How Did The Private Cathy Differ From The Public Cathy?

The Cathy I knew was much more vulnerable than her writings suggest. After listing off her complaints one night, she said to me, "This is where you say something supportive." Cathy Seipp was just as needy for tangible gifts on her birthday, such as flowers, as any woman. After we attended a party thrown by The Atlantic magazine (featuring Christopher Hitchens and Martin Amis), Cathy laughed about how intellectually out-classed she felt. She felt the same way after hanging out with Dr. Nick Gillespie.

Posted in Cathy Seipp | Comments Off on How Did The Private Cathy Differ From The Public Cathy?

I Am Eliot Stein

I am fat, weird and unpopular. I have Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I write parodies that I think are funny but normal people find despicable. I believe I pursue the truth but normal people see my quest as betrayal. As Robert J. Avrech wrote in the foreword to my book on Jewish journalism:

Betrayal fascinates Luke Ford. It’s his life. Luke betrayed his father, a prominent Seventh Day Adventist minister, when Luke converted to Judaism. Luke betrayed his second "father" when he sacrificed his friendship with Dennis Prager to work on an unauthorized biography of his hero. Luke betrayed Judaism when he became lukeford.com, the preeminent journalist covering LA’s sordid, mob-infested porn industry. Luke betrayed his Orthodox synagogue when he lied about his work and told the rabbi he was a "freelance journalist who writes about crime for a Japanese magazine." I know all this first hand because I was and am a member of a shul that kicked him out when the truth of his work in porn came to light. Luke and I sat together in Daf Yomi, the page-a-day Talmud study class, for close to a year. All this is amply and honestly documented in Luke’s second book: XXX-Communicated: A Rebel Without a Shul.

I was a stray dog that Cathy Seipp adopted. In the end, I urinated on her.

Posted in Cathy Seipp, Dennis Prager, Eliot Stein, Personal | Comments Off on I Am Eliot Stein

Tom Christie’s Tribute To Cathy Seipp

He writes in the LA Weekly:

She was “opinionated,” as everyone says, meaning both acerbic and politically conservative, and she could be difficult, sometimes absurdly so. But she was also a good and loyal friend, a devoted mother to 17-year-old Maia, a caring daughter to Harvey (who lives in the bottom half of her house in Silver Lake), a protector of stray dogs and humans alike, and she was very, very amusing, whether you were laughing with her or shaking your head at her in amazement. (I, for instance, had to stop going to PTA meetings when our kids were in grade school together because she would sit with me and then greatly embarrass me by standing and complaining about some terrible political correctness being perpetrated on our unsuspecting children — you know, some horror like recycling.)

Posted in Cathy Seipp | Comments Off on Tom Christie’s Tribute To Cathy Seipp

A child-porn-convicted rabbi tries to make amends as rabbi sex-abuse cases roil the Jewish community

Justin Clark writes in the LA Weekly:

As an Orthodox Jew, Heschel wasn’t accustomed to going to confession. Seven years ago, he was a highly respected rabbi at Mount Freedom Jewish Center, an Orthodox synagogue in Randolph Township, New Jersey. But he was also a lifelong porn addict, and his addiction peaked after he was shown how to use the synagogue’s computer. Two weeks before the High Holy Days, the synagogue’s computer technician discovered two pictures of child pornography that Heschel had viewed on an adult Web site. By enlarging the images, Heschel had unwittingly downloaded them to his Web browser’s temporary-file cache.

Posted in Abuse | Comments Off on A child-porn-convicted rabbi tries to make amends as rabbi sex-abuse cases roil the Jewish community

Daniel Pipes Talks With Rabbi David Wolpe At Sinai Temple

The event is scheduled for 8 p.m. March 29.

Rabbi Wolpe’s pointed introduction. Audio Audio

I arrive at 7:15 p.m. Sinai Temple’s foyer is filled and there’s a long line of cars waiting to get into the parking lot.

7:30 p.m. The doors to the sanctuary open and hundreds of us pour through. There’s a fighting over seats that I’ve never seen in a church.

One man, Gary*, describes another man as “mad.”

Gary and his wife page through the Etz Hayim chumash (Pentateuch) and share some dirty with a friend about sexual discharge.

I ask to look.

Gary and I start talking about the Iraq war. He supports it. “Any chance to kill Arabs.”

Temple Sinai cantor Joseph Gale sings the Star Spangled Banner and then a beautiful young woman sings Hatikva.

“Whoa, who is that woman?” I ask.

“We never had cantors like that in shul when I was a kid,” says Gary. “It makes you want to join up.”

His wife elbows him.

A World War II veteran gives a long introduction. “In the few minutes allowed to me,” he drones and there are titters and raised eyebrows around me.

Daniel Pipes says that we are in a war with radical Islam, not Islam in general and not terrorism. Our enemy is those Muslims who want to take over the world by force.

Pipes says that the Democratic candidates for president don’t talk about radical Islam. He says that John Kerry compared the problem of terrorism to other nuisances such as prostitution that will always be with us.

The Democrats are the party of 9/10 and the Republicans are the party of 9/12.

Pipes did not include the war in Iraq as part of the war on terror.

Forty five minutes into the talk, the crowd starts streaming out. Pipes is not a commanding speaker.

Posted in R. David Wolpe, Richard Pipes | Comments Off on Daniel Pipes Talks With Rabbi David Wolpe At Sinai Temple

Eliot Stein’s Online Lynching

Just before Cathy Seipp’s funeral, I remember various friends of hers boasting via email about what they would do if Eliot Stein showed up to the funeral (not that that was ever a possibility).

The best analogy I’ve heard about the anti-Eliot Stein hysteria of the past week is “when the popular clique in high school decided they were justified in unloading on the chubby kid in A/V class.”

Not that Stein is fat. He’s 6′ and 195 pounds.

Eliot Stein emails March 31:

Luke,

In high school I was the president of the A/V Club.
(no joke)

All of these people who have engaged in highly abusive and threatening emails, posts and phone calls do not realize that I have been enjoying the entire carnival. It’s like living in a Mad Magazine article and you’re on this month’s cover with Alfred E. Newman.

Let me quote my favorite philosopher regarding Freedom of Speech:

“You have the Constitutional right not to be offended.”

Author: Cathy Seipp

Over the past few days, I’ve gotten to know Eliot Stein and some of those around him. I believe he’s harmless.

Under the guise of helping Maia, some of my friends encouraged her to feel outraged about Stein’s parody to the point where she endorses the most vicious hate speech against Eliot Stein (e.g. Emperor Misha).

Not that anyone can blame her considering what was done to her and her mom and her friends on Stein’s disturbing website cathyseipp.com.

Yes, Stein concocted on cathyseipp.com a death bed confession from Cathy Seipp recanting her political views and calling her daughter a twit.

It was in appalling taste. But Eliot Stein never encouraged any harm to befall Cathy and Maia. He never interfered in their lives (outside of his online parody). He didn’t try to get Cathy fired from any jobs. He did nothing directly to harm either of them.

But now we have numerous blogs baying for Stein’s blood.

I sense that I’ve lost a lot of friends recently because I’ve presented a dispassionate view of Cathy Seipp on my blog (as I have from day one of knowing her, my approach has not changed) and sought out the views of her enemies as well as her friends.

Cathy’s family was not the only one hurt when she and Maia launched their online battle with Eliot Stein. They did considerable damage to Stein’s family and friends.

Doesn’t anyone understand how inflammatory it is to accuse a teacher of seeking an inappropriate relationship with his 14 year old student?

If Stein had been interviewed when this dispute went down, or at least been allowed to post his point of view on Cathy and Maia’s blogs, then the fight would never have gotten so ugly.

Armed Liberal comments:

Luke, it’s obvious that you don’t have kids.

Cathy was (and still is, to be honest) fair game. She stood, and her words stand, on their own and need no defense (and she would have been pissed if anyone had tried).

Her daughter – and any kid – wasn’t and isn’t. Period, full stop, no excuses, no exceptions, thank you for playing.

Maia was 14 or 15 when she chose (upon Cathy’s advice) to kick off this war with a blog post and to complain to her school (rather than first trying to work things out with Eliot Stein, her teacher). In the eyes of Judaism (and in my eyes), this is an adult. She’s responsible for her actions and for their consequences.

After Maia’s initial post, Cathy Seipp then chose repeatedly to keep this war alive (after Stein had stopped going after her). Both Cathy and Maia denied Eliot Stein a right to say his piece on their blogs.

I think much of Stein’s postings were in bad taste, particularly the last one while Cathy was dying, but I never recall him advocating any sort of physical harm to Cathy or Maia, which is more than you can say for the anti-Eliot Stein crowd online.

This week Eliot Stein offered to give CathySeipp.com to Maia if the two of them would sign a non-disparagement agreement. This war could’ve come to an end.

What happened?

Emperor Misha 1 made the most vile post and, apparently, a “Maia Lazar” (I believe it is Cathy’s daughter) posted a comment cheering it on.

I’m not a partisan in this dispute. I don’t object to Maia slamming her teacher on her blog and I don’t object to Eliot Stein slamming Maia on his blog. I have no dog in this fight.

What I object to is the one-sided characterization of this fight that portrays Cathy and Maia as innocent victims. Not true. They were participants in an online feud that got ugly.

(Yeah, one side may be more wronged than the other but the calculation is close.)

Cathy once told me a story of complaining to producer Al Burton about Maia’s fat teacher or principal (I don’t think this was Eliot Stein). She said she didn’t know what to do.

“I’d take him to lunch,” said Burton.

“Good idea,” Cathy admitted, but as she told me, it was not her style.

Charles Johnson at LittleGreenFootballs.com makes this absurd post:

I saw this happen in real time and exchanged emails with other friends of Cathy Seipp, but I didn’t post anything about it because I didn’t want to increase the pain for Cathy’s daughter.

But it was the absolute lowest, most despicable thing I’ve ever seen an obsessed leftist do, and that’s saying plenty.

Second movement responds: “Shame on Eliot Stein for behaving so despicably after Cathy’s death, and shame on Charles Johnson for turning this into a political matter. “The Despicable Left”? Give me a break. …It’s shamelessly exploitative of Cathy’s memory to call a personal conflict like this “political”, and you know it.”

Here are some of the reactions I’ve received on my Stein interview:

Ray Richmond posts on my blog: “I am flabbergasted that you are committed to legitimizing someone who a week ago willfully slandered Cathy Seipp.”

Emmanuelle Richard comments on my blog:

What are you trying to do, Luke, being all warm and fuzzy with Mr. Stein?

I’m generally fond of cyber pioneers and other (oddball online journalists who came of age in the 90s) but Mr. Stein’s tales of audacity and innovation are forever tainted by his unlawful and nauseating online behavior towards Cathy and Maia. Unless he decides to do the right thing: apologize to Maia and give her CathySeipp.com.

Jim Treacher writes: “It’s like Rain Man interviewing my Uncle Phil (he was convinced he invented dolphins).”

Bookish posts on my blog:

I don’t understand why anyone, let alone a supposed "friend" of Cathy’s would take such an interest in a venomous twit as this Stein character. "Stein is an interesting story, love him or hate him?" Thanks, Judith Regan‚ interesting to whom? The readers of YOUR blog? Doubtful. Seeing as your supposed (and I assume by now, FORMER) "friends" are even posting here to share how disgusted they are by your interview, I doubt "interesting" is the right word. Infuriating, maybe. Is their disappointment some sort of sick thrill for you? And speaking of sick, a little newsflash for "Rose" free speech does not make Stein any less of a bastard, or his behavior somehow acceptable or "OK." It’s not OK. It’s TWISTED. Anyone who would take a personal vendetta to such extremes is clearly a demented individual, any way you slice it.

Eliot Stein is not a liberal. He’s a centrist and a conservative Democrat. But this does not stop right-wing bloggers from trying to make political hay from the guy.

Anyone who argues that Stein’s behavior is representative of liberals is more of a hater than a thinker.

From Demtraitors.com: “This is just another example of a mentally diseased leftist who has not one shred of decency or morality in his decrepit body. This story will leave you disturbed and appalled at what we have come to expect from the extreme left these days.”

This forum thread on the Fox News story is titled “Hate Like A Liberal.”

Pajamas Media blogger Damian P. calls Stein “mentally unstable” and suggests he blog for The Huffington Post.

Damian comments “at least he isn’t teaching anymore.” But he is.

Les Enfants Terrible blogs about Eliot Stein: “Liberals truly are the nastiest people on earth.”

I challenge a fair-minded person to read my Eliot Stein interview and the Fox News story and anything else they want and then decide who’s nasty.

A lot of people, such as Emperor Misha 1, mock Stein’s claim of being an internet pioneer. But Stein was, whether you like it or not. That’s a fact. Eliot could not have been more open in our interview and his claims are verifiable. So far, I’ve discovered nothing Stein’s claimed for himself that does not check out.

Emperor Misha 1 files his entry on Stein under “Useless Swine.”

Emperor Misha 1, who boasts about being right-wing, blogs:

Take a look at the fat, stalking loser’s website.

I’ve seen better website designs done by mentally disabled orangutans (and their "about" pictures looked better too), and as to your 1337 PhotoShopping 5k|11z, Eliot, could you do something about the aforementioned picture?

I mean, painting a black wig on yourself with the brush tool and cranking the "blur" filter up to 12 isn’t exactly impressive.

Heck, even Adnan Hajj is more accomplished than that.

How do you like your newfound publicity, you evil, loathsome, psychotic ghoul?

Still like picking on kids? We assume that you only like "picking" on them although, with sickos like you, you never can tell. Especially not when they like to brag about their skills as, er, "teachers."

The best is yet to come. Still wanna play, sicko?

Emperor Misha 1 posts again:

Intentional infliction of emotional distress, anyone?

Oh, but I don’t want that fat, filthy, disgusting, incompetent sack of pig semen to merely get sued. Oh no, I want the fat fuck to die. Slowly, painfully and screaming for mercy. I want him to suffer all the torments of Hell before he goes there, as a matter of fact I want Hell to be a relief for him when he finally snuffs it and leaves this world a better place than it was while he was still stealing oxygen. I want him to suffer in such mind-crushingly, indescribably horrid ways that he’ll be begging for the courage to kill himself just to make it end, only to realize that he‚Äôs too much of a fat, failed, worthless coward to do even that. Then I want him to suffer some more.

I want him to vomit and shit himself in unutterable horror, I want his limbs to fall off in rotten piles of pus, one by one, I want his eyeballs to rot and melt and run down his fat, flabby cheeks, I want his teeth to fall out, his guts to liquefy slowly, and his lungs to gradually fill with foul, malodorous slime.

I want everything bad, painful and ugly this world holds to befall him, repeatedly, and I want him to be fully awake and conscious while it’s happening to him. I want his property taken from him, his identity stolen, his friends, if friends he has, to spit on him, turn away and never speak to him again, I want everything that he values to turn to shit before his crying eyes, I want every single one of G-d’s creations to inflict pain upon him, hate him and do what they can to destroy him.

And then, when he has suffered enough that all is taken from him, that he has turned utterly insane with grief and pain, when his every breath is spent begging for the sweet release of death, then I want him to die. Alone. KNOWING that he is alone and forgotten and that not even a mangy dog will turn up for his funeral.

Then, and only then, can Shaitan have him.

Maia Lazar responds: “Thanks Misha! If only one could do that in real life without consequences. My mom often wished her cancer on Trolldolls when she was in pain.”

Hang-Right Politics blogs:

Beware of former journalist teachers with a grudge. That’s my message to anyone who could be a prospective employer of Eliot Stein, who performed what amounts to be the most despicable act against Cathy Seipp, who died after a long battle with cancer last week. I’m glad, for my part, that Seipp’s friends took action as soon as they found out about it. I still think he should face the music publicly. A very well said "Go to Hell" is never enough for jerks of that caliber.

BitsBlog calls Stein a “slimeball” and adds: “I have been called a harsh, on occasion, while commenting on people who have died. There is a major difference, however, between being a harsh critic, and being an utter tool. for example, while I have been extraordinarily harsh on John Edwards and his wife, and I am still suspicious that their whole deal is a ruse designed to gather sympathy votes…”

Russ Harris emails:

Hey Ford: Who are you kidding when you say. “Eliot Stein is not a liberal. He’s a centrist and a conservative Democrat. But this does not stop right-wing bloggers from trying to make political hay from the guy.” Are you merely a pathological liar or just another libtard without a clue? Apparently you knowledge of the party of the Seditious & Sleazy (a.k.a. Democrats) is about as in depth as your of Stein, absolute zero… Then you go onto give us what you think is a sterling resume of Stein: USA Today, Time, Entertainment Tonight, yada, yada, yada… This caps it since you think that these outfits are credible… You Ford are a fool… Thanks for playing and thanks for showing us just what you are…

From Bile, Snark and Sneer:

MEET ELIOT STEIN, a talentless, left-wing, stalker- perv LOSER who cyber-squatted his puffy, rancid ass onto the poached domain name of cathyseipp.com and put up a horrid, libelous letter while masquerading as Cathy as she tragically lay dying of cancer.

TRY as we might with GOOGLE, we can’t find anything up under this c**ksucker’s name to go after- if anybody has anything, please let know so we can share in the dog-pile on this miserable bastard and bury him with a DDOS attack.

Eliot Stein emails:

Luke,

I was just looking at the mail and saw a link to your article about me. What can I say? It’s very, very fair.

Here are some answers for you which you may post:

1. My www.eliotstein.com website went up the night before the article on Fox News. I figured there would be a response. And there has been. I had NEVER had that domain active. It is the first time. At the last minute, I put it up using a basic page web designer. I am a CONTENT PRODUCER. I AM CONCERNED WITH WHAT IS BEING SAID. I do not design websites. At AOL and CompuServe I had professionals to take care of all of that for me and my company. I no longer work there. At midnight, I did not have a web designer handy.

2. I was in USA Today, on Entertainment Tonight, Time Magazine, Yahoo! Internet Life Magazine, a number of major newspapers and countless radio stations that all featured stories on what I was pioneering at the time. Call Steve Case of AOL. Or call Mark Cuban (who I created the first live audio celebrity interviews for). Or maybe the folks would like to see a pretty huge check from these organizations? It is what it is. Anybody that was involved in the business side of the Internet from 1982-2000 knows about it. Call Roger Ebert and ask him about the “Showbiz Forum” on CompuServe. It is absurd to have people tell me what I did or did not do. BETTER YET…if any of these people would like to place a HIGH STAKES WAGER on the subject–we will have a neutral attorney hold the money of both parties–then each will present their evidence–and the winning party will obtain the jackpot. ARE THERE ANY TAKERS? I can prove every single statement made on my website regarding my successful Internet history.

3. It is amazing to me that all these people who have been mocking, libeling, defaming, ridiculing and attacking others from their own blogs, suddenly believe that one person doesn’t have the same right–simply because the subject–who had done some of the most vicious written attacks on the Internet–was on her way to being reincarnated–probably as an anteater. “Freedom of Speech For Me…But Not For Thee.”

Posted in Eliot Stein | Comments Off on Eliot Stein’s Online Lynching

The Jewish Press Launches A Blog

Editor Jason Maoz goes after Jewschool.com:

Last week the left-wing blogger Mobius (the alias used by Dan Sieradski in his role as proprietor of the Jewschool blog) reacted with some indignation to Steven Plaut’s inaugural post on this blog. That’s Mobius’s right, of course, and I have no issue with that. My problem is with his predictably dishonest characterization of The Jewish Press. After dispensing with the obligatory insult (he calls us “America’s trashiest Orthodox Jewish newspaper”), he writes that the paper is “renowned for excusing the improprieties of rabbinic child molesters and instead attacking their whistleblowers…”

How dishonest is Mobius? The Jewish Press has never — not once — excused any abuser or molester, rabbinic or otherwise. The fact is, the paper has for years run articles, columns and features on all manner of abuse in the Orthodox community — in the face of a number of cancelled subscriptions and threats of advertiser boycotts by people who don’t think an Orthodox newspaper should publicize such sordid reality. (In fact, it was in response to reader discomfort that the paper several years ago moved articles of that nature into a pullout section so that concerned parents could easily separate it from the rest of the paper.)

Mobius’s disingenuousness is further indicated by his use of a hyperlink when he refers to The Jewish Press’s attacks on whistleblowers — but not when he refers to our alleged “excusing…of rabbinic child molesters. ” The reason for that should be obvious — he can’t find any such link.

While the paper has indeed editorialized against granting legitimacy to anonymous accusations and anonymous fliers containing unsubstantiated charges, it has, as noted above, never excused abuse or abusers. But by placing that lie in the same sentence with the hyperlinked reference to our editorial stance against anonymous accusations, Mobius plants the impression in readers’ minds that both statements are accurate.

That Mobius knows better can be ascertained by his own words. Last May, The Jewish Press ran an op-ed piece, written by a concerned New Jersey mother, titled “Education Without Strings.” The article minced no words in criticizing yeshivas on a variety of fronts — including their lack of accountability in hiring teachers with questionable backgrounds.

Here’s a relevant section of the piece: “We are all aware of the current controversies involving teachers with questionable backgrounds — controversies that often include allegations of verbal, physical, and sexual abuse. Why are we exposing our children to teachers who have been accused but not investigated? What if allegations about an individual teacher happen to be true and our children are being abused under our very noses? Why isn‚Äôt someone stepping up and saying this is unacceptable? Why are parents who complain about a teacher‚Äôs abusive behavior to school authorities likely to be told, ‘If you don‚Äôt like it here, go to another yeshiva’?

“Who is seeing to it that allegations are investigated rather than swept under the rug? Why are community members using anonymous public letters as a last resort to bring attention to the matter? Anonymous letters can get out of hand and hurt innocent people. If we had a central, objective committee to whom we could turn, these problems would be addressed without the need to resort to extreme measures. Does anyone doubt that if a string of accountability were tied to school funding, things like this would no longer go on?”

Two days after the article first appeared on our website and in our print edition, Mobius posted the following comment on his blog, followed by a link to the article in question:

Demanding Accountability From Yeshivot by Mobius // May 26th, 2006 Education My sister L‚Äôvia wrote an op-ed in this week‚Äôs Jewish Press, which, responding to the recent Kolko controversy, presents a laundry list of concerns from Orthodox parents about how their money‚Äôs being spent and who‚Äôs being allowed to teach their children…

Well, who’d have thunk it? Leave aside the delicious irony that the writer of the article we were glad to run happened to be Mobius’s very own sister. Did you notice that Mobius himself made the point that the piece was a response “to the recent Kolko controversy”? And how come he didn’t call us “America’s trashiest Orthodox Jewish newspaper” when he was trumpeting our publication of his sister’s article?

If Mobius were sincere, and even if he knew nothing else about The Jewish Press (which of course he does), just the fact that we would feature an article like the one written by his sister should have been enough to disabuse him of any notion that we were interested in whitewashing or “excusing” abuse in the Orthodox community. In fact, I can’t think of any other mainstream Orthodox publication that would have published his sister’s article. And her piece was only one of dozens we’ve run in recent years addressing problems all too many Orthodox Jews would rather ignore.

But what do I know? I’m just the senior editor of “America’s trashiest Orthodox Jewish newspaper” (the one that ran the article by Mobius’s sister that Mobius was only too proud to plug).

Posted in Jewschool, The Jewish Press | Comments Off on The Jewish Press Launches A Blog

Jewish Philanthropist Found Liable For Stealing Funds From Widow

From AXcess News:

(AXcess News) Los Angeles – Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Henry W. Shatford ordered Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM) founder Neil Kadisha to pay over $100 million in damages for embezzling funds, calling Kadisha a "common thief" after being found guilty of stealing funds from a widow. The case arose from Kadisha’s actions while a trustee of funds earmarked for Dafna Uzyel, the widow of Kadisha’s friend, and her young children. The trusts, which gave Kadisha effective control over Uzyel’s assets, were established at the urging of Kadisha and his personal attorney who represented both Kadisha, as trustee, and Uzyel, as beneficiary – creating a conflict of interest. The case was conducted over more than seven years, including four in trial. "This well-supported and articulate decision by Judge Shatford marks the culmination of a highly complex four year trial and resulted from a Herculean effort to uncover Kadisha’s perjury, backdating of documents and embezzlements as a trustee for personal gain, without regard to the welfare of the beneficiaries," said Samuel Krane of Krane & Smith in Encino, the lead trial attorney, who, along with Linda Rottman of Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps represented, Dafna Uzyel and her two children, Izzet and Joelle. Deceptions uncovered at Kadisha’s trial included back-dated trial documents and promissory notes, million dollar "loans" to nonexistent individuals, and intentionally misleading accountings of millions of dollars in embezzled funds, some of which was used to buy Qualcomm stock.

Neal Kadisha is one of the richest people in the Persian Jewish community and in LA Jewish life. He is married to Dora, a daughter of the wealthy Persian Nazarian family.

Posted in Neal Kadisha | Comments Off on Jewish Philanthropist Found Liable For Stealing Funds From Widow

Fox News: ‘As Cathy Seipp Lay Dying, Her Nemesis Took His Parting Shot on the Web’

Michael Park writes on FoxNews.com:

Just hours before her death, Cathy Seipp suddenly seemed to undo decades of hard work with an oddly written letter posted on the Web site, www.cathyseipp.com. In what came off as more bizarre rant than heartfelt apology, her supposed very last blog entry called her years of journalism a "shoddy," "despicable" and "irresponsible‚" career as a "fourth-rate hack." Her political stance? All a mistake. The fiery, unwavering supporter of George W. Bush supposedly said she’d done a complete 180 in the past year and was now an implied supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.

Eliot Stein replies to my inquiry:

The article on Fox News was overall done fairly. It presented all the parties and many different aspects of the issues involved. The writer left out all the untrue "hearsay" that Cathy Seipp and her Daughter worked so hard to "imply." Could it have been better? Yes. Fox left out the part that mother Seipp and daughter Seipp had teamed up to libel and defame on the Internet yet another teacher just six months earlier. Fox didn’t present transcript examples of many of the vicious attacks Seipp made on people throughout the last few years. Fox didn’t mention that just 90 days before she passed away, Seipp was well enough to start-up new attacks on me–when my site about her was DOWN. She was just one more right-wing Conservative Neocon whose motto is "Freedom Of Speech For Me…But Not For Thee."

Eliot Stein writes on EliotStein.com:

Cathy Seipp was a blogger who spent the last five years of her life maliciously and viciously defaming, libeling, berating, ridiculing and mocking everybody she came in contact with. She even taught her daughter to do the same on her own blog. The two of them would attack members of the media, teachers, administrators, schools, politicians, store owners, waiters and waitresses and in general, anybody they felt deserved to be reprimanded by their megalomaniacal delusions. Discredited as serious writers because of their "yellow journalism" techniques of innuendo, sensationalism and manipulation, they demonstrated a lack of morals and decency in their unethical activities. When I left the entertainment industry to go into teaching, I agreed to set up a top notch journalism and broadcasting department at a top private school in Los Angeles. What I didn’t know was that mom and daughter had previously mounted a major libel and defamation campaign on the Internet against one of the school’s teachers, who quit and was now suing the school. I also didn’t know that when Cathy Seipp’s daughter was to be removed from my journalism class on the request of all the other students (it was unanimous) and the school’s administration, that mom and daughter would then conspire to create their newest libel and defamation Internet campaign against me. [By the way–I placed ONE PHONE CALL to the daughter. Informing her of what was going on; telling her of my support for her; asking her what we should do. Her suggestion was that she have "less power" and that way it would not bother the other students as much. The following day was parent’s night. I went in front of a room of parents and told them "you must have your children respect my selection of Editor of this paper." Despite these efforts, Cathy and daughter did not want to be humiliated by the daughter being removed as Editor and decided I would be their scapegoat. The ONE PHONE CALL suddenly became, "He calls my daughter at home," a typical Cathy Seipp character assassination technique–don’t explain things–leave it up to the reader’s imagination. They didn’t know that they picked the wrong person this time. Because I had been involved in professional broadcasting and journalism for 20 years, I had developed a keen sense of humor and comedy and decided to show them just what satire and parody was on the Internet as well-with them as the focus. As they established themselves as "public figures," I was able to express my opinions about their opinions-something mom and daughter were not accustomed to. The last piece of parody I ever published was "Cathy’s Final Blog Entry." In that creative piece of satire, Cathy admits to having become a registered Democrat and encourages everybody else to do the same. Anybody reading it knows that it is satirical and a parody. The man from the newspaper asked me, "Wasn’t that really over-the-top considering she was dying?" Here is my response. When Cindy Sheehan, the brave mother who decided to turn her son’s death in Iraq into a national issue against the war and against President Bush, Cathy Seipp wrote a real editorial in which she says that Cindy Sheehan was just being "maudlin." The definition of "maudlin" is overly sentimental; foolishly sentimental; schmaltzy. For Cathy Seipp to say that Cindy Sheehan was being overly-sentimental (when she just lost her son in Iraq) was despicable. THAT was OVER THE TOP. Not a satirical/parody piece about a woman who spends her life defaming and libeling innocent people. If I ever wanted to go into detail about everything I know about mom and daughter, most people would be appalled and shocked. But it’s finished. I will leave it with just this notice for now. Cathy is gone. And as far as I’m concerned, this is all over and done with. The daughter now has the opportunity to just end things in good faith, forever, with just a simple legal agreement between all parties covering the halting of any past, present and future ramblings–and she can even have the domain with no strings attached. That’s all I wish for now and hopefully I will see some mutually positive efforts on her part.

Posted in Cathy Seipp, Eliot Stein, Satire | Comments Off on Fox News: ‘As Cathy Seipp Lay Dying, Her Nemesis Took His Parting Shot on the Web’

Eliot Stein Interview

Maia Lazar’s former journalism advisor launched eliotstein.com this week.

Here is his bio.

I talked to Eliot for almost two hours Tuesday evening about his career on the internet.

Part One Audio Part Two Part Three Part Four Part Five Part Six Part Seven

Pics: Eliot Stein with Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys Eliot Stein with humorist Dave Barry

Eliot: “There was a time when I got a lot of press. I was on Entertainment Tonight. I was in USA Today. I was in numerous newspapers around the country. Magazines.

“I had a master’s degree in Education Technology [from San Diego State, graduating in 1976 when Eliot was 22]. I was one of the first people who got my hands on a computer that had a screen on it.

“They had for many years these computers that had these processing batch cards. If you can imagine the horrors of having thousands of cards processing to do a simple test…

“San Diego State got one of the first computer screen systems with a terminal. You could write and see it on the screen.

“They started this master’s degree in educational technology. They brought this computer into the department. It was connected to a few other colleges in California. Because of the education department, no teacher would go near it. They were scared to death of this little machine.

“I sat down and gave the thing a try. Within a few days, I was writing programs in the language of basic. ‘Some day,’ I said, ‘this will be used in every library.’ Those people laughed at me.

“I wrote this program where you could write in the name of the book you wanted and information would come back about where it was stored and it was due on this date… They said, ‘This is never going to happen. People are always going to go to little card catalogues.’

“They decided I would write something that had never been done before. I would write the first program to teach teachers how to use a computer.

“You’d sit down, type in your name, and the computer would say, ‘Hello, Mrs. Smith. How are you?’

“That was my master’s project.

“I had done television and radio in San Diego. One summer, I had a local television show with rock bands. I was the host.
“I came up to Los Angeles in the late seventies. I did stand-up comedy. I got into SAG and AFTRA. I had a talking part on General Hospital.

“I was driving one day and I had an idea — what if somebody could go to a movie and write a review coming out of that movie and everybody could see it instantaneously.

“I started checking around.

“I had an Atari 400. It played Pacman. It had Missile Command. And it had a programming cartridge in it. I got hold of this company called Compuserve. They had stocks and news and sports online. That’s it. The service was basically for stockbrokers to get instant quotes.

“I sat down with somebody and came up with a program that could access Compuserve. I couldn’t afford an expensive terminal. Soon there was going to be the Commodore 64 that could access it.

“I called Compuserve and made a proposal. ‘How would you like entertainment news, movie reviews, celebrity interviews, showbiz games and anything entertainment instantaneously for these people reading the stock reports…’

“Some executives there said, ‘I think they’d like that.’

“Within a few weeks, I had a business going called ‘Hollywood Hotline.’ It was in the black within two months. I was able to hire people. We had a guy in New York write reviews of stage plays.

“It was the world’s first show business accessible system.

“Compuserve was really pushing. They had Rush Limbaugh do commercials pushing it. He’d talk about Hollywood Hotline.

“My business is getting bigger and bigger.

“I’d bring a little portable Atari 800 and a modem to studios. I’d set it up and I’d show this to publicity departments and the TV networks. The response was ho hum. ‘This is never going to make it.’

“Time magazine came out with an article in 1983 saying, ‘Hey folks, there’s something happening out there and it’s called Compuserve.’

“We had soap opera stories. People were joining up so they could get their soap opera summaries.

“One day in 1985, I got a call. ‘Hello Eliot, my name is Steve Case. I have a business called Quantum Link.’

“You could only get on to it with a Commodore 64 computer.

“‘We want you to provide us with all the entertainment stuff that you’re providing Compuserve, however, we are going to give you more money and you are going to provide more stuff for us.’

“Sure, Steve.

“I started asking about stock and the word was no. ‘You’re an independent contractor. It’s your company and we’re hiring your company to handle all the entertainment content.’

“People say to me, ‘If you were from day one with Compuserve and AOL, why aren’t you living in Bel Air?’

“The answer is, I asked them and the answer was no.

“In three years, we are on AOL and Compuserve and we are it. We are the whole online instantaneous entertainment service.

“Calls start coming in from competitors. Western Union started a company that you could pull off their teletypes. Delphi.

“Then a big company came along called General Electric and they started GEnie. They pumped millions of dollars to compete. They called us and we set up on their systems…

“We hear from NBC and CBS about secret projects — NBC Teletext. CBS Extravision.

“You know how on your tv if the picture starts rolling you have a black bar? They figured out how to take that black bar and put information in it, open it up all the way as big as the picture on your TV. They started giving this to hundreds of people around the United States. They were sending news, weather and sports and guess who was handling all the entertainment? Hollywood Hotline.

“NBC said to me, ‘We’re setting up a little box for you. You come down here and pick up our information. We can’t afford the postage.’

“I’m in my thirties. I was very good looking in my thirties. I’d go down there every day and all the women, young and old, would start flirting with me. They’d stop what they were doing and hang around me.

“NBC decided to cut me off from coming down. ‘There’s too much chaos when you come down here.’

“We had all these hot items we’d send out every day and we’d have all these radio stations using our items and not giving us credit.

“We started syndicating our items to radio stations.

“We put out our thing late one day and Entertainment Tonight called and asked, ‘Where is your service today?’”

“I’ve been using email since 1982. I showed it to people and they said it was stupid. Until about 1995, they were telling me that nobody was going to use email.”

“Compuserve was given the chance to buy AOL and turned it down.

“In 1994, Compuserve asked me to go exclusive with them and I said goodbye to everybody else.”

“I’ve been a visionary. The things that everybody takes for granted now online — movie reviews, celebrity interviews (whether text or audio), I did that first, interactive games, movie promotions (I did the first one for 1992’s Sneakers with Robert Redford, we had the director and some of the cast online, I proposed it to Universal)…

“I asked Compuserve early on to go audio. They got a department to start working on it. A company called broadcast.com was working on that and we linked up with them for the first major live celebrity interviews — steinonline.com.

“It was the thing I’m most proud of. It was a daily 90-minute to two hours live radio interview show from a little studio I built in Burbank. You could pick up almost any newspaper and see the listings for the guests coming on. I was doing Larry King on the internet.”

“My company keeps getting bigger. We’re getting press.”

“I was the first person to put a movie review online. It was for Gandhi.”

“People were constantly calling and kissing up to me to try to get them on the front page, to do promotions.”

“I said, let’s all watch the Oscars around the world on Compuserve and comment… For four hours, people wrote the funniest, most sarcastic comments… We did give-aways.

“I started an interactive forum which most people call a blog these days. The Showbiz Forum. It was the only place online to discuss entertainment. You’d leave messages and people would respond. We could put up pictures and documents.

“Within a few years, Roger Ebert came on. Ed Asner. Jerry Brown. Buddy Epsen. Bob Denver.”

“In 1994, the internet becomes a challenge to Compuserve and AOL.”

“AOL out-marketed Compuserve. By 1997, AOL went past Compuserve in subscribers.”

“When the internet starts, there are few websites. I was under an exclusive contract. I could only provide services to Compuserve. I could not open up my own things on the internet. I gave my loyalty to this company. I’d been with them since 1982. They were going to take care of me forever. They paid me well and gave me any equipment I wanted.
“The day I got real worried was in 1998 when Yahoo added the news to its home page. I called up executives at Compuserve and said I was very concerned. We don’t have a presence on the internet. What’s going to prevent Yahoo from adding sports, weather and entertainment? An executive snapped at me. ‘We know what’s happening with the internet. We are not worried about the internet. We know how to handle this.’

“In 2000, steinonline.com (after three years) came to an end.”

“The greatest moment for me was Brian Wilson.”

“I had on a woman who was part of the French resistance in World War II.

Annette Funicello. She had trouble talking [because of her MS]. I was in tears by the end of that interview.”

“I’ve done over 10,000 interviews in my life. It’s one thing I’m good at. I can get very funny, very clever and I can get dead serious. I know how to get information out of people.”

“I had people who were in the first wave at D-Day.”

“In 2000, AOL purchased Compuserve. I got a letter saying we want you to continue providing your services to Compuserve but we’re not going to pay you anymore. They were afraid of the media picking up on AOL getting rid of Compuserve people who’d been there a long time.

“I had a staff of about 15 people. I turned it over to an assistant. They paid him a few hundred dollars a week.

“I spent about a year working out a deal with Yahoo to put out the biggest audio entertainment program out of Los Angeles that the world had ever seen. Then Terry Semel came in and he changed the model of Yahoo.”

“I started the world’s first interactive forum devoted to oldies music.”

“We weren’t that controversial. Our news service that went out daily was pretty much positive information. We didn’t get into gossip until the interactive forum.

“I broke the story on Hollywood Hotline that Rock Hudson had AIDS. A day before [Amy Archerd in] Variety. We knew we were taking a chance with that. We did it anyway.”

Luke: “What were the smartest things and the dumbest things you did?”

Eliot: “The smartest thing was to stick with it.”

“My favorite idol, Paul McCartney, produced a 1984 movie called, ‘Give My Regards To Broad Street.’

“When my wife and I got there, there were thousands of screaming girls. Paul McCartney steps out of a limo with his wife Linda. He brushes by me. He sits in front of me in the theater.

“When the movie ended, and it wasn’t all that great, and people didn’t know what to do. I started applauding wildly and everybody else followed. I made Paul McCartney feel good.”

In 1989, Eliot got his P.h.D. from the American Institute of Hypnotherapy.

When he ran out of money in 2002, Eliot became a high school teacher (History and English).

“I plan to get something else going with interviews.”

Luke: “What’s the story with you and Roy Masters?”

Eliot: “I used to syndicate celebrity interviews. He used to purchase them for his magazine New Dimensions. I heard him on the radio. He seemed sincere. He helped people.

“He’s up in Grants Pass, Oregon. They said to me, ‘You’ve got to come up here one weekend. You’ll see this and you’ll want to stay.’

“I go up there with my wife and my child. I had never seen anything so beautiful.

“A few months later, in 1989, we packed our bags and moved up to Grants Pass. I could run things electronically.

“I find out Roy Masters owns this 100,000 watt FM talk radio station. Roy buys time all over the United States.

“I host a show.”

“Over the next few weeks, I see more deceit than I’ve ever seen. Roy goes on the radio and he’s one personality… You think he’s the most honest man on earth.

“He had a show in Philadelphia for ten years…and Roy was not on the air [one day]. Roy told me, ‘We decided that that station is not good enough for us.’

“I accepted that. Then I saw a letter on the podium from a lawyer from that radio station in Philadelphia. It said, Mr. Masters, we don’t care how long you’ve been on this station, we don’t want your show anymore.

“It was just the beginning.

“I continued to give celebrity interviews to him and he fell behind in paying me.

“They buy the Art Bell Show and decided to start a radio network. Roy said, ‘Eliot, you will have one of the biggest radio shows in the nation.’

“Finally, we sat down. I said I didn’t want my own daily show. I want the Saturday and Sunday Art Bell show. They said fine.

“I turned to Roy and said, ‘What is the status of the money owed to me by your magazine?’

“Roy Masters looked me in the eye and said, ‘We’ve never had anything to do with that magazine.’

“Mr. Honesty wants to get out of having to pay for something. He’d just sold the magazine.

“Roy and his son David got mad at me.

“I filed in court.

“The day before we were to go to court, somebody who had nothing to do with this said, ‘I want you all to be friends. I’m going to pay you out of my pocket.’

“When people found out I was off the station, they told me things about Roy Masters.

“For example, before I moved there, Roy had applied for a gun permit. When he was asked if he had been arrested, he said no.

“They arrested him on the spot because he’d been arrested several times in his life. When he was a young man in Florida, he beat up his uncle on the beach. Arrest number two was in Houston, Texas. He was arrested for doing hypnotism. They said he was practicing medicine without a license. The third time was the gun permit. Almost the fourth time, his daughter-in-law, married to David, said Roy Masters slugged her, Lisa, and hit the children. She said this on Extra.”

“I can tell you some sad stories of wives and husbands giving up everything they own to become a part of Roy’s community.

“I was a business associate of Roy. He trusted me because I was not what he called a Roy-bot. I used to babysit his grandkids.

“He had a little cult in Grand Pass, Oregon. People who’d moved there to be a part of his organization.

“People would call me with thing after thing done by him and his sons of a despicable nature.

“He had a sugar daddy who gave him millions of dollars. That’s why he had a radio station to start a network. He told me about it.

“He has four sons. Three of them are high school dropouts. All of them were given huge amounts of money by Roy’s followers to start various businesses.

“His politics became so much to the right, particularly religiously, that I could not stand him.

“I used to be a strong conservative. When I saw the conservative movement say, ‘Either you accept all the philosophies of our movement or you can’t be a part of it,’ I started drifting away. I’m a conservative Democrat. I’m what John F. Kennedy used to be.

“Everything I’ve written about him is true. He tried to send lawyers against me. He finally gave up. He realized it is my opinion.

“I got out of there in 1993.

“People have written to thank. Their husband or son got involved with Roy Masters’ cult… I’ve been doing it as a public service.”

“How did I deal with people not hearing my point of view when Cathy came out with that? With my parody and satire. I’m very good at parody.”

“She and her daughter defamed me. They’re good writers. They used their abilities to do things that were unfair. They know how to manipulate in their writing and show only one side and leave everything else out. When Cathy left things out, people responded exactly as she knew they’d respond. They deleted all my comments. It was not fair. They accomplished what they wanted to do but it hurt a lot of people. It hurt my wife, it hurt my son, it hurt my family, it hurt my friends.”

“They had their fun. I had my fun. It grew into a satirical battle.

“People should be glad it was a war of words. There are nuts who go out there and settle things in other ways. She writes her biting stuff and I write my parody. There’s never any thought of going beyond that.

“I don’t like some of her politics. I never saw her being a theocrat like Mr. Masters. She’s more like a neo-con.

“Did I have a political agenda? Yes. That was part of it.”

“By the way, there is nobody else dot com.”

“Is there anything I did that she found funny?”

Luke: “No.”

Via email before the interview, Eliot provided these highlights:

*Can you imagine having the ONLY (and first) interactive forum about showbiz on the Internet? When directors started sending me letters thanking me for my positive reviews, it was incredulous.
*Both NBC and CBS had SECRET over-the-air internet projects. Millions spent–with only a few hundred test terminals connected to people’s TVs. After a couple of years they decided, “nobody is interested in getting additional data on their TV screens.” THEY could have been AOL.
*Around 1990, I was removed from the 20th Century Fox press kits/screenings/releases list. I called to find out what had happened. The President of publicity of 20th publicity said to me: “What you do is not viable.”
*A publicity executive at Disney screamed insults at me when I asked why we had not been invited to a certain movie.
“WE KNOW WHAT WE ARE DOING HERE. YOU CAN’T COME!!!!.” A few years later, when Disney called and begged me to put them on the front page of AOL and CompuServe (as I had done for other studios), you can guess how I responded.
*Johnny Rivers was the first musician to do a live audio interview over the Internet. With me of course. It was very exciting.
*I had a fantastic daily showbiz news service that was available online. We scored numerous “firsts” (we called everybody in town asking for tidbits). We soon found out that other media was using our daily leads. One day, a guy calls from “Entertainment Tonight.” “How come your service is late today?” “We’re just a little behind,” I said. “Well we really love it. We access it everyday.” We found out that lots of media (especially radio stations nationwide) were getting all these hot headlines–never crediting us–and as just part of their subscription to AOL or CompuServe. (We eventually got a radio syndicator to send it out and charge them)

Posted in Eliot Stein | Comments Off on Eliot Stein Interview