-wing assault on religious diversity in reproductive freedom,” an Orwellian mangling of language and faith.

Greenblatt’s antipathy toward the elected Israeli government is perhaps even more out of character. In 2016, Netanyahu confronted the Palestinian demand that no Jews remain in a future Palestinian state, calling it “ethnic cleansing.” This is quite literally the definition of the phrase. But Greenblatt—again, it bears repeating, as the director of the Anti-Defamation League—took a long swing at Netanyahu with a full column in Foreign Policy magazine. Greenblatt wrote: “Like the term ‘genocide,’ the term ‘ethnic cleansing’ should be restricted to actually describing the atrocity it suggests—rather than distorted to suit political ends.”

This is nonsensical, but it’s worth pointing out the hypocrisy here as well. In late July, Greenblatt tweeted out an ADL video of two Holocaust survivors describing the trauma of being separated from their families by the Nazis. Greenblatt’s point was to draw a parallel to the Trump administration’s policy of separating migrant children from the adults who had carried them across the border. Greenblatt tweeted: “Miriam & Astrid were separated from their parents during the Holocaust. They know the trauma this causes. 38,000+ people signed the petition we delivered to @DHSgov & @TheJusticeDept demanding an end to zero tolerance & to reunite families they tore apart.”

As the Jewish activist Noah Pollak responded to Greenblatt: “ADL spent decades successfully shaming people who appropriated the Holocaust to serve contemporary political agendas,” yet it is now a “leading perpetrator” of this trope. In this case, the analogy is not only false, it is dangerously irresponsible, tying the president of the United States explicitly to Hitler—all after kicking sand at the Israeli prime minister for correctly calling a policy of the expulsion of all Jews from a state “ethnic cleansing.”

This pathological distaste for Netanyahu has proved problematic for the supposed anti-Semitism watchdog. On May 1, Netanyahu gave a televised presentation of Iranian deception regarding its nuclear program, thanks to intel gleaned from a mind-boggling Mossad operation in which agents broke into secret vaults in Tehran, evaded detection, and fled the country with “some 50,000 pages and 163 compact discs” covering “years of work on atomic weapons, warhead designs and production plans,” according to the New York Times.

Tommy Vietor, Obama’s National Security Council spokesman, went so far as to accuse the Jewish state of fabricating intelligence to satisfy its bloodlust, tweeting that “Trump is now cooking up intel with the Israelis to push us closer to a conflict with Iran. A scandal hiding in plain sight.” These horrifying words, retweeted nearly 2,500 times, would have been met with thunder by Foxman’s ADL. Greenblatt’s ADL remained silent. And the poison spreads.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on The Shame Of The ADL

WEHT To Drudge?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Is it just me or has Drudge moved more to the Left the last 18 months or so. For example, he sure has been touting all those fake polls showing Dems up by wide margins. It is subtle but it’s there.

* DrudgeReport is now pretty much in line with MSM in general. I noticed the shift about a year ago or so as well. I mentioned this to family members who support Trump and they agreed and had stopped going there. I have also seen posts on FreeRepublic about Drudge’s new left slant and all the replies agreed. It had to have happened after the election because Trump was praising Drudge during his election rallies two-plus years ago.

Posted in Matt Drudge | Comments Off on WEHT To Drudge?

NYT Says One In Three Black Men In Kentucky Is A Felon

I’d say that level of criminal behavior is a big problem that blacks must confront (apparently one in six black women in Kentucky are also felons). To the New York Times, the problem is that these criminals can’t vote.

News footage is racist!

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Cabrillo High has hosted student race riots between blacks and Latino’s many times before, most of which Latino’s won handily. Southern California in general, and Compton in particular, has been the battleground for an extremely successful ethnic cleansing campaign by Latino’s.

Compton is now around 80-85 % Latino, and still growing, as the last of the black folks get run out of town.

Since then, Compton’s formerly bankrupt and shuttered Martin Luther King Jr. hospital has re-opened, with new state-of-the-art medical equipment servicing our Latino’s, and many, many Mexican citizens newly arrived. Crime in Compton has dive-bombed, the dramatic decrease considered unprecedented. Latino’s in general, and Mexicans in particular like to have a nice day, which prohibits the indulgent behavior of black folks in their neighborhoods. HUD vouchers allow for blacks to move out of town relatively quickly, should they feel a sudden, urgent need.

CONCLUSION: Mexicans kids at Cabrillo High just took a minor setback, and targeted black kids can expect hell to pay going forward. Mexicans never forget, and can summon a remarkable measure of maliciousness, when called for. Some black kids at Cabrillo should either leave town yesterday, or they are going experience some ugly outcomes.

* An ignored aspect of Southern California’s gentrification has been the demographic shift in its prison system. In the 1970′s, California prisons were dominated by blacks. Today, they are dominated by many, many Mexicans, with blacks and white supremacists competing for second place.

In the black community, where it is reasonable a son or nephew will do time, this is a real threat to their safety. Maybe housing prices are the 21st century version of ethnic cleansing. But prison provides a more authentic, 13th century version.

* Armenians are a very interesting ethnic group. Sort of like a Middle Eastern mercantile ethnicity, but without Islam.

Very gaudy, cunning, and tribal. Also, pretty successful economically, especially in small business.

The Armenians (and Persians) are to SoCal what Italians are to NYC.

MORE STEVE SAILER COMMENTS:

* I think the Blue Wave might have happened with Dems winning every competitive Senate race and 50 House seats if the election were in early September.

The interrogation of a 53-year-old judge’s high school social and sex life by leading Dem senators, then the migrant caravan, made them look awful just as swing voters started to follow the midterm news.

I think people noticed the steady Maoist purge of people from their jobs that really picked up this year. And the purged were quite diverse: a beauty queen newslady, a young Google programmer nerd, the Jewish creator and star of the #1 scripted show on TV.

It’s only the left that violently attacks people engaged in political or intellectual debate in colleges.

You can find 100 instances of this. But there is not single one of conservatives trying to “shut it down” and “deplatform” leftists.

Posted in Blacks, California | Comments Off on NYT Says One In Three Black Men In Kentucky Is A Felon

#102 11-5-18 The Most Important Midterms In History

00:00 Kevin’s brutal six day stay in Edmonton
17:00 Edmonton Oilers look great this year!
28:00 Mid-term elections as a referendum on Trump
33:00 Nicole Wallace on white grievance
37:00 Neo-cons and the rise of anti-Semitism
1:07:00 Is Nate Silver done if he’s wrong about 2018 mid-term elections?
1:35:00 HIAS
1:47:00 Vichy France thrived
1:53:00 Book Club: Tucker Carlson’s Ship of Fools: How a Selfish Ruling Class Is Bringing America to the Brink of Revolution
1:55:00 The damage of Facebook, Silicon Valley moguls want to limit their kids’ use of social media
2:00:00 Jim Crow laws

* Nate Silver making excuses? Nate’s predictions. Polls

* James Kuntsler: “…it is imperative to keep the Democratic Party from the levers of power. If elected, they will convert a necessary and inescapable Fourth Turning into a game show replay of the French Revolution, with overtones of the Spanish Inquisition. We have not nearly seen the end of how insane a society can become under duress.”

* “Once is happenstance; twice is coincidence; three times is enemy action.” (Ian Fleming). The Progressives are this close to insurrection. The Guardian: The American civil war didn’t end. And Trump is a Confederate president Steve Sailer

* The Atlantic: Trump Is the Glue That Binds the Far Right

* Far-Right Internet Groups Listen for Trump’s Approval, and Often Hear It

* Stacy McCain: Why Do We Know Almost Nothing About Pittsburgh Gunman Robert Bowers?

* On Gab, domestic terrorist Robert Bowers engaged with several influential alt-right figures

* From the NYT story: “Stout learned to his horror that Spencer was planning a speech at the University of Florida. He spent weeks frantically trying to get up to speed, scouring far-right and anti-fascist websites and videos, each click driving him further into despair.” LOL

* “Hundreds of Jews” contact gun-training academy after Pittsburgh attack

* SNL mocks disabled veteran

* Gypsies versus Pakistanis in the North of England. Ain’t diversity grand? Steve Sailer

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on #102 11-5-18 The Most Important Midterms In History